<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojms
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Open Journal of Marine Science
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2161-7384
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2161-7392
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ojms.2024.144006
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojms-137117
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Earth 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Environmental Sciences
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Analysis of Otolith Shape as a Tool for Discriminating Stocks of Cassava Croaker (Pseudotolithus senegalensis) in Beninese Waters
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Madel Floriane Adjibayo
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Houeto
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Marius
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Sounouvou
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Malek
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Tazarki
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Nicolas
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Andrialovanirina
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"> 
      <sup>3</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Meriam Ben
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Ghorbel
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Marwa
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Mejri
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Pierre
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Dossou-Yovo
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"> 
      <sup>4</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Abdellah
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Chalh
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"> 
      <sup>5</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Jean-Pierre
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Quignard
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"> 
      <sup>6</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Kélig
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Mahé
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"> 
      <sup>3</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Monia
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Trabelsi
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aLaboratory of Ecology, Biology and Physiology of Aquatic Organisms, Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aInstitute of Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Abomey-Calavi (UAC), Abomey-Calavi, Benin
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff3">
    <addr-line>
     aFisheries Resources Laboratory, Unit HMMN, French Institute for Ocean Science (IFREMER), Boulogne-sur-Mer, France
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff4">
    <addr-line>
     aLaboratory for Research into the Processing and Conservation of Fishery Products (LAREPROH), University of Abomey Calavi (UAC), Abomey-Calavi, Bénin
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff5">
    <addr-line>
     aUnit of Population Genetics and Biological Resources, Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff6">
    <addr-line>
     aIchtyology Laboratory, Montpellier University П, Montpellier, France
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     30
    </day> 
    <month>
     09
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    14
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    04
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    96
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    114
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      19,
     </day>
     <month>
      June
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      28,
     </day>
     <month>
      June
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      28,
     </day>
     <month>
      October
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    This study examined the right and left otoliths of 174 individuals of Pseudotolithus senegalensis from the Porto-Novo lagoon, Lake Nokoué and the Atlantic coast. The results show a significant variation in the population according to geographic location. Mixed-effects linear analysis showed no significant variation by site, side or sex (p &gt; 0.05). Analysis of otolith shape using ANOVA showed significant differences for length, width and area (p &lt; 0.05), but not for perimeter (p &gt; 0.05). Canonical discriminant analysis revealed significant differences between sites (p &lt; 0.05). Finally, shape analyses showed significant differences between sites (p = 0.0001) and between right and left sides (p = 0.007), but no difference by sex (p = 0.395). The study of otolith morphology is therefore proving to be a valuable tool for differentiating stocks and understanding ecological variations.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Otoliths
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Pseudotolithus senegalensis
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Factorial Analysis
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Porto-Novo Lagoon
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Atlantic Coast and Lake Nokoué
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Total local production from marine, river, lagoon and lake fisheries is insufficient to meet the demand of the Beninese population. Artisanal fisheries mainly catch species with a high market value, such as Sciaenidae (21.75%), Polynemidae (8.77%), Lutjanidae (5.52%) and Sparidae (4.07%) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. The Sciaenidae are a diverse and abundant family of fish closely related to snappers, but they are distinguished by a short spiny dorsal fin and much longer adipose fin than anal fin, which has only one or two spines <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. This family includes a large diversity of fishes, such as curvins, drum fishes, meagre fishes and weak fishes. It comprises around 70 genera and 270 species, 14 of which are sampled along the Gulf of Guinea, on the coast of West Africa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. The genus Pseudotolithus senegalensis (Valenciennes, 1833), belonging to the family Sciaenidae, represents an abundant and economically important group of fish in the coastal waters of Benin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-3">
     [3]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-5">
     [5]
    </xref>, and along the Atlantic coast of West Africa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-6">
     [6]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>In tropical waters, it is particularly difficult to determine the age of fish from otoliths because of the similarity of the seasons throughout the year. The otolith is a mineral formation found in the vestibular organ of the inner ear. The sensory structures of the inner ear include the utricle, saccule and lagena, with individual otoliths: the lapillus, sagitta and astericus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-7">
     [7]
    </xref>. These otoliths are metabolically inert, meaning that they cannot be modified or generally resorbed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-8">
     [8]
    </xref>. Several studies have exploited otoliths as tools in the field of fisheries science <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-9">
     [9]
    </xref>. These formations are considered to be natural archives, permanently preserving information about the environment, past climate and the life history of the individual. Their form has proved useful in fish age studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-10">
     [10]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-12">
     [12]
    </xref>, ontogenetic processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-13">
     [13]
    </xref> and the spatial and temporal migrations of fish <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-14">
     [14]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Sagittal otoliths show relatively higher inter- and intra-specific variability in terms of shape and size. This makes them effective for identifying fish species <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-15">
     [15]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-17">
     [17]
    </xref>, populations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-18">
     [18]
    </xref> and stocks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-12">
     [12]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-20">
     [20]
    </xref>. In addition, genetic and exogenous factors such as water temperature, salinity, depth and food supply have some influence on otolith morphological variability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-21">
     [21]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-23">
     [23]
    </xref>. Our aim here is to assess the morphometric and morphological variability of P. senegalensis otoliths in lagoon and marine environments.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Sampling</title>
    <p>This comparative study was carried out at three different locations: the Porto-Novo lagoon, Lake Nokoué and the coast of Benin on the Atlantic Ocean (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>). The Porto-Novo lagoon, covering an area of approximately 35 km<sup>2</sup>, is located in south-east Benin between latitudes 6˚25' and 6˚30' North and longitudes 2˚30' and 2˚38' East. Lake Nokoué lies between latitudes 6˚20' and 6˚30' North and longitudes 2˚20' and 2˚35' East. These two environments are receptacles for the waters of the Ouémé and Sô rivers, and they communicate with each other, especially during the low-water period when Atlantic tides are strong. The coast of the Atlantic, south of Benin, comprises various bodies of water in communication with the sea, located between 1˚20' and 3˚00' East longitude and 3˚00' and 6˚40' North latitude. The sample totaled 174 individuals of Pseudotolithus senegalensis, distributed as follows: 50 from the Porto-Novo Lagoon, 62 from Lake Nokoué, 62 from the Atlantic coast (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tableS1">
      Table S1
     </xref>). Each individual was sampled with measures of total length (TL ± 0.1 cm) and total weight (W ± 0.1 g).</p>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 1. Map of Pseudotolithus senegalensis sampling locations (S1: Lake Nokoué; S2: Porto-Novo Lagoon, S3: Atlantic coast).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1470650-rId14.jpeg?20241031035603" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Extraction of the Otolith and Image Processing</title>
    <p>Extraction of each pair of otoliths (the left and right sagittal otoliths) was performed by cutting off the head and then removing the gills. The otoliths were collected with forceps, cleaned with distilled water, then dried and preserved in Eppendorf tubes. The species name, area, and date of sampling were noted on a label adhered to the tube. Otolith images were acquired using a Canon powershot digital camera (12.1 mega pixels) through a binocular microscope. Image processing of the whole otoliths was performed using photoshop CS6 image processing software. In order to compare the shapes of the left and right otoliths, a mirror image of the left otolith was used.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Otoliths Shape Analysis</title>
    <p>The otolith outline was described using Fourier elliptic analysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-24">
      [24]
     </xref> on each otolith. The contour was delimited and extracted after image pre-processing leading to a transformation of the original image into a binary image. The OpenCV library was then used to detect the otolith contours in the pre-processed image. This enabled the shape of the otolith to be represented as accurately as possible. The coordinates (x, y) of the main contour describing the shape of the contour were extracted <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-25">
      [25]
     </xref>. Elliptical Fourier analysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-24">
      [24]
     </xref> was carried out on each otolith outline and extracted after binarization of the image. For each otolith, the first 100 elliptical Fourier harmonics (H) were extracted and normalized with respect to the first harmonic and were therefore invariant to size, rotation and the starting point of the otolith contour description <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-26">
      [26]
     </xref>. To determine the number of harmonics required to reconstruct the otolith contour, the cumulative Fourier power (F) was calculated for each individual otolith as a measure of the accuracy of the contour reconstruction obtained with n harmonics): n<sub>k</sub> harmonics (i.e., the proportion of variance in the contour coordinates explained by the k</p>
    <p>
     <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mi>
         F 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ( 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <msub> 
          <mi>
            n 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            k 
          </mi> 
         </msub> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ) 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <munderover> 
        <mstyle mathsize="140%" displaystyle="true"> 
         <mo>
           ∑ 
         </mo> 
        </mstyle> 
        <mrow> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           = 
         </mo> 
         <mn>
           0 
         </mn> 
        </mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <msub> 
          <mi>
            n 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            k 
          </mi> 
         </msub> 
        </mrow> 
       </munderover> 
       <mfrac> 
        <mrow> 
         <mi>
           A 
         </mi> 
         <msup> 
          <mi>
            i 
          </mi> 
          <mn>
            2 
          </mn> 
         </msup> 
         <mi>
           i 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           + 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           B 
         </mi> 
         <msup> 
          <mi>
            i 
          </mi> 
          <mn>
            2 
          </mn> 
         </msup> 
         <mo>
           + 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           C 
         </mi> 
         <msup> 
          <mi>
            i 
          </mi> 
          <mn>
            2 
          </mn> 
         </msup> 
         <mo>
           + 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           D 
         </mi> 
         <msup> 
          <mi>
            i 
          </mi> 
          <mn>
            2 
          </mn> 
         </msup> 
        </mrow> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
       </mfrac> 
      </mrow> 
     </math></p>
    <p>where Ai, Bi, Ci and Di are the harmonic coefficients and n<sub>k</sub> is the total number of harmonics included. The value of n<sub>k</sub> was chosen so that F(n<sub>k</sub>) explains 99.99% of the variance in contour coordinates, i.e. it reconstructs the shape with 99.99% accuracy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-24">
      [24]
     </xref>. In the second part of the study, ImageJ software was used (using a predefined scale of 1 millimeter) to determine otolith biometric parameters (length (Lo), width (Wo), area (Ao) and perimeter (Po)). Size parameters are measures directly related to otolith size, unlike shape indices, which are dimensionless measures and therefore independent of otolith size. The shape of the otolith relative to a geometric reference shape such as an ellipse for ellipticity (E), and a square for aspect ratio, was determined. They are simple to obtain, and the biological interpretation of the associated results is less complex than that of results obtained from multivariate data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-27">
      [27]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-28">
      [28]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_4">
    <title>2.4. Statistical Analysis</title>
    <p>Length-weight relationships in fish are considered to be allometric growth models of the type:</p>
    <p>Total Weight = K × Total Length<sup>b</sup></p>
    <p>The parameters of such a model are estimated by linear regression on data that have undergone a log-log transformation:</p>
    <p>Log (Total Weight) = Log(K) + b × Log(Total Length).</p>
    <p>Three types of descriptors were analyzed, including otolith size parameters (Length: 𝐿𝑜; Width: 𝑊𝑜; Perimeter: 𝑃𝑜; Area: 𝐴𝑜), shape indices (Ellipticity and Aspect Ratio), and EFDs. The analysis focused on the asymmetry between left and right otolith shapes, examining the impact of side on their morphology. To evaluate fluctuating asymmetry, the absolute value of the difference between the right and left sides for length, width, area and perimeter measurements was calculated. Then, the mean of the absolute value of the difference was calculated for each measurement. A Shapiro-Wilk normality test for each measurement was performed to assess the distribution of the data. Finally, a student’s t test to determine whether the mean differs significantly from zero was performed. The percentage of asymmetry using the mean of the absolute difference of otolith size parameters and the mean of the right side for each species was calculated. Finally, whisker box plots for each measure (length, width, area and perimeter) as a function of species and sampling site selected were produced to visualize data distributions. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to an otolith size matrix and the Elliptical Fourier Descriptor (EFD) matrix <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-29">
      [29]
     </xref>, enabling reduction of the data size of EFD matrix while retaining as much information as possible, and acquisition of a subset of the principal components. The selected principal components (PCs) can be used as shape descriptors of the otolith in the analysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-30">
      [30]
     </xref>, where each principal component represents a specific shape feature. Then a matrix of the selected EFDs was created by organizing the selected elliptical Fourier descriptors into columns and the individual otoliths into rows <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-30">
      [30]
     </xref>. Each cell of the matrix represents the value of the descriptor for a given otolith. For each pair of otoliths, the Euclidean distance was then calculated. A mixed-effects model was used to test the effects of inner ear side, sampling site, sex, fish size and fish weight on otolith shape, but also the effect of sampling site, sex and side on size parameters (Length; Width; Perimeter; Area). Their interactions were also taken into account. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed. using the mixed-effects model. This statistic measures the difference between the estimated variance of the model’s random effects and the residual variance. For a better estimate of the divergences between samples, multivariate analyses were performed treating all traits simultaneously. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) is a statistical analysis commonly used for classification and dimension reduction <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-31">
      [31]
     </xref>. It is used to extract discriminant information from multivariate data for classification. Applied LDA is a classification algorithm that seeks to maximize the separation between classes using a linear combination of features. LDA using geographical positions to define the groups to be tested revealed principal components that significantly explained the variation in otolith shape. Canonical discriminant analysis (CDA) and mixed factorial discriminant analysis (MDFA) were then performed to assess the effect of sex, side and sampling site. All statistical tests were performed using the following packages in a python environment Numpy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-32">
      [32]
     </xref>, matplotlib <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-32">
      [32]
     </xref>, pyplot, Scikit-learn <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-32">
      [32]
     </xref>, Pandas, mapply, Plotnine, Plydata, statsmodels <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-32">
      [32]
     </xref>, seaborn, scipy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-32">
      [32]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. W-TL Relationship</title>
    <p>The relationship between total weight and total length of fish was examined at different locations, including the Porto-Novo lagoon, Lake Nokoué and the coast of the Atlantic Ocean (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref>). The results showed significant differences in the length-weight relationship between the three sites studied. Lake Nokoué showed the most robust correlation, followed by the coast of the Atlantic Ocean, while the Porto-Novo lagoon showed the weakest correlation.</p>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 2. The length-weight relationship of Pseudotolithus senegalensis according to the sampling area, each point represents an individual fish.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1470650-rId17.jpeg?20241031035606" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. TL-Otolith Measurements Relationship</title>
    <p>The relationship between total fish length and the different otolith measurements varied considerably between locations (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tableS2">
      Table S2
     </xref>). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref> shows various morphometric measurements (length, width, area, perimeter, aspect ratio and ellipticity) as a function of total length for different aquatic sites: Porto-Novo lagoon, Lake Nokoué and the coast of the Atlantic Ocean. The Porto-Novo lagoon shows the highest dispersion with weak or moderate exponential trends. Differences between right and left are minimal. As for Lake Nokoué, there are well-defined exponential trends in all the morphometric measurements, with clear differences between right and left. This suggests a stronger correlation between measurements and total length at this site. Finally, for the coast of the Atlantic Ocean, the clusters of points are more scattered and showed few clear trends, while the differences between right and left are also minimal.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Effect of Various Factors on the Biometric Parameters of Otoliths</title>
    <p>The results of the linear mixed-effects analysis (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>) examining the effect of site, side and sex on different otolith measurements, such as length, width, area and perimeter, indicate that these otolith characteristics did not vary significantly according to location, side and sex (p &gt; 0.05).</p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 3. Regression showing the correlation between fish size and otolith morphometrics for right (blue) and left (red) otoliths.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1470650-rId18.jpeg?20241031035606" />
    </fig>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-"></xref>Table 1. Results of linear mixed model by each otolith morphological descriptor with the interaction between location and inner ear side and sex of Pseudotolithus senegalensis.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="38.42%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Otolith Parameters</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.45%"><p style="text-align:center">sum_sq</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="13.57%"><p style="text-align:center">Df</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">F</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.77%"><p style="text-align:center">P-value</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Length</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Location:Side</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.45%"><p style="text-align:center">0.124</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.57%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">0.040</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.77%"><p style="text-align:center">0.960</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Location:Sex</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.45%"><p style="text-align:center">0.393</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="13.57%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">0.127</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.77%"><p style="text-align:center">0.880</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Width</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Location:Side</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.45%"><p style="text-align:center">0.147</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.57%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">0.153</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.77%"><p style="text-align:center">0.857</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Location:Sex</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.45%"><p style="text-align:center">0.189</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.57%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">0.193</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.77%"><p style="text-align:center">0.823</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="17.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Area</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Location:Side</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.45%"><p style="text-align:center">6.170</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.57%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">0.02</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.77%"><p style="text-align:center">0.973</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Location:Sex</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.45%"><p style="text-align:center">52.353</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="13.57%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">0.224</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.77%"><p style="text-align:center">0.799</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Perimeter</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Location:Side</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.45%"><p style="text-align:center">0.941</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.57%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">0.036</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.77%"><p style="text-align:center">0.963</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Location:Sex</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.45%"><p style="text-align:center">2.186</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.57%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.79%"><p style="text-align:center">0.085</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.77%"><p style="text-align:center">0.918</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. Analysis of Fluctuating Otolith Asymmetry</title>
    <p>Analysis of the asymmetry percentages (Supplementary Appendix <xref ref-type="table" rid="tableS3">
      Table S3
     </xref>) by parameter and by site revealed interesting variations in otolith symmetry between the different localities studied (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
      Figure 4
     </xref>). For otolith width, the Porto-Novo lagoon showed an average asymmetry percentage of 4.12%, while the coast of the Atlantic Ocean and Lake Nokoué showed slightly different values, with 3.60% and 4.85% respectively. There are also differences between locations in terms of otolith surface area. The Porto-Novo lagoon has an average asymmetry percentage of 4.66%, while the coast of the Atlantic Ocean has the highest level of asymmetry at 5.78%, and Lake Nokoué has an intermediate value of 4.58%. Similar trends were observed for otolith perimeter and length. The coast of the Atlantic Ocean has the largest percentage of asymmetry, followed closely by the Porto-Novo lagoon, while Lake Nokoué has the lowest values.</p>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 4. boxplot percentage asymmetry of otolith biometric parameters by each sampling location.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1470650-rId19.jpeg?20241031035607" />
    </fig>
    <p>Wilcoxon analysis was used to estimate otolith size asymmetries (length, width, area, perimeter) in the different study locations (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tableS4">
      Table S4
     </xref>). The results showed that at the Atlantic Ocean coast, there were significant differences between the areas and widths of otoliths on the right and left sides (p &lt; 0.05), but no significant differences were observed for length and perimeter (p &gt; 0.05).</p>
    <p>As for Porto-Novo Lagoon, the results showed significant differences in all otolith characteristics between the right and left sides (p &lt; 0.05), suggesting a marked asymmetry in the otoliths of fish from this site. Finally, at Lake Nokoué, analyses indicated significant differences between the length, perimeter, width and area of otoliths on the right and left sides (p &lt; 0.05), suggesting a pronounced asymmetry in the otoliths Pseudotolithus senegalensis of Lake Nokoué (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>The results of the ANOVA indicate that otolith length, width and surface area are variables that differ significantly between groups (p &lt; 0.05). The perimeter showed a p-value of 0.45, suggesting a non-significant relationship (Supplementary Appendix <xref ref-type="table" rid="tableS5">
      Table S5
     </xref>, Supplementary Appendix <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figS1">
      Figure S1
     </xref>).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_5">
    <title>3.5. Analysis of Otolith Shape</title>
    <p>The results of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) reveal that the interaction of size, weight and side with site have significant effects (p &lt; 0.05) on variation in otolith shape. The interaction between sex and site did not show a significant difference (p &gt; 0.05). The different interactions between sex, fish length and fish weight as a function of site are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>, with the corresponding F statistics, variability explained and p-values.</p>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 5. Difference between the mean shapes of the reconstructed left and right otoliths at each station ((a): Lake Nokoue, (b): Atlantic coast, (c): Porto-Novo Lagoon).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1470650-rId20.jpeg?20241031035607" />
    </fig>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-"></xref>Table 2. Mixed linear shape model on otolith morphological parameters.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.13%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.71%"><p style="text-align:center">sum_sq</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.72%"><p style="text-align:center">df</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.72%"><p style="text-align:center">F</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.72%"><p style="text-align:center">P-value</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Sex: locations</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.71%"><p style="text-align:center">4.169e+04</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.72%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.72%"><p style="text-align:center">1.257</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.72%"><p style="text-align:center">0.285</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Side: locations</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.71%"><p style="text-align:center">1.420e+05</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.72%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.72%"><p style="text-align:center">4.447</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.72%"><p style="text-align:center">0.012</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Length: locations</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.71%"><p style="text-align:center">1.016e+05</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.72%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.72%"><p style="text-align:center">3.859</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.72%"><p style="text-align:center">0.046</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Weight: locations</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.71%"><p style="text-align:center">1.263e+05</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.72%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.72%"><p style="text-align:center">3.859</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.72%"><p style="text-align:center">0.022</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>The effect of sampling location on otolith shape was significant in the multivariate mixed-effects model (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tableS6">
      Table S6
     </xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="tableS7">
      Table S7
     </xref>), suggesting variation in otolith shape that could be used to discriminate between individuals from different stations. The multivariate mixed-effects model on the 𝑆 shape matrix showed that there was a significant difference between left and right otoliths (p &lt; 0.05) when considering sampling locations, but no difference between individuals according to sex (p &gt; 0.05). After PCA on the Fourier elliptical descriptors (FED), the first two PCs performed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figS2">
      Figure S2
     </xref>) explained 82% of the total variance of the FED.</p>
    <p>The lowest width/length ratio is associated with the “Atlantic coast” class, with a value of 0.52. Otoliths from the Porto Novo lagoon are closer to those from Lake Nokoué, which are themselves closer to those from the Porto Novo lagoon (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
      Figure 6
     </xref>). The magnitudes of directional asymmetry at all locations, measured as the percentage of the surface not overlapping between the shape of the right otolith and that of the left otolith, were on average 10.78%, 4.56% and 4.53% respectively for Pseudotolithus senegalensis individuals sampled on the Atlantic coast, in Lake Nokoué and in the Porto-Novo lagoons). These mean values showed a significant directional asymmetry for Pseudotolithus senegalensis.</p>
    <fig id="fig6" position="float">
     <label>Figure 6</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 6. Difference in mean shapes of reconstructed right otoliths between the three locations used for Pseudotolithus senegalensis identification.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1470650-rId21.jpeg?20241031035607" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Discussion</title>
   <sec id="s4_1">
    <title>4.1. Impact of the Weight-Length Relationship on the Population of Pseudotolithus senegalensis According to Sampling Location</title>
    <p>The results of this study indicated that the population of Pseudotolithus senegalensis varies according to geographical area. The Porto-Novo lagoon and the Atlantic coast show cases of positive allometry, with different degrees of growth between the weight and length of the fish. Troadec (1971) and Sun (1975) drew similar conclusions concerning the length-weight relationships of P. senegalensis in Congo and Senegal respectively, showing positive allometric growth. This observation contrasts with the results of Sossoukpe et al. (2013) who found isometric growth for P. senegalensis in Beninese water bodies, but is similar to those of Adjigbe et al. (2023) also in Beninese water bodies. In fact, length-weight relationships do not remain uniform throughout the year, but show variations influenced by factors such as food availability, feeding rate, gonad development and the physiological state of the animal, as indicated by Santos et al. (2002).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_2">
    <title>4.2. Influence of Environmental Factors on Otolith Growth</title>
    <p>The fluctuation in the relationship between total fish length and various otolith measurements across different geographical locations reveals complex dynamics, suggesting a strong influence on the specific geographical location. The results indicate that the relationship is most robust and significant in the Porto-Novo lagoon, with significant correlations for measures such as otolith length and width, as well as otolith area. This finding suggests that otolith growth and development are closely related to total fish length in this specific environment. However, this relationship loses its strength and significance in other locations such as Lake Nokoué and the coast of the Atlantic Ocean. In these regions, the correlation between total fish length and otolith characteristics is less significant or even weak. For example, although the relationship is significant for the otolith perimeter in the Porto-Novo lagoon, it is less marked in the other locations studied. According to Taylor 1985, given that calcium absorption and serum calcium levels are associated, there is a biological justification for associating changes in fish size with otolith growth. Conceptually, daily variations in fish size are associated with the amplitude of a period of CaCO<sub>3</sub> deposition (i.e. the area under a peak). Thus, otolith growth is determined by the period of deposition, and each period amplitude can be linked to the age and size of the fish. In all cases, the allometry is positive. This indicates that otolith characteristics increase in proportion to the total length of the fish. Such results have been published by several authors who have provided evidence of the allometric growth of otoliths <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-13">
      [13]
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-38">
      [38]
     </xref>. To begin with, the differences observed in the width of the otoliths between the locations suggest variations in the symmetry of this anatomical feature. The Porto-Novo lagoon has a slightly higher average percentage of asymmetry than the coast of the Atlantic Ocean and Lake Nokoué. This could reflect differences in selective pressures or environmental conditions specific to each site, potentially influencing the growth and development of otoliths. The origin and consequences of fluctuating otolith asymmetry in fish remain largely unknown and debated, although it has been documented in several fish species and is regularly associated with stress and/or environmental heterogeneity, and therefore considered an indicator of developmental instability. These results reveal the importance of interactions between several factors, such as size, weight, side and site, on variation in otolith shape in Pseudotolithus senegalensis, whereas no influence was observed for the morphometric parameter. They also show the potential of otolith shape as a marker to discriminate between individuals from different stations and suggest promising avenues for future research into the biology and ecology of this species. In our case study, no effect of sex was observed. It has previously been shown that sexual dimorphism has no effect on otolith shape in swordfish, Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-35">
      [35]
     </xref>), haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-39">
      [39]
     </xref>), Atlantic cod (Gudus morhua <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-40">
      [40]
     </xref>) or blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-30">
      [30]
     </xref>).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_3">
    <title>4.3. Multifactorial Interactions on Otolith Shape</title>
    <p>The shape of otoliths in fish from different geographical origins is influenced by a combination of abiotic environmental factors, such as temperature and salinity, and biotic factors, such as the availability of prey. Moreover, this form also depends on the individual genotype of the fish <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-41">
      [41]
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-45">
      [45]
     </xref>. In addition, ontogenic changes in otolith configuration, often assessed through variations associated with size, have been observed to result from the diversity of growth rates as a function of habitat quality and development processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-46">
      [46]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-47">
      [47]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_4">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-"></xref>4.4. Directional Asymmetry between Sites</title>
    <p>Analysis of the amplitudes of directional asymmetry reveals significant differences between locations. Individuals sampled on the Atlantic coast show significantly higher directional asymmetry than those sampled in Lake Nokoué and the Porto-Novo lagoons. This observation may indicate differences in environmental constraints or growth patterns that influence otolith symmetry in Pseudotolithus senegalensis in these different habitats. Our results show that DA can be observed in otolith shape in round fish such as Pseudotolithus senegalensis. DA between right and left otolith shapes has already been described for other roundfish species such as Liza ramada <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-48">
      [48]
     </xref>, Diplodus annularis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-49">
      [49]
     </xref>, Diplodus puntazzo <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-50">
      [50]
     </xref>, Clupea harengus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-51">
      [51]
     </xref> and Scomberomorus niphonius. Otoliths from the Porto-Novo lagoon appear to be closer to those from Lake Nokoué, and vice versa, than those collected on the Atlantic coast. This similarity between otolith shapes in lagoons and lakes may reflect similar environmental conditions or comparable growth patterns in these coastal and freshwater habitats, as opposed to the more contrasting marine environment of the southern Atlantic coast.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Conclusion</title>
   <p>This study revealed variations in the shape of otoliths of Pseudotolithus senegalensis across different locations, notably the Porto-Novo lagoon, Lake Nokoué and the Atlantic coast. Analyses revealed that the relationship between otolith morphometric measurements and total fish length was most robust and significant in the Porto-Novo lagoon, moderate on the Atlantic coast, and weak in Lake Nokoué. Site, side or sex factors had no effect on the biometric parameters. Canonical discriminant analysis showed significant differences between sites, indicating the influence of the environment on otolith shape.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>Acknowledgments</title>
   <p>We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Dr Kakpo Césaire, CEO of K-POLYGONE multinational, for the financial support you provided for this research work. Your interest and encouragement were essential elements that enriched this experience.</p>
   <p>This work has benefited also from the grant “ANR-21-EXES-0011” as part of the IFSEA graduate school (which originates from National Research Agency under the Investments for the Future program).</p>
  </sec><sec id="s7">
   <title>Supplementary</title>
   <table-wrap id="table3">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-"></xref>Table S1. Sampling information (total length and total weight) of Pseudotolithus senegalensis in Benin waters according to the sampling locations.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="36.86%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Sampling locations</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.62%"><p style="text-align:center">Lagoon of Porto Novo</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.79%"><p style="text-align:center">Lake Nokoué</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.74%"><p style="text-align:center">Atlantic coast</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td rowspan="3" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.05%"><p style="text-align:center">Total length (cm)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.80%"><p style="text-align:center">Mean ± SD</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.62%"><p style="text-align:center">22.1 ± 1.8</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.79%"><p style="text-align:center">23.6 ± 2.5</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.74%"><p style="text-align:center">27.2 ± 1.9</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.80%"><p style="text-align:center">max</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.62%"><p style="text-align:center">27.0</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.79%"><p style="text-align:center">31.2</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="21.74%"><p style="text-align:center">32.2</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.80%"><p style="text-align:center">min</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.62%"><p style="text-align:center">18.0</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.79%"><p style="text-align:center">18.0</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.74%"><p style="text-align:center">23.4</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td rowspan="3" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.05%"><p style="text-align:center">Total weight (g)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.80%"><p style="text-align:center">Mean ± SD</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.62%"><p style="text-align:center">3.8 ± 1.8</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.79%"><p style="text-align:center">8.70 ± 3.3</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.74%"><p style="text-align:center">13.7 ± 2.5</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.80%"><p style="text-align:center">max</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.62%"><p style="text-align:center">12.2</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.79%"><p style="text-align:center">18.6</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="21.74%"><p style="text-align:center">22.2</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.80%"><p style="text-align:center">min</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.62%"><p style="text-align:center">3.8</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.79%"><p style="text-align:center">3.2</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="21.74%"><p style="text-align:center">7.4</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <table-wrap id="table4">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-"></xref>Table S2. Regression results.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="33.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Location</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">Variable</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="36.40%"><p style="text-align:center">R-squared</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">P-value</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td rowspan="4" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="33.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Lake Nokoué</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">Length</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="36.40%"><p style="text-align:center">0.016</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">1.632e−01</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">Width</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="36.40%"><p style="text-align:center">0.012</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">2.259e−01</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">Area</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="36.40%"><p style="text-align:center">0.023</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">9.025e−02</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">Perimeter</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="36.40%"><p style="text-align:center">0.022</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">9.920e−02</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td rowspan="4" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="33.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Atlantic coast</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">Length</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="36.40%"><p style="text-align:center">2.02e−04</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">8.838e−01</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">Width</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="36.40%"><p style="text-align:center">0.002</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">6.106e−01</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">Area</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="36.40%"><p style="text-align:center">0.003</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">5.566e−01</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">Perimeter</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="36.40%"><p style="text-align:center">3.33e−04</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">8.512e−01</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td rowspan="4" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="33.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Porto-Novo Lagoon</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">Length</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="36.40%"><p style="text-align:center">0.209</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">1.664e−06</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">Width</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="36.40%"><p style="text-align:center">0.165</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">2.638e−05</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">Area</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="36.40%"><p style="text-align:center">0.228</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">5.018e−07</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">perimeter</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="36.40%"><p style="text-align:center">0.269</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="34.59%"><p style="text-align:center">3.108e−08</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <table-wrap id="table5">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
      Table 5
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-"></xref>Table S3. Percentage asymmetry of biometric parameters per location.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Otolith parameters</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:center">Porto-Novo Lagoon</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Lake Nokoué</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:center">Atlantic coast</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Length</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:center">0.774</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">0.596</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:center">1.501</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Width</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:center">4.118</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">4.849</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:center">3.602</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Area</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:center">4.656</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">4.578</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:center">5.779</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Perimeter</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:center">0.906</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="24.99%"><p style="text-align:center">1.410</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="25.01%"><p style="text-align:center">1.891</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <table-wrap id="table6">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
      Table 6
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-"></xref>Table S4. P-value of asymmetry fluctuating between right and left.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="27.36%"><p style="text-align:center">Otolith parameters</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="72.64%" colspan="3"><p style="text-align:center">Locations</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="25.58%"><p style="text-align:center">LN</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="23.44%"><p style="text-align:center">LP</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="23.62%"><p style="text-align:center">AC</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="27.36%"><p style="text-align:center">Length</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.58%"><p style="text-align:center">0.015**</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.44%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0282**</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.62%"><p style="text-align:center">0.314</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="27.36%"><p style="text-align:center">Width</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="25.58%"><p style="text-align:center">3.352e−10***</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="23.44%"><p style="text-align:center">4.380e−11***</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="23.62%"><p style="text-align:center">0.003***</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="27.36%"><p style="text-align:center">Area</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="25.58%"><p style="text-align:center">3.282e−11***</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="23.44%"><p style="text-align:center">5.329e−15***</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="23.62%"><p style="text-align:center">0.01**</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="27.36%"><p style="text-align:center">Perimeter</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="25.58%"><p style="text-align:center">2.367e−05***</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="23.44%"><p style="text-align:center">0.023**</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="23.62%"><p style="text-align:center">0.164</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>**: Significant at p &lt; 0.01; ***: Significant at p &lt; 0.001.</p>
   <table-wrap id="table7">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">
      Table 7
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-"></xref>Table S5. ANOVA results for otolith length, width and surface area between groups.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="19.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Attribute</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Wilks L.</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Partial L.</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">F</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">p-value</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Length</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.724</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.981</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">3.198</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">P &lt; 0.05</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="19.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Width</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.862</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.824</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">36.418</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">P &lt; 0.05</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="19.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Area</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.815</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.872</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">25.071</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">P &lt; 0.05</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="19.99%"><p style="text-align:center">Perimeter</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.714</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.995</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.806</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.00%"><p style="text-align:center">P &gt; 0.05</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <table-wrap id="table8">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">
      Table 8
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-"></xref>Table S6. MANOVA of principal components: location side.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="31.16%"><p style="text-align:center">locations: side</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.20%"><p style="text-align:center">Value</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.21%"><p style="text-align:center">DF</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.21%"><p style="text-align:center">F Value</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.21%"><p style="text-align:center">P value</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="31.16%"><p style="text-align:center">Wilks’ lambda</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.20%"><p style="text-align:center">0.792</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.21%"><p style="text-align:center">44.00</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.21%"><p style="text-align:center">1.796</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.21%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt;0.0001</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="31.16%"><p style="text-align:center">Pillai’s trace</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.20%"><p style="text-align:center">0.215</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.21%"><p style="text-align:center">44.00</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.21%"><p style="text-align:center">1.76</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.21%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt;0.0001</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="31.16%"><p style="text-align:center">Hotelling-Lawley trace</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.20%"><p style="text-align:center">0.251</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.21%"><p style="text-align:center">44.00</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.21%"><p style="text-align:center">0.72</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.21%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt;0.0001</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="31.16%"><p style="text-align:center">Roy’s greatest root</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.20%"><p style="text-align:center">0.202</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.21%"><p style="text-align:center">22.00</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.21%"><p style="text-align:center">2.96</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.21%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt;0.0001</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <table-wrap id="table9">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">
      Table 9
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-"></xref>Table S7. MANOVA of principal components: location sex.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="31.37%"><p style="text-align:center">locations: sex</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.15%"><p style="text-align:center">Value</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.15%"><p style="text-align:center">DF</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.15%"><p style="text-align:center">F Value</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.17%"><p style="text-align:center">P value</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="31.37%"><p style="text-align:center">Wilks’ lambda</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.15%"><p style="text-align:center">0.91</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.15%"><p style="text-align:center">44.00</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.15%"><p style="text-align:center">0.72</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.17%"><p style="text-align:center">0.908</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="31.37%"><p style="text-align:center">Pillai’s trace</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.15%"><p style="text-align:center">0.09</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.15%"><p style="text-align:center">44.00</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.15%"><p style="text-align:center">0.73</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.17%"><p style="text-align:center">0.906</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="31.37%"><p style="text-align:center">Hotelling-Lawley trace</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.15%"><p style="text-align:center">0.10</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.15%"><p style="text-align:center">44.00</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.15%"><p style="text-align:center">1.82</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.17%"><p style="text-align:center">0.909</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="31.37%"><p style="text-align:center">Roy’s greatest root</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.15%"><p style="text-align:center">0.05</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.15%"><p style="text-align:center">22.00</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.15%"><p style="text-align:center">0.84</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.17%"><p style="text-align:center">0.669</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <fig id="fig7" position="float">
    <label>Figure 7</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure S1. Canonical Discriminant Analysis with the first two canonical variables of the biometric parameters for 4 classes (Lake Nokoué (red), Porto-Novo lagoon (blue), Atlantic coast (green)).</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1470650-rId56.jpeg?20241031035612" />
   </fig>
   <fig id="fig8" position="float">
    <label>Figure 8</label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.137117-"></xref>Figure S2. Difference in mean shapes of reconstructed otoliths between identified stock units: Lake Nokoué (red; Left: solid line, Right: dotted line), Atlantic coast (green; Left: solid line, Right: dotted line), Porto-Novo Lagoon (blue; Left: solid line, Right: dotted line).</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1470650-rId57.jpeg?20241031035612" />
   </fig>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Anato, C.B. (1996) Les ressources marines vivantes du Golfe de Guinée de la Guinée Conakry à l’Angola: Cas du Bénin. Atelier Sous Régional du Comité Océ-anographique International UNESCO, Cotonou, 5-7 juin 1996, 43.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Edwards, A.J., Gill, A.C. and Abohweyere, P.O. (2001) A Revision of Irvine’ Marine Fishes of Tropical West Africa. Darwin Initiative Report, 2, 157. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gbaguidi, A. (2000) Statistiques de la pêche maritime artisanale. Direction des Pêches, p. 40.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gbaguidi, A. (2001) Etude de l’impact écologique et socio-économique de la senne de plage sur les moyens d’existence des communautés de pêche au Bénin. Programme des Moyens d’Existence Durable dans la Pêche. Rapport d’étude. Direction des Pêches, p. 53.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sossoukpe, E. (2011) Études écologiques sur les Pseudotolithus senegalensis spp (Sciaenidae) dans les eaux littorales du Bénin (Afrique de l’Ouest): Implications pour la conservation et la gestion. Master’s Thesis, Université du Ghana.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bayagbona, E.O. (1969) Détermination de l’âge et paramètres de croissance ber-talanffy de Pseudotolithus senegalensis typus et Pseudotolithus senegalensis en uti-lisant la «Technique des Otolithes Brûlés». Colloque Actes Océanographie et Ressources Halieutiques Atlantique Tropical, UNESCO, Abidjan, 349-359.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kasumyan, A.O. (2004) The Vestibular System and Sense of Equilibrium in Fish. Journal of Ichthyology, 44, S224.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Casselman, J.M. (1987) Détermination de l’âge et de la croissance. In: Weatherley, A.H. and Gill, H.S., Eds., Dans La biologie de la croissance des poisons, Academic Press, 209-242. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Reibisch, J. (1899) Ueber die Einzahl bei Pleuronectes platessa und die Altersbes-timmung dieser Form aus den Otolithen. Helgol Wiss Meeresunters, 4, 233-248.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Campana, S.E. and Jones, C.M. (1992) Analysis of Otolith Microstructure Data. In: Stevenson, D.K. and Campana, S.E., Eds., Otolith Microstructure Examination and Analysis, Canadian Special Publication Fisheries Aquatic Sciences, 73-100.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gettel, G.M., Deegan, L.A. and Harvey, C.J. (1997) A Comparison of Whole and Thin-Sectioned Otolith Aging Techniques and Validation of Annuli for Arctic Grayling. Northwest Science, 71, 224-232.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mendoza, R.P.R. (2006) Otoliths and Their Applications in Fishery Science. Ribarstvo, 64, 89-102.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Capoccioni, F., Costa, C., Aguzzi, J., Menesatti, P., Lombarte, A. and Ciccotti, E. (2011) Ontogenetic and Environmental Effects on Otolith Shape Variability in Three Mediterranean European Eel (Anguilla anguilla, L.) Local Stocks. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 397, 1-7. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2010.11.011
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Smith, W.E. and Kwak, T.J. (2014) A Capture-Recapture Model of Amphidromous Fish Dispersal. Journal of Fish Biology, 84, 897-912. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12316
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tuset, V.M., Lombarte, A. and Assis, C.A. (2008) Otolith Atlas for the Western Medi-terranean, North and Central Eastern Atlantic. Scientia Marina, 72, 7-198. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2008.72s1199
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bani, A., Poursaeid, S. and Tuset, V.M. (2013) Comparative Morphology of the Sagittal Otolith in Three Species of South Caspian Gobies. Journal of Fish Biology, 82, 1321-1332. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12073
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jawad, L.A., Hoedemakers, K., Ibáñez, A.L., Ahmed, Y.A., Abu El-Regal, M.A. and Mehanna, S.F. (2017) Morphology Study of the Otoliths of the Parrotfish, Chlorurus sordidus (Forsskål, 1775) and Hipposcarus harid (Forsskål, 1775) from the Red Sea Coast of Egypt (Family: Scaridae). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 98, 819-828. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315416002034
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bose, A.P.H., Adragna, J.B. and Balshine, S. (2016) Otolith Morphology Varies between Populations, Sexes and Male Alternative Reproductive Tactics in a Vocal Toadfish Porichthys notatus. Journal of Fish Biology, 90, 311-325. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13187
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pothin, K., Gonzalez‐Salas, C., Chabanet, P. and Lecomte‐Finiger, R. (2006) Distinction between Mulloidichthys flavolineatus Juveniles from Reunion Island and Mauritius Island (South-West Indian Ocean) Based on Otolith Morphometrics. Journal of Fish Biology, 69, 38-53. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2006.01047.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Duarte-Neto, P., Lessa, R., Stosic, B. and Morize, E. (2008) The Use of Sagittal Otoliths in Discriminating Stocks of Common Dolphinfish (Coryphaena hippurus) off Northeastern Brazil Using Multishape Descriptors. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 65, 1144-1152. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsn090
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hüssy, K. (2008) Otolith Shape in Juvenile Cod (Gadus morhua): Ontogenetic and Environmental Effects. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 364, 35-41. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2008.06.026
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Berg, F., Almeland, O.W., Skadal, J., Slotte, A., Andersson, L. and Folkvord, A. (2018) Genetic Factors Have a Major Effect on Growth, Number of Vertebrae and Otolith Shape in Atlantic Herring (Clupea harengus). PLOS ONE, 13, e0190995. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190995
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bremm, C. and Schulz, U. (2014) Otolith Atlas of Fish of the Sinos River. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 74, 274-282. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.11612
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lestrel, P.E. (1997) Fourier Descriptors and Their Applications in Biology. Cam-bridge University Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Andrialovanirina, N., Caillault, É.P., Couette, S., Laffont, R., Poloni, L., Lutet-Toti, C., et al. (2023) Asymmetry of Sagittal Otolith Shape Based on Inner Ear Side Tested on Mediterranean Red Mullet (Mullus barbatus Linnaeus, 1758): Comparative Analysis of 2D and 3D Otolith Shape Data. Symmetry, 15, Article No. 1067. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15051067
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kuhl, F.P. and Giardina, C.R. (1982) Elliptic Fourier Features of a Closed Contour. Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 18, 236-258. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-664x(82)90034-x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cadrin, S.X. and Friedland, K.D. (1999) The Utility of Image Processing Techniques for Morphometric Analysis and Stock Identification. Fisheries Research, 43, 129-139. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-7836(99)00070-3
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Stransky, C. and MacLellan, S.E. (2005) Species Separation and Zoogeography of Redfish and Rockfish (Genus Sebastes) by Otolith Shape Analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 62, 2265-2276. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1139/f05-143
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rohlf, F.J. and Archie, J.W. (1984) A Comparison of Fourier Methods for the Description of Wing Shape in Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Systematic Zoology, 33, 302-317. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2307/2413076
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mahe, K., Oudard, C., Mille, T., Keating, J., Gonçalves, P., Clausen, L.W., et al. (2016) Identifying Blue Whiting (Micromesistius Poutassou) Stock Structure in the Northeast Atlantic by Otolith Shape Analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 73, 1363-1371. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2015-0332
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Peng, J., Heisterkamp, D.R. and Dai, H.K. (2003) LDA/SVM Driven Nearest Neighbor Classification. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 14, 940-942. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1109/tnn.2003.813835
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Boschetti, A. and Massaron, L. (2016) Python Data Science Essentials. 2nd Edition, Springer.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Adjigbe, G., Gangbazo Kpogue, D. and Zounon, Y. (2023) Study of the Population Structure, Exploitation Level and Growth in Relation to the Otoliths Weight of Pseudotolithus Senegalensis (Valenciennes, 1833) and Pseudotolithus Senegalensis Typus (Bleeker, 1863) in Benin Coasts. Research Square.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Santos, J.E.P., Villasenor, M., De Peters, E.J., Robinson P.H., Baldwin B.C. (2002). Type de graines de coton et de gossypol dans l’alimentation des vaches laitières en lactation: Performances lactationnelles et gossypol plasmatique. Journal des sciences laitières, 85, 1491-1501.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Castonguay, M., Simard, P. and Gagnon, P. (1991) Usefulness of Fourier Analysis of Otolith Shape for Atlantic Mackerel (Scomber scombrus) Stock Discrimination. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 48, 296-302. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1139/f91-041
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Campana, S.E. and Casselman, J.M. (1993) Stock Discrimination Using Otolith Shape Analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 50, 1062-1083. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1139/f93-123
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Begg, G., Overholtz, W. and Munroe, N. (2001) The Use of Internal Otolith Morpho-metrics for Identification of Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) Stocks on George Bank. Fishery Bulletin, 99, 1-14.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Reis-Santos, P., Vasconcelos, R.P., Tanner, S.E., Fonseca, V.F., Cabral, H.N. and Gillanders, B.M. (2018) Extrinsic and Intrinsic Factors Shape the Ability of Using Otolith Chemistry to Characterize Estuarine Environmental Histories. Marine Environmental Research, 140, 332-341. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2018.06.002
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Begg, G.A. and Brown, R.W. (2000) Stock Identification of Haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus on Georges Bank Based on Otolith Shape Analysis. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 129, 935-945. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(2000)129&lt;0935:siohma&gt;2.3.co;2
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cardinale, M., Doering-Arjes, P., Kastowsky, M. and Mosegaard, H. (2004) Effects of Sex, Stock, and Environment on the Shape of Known-Age Atlantic Cod (Gadus morhua) Otoliths. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 61, 158-167. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1139/f03-151
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref41">
    <label>41</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Torres, G.J., Lombarte, A. and Morales-Nin, B. (2000) Sagittal Otolith Size and Shape Variability to Identify Geographical Intraspecific Differences in Three Species of the Genus Merluccius. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 80, 333-342. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315499001915
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref42">
    <label>42</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gagliano, M. and McCormick, M. (2004) Feeding History Influences Otolith Shape in Tropical Fish. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 278, 291-296. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3354/meps278291
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref43">
    <label>43</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Swan, S.C., Geffen, A.J., Morales-Nin, B., Gordon, J.D.M., Shimmield, T., Sawyer, T., et al. (2006) Otolith Chemistry: An Aid to Stock Separation of Helicolenus dactylopterus (Bluemouth) and Merluccius merluccius (European Hake) in the Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 63, 504-513. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2005.08.012
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref44">
    <label>44</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vignon, M. and Morat, F. (2010) Environmental and Genetic Determinant of Otolith Shape Revealed by a Non-Indigenous Tropical Fish. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 411, 231-241. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08651
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref45">
    <label>45</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Simoneau, M., Casselman, J.M. and Fortin, R. (2000) Determining the Effect of Negative Allometry (Length/Height Relationship) on Variation in Otolith Shape in Lake Trout (Salvelinus namaycush), Using Fourier-Series Analysis. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 78, 1597-1603. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1139/z00-093
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref46">
    <label>46</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Monteiro, L.R., Beneditto, A.P.M.D., Guillermo, L.H. and Rivera, L.A. (2005) Allometric Changes and Shape Differentiation of Sagitta Otoliths in Sciaenid Fishes. Fisheries Research, 74, 288-299. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2005.03.002
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref47">
    <label>47</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rebaya, M., Ben Faleh, R., Khedher, M., Trojette, M., Marsaoui, B., Fatnassi, M., et al. (2017) Otolith Shape Discrimination of Liza ramada (Actinopterygii: Mugiliformes: Mugilidae) from Marine and Estuarine Populations in Tunisia. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria, 47, 13-21. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3750/aiep/02006
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref48">
    <label>48</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Trojette, M. (2015) Stock Discrimination of Two Insular Populations of Diplodus annularis (Actinopterygii: Perciformes: Sparidae) along the Coast of Tunisia by Analysis of Otolith Shape. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria, 45, 363-372. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3750/aip2015.45.4.04
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref49">
    <label>49</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bostanci, D., Yilmaz, M., Yedier, S., Kurucu, G., Kontas, S., Darçin, M., et al. (2016) Sagittal Otolith Morphology of Sharpsnout Seabream Diplodus puntazzo (Walbaum, 1792) in the Aegean Sea. International Journal of Morphology, 34, 484-488. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-95022016000200012
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref50">
    <label>50</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bird, J.L., Eppler, D.T. and Checkley Jr., D.M. (1986) Comparisons of Herring Otoliths Using Fourier Series Shape Analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 43, 1228-1234. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1139/f86-152
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.137117-ref51">
    <label>51</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhang, C., Ye, Z., Li, Z., Wan, R., Ren, Y. and Dou, S. (2016) Population Structure of Japanese Spanish Mackerel Scomberomorus niphonius in the Bohai Sea, the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea: Evidence from Random Forests Based on Otolith Features. Fisheries Science, 82, 251-256. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-016-0968-x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>