Reinforced earth is a construction method based on the combination of compacted earth and reinforcement (metal or synthetic) bonded to a facing ( Figure 1 ). Alternating layers of powdered backfill and horizontally distributed strips of reinforcement lead to the development of interacting forces ( Figure 2 ), giving rise to a fully-fledged composite material capable of resisting its own weight and the actions applied to it throughout the service life of the structure. Analysis of the in-service behavior of reinforced earth structures is based on model studies, full-scale experiments, laboratory tests (extraction test, direct shear) and numerical calculations. This analysis is generally focused on defining new modelling or design parameters due to the use of new reinforcement elements, new cladding panels, etc. [1] - [4] . Analytical studies are limited to defining new anchorage models for new types of reinforcement [4] - [10] . In the context of studies carried out on structures reinforced with metal reinforcement, we propose to characterize and model them. To do this, we will first establish a behavioral model of the various parts of the structure, with a view to numerical modeling that will enable parametric analysis of the various characteristics of the materials involved. This phase involves establishing mathematical and computer models to simulate the influence of soil properties (weight by volume, angle of friction, reinforcement characteristics (length, density, spacing, etc.). Finally, we analyze and discuss the results obtained. This analysis will enable us to understand the operation of these structures based on the theory of earth thrust and local equilibrium. To analyze the stability of the reinforced earth mass, the screen will be modeled as a web embedded at its base, connected to reinforcement and subjected to the pressure of the embankment. The aim of this study is to analyze the influence of certain parameters on the behavior of reinforced earth walls. The analysis concerns the parameters of the soil/reinforcement interface, the parameters of the reinforced soil, the use of new synthetic reinforcement, the height of the wall and the soil behavior model.

Reinforced earth is a material resulting from the combination of embankment and metal reinforcement in the form of strips, generally of galvanized steel. When the reinforced-earth structure is subjected to stress, the reinforcement is put in tension by friction, giving the soil an anisotropic cohesion. Figure 1 and Figure 2 show the geometry and arrangement of reinforcement in a reinforced earth wall, and the principle of stress mobilization.

Around the 1970s, authors began to take an interest in the numerical modelling of reinforced earth structures [13] [14] . Since then, several analytical and numerical calculation methods have been developed to analyze the behavior of these structures and the influence of each element and their parameters [15] - [22] . Analytical and numerical methods are increasingly used to analyze the influence of different material parameters on the stability and behavior of reinforced earth structures.

The mobilizable friction force rf per meter of facing in the reinforcement bed is calculated according to the formula:

$r_f=2\cdot N\cdot b{L}_a{f}_{\left(z\right)}^{*}{\sigma }_v$ (14)

With:

N: number of reinforcements per meter of facing;

b: frame width;

L_a: length of adhesion in the resistant zone;

σ_v: average value of the vertical stress on the reinforcement bed;

$f^{\ast }$: apparent coefficient of friction at the level under consideration.

The $f^{\ast }$ parameter is very important in the design and dimensioning of reinforced earth walls. It characterizes the frictional resistance along the reinforcement, considering soil expansion. The actual friction along the reinforcement is defined by the maximum friction coefficient f, which is equal to:

$f=\frac{{\tau }_{\max }}{{\sigma }_v}$ (15)

where ${\sigma }_v$ is the average vertical stress applied to the reinforcement and τ_max the maximum shear stress exerted along the reinforcement. τ_max can be determined by the maximum tensile stress (T_max) in a pull-out test. The maximum tensile stress is reached when the friction is fully mobilized along the reinforcement of length L:

${\tau }_{\max }=\frac{T_{\max }}{2bL}$ (16)

In a dense granular soil, under the effect of the shear stresses τ exerted by the inclusion, the soil zone surrounding the inclusion tends to increase in volume, counteracted by the low compressibility of the surrounding mass. $\Delta {\sigma }_v$ of the initial normal stress ${\sigma }_{v0}$ exerted on the surface of the inclusion ( Figure 6 ; [12] [28] ). So the vertical stress ${\sigma }_v$ applied to the inclusion becomes ${\sigma }_v={\sigma }_{v0}+\Delta {\sigma }_v$. This phenomenon is known as prevented expansion.

The actual coefficient of friction f is therefore expressed as:

$f=\frac{{\tau }_{\max }}{{\sigma }_{v0}+\Delta {\sigma }_v}$ (17)

The three-dimensional nature of this phenomenon and the influence of expansion are difficult to consider in dimensioning methods. The increase ( $\Delta {\sigma }_v$) in normal stress ( ${\sigma }_{v0}$) is difficult to calculate or predict, and is linked to several parameters (volume of the shear zone surrounding the inclusion, initial normal stresses, compression and soil expansion). [28] defined an apparent friction coefficient $f^{\ast }$ to take account of this phenomenon in practice:

$f^{\ast }=\frac{{\tau }_{\max }}{{\sigma }_{v0}}$ (18)

This apparent coefficient ( $f^{\ast }$) is higher than the real coefficient of friction f and often exceeds 1 in granular soils. It can reach 10 in highly dilatant soils. It depends on the weight of the soil above the reinforcement and its surface condition ( Figure 7 ). The increase in the coefficient of friction due to the effect of inhibited expansion is only significant in the case of low vertical stresses. In the case of high vertical stresses, soil dilatancy is negligible. The apparent friction coefficient $f^{\ast }$ decreases with increasing confining stress. It varies between $f_0^{\ast }$ on the surface of the reinforced mass and $f_1^{\ast }$ corresponding to a confinement stress of 120 kPa ( Figure 7 , NF P 94-270).

In order to study the interaction between soil and certain types of reinforcement used in the reinforcement of reinforced earth walls, and to highlight the influence of certain parameters (angle of friction, volume weight of backfill, etc.), calculations were carried out on an example structure, with the aim of determining their impact on the maximum tensile and tensile forces at the facing, and on the resulting moment. For the purposes of parametric analysis, the reinforced earth wall studied is a 1 m long slab, with a mechanical height of $H=7\text{m}$ and wall thickness 0.3 m. Figures 8-14 show, respectively, the evolution of tensile forces (T_P and T_m) and resultant moment (M) as a function of height (Z), angle of internal friction φ, embankment weight and vertical spacing S_v.

Figure 8 and Figure 9 show that the highest tensile stress values were obtained when the value of φ was low. In contrast to the resultant moment, for which significant values were obtained with an φ value. Figure 8 shows that tensile stress (T_m) undergoes three phases in its variation. An increasing trend between 0 and 1 m and a decrease from this value, which represents an extremum. These results show that more the angle of friction is low, more the tensile stress at the facing is great. It can also be seen that this tensile force is less sensitive to the angle of friction at the head and base. Figure 9 shows that the tensile stress T_p at the facing increases with depth and decreases with friction angle. The results in Figure 10 show an increase in the resulting moment between 0 and 1 and a decrease beyond that. These results also show a slight increase in moment with increasing friction. On the other hand, the tensile stress at the facing shows a generally increasing trend, unlike the other stresses. For the first two figures, tensile values are only high if the friction angle is low. This is due to the fact that their expression depends on the thrust coefficient K, which becomes high if φ is low, K becomes high, thus affecting the tensile values. Figure 11 and Figure 12 show that tensile forces are very sensitive to the vertical spacing of reinforcements. These results show an increase in tensile forces with increasing spacing. On the other hand, the resulting moment ( Figure 13 ) is insensitive to vertical spacing. The results in Figure 14 show an increase in tensile stress T_p with the weight of the backfill. We also note that, due to the interaction between the soil and the reinforcement, the tractions developed in the latter are not entirely reversible. In fact, the soil at the interface undergoes permanent deformation, resulting in irreversible tension in the reinforcement.

In all cases, the justification of engineering structures requires a soil investigation to determine their mechanical characteristics. In addition, accurate numerical modeling of reinforced earth structures will provide a better understanding of their behavior. Accurate modeling of the entire structure requires, first and foremost, correct and realistic local modeling of the behavior of a reinforcement anchored in the ground. Local modeling of the reinforcement requires the determination of actual interaction parameters at the soil/reinforcement interface. The mechanism of soil-reinforcement interaction is a fairly complex one, depending on the applied load, the geometry of the structure, the characteristics of the soil and a set of parameters characterizing the nailing: density, number and length of reinforcements, inclination of the reinforcements in relation to the sliding surface, mechanical characteristics of the reinforcements and, in particular, the relative stiffness of the reinforcements and the soil. The results show that the behavior of the structure is strongly influenced by soil-reinforcement interaction. The parametric study of soil-reinforcement interaction has enabled us to understand the behavior of the structure under the influence of certain mechanical and geometric characteristics.