<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    jmp
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Journal of Modern Physics
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2153-1196
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2153-120X
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/jmp.2024.1511069
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    jmp-136451
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Physics 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Mathematics
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Effective Qubit Emerging from the Nanoheterointerface Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Photodynamics
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Emmanuel A.
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Anagnostakis
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="affnull">
    <addr-line>
     aHellenic Physical Society, Alimos, Greece
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     30
    </day> 
    <month>
     09
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    15
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    11
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    1615
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    1620
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      28,
     </day>
     <month>
      August
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      27,
     </day>
     <month>
      August
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      27,
     </day>
     <month>
      September
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    An “Eigenstate Adjustment Autonomy” Model, permeated by the Nanosystem’s Fermi Level Pinning along with its rigid Conduction Band Discontinuity, compatible with pertinent Experimental Measurements, is being employed for studying how the Functional Eigenstate of the Two-Dimensional Electron Gas (2DEG) dwelling within the Quantum Well of a typical Semiconductor Nanoheterointerface evolves versus (cryptographically) selectable consecutive Cumulative Photon Dose values. Thus, it is ultimately discussed that the experimentally observed (after a Critical Cumulative Photon Dose) Phenomenon of 2DEG Negative Differential Mobility allows for the Nanosystem to exhibit an Effective Qubit Specific Functionality potentially conducive to (Telecommunication) Quantum Information Registering.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Semiconductor Nanoheterointerface
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Two-Dimensional Electron Gas
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Nanosystem Photodynamics
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Sign Qubit
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Quantum Information Registering
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136451-"></xref>The Functional Behaviour of a typical Semiconductor Nanoheterointerface Quantum Well 2DEG (e.g. Figs. 2 &amp; 3 of Ref. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136451-1">
     [1]
    </xref> and Fig. 3 of Ref. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136451-2">
     [2]
    </xref>) is primarily representable by the Two-Dimensional Electrons Areal Density (2DEG Sheet Concentration), ζ, and the respective Mobility, μ, on the one hand <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136451-1">
     [1]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136451-3">
     [3]
    </xref>, and by the Schrödinger Eigenstates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136451-2">
     [2]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136451-4">
     [4]
    </xref> pertaining to the Fermionic Quantum Causality <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136451-5">
     [5]
    </xref> of such a Particle Ensemble. The performance of the 2DEG is parametrically controlled by the features of the above Quantum Well hosting its oscillatory dwelling and by the (Persistent-Photoconductivity-Supportive) Low Absolute Temperature of the employed overall Nanodevice, and is driven by the influence of the External (Optical/Photonic or/and Nanoheterointerface-Biasing dc Voltage) Signal. Additionally, the Phenomenon of Negative Differential Mobility (dμ/dδ &lt; 0|δ &gt; Δ) of such a 2DEG can become experimentally manifested, if the Nanosystem has been exposed to a Cumulative Photon Dose, δ, higher than a case-wise specific Critical one, Δ <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136451-1">
     [1]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136451-3">
     [3]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Within the extension of a typical Semiconductor Nanoheterointerface (NHI), the Energy Band Bending of the Quantum Barrier Side and the Conductive Channel is determined <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136451-2">
     [2]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136451-4">
     [4]
    </xref> by the Density of the neighbouring Ionised Impurity Charge and by the Total Electric Field, any Effective Non-Built-In Electric Field being included. Thus, on the one hand, the Bottoms of the 2DEG Subbands are Quantum Mechanically Computable, and, on the other hand, by virtue of the Thermodynamic Equilibrium Condition, the realistic Sheet Concentration of the NHI Quantum Well 2DEG is linked to an ultimately Homogeneous Fermi Level spanning the entire Nanoheterodiode.</p>
   <p>At each Instance of such a Dynamic Equilibrium, the Energy Top of the actually Occupied NHI 2DEG States gets aligned to the respectively valid Fermi Level,</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        ε 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mi>
         ζ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         ρ 
       </mi> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        F 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        , 
      </mo> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (1)</p>
   <p>where F is the Fermi Level, ε is the Energy Bottom of the Fundamental 2DEG Subband (considered to be the sole initially occupied Subband, the Electric Quantum Limit being approached by a conventional NHI primarily functioning at Ambient Temperatures lying in the Region of Absolute Zero), ζ is the Instantaneous 2DEG Sheet Concentration valid within the NHI Quantum Well, and ρ is the (Parabolic-Approximation) Theoretical Two-Dimensional Density of States (Number of States per Unit Lateral Area and per Unit Energy Increment) allowed for Conduction-Band Electrons having the NHI-Growth-Axis Component of the de Broglie Wavevector quantised.</p>
   <p>By common practice, the Method of Modulation Doping embeds an intensely dense Donor Spatial Distribution in the Wider-Bandgap Subregion of the NHI of a typical Epitaxially Grown Semiconductor Diodic Nanoheterodevice. Given that the representative Energy Level of these Donors, D, becomes adequately Deep (in the framework of the Nanostructure Energy Gap Spatial Distribution), it is acceptably expected (and experimentally indirectly verifiable) that the Nanodevice Fermi Level, F, gets “pinned” in the Energy Locus D and remains there (exhibiting a Negligible Effective Rate of Change), whilst the entailed NHI functions owing to selected experimental procedure in the Vicinity of the above Quantum Limit <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136451-2">
     [2]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136451-4">
     [4]
    </xref>.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Eigenstate Adjustment Autonomy Model</title>
   <p>The Dynamics of the Loci of the Energy Levels is now taken into account versus Regulated Consecutive Photon-Doses being absorbed by the traced Semiconductor Nanoheterodevice (having the outer surface of its Wider-Bandgap Epitaxial Layer exposed to the Photon Flows), it is acceptably provable <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136451-2">
     [2]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136451-4">
     [4]
    </xref> that:</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtext>
          d 
        </mtext> 
        <mi>
          ε 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtext>
          d 
        </mtext> 
        <mi>
          δ 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mi>
         ρ 
       </mi> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        ⋅ 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtext>
          d 
        </mtext> 
        <mi>
          ζ 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtext>
          d 
        </mtext> 
        <mi>
          δ 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        : 
      </mo> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (2)</p>
   <p>This Relation provides the Cumulative-Photon-Dose (δ) Rate of Evolution of the Energy Level ε of the Fundamental 2DEG-Eigenstate on the basis of the Experimentally Discernible versus δ Rate of Enhancement of the Areal Density ζ of the 2DEG localised within the Quantum Well of the probed NHI. Through this viewpoint, the Relation describes the Photodynamics of the evolving Modification of the Fundamental Eigenstate of the NHI during the Procedure of successive appropriate Photon-Dose Transmissions being consecutively received by the Nanoheterodevice: To each Experimentally Obtainable Photoenhancement Δζ(δ) of the 2DEG Sheet Concentration ζ (considered with respect to the Dark Value of ζ and consequent upon a certain Instantaneous Total Photon-Dose δ) there corresponds a Red Photoshift Δε(δ) of the Energy Locus ε of the 2DEG Fundamental Eigenstate (considered with respect to the Dark Value of ε), expectedly (through integrating versus δ) expressible as:</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        Δ 
      </mi> 
      <mi>
        ε 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         δ 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mi>
         ρ 
       </mi> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        ⋅ 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        Δ 
      </mi> 
      <mi>
        ζ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         δ 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        . 
      </mo> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (3)</p>
   <p>In Article <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136451-4">
     [4]
    </xref>, a Finite-Differences Algorithm is produced and utilised for the Recurrent Arithmetic Solution of the Schrödinger Equation concerning the Stationary de Broglie Wavefunction of a representative Two-Dimensional Conduction-Band Electron confined within the Quantum Well of the typical NHI: For the each-time Absorbed Cumulative Photon-Dose δ and respective Experimental Sheet-Concentration Photoenhancement Δζ(δ), the Algorithm converges to an Optimal Spatial Width of a Simulative Rectangular Quantum Well compatible with the Fundamental-Eigenenergy Red Photoshift Δε(δ). For each δ, the Algorithm optimises the respective Simulative-Well Width (which gets expanding versus δ at instantaneous Rate induced by the each-time externally regulated δ) under the Physical Condition of the Energy Depth of the Well always remaining equal to the Conduction-Band Discontinuity dictated by the two Different-Semiconductor Epitaxial Layers participating in the studied NHI. As regards the 2DEG (First) Excited Eigenstate Energy Level, it also expectedly exhibits gradual Red Photoshift (versus intaken Instantaneous Total Photon-Dose δ), owing to which it evolves sinking towards the Pinned Fermi Level: At the exact Instance of Saturation of the Capacity Ζ (Maximum Two-Dimensional-Electron Sheet Concentration) of the 2DEG Fundamental Subband this Excited-Eigenenergy Level arrives momentarily at the Energy Locus of the Pinned Fermi Level of the entailed Nanodevice. Then,</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        ζ 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        Z 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        &amp; 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mi>
         ζ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         ρ 
       </mi> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mi>
         Z 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         ρ 
       </mi> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        , 
      </mo> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (4)</p>
   <p>the respective Instantaneous realistic Separation valid between the Energy Loci of the Fundamental and the (First) Excited 2DEG Eigenstates being unveiled. It is at this exact Instance that the experimentally monitored 2DEG Differential Mobility momentarily vanishes, just before the appearance of the Negative Differential Mobility Regime of the Photodynamic Evolution of the probed Nanosystem.</p>
   <p>The Nanosystem’s Fermi Level Pinning along with its rigid Nanoheterointerfacial Conduction Band Discontinuity taken advantage of in the above Algorithm, both being Endosystemic Features <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136451-2">
     [2]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136451-4">
     [4]
    </xref>, constitute the Character essence of what we conceive as the Eigenstate Adjustment Autonomy Model (the “EAA Model”) discussed herewith.</p>
   <p>We have recently enriched the above Algorithm so that for each Instantaneous Total Photon-Dose Intaken by the gradually Photomodified Nanosystem it can also be tracing the connected Energy Locus of the Excited 2DEG Eigenstate, the respective Effective Excited Wavefunction, and the evolving Photoshrinking of the NHI-Quantum-Barrier Penetration Length both of the Fundamental and the Excited 2DEG Wavefunction. We are also currently exploiting these Penetration Lengths as a kind of “Feedback Criterion” for accentuating the Mobility-wise Self-Consistency of the EAA Model.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Emerging Effective Qubit</title>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136451-"></xref>Inspired by that the experimentally monitored 2DEG Differential Mobility (dμ/dδ) Sign Flipping (from + to −) is attributable to the heralding of ignition of Electron-Occupation of the Excited Energy-Subband of the Semiconductor NHI Quantum Well, we come to consider <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136451-6">
     [6]
    </xref> that this Differential Mobility Sign (DMS) exhibits a Qubit Functionality: If, on the one hand, the Fundamental Quantum Eigenstate of the 2DEG serves as the Actually Important one, the DMS is found to be Positive. If, on the other hand, the Excited Quantum Eigenstate of the 2DEG serves (by virtue of a Cumulative Photon Dose exceeding the Critical Value marking the Nanosysterm-Switching “Temporal Interface”) as the Actually Important one, the DMS is found to be Negative.</p>
   <p>Equivalently, against the Orthocanonical Base 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         { 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           | 
         </mo> 
         <mo>
           − 
         </mo> 
         <mo>
           〉 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           | 
         </mo> 
         <mo>
           + 
         </mo> 
         <mo>
           〉 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         } 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>, where representatively permissibly:</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         | 
       </mo> 
       <mo>
         − 
       </mo> 
       <mo>
         〉 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           [ 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mn>
            0 
          </mn> 
          <mtext>
              
          </mtext> 
          <mtext>
              
          </mtext> 
          <mtext>
              
          </mtext> 
          <mn>
            1 
          </mn> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ] 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mtext>
         T 
       </mtext> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        &amp; 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         | 
       </mo> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <mo>
         〉 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           [ 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mn>
            1 
          </mn> 
          <mtext>
              
          </mtext> 
          <mtext>
              
          </mtext> 
          <mtext>
              
          </mtext> 
          <mn>
            0 
          </mn> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ] 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mtext>
         T 
       </mtext> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        , 
      </mo> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (5)</p>
   <p>the Dirac General State Vector of the DMS treated as a Qubit (“DMS Qubit”) is expected to be expressible through the Superposition:</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         | 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         Σ 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         〉 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        α 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         | 
       </mo> 
       <mo>
         − 
       </mo> 
       <mo>
         〉 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        θ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         | 
       </mo> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <mo>
         〉 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        , 
      </mo> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (6)</p>
   <p>under the Normalisation Condition:</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           | 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           α 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           | 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           | 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           θ 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           | 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msup> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        1. 
      </mn> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (7)</p>
   <p>Additionally, given that:</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        σ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         | 
       </mo> 
       <mo>
         − 
       </mo> 
       <mo>
         〉 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         | 
       </mo> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <mo>
         〉 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        &amp; 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        σ 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         | 
       </mo> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <mo>
         〉 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         | 
       </mo> 
       <mo>
         − 
       </mo> 
       <mo>
         〉 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (8)</p>
   <p>(with σ being the First of the Triad of Pauli Matrices), the DMS Flipping can be encoded through the Operator σ acting on the DMS Ket Representation.</p>
   <p>Furthermore, given as well that, when acting upon the Superpositional State Vector:</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136451-"></xref> 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         | 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         s 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         〉 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <msqrt> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msqrt> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           | 
         </mo> 
         <mo>
           − 
         </mo> 
         <mo>
           〉 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           | 
         </mo> 
         <mo>
           + 
         </mo> 
         <mo>
           〉 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        , 
      </mo> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (9)</p>
   <p>the 2DEG Differential Mobility Sign-Ket Inverter σ exactly reproduces 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         | 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         s 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         〉 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (which thereby is proven to be an Eigenvector of the Operator σ under Conjugate Eigenvalue +1), the (Equiprobably-Superposed-Signs) 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         | 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         s 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         〉 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> can be linked with the photodynamically evolutionary Crucial Incidence at which the 2DEG Differential Mobility momentarily vanishes (dμ/dδ = 0|δ = Δ).</p>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Conclusions</title>
   <p>Although significant research in 2DEG-based “Gatemon” Qubits has already been carried out (for example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136451-7">
     [7]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136451-8">
     [8]
    </xref>) and, interestingly, Coherent Rabi Oscillations of such Qubits have been achieved between the pertinent Ground and First Excited Eigenstates, the Phenomenon of 2DEG Negative Differential Mobility has not, to our knowledge, been previously considered as prospectively conducive to some Qubit Functionality of the respective Nanosystem.</p>
   <p>We, herewith, envisage that the Entity of the Effective Qubit emerging by virtue of the DMS of the Photodynamically Evolving Nanoheterointerfacial 2DEG might potentially support Quantum Information Registering: For example, Telecommunication Quantum Information Registering on the basis of a Train of Consecutive (cryptographically differing in Size and Arrival Timing) Photon-Packets being sent to the Nanosystem through an appropriate Optical-Fiber Waveguide.</p>
   <p>We are, furthermore, intending to investigate the prospect of such a 2DEG DMS Qubit Functionality regarding the innovative THz-Photoluminescent Semiconductor Nanoheterointerface containing Two Communicating appropriately Asymmetric Quantum Wells <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136451-9">
     [9]
    </xref>.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>Having been serving Hellenic University Physics for already 35 postdoctoral years, I remain eternally grateful to my original physics mystagogue, charismatic Panagiotis Morphis.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.136451-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Anagnostakis, E.A. and Theodorou, D.E. (1995) Semiconductor Heterointerface Characterisation via Effective Harmonic Oscillator Simulation. Physica Status Solidi (B), 188, 689-695. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.2221880212 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136451-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Anagnostakis, E.A. (2008) Semiconductor-Nanoheterointerface Eigenstate Photonic Modification. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 354, 4233-4237. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.06.029 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136451-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Anagnostakis, E.A. and Theodorou, D.E. (1993) Determination of Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Population Enhancement within Illuminated Semiconductor Heterostructures by Persistent Photoconductivity. Journal of Applied Physics, 73, 4550-4554. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1063/1.352800 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136451-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Anagnostakis, E.A. (2010) Optoelectronic Nanoheterointerface Functional Eigenstate Photodynamics. Physica B: Condensed Matter, 405, 38-40. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2009.08.002 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136451-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Anagnostakis, E.A. (2018) A Notional Duette on Nanophotonics Fundamentals. Optics and Photonics Journal, 8, 317-322. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/opj.2018.811027 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136451-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Anagnostakis, E.A. (2023) On a Qubit Specific Functionality of the 2DEG Differential Mobility Sign. CERN Zenodo. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136451-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Casparis, L., Connolly, M.R., Kjaergaard, M., Pearson, N.J., Kringhøj, A., Larsen, T.W., et al. (2018) Superconducting Gatemon Qubit Based on a Proximitized Two-Dimensional Electron Gas. Nature Nanotechnology, 13, 915-919. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-018-0207-y 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136451-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Strickland, W.M., Baker, L.J., Lee, J., Dindial, K., Elfeky, B.H., Strohbeen, P.J., et al. (2024) Characterizing Losses in InAs Two-Dimensional Electron Gas-Based Gatemon Qubits. Physical Review Research, 6, Article ID: 023094. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevresearch.6.023094 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136451-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Anagnostakis, E.A. (2010) On a Scheme of Nanoheterointerfacial Intersubband 15-Thz Luminescence. Physica B: Condensed Matter, 405, 25-28. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2009.08.010
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>