<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    health
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Health
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    1949-4998
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    1949-5005
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/health.2024.169061
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    health-136340
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Biomedical 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Life Sciences, Medicine 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Healthcare
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Brain Functional Network Changes in Patients with Poststroke Cognitive Impairment Following Acupuncture Therapy
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Ran
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Wang
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Nian
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Liu
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Hao
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Xu
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Peng
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Zhang
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Xiaohua
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Huang
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Lin
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Yang
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Xiaoming
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Zhang
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aScience and Technology Innovation Center, Interventional Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Radiology, Sichuan Province Orthopedic Hospital, Chengdu, China
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     03
    </day> 
    <month>
     09
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    16
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    09
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    856
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    871
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      25,
     </day>
     <month>
      August
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      24,
     </day>
     <month>
      August
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      24,
     </day>
     <month>
      September
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    <b>Background: </b>The mechanisms by which acupuncture affects poststroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) remain unclear. 
    <b>Objective:</b> To investigate brain functional network (BFN) changes in patients with PSCI after acupuncture therapy.
    <b> Methods:</b> Twenty-two PSCI patients who underwent acupuncture therapy in our hospital were enrolled as research subjects. Another 14 people matched for age, sex, and education level were included in the normal control (HC) group. All the subjects underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) scans; the PSCI patients underwent one scan before acupuncture therapy and another after. The network metric difference between PSCI patients and HCs was analyzed via the independent-sample t test, whereas the paired-sample t test was employed to analyze the network metric changes in PSCI patients before vs. after treatment. 
    <b>Results:</b> Small-world network attributes were observed in both groups for sparsities between 0.1 and 0.28. Compared with the HC group, the PSCI group presented significantly lower values for the global topological properties (γ, Cp, and Eloc) of the brain; significantly greater values for the nodal attributes of betweenness centrality in the CUN. L and the HES. R, degree centrality in the SFGdor. L, PCG. L, IPL. L, and HES. R, and nodal local efficiency in the ORBsup. R, ORBsupmed. R, DCG. L, SMG. R, and TPOsup. L; and decreased degree centrality in the MFG. R, IFGoperc. R, and SOG. R. After treatment, PSCI patients presented increased degree centrality in the LING.L, LING.R, and IOG. L and nodal local efficiency in PHG. L, IOG. R, FFG. L, and the HES. L, and decreased betweenness centrality in the PCG. L and CUN. L, degree centrality in the ORBsupmed. R, and nodal local efficiency in ANG. R.
    <b> Conclusion: </b>Cognitive decline in PSCI patients may be related to BFN disorders; acupuncture therapy may modulate the topological properties of the BFNs of PSCI patients. 
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Cognitive Decline
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Poststroke Cognitive Impairment
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Brain Functional Network
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Graph Theoretical Analysis
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Poststroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is a very common problem among individuals who experience stroke that severely impacts their activities of daily living while imposing heavy burdens on society and families <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-1">
     [1]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. Many studies have shown that acupuncture has positive effects on PSCI <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-3">
     [3]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-14">
     [14]
    </xref>. Advances in imaging technologies have provided new approaches, including resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI), for investigating the structure and function of the brain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-15">
     [15]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-19">
     [19]
    </xref>. In graph theory-based brain functional network (BFN) analysis, a specific, complex BFN is abstracted onto a network graph composed of node sets and section sets, in which brain regions act as nodes and the structural or functional connection information between two nodes acts as sections <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-20">
     [20]
    </xref>. Studying BFNs in this way can reveal mechanisms of action in different brain regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-21">
     [21]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-23">
     [23]
    </xref>, making it a vital method for investigating the key pathological process of stroke and the mechanism underlying the effect of acupuncture therapy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-24">
     [24]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-25">
     [25]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>However, few studies have addressed BFN changes in PSCI patients after acupuncture therapy. This study investigated BFN changes in patients with PSCI after acupuncture therapy via graph theoretical analysis.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Clinical Data</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-"></xref>In this study, 22 PSCI patients who underwent acupuncture therapy at our hospital were enrolled. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) first-onset PSCI and the diagnostic criteria for cerebral infarction, 2) right-handedness, 3) Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score &lt; 26 points and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score &lt; 24 points, and 4) consciousness with stable vital signs. The exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) restroke or hemorrhagic stroke confirmed by imaging; 2) mental illness such as depression, hysteria, or obvious hypophrenia before stroke onset; 3) inability to receive acupuncture therapy or fainting during acupuncture therapy; 4) severe cardiopulmonary or renal dysfunction, blood diseases, or coagulation abnormalities; 5) contraindications to MRI or claustrophobia; and 6) other conditions hindering image acquisition or data quality. All PSCI patients were subjected to the MMSE and MoCA, which were administered by the same experienced neurologist. Fourteen healthy controls (HCs) matched for age, sex, and education level were enrolled in this study. All the subjects signed informed consent forms.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Rs-fMRI Scan</title>
    <p>All the subjects underwent T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) and rs-fMRI scans with a magnetic resonance scanner equipped with a 32-channel head–neck coil (MR750 3.0 T, GE). For PSCI patients, rs-fMRI scans were conducted at baseline and 2 weeks after acupuncture therapy. The T1WI scanning parameters were as follows: repetition time (TR) = 8.2 ms, echo time (TE) = 3.1 ms, field of view (FOV) = 256 × 256 mm, slice thickness = 1 mm, slice increment = 0, matrix = 256 × 256, flip angle = 7˚, and time = 3 min 59 s. The rs-fMRI scanning parameters were as follows: TR = 2000 ms, TE = 30 ms, FOV = 230 × 230 mm, slice thickness = 3.5 mm, slice increment = 0.7 mm, matrix = 64 × 64, flip angle = 90˚, and time = 8 min 10 s.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Acupuncture Scheme</title>
    <p>Acupoints were selected with reference to specific meridians and known acupoints. The acupuncture was performed with disposable sterile 0.35 × 50 mm acupuncture needles as follows. After routine disinfection, the bilateral Neiguan acupoints were first punctured straight to a depth of 20 - 25 mm. After the desired sensation was achieved, the neutral supplementation and draining method was performed, and the needles were twirled 120 times/min continuously for 1 min, after which they were left in place for 30 min. Next, the Baihui and Sishencong acupoints were horizontally punctured to a depth of 20 - 25 mm to reach the galea aponeurotica from front to back. After the desired sensation was achieved, the needles were twirled at a small amplitude and a frequency of 200 times/min continuously for 1 min and then left in place for 30 min. Acupuncture was performed by the same acupuncture therapist at 8:00 - 10:00 in the morning once a day, 5 days a week for a total of 2 weeks.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_4">
    <title>2.4. Data Processing</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-"></xref>The data were preprocessed with the DPABI software package of the MATLAB platform as follows <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-26">
      [26]
     </xref>. 1) Data from the first 10 time points were removed to avoid the effects of environmental variations or unstable magnetic fields and ensure signal stability. 2) Time correction was performed by aligning all image layers of each result to the time point in the middle of the scan. 3) Head motion correction was performed, and the data of subjects with head rotation &gt; 2˚ or translation &gt; 2 mm in the x-, y-, or z-directions were excluded. 4) The brain images of each subject were registered to standard Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space and then resampled to a voxel size of 3 mm × 3 mm × 3 mm. 5) Linear drift was removed to reduce the baseline drift caused by the machine. 6) Covariates were removed to eliminate the additional effects of head movement, white matter signals, and cerebrospinal fluid signals. 7) All the data were subjected to bandpass filtering between 0.01 and 0.08 Hz to remove high-frequency signals and physiological noise.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_5">
    <title>2.5. Graph Theoretical Analysis</title>
    <p>The brain images of all the subjects were registered to the anatomical automatic labeling (AAL) template with GRETNA on the MATLAB platform <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-27">
      [27]
     </xref>. In this template, the whole brain was divided into 90 brain regions, in which each node corresponds to one region. Then, the average time series of all voxels in the 90 brain regions were extracted, and the Pearson correlation coefficients of the average time series between every two brain regions were calculated, yielding a 90 × 90 matrix R. Next, matrix R was subjected to Fisher Z-transformation, yielding a Z value correlation matrix that was almost normally distributed. Network sparsity, the ratio of the number of sections in a network to the maximum number of possible sections in the network, was adopted to determine the BFN thresholds. The lower limit of the threshold should meet the criterion that the average degree of all nodes in a BFN of each subject is greater than 2 log(N), where N is the number of nodes, and the upper limit of the threshold should meet the criterion that the parameter of the small-world topological properties of each BFN is greater than 1.1 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-28">
      [28]
     </xref>. For this reason, the range of sparsity was set to 0.1 - 0.28 in this study, with a step size of 0.01.</p>
    <p>The area under the curve (AUC) of the whole-brain topological properties (σ, γ, λ, C<sub>p</sub>, L<sub>p</sub>, E<sub>loc</sub>, and E<sub>g</sub>) and node properties (betweenness centrality, degree centrality, and nodal local efficiency) in each group was calculated with GRETNA <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-29">
      [29]
     </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-31">
      [31]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_6">
    <title>2.6. Statistical Analysis</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-"></xref>Data analysis was performed with SPSS 25.0 software. The chi-square test and independent-sample t test or paired-sample t test were employed to compare enumeration data and quantitative data, respectively, between groups. Indicators with differences between groups in terms of whole-brain topological properties and node properties were subjected to Pearson correlation analysis with the MMSE and MoCA scores. For all the statistical results, p &lt; 0.05 denoted statistical significance.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Clinical Characteristics</title>
    <p>A total of 22 PSCI patients and 14 HCs were included in this study; the demographic and clinical characteristics of the included individuals are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>. Compared with the pretreatment scores, the posttreatment MMSE and MoCA scores of the PSCI patients were significantly greater (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-"></xref>Table 1. Clinical characteristics of the PSCI and HC groups.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="32.40%">Clinical characteristics<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.78%">PSCI<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.78%">HC<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.00%">t<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.00%">p<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="32.40%">Sex (males/females)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.78%">11/11<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.78%">4/10<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.00%">3.653<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.00%">0.056<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="32.40%">Age (years)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.78%">60.1 ± 8.4<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.78%">56.7 ± 4.6<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.00%">1.429<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.00%">0.163<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="32.40%">Education level (years)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.78%">5.8 ± 3.4<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.78%">7.7 ± 3.6<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.00%">0.801<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.00%">0.132<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-"></xref>Table 2. Comparison of clinical scale scores in PSCI patients before and after treatment.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="23.28%">Clinical scale scores<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="23.28%">Before treatment<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="23.29%">After treatment<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="13.88%">t<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.27%">p<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.28%">MMSE<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.28%">18.14 ± 3.14<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.29%">22.00 ± 2.60<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.88%">−5.332<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.27%">0.000<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.28%">MoCA<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.28%">15.91 ± 3.26<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.29%">20.05 ± 3.36<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.88%">−7.343<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.27%">0.000<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Notes: MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination. MoCA: Montreal Cognitive Assessment.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Global Topological Properties</title>
    <p>Small-world network attributes were observed in both groups for sparsity values between 0.1 and 0.28. Compared with HCs, PSCI patients had decreased values for the network metric γ (p = 0.024), the clustering coefficient (C<sub>p</sub>) (p = 0.038), and E<sub>loc</sub> (p = 0.025).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Comparison of Nodal Attributes</title>
    <p>The betweenness centrality in the left cuneus (CUN. L) and right Heschl’s gyrus (HES. R) was greater in PSCI patients than in HCs over the entire threshold range (p &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>). After treatment, PSCI patients had lower betweenness centrality in the PCG.L and CUN. L (p &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-"></xref>Table 3. Comparison of topological properties between PSCI patients before treatment and HCs.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="11.76%">Parameters<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="16.10%">Brain region<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.79%" colspan="3">MNI coordinate<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="13.98%">Control group<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="12.14%">PSCI patients<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="10.38%">t<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="9.84%">p<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="8.59%">X<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="8.60%">y<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="8.60%">z<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.76%">BC<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.10%">CUN. L<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.59%">−5.93<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.60%">−80.13<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.60%">27.22<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.98%">3.01 ± 1.99<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.14%">9.77 ± 8.94<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="10.38%">−2.568<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.84%">0.002<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.10%">HES. R<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.59%">45.86<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.60%">−17.15<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.60%">10.41<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="13.98%">2.52 ± 1.79<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.14%">6.80 ± 6.36<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="10.38%">−2.615<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.84%">0.003<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="7" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.76%">DC<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.10%">SFGdor. L<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.59%">−18.45<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.60%">34.81<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.60%">42.2<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.98%">1.88 ± 0.84<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.14%">2.92 ± 1.44<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="10.38%">−2.292<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.84%">0.029<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.10%">MFG. R<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.59%">37.59<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.60%">33.06<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.60%">34.04<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.98%">4.68 ± 1.54<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.14%">3.09 ± 1.48<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.38%">2.970<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.84%">0.006<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.10%">IFGoperc. R<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.59%">50.2<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.60%">14.98<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.60%">21.41<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.98%">3.52 ± 1.69<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.14%">2.30 ± 1.28<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.38%">2.353<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.84%">0.025<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.10%">PCG. L<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.59%">−4.85<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.60%">−42.92<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.60%">24.67<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.98%">2.37 ± 1.64<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.14%">3.56 ± 1.63<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.38%">−2.042<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.84%">0.049<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.10%">SOG. R<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.59%">−32.39<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.60%">−80.73<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.60%">16.11<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.98%">5.20 ± 0.95<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.14%">3.93 ± 1.51<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.38%">2.635<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.84%">0.005<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.10%">IPL. L<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.59%">−42.8<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.60%">−45.82<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.60%">46.74<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.98%">3.18 ± 1.57<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.14%">4.30 ± 1.34<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.38%">−2.194<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.84%">0.036<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.10%">HES. R<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.59%">−45.86<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.60%">−17.15<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.60%">10.41<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="13.98%">1.42 ± 0.96<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.14%">2.43 ± 1.21<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="10.38%">−2.483<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.84%">0.018<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="5" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.76%">NLE<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.10%">ORBsup. R<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.59%">18.49<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.60%">48.10<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.60%">−14.02<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.98%">0.11 ± 0.03<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.14%">0.14 ± 0.01<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="10.38%">−3.853<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.84%">0.005<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.10%">ORBsupmed. R<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.59%">8.16<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.60%">51.67<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.60%">−7.13<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.98%">0.13 ± 0.02<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.14%">0.14 ± 0.02<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.38%">−2.039<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.84%">0.049<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.10%">DCG. L<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.59%">−5.48<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.60%">−14.92<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.60%">41.57<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.98%">0.13 ± 0.03<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.14%">0.15 ± 0.01<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.38%">−2.830<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.84%">0.008<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.10%">SMG. R<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.59%">57.61<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.60%">−31.50<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.60%">34.48<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.98%">0.12 ± 0.05<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.14%">0.15 ± 0.01<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.38%">−2.276<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.84%">0.030<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.10%">TPOsup. L<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.59%">−39.88<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.60%">15.14<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.60%">−20.18<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.98%">0.11 ± 0.03<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.14%">0.14 ± 0.02<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.38%">−2.582<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.84%">0.014<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Notes: BC: Betweenness centrality. DC: Degree centrality. NLE: Nodal local efficiency. PSCI: poststroke cognitive impairment. IPL. L: left inferior parietal but supramarginal and angular gyrus. PCG. L: left posterior cingulate gyrus. HES. R: right Heschl’s gyrus. SOG. R: right superior occipital gyrus. IFGoperc. R: right inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis. MFG. R: right middle frontal gyrus. CUN. L: left cuneus. ORBsupmed. R: right superior frontal gyrus, pars medialis orbitalis. ORBsup. R: right superior frontal gyrus, pars orbitalis. DCG. L: left median cingulate and paracingulate gyri. SMG. R: right supramarginal gyrus. TPOsup. L: left temporal pole: superior temporal gyrus.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table4">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
       Table 4
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-"></xref>Table 4. Comparison of topological properties in PSCI patients before and after treatment.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="11.76%">Parameters<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="16.12%">Brain region<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.71%" colspan="3">MNI coordinate<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="15.68%">Before treatment<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="14.52%">After treatment<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="8.10%">t<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="8.10%">p<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="8.57%">x<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="8.57%">y<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="8.57%">z<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.76%">BC<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.12%">PCG. L<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.57%">−4.85<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.57%">−42.92<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.57%">24.67<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.68%">10.36 ± 8.34<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.52%">6.13 ± 5.45<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.10%">2.475<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.10%">0.022<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.12%">CUN. L<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.57%">−5.93<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.57%">−80.13<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.57%">27.22<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.68%">9.77 ± 8.94<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.52%">4.99 ± 4.63<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.10%">2.337<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.10%">0.029<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="4" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.76%">DC<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.12%">ORBsupmed. R<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.57%">8.16<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.57%">51.67<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.57%">−7.13<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.68%">2.70 ± 1.31<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.52%">2.04 ± 1.06<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.10%">2.513<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.10%">0.020<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.12%">LING. L<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%">−14.62<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%">−67.56<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%">−4.63<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.68%">3.79 ± 1.48<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.52%">4.78 ± 1.43<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.10%">−2.717<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.10%">0.013<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.12%">LING. R<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%">16.29<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%">−66.93<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%">−3.87<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.68%">3.91 ± 1.36<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.52%">4.73 ± 1.11<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.10%">−2.298<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.10%">0.032<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.12%">IOG. L<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.57%">−36.36<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.57%">−78.29<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.57%">−7.84<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.68%">2.83 ± 1.68<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.52%">3.78 ± 1.46<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.10%">−2.148<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.10%">0.044<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="5" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.76%">NLE<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.12%">PHG. L<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.57%">−21.17<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.57%">−15.95<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.57%">−20.70<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.68%">0.12 ± 0.05<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.52%">0.15 ± 0.01<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.10%">−2.278<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.10%">0.034<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.12%">IOG. R<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%">38.16<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%">−81.99<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%">−7.61<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.68%">0.14 ± 0.02<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.52%">0.16 ± 0.01<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.10%">−2.960<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.10%">0.008<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.12%">FFG. L<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%">−31.16<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%">−40.30<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%">−20.23<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.68%">0.13 ± 0.02<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.52%">0.14 ± 0.01<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.10%">−2.140<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.10%">0.043<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.12%">ANG. R<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%">45.51<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%">−59.98<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%">38.63<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.68%">0.15 ± 0.01<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.52%">0.13 ± 0.04<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.10%">2.426<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.10%">0.025<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.12%">HES. L<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%">−41.99<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%">−18.88<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%">9.98<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.68%">0.14 ± 0.02<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.52%">0.15 ± 0.01<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.10%">−2.911<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.10%">0.009<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Notes: BC: betweenness centrality. DC: degree centrality. NLE: Nodal local efficiency. PSCI: poststroke cognitive impairment. SFGdor.L: left superior frontal gyrus, dorsolateral. IPL. L: left Inferior parietal, but supramarginal and angular gyri. PCG. L: left posterior cingulate gyrus. HES. R: right Heschl’s gyrus. SOG. R: right superior occipital gyrus. IFGoperc. R: right inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis. CUN. L: left cuneus. HES. L: left Heschl’s gyrus. PHG. L: parahippocampal gyrus. FFG. L: fusiform gyrus. IOG. R: inferior occipital gyrus. ANG. R: angular gyrus. IOG. L: left inferior occipital gyrus. LING. R: right lingual gyrus. ORBsupmed. R: right superior frontal gyrus, pars medialis orbitalis. LING. L: left lingual gyrus.</p>
    <fig-group id="fig1" position="float">
     <fig id="fig1" position="float">
      <label>Figure 1</label>
      <caption>
       <title>(a)--(b)--(c)--(d)--(e)--(f)--Note: Red nodes are brain regions with increases, and blue nodes are brain regions with decreases in the above values. The size of each node represents its t value. PSCI: poststroke cognitive impairment. SFGdor. L: left superior frontal gyrus, dorsolateral. IPL. L: left inferior parietal but supramarginal and angular gyri. PCG. L: left posterior cingulate gyrus. HES. R: right Heschl’s gyrus. SOG. R: right superior occipital gyrus. IFGoperc. R: right inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis. MFG. R: right middle frontal gyrus. CUN. L: left cuneus. HES. L: left Heschl’s gyrus. PHG. L: parahippocampal gyrus. FFG. L: Fusiform gyrus. IOG. R: inferior occipital gyrus. ANG. R: angular gyrus. IOG. L: left inferior occipital gyrus. LING. R: right lingual gyrus. ORBsupmed. R: right superior frontal gyrus, pars medialis orbitalis. ORBsup. R: right superior frontal gyrus, pars orbitalis. DCG. L: left median cingulate and paracingulate gyri. SMG. R: right supramarginal gyrus. TPOsup. L: left temporal pole: superior temporal gyrus. LING. L: left lingual gyrus.--</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/8206641-rId14.jpeg?20240927020550" />
     </fig>
     <fig id="fig1" position="float">
      <label>Figure 1</label>
      <caption>
       <title>(a)--(b)--(c)--(d)--(e)--(f)--Note: Red nodes are brain regions with increases, and blue nodes are brain regions with decreases in the above values. The size of each node represents its t value. PSCI: poststroke cognitive impairment. SFGdor. L: left superior frontal gyrus, dorsolateral. IPL. L: left inferior parietal but supramarginal and angular gyri. PCG. L: left posterior cingulate gyrus. HES. R: right Heschl’s gyrus. SOG. R: right superior occipital gyrus. IFGoperc. R: right inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis. MFG. R: right middle frontal gyrus. CUN. L: left cuneus. HES. L: left Heschl’s gyrus. PHG. L: parahippocampal gyrus. FFG. L: Fusiform gyrus. IOG. R: inferior occipital gyrus. ANG. R: angular gyrus. IOG. L: left inferior occipital gyrus. LING. R: right lingual gyrus. ORBsupmed. R: right superior frontal gyrus, pars medialis orbitalis. ORBsup. R: right superior frontal gyrus, pars orbitalis. DCG. L: left median cingulate and paracingulate gyri. SMG. R: right supramarginal gyrus. TPOsup. L: left temporal pole: superior temporal gyrus. LING. L: left lingual gyrus.--</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/8206641-rId15.jpeg?20240927020550" />
     </fig>
     <fig id="fig1" position="float">
      <label>Figure 1</label>
      <caption>
       <title>(a)--(b)--(c)--(d)--(e)--(f)--Note: Red nodes are brain regions with increases, and blue nodes are brain regions with decreases in the above values. The size of each node represents its t value. PSCI: poststroke cognitive impairment. SFGdor. L: left superior frontal gyrus, dorsolateral. IPL. L: left inferior parietal but supramarginal and angular gyri. PCG. L: left posterior cingulate gyrus. HES. R: right Heschl’s gyrus. SOG. R: right superior occipital gyrus. IFGoperc. R: right inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis. MFG. R: right middle frontal gyrus. CUN. L: left cuneus. HES. L: left Heschl’s gyrus. PHG. L: parahippocampal gyrus. FFG. L: Fusiform gyrus. IOG. R: inferior occipital gyrus. ANG. R: angular gyrus. IOG. L: left inferior occipital gyrus. LING. R: right lingual gyrus. ORBsupmed. R: right superior frontal gyrus, pars medialis orbitalis. ORBsup. R: right superior frontal gyrus, pars orbitalis. DCG. L: left median cingulate and paracingulate gyri. SMG. R: right supramarginal gyrus. TPOsup. L: left temporal pole: superior temporal gyrus. LING. L: left lingual gyrus.--</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/8206641-rId16.jpeg?20240927020551" />
     </fig>
     <fig id="fig1" position="float">
      <label>Figure 1</label>
      <caption>
       <title>(a)--(b)--(c)--(d)--(e)--(f)--Note: Red nodes are brain regions with increases, and blue nodes are brain regions with decreases in the above values. The size of each node represents its t value. PSCI: poststroke cognitive impairment. SFGdor. L: left superior frontal gyrus, dorsolateral. IPL. L: left inferior parietal but supramarginal and angular gyri. PCG. L: left posterior cingulate gyrus. HES. R: right Heschl’s gyrus. SOG. R: right superior occipital gyrus. IFGoperc. R: right inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis. MFG. R: right middle frontal gyrus. CUN. L: left cuneus. HES. L: left Heschl’s gyrus. PHG. L: parahippocampal gyrus. FFG. L: Fusiform gyrus. IOG. R: inferior occipital gyrus. ANG. R: angular gyrus. IOG. L: left inferior occipital gyrus. LING. R: right lingual gyrus. ORBsupmed. R: right superior frontal gyrus, pars medialis orbitalis. ORBsup. R: right superior frontal gyrus, pars orbitalis. DCG. L: left median cingulate and paracingulate gyri. SMG. R: right supramarginal gyrus. TPOsup. L: left temporal pole: superior temporal gyrus. LING. L: left lingual gyrus.--</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/8206641-rId17.jpeg?20240927020551" />
     </fig>
     <fig id="fig1" position="float">
      <label>Figure 1</label>
      <caption>
       <title>(a)--(b)--(c)--(d)--(e)--(f)--Note: Red nodes are brain regions with increases, and blue nodes are brain regions with decreases in the above values. The size of each node represents its t value. PSCI: poststroke cognitive impairment. SFGdor. L: left superior frontal gyrus, dorsolateral. IPL. L: left inferior parietal but supramarginal and angular gyri. PCG. L: left posterior cingulate gyrus. HES. R: right Heschl’s gyrus. SOG. R: right superior occipital gyrus. IFGoperc. R: right inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis. MFG. R: right middle frontal gyrus. CUN. L: left cuneus. HES. L: left Heschl’s gyrus. PHG. L: parahippocampal gyrus. FFG. L: Fusiform gyrus. IOG. R: inferior occipital gyrus. ANG. R: angular gyrus. IOG. L: left inferior occipital gyrus. LING. R: right lingual gyrus. ORBsupmed. R: right superior frontal gyrus, pars medialis orbitalis. ORBsup. R: right superior frontal gyrus, pars orbitalis. DCG. L: left median cingulate and paracingulate gyri. SMG. R: right supramarginal gyrus. TPOsup. L: left temporal pole: superior temporal gyrus. LING. L: left lingual gyrus.--</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/8206641-rId18.jpeg?20240927020551" />
     </fig>
     <fig id="fig1" position="float">
      <label>Figure 1</label>
      <caption>
       <title>(a)--(b)--(c)--(d)--(e)--(f)--Note: Red nodes are brain regions with increases, and blue nodes are brain regions with decreases in the above values. The size of each node represents its t value. PSCI: poststroke cognitive impairment. SFGdor. L: left superior frontal gyrus, dorsolateral. IPL. L: left inferior parietal but supramarginal and angular gyri. PCG. L: left posterior cingulate gyrus. HES. R: right Heschl’s gyrus. SOG. R: right superior occipital gyrus. IFGoperc. R: right inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis. MFG. R: right middle frontal gyrus. CUN. L: left cuneus. HES. L: left Heschl’s gyrus. PHG. L: parahippocampal gyrus. FFG. L: Fusiform gyrus. IOG. R: inferior occipital gyrus. ANG. R: angular gyrus. IOG. L: left inferior occipital gyrus. LING. R: right lingual gyrus. ORBsupmed. R: right superior frontal gyrus, pars medialis orbitalis. ORBsup. R: right superior frontal gyrus, pars orbitalis. DCG. L: left median cingulate and paracingulate gyri. SMG. R: right supramarginal gyrus. TPOsup. L: left temporal pole: superior temporal gyrus. LING. L: left lingual gyrus.--</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/8206641-rId19.jpeg?20240927020551" />
     </fig>
    </fig-group>
    <p>The degree centrality in the left dorsal superior frontal gyrus (SFGdor. L), PCG. L, left inferior parietal lobe (IPL. L), and the HES. R was greater in PSCI patients than in HCs, whereas that in the right medial frontal gyrus (MFG. R), right inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis (IFGoperc.R), and right superior occipital gyrus (SOG.R) was lower in PSCI patients than in HCs (p &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Compared with that before treatment, the degree centrality in the left lingual gyrus (LING. L), right lingual gyrus (LING.R), and left inferior occipital gyrus (IOG. L) was increased, whereas in the right superior frontal gyrus, pars medialis orbitalis (ORBsupmed. R) was decreased after treatment in PSCI patients (p &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>The nodal local efficiency in the right superior frontal gyrus, pars orbitalis (ORBsup. R), ORBsupmed. R, left median cingulate and paracingulate gyri (DCG. L), SMG. R, and left temporal pole: superior temporal gyrus (TPOsup. L) was greater in PSCI patients than in HCs (p &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Compared with that before treatment, the nodal local efficiency in the left parahippocampal gyrus (PHG. L), IOG. R, left fusiform gyrus (FFG. L), and the HES. L was elevated, whereas that in the right angular gyrus (ANG. R) was lower in PSCI patients after treatment (p &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. Relationships between BFN Indicators and Clinical Scale Scores</title>
    <p>The AUC of the nodal local efficiency in the ORBsupmed. R in PSCI patients before treatment was positively correlated with the MoCA score (r = 0.463, p = 0.042), whereas the AUC of the degree centrality in the IOG. L after acupuncture therapy was negatively associated with the MoCA score (r = −0.461, p = 0.031).</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Discussion</title>
   <p>Small-world properties are the basic topological organizational attributes of the human brain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-32">
     [32]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-36">
     [36]
    </xref>. The small-world network is a state between a regular network and a random network <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-37">
     [37]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-39">
     [39]
    </xref>. In patients with certain diseases, BFN attributes maintain small-world characteristics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-32">
     [32]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-39">
     [39]
    </xref>. The BFNs of PSCI patients deviate from the low-cost and efficient operation mode of normal BFNs, in which a balance between functional separation and functional integration is necessary to ensure optimal operation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-40">
     [40]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-44">
     [44]
    </xref>. In the present study, small-world properties were observed in both the PSCI patient and HC groups, and the C<sub>p</sub>, γ, and E<sub>loc</sub> values were lower in the PSCI patients before treatment than in the HCs. The results of the present study are in line with those of the above studies. We speculate that the balance between the functional separation and functional integration of BFNs in PSCI patients is disturbed, manifesting mainly as altered functional separation, which results in cognitive decline <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-44">
     [44]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>This study revealed that the abnormal node centrality in the BFNs of PSCI patients involved mainly the default mode network (DMN) and the executive control network (ECN). A previous study indicated that the DMN and ECN are related to cognitive function <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-45">
     [45]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-52">
     [52]
    </xref>. Our findings suggest that alterations in these brain regions might exert crucial effects on the BFNs of PSCI patients. The results of this study also revealed that node centrality in several brain regions involving the occipital lobe was elevated in PSCI patients after acupuncture therapy compared with before treatment. The occipital lobe is involved mainly in the visual processing of information, whereas the lingual gyrus is also involved in word processing. Zhang et al. analyzed fMRI data and discovered that the degree of activation of the LING. L is positively correlated with the performance of activities related to semantic processing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-53">
     [53]
    </xref>. In some Alzheimer’s disease patients, visual cognitive dysfunction is related to occipital atrophy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-54">
     [54]
    </xref>. In the present study, PSCI patients had increased node centrality in the bilateral LING and the IOG. L after treatment, indicating that acupuncture therapy likely improves cognitive functions related to visual space and language. The greater local efficiency of nodes in all differential brain regions in our PSCI patients before treatment than in the normal controls may reflect a compensatory mechanism, i.e., compensation for functional connectivity loss between distant brain regions via an increase in the number of connections with adjacent brain regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-55">
     [55]
    </xref>. In addition, the nodal local efficiency in the PHG. L, IOG.R, FFG. L, and HES. L was elevated, whereas that in the ANG. R was lowered after treatment in PSCI patients. Such alterations in these brain regions are associated with cognitive tasks, including memory, language, vision, and hearing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-56">
     [56]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-57">
     [57]
    </xref>. One study implicated cognitive impairment in the reduced nodal efficiency in the temporal/parietal lobe of patients with subcortical ischemic cerebrovascular disease and cognitive impairment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-58">
     [58]
    </xref>. The results of this study revealed that the local efficiency of cognition-related nodes was increased in PSCI patients after treatment, which may indicate that acupuncture may improve the cognitive function of these patients.</p>
   <p>Published studies have shown that acupuncture can exert beneficial effects on PSCI <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-3">
     [3]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-14">
     [14]
    </xref>. In the present study, the posttreatment MMSE and MoCA scores of the PSCI patients were significantly greater than the pretreatment scores were. The mechanisms of acupuncture for PSCI may involve antineuronal apoptosis, the promotion of synaptic plasticity, the regulation of brain energy metabolism disorders, etc. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-12">
     [12]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-59">
     [59]
    </xref>. Acupuncture is recommended by the World Health Organization as an alternative and complementary strategy for improving stroke care. However, acupuncture combined with routine therapy is widely used in clinical practice to ensure optimal effects <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-60">
     [60]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-61">
     [61]
    </xref>. In the present study, only basic therapies were combined.</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-"></xref>The present study had the following limitations: 1) The enrolled PSCI patients had mild cognitive impairment, and we did not quantify BFN differences between patients with different degrees of cognitive impairment. 2) The topological properties of BFNs are affected by the template used <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-62">
     [62]
    </xref>. In this study, the classical AAL90 brain atlas was employed as part of the segmentation strategy. In the future, the effects of other templates, such as the AAL116 brain atlas and the Dosenbach 160 brain atlas, should be explored to validate the results. 3) A sham acupuncture group should be established to conduct more complete controlled experiments in future research. In addition, PSCI patients were provided acupuncture treatment 3 - 5 times per week for 4 - 12 weeks in many previous studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-10">
     [10]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136340-63">
     [63]
    </xref>. For various reasons, the PSCI patients in this study were discharged after receiving acupuncture treatment for only two weeks. This study needs to be further improved in the future.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Conclusion</title>
   <p>The results of this study indicate that the cognitive decline in PSCI patients may be related to BFN disorders and that acupuncture therapy may modulate the topological properties of the BFNs of PSCI patients.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>Author Contributions</title>
   <p>Conception, X.-H.H., L.Y., X.-M.Z.; patient recruitment and exploration, R.W., N.L., H.X., P.Z.; data analysis, R.W., N.L.; manuscript writing and revision, R.W., P. Z., L.Y.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s7">
   <title>Funding</title>
   <p>This work was supported by the Project of Scientific Research Development Plan of the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College (No. 2020ZD017; 2020ZD008).</p>
  </sec><sec id="s8">
   <title>Ethics Statement</title>
   <p>This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College (No. 2020ER117-1).</p>
  </sec><sec id="s9">
   <title>Informed Consent Statement</title>
   <p>Informed consent was obtained from all the subjects involved in the study.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s10">
   <title>Data Availability Statement</title>
   <p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s11">
   <title>NOTES</title>
   <p>*Co-first authors.</p>
   <p><sup>#</sup>Corresponding author.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Qu, Y., Zhuo, L., Li, N., Hu, Y., Chen, W., Zhou, Y., et al. (2015) Prevalence of Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment in China: A Community-Based, Cross-Sectional Study. PLOS ONE, 10, e0122864. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122864 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Deramecourt, V. and Pasquier, F. (2014) Neuronal Substrate of Cognitive Impairment in Post-Stroke Dementia. Brain, 137, 2404-2405. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awu188 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Taya, F., Sun, Y., Babiloni, F., Thakor, N. and Bezerianos, A. (2015) Brain Enhancement through Cognitive Training: A New Insight from Brain Connectome. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 9, Article 44. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00044 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sun, P.Y., Cai, R.L., Li, P.F., Zhu, Y., Wang, T., Wu, J., Li, N., Liu, H. and Chu, H.R. (2019) Protective Effects on Hippocampal Neurons and the Influence on Hippocampal Monoamine Neurotransmitters with Acupuncture for Promoting the Circulation of the Governor Vessel and Regulating the Mental State in Rats with Post-Stroke Depression. Chinese Acupuncture&amp;Moxibustion, 39, 741-747. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chavez, L., Huang, S., MacDonald, I., Lin, J., Lee, Y. and Chen, Y. (2017) Mechanisms of Acupuncture Therapy in Ischemic Stroke Rehabilitation: A Literature Review of Basic Studies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18, Article 2270. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112270 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Peng, J., Su, J., Song, L., Lv, Q., Gao, Y., Chang, J., et al. (2023) Altered Functional Activity and Functional Connectivity of Seed Regions Based on ALFF Following Acupuncture Treatment in Patients with Stroke Sequelae with Unilateral Limb Numbness [Corrigendum]. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 19, 367-368. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2147/ndt.s408402 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Liu, F., Hou, Y., Chen, X., Chen, Z., Su, G. and Lin, R. (2024) Moxibustion Promoted Axonal Regeneration and Improved Learning and Memory of Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment by Regulating PI
     <sub>3</sub>K/AKt and TACC
     <sub>3</sub>. Neuroscience, 551, 299-306. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.05.027 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Li, Z.T., Ban, L.Q. and Chen, F. (2023) Acupuncture of Revised Acupoint Combination around the Skull Base for Post-Stroke Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Chinese Acupuncture&amp;Moxibustion, 43, 1104-1108. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhou, Q., Ji, Y., Lv, Y., Xue, J., Wang, Y. and Huang, Y. (2023) Scientific Evidence of Acupuncture for Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 19, 1503-1513. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2147/ndt.s407162 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Li, L., Yang, L., Luo, B., Deng, L., Zhong, Y., Gan, D., et al. (2022) Acupuncture for Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. International Journal of General Medicine, 15, 7249-7264. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s376759 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhuo, P., Huang, L., Lin, M., Chen, J., Dai, Y., Yang, M., et al. (2023) Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture Combined with Rehabilitation Training for Poststroke Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 32, Article 107231. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107231 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Li, N., Wang, H., Liu, H., Zhu, L., Lyu, Z., Qiu, J., et al. (2023) The Effects and Mechanisms of Acupuncture for Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment: Progress and Prospects. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 17, Article 1211044. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1211044 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Liu, Y., Chen, F., Qin, P., Zhao, L., Li, X., Han, J., et al. (2023) Acupuncture Treatment Vs. Cognitive Rehabilitation for Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Frontiers in Neurology, 14, Article 1035125. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1035125 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Huang, J., You, X., Liu, W., Song, C., Lin, X., Zhang, X., et al. (2017) Electroacupuncture Ameliorating Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairments via Inhibition of Peri-Infarct Astroglial and Microglial/Macrophage P2 Purinoceptors-Mediated Neuroinflammation and Hyperplasia. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 17, Article No. 480. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-017-1974-y 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     He, Y. and Evans, A. (2014) Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Healthy and Diseased Brain Networks. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 890. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00890 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wang, H., Huang, Y., Li, M., Yang, H., An, J., Leng, X., et al. (2022) Regional Brain Dysfunction in Insomnia after Ischemic Stroke: A Resting-State fMRI Study. Frontiers in Neurology, 13, Article 1025174. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.1025174 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wang, R., Liu, N., Tao, Y., Gong, X., Zheng, J., Yang, C., et al. (2020) The Application of rs-fMRI in Vascular Cognitive Impairment. Frontiers in Neurology, 11, Article 951. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00951 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wei, B., Huang, X., Ji, Y., Fu, W., Cheng, Q., Shu, B., et al. (2024) Analyzing the Topological Properties of Resting-State Brain Function Network Connectivity Based on Graph Theoretical Methods in Patients with High Myopia. BMC Ophthalmology, 24, Article No. 315. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03592-6 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Liu, X., Qiu, S., Wang, X., Chen, H., Tang, Y. and Qin, Y. (2023) Aberrant Dynamic Functional-Structural Connectivity Coupling of Large-Scale Brain Networks in Poststroke Motor Dysfunction. NeuroImage: Clinical, 37, Article 103332. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103332 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yin, D., Song, F., Xu, D., Sun, L., Men, W., Zang, L., et al. (2013) Altered Topological Properties of the Cortical Motor-Related Network in Patients with Subcortical Stroke Revealed by Graph Theoretical Analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 35, 3343-3359. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22406 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bullmore, E. and Sporns, O. (2009) Complex Brain Networks: Graph Theoretical Analysis of Structural and Functional Systems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 186-198. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2575 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Boot, E.M., Omes, Q.P.M., Maaijwee, N., Schaapsmeerders, P., Arntz, R.M., Rutten-Jacobs, L.C.A., et al. (2023) Functional Brain Connectivity in Young Adults with Post-Stroke Epilepsy. Brain Communications, 5, fcad277. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcad277 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhang, T., Liao, Q., Zhang, D., Zhang, C., Yan, J., Ngetich, R., et al. (2021) Predicting MCI to AD Conversation Using Integrated sMRI and rs-Fmri: Machine Learning and Graph Theory Approach. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 13, Article 688926. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.688926 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rao, B., Wang, S., Yu, M., Chen, L., Miao, G., Zhou, X., et al. (2022) Suboptimal States and Frontoparietal Network-Centered Incomplete Compensation Revealed by Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity in Patients with Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 14, Article 893297. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.893297 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Xu, M., Qian, L., Wang, S., Cai, H., Sun, Y., Thakor, N., et al. (2023) Brain Network Analysis Reveals Convergent and Divergent Aberrations between Mild Stroke Patients with Cortical and Subcortical Infarcts during Cognitive Task Performing. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 15, Article 1193292. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2023.1193292 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yan, C., Wang, X., Zuo, X. and Zang, Y. (2016) DPABI: Data Processing&amp;Analysis for (Resting-State) Brain Imaging. Neuroinformatics, 14, 339-351. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-016-9299-4 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Landeau, B., Papathanassiou, D., Crivello, F., Etard, O., Delcroix, N., et al. (2002) Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain. NeuroImage, 15, 273-289. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0978 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yu, M., Dai, Z., Tang, X., Wang, X., Zhang, X., Sha, W., et al. (2017) Convergence and Divergence of Brain Network Dysfunction in Deficit and Non-Deficit Schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 43, 1315-1328. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbx014 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fornito, A., Zalesky, A. and Breakspear, M. (2013) Graph Analysis of the Human Connectome: Promise, Progress, and Pitfalls. NeuroImage, 80, 426-444. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.087 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Watts, D.J. and Strogatz, S.H. (1998) Collective Dynamics of ‘Small-World’ Networks. Nature, 393, 440-442. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/30918 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Humphries, M.D., Gurney, K. and Prescott, T.J. (2005) The Brainstem Reticular Formation Is a Small-World, Not Scale-Free, Network. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273, 503-511. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3354 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wang, Z., Yuan, Y., Bai, F., You, J. and Zhang, Z. (2016) Altered Topological Patterns of Brain Networks in Remitted Late-Onset Depression. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 77, 123-130. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.14m09344 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tao, Y., Ficek, B., Rapp, B. and Tsapkini, K. (2020) Different Patterns of Functional Network Reorganization across the Variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Graph-Theoretic Analysis. Neurobiology of Aging, 96, 184-196. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.09.007 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     He, S., Liu, Z., Xu, Z., Duan, R., Yuan, L., Xiao, C., et al. (2020) Brain Functional Network in Chronic Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis and Occlusion: Changes and Compensation. Neural Plasticity, 2020, 1-11. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9345602 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bahrami, N., Seibert, T.M., Karunamuni, R., Bartsch, H., Krishnan, A., Farid, N., et al. (2017) Altered Network Topology in Patients with Primary Brain Tumors after Fractionated Radiotherapy. Brain Connectivity, 7, 299-308. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2017.0494 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wang, J., Chen, Y., Liang, H., Niedermayer, G., Chen, H., Li, Y., et al. (2019) The Role of Disturbed Small-World Networks in Patients with White Matter Lesions and Cognitive Impairment Revealed by Resting State Function Magnetic Resonance Images (rs-fMRI). Medical Science Monitor, 25, 341-356. &gt;https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.913396 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Telesford, Q.K., Joyce, K.E., Hayasaka, S., Burdette, J.H. and Laurienti, P.J. (2011) The Ubiquity of Small-World Networks. Brain Connect, 1, 367-375. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2011.0038 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bullmore, E.T. and Bassett, D.S. (2011) Brain Graphs: Graphical Models of the Human Brain Connectome. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 7, 113-140. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-040510-143934 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wang, Q., Su, T., Zhou, Y., Chou, K., Chen, I., Jiang, T., et al. (2012) Anatomical Insights into Disrupted Small-World Networks in Schizophrenia. NeuroImage, 59, 1085-1093. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.035 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhu, Y., Bai, L., Liang, P., Kang, S., Gao, H. and Yang, H. (2016) Disrupted Brain Connectivity Networks in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 11, 444-453. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-016-9525-6 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref41">
    <label>41</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Shi, M., Liu, S., Chen, H., Geng, W., Yin, X., Chen, Y., et al. (2020) Disrupted Brain Functional Network Topology in Unilateral Acute Brainstem Ischemic Stroke. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 15, 444-452. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-020-00353-z 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref42">
    <label>42</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Xu, J., Chen, F., Lei, D., Zhan, W., Sun, X., Suo, X., et al. (2018) Disrupted Functional Network Topology in Children and Adolescents with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, Article 709. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00709 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref43">
    <label>43</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Siegel, J.S., Seitzman, B.A., Ramsey, L.E., Ortega, M., Gordon, E.M., Dosenbach, N.U.F., et al. (2018) Re-Emergence of Modular Brain Networks in Stroke Recovery. Cortex, 101, 44-59. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.12.019 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref44">
    <label>44</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yu, Y., Zhou, X., Wang, H., Hu, X., Zhu, X., Xu, L., et al. (2015) Small-World Brain Network and Dynamic Functional Distribution in Patients with Subcortical Vascular Cognitive Impairment. PLOS ONE, 10, e0131893. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131893 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref45">
    <label>45</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Liu, Y., Yang, K., Hu, X., Xiao, C., Rao, J., Li, Z., et al. (2020) Altered Rich-Club Organization and Regional Topology Are Associated with Cognitive Decline in Patients with Frontal and Temporal Gliomas. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, Article 23. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00023 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref46">
    <label>46</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zuo, X., Ehmke, R., Mennes, M., Imperati, D., Castellanos, F.X., Sporns, O., et al. (2011) Network Centrality in the Human Functional Connectome. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 1862-1875. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr269 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref47">
    <label>47</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rubinov, M. and Sporns, O. (2010) Complex Network Measures of Brain Connectivity: Uses and Interpretations. NeuroImage, 52, 1059-1069. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref48">
    <label>48</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhu, Y., Lu, T., Xie, C., Wang, Q., Wang, Y., Cao, X., et al. (2020) Functional Disorganization of Small-World Brain Networks in Patients with Ischemic Leukoaraiosis. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 12, Article 203. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.00203 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref49">
    <label>49</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fransson, P. and Marrelec, G. (2008) The Precuneus/Posterior Cingulate Cortex Plays a Pivotal Role in the Default Mode Network: Evidence from a Partial Correlation Network Analysis. NeuroImage, 42, 1178-1184. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.059 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref50">
    <label>50</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, L., Sang, L., Yang, J., Yan, R., et al. (2017) Disrupted Structural and Functional Connectivity Networks in Ischemic Stroke Patients. Neuroscience, 364, 212-225. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.09.009 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref51">
    <label>51</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Li, Q., Liu, J., Wang, W., Wang, Y., Li, W., Chen, J., et al. (2018) Disrupted Coupling of Large-Scale Networks Is Associated with Relapse Behaviour in Heroin-Dependent Men. Journal of Psychiatry&amp;Neuroscience, 43, 48-57. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.170011 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref52">
    <label>52</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Seeley, W.W., Menon, V., Schatzberg, A.F., Keller, J., Glover, G.H., Kenna, H., et al. (2007) Dissociable Intrinsic Connectivity Networks for Salience Processing and Executive Control. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 2349-2356. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.5587-06.2007 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref53">
    <label>53</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhang, H., Liu, J. and Zhang, Q. (2014) Neural Representations for the Generation of Inventive Conceptions Inspired by Adaptive Feature Optimization of Biological Species. Cortex, 50, 162-173. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.01.015 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref54">
    <label>54</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Putcha, D., Brickhouse, M., Touroutoglou, A., Collins, J.A., Quimby, M., Wong, B., et al. (2019) Visual Cognition in Non-Amnestic Alzheimer’s Disease: Relations to Tau, Amyloid, and Cortical Atrophy. NeuroImage: Clinical, 23, Article 101889. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101889 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref55">
    <label>55</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mijalkov, M., Kakaei, E., Pereira, J.B., Westman, E. and Volpe, G. (2017) BRAPH: A Graph Theory Software for the Analysis of Brain Connectivity. PLOS ONE, 12, e178798.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref56">
    <label>56</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Baldassano, C., Beck, D.M. and Fei-Fei, L. (2013) Differential Connectivity within the Parahippocampal Place Area. NeuroImage, 75, 228-237. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.073 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref57">
    <label>57</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Weiner, K.S. and Zilles, K. (2016) The Anatomical and Functional Specialization of the Fusiform Gyrus. Neuropsychologia, 83, 48-62. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.06.033 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref58">
    <label>58</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sang, L., Chen, L., Wang, L., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Li, P., et al. (2018) Progressively Disrupted Brain Functional Connectivity Network in Subcortical Ischemic Vascular Cognitive Impairment Patients. Frontiers in Neurology, 9, Article 94. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00094 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref59">
    <label>59</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cabioglu, M.T. (2016) Acupuncture Practices and Brain Waves. Open Access Library, 3, 1-4. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1102639 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref60">
    <label>60</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wu, W., Song, C., Yang, Y., Hu, Y. and Lin, H. (2024) Acupuncture for Cognitive Impairment after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Heliyon, 10, e30522. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30522 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref61">
    <label>61</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wang, Z., Sun, Z., Zhang, M., Xiong, K. and Zhou, F. (2022) Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Acupuncture in the Treatment of Cognitive Impairment after Stroke. Medicine, 101, e30461. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000030461 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref62">
    <label>62</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wang, J., Wang, L., Zang, Y., Yang, H., Tang, H., Gong, Q., et al. (2008) Parcellation-Dependent Small-World Brain Functional Networks: A Resting-State fMRI Study. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 1511-1523. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20623 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136340-ref63">
    <label>63</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Du, Y., Zhang, L., Liu, W., Rao, C., Li, B., Nan, X., et al. (2020) Effect of Acupuncture Treatment on Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment. Medicine, 99, e23803. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000023803
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>