<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    jst
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Journal of Sensor Technology
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2161-122X
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2161-1238
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/jst.2024.143003
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    jst-136176
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Computer Science 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Communications
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    A Glassy Carbon Electrode Modified with Cellulose Nanofibrils from Ammophila arenaria for the Sensitive Detection of L-Trytophan
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Sondes
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Bourigua
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Feriel
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Boussema
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Zayneb
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Jebali
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Houcine
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Barhoumi
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Hatem
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Majdoub
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Abderrazak
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Maaref
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Nicole
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Jaffrezic-Renault
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aLaboratory of Advanced Materials and Interfaces, Faculty of Sciences, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aInstitute of Analytical Sciences, University of Lyon, Villeurbanne, France
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     24
    </day> 
    <month>
     09
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    14
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    03
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    35
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    50
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      5,
     </day>
     <month>
      August
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      21,
     </day>
     <month>
      August
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      21,
     </day>
     <month>
      September
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    L-tryptophan is an essential amino acid for human health. Nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) from marram grass (Ammophila arenaria) extracted from plants harvested in the center of Tunisia was used for the first time for the modification of a glassy carbon electrode (GCE), for the sensitive detection of L-tryptophan (Trp). After spectroscopic and morphological characterization of the extracted NFC, the GC electrode modification was monitored through cyclic voltammetry. The NFC-modified electrode exhibited good analytical performance in detecting Trp with a wide linear range between 7.5 × 10
    <sup>−4</sup> mM and 10
    <sup>−2</sup> mM, a detection limit of 0.2 µM, and a high sensitivity of 140.0 µA∙mM
    <sup>−1</sup>. Additionally, the NFC/GCE showed a good reproducibility, good selectivity versus other amino acids, uric acid, ascorbic acid, and good applicability to the detection of Trp in urine samples. 
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Nanofibrillated Cellulose
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Chitosan
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Chemically Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Electrochemical Detection
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      L-Tryptophan
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>The detection of amino acids is important in different fields of research: medicine, food, biotechnology, and wine industries. L-Tryptophan (Trp) whose standard chemical name is (2S)-2-amino-3-(1H-indol-3-yl) propanoic acid and the molecu-lar formula is C<sub>11</sub>H<sub>12</sub>N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (molecular weight: 204.22 g/mole), is an essential amino acid with biochemical, nutritional, and medical significance for humans <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. It is important for normal growth in infants and nitrogen balance in adults <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. L-tryptophan (Trp) is considered a “necessary” amino acid since the body cannot produce it on its own <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-3">
     [3]
    </xref>, it can only be obtained through food or supplementation. Trp is present in a wide variety of protein-containing foods such as milk, egg, poultry, cheese, nuts, bananas, and fish <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. It is a precursor for niacin, melatonin, and serotonin, these molecules being involved in regulating mood <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-5">
     [5]
    </xref>. Consequently, it has been reported that abnormal levels of Tryptophan may cause several serious diseases including delusions and hallucinations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. Furthermore, taking an overdose of tryptophan induces dizziness, drowsiness, loss of appetite, nausea, and hepatic disease <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. The World Health Organization (WHO) suggests daily consumption of 4 mg/kg of body weight of Trp <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. Trp is also a biomarker of certain diseases; lower concentrations of Trp were observed in plasma from patients with Alzheimer’s disease <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-7">
     [7]
    </xref>, with colorectal and prostate cancer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-8">
     [8]
    </xref>. Hence, the sensitive and selective determination of tryptophan is essential in medicine and food products. Different analytical techniques are used to determine Trp, including high-pressure liquid chromatography <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-9">
     [9]
    </xref>, chemiluminescence <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-10">
     [10]
    </xref>, capillary electrophoresis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-11">
     [11]
    </xref>, and spectroscopic detection <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-12">
     [12]
    </xref>. Still, they require complicated and expensive equipment, multi-step sample treatment, and are time-consuming. As tryptophan is electroactive, a highly sensitive, selective, simple, low cost and quick-responding electrochemical method would gain more attention.</p>
   <p>However, it is still difficult to measure tryptophan directly at unmodified electrodes due to the slowness of the redox process which leads to high overpotential at the electrode <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-13">
     [13]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-14">
     [14]
    </xref>. Therefore, fabricating modified electrodes using highly conductive and catalytic materials is very important to reduce the overpotential and enhance the electrochemical response. For the electrochemical detection of Trp, different kinds of synthesized nanomaterials were used to modify the electrodes including metal/metal oxide nanoparticles, conductive polymers, and carbon-based nanomaterials <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-15">
     [15]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Because of the availability of natural polymers and their numerous qualities: biocompatible, biodegradable, low cost, and nontoxic, they have been used in various formulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-16">
     [16]
    </xref>. Different polysaccharides have been used to modify electrodes such as cellulose <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-17">
     [17]
    </xref>, alginate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-18">
     [18]
    </xref>, chitin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-19">
     [19]
    </xref>, chitosan <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-20">
     [20]
    </xref> and pectin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-21">
     [21]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Cellulose is the major component—around 35% - 50%—in the lignocellulosic biomass, mainly localized in the plant cell wall. It is composed of the linear homopolysaccharide of b-1,4-linked anhydro-D-glucose units. In cellulose fibers, there are some crystalline parts where the chain molecules are orderly packed, called nanofibrils. Recently, nanofibrillated cellulose has gained attention in both research and industrial areas, due to its attractive properties, such as excellent mechanical properties, high surface area, high density of hydroxyl groups for modi-fication properties, ionic conductivity, transparency, with 100% environmental friendliness. Nanocellulose is a natural nanomaterial that can be extracted from the plant cell wall <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-22">
     [22]
    </xref>. It exists in a quasi-pure state in the form of cotton seed hair, but most often is found combined with other polysaccharides. The nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) was produced by mechanically treating cellulose suspensions through high-pressure homogenizers. The typical cross-section of nanofibrils ranges from 4 to 20 nm depending on their origin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-23">
     [23]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-24">
     [24]
    </xref>. NFC has been used for the modification of carbonaceous electrodes, for the sensitive electrochemical detection of metal ions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-25">
     [25]
    </xref>, and of atrazine <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-26">
     [26]
    </xref>. A NFC/RGO nanocomposite has been used for the electrochemical detection of fenitrothion organophosphorus pesticide <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-27">
     [27]
    </xref> and for the detection of p-nitrophenol <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-28">
     [28]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>In this work, the NFC-modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE) was built and used for the electrochemical detection of tryptophan, for the first time. The modification of the GCE was carried out with the encapsulation of NFC in a chitosan (CS) film for higher stability and greater detection sensitivity. The electron transfer during the redox reaction of Trp on the CS/NFC-modified GCE was characterized. After the analytical performance of the CS/NFC-modified GCE was determined, it was applied to the detection of Trp in real urine samples.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Experimental</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Chemicals and Reagents</title>
    <p>K<sub>4</sub>Fe(CN)<sub>6</sub>∙3H<sub>2</sub>O, K<sub>3</sub>Fe(CN)<sub>6</sub>, KCl, L-tryptophan, uric acid, ascorbic acid, and chitosan were purchased from Fluka Chemika. TEMPO (2,2,6,6,-tetramethylpiperidine 1-pxyl) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The buffer solution used for all experiments was phosphate buffer saline (PBS) containing 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 0.01 M KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> and 0.01 M K<sub>2</sub>HPO<sub>4</sub>, pH 7. All solutions were prepared in ultrapure water (resistance 18.2 MW∙cm<sup>−1</sup>) produced by a Millipore Milli-Q system. The NFC material was extracted from marram grass (Ammophila arenaria) collected in the central western area of Tunisia (Gafsa).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Instrumentation</title>
    <p>Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra (from 4000 to 400 cm<sup>−1</sup>) were obtained using a BX FTIR system spectrometer, Perkin Elmer Company, Waltham, MA, USA. KBr pellets technique was used for sample preparation.</p>
    <p>The transmission electron microscope (TEM) image of the extracted NFCs was taken using a Jeol 200 CX transmission electron microscope at 80 kV. About 0.5 µL of diluted suspension of NFC (about 0.1%) was deposited onto a 300 mesh carbon-coated grid.</p>
    <p>X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were collected by a Bruker diffractometer (D8 Advance, Germany) with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 0.1548 nm).</p>
    <p>Electrochemical experiments were carried out using an Autolab (PGSTAT 302 N, Eco Chemie). All measurements were performed in a dark Faraday cage at room temperature. A conventional three-electrode system consisting of a platinum counter-electrode, an Ag/AgCl/KCl as the reference electrode, and a glassy carbon electrode (GCE, f 3 mm) as the working electrode was used. Differential Pulse Voltammetric (DPV) measurements were carried out at a scan rate of 50 mV/s with an accumulation time of 20 s.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Production of NFC</title>
    <p>By a conventional soda-pulling process and bleaching treatment, the cellulose fibers were extracted from Marram grass, then the fibers were treated by TEMPO-mediated oxidation to generate carboxyl groups. Oxidation was carried out at pH 10 following the previously reported method (Jebali et al., 2018). Briefly, 5 g of fibers were dispersed in 500 mL sodium phosphate buffer (0.05 mol∙L<sup>−1</sup>, pH 7) containing 25 mg of TEMPO and 250 mg of NaBr. Then 1.13 g of NaCl (80%) and 2 mol∙L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> of NaClO were added to the flask in one step and the suspension was left under magnetic stirring at 60˚C for 6 h. At the end of the oxidation reaction, 100 mL of ethanol was added and the obtained modified fibers were filtered. This operation was carried out several times with water to remove any salt. Then a suspension of 1.5 wt% of prepared fibers was homogenized in a high-pressure homogenizer from GEA (NS 1001 L PANDA 2 K-GEA, Italy). After six shear cycles (3 × 30 bar; 3 × 600 bar), a thick transparent NFC-COO<sup>−</sup> gel was obtained <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-24">
      [24]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_4">
    <title>2.4. Functionalization of the Glassy Carbon Electrode</title>
    <p>Before the electrode modification, the bare glassy carbon electrode (GCE) was polished with 0.5 µm alumina solution. The GCE was then fully rinsed with water and sonicated in ethanol and deionized water for 3 min. Next, the GCE was scanned in 0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, at 50 mV/s for many cycles between −0.2 V and 1.3 V.</p>
    <p>Subsequently, 5 µL of CS (the optimized concentration, 1 mg/mL) solution was deposited on the GCE, then 5 µL of NFC (optimized concentration: 1 mg/mL) was deposited on the CS/GCE. The obtained CS/NFC modified surface was dried for 24 hrs at room temperature.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results and Discussion</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. FTIR Characterization of NFC</title>
    <p>The Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectrum of NFC is illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref> and shows distinct absorption bands. The bands located at 3330 cm<sup>−1</sup> were attributed to O–H stretching vibration. The band at 2906 cm<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> was assigned to the aliphatic C–H -stretching vibration and the band at 1660 cm<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> associated with the O–H bending vibration of absorbed water. CNF showed a band at 1614 cm<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, which was likely due to the introduction of carboxylic groups into the primary alcohol groups on the surface of cellulose nanoﬁbrils after TEMPO mediated oxidation. The characteristic bands of the glucosic ring appear in the 1000 - 1162 cm<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> region.</p>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 1. The Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectrum of NFC.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4200292-rId12.jpeg?20240924015307" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Morphological Characterization of NFC</title>
    <p>The morphological features of CNF were assessed by TEM observation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2(a)">
      Figure 2(a)
     </xref>). Nanosized fibrils with a width distribution centered around 3 - 6 nm are observed which is a good indication that the individual fibrils correspond to elementary cellulose fibrils composed of altered amorphous and crystalline domains. The crystalline structure of NFC was confirmed through X-ray diffraction (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2(b)">
      Figure 2(b)
     </xref>); a strong peak is observed at 18˚ corresponding to the 002 plane <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-26">
      [26]
     </xref>.</p>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a) (b)Figure 2. (a) TEM observation of NFC; (b) XRD spectrum of NFC.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a) (b)Figure 2. (a) TEM observation of NFC; (b) XRD spectrum of NFC.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4200292-rId13.jpeg?20240924015308" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a) (b)Figure 2. (a) TEM observation of NFC; (b) XRD spectrum of NFC.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4200292-rId14.jpeg?20240924015308" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Electrochemical Characterization of NFC/CS Modified GCE</title>
    <p>The electrochemical behavior of the different modified electrodes was examined by cyclic voltammetry (CV). As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref>, a pair of reversible and well-defined redox peaks was observed on the bare GCE, with a ΔEp of 100 mV and an intensity ratio of about 1:1 between anodic and cathodic peak currents demonstrating that the glassy carbon electrode (GCE) has a quasi-reversible electrochemical reaction with the [Fe(CN)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>3−/4−</sup> couple <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-26">
      [26]
     </xref>. The redox currents decreased significantly after the GCE was modified with CS/NFC, proving the electrode modification.</p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 3. Cyclic voltammograms of modified and unmodified GCE with NFC and CS in 0.1 M KCl solution containing 5 mM [Fe(CN)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>3−/4−</sup> at scan rate of 50 mV∙s<sup>−1</sup>.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4200292-rId15.jpeg?20240924015308" />
    </fig>
    <p>So, with the integration of NFCs and CS, the synergistic effect then took place at this electrochemical platform, leading to increased adsorption of electrochemically active sites, and of the effective electrode area.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. Electrochemical Behaviour of L-Tryptophan</title>
    <p>To determine the electrochemical behavior of 0.1 mM Trp in phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0) on a GCE, CS/GCE, NFC/GCE, and a CS/NFC/GCE, cyclic voltammetry was investigated. From the electrochemical results shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4(a)">
      Figure 4(a)
     </xref>, it can be seen that Trp presents only one oxidation peak. No reduction peak was observed in the reverse scan, confirming that the electrochemical reaction is an irreversible process, in agreement with previous results <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-29">
      [29]
     </xref>. As can be seen from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4(a)">
      Figure 4(a)
     </xref>, the oxidation peak at the bare GCE appears at 0.75 V, while at the CS/NFC/GCE the peak potential shifted negatively to 0.55 V and the peak current increased significantly. This observation proves that CS/NFC film can catalyze the oxidation of L-Tryptophan. The strong electrostatic attraction between CNF-COO<sup>−</sup> (negatively charged) (pie &lt; 2.8) and Trp molecule (pie = 5.89) can explain the increase in intensity. The conductive properties of NFC (2 mS/cm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-30">
      [30]
     </xref>) explain its role in favoring charge transfer. The DPV peaks presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4(b)">
      Figure 4(b)
     </xref> confirm the results obtained by cyclic voltammetry.</p>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 4. CVs of 0.1 mM of L-Tryptophan on a GCE and a CS/NFCs/GCE at scan rate of 50 mV∙s<sup>−1</sup> (0.01 M phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0)) (a) and DPV of 0.1 mM of L-Tryptophan on a GCE and CS/NFCs/GCE at 50 mV∙s<sup>−1</sup> (0.01 M phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0)) (b).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4200292-rId16.jpeg?20240924015308" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_5">
    <title>3.5. Optimization of the Experimental Conditions for Electrochemical Detection</title>
    <p>By increasing the buffer solution pH from 4.5 to 8.5, the anodic potential gradually decreased which confirms the direct participation of protons in the oxidation reaction of Trp at the CS/NFC/GCE. The anodic peak potential varies linearly with pH value, following this equation:</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-"></xref> 
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mtext>
         Epa 
       </mtext> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mo>
         − 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         55.43 
       </mn> 
       <mtext>
         pH 
       </mtext> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         0.98 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         , 
       </mo> 
       <mtext>
           
       </mtext> 
       <mtext>
           
       </mtext> 
       <msup> 
        <mi>
          R 
        </mi> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
       </msup> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         0.996 
       </mn> 
      </mrow> 
     </math>(1)</p>
    <p>The slope (−55.43 mV/pH) is very close to the theoretical value of 59 mV/pH, showing an equal number of exchanged electrons and protons during the oxidation process.</p>
    <p>The peak current response of Tryp varied also with the change of pH and the maximum peak current is at pH 7.0 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>); for pH higher than 7 the attractivity between Trp (pie 5.89) and NFC decreases. Subsequently, pH 7.0 was considered as the optimal electrolyte solution for the determination of L-Trp.</p>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 5. Effect of pH on peak current of 0.1 mM of L-Tryptophan at CS/NFCs/GCE (0.01 M phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0)).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4200292-rId19.jpeg?20240924015309" />
    </fig>
    <p>CVs of 0.1 mM L-Trp at the CS/NFC/GCE, with various scan rates (20 to 500 mV∙s<sup>−1</sup>) were investigated. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
      Figure 6
     </xref>, the oxidation peak current for L-Tryptophan increases as the scan rate increases, suggesting that the electrocatalytic oxidation of L-Tryptophan at the CS/NFC modified GCE was a typical adsorption-controlled process. The linear relation between the oxidation peak intensity and the scan rate is the following one:</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mtext>
         Ipa 
       </mtext> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ( 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mi>
           μ 
         </mi> 
         <mtext>
           A 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ) 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         2.19 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         0.011 
       </mn> 
       <mi>
         v 
       </mi> 
       <mtext>
           
       </mtext> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ( 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           mV 
         </mtext> 
         <mo>
           ⋅ 
         </mo> 
         <msup> 
          <mtext>
            s 
          </mtext> 
          <mrow> 
           <mo>
             − 
           </mo> 
           <mn>
             1 
           </mn> 
          </mrow> 
         </msup> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ) 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         , 
       </mo> 
       <mtext>
           
       </mtext> 
       <mtext>
           
       </mtext> 
       <msup> 
        <mi>
          R 
        </mi> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
       </msup> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         0.991 
       </mn> 
      </mrow> 
     </math>(2)</p>
    <fig id="fig6" position="float">
     <label>Figure 6</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 6. Effect of scan rate: overlay of cyclic voltammogram for oxidation of L-Trp at different scan rates.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4200292-rId22.jpeg?20240924015310" />
    </fig>
    <p>In addition, the oxidation peak potentials shift positively as the scan rate increases. So, 50 mV/s is employed as the optimal scan rate in the following experiments. The plot of peak current vs. square root of scan rate (v<sup>1/2</sup>) is linear over the whole studied range of scan rate, indicating that the electro-oxidation of Trp at the CS/NFC/GCE was a typical diffusion-controlled process, and the equation can be expressed as:</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mtext>
         Ipa 
       </mtext> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ( 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mi>
           μ 
         </mi> 
         <mtext>
           A 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ) 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         0.35 
       </mn> 
       <msup> 
        <mi>
          v 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mrow> 
          <mn>
            1 
          </mn> 
          <mo>
            / 
          </mo> 
          <mn>
            2 
          </mn> 
         </mrow> 
        </mrow> 
       </msup> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         0.012 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         , 
       </mo> 
       <mtext>
           
       </mtext> 
       <mtext>
           
       </mtext> 
       <msup> 
        <mi>
          R 
        </mi> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
       </msup> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         0.994 
       </mn> 
      </mrow> 
     </math>(3)</p>
    <p>Moreover, the relationship between log (ipa) and log of the scan rate was found to be linear.</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mi>
         log 
       </mi> 
       <mtext>
         ipa 
       </mtext> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ( 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mi>
           μ 
         </mi> 
         <mtext>
           A 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ) 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         0.47 
       </mn> 
       <mi>
         log 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         v 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         − 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         0.39 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         , 
       </mo> 
       <mtext>
           
       </mtext> 
       <mtext>
           
       </mtext> 
       <msup> 
        <mi>
          R 
        </mi> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
       </msup> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         0.990 
       </mn> 
      </mrow> 
     </math>(4)</p>
    <p>given a slope of 0.47 which is in agreement with the theoretical value of 0.5 for a diffusion-controlled process.</p>
    <p>The number of electrons involved in the oxidation of tryptophan was calculated using the equation :</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mtext>
         ipa 
       </mtext> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mi>
           n 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           F 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           Q 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           v 
         </mi> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          / 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mn>
           4 
         </mn> 
         <mi>
           R 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           T 
         </mi> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </math>(5)</p>
    <p>where ipa denotes the anodic peak current, Q denotes the amount of the integrated charge from the area of the voltammetric peak, F is the Faraday constant (96,500 C/mol), T denotes the temperature (298 K), R is the gas constant (8.314 J∙mol<sup>−1</sup>) and n is the number of transferred electrons. From the slope of ip versus v, the number of electrons transferred in the oxidation of L-Trp was calculated to be 1.66. Consequently, the oxidation process of L-Trp involves two electrons and two protons, and the oxidation reaction of Trp is irreversible.</p>
    <p>The anodic peak potential (Epa) versus the logarithm of the scan rate (logv) is a linear relationship:</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mtext>
         Epa 
       </mtext> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         0.044 
       </mn> 
       <mi>
         log 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         v 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         0.54 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         , 
       </mo> 
       <mtext>
           
       </mtext> 
       <mtext>
           
       </mtext> 
       <msup> 
        <mi>
          R 
        </mi> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
       </msup> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         0.991 
       </mn> 
      </mrow> 
     </math>(6)</p>
    <p>Based on Laviron’s relation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-31">
      [31]
     </xref>, the linear plot of Epa versus logv reaches a slope of (2.3RT/αnF), which is equal to 0.044; the value of αn is calculated to be 1.34. According to Equation (7), the calculated α is 0.67.</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mi>
         α 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mn>
           47.7 
         </mn> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          / 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            ( 
          </mo> 
          <mrow> 
           <mtext>
             Epa 
           </mtext> 
           <mo>
             − 
           </mo> 
           <mtext>
             Epa/ 
           </mtext> 
           <mn>
             2 
           </mn> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            ) 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </math>(7)</p>
    <p>where Epa and Epa/2 represent the formal potential and half of the formal potential value respectively.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_6">
    <title>3.6. Electrochemical Determination of L-Tryptophan</title>
    <p>The electrochemical performance of Trp was investigated by Differential Pulse Voltammetry (DPV) on bare GCE and two modified electrodes: NFC/GCE and CS/NFC/GCE in PBS (pH 7.0) at 50 mV/s. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7(a)">
      Figure 7(a)
     </xref> displays the DPV signal for different concentrations of Trp at the bare GCE. The oxidation peak current was observed at 0.75 V. The peak current response of the electrochemical sensor presents a linear variation with the concentration of L-Tryptophan, over the range from 5 × 10<sup>−4</sup> to 10<sup>−2</sup> mM, with a sensitivity of 8.15 µA∙mM<sup>−1</sup>.</p>
    <fig id="fig7" position="float">
     <label>Figure 7</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a) (b)<p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/4200292-rId35.jpeg?20240924015310" /></p> <p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/4200292-rId36.jpeg?20240924015310" /></p>(c) (d)Figure 7. DPV detection of L-tryptophan in the concentration range from 7.5 × 10<sup>−4</sup> to 10<sup>−2</sup> mM, on bare GCE (a), on NFCs/GCE (b), on CS/NFCs/GCE (c) in 0.01 M phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0), scan rate 50 mV/s and calibration curves of L-Tryptophan (d) at bare GCE (black line), at NFCs/GCE (red line) and at CS/NFCs/GCE (blue line). Experimental conditions: 0.01 M phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0), scan rate 50 mV/s.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig7" position="float">
     <label>Figure 7</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a) (b)<p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/4200292-rId35.jpeg?20240924015310" /></p> <p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/4200292-rId36.jpeg?20240924015310" /></p>(c) (d)Figure 7. DPV detection of L-tryptophan in the concentration range from 7.5 × 10<sup>−4</sup> to 10<sup>−2</sup> mM, on bare GCE (a), on NFCs/GCE (b), on CS/NFCs/GCE (c) in 0.01 M phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0), scan rate 50 mV/s and calibration curves of L-Tryptophan (d) at bare GCE (black line), at NFCs/GCE (red line) and at CS/NFCs/GCE (blue line). Experimental conditions: 0.01 M phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0), scan rate 50 mV/s.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4200292-rId33.jpeg?20240924015310" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig7" position="float">
     <label>Figure 7</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a) (b)<p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/4200292-rId35.jpeg?20240924015310" /></p> <p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/4200292-rId36.jpeg?20240924015310" /></p>(c) (d)Figure 7. DPV detection of L-tryptophan in the concentration range from 7.5 × 10<sup>−4</sup> to 10<sup>−2</sup> mM, on bare GCE (a), on NFCs/GCE (b), on CS/NFCs/GCE (c) in 0.01 M phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0), scan rate 50 mV/s and calibration curves of L-Tryptophan (d) at bare GCE (black line), at NFCs/GCE (red line) and at CS/NFCs/GCE (blue line). Experimental conditions: 0.01 M phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0), scan rate 50 mV/s.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4200292-rId34.jpeg?20240924015310" />
    </fig>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7(b)">
      Figure 7(b)
     </xref> shows the DPV for different concentrations of Trp at the NFCs-modified GCE; The corresponding peak current at 0.64 V of L-Trp increases proportionally with the increase in concentration of L-Trp. The plot of the oxidation peak current versus concentration exhibits good linearity in the range of 7.5 × 10<sup>−4</sup> mM to 10<sup>−2</sup> mM with a sensitivity of 33.14 µA∙mM<sup>−1</sup>. A detection limit of 0.75 µM was obtained.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7(c)">
      Figure 7(c)
     </xref> shows the DPV for different concentrations of Trp at the CS/NFCs modified GCE in the range of 4 × 10<sup>−4</sup> mM to 10<sup>−2</sup> mM; it was found that the anodic peak current shifts to the negative side and appeared at 0.55 V with an improved anodic peak response. The DPV curves clearly show that CS/NFC/GCE displays a proportionally increasing current response with increasing L-Trp concentration. The corresponding sensitivity of 140.0 µM∙mM<sup>−1</sup> is three times higher than the sensitivity of the NFC/GCE and a lower detection limit of 0.2 µM was obtained.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7(d)">
      Figure 7(d)
     </xref> shows the plots of the L-Trp oxidation peak current versus L-Trp concentration on bare GCE, NFC/GCE, and CS/NFC/GCE. The excellent electrochemical sensing property was attributed to the CS/NFC film. The RSD on the measurements was 1%.</p>
    <p>Furthermore, the analytical parameters of the proposed green nanocomposite CS/NFC were compared with the other modified electrodes, and the values are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>. In comparison, our proposed sensor exhibits excellent electrocatalytic activity for the electrochemical determination of Trp: the lowest potential value was required for the Trp oxidation and the higher sensitivity was obtained.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-"></xref>Table 1. Comparison of CS/NFCs/GCE sensor with other reported electrochemical sensors for the determination of L-Tryptophan.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="40.33%">Modified Electrode<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.07%">Potential<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.60%">Limit of detection(μM)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="10.96%">Linear range(μM)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.06%">Sensitivity<p style="text-align:center"></p>(μA/mM)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.99%">References<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="40.33%">poly(L-Methionine)/3 Graph (a) (d)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.07%">0.76 vs. SCE<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.60%">0.017<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="10.96%">0.2 - 150<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.06%">23.4<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.99%">
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-32">
         [32]
        </xref><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="40.33%">MnWO4 nanoplates encapsulated RGOnanocomposite (a) (d)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.07%">0.72 vs. Ag/AgCl<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.60%">0.004<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.96%">0.001 - 120<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.06%">43.3<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.99%">
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-3">
         [3]
        </xref><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="40.33%">Poly(glycine) modified carbon nanotubepaste electrode (b) (d)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.07%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.60%">0.42<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.96%">20 - 100<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.06%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.99%">
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-33">
         [33]
        </xref><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="40.33%">Graphite electrode from waste batteries (c) (d)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.07%">0.75 V vs. SCE<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.60%">1.73<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.96%">5 - 150<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.06%">32.4<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.99%">
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-34">
         [34]
        </xref><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="40.33%">Ni-ZIF-8/N S-CNTs/CS (a) (d)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.07%">0.72<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.60%">0.69<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.96%">5 - 850<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.06%">12.2<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.99%">
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-35">
         [35]
        </xref><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="40.33%">Ta<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>-rGO (a) €<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.07%">0.7 V vs. SCE<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.60%">0.84<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.96%">1-<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.06%">-<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.99%">
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-36">
         [36]
        </xref><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="40.33%">3-neomenthylindene (b) (d)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.07%">0.79 V vs. Ag/AgCl<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.60%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.96%">8 - 80<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.06%">-<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.99%">
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-37">
         [37]
        </xref><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="40.33%">rGO-PTCA-chitosan (a) (d)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.07%">0.8 V vs. SCE<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.60%">1.2<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.96%">1000 - 10,000<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.06%">62.19<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.99%">
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-38">
         [38]
        </xref><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="40.33%">MWCNTs-CTAB (a) (d) nanocomposite-modified<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.07%">0.85 V vs. Ag/AgCl<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.60%">1.6<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.96%">4.9 - 64.1<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.06%">-<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.99%">
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-39">
         [39]
        </xref><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="40.33%">Pectin (a)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.07%">0.65 V vs. Ag/AgCl<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.60%">0.09<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.96%">0.09 - 20<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.06%">90.15<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.99%">
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-21">
         [21]
        </xref><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="40.33%">Chitosan/Nanofibrillated cellulose (a)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.07%">0.55 V vs. Ag/AgCl<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.60%">0.2<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.96%">0.75 - 100<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.06%">111.36<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.99%">This work<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>(a) GCE, (b) CPE, (c) graphite electrode, (d) DPV, (e) GC.</p>
    <p>The stability of the modified electrode was studied by investigating the oxidation current of 0.1 mM of L-Trp in pH 7.0 PBS after storage in a refrigerator at 4˚C for one month; the catalytic current response was maintained at 91.3% of its initial value after one month.</p>
    <p>The repeatability of the CS/NFCs/GCE was estimated by measuring the current response of 0.1 mM L-Trp for 4 modified electrodes. The relative standard deviation (RSD) was 2.6% (n = 4).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_7">
    <title>3.7. Interference Study</title>
    <p>To testify to the selectivity of the sensor, an interference experiment was carried out by recording the electrochemical responses of 0.1 mM Trp on the CS/NFCs/ GCE in the electrochemical cell in the presence of potential interfering substances. Several amino acids including leucine, isoleucine, proline, lysine, aspartic acid, valine, and glutamine were used to examine the interference with L-Trp; no significant change in the Trp peak current in the presence of these interfering amino acids was found.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">
      Figure 8
     </xref> shows the simultaneous detection of Trp with two kinds of important biological substances: ascorbic acid (AA) and uric acid (UA). There were no significant changes in the Trp current peak in the presence of these interfering substances. Based on these results, the CS/NFCs/GCE showed good selectivity for L-Tryptophan determination.</p>
    <fig id="fig8" position="float">
     <label>Figure 8</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 8. (a) detection of 0.2 mM of L-tryptophan on CS/NFCs/GCE (b) simultaneous detection of 0.2 mM ascorbic acid (AA), 0.1 mM uric acid (UA) and 0.2 mM tryptophan (Trp) on CS/NFC/GCE in 0.01 M phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0), scan rate 50 mV/s.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4200292-rId37.jpeg?20240924015310" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_8">
    <title>3.8. Analysis of Urine Sample</title>
    <p>A CS/NFC modified glassy carbon electrode was used to detect Trp in human urine samples. The real samples were collected from healthy volunteer patients with informed consent from the volunteers based on the Declaration of Helsinki. These samples were diluted 100 times with 0.1 phosphate buffer solution (pH7) without any treatment. The standard addition method was applied, so different concentrations of L-Trp were added to the previously diluted human urine. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">
      Figure 9
     </xref> shows the DPV of L-Trp in the concentration range from 8 × 10<sup>−3</sup> mM to 12 × 10<sup>−3</sup> mM on CS/NFC/GCE, current peaks were observed at 0.55 V.</p>
    <fig id="fig9" position="float">
     <label>Figure 9</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 9. DPV detection of L-tryptophan in human urine sample. Experimental conditions: 0.01 M phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0), scan rate 50 mV/s.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4200292-rId38.jpeg?20240924015310" />
    </fig>
    <p>The equation of the linear relationship between the current and the concentration of L-Trp, in the diluted human urine is: y = 140.0x + 1.02. The detected concentration of L-Tryptophan was 7.3 × 10<sup>−3</sup> mM (149.1 mg/L). As reported in the literature, the normal range for L-Tryptophan in human urine is 137 - 240 mg/L. The detected value is included in the normal concentration range <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.136176-40">
      [40]
     </xref>. Consequently, the obtained results demonstrated that the developed sensing NFC matrix can present a suitable applicability to biological fluids.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Conclusion</title>
   <p>A stable, sensitive, and selective electrochemical sensor based on nanofibrillated cellulose was successfully developed and applied to the detection of L-Tryptophan. The CS/NFC/GCE exhibited superior electrocatalytic activity and high sensitivity due to the large surface area and conductivity of cellulose nanofibrils. Using the chitosan/nanofibrillated cellulose composite leads to higher detection sensitivity compared to that of synthesized nanomaterials-based sensors. Furthermore, the practical feasibility of the green composite-based sensor for biological fluids was demonstrated in human urine samples. This biosensor could be used for the detection of L-Tryptophan in other biological fluids such as saliva and blood serum.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>The authors thank the CNRS for financial support through IRP NARES. Campus France is thanked for support through PHC Maghreb EMBISALIM.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fiorucci, A.R. and Cavalheiro, É.T.G. (2002) The Use of Carbon Paste Electrode in the Direct Voltammetric Determination of Tryptophan in Pharmaceutical Formulations. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 28, 909-915. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0731-7085(01)00711-7
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Liu, J., Dong, S., He, Q., Yang, S., Xie, M., Deng, P., et al. (2019) Facile Preparation of Fe
     <sub>3</sub>O
     <sub>4</sub>/C Nanocomposite and Its Application for Cost-Effective and Sensitive Detection of Tryptophan. Biomolecules, 9, Article 245. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9060245
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sundaresan, R., Mariyappan, V., Chen, S., Keerthi, M. and Ramachandran, R. (2021) Electrochemical Sensor for Detection of Tryptophan in the Milk Sample Based on MnWO4 Nanoplates Encapsulated RGO Nanocomposite. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 625, Article ID: 126889. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126889
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sakthivel, R., Mutharani, B., Chen, S., Kubendhiran, S., Chen, T., Al-Hemaid, F.M.A., et al. (2018) A Simple and Rapid Electrochemical Determination of L-Tryptophan Based on Functionalized Carbon Black/Poly-L-Histidine Nanocomposite. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 165, B422-B430. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0381810jes
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhang, L., Sun, M., Jing, T., Li, S. and Ma, H. (2022) A Facile Electrochemical Sensor Based on Green Synthesis of Cs/Ce-MOF for Detection of Tryptophan in Human Serum. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 648, Article ID: 129225. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129225
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wang, L., Yang, R., Li, J., Qu, L. and Harrington, P.D.B. (2019) A Highly Selective and Sensitive Electrochemical Sensor for Tryptophan Based on the Excellent Surface Adsorption and Electrochemical Properties of PSS Functionalized Graphene. Talanta, 196, 309-316. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.12.058
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Li, N., Liu, W., Li, W., Li, S., Chen, X., Bi, K., et al. (2010) Plasma Metabolic Profiling of Alzheimer’s Disease by Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry. Clinical Biochemistry, 43, 992-997. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2010.04.072
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Qiu, Y., Cai, G., Su, M., Chen, T., Zheng, X., Xu, Y., et al. (2009) Serum Metabolite Profiling of Human Colorectal Cancer Using GC-TOFMS and UPLC-QTOFMS. Journal of Proteome Research, 8, 4844-4850. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1021/pr9004162
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yamada, K., Miyazaki, T., Shibata, T., Hara, N. and Tsuchiya, M. (2008) Simultaneous Measurement of Tryptophan and Related Compounds by Liquid Chromatography/Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography B, 867, 57-61. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.03.010
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Alwarthan, A.A. (1995) Chemiluminescent Determination of Tryptophan in a Flow Injection System. Analytica Chimica Acta, 317, 233-237. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2670(95)00390-8
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Altria, K.D., Harkin, P. and Hindson, M.G. (1996) Quantitative Determination of Tryptophan Enantiomers by Capillary Electrophoresis. Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications, 686, 103-110. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4347(96)00037-0
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ren, J., Zhao, M., Wang, J., Cui, C. and Yang, B. (2007) Spectrophotometric Method for Determination of Tryptophan in Protein Hydrolysates. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 45, 360-366.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gautam, J., Raj, M. and Goyal, R.N. (2020) Determination of Tryptophan at Carbon Nanomaterials Modified Glassy Carbon Sensors: A Comparison. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 167, Article ID: 066504. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ab7e88
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Huang, K., Xu, C., Xie, W. and Wang, W. (2009) Electrochemical Behavior and Voltammetric Determination of Tryptophan Based on 4-Aminobenzoic Acid Polymer Film Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 74, 167-171. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.07.013
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nasimi, H., Madsen, J.S., Zedan, A.H., Malmendal, A., Osther, P.J.S. and Alatraktchi, F.A. (2023) Electrochemical Sensors for Screening of Tyrosine and Tryptophan as Biomarkers for Diseases: A Narrative Review. Microchemical Journal, 190, Article ID: 108737. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2023.108737
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Maciel, J.V., Durigon, A.M.M., Souza, M.M., Quadrado, R.F., Fajardo, A.R. and Dias, D. (2019) Polysaccharides Derived from Natural Sources Applied to the Development of Chemically Modified Electrodes for Environmental Applications: A Review. Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 22, e00062. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teac.2019.e00062
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Karthik, R., Karikalan, N. and Chen, S. (2017) Rapid Synthesis of Ethyl Cellulose Supported Platinum Nanoparticles for the Non-Enzymatic Determination of H
     <sub>2</sub>O
     <sub>2</sub>. Carbohydrate Polymers, 164, 102-108. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.077
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhan, X., Hu, G., Wagberg, T., Zhan, S., Xu, H. and Zhou, P. (2015) Electrochemical Aptasensor for Tetracycline Using a Screen-Printed Carbon Electrode Modified with an Alginate Film Containing Reduced Graphene Oxide and Magnetite (Fe
     <sub>3</sub>O
     <sub>4</sub>) Nanoparticles. Microchimica Acta, 183, 723-729. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-015-1718-y
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Palanisamy, S., Thangavelu, K., Chen, S., Velusamy, V., Chen, T. and Kannan, R.S. (2017) Preparation and Characterization of a Novel Hybrid Hydrogel Composite of Chitin Stabilized Graphite: Application for Selective and Simultaneous Electrochemical Detection of Dihydroxybenzene Isomers in Water. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 785, 40-47. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.12.019
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhou, S., Han, X. and Liu, Y. (2016) SWASV Performance toward Heavy Metal Ions Based on a High-Activity and Simple Magnetic Chitosan Sensing Nanomaterials. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 684, 1-7. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.05.152
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bourigua, S., Boussema, F., Bouaazi, D., Mzoughi, Z., Barhoumi, H., Majdoub, H., et al. (2024) Sensitive Electrochemical Detection of L-Tryptophan Using a Glassy Carbon Electrode Modified with Pectin Extracted from Arthrocnemum Indicum Leaves. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 953, Article ID: 117998. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2023.117998
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Phanthong, P., Reubroycharoen, P., Hao, X., Xu, G., Abudula, A. and Guan, G. (2018) Nanocellulose: Extraction and Application. Carbon Resources Conversion, 1, 32-43. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crcon.2018.05.004
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Besbes, I., Alila, S. and Boufi, S. (2011) Nanofibrillated Cellulose from TEMPO-Oxidized Eucalyptus Fibres: Effect of the Carboxyl Content. Carbohydrate Polymers, 84, 975-983. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.12.052
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jebali, Z., Nabili, A., Majdoub, H. and Boufi, S. (2018) Cellulose Nanofibrils (CNFs) from Ammophila Arenaria, a Natural and a Fast Growing Grass Plant. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 107, 530-536. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.09.024
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zinoubi, K., Majdoub, H., Barhoumi, H., Boufi, S. and Jaffrezic-Renault, N. (2017) Determination of Trace Heavy Metal Ions by Anodic Stripping Voltammetry Using Nanofibrillated Cellulose Modified Electrode. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 799, 70-77. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.05.039
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Annu, Sharma, S., Nitin, A. and Jain, R. (2020) Cellulose Fabricated Pencil Graphite Sensor for the Quantification of Hazardous Herbicide Atrazine. Diamond and Related Materials, 105, Article ID: 107788. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2020.107788
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Velusamy, V., Palanisamy, S., Chen, S., Balu, S., Yang, T.C.K. and Banks, C.E. (2019) Novel Electrochemical Synthesis of Cellulose Microfiber Entrapped Reduced Graphene Oxide: A Sensitive Electrochemical Assay for Detection of Fenitrothion Organophosphorus Pesticide. Talanta, 192, 471-477. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.09.055
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wang, X., Karaman, C., Zhang, Y. and Xia, C. (2023) Graphene Oxide/Cellulose Nanofibril Composite: A High-Performance Catalyst for the Fabrication of an Electrochemical Sensor for Quantification of P-Nitrophenol, a Hazardous Water Pollutant. Chemosphere, 331, Article ID: 138813. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138813
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yıldız, C., Eskiköy Bayraktepe, D. and Yazan, Z. (2020) Electrochemical Low-Level Detection of L-Tryptophan in Human Urine Samples: Use of Pencil Graphite Leads as Electrodes for a Fast and Cost-Effective Voltammetric Method. Monatshefte für Chemie—Chemical Monthly, 151, 871-879. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-020-02620-7
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhang, J., Jiang, G., Goledzinowski, M., Comeau, F.J.E., Li, K., Cumberland, T., et al. (2017) Green Solid Electrolyte with Cofunctionalized Nanocellulose/Graphene Oxide Interpenetrating Network for Electrochemical Gas Sensors. Small Methods, 1, Article ID: 1700237. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.201700237
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Laviron, E. (1979) General Expression of the Linear Potential Sweep Voltammogram in the Case of Diffusionless Electrochemical Systems. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry, 101, 19-28. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-0728(79)80075-3
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wang, Y., Ouyang, X., Ding, Y., Liu, B., Xu, D. and Liao, L. (2016) An Electrochemical Sensor for Determination of Tryptophan in the Presence of DA Based on Poly(l-Methionine)/graphene Modified Electrode. RSC Advances, 6, 10662-10669. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra24116b
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Harisha, K.V., Kumara Swamy, B.E. and Ebenso, E.E. (2018) Poly (Glycine) Modified Carbon Paste Electrode for Simultaneous Determination of Catechol and Hydroquinone: A Voltammetric Study. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 823, 730-736. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.07.021
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tasić, Ž.Z., Mihajlović, M.B.P., Radovanović, M.B., Simonović, A.T., Medić, D.V. and Antonijević, M.M. (2022) Electrochemical Determination of L-Tryptophan in Food Samples on Graphite Electrode Prepared from Waste Batteries. Scientific Reports, 12, Article No. 5469. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09472-7
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yao, W., Guo, H., Liu, H., Li, Q., Wu, N., Li, L., et al. (2020) Highly Electrochemical Performance of Ni-ZIF-8/N S-CNTs/CS Composite for Simultaneous Determination of Dopamine, Uric Acid and L-tryptophan. Microchemical Journal, 152, Article ID: 104357. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2019.104357
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhou, S., Deng, Z., Wu, Z., Xie, M., Tian, Y., Wu, Y., et al. (2019) Ta
     <sub>2</sub>O
     <sub>5</sub>/rGO Nanocomposite Modified Electrodes for Detection of Tryptophan through Electrochemical Route. Nanomaterials, 9, Article 811. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9060811
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zagitova, L.R., Maistrenko, V.N., Yarkaeva, Y.A., Zagitov, V.V., Zilberg, R.A., Kovyazin, P.V., et al. (2021) Novel Chiral Voltammetric Sensor for Tryptophan Enantiomers Based on 3-Neomenthylindene as Recognition Element. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 880, Article ID: 114939. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114939
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     You, H., Mu, Z., Zhao, M., Zhou, J., Chen, Y. and Bai, L. (2018) Voltammetric Aptasensor for Sulfadimethoxine Using a Nanohybrid Composed of Multifunctional Fullerene, Reduced Graphene Oxide and Pt@Au Nanoparticles, and Based on Direct Electron Transfer to the Active Site of Glucose Oxidase. Microchimica Acta, 186, Article 1. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-018-3127-5
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Karim-Nezhad, G., Sarkary, A., Khorablou, Z. and Seyed Dorraji, P. (2018) Electro-Chemical Analysis of Tryptophan Using a Nanostructuring Electrode with Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and Cetyltrimethylammonium Bromide Nanocomposite. Journal of Nanostructures, 8, 266-275.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.136176-ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Berg, C.P. and Rohse, W.G. (1947) The Tryptophan Content of Normal Human Urine. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 170, 725-729. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)30854-2
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>