The study was carried out in Bamendakwe found in the Bamenda I subdivision, situated Southeast of Mezam division, one of the seven divisions of the Northwest region of Cameroon. It is located within latitude 5˚51' to 5˚58' north of the equator and longitude 10˚8' to 10˚17' east of the Greenwich meridian. It falls within the humid tropical climatic zone and covers a total surface area of about 110 km² with one main village (Bamendakwe) comprising 13 quarters, namely, Abangoh, Achichum, Alahnting, Aningdoh, Banche, Nkar, Ayaba, Ntanche, Ntafebuh, Nta’afi, Moyo, Keneleri, and Abumuchi. This municipality is oriented 366 km Northwest of the Cameroon capital with an altitudinal range from about 1269 to 2606 m above sea level. The Bamenda I municipality is bounded to the north by Bamenda III subdivision, to the south by Santa, to the east by Tubah and Balikumbat, and to the west by Bamenda II subdivision [7] . It is connected to the national territory by the national road No 6. Its geographical location falls within the Guinean climate type. The climate is marked by two distinct seasons which are the dry and rainy season. The rainy season is usually from around mid-March to mid-October and sometimes extends to November. The rainfall ranges between 2000 and 2500 mm per annum and highest amounts are recorded in July and August.

The source types, sample codes, and their geographical coordinates as well as Pictures of the sampling sites are presented in Table 1 and Figure 1 below respectively:

A total of twelve (12) water samples were collected from three (03) sampling points in September 2022 (wet season samples) and February 2023 (dry season samples). Two (02) samples were collected at each sampling point in clean and labelled polyethylene containers of 500 mL capacity each. The containers and caps were thoroughly rinsed with water to be sampled before collection. Collections were done very early in the morning before sunrise and the samples packaged in a cooler containing ice in order to maintain the temperature close to 4˚C to minimize physicochemical changes [1] . The samples were finally transported to the Research Unit of Animal Physiology and Microbiology and the Research Unit of Soil Analysis and Environmental Chemistry of the University of Dschang for preservation and analyses. A global positioning system (G.P.S) Garmin Etrex Vista was used to determine the coordinates of the sampling points. The sampling points are indicated on Figure 2 .

The water and effluent samples were observed with naked eyes for gross appearance and examined for offensive odour through personal organoleptic assessment. Temperature, pH, electrical conductivity, and total dissolved solids were measured in situ with the help of a calibrated multi pH meter (APERA). Turbidity was measured using a turbidimeter (Model DRT, 100B, MF scientific, Inc). Sodium and potassium ions were determined by flame spectrometry, Calcium and Magnesium ions, by complexometric titration, and Iron, lead, zinc and aluminium by colorimetry. Chloride content was determined by the argentometric method while Nitrate and ammonium were determined by Kjeldahl’s distillation method. Phosphates were determined by UV-visible spectrophotometric analysis, Bicarbonates, by acid-base titration and sulphates by gravimetric analysis.

The multiple tubes fermentation technique or most probable number (MPN) technique was used for the presumptive determination of total coliforms and the standard count plate technique was used for the determination of specific bacteria (total faecal Coliform, Salmonella, Escherichia coli, Streptococcus spp., Staphylococcus spp., Shigella spp., Vibrio spp. and Enterobacteria) as described by [8] .

Statistical analyses were done using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0. Precisely, paired t-test was used to verify if there exist any significant difference between the mean parameters and Pearson correlation was used to verify the relations existing between parameters. The Piper’s diagram was used to determine the water types.

Organoleptic characteristics of sampled waters are summarized in Table 2 below:

RNKW1 = River Upstream; RNKW2 = Effluent; RNKW3 = River Downstream.

Upstream and downstream samples (RNKW1 and RNKW3 respectively) were clear, colourless with some tiny debris and odourless while effluent sample (RNKW2) was brownish with tiny debris and had a perceptible odour. This could be due to the infiltration of wastewater from the dumpsite into the river. Equally, the presence of debris in all sampled waters could be justified by the fact that the river is exposed to dust particles in the dry season and exposed to floods in the rainy season. Thus, the water samples do not align with WHO standards for domestic water as far as organoleptic parameters are concerned and there require treatment before use. A similar observation was made by Biosengazeh et al. [9] in open ground water sources in the Baba I village in the Northwest region of Cameroon.

The physicochemical properties of the water samples are summarized in Table 3 .

EC = Electrical conductivity.

The pH values of water samples in the wet season were significantly higher than those in the dry season (p ≤ 0.05), with the highest value of 7.6 registered for various samples. Decrease in pH could be due to the rains resulting in the dissolution of carbon dioxide to yield carbonic acid as shown by Equation (1).

${\text{H}}_2{\text{O}}_{\left(\text{l}\right)}+{\text{CO}}_{2\left(\text{g}\right)}\rightleftarrows {\text{H}}_2{\text{CO}}_{3\left(\text{aq}\right)}$(1)

Acidic pH could equally be explained by the fact that leaching washes acidic cations H⁺ and Al³⁺ from the soil into the river source [1] . However, all the pH values fell within the range of 6.5 - 8.6 prescribed by WHO [1] and 6.5 - 9 prescribed by ANOR [10] .

Turbidity values ranged from 1.8 to 8.2 NTU in the wet season and from 2.1 to 10.8 NTU in the dry season, falling within the limit prescribed by WHO (<5 NTU), except for the effluent samples (RNKW2) which had highest values in both seasons, with a maximum value of 10.8 NTU. High turbidity values in the effluent samples could be attributed to the presence of organic matter and high suspended particles content [11] . Such high values may indicate the presence of hazardous chemical and microbial contaminants. The slight increase in turbidity of samples downstream compared to upstream, though not statistically significant (p > 0.05), could be due to possible contamination by the effluent. As can be seen on Table 3 , the turbidity values were significantly higher in the dry season than in the wet season (p < 0.05).

The values of the electrical conductivity of the various samples were significantly higher in the dry season than in the wet season, (p ≤ 0.05) which could be due to the higher concentration of ions in the dry season, as the volume of water drops. These results are supported by a similar work done by Njoyim et al. [12] . The WHO standard is 1.5 mS/cm at 20˚C. Thus, the level of dissolved salts in the samples was low and hence does not present any risk of contamination.

Total dissolved solutes (TDS) ranged between 14.6 and 174 mg/L in September and between 16.6 and 74.4 mg/L in February. The lower values of TDS in February could be due to factors such as decrease in dilution, decaying organic matter (plants and animal matter) and colloids. These results are in agreement with the findings of Istifanus et al. [13] who carried out similar studies in the Bauchi State in Nigeria. The palatability of water with a TDS level less than 600 mg/L is generally considered to be good [1] .

The concentrations of Na⁺ and K⁺ significantly dropped from September to February (p < 0.05). This could be as a result of the dilution factor associated with the rains. Also, the concentrations of sodium and potassium were higher in the samples downstream (RNKW3) than upstream (RNKW1), probably due to an inflow of the ions through the effluent. However, all the values obtained were far below the WHO and ANOR limits of 200 mg/L and 20 mg/L for Na⁺ and K⁺ respectively. Low sodium is probably due to low NaCl as well as low sodium and aluminium silicates at the dumpsite given that sodium in water generally results from the leaching of geological formations containing sodium chloride as well as rock salt decomposition like sodium and aluminium silicates [14] . Low K⁺ ion concentration may be due to its low geochemical mobility. These results agree with those obtained by Temgoua [15] who analysed the chemical and bacteriological properties of drinking water from alternative sources in the Dschang Municipality, Cameroon.

Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ ions are responsible for water hardness. Generally, there was a significant increase in the concentrations of both ions in moving from the rainy to the dry season (p < 0.05). Higher concentrations in the dry season may be due to the higher temperature, which increases concentration of salts by excessive evaporation. Depletion of hardness in rainy season may be due to the dilution by rainwater. The increase in hardness can be attributed to the decrease in water volume and increase in the rate of evaporation at high temperature, high loading of organic substances, detergent, chloride, and other pollutants [16] . Similar results have been reported in the region by Nchofua et al. [17] . The concentrations of both ions were however lower than the WHO guideline values of 75 and 50 mg/L for Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ respectively. Hard water is good for drinking and cooking but not good for laundry, bathing and for use in the laboratory.

${\text{NH}}_4^{+}$ found in the water sources was surely from biological breakdown of domestic and agricultural wastes and its presence was thus an indicator of bacterial, sewage, and animal wastes contaminations [18] . However, its low concentrations, with significant differences in seasons (p < 0.05) below the permissible limit of 30 mg/L prescribed by the WHO and ANOR, showed no associated health risk. This result was in accordance with the observation of Wirmvem et al. [19] who studied the hydrochemistry of shallow groundwater and surface water in the Ndop Plain, North West Cameroon.

Cl⁻ is mainly obtained from the dissolution of salts such as table salt (NaCl) and added through industrial sewage and seawater. The lowest value of Cl⁻ (8.4 mg/L) was recorded in the sample upstream and the highest (116.22 mg/L) recorded for effluent in the month of February. The moderately high chloride concentrations in the downstream sample were possibly due to contamination from the effluent. Seasonal changes influenced the concentration of Cl⁻ in the samples (p < 0.05), as the concentrations were higher in the dry season than in the wet season. This could be due to high dilution of the chloride because of high rainfall in the wet season. According to WHO and ANOR standards, the concentration of chloride should not exceed 250 mg/L. The Cl⁻ concentration was thus within the permissible limit set by WHO. Low chloride ions in the sampled waters could be because of low NaCl in the geological formations of the study area, as it is generally derived from the decomposition of rock salts like sodium and Aluminium silicates [20] . High Cl⁻ concentrations in water damages metallic pipes and structures, as well as harm growing plants.

The concentrations of heavy metals in analyzed samples are presented in Table 4 below:

MAC: Maximum Allowable Concentrations.

The values recorded for lead ion (Pb²⁺) ranged from 0.01 mg/L to 0.04 mg/L for both seasons, with a general increase in concentration in February (possibly due to leaching), which was statistically insignificant (p > 0.05). These values were above the WHO and ANOR standard of 0.01 mg/L. The highest value was registered for the sample downstream due to possible contamination from the effluent. Exposure to such high concentrations in pregnant women, could cause miscarriages, while in men could damage the organs responsible for sperm production [21] .

The concentration of aluminium in the various samples ranged from 0.98 to 1.87 mg/L in September and 1.32 to 2.15 mg/L in February, with a general increase from September to February. All the values were above the WHO standard of 0.2 mg/L. Such levels of aluminium promote microbial growth in water systems which may lead to health complications.

The concentrations of Zinc ranged between 0.23 and 1.68 mg/L in September and between 0.56 and 3.12 mg/L in February with an increase in moving from September to February. These results were below the 3.0 mg/L guideline value prescribed by WHO, except for the effluent sample-RNKW2, which, in the month of February had a value of 3.12 mg/L. This could possibly be the reason for the greater values of the samples downstream (RNKW3) compared to those upstream (RNKW1).

For Iron (Fe), the concentrations ranged from 0.1 - 0.21 mg/L in September and 0 - 0.34 mg/L in February without any significant changes with seasons (p > 0.05). All the results were below the 0.3 mg/L guideline value, except for the effluent sample which had a concentration of 0.34 mg/L in the month of February. Concentrations of iron above 1.0 mg/L could cause ill health such as gastrointestinal irritation [22] .

Ouedraogo et al. [23] reported trace metals contamination of water resources in the community of Méguet, which was mainly due to Fe (3.78 - 11.12 mg/kg), Hg (0.03 - 0.29 mg/kg), As (0.01 - 6.31 mg/kg) and Pb (0.01 - 3.8 mg/kg) traced to effluents from mines located within that municipality. Nkobe et al. [24] evaluated four anthropogenic activity impacts on heavy metal quality of the Kumba river in the Southwest Region of Cameroon and found out anthropogenic activities greatly influenced the water quality.

The concentrations of major anionic and cationic constituents of the water samples were plotted on a Piper trilinear diagram [25] to determine the water types. The diamond-shaped field between the two triangles is used to represent the composition of water with respect to both cations and anions. The plot of physicochemical data on the diamond shaped trilinear diagram ( Figure 3 ) revealed that the analyzed water samples were calcium and magnesium bicarbonate type, thus making the water hard.

Most probable number of coliforms in 100 mL of original water are presented in Table 5 below:

Analyses revealed the presence of faecal coliforms in all samples with most probable numbers ranging between 160 and 170 MPN/100mL in September 2022 and between 43 and 180 MPN/100mL in February 2023 ( Table 5 ). With such high values, all the samples were thus classified under category D (grossly polluted) and not fit for consumption in both sampling sessions [8] . It was observed that MPN/100mL was higher downstream compared to upstream, a proof that the effluent is affecting the water quality downstream.

Specific microbes isolated in colony forming units are presented in Table 6 below:

Faecal contamination is of global concern owing to the negative health effects associated with it. The samples were analysed for specific microbes which included Enterobacteria spp., E. coli, Streptococcus spp., Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., Staphylococcus spp. and Vibrio spp. Higher colony counts of pathogenic bacteria in the sample downstream (RNKW3) suggested their recent contamination by human or animal faeces and equally possible contamination from the effluent, both scenarios being indicators of poor hygiene and sanitation conditions for the inhabitants. Similar high coliform counts have been reported in other areas in Cameroon by Temgoua [15] , Njoyim et al. [12] , Mofor et al. [20] , Biosengazeh et al. [9] and Mofor et al. [26] .