Kanfarandé is a rural commune of the urban commune of Boké in the administrative region of Boké in Guinea. It is located between longitude 10˚49'60'' North and attitude 14˚33'00'' West at an altitude of 25 m. It is located at 79 km from the Urban commune of Boké and limited to the east by the rural commune of Kolaboui, to the west by the island of Kanoff, to the north by the rural commune of Sansalé and to the south by the Atlantic Ocean. The climate is characterized by the alternation of two seasons; a rainy season which extends from May to October and a dry season which extends from November to April. The dominant winds are: The harmattan which blows of the North-East from December to February and the monsoon which blows of the South-West in the other months. According to the general population census in 2016, Kanfarandé has a population of 31,428 inhabitants. The city is characterized by a multi-ethnic population and agriculture is the dominant activity [14] . Figure 1 shows the map of the rural commnune Kanfarandé.

The Teaching and Research Laboratories in Applied Energy and Renewable Energy of the Gamal Abdel Nasser University of Conakry and the Higher Institute of Technology of Mamou served as study environment for this present work.

The software used for data processing and analysis includes:

It is a new generation professional weather station ( Figure 2 ) manufactured with advanced components and technology. This device provides precise and reliable measurement of wind speed and direction.

To assess the energy potential of a wind site, it is important to express the wind speed frequency distribution. The Wind speed distribution modeling have been oriented towards models combining power and exponential. Among the usual models used, we chose the Weibull distribution. This distribution was used for the statistical study of data measured on the ground. The probability density and cumulative frequency of this distribution are given by [15] :

$f\left(v\right)=\frac{k}{c}{\left(\frac{v}{c}\right)}^{k-1}\exp \left[-{\left(\frac{v}{c}\right)}^k\right]$(1)

where v is the wind speed, c (m/s) is the scale parameter that determinates the position of the curve, k (unit less) is a shape parameter that indicates the shape of the curve. There are several methods for determining the Weibull parameters, among which we used the standard deviation method (SD). With the average speed and the standard deviation available, the estimation of the Weibull parameters is done using the following two formulas [16] :

$k={\left(\frac{\sigma }{v}\right)}^{-1,086}$(2)

$c=\frac{\bar{v}}{\Gamma \left(1+\frac{1}{K}\right)}$(3)

where $\bar{v}$ the average speed, σ the standard deviation and Γ is the usual gamma function defined by the following relation

$\Gamma \left(x\right)=\underset{0}{\overset{+\infty }{{\displaystyle \int }}}{e}^{-t}.t^{x-1}.dt$(4)

When the frequency of calm winds recorded on a given site is greater than or equal to 15% then the hybrid Weibull distribution can be used [17] . It is written

For v > 0 $f\left(v\right)=\left(1-F{F}_o\right)\left(\frac{k}{c}\right){\left(\frac{v}{c}\right)}^{k-1}{e}^{-{\left(\frac{v}{c}\right)}^k}$(5)

For v = 0 $f\left(v\right)=F{F}_o$(6)

where F and F₀.

The cubic average speed is given by [18]

${\bar{V}}^3=c^3\text{Γ}\left(1+\frac{1}{k}\right)$(7)

And the cubic speed is given

$V^3=c^3\text{Γ}\left(1+\frac{3}{k}\right)$(8)

Wind power available

The available energy power of a wind of speed V crossing a surface unit S is given by the Relation [19] :

$\bar{P}=\frac{1}{2}\rho {\bar{V}}^3$(9)

By replacing ${\bar{V}}^3$ from (Equation (7)) into (Equation (9)) we obtain

$\bar{P}=\frac{1}{2}\rho c^3\text{Γ}\left(1+\frac{3}{k}\right)$(10)

where, ρ (kg/m³) is the wind density.

Wind energy available

The wind energy available per day with the Weibull distribution is [20] :

$E_j=0,0147c^3\text{Γ}\left(1+\frac{3}{k}\right)$(11)

This research focused on the analysis of two data which are among others: in situ data (Boké meteorological station) and data obtained by NASA aerial satellite. The data used to assess wind potential of the Kanfarandé site are collected over six years and cover the period from 2018 to 2023. They correspond to acquisitions of wind veloecity and direction at 20 m height every 3 hours (8 measurements per day).

Data processing allowed us firstly to calculate the monthly, annual and interannual average speed and then to present their evolution curve. The results of the comparison between the interannual monthly averages speed over the six-year period and the annual monthly average speed are presented in Figure 3 .

Figure 3 shows the curves follow the same trend and the maximum annual and interannual monthly average speeds are observed in July and August. This means, wind potential is greater for these two months. We also noticed the most favorable year is 2020 where the average speed is 4.08 m/s while the most unfavorable year is 2023 in which the average speed is 3.95 m/s as shown in Figure 4 .

The study of the average characteristics of wind potential on the Kanfarandé site is associated with the study of the diurnal variation of the wind average speed on the site.

The following Figure 5 shows the average speed is higher during the day than during the night. Therefore, wind potential is higher during the day than at night. This remark is observed, both for the data of each year and for the data of six years.

The seasonal wind speeds given in Figure 6 indicate us the rainy season is the windiest. We can see the most favorable year in rainy season is 2022 with an average speed of 4.59 m/s, while the most unfavorable year is 2021 where the average is 4.20 m/s. For the dry season, the most favorable year is 2021 with an average of 3.84 m/s while the most unfavorable year is 2019 with an average of 3.48 m/s.

The statistical analysis data allowed to determine the wind rose which is the graphic representation of the frequency of the wind average speed as a function of the direction in a polar reference. The wind rose is determined for each year and for all data over the 6 years. The results obtained show the dominant wind direction is the South-West as shown in Figure 7 .

The data are also fitted to the Weibull law. The theoretical average speed, Weibull parameters and theoretical power density are calculated. Figure 8 shows the evolution of monthly power density over the six-year period.

The results obtained show the calculated average speed is higher during the months of July and August, for which the power density reaches 103 W/m² and 124 W/m² respectively. This result agrees with the results presented previously on the average wind characteristicstics.

The weibull parameters and power density are summarized in Table 1 .

The power and energy available for the 6 years are presented in Table 2 .

We observe in Table 2 , the year 2022 presents the best potential with 207.61 W/m² while the low potential was observed in 2023 with 178.17 W/m².

The frequency histograms associated with the Weibull distribution curve for each year and for all the data are also determined. The results in Figure 9 show, the observed distribution follows the Weibull distribution well.

Figure 10 represents the histogram and weibull distribution of wind speed for Kanfarandé site. While Figure 11 gives the available wind powers available at kanfandé site. According to Figure 11 , we notice the available powers are very important throughout the locality, especially near the ocean, with a slight variation from 194.43 to 195.29 W/m².

In this study, we examined wind potential of the Kanfarandé site at an altitude of 20m which allowed us to get a form factor of 2.40, a scale factor of 4.5 m/s, an annual power density of 65 W/m² and a monthly potential of 103 to 124 W/m². These values are close to that found by [10] [(B. Ould Bilal, 2008)] namely 65 and 85 W/m² respectively, with a slight difference in altitude elevation of 10 and 20 m. In his study he obtained: a form factor of 2.58; a scale factor of 5m/s; an available power of 85 W/m² and a monthly potential varying from 113 to 116 W/m². However, we note the power density obtained by [10] is slightly higher than that found in this study with a difference of 10 W/m².