<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojas
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Open Journal of Animal Sciences
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2161-7597
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2161-7627
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ojas.2024.144018
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojas-135904
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Biomedical 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Life Sciences
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Cysticercus Tenuicollis in Visceral Organs of Goats and Sheep in Uganda: A Case Study in Lira Municipal Abattoir
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Joseph
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Magala
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Barnabas
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Mudde
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Patrick Abel
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Mawadri
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"> 
      <sup>3</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Williams
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Guma
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"> 
      <sup>4</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Sylvester Dickson
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Baguma
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"> 
      <sup>4</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Patrick Olango
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Okot
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"> 
      <sup>5</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Jolly
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Akullo
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"> 
      <sup>6</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aNational Agricultural Research Organisation, Kachwekano Zonal Agricultural Research and Development Institute, Kabale, Uganda
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aNational Agricultural Research Organisation, Ngetta Zonal Agricultural Research and Development Institute, Lira, Uganda
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff3">
    <addr-line>
     aCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff4">
    <addr-line>
     aNational Agricultural Research Organisation, Bulindi Zonal Agricultural Research and Development Institute, Hoima, Uganda
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff5">
    <addr-line>
     aNorwegian Refugee Council West-Nile Office, Yumbe, Uganda
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff6">
    <addr-line>
     aFaculty of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, Arapai Campus, Busitema University, Tororo, Uganda
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     12
    </day> 
    <month>
     09
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    14
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    04
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    249
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    259
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      25,
     </day>
     <month>
      March
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      9,
     </day>
     <month>
      March
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      9,
     </day>
     <month>
      September
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    Cysticercus tenuicollis is a metacestode stage of Taenia hydatigena residing in the visceral organs of small ruminants and its effects cause economic losses due to condemnation of visceral organs in slaughterhouses. This study reports on the prevalence of Cysticercus tenuicollis in small ruminants slaughtered in Lira Municipal Abattoir. A total of 70 sheep and 70 goats were sampled and examined after slaughter for the presence of Cysticercus tenuicollis in the visceral organs using standard meat inspection procedures. An abattoir data collection sheet was used to record data, which was then analysed in SPSS version 20. The study revealed 51.4% of goats and 68.6% of sheep to be infested with Cysticercus tenuicollis. Following the district of origin for the small ruminants, Otuke district had the highest prevalence of the parasite (82.6%), followed by Kole (72.4%), Alebtong (66.7%), Apac (59.4%) and Lira (31.4%). Cysticercus tenuicollis was more frequently seen in the intestines (57.8%) of sheep and goats than in any other visceral organs. The liver had a prevalence of 20.7%, the lungs 17.8%, the kidneys 3.5% and the fetal sac; (15.7%) in goats and (12.9%) in sheep. Cysticercus tenuicollis was detected in 68.8% of females and 58.8% of male small ruminants. It is recommended to routinely deworm goats and sheep by farmers most especially in districts with the highest prevalence of Cysticercus tenuicollis infestation. The sale of the condemned parts of sheep and goats and the feeding of dogs on these contaminated materials should be stopped forthwith. It is also being suggested that a national study be carried out to determine the prevalence and economic impact of Cysticercus tenuicollis in small ruminants.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Cysticercus tenuicollis
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Goats and Sheep
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Abattoir
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>The population of goats and sheep in Africa is 373 million and 165 million, respectively, representing approximately 40% and 32% of the world’s total. Within Africa, the distribution of small ruminants varies widely, with a higher concentration found in dry areas than in humid areas. Despite their higher contribution to the total world livestock population, sheep and goats produce only about 16% of the world’s meat <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. Small ruminants are important domestic animals in the tropical animal production systems in East Africa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. Uganda is endowed with 16 million goats and 4.5 million sheep <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. About 80% of rural communities in Uganda have good potential for harvesting and utilising available resources for rearing the local breeds of small ruminants for meat towards poverty alleviation in the form of providing cash income and food security to farmers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-3">
     [3]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>However, many constraints to small ruminant production remain, owing to limited access to animal health products and services. Other production challenges for small ruminants include a lack of high-quality grazing due to bush encroachment and urbanization, increasing drought episodes, ineffective disease control, and limited market access <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. Parasites and diseases generate significant financial waste as a result of direct and indirect economic losses, and it is a major public health concern <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. Among the parasitic burden in small ruminants is Cysticercus tenuicollis, this is a metacestode stage of the adult internal parasite of dogs called Taenia hydatigena. Ruminants are the intermediate hosts of Cysticercus tenuicollis while canines are the definitive hosts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. This metacestode resides inside ruminant animals as an intermediate host. During carcass inspection, they are typically observed as loosely filled cysts with transparent fluid found in the abdominal viscera attached to the cavities of the abdominal viscera and livers of infected animals. Cysticercus tenuicollis has an important economic loss due to the condemnation of visceral organs in slaughterhouses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-5">
     [5]
    </xref>. The transmission of Cysticercus tenuicollis occurs most commonly in environments characterized by poor sanitation, poor livestock husbandry practices, and a high abundance of stray dogs. Traditional husbandry practices, inadequate meat inspection and management, and poor control policies favour transmission of the parasite <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. Significant losses occur arising from organ condemnation due to hydatid and C. tenuicollis cysts in small ruminants in developing countries, where there are low standards of sanitation, unregulated home slaughter, and close contact between people and animals, especially in pastoral communities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-7">
     [7]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Although surveys on the prevalence of livestock parasite infestations have been reported in different parts of Uganda, there are no published studies on Cysticercus tenuicollis. Studies conducted in abattoir surveys to determine the prevalence of parasitic infestations in ruminants have focused on cases such as porcine cysticercosis, hydatidosis, fasciolosis, and their economic burden <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-8">
     [8]
    </xref>. This has made Cysticercus tenuicollis a neglected infestation, with its effects unquantified in Uganda. The current study aims to determine the prevalence of Cysticercosis tenuicollis in sheep and goats in northern Uganda as well as to explore the influence of district of origin, sex, age, and visceral organ infestation.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-"></xref>2.1. Study Area</title>
    <p>The study was conducted at the Lira Municipal Abattoir, Lira District, Northern Uganda. The district is located in the North Eastern part of the cattle corridor and is characterized by: a high livestock population, a weak livestock industrial sector, inadequate provision of extension services, traditional livestock husbandry practices, declining soil fertility, environmental degradation and droughts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-9">
      [9]
     </xref> which collectively contribute to livestock diseases and infestations. It covers a total area of 512 sq miles (1326 km<sup>2</sup>) with latitude and longitude of 021456˚N, 32.5400˚E respectively. Annual rainfall varies between 1200 - 1600 mm and it has an average minimum and maximum temperature of 18˚C-30˚C respectively.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-"></xref>2.2. Study Population</title>
    <p>The study population was goats and sheep slaughtered in Lira municipal abattoir, which originate from Lira and the neighboring districts such as Apac, Otuke, Kole and Alebtong. The animals were brought into the abattoir from the livestock farmers and markets located in the above-mentioned districts.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-"></xref>2.3. Study Design</title>
    <p>A Longitudinal-cross sectional study was conducted to determine the prevalence of Cysticercus tenuicollis in the Lira Municipal Abattoir. The study was conducted in the months of October 2014 to January 2015. The study involved routine meat inspection of goats and sheep slaughtered in the abattoir, as suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-10">
      [10]
     </xref>. The carcasses of these goats and sheep were thoroughly inspected for the possible presence of Cysticercus tenuicollis cysts.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_4">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-"></xref>2.4. Sampling and Sample Size Determination Methods</title>
    <p>The sample size was determined using the formula as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-11">
      [11]
     </xref>, at a 95% confidence interval. The limited number of sheep made the study longitudinal. All the sheep that were presented for slaughter were considered for the study. The number of goats inspected was equal to the number of sheep slaughtered in a day. This selection was considered during ante-mortem inspection.</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mi>
         n 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mfrac> 
        <mrow> 
         <msup> 
          <mrow> 
           <mn>
             1.96 
           </mn> 
          </mrow> 
          <mn>
            2 
          </mn> 
         </msup> 
         <mtext>
           * 
         </mtext> 
         <msub> 
          <mi>
            P 
          </mi> 
          <mrow> 
           <mi>
             exp 
           </mi> 
          </mrow> 
         </msub> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            ( 
          </mo> 
          <mrow> 
           <mn>
             1 
           </mn> 
           <mo>
             − 
           </mo> 
           <msub> 
            <mi>
              P 
            </mi> 
            <mrow> 
             <mi>
               exp 
             </mi> 
            </mrow> 
           </msub> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            ) 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
        </mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <msup> 
          <mi>
            d 
          </mi> 
          <mn>
            2 
          </mn> 
         </msup> 
        </mrow> 
       </mfrac> 
      </mrow> 
     </math></p>
    <p>where, n = required sample size,</p>
    <p>P<sub>exp</sub> = expected prevalence, 10% <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-12">
      [12]
     </xref>,</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <msup> 
        <mi>
          d 
        </mi> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
       </msup> 
      </mrow> 
     </math> = desired absolute precision. 5% (0.05<sup>2</sup>),</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mn>
         3.8416 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         ∗ 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         0.10 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         ∗ 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mn>
           0.9 
         </mn> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          / 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mn>
           0.0025 
         </mn> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </math></p>
    <p>n = 138.4 goats and sheep.</p>
    <p>Therefore, 140 small ruminant animals; 70 goats and 70 sheep were considered to be the sample size for this study.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_5">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-"></xref>2.5. Data Collection Method</title>
    <p>Data collection was done using abattoir data collection sheets. Livestock movement permits were key in revealing the district of origin for the small ruminants. Photos of infested organs were taken for record-keeping purposes and future reference. This gave a visual representation of the existing situation at the abattoir (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 1. Photo of Cysticercus tenuicollis infestation on the mesentery of the intestines in slaughtered sheep.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1401445-rId21.jpeg?20241106032822" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_6">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-"></xref>2.6. Data Analysis Method</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-"></xref>The information gathered was entered into a Microsoft Excel 2010 spreadsheet. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 22. The influence of risk factors on the infestation was compared using the Chi-square test (x<sup>2</sup>) and p-values. Chi-square (x<sup>2</sup>) statistical test was applied to determine the associations between the various potential risk factors like age and sex, and the prevalence of cysticercus cysts in the examined animals. A statistically significant association among variables was considered to exist when P-value was less than 0.05 (P &lt; 0.05).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_7">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-"></xref>2.7. Data Presentation Method</title>
    <p>Data was presented in tabular and graphical forms for simpler classification of the prevalence of the parasite and the organ distribution of cysts per predilection site. A pie chart was used to further show the prevalence of Cysticercus tenuicollis in female and male small ruminants.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-"></xref>3. Results</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-"></xref>3.1. Overall Prevalence of Cysticercus tenuicollis in Small Ruminants Slaughtered in Lira Municipal Abattoir</title>
    <p>Out of the 140 small ruminants sampled, 84 were seen infested with the Cysticercus tenuicollis parasite leading to an overall prevalence of 60%.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Variation of Prevalence of Cysticercus tenuicollis with Species of Small Ruminants</title>
    <p>Out of 70 goats and 70 sheep sampled, 36 and 48 animals were infested with the parasite revealing a prevalence of 51.4% for goats and 68.6% for sheep respectively. There is a significant relationship (P &lt; 0.05) between infestation and species of small ruminants (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-"></xref></p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-"></xref>Table 1. Prevalence of Cysticercus tenuicollis with species of small ruminants.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Species</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">No. of examined animals</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">No. of infested animals</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Prevalence (%)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">x<sup>2</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">P-value</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Goats</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">70</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">36</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">51.4</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">4.286</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">0.038</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Sheep</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">70</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">48</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">68.6</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">Total</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">140</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.09%"><p style="text-align:center">84</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.28%" colspan="3"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Variation of the Prevalence of Cysticercus tenuicollis with the Age of Small Ruminants</title>
    <p>The prevalence by age revealed 68.8% in small ruminants of 1 - 2 years, 63.5% in those of 3 years and 54.1% in those of 4 years. There was no significant relationship (P &gt; 0.05) between infestation and age of small ruminants (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-"></xref>Table 2. Prevalence of Cysticercus tenuicollis with age of small ruminants.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">Age (Years)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">No. of examined animals</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.67%"><p style="text-align:center">No. of infested animals</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.67%"><p style="text-align:center">Prevalence (%)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.67%"><p style="text-align:center">x<sup>2</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.67%"><p style="text-align:center">P-value</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">1 - 2</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">16</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.67%"><p style="text-align:center">11</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.67%"><p style="text-align:center">68.8</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="3" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.67%"><p style="text-align:center">1.569</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="3" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.67%"><p style="text-align:center">0.210</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">63</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.67%"><p style="text-align:center">40</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.67%"><p style="text-align:center">63.5</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">61</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.67%"><p style="text-align:center">33</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.67%"><p style="text-align:center">54.1</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. Variation of the Prevalence of Cysticercus tenuicollis with the Sex of Small Ruminants</title>
    <p>Out of the 84 small ruminants infested with Cysticercus tenuicollis, 34 were females and 50 were males revealing the prevalence of 61.8% and 58.8%respectively. The study revealed no significant relationship (P &gt; 0.05) between Cysticercus tenuicollis infestation and the sex of small ruminants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 2. Showing prevalence of Cysticercus tenuicollis with sex of small ruminants.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1401445-rId22.jpeg?20241106032822" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_5">
    <title>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-"></xref>3.5. Variation in Prevalence of Cysticercus tenuicollis with District of Origin of Small Ruminants</title>
    <p>The study results showed Otuke district to be with the highest prevalence of Cysticercus tenuicollis 82.6%, Kole 72.4%, Alebtong 66.7%, Apac 59.4% and 31.4% from Lira. There was a significant relationship between infestation and origin of small ruminants (P &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-"></xref></p>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-"></xref>Table 3. Prevalence of Cysticercus tenuicollis with a district of origin of small ruminants.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="18.41%"><p style="text-align:center">District of origin</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="18.42%"><p style="text-align:center">No. of examined animals</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="18.41%"><p style="text-align:center">No. of infested animals</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="18.42%"><p style="text-align:center">Prevalence (%)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="13.17%"><p style="text-align:center">x<sup>2</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="13.17%"><p style="text-align:center">P-value</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.41%"><p style="text-align:center">Lira</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.42%"><p style="text-align:center">35</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.41%"><p style="text-align:center">11</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.42%"><p style="text-align:center">31.4</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="5" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.17%"><p style="text-align:center">19.0</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="5" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.17%"><p style="text-align:center">0.001</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.41%"><p style="text-align:center">Apac</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.42%"><p style="text-align:center">32</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.41%"><p style="text-align:center">19</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.42%"><p style="text-align:center">59.4</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.41%"><p style="text-align:center">Kole</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.42%"><p style="text-align:center">29</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.41%"><p style="text-align:center">21</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.42%"><p style="text-align:center">72.4</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.41%"><p style="text-align:center">Otuke</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.42%"><p style="text-align:center">23</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.41%"><p style="text-align:center">19</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.42%"><p style="text-align:center">82.6</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.41%"><p style="text-align:center">Alebtong</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.42%"><p style="text-align:center">21</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.41%"><p style="text-align:center">14</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.42%"><p style="text-align:center">66.7</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_6">
    <title>3.6. Distribution of Cysticercus tenuicollis in the Internal Organs of the Small Ruminants</title>
    <p>Cysticercus cysts showed greater presence in the intestines (57.80%), than the Liver (20.70%), Lungs (17.85%), fetal sac (14.30%), and the Kidney (3.55%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref>). Between species, sheep showed a higher prevalence of Cysticercus tenuicollis for all organs, except for the fetal sac. This further explains the findings in section 4.2 where it was reported that sheep had a higher prevalence of 68.8% when compared to goats (51.40%).</p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 3. The distribution of Cysticercus tenuicollis in the internal organs of small ruminants.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1401445-rId23.jpeg?20241106032822" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-"></xref>4. Discussion</title>
   <p>The overall prevalence of Cysticercus tenuicollis in small ruminants was 60%. A similar prevalence (60.3%) was reported in Ethiopia <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-13">
     [13]
    </xref>. Higher prevalence 71.8% was reported in Maiduguri, North Eastern Nigeria <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-14">
     [14]
    </xref>. However, a lower prevalence of 36.3% was recorded in Southern Iran <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-15">
     [15]
    </xref>, and 15.4% in Kerman in Iran <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-16">
     [16]
    </xref>. The relatively higher prevalence of C. tenuicollis recorded in the study could be associated with the degree of pasture contamination and the way of raising and open feeding methods of small ruminants, including communal grazing, tethering which favour the interaction and transmission cycle between ruminants and dogs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-13">
     [13]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-17">
     [17]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Species wise, the study revealed a prevalence of C. tenuicollis to be 68.6% in sheep and 51.4% among goats. Higher prevalence of 71.9% in goats was reported in Maiduguri Eastern Nigeria <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-14">
     [14]
    </xref>, 55.1% in Southern Iran <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-15">
     [15]
    </xref> and 63.9% in Ethiopia <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-13">
     [13]
    </xref> Lower prevalence (18.04%) were reported in goats in Kerman abattoir in Iran <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-16">
     [16]
    </xref>; and 46.6% in Debrezeit <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-18">
     [18]
    </xref>. The prevalence of C. tenuicollis recorded in the current study could be attributed to variations in the degree of pasture contamination and extensive grazing favour the transmission cycle between ruminants and dogs. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-13">
     [13]
    </xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-17">
     [17]
    </xref> attributed the high prevalence in goats (63.9%) to the extensive rearing system which allowed the animals to pick eggs on pastures. The prevalence of C. tenuicollis in the current study (68.6%) in sheep is close to the prevalence (65.6%) reported in Turkey <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-19">
     [19]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-20">
     [20]
    </xref> and 63.9% in Ethiopia <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-13">
     [13]
    </xref>. Higher prevalence of 71.6% was reported in Eastern Nigeria <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-14">
     [14]
    </xref>. Lower prevalence of 12.8% and 12.13% were found in sheep from Iran <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-16">
     [16]
    </xref> and Turkey’s Malatya province <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-20">
     [20]
    </xref>. The lower infestation rate of the goats as opposed to sheep in this study could be attributed to their grazing characteristics. Goats browse by the eating leaves of short trees and shrubs, which are rarely soiled by dog faeces, reducing the chances of infestation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-16">
     [16]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>The current study found that younger small ruminants 1 - 2 years were slightly more infested (68.8%) than the adults of 3 years (63.5%) and 4 years (54.1%). Other studies have found a prevalence of 42.5% in small ruminants over 3 years old, 33.5% in kids and lambs in Ethiopia <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-21">
     [21]
    </xref>; 49.6% in adult goats and sheep, 38.6% in young goats and sheep <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-18">
     [18]
    </xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-20">
     [20]
    </xref> in Turkey reported adult animals to be more infested than younger ones. The high prevalence of young small ruminants observed in the current study could be attributed to the method of grazing (tethering) where the adult animals and the kids are left to graze in the same place. Also, the young small ruminants have more close contact with the shepherded dogs leading to the ingestion of the eggs of T. hydatigena. However, the lower infestation in adult small ruminants is attributed to the increased immunity resulting from the consumption of a small number of eggs.</p>
   <p>The current study revealed female small ruminants (61.80%) were more infested than males (58.80%). Cysticercus tenuicollis infestation and sex of small ruminants are in agreement with the previous findings <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-20">
     [20]
    </xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-14">
     [14]
    </xref>. The slightly higher prevalence in the current study in female small ruminants could be attributed to the greater demand for feeds needed to meet the nutrient requirement during gestation hence pre-disposing them to the infestation.</p>
   <p>The prevalence of C. tenuicollis with respect to the district of origin of small ruminants revealed an infestation rate of (82.6%) with Otuke, (72.4%) Kole, (66.7%) Alebtong, (59.4%), Apac (59.4%) and (31.4%) Lira. This trend in infestation could be attributed to management practices like communal feeding (grazing) and management systems which increase the interaction and exposure of the small ruminants to freely roaming stray dogs on grazing land and the deep-ingrained habit of feeding dogs with trimmed and condemned slaughter materials could have been an important risk factors. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-13">
     [13]
    </xref> advanced similar arguments when their study revealed a higher prevalence of C. tenuicollis in highland goats and sheep (68.1%) than those in lowland (56.6%). Their study attributed the findings to grazing or feeding and management practices in highland areas and the close association between goats and dogs in this area. The lower prevalence in both sheep and goats from the lowland was attributed to environmental conditions such as high temperature and low humidity, both of which are detrimental to the survival of T. hydatigena eggs.</p>
   <p>The internal organs revealed a higher prevalence of C tenuicollis attached to the intestines (57.80%) the liver (20.70%), lungs (17.85%), fetal sac (14.30%), and kidneys (3.55%). The obtained sequences of the cysts in this study are consistent with findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-16">
     [16]
    </xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-22">
     [22]
    </xref>. There was a greater presence of the parasite in the mesentery, which is probably better explained by its lifecycle. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-16">
     [16]
    </xref> reported that metacestodes migrate through the hepatic parenchyma to the peritoneal cavity maturing to become attached among other surfaces. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135904-20">
     [20]
    </xref> cites the fact that the mesentery covers a larger surface area in the peritoneal cavity as a possible reason for the greater presence of the parasite in this region.</p>
   <sec id="s4_1">
    <title>4.1. Study Limitations</title>
    <p>1) The study only based on routine post-mortem inspection to determine the prevalence of infestations. The use of molecular methods could reveal in-depth findings that the eyes could miss.</p>
    <p>2) The number of sheep presented in the abattoir was few on a daily basis which lengthened the study period.</p>
    <p>3) The limited number of sheep presented in the abbatoir saw a selection of sheep for the study following a census.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_2">
    <title>4.2. Avenues for Future Research</title>
    <p>1) The study recommends future studies with a bigger sample size in different districts and locations in Uganda.</p>
    <p>2) Encourage investors to establishment of abattoirs and selling points for mutton to enable and facilitate studies with sheep meat towards safety of humans, animals and environment.</p>
    <p>3) A study on the economic losses caused by infestations of organs by parasites in goats and sheep slaughtered in the abattoir should be conducted.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Conclusion</title>
   <p>The study aimed to determine the prevalence of Cysticercus tenuicollis in goats and sheep slaughtered in Lira Municipal abattoir. The study revealed a prevalence of 60% in small ruminants slaughtered in Lira Municipal Abattoir. Sheep exhibited a significantly higher infestation (68.6%) than goats (51.4%). Prevalence was not significantly affected by the age and sex of the small ruminants. The district of origin however had a significant influence on infestation. The predominant site of infestation with Cysticercus cysts was the intestines with a prevalence of (57.80%), Liver (20.70%), the fetal sac in female animals (14.30%), Lungs (17.85%), and Kidney (3.55%). Among all the small ruminants infested with the parasite, at least each possessed a cysticercus cyst on the intestines. The research also observed that condemned abattoir materials were being uncontrollably sold to dog owners. It’s being concluded that this practice in the face of a significantly high prevalence of Cysticercus tenuicollis has exacerbated infestation and contributed to the maintenance of the parasite’s life cycle between the intermediate host (small ruminants) and the final host (dogs).</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>Acknowledgement</title>
   <p>I am grateful for the technical support from Dr Okwany Patrick (RIP) and Dr Kamugisha Godfrey (RIP).</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.135904-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     FAO (2019) The Future of Livestock in Opportunities and Challenges in the Face of Uncertainty. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135904-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Armson, B., Ekiri, A.B., Alafiatayo, R. and Cook, A.J. (2020) Small Ruminant Production in Tanzania, Uganda, and Ethiopia: A Systematic Review of Constraints and Potential Solutions. Veterinary Sciences, 8, Article 5. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8010005
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135904-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ssewannyana, E., Onyait, A.O., Okwir, W., Ekoi, M., Okello, M., Masaba, J. and Ajibo, G.E. (2004) Characteristics of Rural Goat Production and Marketing in Kumi and Lira Districts, Uganda. Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 9, 289-293.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135904-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Saulawa, M.A., Magaji, A.A., Faleke, O.O., Mohammed, A.A., Kudi, A.C., Musawa, A.I., Ugboma, A.N., Akawu, B., Sidi, S., Lawal, N. and Ambursa, A.U. (2011) Prevalence of Cysticercus Tenuicollis Cysts in Sheep Slaughtered at Sokoto Abattoir, Sokoto State, Nigeria. Sokoto Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 9, 24-27. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135904-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jahed Khaniki, G.R., Kia, E.B. and Raei, M. (2012) Liver Condemnation and Economic Losses Due to Parasitic Infections in Slaughtered Animals in Iran. Journal of Parasitic Diseases, 37, 240-244. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-012-0172-6
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135904-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tadesse, T. (2019) Study on Prevalence of Small Ruminant Cysticercus tenuicollis and Its Monetary Loss at Bishoftu Elfora Export Abattoir, Oromia, Ethiopia. Journal of Dairy&amp;Veterinary Sciences, 9, Article ID: 555759. &gt;https://doi.org/10.19080/jdvs.2019.09.555759
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135904-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Singh, B.B., Sharma, R., Gill, J.P.S. and Sharma, J.K. (2013) Prevalence and Morphological Characterisation of Cysticercus tenuicollis (Taenia hydatigena Cysts) in Sheep and Goat from North India. Journal of Parasitic Diseases, 39, 80-84. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s12639-013-0284-7
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135904-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Torgerson, P.R., Williams, D.H. and Abo-Shehada, M.N. (2008) Modelling the Prevalence of Echinococcus and Taenia Species in Small Ruminants of Different Ages in Northern Jordan. Veterinary Parasitology, 79, 35-51. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135904-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Opio, L.G., Abdelfattah, E.M., Terry, J., Odongo, S. and Okello, E. (2021) Prevalence of Fascioliasis and Associated Economic Losses in Cattle Slaughtered at Lira Municipality Abattoir in Northern Uganda. Animals, 11, Article No. 681. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030681
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135904-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Magona, J.W. and Musisi, G. (2002) Influence of Age, Grazing System, Season and Agroclimatic Zone on the Prevalence and Intensity of Gastrointestinal Strongylosis in Ugandan Goats. Small Ruminant Research, 44, 187-192. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-4488(02)00031-7
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135904-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Herenda, D., Chambers, P.G., Ettriqui, A., Seneviratna, P. and da Silva, T.J.P. (2000) Manual on Meat Inspection for Developing Countries. FAO, 16-24.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135904-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nsadha, Z., Thomas, L.F., Févre, E.M., Nasinyama, G., Ojok, L. and Waiswa, C. (2014) Prevalence of Porcine Cysticercosis in the Lake Kyoga Basin, Uganda. BMC Veterinary Research, 10, Article No. 239. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-014-0239-y
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135904-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Thrusfield, M. (2005) Veterinary Epidemiology. 3rd Edition, Blackwell Science.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135904-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wondimu, A., Abera, D. and Hailu, Y. (2011) A Study on the Prevalence, Distribution and Economic Importance of Cysticercus tenuicollis in Visceral Organs of Small Ruminants Slaughtered at an Abattoir in Ethiopia. Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, 3, 67-74.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135904-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Biu, A.A. and Murtala, S. (2012) Studies on Cysticercus tenuicollis Infection in Slaughtered Sheep and Goats in Maiduguri, Nigeria. Continental Journal of Veteri-nary Sciences, 6, 14.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135904-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Oryan, A., Goorgipour, S., Moazeni, M. and Shirian, S. (2012) Abattoir Prevalence, Organ Distribution, Public Health and Economic Importance of Major Metacestodes in Sheep, GOATS and Cattle in Fars, Southern Iran. Tropical Biomedicine, 29, 349-359.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135904-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Radfar, M.H., Tajalli, S. and Jalalzadeh, M. (2005) Prevalence and Morphological Characterization of Cysticercus tenuicollis (Taenia Hydatigena Cysticerci) from Sheep and Goats in Iran. Veterinarski Arhiv, 75, 469-476.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135904-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tolosa, T., Tigre, W., Teka, G. and Dorny, P. (2009) Prevalence of Bovine Cysticercosis and Hydatidosis in Jimma Municipal Abattoir, South West Ethiopia. Onder-stepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 76, a37. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v76i3.37
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135904-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Samuel, W. and Zewde, G.G. (2010) Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Distribution of Cysticercus tenuicollis in Visceral Organs of Slaughtered Sheep and Goats in Central Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 42, 1049-1051. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-010-9537-y
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135904-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Deger, S., Bicek, K., Gul, A. and Eraslan, E. (2001) Prevalence of Cysticercus tenuicollis in Sheep, Goats and Cattle in Van Province of Turkey. Van Health Sciences Journal, 7, 95-97.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135904-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Senlik, B. (2008) Influence of Host Breed, Sex and Age on the Prevalence and Intensity of Cysticercus tenuicollis in Sheep. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 7, 548-551.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135904-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Adem, J. (2016) Lung Worm Infection of Small Ruminants in Ethiopia. Advances in Life Science and Technology, 43, 12-22.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>