<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    jpee
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Journal of Power and Energy Engineering
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2327-588X
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2327-5901
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/jpee.2024.128003
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    jpee-135276
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Engineering
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Comparative Study of Exhaust Emissions from Diesel and Syngas Powered 3.5 kW Compression Ignition Engine with and without Load
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Benson
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Kariuki
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Paul
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Njogu
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Joseph
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Kamau
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Robert
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Kinyua
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Sameer
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Bachani
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aInstitute of Energy and Environmental Technology, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture&amp;Technology, Nairobi, Kenya
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Technical University of Mombasa, Mombasa, Kenya
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     12
    </day> 
    <month>
     08
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    12
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    08
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    30
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    46
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      21,
     </day>
     <month>
      June
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      13,
     </day>
     <month>
      June
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      13,
     </day>
     <month>
      August
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    Despite diesel engines being highly efficient, with low fuel consumption and reduced carbon dioxide emissions, they emit relatively high levels of particulate matter and oxides of nitrogen (NO
    <sub>x</sub>) due to high exhaust gas temperatures. Engine emissions show the quality and completeness of combustion. This paper aims to present the results of a study comparing exhaust emissions from a diesel and syngas powered engine. Syngas was produced from co-firing coal and biomass in a gasifier then cleaned, cooled and applied as an alternative fuel in an engine operated from 0 - 100% load. Exhaust-emissions were monitored at this load conditions. The exhaust-temperature was measured using thermocouples and the emission gases were analyzed using Testo 350. The emissions were lower and decreased as the engine load increased, except for sulphur dioxide and NO
    <sub>x</sub>. The study shows that levels of carbon monoxide, were higher in a range of 46.5 - 80.2%, while carbon dioxide was 3.3 - 18% higher compared to those from diesel. Hydrocarbon emissions were 480 and 1250 ppm for diesel and syngas respectively. The study reveals that the engine operates optimally at higher loads since hydrocarbons and oxides of carbon are low due to complete combustion at higher temperatures. Exhaust gas temperature was higher in the syngas fuel and increased as the engine load increased in the range of 455.83 - 480.03˚C which influenced the formation of NO
    <sub>x</sub>. NO
    <sub>x</sub> from diesel was found to be higher, ranging from 32.5 - 40.5%, compared to those from syngas with an engine load of 75%. The study observed that relative to diesel, the emissions of sulfur dioxide at 50% engine load were lower in a range of 23.7 - 57.1%. Emissions of hydrocarbons depended on the degree of substitution of diesel and engine load. The study therefore shows that, relative to diesel, emissions decreased when syngas was used with upgraded syngas from Prosporis juliflora presenting as the best alternative followed by Hyphanae compressa, and lastly rice husk. For optimal performance of the syngas fuelled engine, the study reports that the engine should be operated at engine loads above 50% with strategies on NO
    <sub>x</sub> emissions considered.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Emissions
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Engine Load
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Temperature
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Neat-Diesel
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Syngas
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Energy is a key contributor to social and economic growth in a country and determines people’s living standards <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. The transition from non-renewable to renewable energy has remained a challenge in the modern world <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. Diesel, a non-renewable energy is extensively used in the transport sector due to its proven higher energy density compared to the same volume of gasoline. Despite studies reporting diesel engines to have various advantages such as engine power superiority, energy density, and fuel economy, limitations such as engine durability and emissions have been raised <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-3">
     [3]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. Diesel emissions have been associated with global warming as well as causing respiratory and cancerous disorders <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-5">
     [5]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a division of the World Health Organization, classified diesel exhaust, particularly particulate matter, as a carcinogens <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-4">
     [4]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-5">
     [5]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-7">
     [7]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>A possible technology to lower emissions is by converting diesel engines to run on syngas and pilot diesel (dual fuel) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-8">
     [8]
    </xref>. Syngas has a much wider ignition range than conventional hydrocarbon fuels, so it can be burned leaner, reducing CO emissions and particulate matters (soot or smoke) when compared to the burning of diesel. Several researchers found that syngas as a dual fuel reduces pollution caused by NO<sub>x</sub>, SO<sub>x</sub>, and soot emission, but an increase in CO emission is noted <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-9">
     [9]
    </xref>. CO is a colorless, odorless, and poisonous gas formed in the combustion chamber as a byproduct of combustion due to insufficient oxygen and represents lost chemical energy. When there is insufficient oxygen, poor fuel atomization or distribution across the combustion chamber, or even insufficient time for the reaction, some fuel remains unburned (unburnt hydrocarbons), leading to its production.</p>
   <p>Combustion of hydrocarbons should produce CO<sub>2</sub> and water, but because of incomplete combustion, unburnt hydrocarbon emissions are produced which are carcinogenic as well as irritant odorants. On the other hand, carbon dioxide, CO<sub>2</sub>, a combustion product is a greenhouse gas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. Parameters such as exhaust gas temperature (EGT) can be used in comparative studies of different engines operated in the same or different fuels <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-10">
     [10]
    </xref>. EGT is a meaningful parameter as it represents various performance parameters in the combustion chamber such as the formation of oxides of nitrogen <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-11">
     [11]
    </xref>. Equation (1) and Equation (2) can be used to estimate the rate of formation of NO<sub>x</sub> and UHC emissions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-12">
     [12]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-13">
     [13]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          d 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            N 
          </mi> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             o 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             x 
           </mi> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          d 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          t 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          6 
        </mn> 
        <mo>
          × 
        </mo> 
        <msup> 
         <mrow> 
          <mn>
            10 
          </mn> 
         </mrow> 
         <mrow> 
          <mn>
            16 
          </mn> 
         </mrow> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <msup> 
         <mi>
           T 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mfrac> 
           <mn>
             1 
           </mn> 
           <mn>
             2 
           </mn> 
          </mfrac> 
         </mrow> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <msup> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          exp 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mfrac> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              − 
            </mo> 
            <mn>
              69 
            </mn> 
            <mo>
              , 
            </mo> 
            <mn>
              090 
            </mn> 
           </mrow> 
           <mi>
             T 
           </mi> 
          </mfrac> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <msup> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           [ 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             O 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             2 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ] 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mfrac> 
         <mn>
           1 
         </mn> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </mfrac> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <msub> 
       <mrow></mrow> 
       <mi>
         e 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <msub> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           [ 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             N 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             2 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ] 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mi>
         e 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>(1)</p>
   <p>Where [O<sub>2</sub>]<sub>e</sub> and [N<sub>2</sub>]<sub>e</sub> denote species concentrations at equilibrium in moles per cubic centimeters and can be determined from the gas analyzer and T is the maximum absolute temperature in the combustion chamber as read from the thermocouples.</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          d 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            H 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            C 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          d 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          t 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        6.7 
      </mn> 
      <mo>
        × 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          10 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          16 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <msup> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          exp 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mfrac> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              − 
            </mo> 
            <mn>
              18 
            </mn> 
            <mo>
              , 
            </mo> 
            <mn>
              733 
            </mn> 
           </mrow> 
           <mi>
             T 
           </mi> 
          </mfrac> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <mover accent="true"> 
       <mi>
         x 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ˙ 
       </mo> 
      </mover> 
      <mi>
        H 
      </mi> 
      <mi>
        C 
      </mi> 
      <mover accent="true"> 
       <mi>
         x 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ˙ 
       </mo> 
      </mover> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         O 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <msup> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mfrac> 
           <mi>
             P 
           </mi> 
           <mrow> 
            <mi>
              R 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              T 
            </mi> 
           </mrow> 
          </mfrac> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>(2)</p>
   <p>where 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mover accent="true"> 
       <mi>
         x 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ˙ 
       </mo> 
      </mover> 
      <mi>
        H 
      </mi> 
      <mi>
        C 
      </mi> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> and 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mover accent="true"> 
       <mi>
         x 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ˙ 
       </mo> 
      </mover> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         O 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> are the mole’s fractions of HC and O<sub>2</sub> respectively also obtained from the exhaust gas analyzer and t is time in seconds.</p>
   <p>The formation of NO<sub>x</sub> depends on the combustion temperature. NO<sub>x</sub> is mainly composed of nitrogen monoxide, NO, and nitrogen dioxide, NO<sub>2</sub>, which causes ecosystem acidification <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-14">
     [14]
    </xref>. At temperatures above 1100°C, nitrogen combines with excess oxygen to form NO<sub>x</sub> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-15">
     [15]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-17">
     [17]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>NO<sub>x</sub> emissions are influenced by factors such as cylinder pressure, temperature, excess oxygen and residence time <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-18">
     [18]
    </xref>. A study by Singh &amp; Maji <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-19">
     [19]
    </xref> found that at higher CR, in syngas fueled engines, NO<sub>x</sub> increases proportionally as the load increases due to the increased heat energy released from the fuel. Boehman &amp; Corre <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-14">
     [14]
    </xref> and Tomita et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-20">
     [20]
    </xref> reported Exhaust Gas recirculation (EGR) as an effective tool to reduce NO<sub>x</sub> emission. Other strategies to reduce NO<sub>x</sub> emission include the use of catalyst reduction, steam injection, or water injection, after the injection of the pilot fuel. Refitting and modification of the engine coupled with adjustments is another strategy. In their study, Gatumu et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-21">
     [21]
    </xref> suggested some minimal modifications and adjustments, such as the injection timing (IT) to 25.2 degrees before the top dead center (which increased the duration of fuel in the cylinder) and selecting an optimal CR of 18 with the inclusion of a T-pipe connector to supply the two fuels.</p>
   <p>CO emissions decrease as the compression ratio and engine load increase due to less diesel fuel being injected as diesel is replaced with a clean burning fuel <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-8">
     [8]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-15">
     [15]
    </xref>. Studies have reported a 3% decrease in emissions when the compression ratio was adjusted from 15 to 18 since there was better combustion and a reduction in ignition lag <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-22">
     [22]
    </xref>. A study by Sayin and Canakci <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-23">
     [23]
    </xref> reported that when IT was retarded by 6<sup>0</sup> crank angle before top dead center (CA bTDC), NO<sub>x</sub> emissions decreased by 37.3% under 50% engine load conditions. Other studies reported similar results, noting that retarded IT reduced maximum pressure and temperature since there was enough fuel available for combustion after TDC thus lower emissions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-24">
     [24]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-26">
     [26]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>The present study focuses on emission analysis on a modified and retrofitted engine using upgraded syngas in comparison to neat diesel emissions.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Materials and Method</title>
   <p>The study was carried out experimentally on a modified and retrofitted direct injection and compression ignition engine. The bench scale fixed bed gasifier generated upgraded syngas from optimized blends of ratio 1:1 weight by weight for coal and selected biomass (H. compressa, rice husk and P. juliflora), coded as HC, RH, and PJ respectively. The upgraded syngas was cleaned, cooled, and used to power a 3.5 kW, modified, and retrofitted test engine at a speed of 1500 revolutions per minute. The test engine was a naturally aspirated, water cooled, direct injection compression ignition engine, Kirloskar make, Model-TV1 with geometrical parameters such as 110 mm stroke length, 80 mm bore diameter, and 661 cc displacement volume <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-27">
     [27]
    </xref>. The safety of pipes, gasifier, and engine joint connections was checked using the GS 5800 ultrasonic leak detector with room ventilation also considered by opening all windows and doors to avoid carbon monoxide poisoning. All other safety procedures were strictly followed.</p>
   <p>Fuel properties of neat diesel and upgraded syngas are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tableTables 1-2">
     Tables 1-2
    </xref>. The properties of syngas were measured in triplicate and the average was obtained. Standard deviation was also determined with an analysis of variance conducted. Statistical significance was carried out by applying Tukey’s and Scheffe’s test.</p>
   <table-wrap id="table1">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-"></xref>Table 1. Upgraded syngas composition.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="29.40%">Syngas composition<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.36%">PJ<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.10%">HC<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.24%">RH<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.90%">P. value<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="29.40%">Carbon monoxide (%)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.36%">24.75 ± 0.56<sup>a</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.10%">23.8 ± 0.01<sup>b</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.24%">20.89 ± 0.78<sup>c</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.90%">0.04<sup>S</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="29.40%">Hydrogen (%)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="21.36%">22.23 ± 0.04<sup>g</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.10%">18.7 ± 0.72<sup>h</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="19.24%">14.23 ± 0.08<sup>i</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="12.90%">0.305<sup>nS</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="29.40%">Carbon dioxide (%)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="21.36%">10.21 ± 0.32<sup>d</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.10%">9.8 ± 0.02<sup>e</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="19.24%">15.54 ± 0.44<sup>f</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="12.90%">0.04<sup>S</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="29.40%">Methane (%)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="21.36%">2.23 ± 0.07<sup>j</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.10%">2.2 ± 0.86<sup>k</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="19.24%">5.23 ± 0.06<sup>l</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="12.90%">0.00<sup> S</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="29.40%">Nitrogen and other gases<sup>*</sup> (%)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="21.36%">40.58 ± 0.12<sup>m</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.10%">45.5 ± 0.59<sup>n</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="19.24%">44.11 ±0 .18<sup>o</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="12.90%">0.00<sup>S</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="29.40%">Calorific value (MJ/m<sup>3</sup>)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="21.36%">4.97 ± 0.10<sup>p</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="17.10%">4.78 ± 0.13<sup>q</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="19.24%">4.61 ± 0.09<sup>r</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="12.90%">0.02<sup>S</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>S: significant, ns: nonsignificant, significance difference at 5% applying Tukey’s and Scheffe’s test are indicated using the same letters in a row, <sup>*</sup>means the values are obtained by differences.</p>
   <table-wrap id="table2">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-"></xref>Table 2. Properties of upgraded syngas and neat diesel (Source Mustafa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-31">
       [31]
      </xref> and Nduku <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-32">
       [32]
      </xref>).</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="65.72%">Fuel parameter<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="34.28%">Quantity value<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="65.72%">Diesel density (25˚C)<p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="34.28%">845 kg/m<sup>3</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="65.72%">Diesel flow rate<p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="34.28%">4.56 × 10<sup>−</sup><sup>7 </sup>m<sup>3</sup>/s<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="65.72%">Calorific value of diesel<p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="34.28%">42 MJ/kg<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="65.72%">Air and upgraded syngas rate to test the engine<p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="34.28%">4.43 × 10<sup>−</sup><sup>3</sup> m<sup>3</sup>/s<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="65.72%">Air and upgraded syngas temperature at engine inlet<p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="34.28%">29.0˚C<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="aleft" width="65.72%">Upgraded syngas and air density<p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="34.28%">0.95 kg/m<sup>3</sup><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>Engine exhaust gases were passed through engine calorimetry, which was coupled with thermocouples (type K) and data logger (Advantest model TR2724) for exhaust gas temperature measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-13">
     [13]
    </xref>. Syngas does not auto ignite and usually a small amount of diesel is supplied through a mechanical governor at the tail end of the compression stroke to assist and boost combustion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-28">
     [28]
    </xref>. Furthermore, the study considered the optimal CR at 18 and injection timing of 25.2 degrees before the top dead centre (bTDC), since studies have reported that increasing CR from 12 to 18 and advancing engine IT causes a decrease in EGT at an optimal speed of 1500 rpm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-9">
     [9]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-21">
     [21]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-29">
     [29]
    </xref>. These studies attributed this decrease to an increased period of fuel in the combustion chamber and uniform mixing of fuels, which allows complete combustion to occur.</p>
   <p>Testo 350 emission analyzer probe was inserted into the exhaust sampling port of the calorimetry for data collection and analysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-30">
     [30]
    </xref>. The built-in software in Testo 350 and the exhaust sensors with the specification and accuracies shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
     Table 3
    </xref> made it possible to collect and send the data to a computer for storage and further analysis. The engine was loaded according to the equipment manual with data collected at an interval of two minutes according to the ISO 8178 test cycle for engine load at 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 (0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100%). Purging was performed after every load to recalibrate the exhaust gases sensors. The engine emissions concentration was measured and recorded. The experimental setup is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figFigures 1-2">
     Figures 1-2
    </xref>. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
     Figure 3
    </xref> shows the experimental methodology presented as a flow chart.</p>
   <table-wrap id="table3">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-"></xref>Table 3. Testo 350 gas analyser specifications (Source Testo, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-30">
       [30]
      </xref>).</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="31.55%">Gas sensor<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.23%">Type of sensor<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.94%">Composition range<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="32.27%">Percentage accuracies<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="31.55%">O<sub>2 </sub>(%)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.23%">infrared<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.94%">Up to 21%<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="32.27%">±2<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="31.55%">Carbon monoxide (ppm)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="19.23%">infrared<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.94%">0 - 5000<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="32.27%">±10 for less than 400 ppm and ±5 for greater than 400 ppm<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="31.55%">Carbon dioxide (ppm)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="19.23%">infrared<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.94%">0 - 2000<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="32.27%">±0.3<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="31.55%">Unburnt hydrocarbon (%)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="19.23%">infrared<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.94%">0 - 21%<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="32.27%">±10<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="31.55%">Oxides of nitrogen (ppm)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="19.23%">electrochemical<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.94%">0 - 5000<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="32.27%">±5<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="31.55%">Thermocouple type K (˚C)<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="19.23%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.94%">Up to 1000<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="32.27%">±3<p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <fig id="fig1" position="float">
    <label>Figure 1</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 1. Experimental setup.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771129-rId20.jpeg?20240905094755" />
   </fig>
   <fig id="fig2" position="float">
    <label>Figure 2</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 2. Set-up of emission and exhaust gases data collection.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771129-rId21.jpeg?20240905094755" />
   </fig>
   <fig id="fig3" position="float">
    <label>Figure 3</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 3. Experimental methodology flow chart.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771129-rId22.jpeg?20240905094755" />
   </fig>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results and Discussion</title>
   <p>The experimental data is discussed based on exhaust gas temperature and emission analysis.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Exhaust Gas Temperature (EGT) Variations with Engine Load</title>
   <p>The current study reports a maximum exhaust gas temperature (EGT) of 476.96˚C, 455.83˚C, 480.03˚C<sup>,</sup> and 475.26˚C for P. juliflora, neat diesel, rice husk, and H. compressa, respectively, when the engine was operated at 100% engine load. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
     Figure 4
    </xref> presents the variation of the EGT with the engine load.</p>
   <p>From <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
     Figure 4
    </xref>, EGT steadily increases as the engine load rises for both neat diesel and the syngas-diesel fuel mode. The observed trend is due to the increased fuel requirement (both syngas and pilot diesel) to produce the additional power needed to manage the extra load, which leads to higher exhaust gas temperatures (EGT). Additionally, the rise in EGT is due to the sufficient time available for combustion between diesel and syngas, resulting from advanced injection timing, which ensures complete combustion.</p>
   <fig id="fig4" position="float">
    <label>Figure 4</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 4. Variation of exhaust gases temperature with engine load.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771129-rId23.jpeg?20240905094757" />
   </fig>
   <p>The EGT for P. juliflora is the highest, with neat diesel being the lowest. The syngas-diesel fuel mode had a higher EGT due to lower calorific values in syngas, resulting in extended combustion during exhaust stroke. The present study agrees with other researchers.</p>
   <p>Murthy et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-33">
     [33]
    </xref> conducted a study on a syngas powered engine and found that at higher loads, the exhaust temperature rises with an increase in the flow rate of the LPG. They attributed this to the higher LPG flow rate, which, when fully combusted, gave higher exhaust gas temperatures. Furthermore, they noted that when the injection timing was advanced, a higher cylinder temperature was recorded, which consequently increased exhaust gas temperatures and NO<sub>x</sub> levels. Similarly, a research reported a 42% increase in EGT when the engine was operated on syngas than when diesel was used at CR of 18 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-21">
     [21]
    </xref>. They attributed this rise to the additional energy provided by both syngas and pilot diesel fuel.</p>
   <p>Furthermore, they suggested that the presence of slow-burning syngas might have led to some portion of unburned mixture leaving the combustion chamber to the exhaust system, where it combusts, resulting in higher EGT. Shrivastava et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-34">
     [34]
    </xref> similarly reported that when diesel was operated at full load it had an EGT of 330˚C and the dual fuel mode had a higher EGT than diesel. They attributed these results to the extra energy available in the syngas-fueled engine. Lal &amp; Mohapatra <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-9">
     [9]
    </xref> reported an EGT of 330˚C for diesel mode and 380˚C for dual fuel under full load conditions. To reduce EGT in combustion engine, a study reported that the optimal approach was to increase the density of the fuel mixture (i.e. more mass entering the combustion chamber for the same volume) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-24">
     [24]
    </xref>. Kamal et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-26">
     [26]
    </xref> conducted experiments with a supercharged compression ignition engine operating on syngas fuel. Their study recorded higher exhaust gas temperature values for the supercharged syngas-pilot diesel fuel setup, which they associated with improved and increased air-fuel density.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Composition and Levels of Combustion Emissions</title>
   <p>The variations in emission with engine load for diesel and upgraded syngas fuel samples are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figFigures 5-9">
     Figures 5-9
    </xref>.</p>
   <fig id="fig5" position="float">
    <label>Figure 5</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 5. Variation of carbon monoxide with engine loads.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771129-rId24.jpeg?20240905094757" />
   </fig>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>6. Carbon Monoxide Variation with Engine Load</title>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
     Figure 5
    </xref> shows that CO emission decreases as the engine load increases, with the highest reported CO concentration being 375 ppm in neat diesel and 450 ppm in upgraded syngas under no load conditions. At CR of 18 ND had a low percentage of CO, followed by blends of RH, HC, and finally PJ. CO emissions were found to be 46.5% to 80.2% higher in the upgraded syngas-fueled mode than in the neat diesel mode at 50% engine load. As the load increases from zero to 100%, the emissions reduce due to more fuel required, thus a rich air-fuel mixture enters the engine cylinder to maintain the speed and torque requirement. Because of the rich air-fuel mixture, the combustion is complete, and fewer carbon monoxide emissions are released. The results also indicate that carbon monoxide emissions are higher in the upgraded syngas fuel mode compared to a neat diesel-fueled engine. This was attributed to the lower oxygen content in the air-syngas mixture, which causes incomplete combustion.</p>
   <p>Shrivastava et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-34">
     [34]
    </xref> observed a similar trend, reporting a maximum CO concentration of 10 and 250 ppm in diesel and syngas fuel, respectively. Ramadhas et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-35">
     [35]
    </xref> noted maximum CO concentrations of 700 and 1300 ppm in diesel and syngas fuel respectively. For a CR of 18 and an engine load of 80%, Sombatwong et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-36">
     [36]
    </xref> found that the maximum carbon monoxide emissions was 500 ppm in syngas fuel and 100 ppm in diesel fuel. Pradhan et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-37">
     [37]
    </xref> in their review on internal combustion engine (ICE) emissions, observed that various researchers had indicated higher carbon monoxide emissions in syngas-fueled engines both at low and moderate loads. They attributed the higher levels of CO in syngas fuel mode to the presence of CO in syngas fuel, which could have been left out during combustion.</p>
   <p>However, they noted that these emissions decreased with increasing engine load, which they attributed to improved fuel conversion efficiency. Various studies attributed the higher emission of carbon monoxide in dual fuel engines to incomplete combustion in the cylinders due to insufficient air, leading to oxygen deficiency <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-23">
     [23]
    </xref>. Another study reported Carbon monoxide emissions were 300 ppm in diesel fuel and 1025 ppm when the engine was operated on syngas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-9">
     [9]
    </xref>.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s7">
   <title>7. Variation of Nitrogen Oxides with Engine Load</title>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
     Figure 6
    </xref> presents the variation of nitrogen oxide in ppm with the engine load as a percentage.</p>
   <fig id="fig6" position="float">
    <label>Figure 6</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 6. Variation of nitrogen oxides (ppm) with engine charge (%).</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771129-rId25.jpeg?20240905094758" />
   </fig>
   <p>Under no load conditions, an insignificant difference in NO<sub>x</sub> emission was observed while the engine was operated on neat diesel and upgraded syngas fuel. As the load increases, NO<sub>x</sub> emission increases in neat diesel at a range of 32.5 to 40.5% higher than upgraded syngas at a 75% engine load. The maximum concentration of NO<sub>x</sub> at full load was found to be 338.17 ppm for neat diesel (ND), 196.77 ppm, 189.71 ppm and 198.38 ppm for RH, HC and PJ, respectively. For 75% engine load, the maximum concentration of NO<sub>x</sub> was found to be 289.14 ppm for ND, 172 ppm, 183.07 ppm and 195.24 ppm for RH, HC and PJ respectively. The lower values of NO<sub>x</sub> emission obtained in upgraded syngas were due to less intense premixed combustion, which causes low flame propagation in the fuel-air mixture because of excess upgraded syngas and lower levels of oxygen (air displaced by upgraded syngas) in the cylinder, leading to lower temperatures in the combustion chamber. At a higher compression ratio, the rise in NO<sub>x</sub> emissions observed when the engine load was increased is due to more fuel injected, as well as to the higher cylinder temperatures and pressures, which promoted the formation of NO<sub>x</sub> species. A previous study highlighted that higher cylinder temperatures, adequate oxygen levels, and sufficient reaction time, favored the formation of NO<sub>x</sub> emissions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-38">
     [38]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Shrivastava et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-34">
     [34]
    </xref> reported comparable findings, reporting peak values of oxide of nitrogen emissions of 180 ppm in syngas fuel and 325 ppm in diesel engines at 75% engine load. A study reported a higher emissions level of NO<sub>x</sub> to be 904 ppm for the syngas-fueled engine when operated at 80% load condition <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-39">
     [39]
    </xref>. They associated this with a higher temperature in the cylinder caused by higher fuel injected at higher engine loads. A study by Yaliwal et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-40">
     [40]
    </xref> reported maximum NO<sub>x</sub> emissions of 110 ppm in a syngas-fueled engine under an engine load of 80%, while Lal &amp; Mohapatra <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-9">
     [9]
    </xref> reported a maximum concentration of 13 to 80 ppm in syngas fuel mode and 393 ppm in diesel mode. To reduce oxides of nitrogen, EGR can be applied in the engine. Typically, this process involves redirecting small portions of exhaust gases back into the intake manifold, where they blend with the incoming air. This action decreases the peak combustion temperatures and pressures, subsequently lowering NO<sub>x</sub> emissions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-33">
     [33]
    </xref>. The reintroduced exhaust gas displaces a portion of the standard intake charge, which moderates and cools the combustion process, ultimately diminishing NO<sub>x</sub> formation. However, reintroducing exhaust gases into the engine combustion chamber may have adverse effects on engine performance and durability due to oil and exhaust gases contaminations and degradation.</p>
   <p>Studies have reported that EGR of 15% effectively reduces NO<sub>x</sub> emission without much adverse effects on the performance (around 2.17% reduction in break thermal efficiency) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-3">
     [3]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-33">
     [33]
    </xref>. According to a study by Murthy et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-33">
     [33]
    </xref> they noted a decrease in brake thermal efficiency, which was associated with combustion degradation, stemming from lower combustion temperatures and changes in the air-fuel ratio, which resulted to reduced oxygen concentration.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s8">
   <title>8. Variation of Unburned Hydrocarbons at Various Engine Loads</title>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">
     Figure 7
    </xref> presents the variation of unburnt hydrocarbons (UHC) in ppm with varying engine load (%).</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">
     Figure 7
    </xref> clearly shows that UHC emissions are lower for neat diesel and higher for upgraded syngas, as the upgraded syngas displaces the inducted air. The UHC decreases as the engine load increases since the temperature and pressure increases as the engine load increases, and thus better combustion is attained. Shrivastava et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-34">
     [34]
    </xref> reported similar trends. The present study noted that UHC emissions are 1250 ppm in upgraded syngas fuel and 480 ppm in diesel. At a CR of 18 and under 80% load conditions, Shrivastava et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-34">
     [34]
    </xref> found the highest concentration of unburnt hydrocarbons (UHC) to be 15 ppm in diesel and 20 ppm in syngas fuel. Dhole et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-41">
     [41]
    </xref> reported UHC emissions of 2400 ppm in syngas fuel, while Banapurmath &amp; Tewari <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-42">
     [42]
    </xref> noted UHC emissions of 46 ppm in syngas fuel.</p>
   <fig id="fig7" position="float">
    <label>Figure 7</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 7. Variation of UHC in ppm with engine load (%).</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771129-rId26.jpeg?20240905094758" />
   </fig>
   <p>Studies have reported that the concentration of UHC in exhaust gases decreases as the engine load increases with dual fuel reporting lower values than diesel <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-19">
     [19]
    </xref>. A similar study by Gatumu et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-21">
     [21]
    </xref>, reported that in neat diesel at CR 18, the UHC emission decreased by 78%, when the engine load increased from zero to 100% engine load. These trends were attributed to the lack of uniform temperature distribution and homogeneity of the air fuel mixture in the cylinder (some local spots in the combustion chamber were too lean for proper combustion and the other spots were too rich) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-21">
     [21]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-23">
     [23]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-28">
     [28]
    </xref>.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s9">
   <title>9. Variation of Carbon Dioxide Emission with Engine Load</title>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">
     Figure 8
    </xref> shows that CO<sub>2</sub> emissions increase as the engine load increases, in a range of 3.3% to 18% higher than neat diesel. Singh &amp; Maji <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-19">
     [19]
    </xref> and Ahmed et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-43">
     [43]
    </xref> reported similar trends in diesel and syngas-driven engines. This behaviour was attributed to the composition of the upgraded syngas which contains some CO<sub>2</sub>. Furthermore, at high compression ratio, as the load increases, the pressure of the cylinder and the temperature also increase, leading to better fuel combustion, and thus an increase in carbon dioxide emissions. The findings of the current study align closely with those reported in the existing literature. For instance, at CR of 18, Singh et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-17">
     [17]
    </xref> observed a maximum carbon dioxide emission of 7.76% in syngas-pilot diesel and 3.63% in diesel mode, while Sahoo et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-44">
     [44]
    </xref> noted a maximum carbon dioxide emission of 6.2% in dual fuel mode and 8.0% in diesel mode. Additionally, Lal &amp; Mohapatra <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-9">
     [9]
    </xref> indicated that CO<sub>2 </sub>emissions in syngas mode relative to diesel were 6.0% to 33.72% higher at 80% engine load.</p>
   <fig id="fig8" position="float">
    <label>Figure 8</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 8. Variation of carbon dioxide emission with engine load.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771129-rId27.jpeg?20240905094759" />
   </fig>
  </sec><sec id="s10">
   <title>10. Variation of Sulfur Oxides for Various Engine Loads</title>
   <p>The variation in sulpur oxides (SO<sub>x</sub>) emission under different engine load conditions in diesel mode and in upgraded syngas mode is presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">
     Figure 9
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>From <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">
     Figure 9
    </xref> it is evident that SO<sub>x</sub> emission increases as the engine load increases. This was attributed to the fact that as the load increases, the engine requires additional fuel to sustain the additional load. The emissions from SO<sub>x</sub> reported in the present study under full load conditions were 7.30 ppm, 3.22, 3.40, and 3.90 for ND and blends of RH, HC and PJ respectively. Furthermore, at 50% engine load the SO<sub>x</sub> emissions level in syngas fueled engine were lower relative to neat diesel in a range of 23.7 - 57.1%. For an engine load of 80% and an optimal CR of 18, Saleh <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-45">
     [45]
    </xref> reported the highest SO<sub>x</sub> emissions at 25 ppm, while Tan et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-46">
     [46]
    </xref> noted a maximum SO<sub>x</sub> emission concentration of 4.6 ppm. Lal &amp; Mohapatra <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135276-9">
     [9]
    </xref> reported SO<sub>x</sub> emissions in dual fuel at CR 18 to be 54.54% lower than neat diesel at 80% engine load (3.2 kW). For full load conditions, they also reported SO<sub>x</sub> emission of 6.8 ppm for neat diesel and 4.1 ppm for syngas dual fuel mode.</p>
   <fig id="fig9" position="float">
    <label>Figure 9</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 9. Variation of SO<sub>2 </sub>with engine load.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1771129-rId28.jpeg?20240905094759" />
   </fig>
  </sec><sec id="s11">
   <title>11. Conclusion</title>
   <p>The upgraded syngas when used as an alternative transport fuel relative to neat diesel produces lower acidic emissions (oxides of sulfur and nitrogen) and thus lower environmental pollution. The study shows that unburnt hydrocarbon and oxides of carbon are higher at low engine loads and decrease as the load increases since complete combustion occurs. In fact, CO emissions were observed to be 46.5% to 80.2% higher in upgraded syngas than in neat diesel at 50% engine load. The present study reports emission levels of 1250 ppm in diesel and 480 ppm in upgraded syngas. The lower values of oxide of carbon and unburnt hydrocarbon as the engine load increased was a result of an increase in temperature which was noted at a range of 455.83˚C to 480.03˚C at full load conditions. The resulting increase in exhaust temperature as the engine load increased also caused NO<sub>x</sub> emission to increase in a range of 32.5 to 40.5% lower than neat diesel for upgraded syngas at 75% engine load. To reduce EGT and NO<sub>x</sub>, exhaust gas recirculation can be applied in combination with the injection of water into the engine chambers. CO<sub>2</sub> emissions also increase as the load increases, as expected, in a range of 3.3 to 18% higher than neat diesel implying that combustion was complete. For SO<sub>x</sub> emission, at 50% engine load, the study reveals that emission levels were lower than neat diesel in a range of 23.7 - 57.1%. Therefore, the study presents upgraded syngas from PJ, HC, and RH as the best alternative fuel compared to neat diesel when the engine is operated above 50% engine load and has an optimal speed of 1500 rpm. The scope of the research study was limited to emissions analysis on compression ignition engines fueled by the novel upgraded syngas. However, research on spark ignition engines fueled by upgraded syngas can be conducted in the future to characterize emissions and engine performance.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s12">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>Authors acknowledge Technical University of Mombasa for funding the study and the Ministry of Energy, Kenya, which assisted with the acquisition of samples.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gounkaou, Y.W., Daho, T., Diane, A., Vaitilingom, G., Piriou, B., Valette, J., et al. (2021) Experimental Study on Performance and Combustion Analysis of a Diesel Engine Fueled with Diesel and Jatropha Oil Blended with Heptane. Energy and Power Engineering, 13, 1-16. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.2021.131001 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lungu, J., Siwale, L. and Kashinga, R.J. (2024) Performance, Combustion and Emission Characteristics of Oxygenated Diesel in DI Engines: A Critical Review. Journal of Power and Energy Engineering, 12, 16-49. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/jpee.2024.126002 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Aldajah, S., Ajayi, O.O., Fenske, G.R. and Goldblatt, I.L. (2007) Effect of Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) Contamination of Diesel Engine Oil on Wear. Wear, 263, 93-98. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2006.12.055 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Plee, S.L. and Ahmad, T. (1983). Relative Roles of Premixed and Diffusion Burning in Diesel Combustion. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4271/831733 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Attfield, M.D., Schleiff, P.L., Lubin, J.H., Blair, A., Stewart, P.A., Vermeulen, R., et al. (2012) The Diesel Exhaust in Miners Study: A Cohort Mortality Study with Emphasis on Lung Cancer. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 104, 869-883. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djs035 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tan, K.T., Lee, K.T. and Mohamed, A.R. (2011) Potential of Waste Palm Cooking Oil for Catalyst-Free Biodiesel Production. Energy, 36, 2085-2088. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.05.003 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sassano, M., Collatuzzo, G., Teglia, F. and Boffetta, P. (2024) Occupational Exposure to Diesel Exhausts and Liver and Pancreatic Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. European Journal of Epidemiology, 39, 241-255. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-024-01099-4 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Murthy, K., Madhwesh, N. and ShrinivasaRao, B.R. (2012) Influence of Injection Timing on the Performance of Dual Fuel Compression Ignition Engine with Exhaust Gas Recirculation. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 1, 37-42.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lal, S. and Mohapatra, S.K. (2017) The Effect of Compression Ratio on the Performance and Emission Characteristics of a Dual Fuel Diesel Engine Using Biomass Derived Producer Gas. Applied Thermal Engineering, 119, 63-72. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.03.038 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lungu, J., Siwale, L., Kashinga, R.J., Chama, S. and Bereczky, A. (2021) Correlation of Performance, Exhaust Gas Temperature and Speed of a Spark Ignition Engine Using Kiva4. Journal of Power and Energy Engineering, 9, 53-78. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/jpee.2021.98004 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kamela, W. (2016) Evaluation of the Influence of Powering a Self-Ignition Engine with Fuel-Water Emulsion on the Parameters of Its Operation and the Concentration of Toxic Substances in Exhaust Gases. Zeszyty Naukowe Instytutu Pojazdów, Instytut Pojazdów Politechniki Warszawskiej, 108, 87-97.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ren, H., Ferguson, K., Kirkpatrick, G., Vinning, T., Chow, V. and Ma, S. (2016) Altered Crossover Distribution and Frequency in Spermatocytes of Infertile Men with Azoospermia. PLOS ONE, 11, e0156817.&gt;https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156817 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Heywood, J.B. (2018) Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals. McGraw-Hill Education.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Boehman, A.L. and Corre, O.L. (2008) Combustion of Syngas in Internal Combustion Engines. Combustion Science and Technology, 180, 1193-1206. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/00102200801963417 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Whitty, K.J., Zhang, H.R. and Eddings, E.G. (2008) Emissions from Syngas Combustion. Combustion Science and Technology, 180, 1117-1136. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/00102200801963326 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mathanmohan, M. and Vivekanandan, S. (2017) Performance Characterization of CI Engine Using Producer Gasondual-Fuel Mode. Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 11, 311–321.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Singh, R.N., Singh, S.P. and Pathak, B.S. (2007) Investigations on Operation of CI Engine Using Producer Gas and Rice Bran Oil in Mixed Fuel Mode. Renewable Energy, 32, 1565-1580. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2006.06.013 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Makarevičienė, V., Lebedevas, S., Rapalis, P., Gumbyte, M., Skorupskaite, V. and Žaglinskis, J. (2014) Performance and Emission Characteristics of Diesel Fuel Containing Microalgae Oil Methyl Esters. Fuel, 120, 233-239. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.11.049 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Singh, R. and Maji, S. (2012) Performance and Exhaust Gas Emissions Analysis of Direct Injection CNG-Diesel Dual Fuel Engine. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 4, 833-846.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tomita, E., Kawahara, N. and Roy, M.M. (2009) Hydrogen Combustion and Exhaust Emissions in a Supercharged Gas Engine Ignited with Micro Pilot Diesel Fuel.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gatumu, J.N. (2021) Evaluation of Combustion, Performance and Emission of a Direct Injection Compression Ignition (DICI) Engine Running on a Diesel-Syngas Blend. &gt;http://ir.jkuat.ac.ke/handle/123456789/5641 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hariram, V. and Vagesh Shangar, R. (2015) Influence of Compression Ratio on Combustion and Performance Characteristics of Direct Injection Compression Ignition Engine. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 54, 807-814. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2015.06.007 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sayin, C. and Canakci, M. (2009) Effects of Injection Timing on the Engine Performance and Exhaust Emissions of a Dual-Fuel Diesel Engine. Energy Conversion and Management, 50, 203-213. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2008.06.007 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hassan, S., Zainal, Z.A. and Miskam, M.A. (2011) Effects of Advanced Injection Timing on Performance and Emission of a Supercharged Dual-Fuel Diesel Engine Fueled by Producer Gas from Downdraft Gasifier. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 70, 220-224. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nunes, L.J.R., De Oliveira Matias, J.C. and Da Silva Catalão, J.P. (2018) Introduction. In: Nunes, L.J.R., et al., Eds., Torrefaction of Biomass for Energy Applications, Elsevier, 1-43. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-809462-4.00001-8 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kamal, B., Mahgoub, M., Hassan, S. and Sulaiman, S.A. (2015) Effect of Varying Engine Parameters and Syngas Composition on the Combustion Characteristics, Performance and Emission of Syngas Diesel Dual Fuel Engine A Review. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 10, 7712-7718.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mulay S.S. (2014) User Manual for IC Engine Soft. &gt;https://www.apexinnovations.co.in/ic240.html 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mahgoub, B.K.M., Sulaiman, S.A., Karim, Z.A.A. and Hagos, F.Y. (2015) Experimental Study on the Effect of Varying Syngas Composition on the Emissions of Dual Fuel CI Engine Operating at Various Engine Speeds. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 100, Article 012006. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/100/1/012006 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nwafor, O.M.I. (2002) Knock Characteristics of Dual-Fuel Combustion in Diesel Engines Using Natural Gas as Primary Fuel. Sadhana, 27, 375-382. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02703658 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Testo (2022) Testo 350-Analysis Box for Exhaust Gas Analysis Systems. &gt;https://www.testo.com/en-VN/testo-350/p/0632-3510 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mustafa, A., Calay, R.K. and Mustafa, M.Y. (2017) A Techno-Economic Study of a Biomass Gasification Plant for the Production of Transport Biofuel for Small Communities. Energy Procedia, 112, 529-536. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1111 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nduku Nzove, S. (2021) Development and Evaluation of Performance of a Bench Scale Gasier for Sub-Bituminous Coal. &gt;http://ir.jkuat.ac.ke/handle/123456789/5491 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Murthy, K., Mahesha, G.T., Rao, B.R.S. and Samaga, B.S. (2010) Application of EGR for NOx Control in LPG-Diesel Dual Fuel CI Engine. International Journal of Advances in Thermal Sciences and Engineering, 1, 37-43.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Shrivastava, V., Jha, A.K., Wamankar, A.K. and Murugan, S. (2013) Performance and Emission Studies of a CI Engine Coupled with Gasifier Running in Dual Fuel Mode. Procedia Engineering, 51, 600-608. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.085 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ramadhas, A.S., Jayaraj, S. and Muraleedharan, C. (2008) Dual Fuel Mode Operation in Diesel Engines Using Renewable Fuels: Rubber Seed Oil and Coir-Pith Producer Gas. Renewable Energy, 33, 2077-2083. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2007.11.013 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sombatwong, P., Thaiyasuit, P. and Pianthong, K. (2013) Effect of Pilot Fuel Quantity on the Performance and Emission of a Dual Producer Gas-Diesel Engine. Energy Procedia, 34, 218-227. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.750 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pradhan, A., Baredar Kumar, P. and Anil (2015) Syngas as an Alternative Fuel Used in Internal Combustion Engines: A Review. Journal of Pure and Applied Science Technology, 5, 51-56. &gt;https://nlss.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/JPAST-Jul-15-Paper-7-p-51-66.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Liu, Y., Xu, B., Jia, J., Wu, J., Shang, W. and Ma, Z. (2015). Effect of Injection Timing on Performance and Emissions of Di-Diesel Engine Fueled with Isopropanol. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Mechatronics, Phuket, 20-21 December 2015, 133-137. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2991/iceem-15.2015.33 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dhole, A.E., Yarasu, R.B., Lata, D.B. and Priyam, A. (2014) Effect on Performance and Emissions of a Dual Fuel Diesel Engine Using Hydrogen and Producer Gas as Secondary Fuels. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39, 8087-8097. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.03.085 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yaliwal, V.S., Banapurmath, N.R., Gireesh, N.M., Hosmath, R.S., Donateo, T. and Tewari, P.G. (2016) Effect of Nozzle and Combustion Chamber Geometry on the Performance of a Diesel Engine Operated on Dual Fuel Mode Using Renewable Fuels. Renewable Energy, 93, 483-501. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.020 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref41">
    <label>41</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dhole, A.E., Yarasu, R.B. and Lata, D.B. (2016) Investigations on the Combustion Duration and Ignition Delay Period of a Dual Fuel Diesel Engine with Hydrogen and Producer Gas as Secondary Fuels. Applied Thermal Engineering, 107, 524-532. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.06.151 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref42">
    <label>42</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Banapurmath, N.R. and Tewari, P.G. (2009) Comparative Performance Studies of a 4-Stroke CI Engine Operated on Dual Fuel Mode with Producer Gas and Honge Oil and Its Methyl Ester (HOME) with and without Carburetor. Renewable Energy, 34, 1009-1015. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.08.005 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref43">
    <label>43</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ahmed, S.A., Zhou, S. And Zhu, Y. (2018) Performance and Emission Characteristics Analysis of Dual Fuel Compression Ignition Engine Using Natural Gas and Diesel. International Journal of Thermodynamics, 21, 16-25. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.316300 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref44">
    <label>44</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sahoo, B.B., Sahoo, N. and Saha, U.K. (2009) Effect of Engine Parameters and Type of Gaseous Fuel on the Performance of Dual-Fuel Gas Diesel Engines—A Critical Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 1151-1184. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.08.003 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref45">
    <label>45</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Saleh, H. (2008) Effect of Variation in LPG Composition on Emissions and Performance in a Dual Fuel Diesel Engine. Fuel, 87, 3031-3039. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2008.04.007 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135276-ref46">
    <label>46</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tan, P., Hu, Z. and Lou, D. (2009) Regulated and Unregulated Emissions from a Light-Duty Diesel Engine with Different Sulfur Content Fuels. Fuel, 88, 1086-1091. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2008.11.031
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>