<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    gep
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2327-4336
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2327-4344
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/gep.2024.128006
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    gep-135251
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Earth 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Environmental Sciences
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Assessment of Water Quality in High-Pressure Peruvian Anthropic Sectors of Lake Titicaca Using a Calibrated Index 
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Stive
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Flores-Gómez
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Adilson Ben Da
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Costa
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Eduardo A.
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Lobo
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="affnull">
    <addr-line>
     aGraduate Program in Environmental Technology, University of Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC), Santa Cruz do Sul, Brazil
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     01
    </day> 
    <month>
     08
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    12
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    08
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    97
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    114
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      19,
     </day>
     <month>
      July
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      12,
     </day>
     <month>
      July
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      12,
     </day>
     <month>
      August
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    The world’s lakes are in the process of degradation, with loss of water quality as a result of anthropic influences. This research aimed to evaluate water quality in high-pressure Peruvian anthropic sectors of Lake Titicaca using a calibrated index. The study considered ten important bays with influence from urban sectors. In each bay, surface waters were monitored for six years, considering physical, chemical and microbiological parameters. Water quality was assessed using the NSF Water Quality Index (NSF-WQI) and the one calibrated for Lake Titicaca (WQI
    <sub>T</sub>). Comparing the efficiency of these two indices, the WQI
    <sub>T</sub> showed a variation from moderately polluted bays to bad quality bays, such as Desaguadero and Yunguyo. These two bays were classified as hypereutrophic, therefore, the uses attributable to this condition are only irrigation and energy production. Applying the NSF-WQI, the results were not able to identify this significative difference, as all bays were classified as moderate quality waters. This result indicates that the WQI
    <sub>T</sub> calibration was adequate, as it allows inferring and estimating the water quality of Lake Titicaca with greater precision. According to Peru’s water quality standard for category 4, established for the conservation of the country’s lakes, the parameters that exceeded the standard values were PO
    <sub>4</sub>-P (0.035 mg∙L
    <sup>−1</sup>) and BOD
    <sub>5</sub> (5 mg∙L
    <sup>−1</sup>) in all bays, and TC (1000 MPN mL
    <sup>−1</sup>) in Yunguyo bay. These high values indicate eutrophication processes, one of the main problems in the study area. The WQI
    <sub>T</sub> calibrated for Lake Titicaca can be used as an efficient tool to assess water quality in high Andean lentic waterbodies in South America.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Andean Lakes
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Water Quality Assessment
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Eutrophication
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Water Quality Index (WQI
     <sub>T</sub>)
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Freshwater, which represents 3% of the planet’s water (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-30">
     Gleick, 1993
    </xref>), is an indispensable resource for humanity and the subsistence of an enormous biodiversity of flora and fauna on all continents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-54">
     Reid et al., 2019
    </xref>). Despite their importance, today, freshwaters are subject to environmental pressures from a set of anthropic factors along their shores (industrial, agricultural, water supply, recreation, etc.), which can deteriorate water quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-35">
     Huang &amp; Zhou, 2021
    </xref>) and trigger eutrophication (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-4">
     Ali &amp; Khairy, 2016
    </xref>), highlighting that associated with cases of eutrophication, the proliferation of algal blooms cause diseases in human health and compromise ecosystem services such as the reduction in food of aquatic origin, local tourism and availability of water for human consumption, among others (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-39">
     Lee et al., 2015
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-36">
     Huisman et al., 2018
    </xref>). According to results of studies in aquatic ecology, phosphorus is an essential element for all forms of life (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-14">
     Bunting et al., 2007
    </xref>); in high concentrations, together with nitrogen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-68">
     Yao et al., 2018
    </xref>), it triggers the phenomenon of eutrophication (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-64">
     Vincon-Leite &amp; Casenave, 2019
    </xref>), a condition of high production of algae and cyanobacteria that limit the availability of oxygen and cause mortality in aquatic fauna, highlighting that its scientific importance favored the study of the proliferation of harmful algal blooms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-46">
     Paerl &amp; Huisman, 2008
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-15">
     Burford et al., 2020
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>The Water Quality Index (WQI) is a fundamental tool for assessing water quality, applied globally to surface waters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-63">
     Uddin et al., 2021
    </xref>). The development of WQI models begins with the one developed in the 1960s by R. Horton, based on the 10 physical, chemical and biological parameters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-34">
     Horton, 1965
    </xref>). Years later, Brown, with the support of the National Sanitation Foundation, developed the NSF-WQI model, together with a group of 142 experts on the current topic (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-1">
     Abbasi &amp; Abbasi, 2012
    </xref>). Currently, there are a considerable number of indices have been developed for marine and continental environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-63">
     Uddin et al., 2021
    </xref>), and given the need for tools to evaluate waterbodies with particular characteristics, new models continue to be implemented (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-17">
     Chidiac et al., 2023
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>The present research focuses on Lake Titicaca, a transboundary waterbody between Peru and Bolivia in South America, known for being the highest navigable lake in the world (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-20">
     Chura-Cruz et al., 2013
    </xref>), but also because it is the center of attention of researchers dedicated to the environmental problems that have been considered, including studies on eutrophication (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-33">
     Heredia et al., 2022
    </xref>), water quality assessment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-26">
     Farfán et al., 2015
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-23">
     Delgado et al., 2022
    </xref>), remote sensing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-8">
     Baltodano et al., 2022
    </xref>), antibiotic pollution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-6">
     Archundia et al., 2017
    </xref>), heavy metals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-18">
     Chui et al., 2021
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-51">
     Quiroga-Flores et al., 2021
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-11">
     Biamont-Rojas et al., 2023
    </xref>), algal blooms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-24">
     Duquesne et al., 2021
    </xref>) and microplastics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-40">
     Loayza et al., 2022
    </xref>), among others. Given the lack of tools to assess the evolution of the water condition in Lake Titicaca (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-43">
     Mancilla, 2016
    </xref>), the objectives of this research were first to calibrate a water quality index for Lake Titicaca (WQI<sub>T</sub>) based on physical, chemical, and microbiological parameters; second, assess the water quality and trophic state of the highly anthropic sector of Lake Titicaca.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Methodology</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Study Area</title>
    <p>Lake Titicaca, a representative waterbody of the tropical Andes in South America, is located at an altitude of 3809 m.a.s.l., and is shared by Peru and Bolivia. It has two main sectors that are interconnected by the Strait of Tiquina, the first called Major Lake which has an area of 7131 km<sup>2</sup>, an average depth of 100 m, and a maximum depth of 285 m. On the other hand, the second sector is called Minor Lake which has an area of 1428 km<sup>2</sup>, average depth of 10 m and a maximum depth of 40 m (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-22">
      Dejoux &amp; Iltis, 1992
     </xref>). Since 1971, Titicaca has been considered a Ramsar site due to its high richness in flora and fauna (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-21">
      Costantini et al., 2004
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>To understand the spatiotemporal water quality evolution for Lake Titicaca, in this study 10 sampling stations were defined in the peripheral zone to monitoring water parameters, based on the bays of Desaguadero (De), Yunguyo (Yu), Pomata (Po), Juli (Ju), Pilcuyo (Pil), Chucuito-Barco (Chu), Capachica (Ca), Pusi (Pu), Vilquechico (Vilq) and Moho (Mo); main urban centers closed to Lake Titicaca in the Peruvian sector (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>). Of the locations mentioned, the most worrying is Bay of Puno (15˚50'34'' LS, 69˚59'43'' LW) which is one of the sectors most affected by urban wastewater pollution from the city (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-26">
      Farfán et al., 2015
     </xref>), and heavy metals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-11">
      Biamont-Rojas et al., 2023
     </xref>) that alter water quality, fisheries and biodiversity.</p>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 1. Location of sampling sites in Lake Titicaca, Peruvian sector.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2173021-rId11.jpeg?20240815093748" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Data Collection</title>
    <p>The information analyzed in this article was obtained from the Lake Titicaca Special Project and corresponds to the annual period 2015-2020. The database matrix used corresponds to the average values of the dry and rainy seasons of each year. Surface water of each sampling station was analyzed to determine temperature (T), dissolved oxygen (DO), hydrogen potential (pH), and total dissolved solids (TDS) with use of Multiparameter HORIBA model U-50; turbidity (TU) was recorded using a turbidity meter HANNA model 2100Q; phosphate phosphorus (PO<sub>4</sub>-P) and ammoniacal nitrogen (NH<sub>3</sub>-N) were analyzed in spectrophotometer HACH DR/4000; biochemical oxygen demand (BOD<sub>5</sub>) and thermotolerant coliforms (TC) determination was carried out following methodologies validated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-5">
      APHA (1995)
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Water Quality Index Calibration</title>
    <p>The WQI<sub>T</sub> was calibrated based on physical, chemical, and microbiological parameters (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>), based on the original model proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-12">
      Brown et al. (1970)
     </xref> for the NSF-WQI, as well as the different valid and extensively explained indices by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-63">
      Uddin et al. (2021)
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-"></xref>Table 1. Weight score of NSF-WQI parameters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-12">
        Brown et al., 1970
       </xref>).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Parameter</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Weight mean</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">DO, mg∙L<sup>−1</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.17</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">FC, MPN/100mL<sup>−1</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.16</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">pH</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.11</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">BOD<sub>5</sub>, mg∙L<sup>−1</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.11</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">T, ˚C</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.10</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">NO<sub>3</sub>, mg∙L<sup>−1</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.10</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">PO<sub>4</sub>, mg∙L<sup>−1</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.10</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">TU, NTU</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.08</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">TS, mg∙L<sup>−1</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.07</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-"></xref>The calibration methodology used corresponds to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-45">
      Moretto et al. (2012)
     </xref>. The IQAData software proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-48">
      Posselt et al. (2015)
     </xref>, and the NSF-WQI and WQI<sub>T</sub> indices were used to calculate water quality indices by sampling stations and annual periods. The WQI<sub>T</sub> values were described using the original categories proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-12">
      Brown et al. (1970)
     </xref> which consider five classes of water quality: very bad, bad, moderate, good, and excellent (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>), and according to the colors assigned to each class (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-17">
      Chidiac et al., 2023
     </xref>).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-"></xref>Table 2. Colors and definitions used in the classification of pollution by the NSF-WQI (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-17">
        Chidiac et al., 2023
       </xref>).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Colors</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">NSF-WQI Score</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Definition</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Red</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">0 - 25</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Very bad</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Orange</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">26 - 50</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Bad</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Yellow</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">51 - 70</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Moderate</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Green</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">71 - 90</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Good</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Blue</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">91 - 100</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Excellent</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_4">
    <title>2.4. Data Analysis</title>
    <p>The records of the physical, chemical, and microbiological parameters were evaluated with the calibrated WQI<sub>T</sub> index and Peru’s water quality standards (Supreme Decree No. 004-2017-MINAM), considering category 4 (Conservation of the aquatic environment). Furthermore, the correspondence between the NSF-WQI water quality categories and the trophic state categories proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-16">
      Carlson (1977)
     </xref> is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref>, following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-25">
      El-Serehy et al. (2018)
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-"></xref>Table 3. Correspondence between NSF-WQI water quality categories and the Trophic State Index (TSI) categories, following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-25">
        El-Serehy et al. (2018)
       </xref>.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Water quality</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">NSF-WQI</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">TSI</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Rank</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Very bad</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">0 - 25</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Hypereutrophic</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt;80</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Bad</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">26 - 50</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Eutrophic</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">60 - 80</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Moderate</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">51 - 70</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Mesoeutrophic</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">50 - 60</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Good</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">71 - 90</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Mesotrophic</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">40 - 50</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Excellent</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">91 - 100</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Oligotrophic</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.39%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt;40</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Regarding phosphate, the classification for the main eutrophication categories adopted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-10">
      Barreto et al. (2013)
     </xref> was used, which was developed for lake ecosystems (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref>). The different degrees of eutrophication linked to the water uses were adopted following the classification proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-62">
      Thornton &amp; Rast (1994)
     </xref>, as presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
      Table 5
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table4">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
       Table 4
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-"></xref>Table 4. Values of the total phosphate levels for the main categories of eutrophication. Modified from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-10">
        Barreto et al. (2013)
       </xref>.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Eutrophication categories</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Phosphate concentration (PO<sub>4</sub>-P mg∙L<sup>−1</sup>)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Ultraoligotrophic</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">≤0.006</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Oligotrophic</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.007 - 0.026</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Mesotrophic</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.027 - 0.052</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Eutrophic</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.053 - 0.211</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Hypereutrophic</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.00%"><p style="text-align:center">&gt;0.211</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <table-wrap id="table5">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
       Table 5
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-"></xref>Table 5. Water uses and trophic state in a waterbody (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-62">
        Thornton &amp; Rast, 1994
       </xref>).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="29.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Use/Trophic state</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center">Oligotrophic</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.80%"><p style="text-align:center">Mesotrophic</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.79%"><p style="text-align:center">Mesoeutrophic</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center">Eutrophic</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Hypereutrophic</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="29.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Drinking water supply</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center">Desirable</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.80%"><p style="text-align:center">Tolerable</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.79%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.49%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Process water supply</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.80%"><p style="text-align:center">Desirable</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.79%"><p style="text-align:center">Tolerable</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.49%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Cooling water supply</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.80%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.79%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center">Tolerable</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.49%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Primary contact recreation</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.80%"><p style="text-align:center">Desirable</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.79%"><p style="text-align:center">Tolerable</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.49%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Secondary contact recreation</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.80%"><p style="text-align:center">Desirable</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.79%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center">Tolerable</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.49%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Landscaping</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.80%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.79%"><p style="text-align:center">Tolerable</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.49%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Fish farming (sensitive species)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.80%"><p style="text-align:center">Desirable</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.79%"><p style="text-align:center">Tolerable</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.49%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Fish farming (tolerant species)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.80%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.79%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center">Tolerable</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.49%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Irrigation</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.80%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.79%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Tolerable</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Energy production</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.80%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.79%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.32%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Tolerable</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Descriptive statistics were used to determine the mean and standard deviation of each parameter. Likewise, for comparative purposes, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used, after proving the normality of the data and the homogeneity of variances (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-69">
      Zar, 1984
     </xref>). Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) test was used to compare means between bays. Principal Components Analysis (PCA), a powerful statistical analysis, was performed with the aim of calibrating the water quality index, following the guidelines of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-29">
      Gauch (1982)
     </xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-45">
      Moretto et al. (2012)
     </xref>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-7">
      Bajaña et al. (2022)
     </xref>. For statistical analyses, the PAST (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-32">
      Hammer et al., 2001
     </xref>) and R (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-61">
      The R Development Core Team, 2013
     </xref>) software were used.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Statistical Characteristics of Water Quality Parameters</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-"></xref>The main results of water quality parameters for the 10 bays of Lake Titicaca (Peruvian sector), are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
      Table 6
     </xref>. According to the results obtained, Capachica bay was characterized by waters with a lower average temperature (12.4˚C ± 0.6˚C) in contrast to the other bays. The average DO ranged from 6.6 ± 0.8 to 7.6 ± 1.3 mg∙L<sup>−1</sup> in the Pilcuyo bay and Vilquechico bay, respectively. The average number of TC was higher than 400 MPN ml∙L<sup>−1</sup> in all bays, being higher in Yunguyo bay (1301.8 ± 502 MPN ml∙L<sup>−1</sup>). The maximum BOD<sub>5</sub> was observed in Yunguyo bay (9.6 ± 3.4 mg∙L<sup>−1</sup>) and the lowest in Moho Bay (5.5 ± 1.7 mg∙L<sup>−1</sup>). PO<sub>4</sub>-P was greater than 0.05 mg∙L<sup>−1</sup> in all bays, with the highest concentration in Yunguyo (0.46 ± 0.4 mg∙L<sup>−1</sup>). NO<sub>3</sub>-N was low and was above 0.5 mg∙L<sup>−1</sup> in all bays, with Capachica having the highest value (0.93 ± 0.6 mg∙L<sup>−1</sup>). The pH ranged from 8.0 to 8.9. TDS ranged from 865 ± 142 to 1397 ± 1034 mg∙L<sup>−1</sup> in Yunguyo bay and Pusi bay, respectively. Finally, TU ranged from 0.9 ± 0.4 to 9.7 ± 9.7 NTU in Moho Bay and Yunguyo bay, respectively.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table6">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
       Table 6
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-"></xref>Table 6. Average values (±standard deviation) of water quality parameters (n = 6) for bays of Lake Titicaca, annual period 2015-2020.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="11.54%"><p style="text-align:center">Bay</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="88.46%" colspan="9"><p style="text-align:center">Water quality parameter</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="8.47%"><p style="text-align:center">T</p><p style="text-align:center">(˚C)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="7.81%"><p style="text-align:center">DO</p><p style="text-align:center">(mg∙L<sup>−1</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="16.27%"><p style="text-align:center">TC</p><p style="text-align:center">(MPN 100 ml∙L<sup>−1</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">BOD<sub>5</sub></p><p style="text-align:center">(mg∙L<sup>−1</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">PO<sub>4</sub>-P</p><p style="text-align:center">(mg∙L<sup>−1</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">NO<sub>3</sub>-N</p><p style="text-align:center">(mg∙L<sup>−1</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">pH</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="11.83%"><p style="text-align:center">TDS</p><p style="text-align:center">(mg∙L<sup>−1</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="8.57%"><p style="text-align:center">TU</p><p style="text-align:center">(NTU)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.54%"><p style="text-align:center">Vilquechico</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.47%"><p style="text-align:center">12.8 ± 0.2</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="7.81%"><p style="text-align:center">7.6 ± 1.3</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.27%"><p style="text-align:center">407.6 ± 162</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">5.2 ± 1.7</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">0.21 ± 0.1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">0.77 ± 0.5</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">8.0 ± 0.8</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="11.83%"><p style="text-align:center">986.6 ± 93</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.57%"><p style="text-align:center">1.0 ± 0.7</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.54%"><p style="text-align:center">Pusi</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.47%"><p style="text-align:center">12.7 ± 0.6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.81%"><p style="text-align:center">7.2 ± 1.2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.27%"><p style="text-align:center">589.4 ± 282</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">6.4 ± 3.4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">0.39 ± 0.6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">0.79 ± 0.5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">8.7 ± 0.4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.83%"><p style="text-align:center">1397.1 ± 1034</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%"><p style="text-align:center">3.5 ± 2.4</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.54%"><p style="text-align:center">Moho</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.47%"><p style="text-align:center">12.6 ± 0.4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.81%"><p style="text-align:center">7.0 ± 1.1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.27%"><p style="text-align:center">473.7 ± 172</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">5.5 ± 1.7</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">0.14 ± 0.1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">0.67 ± 0.4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">8.4 ± 0.5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.83%"><p style="text-align:center">998.1 ± 87</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%"><p style="text-align:center">0.9 ± 0.4</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.54%"><p style="text-align:center">Capachica</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.47%"><p style="text-align:center">12.4 ± 0.6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.81%"><p style="text-align:center">7.5 ± 1.3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.27%"><p style="text-align:center">567.0 ± 194</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">5.8 ± 2.1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">0.15 ± 0.1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">0.93 ± 0.6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">8.9 ± 0.5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.83%"><p style="text-align:center">959.5 ± 104</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%"><p style="text-align:center">1.0 ± 0.2</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.54%"><p style="text-align:center">Chucuito</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.47%"><p style="text-align:center">13.0 ± 0.9</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.81%"><p style="text-align:center">7.2 ± 0.7</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.27%"><p style="text-align:center">636.6 ± 261</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">6.8 ± 1.1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">0.27 ± 0.2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">0.83 ± 0.6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">8.6 ± 0.4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.83%"><p style="text-align:center">991.0 ± 79</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%"><p style="text-align:center">2.0 ± 1.1</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.54%"><p style="text-align:center">Pilcuyo</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.47%"><p style="text-align:center">13.2 ± 0.3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.81%"><p style="text-align:center">6.6 ± 0.8</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.27%"><p style="text-align:center">709.7 ± 181</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">7.7 ± 3.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">0.27 ± 0.4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">0.70 ± 0.6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">8.6 ± 0.5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.83%"><p style="text-align:center">940.9 ± 137</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%"><p style="text-align:center">3.2 ± 2.5</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.54%"><p style="text-align:center">Juli</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.47%"><p style="text-align:center">13.0 ± 0.2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.81%"><p style="text-align:center">7.2 ± 0.9</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.27%"><p style="text-align:center">607.2 ± 146</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">6.6 ± 1.2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">0.14 ± 0.1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">0.62 ± 0.5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">8.7 ± 0.6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.83%"><p style="text-align:center">991.0 ± 89</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%"><p style="text-align:center">1.2 ± 0.9</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.54%"><p style="text-align:center">Yunguyo</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.47%"><p style="text-align:center">13.3 ± 0.3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.81%"><p style="text-align:center">7.0 ± 0.4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.27%"><p style="text-align:center">1301.8 ± 502</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">9.6 ± 3.4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">0.46 ± 0.4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">0.89 ± 0.5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">8.8 ± 0.8</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.83%"><p style="text-align:center">865.1 ± 142</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%"><p style="text-align:center">9.7 ± 9.5</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.54%"><p style="text-align:center">Pomata</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.47%"><p style="text-align:center">13.0 ± 0.2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.81%"><p style="text-align:center">7.0 ± 0.7</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.27%"><p style="text-align:center">730.4 ± 263</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">5.8 ± 2.6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">0.09 ± 0.1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">0.85 ± 0.6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">8.6 ± 0.5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.83%"><p style="text-align:center">996.6 ± 88</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%"><p style="text-align:center">1.2 ± 0.6</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.54%"><p style="text-align:center">Desaguadero</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.47%"><p style="text-align:center">11.5 ± 0.8</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="7.81%"><p style="text-align:center">7.3 ± 0.7</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="16.27%"><p style="text-align:center">901.9 ± 343</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">7.4 ± 2.9</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">0.31 ± 0.4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.98%"><p style="text-align:center">0.79 ± 0.4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.58%"><p style="text-align:center">8.9 ± 0.6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="11.83%"><p style="text-align:center">1234.0 ± 113</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.57%"><p style="text-align:center">3.2 ± 2.2</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Significant differences were determined between the bays for the parameters T, TC and TU (p ≤ 0.05), highlighting Yunguyo bay as the one with the highest values in the three mentioned parameters (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 2. Average (±standard deviation) of water parameters, where (a) is temperature, (b) is TC, (c) is TU, in 10 bays of Lake Titicaca. Different letters indicate a statistically significant difference between the bays (p ≤ 0.05).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2173021-rId12.jpeg?20240815093749" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Multivariate Analysis and Water Quality Index Calibration</title>
    <p>The PCA results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">
      Table 7
     </xref>, with the first three main components concentrating 62.1% of the total variance, derived from the eigenvalues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-45">
      Moretto et al., 2012
     </xref>).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table7">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">
       Table 7
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-"></xref>Table 7. PCA Eigenvalues.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Component</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Eigenvalue</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">% Total variance</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">% Cumulated</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Component 1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">2.663</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">29.6</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">29.6</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Component 2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">1.572</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">17.5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">47.1</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Component 3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">1.358</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">15.1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">62.1</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Component 4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">1.199</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">13.3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">75.5</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Component 5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.689</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">7.7</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">83.1</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Component 6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.610</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">6.8</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">89.9</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Component 7</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.451</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">5.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">94.9</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Component 8</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.259</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">2.9</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">97.8</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Component 9</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">0.198</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">2.2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">100.0</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">
      Table 8
     </xref> displays the eigenvectors that were used to interpret the primary components. Despite positive or negative associations with weight signals, the most significant factors are those with the greatest weight. The eigenvector of the principal components, which includes the microbiological, chemical, and physical characteristics determined at 10 sampling sites, is displayed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">
      Table 7
     </xref>. PC1 positively correlated with TC and BOD<sub>5</sub> (r = 0.78), PO<sub>4</sub>-P (r = 0.76) and TU (r = 0.74), reflecting indicators of eutrophication. In relation to PC2, NO<sub>3</sub>-N (r = 0.60) and TDS (r = −0.68) showed the highest correlation.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table8">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">
       Table 8
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-"></xref>Table 8. Eigenvectors are used to interpret the principal components. The most important variables are those with the highest weight, whether positive or negative values.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.26%"><p style="text-align:center">Principal component</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">T</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">PH</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">DO</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">TU</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">NO<sub>3</sub>-N</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">PO<sub>4</sub>-P</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">TC</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">BOD<sub>5</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">TDS</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.26%"><p style="text-align:center">Component 1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">0.12</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.20</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.38</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">0.74</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.12</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.76</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">0.78</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.78</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.32</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.26%"><p style="text-align:center">Component 2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">0.20</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.01</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.34</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">0.27</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.60</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.49</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">0.45</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.28</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.68</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.26%"><p style="text-align:center">Component 3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.16</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.81</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.62</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">0.34</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.26</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.06</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">0.14</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.03</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.27</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.26%"><p style="text-align:center">Component 4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.81</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.22</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.18</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.11</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.53</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.05</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">0.19</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.05</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.36</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.26%"><p style="text-align:center">Component 5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">0.50</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.02</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.14</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">0.04</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.40</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.15</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">0.04</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.32</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.37</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.26%"><p style="text-align:center">Component 6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">0.08</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.46</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.55</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.08</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.28</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.07</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">0.02</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.07</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.01</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.26%"><p style="text-align:center">Component 7</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">0.13</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.14</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.01</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.44</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.05</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.11</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">0.08</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.39</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.20</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.26%"><p style="text-align:center">Component 8</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.02</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.12</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.11</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.10</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.13</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.37</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.15</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.08</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.21</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.26%"><p style="text-align:center">Component 9</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">0.00</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.05</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.03</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">0.18</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.09</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.09</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.85%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.31</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.20</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.10</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>The WQI<sub>T</sub> was calibrated using the eigenvalues of each component and each parameter (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">
      Table 8
     </xref>), and the results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">
      Table 9
     </xref>. To acquire the new weights for the chosen parameters, a mathematical transformation of the coefficient values must be carried out after the sum (S) of the parameter weights (wi) is equal to 1. This can be done by dividing the value of each coefficient by the sum of the coefficients.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table9">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">
       Table 9
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-"></xref>Table 9. Eigenvectors transformation to calibrate WQI<sub>T</sub>.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.88%"><p style="text-align:center">Parameters</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Eigenvector</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.87%">
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-12">
         Brown et al., 1970
        </xref><p style="text-align:center">Original weight (wi) ()</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.01%"><p style="text-align:center">Calibrated weight (wi) (WQI<sub>T</sub>)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.88%"><p style="text-align:center">T, ˚C</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.24%"><p style="text-align:center">0.20</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.10</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.01%"><p style="text-align:center">0.04</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.88%"><p style="text-align:center">pH</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.24%"><p style="text-align:center">0.81</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.11</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.01%"><p style="text-align:center">0.15</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.88%"><p style="text-align:center">DO, mg∙L<sup>−1</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.24%"><p style="text-align:center">0.62</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.17</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.01%"><p style="text-align:center">0.11</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.88%"><p style="text-align:center">TU, NTU</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.24%"><p style="text-align:center">0.34</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.08</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.01%"><p style="text-align:center">0.06</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.88%"><p style="text-align:center">NO<sub>3</sub>, mg∙L<sup>−1</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.24%"><p style="text-align:center">0.60</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.10</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.01%"><p style="text-align:center">0.11</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.88%"><p style="text-align:center">PO<sub>4</sub>, mg∙L<sup>−1</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.24%"><p style="text-align:center">0.76</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.10</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.01%"><p style="text-align:center">0.14</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.88%"><p style="text-align:center">TC, MPN/100mL<sup>−1</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.24%"><p style="text-align:center">0.78</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.16</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.01%"><p style="text-align:center">0.14</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.88%"><p style="text-align:center">BOD<sub>5</sub>, mg∙L<sup>−1</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.24%"><p style="text-align:center">0.78</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.11</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.01%"><p style="text-align:center">0.14</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.88%"><p style="text-align:center">TDS, mg∙L<sup>−1</sup></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.24%"><p style="text-align:center">0.68</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.87%"><p style="text-align:center">0.07</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.01%"><p style="text-align:center">0.12</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.88%"><p style="text-align:center">∑=</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.24%"><p style="text-align:center">5.57</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.87%"><p style="text-align:center">1.00</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.01%"><p style="text-align:center">1.00</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>The study’s critical variables, pH, PO<sub>4</sub>-P, TC and BOD<sub>5</sub> presented the highest relative weights. These weights were equivalent to 15% in first parameter and 14% in the next three of the total sum of WQI weights, respectively. This represents an increase of 7.0% and 6.0% in relation to the previous weights (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">
      Table 9
     </xref>). It is important to note that the selected eigenvectors were the highest values for each parameter, except for TU, to give weight to other more relevant parameters (e.g., pH, PO<sub>4</sub>-P, TC, BOD<sub>5</sub>), criteria adopted in several index, as indicated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-63">
      Uddin et al. (2021)
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Water Quality Assessment</title>
    <p>According to the ANOVA and MDS tests, a statistically significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) in water quality between bays was determined, considering NSF-WQI and the WQI<sub>T</sub>. In the first case, average NSF-WQI values were statically similar in all bays, except for Desaguadero and Yunguyo bays (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3(a)">
      Figure 3(a)
     </xref>), but all bays within the moderate range. In the second case, the bays of Moho, Pomata, Pusi and Capachica presented similar average WQIT values, as the bays of Juli, Chucuito and Pilcuyo, but with a significant difference between these two groups (p ≤ 0.05), however, all bays within the moderate range. Yunguyo and Desaguadero bays showed a significant difference with these two groups (p ≤ 0.05), as they were characterized as having bad water quality (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3(b)">
      Figure 3(b)
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>The moderate pollution category recorded in all bays, except Desaguadero and Yunguyo bays (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref>), is related to mesoeutrophic waters (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref>), which in turn are tolerable for manufacturing process water supply, primary contact recreation, landscaping and fish farming for sensitive species (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
      Table 5
     </xref>). Still, the bad pollution category in Desaguadero and Yunguyo bays (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref>) is related to eutrophic waters (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref>), which in turn are tolerable for cooling water supply, secondary contact recreation and fish farming of tolerant species (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
      Table 5
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 3. Assessment of water quality in the bays of Lake Titicaca. (a): Results obtained through the NSF-WQI. (b): Results obtained using WQI<sub>T</sub>. The colors indicate water quality category. Different letters indicate a statistically significant difference between the bays (p ≤ 0.05).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2173021-rId13.jpeg?20240815093749" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. Spatial-Temporal Analysis of Water Quality</title>
    <p>Based on information from the 2015-2020 annual period, the bays in permanent condition of moderate water quality were Moho, Vilquechico and Pomata. On the other hand, the other bays are in the moderate and bad quality water category, where the bays of Yunguyo and Chucuito have more years with bad quality water. In 2020, most bays had water of moderate quality except Yunguyo and Capachica, which had bad water quality (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
      Figure 4
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 4. Comparative map of water quality on the 10 bays of Lake Titicaca according to WQI<sub>T</sub> during the six years (2015-2020). The pie chart content on each piece slice is a WQI<sub>T</sub> color category.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2173021-rId14.jpeg?20240815093750" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_5">
    <title>3.5. Water Quality Assessment</title>
    <p>According to Peru’s water quality standard (Supreme Decree N˚ 004-2017-MINAM), category 4, established for the conservation of the country’s lakes, the parameters that exceeded the standard values were PO<sub>4</sub>-P (0.035 mg∙L<sup>−1</sup>) and BOD<sub>5</sub> (5 mg∙L<sup>−1</sup>) in all bays, and TC (1000 NMP mL<sup>−1</sup>) in Yunguyo bay. DO and pH were within accepted standards (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 5. Water quality assessment in the 10 bays of Lake Titicaca according to Standard Water Quality (SWQ) of Peru (annual period 2015-2020), bar: average values, whiskers: standard deviation, the red dashed horizontal line indicates the SWQ (Supreme Decree N˚ 004-2017-MINAM, category 4, lakes and lagoons).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2173021-rId15.jpeg?20240815093750" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Discussion</title>
   <p>Our study focused on developing a water quality assessment of Lake Titicaca, a waterbody of high ecological, economic and social importance in southern Peru (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-70">
     Zilov, 2013
    </xref>). The deterioration of the lake’s health is caused by complex pollution related to urban demographic growth, inadequate management of solid waste and wastewater, and inadequate sanitary practices (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-52">
     Quispe, 2024
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>Given the need to integrate technical information from the different water quality parameters carried out by Peruvian state agencies, in order to efficiently interpret the water quality condition of Lake Titicaca, we propose the use of the water quality index model, which has the ability to convert multiple variables into a single value that describes water quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-9">
     Banda &amp; Kumarasamy, 2020
    </xref>). To this end, we calibrated a Water Quality Index for Lake Titicaca, the WQI<sub>T</sub>, based on the original index proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-12">
     Brown et al. (1970)
    </xref> for the US National Sanitation Foundation, the NSF-WQI. Comparing the efficiency of these two indices, the WQI<sub>T</sub> revealed important differences in relation to the NSF-WQI, presenting water quality weights of less importance for the parameters T, DO and TU, and weights of greater importance for the parameters pH, NO<sub>3</sub>, PO<sub>4</sub>-P, TC, BOD<sub>5</sub> and TDS, highly related to eutrophication processes.</p>
   <p>In fact, the water quality of Lake Titicaca established by applying the WQI<sub>T</sub> showed a variation from moderate polluted bays to bad quality bays, such as Desaguadero and Yunguyo, and no bay reached good or very good quality. On the contrary, applying the NSF-WQI all bays were classified as waters of moderate quality. The water quality assessment of the Yunguyo and Desaguadero bays applying the WQI<sub>T</sub> showed a significant difference with the others bays (p ≤ 0.05), being characterized as having bad water quality.</p>
   <p>Regarding phosphate, one of the parameters most related to eutrophication, these two bays had an average concentration of 0.38 ± 0.4 mg∙L<sup>−1</sup>, and can be classified as hypereutrophic, as this average exceeded the maximum limit concentration for this category, 0.211 mg∙L<sup>−1</sup>, following the classification adopted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-10">
     Barreto et al. (2013)
    </xref>, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
     Table 4
    </xref>. Therefore, the uses attributable to this condition are only irrigation and energy production (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
     Table 5
    </xref>). The results applying the NSF-WQI were unable to identify this significative difference, as all bays were classified as waters of moderate quality. This result indicates that the calibration of the WQI<sub>T</sub> was adequate, as it allows inferring and estimating the water quality of Lake Titicaca with greater precision, where the water ecosystem health is deteriorated by wastewater pollution, a common occurrence in urbanized lakes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-53">
     Radwan et al., 2019
    </xref>), or aquaculture pollution, a triggering factor for the proliferation of cyanobacteria bloom according to studies carried out in lakes where this aquaculture activity takes place (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-13">
     Buley et al., 2021
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-66">
     Xu et al., 2022
    </xref>). Thus, the WQI<sub>T</sub> calibrated for Lake Titicaca can be used as an efficient tool to assess water quality in high Andean lentic waterbodies in South America, which do not exist (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-63">
     Uddin et al., 2021
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>According to Peru’s water quality standard for category 4, established for the conservation of the country’s lakes, the parameters that exceeded the standard values were PO<sub>4</sub>-P (0.035 mg∙L<sup>−1</sup>) and BOD<sub>5</sub> (5 mg∙L<sup>−1</sup>) in all bays, and TC (1000 MPN mL<sup>−1</sup>) in Yunguyo bay. These high values are directly related to eutrophication processes. A similar situation was found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-7">
     Bajaña et al. (2022)
    </xref>, working in two reservoirs in the Paute River Hydrographic Basin, south inter‑Andean region of Ecuador, where the PCA results indicated that the eutrophication gradient was positively correlated with phosphate (r = 0.83) and BOD<sub>5</sub> (r = 0.83), where the average total phosphate concentration was 0.73 ± 1.51 mg∙L<sup>−1</sup>, classifying the basin water as hypereutrophic. Eutrophication is also one of the main environmental problems in aquatic systems in southern Brazil (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-41">
     Lobo et al., 2010, 2015
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-37">
     Klamt et al., 2019
    </xref>), highlighting that the increase of nutrients in a waterbody, mainly phosphate, is one of the main sources of eutrophication, mostly by agricultural fertilizers, animal waste, domestic and industrial sewage. Eutrophication is a process that can render an aquatic ecosystem unusable for human supply, power generation, and leisure area (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-49">
     Powley et al., 2016
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>Eutrophication and algal bloom events are common in waterbodies with high population density, such as Lake Taihu in China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-67">
     Yan et al., 2022
    </xref>), Lake Victoria in Africa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-55">
     Simiyu et al., 2022
    </xref>), Lake Ontario in Canada (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-44">
     Molot et al., 2022
    </xref>) or Lake Erie in the United States (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-27">
     Francy et al., 2016
    </xref>). For South America, we show the context of water quality in Lake Titicaca, where algal blooms were reported in the inner bay of Puno (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-26">
     Farfán et al., 2015
    </xref>) and Cohana (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-2">
     Achá et al., 2018
    </xref>), places with high phosphorus loads from untreated waters in Puno (Peru) in the first case, and La Paz (Bolivia) in the second case, a worrying situation. However, in our study, we reported a eutrophication process based on high values of PO<sub>4</sub>-P (0.09 to 0.46 mg∙L<sup>−1</sup>) for all bays of Lake Titicaca, critical because the waters could develop algal blooms at these levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-65">
     Walker &amp; Havens, 1995
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-31">
     Gu et al., 2020
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-57">
     Song et al., 2024
    </xref>). Likewise, we draw attention to the high levels of coliforms (&gt;1000 MPN ml∙L<sup>−1</sup>) in the Yunguyo and Desaguadero bays, which is risky for human health (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-56">
     Soller et al., 2010
    </xref>), since these places are frequented by tourists (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-28">
     Gascón, 2022
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>The high BOD<sub>5</sub> values in the bays in Lake Titicaca are mainly influenced by wastewaters from nearby cities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-26">
     Farfán et al., 2015
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-33">
     Heredia et al., 2022
    </xref>) and the aquaculture industry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-59">
     Tanjung et al., 2024
    </xref>), which focuses on rainbow trout aquaculture developed in the littoral zone of the Lake Titicaca (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-19">
     Chura &amp; Mollocondo, 2016
    </xref>). BOD<sub>5</sub> plays an important role in assessing water pollution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-38">
     Koda et al., 2017
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-58">
     Tanjung et al., 2019
    </xref>), highlighting that this parameter explains the biological oxidation processes, knowledge necessary to understand the water quality state (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-50">
     Qi et al., 2021
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-3">
     Aguilar-Torrejón et al., 2023
    </xref>). Organic matter originates from various anthropic wastes and natural process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-47">
     Pivokonsky et al., 2006
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135251-60">
     Tanjung et al., 2022
    </xref>).</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Conclusion</title>
   <p>We concluded that the WQI<sub>T</sub> calibration was adequate, as it allows inferring and estimating the water quality of Lake Titicaca (Peruvian sector), with greater precision, based on physical, chemical, and microbiological parameters, where the predominant condition was moderate quality and bad quality in the 10 bays analyzed.</p>
   <p>The deterioration of the lake’s health is caused by complex pollution related to urban growth, inadequate solid waste and wastewater management, and inadequate sanitation practices, highlighting the need for water management to mitigate the eutrophication process. In the future, it is necessary to have information available that allows estimating lake quality indices, so it is extremely important that the competent authorities carry out periodic monitoring (seasonal frequency) in the evaluated sectors and expand new sampling locations that need to be evaluated to improve water quality management.</p>
   <p>The WQI<sub>T</sub> calibrated for Lake Titicaca can be used as an efficient tool to assess water quality in high Andean lentic waterbodies in South America.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>We would like to thank the University of Santa Cruz do Sul, Brazil, for granting an institutional scholarship to the first author to pursue a postgraduate course in the Environmental Technology Program. We also thank the Lake Titicaca Special Project of the Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation of Peru.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Abbasi, T.,&amp;Abbasi, S. (2012). Water Quality Indices. Elsevier. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/C2010-0-69472-7
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Achá, D., Guédron, S., Amouroux, D., Point, D., Lazzaro, X., Fernandez, P. E. et al. (2018). Algal Bloom Exacerbates Hydrogen Sulfide and Methylmercury Contamination in the Emblematic High-Altitude Lake Titicaca. Geosciences, 8, Article 438. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8120438
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Aguilar-Torrejón, J. A., Balderas-Hernández, P., Roa-Morales, G., Barrera-Díaz, C. E., Rodríguez-Torres, I.,&amp;Torres-Blancas, T. (2023). Relationship, Importance, and Development of Analytical Techniques: COD, BOD, and, TOC in Water—An Overview through Time. SN Applied Sciences, 5, Article No. 118. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-023-05318-7
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ali, E. M.,&amp;Khairy, H. M. (2016). Environmental Assessment of Drainage Water Impacts on Water Quality and Eutrophication Level of Lake Idku, Egypt. Environmental Pollution, 216, 437-449. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.05.064
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     American Public Health Association (APHA) (1995). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (23th ed.). American Water Works Association.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Archundia, D., Duwig, C., Lehembre, F., Chiron, S., Morel, M., Prado, B. et al. (2017). Antibiotic Pollution in the Katari Subcatchment of the Titicaca Lake: Major Transformation Products and Occurrence of Resistance Genes. Science of The Total Environment, 576, 671-682. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.129
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bajaña, L. S., Martínez-Fresneda, M., Navarro, J. C., de S. Celente, G.,&amp;Lobo, E. A. (2022). Water Quality Index (WQI) Calibration in the Paute River Hydrographical Basin, South Inter-Andean Region of Ecuador, Based on the Environmental Agreement Nº 097-A. Sustainable Water Resources Management, 8, Article No. 5. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-021-00590-0
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Baltodano, A., Agramont, A., Reusen, I.,&amp;van Griensven, A. (2022). Land Cover Change and Water Quality: How Remote Sensing Can Help Understand Driver-Impact Relations in the Lake Titicaca Basin. Water, 14, Article 1021. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/w14071021
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Banda, T. D.,&amp;Kumarasamy, M. V. (2020). Development of Water Quality Indices (WQIs): A Review. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 29, 2011-2021. &gt;https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/110526
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Barreto, L., Barros, F., Bonomo, P., Rocha, F.,&amp;Amorim, J. (2013). Eutrofização em rios brasileiros. Enciclopédia Biosfera, 9, 1-15. &gt;https://conhecer.org.br/ojs/index.php/biosfera/article/view/3521 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Biamont-Rojas, I. E., Cardoso-Silva, S., Figueira, R. C. L., Kim, B. S. M., Alfaro-Tapia, R.,&amp;Pompêo, M. (2023). Spatial Distribution of Arsenic and Metals Suggest a High Ecotoxicological Potential in Puno Bay, Lake Titicaca, Peru. Science of The Total Environment, 871, Article ID: 162051. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162051
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Brown, R. M., McClelland, N. I., Deininger, R. A.,&amp;Tozer, R. G. (1970). A Water Quality Index—Do We Dare? Water and Sewage Works, 117, 339-343.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Buley, R. P., Adams, C., Belfiore, A. P., Fernandez-Figueroa, E. G., Gladfelter, M. F., Garner, B. et al. (2021). Field Evaluation of Seven Products to Control Cyanobacterial Blooms in Aquaculture. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 29971-29983. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12708-0 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bunting, L., Leavitt, P. R., Gibson, C. E., McGee, E. J.,&amp;Hall, V. A. (2007). Degradation of Water Quality in Lough Neagh, Northern Ireland, by Diffuse Nitrogen Flux from a Phosphorus‐Rich Catchment. Limnology and Oceanography, 52, 354-369. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2007.52.1.0354
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Burford, M. A., Carey, C. C., Hamilton, D. P., Huisman, J., Paerl, H. W., Wood, S. A. et al. (2020). Perspective: Advancing the Research Agenda for Improving Understanding of Cyanobacteria in a Future of Global Change. Harmful Algae, 91, Article ID: 101601. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2019.04.004
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Carlson, R. E. (1977). A Trophic State Index for Lakes. Limnology and Oceanography, 22, 361-369. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1977.22.2.0361
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chidiac, S., El Najjar, P., Ouaini, N., El Rayess, Y.,&amp;El Azzi, D. (2023). A Comprehensive Review of Water Quality Indices (WQIs): History, Models, Attempts and Perspectives. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 22, 349-395. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-023-09650-7
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chui, H. N., Roque, B., Huaquisto, E., Sardón, D. L., Belizario, G.,&amp;Calatayud, A. P. (2021). Heavy Metals in Intensive Farmed Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) from Northwestern Titicaca Lake. Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú, 32, e20398. &gt;https://doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v32i3.20398
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chura, R.,&amp;Mollocondo, H. (2016). Desarrollo de la acuicultura en el Lago Titicaca (Perú). Revista AquaTIC. &gt;https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=49422781002 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chura-Cruz, R., Cubillos S., L. A., Tam M., J., Segura Z., M.,&amp;Villanueva Q., C. (2013). Relationship between Lake Water Level and Rainfall on the Landings of Argentinian Silverside Odontesthes bonariensis (Valenciennes, 1835) in the Peruvian Sector of the Titicaca Lake from 1981 to 2010. Ecología Aplicada, 12, 19-28. &gt;https://doi.org/10.21704/rea.v12i1-2.434&gt;http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1726-22162013000100003&amp;lang=es 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Costantini, M. L., Sabetta, L., Mancinelli, G.,&amp;Rossi, L. (2004). Spatial Variability of the Decomposition Rate of Schoenoplectus tatora in a Polluted Area of Lake Titicaca. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 20, 325-335. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266467403001214
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dejoux, C.,&amp;Iltis, A. (1992). Lake Titicaca: A Synthesis of Limnological Knowledge. Springer.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Delgado, A., Cotrina, A., Cueto, J., Figueroa, R., Huarcaya, J., Lopez, H.,&amp;Andrade-Arenas, L. (2022). Assessment of Water Quality in Titicaca Lake, Peru Using the Grey Clustering Method. Engineering Letters, 30, 847-853. &gt;https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85130685200&amp;partnerID=40&amp;md5=3ccad2e9689f91d6c94c513af901e62a 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Duquesne, F., Vallaeys, V., Vidaurre, P. J.,&amp;Hanert, E. (2021). A Coupled Ecohydrodynamic Model to Predict Algal Blooms in Lake Titicaca. Ecological Modelling, 440, Article ID: 109418. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109418
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     El-Serehy, H. A., Abdallah, H. S., Al-Misned, F. A., Al-Farraj, S. A.,&amp;Al-Rasheid, K. A. (2018). Assessing Water Quality and Classifying Trophic Status for Scientifically Based Managing the Water Resources of the Lake Timsah, the Lake with Salinity Stratification along the Suez Canal. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 25, 1247-1256. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.05.022
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Farfán, D. F. B., Palomino Calli, R. P., Moreno Terrazas, E. G., Peralta, C. G.,&amp;Montesinos-Tubée, D. B. (2015). Water Quality of the Inner Puno Bay, Titicaca Lake, during Summer 2011. Revista Peruana de Biología, 22, 335-340. &gt;https://doi.org/10.15381/rpb.v22i3.11440
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Francy, D. S., Brady, A. M. G., Ecker, C. D., Graham, J. L., Stelzer, E. A., Struffolino, P. et al. (2016). Estimating Microcystin Levels at Recreational Sites in Western Lake Erie and Ohio. Harmful Algae, 58, 23-34. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2016.07.003
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gascón, J. (2022). Plastic in Lake Titicaca: Tourism and Management of Non-Biodegradable Waste in the Andes. Worldwide Waste, 5, 1-11. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5334/wwwj.78
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gauch, H. G. (1982). Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology. Cambridge University Press. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511623332
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gleick, P. H. (1993). Water in Crisis: A Guide to the World’s Fresh Water Resources. In Water in Crisis: A Guide to the World’s Fresh Water Resources. Oxford University Press.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gu, P., Li, Q., Zhang, H., Luo, X., Zhang, W., Zheng, Z. et al. (2020). Effects of Cyanobacteria on Phosphorus Cycling and Other Aquatic Organisms in Simulated Eutrophic Ecosystems. Water, 12, Article 2265. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/w12082265
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T.,&amp;Ryan, P. D. (2001). Past: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4, XIX-XX. &gt;https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-34748886657&amp;partnerID=40&amp;md5=b32644b1c039465d71cd1c90d0cd42e6 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Heredia, C., Guédron, S., Point, D., Perrot, V., Campillo, S., Verin, C. et al. (2022). Anthropogenic Eutrophication of Lake Titicaca (Bolivia) Revealed by Carbon and Nitrogen Stable Isotopes Fingerprinting. Science of The Total Environment, 845, Article ID: 157286. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157286
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Horton, R. K. (1965). An Index Number System for Rating Water Quality. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 37, 300-306.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Huang, L.,&amp;Zhou, M. (2021). Trends in Global Research on Sanitation: A 30-Year Perspective from 1990 to 2019. Environmental Reviews, 29, 75-86. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2020-0030
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Huisman, J., Codd, G. A., Paerl, H. W., Ibelings, B. W., Verspagen, J. M. H.,&amp;Visser, P. M. (2018). Cyanobacterial Blooms. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 16, 471-483. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-018-0040-1
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Klamt, R. A., Lobo, E. A., Costa, A. B. d.,&amp;Delevati, D. M. (2019). Evaluation of Water Resource Preservation Areas in the Hydrographical Basin of Andreas Stream, RS, Brazil, Using Environmental Monitoring Programs. Ambiente e Agua—An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Science, 14, e2307. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4136/ambi-agua.2307
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Koda, E., Miszkowska, A.,&amp;Sieczka, A. (2017). Levels of Organic Pollution Indicators in Groundwater at the Old Landfill and Waste Management Site. Applied Sciences, 7, Article 638. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/app7060638
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lee, T. A., Rollwagen-Bollens, G.,&amp;Bollens, S. M. (2015). The Influence of Water Quality Variables on Cyanobacterial Blooms and Phytoplankton Community Composition in a Shallow Temperate Lake. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187, Article No. 315. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4550-2
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Loayza, E., Trigoso Barrientos, A. C.,&amp;Janssens, G. P. J. (2022). Evidence of Microplastics in Water and Commercial Fish from a High-Altitude Mountain Lake (lake Titicaca). PeerJ, 10, e14112. &gt;https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14112
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref41">
    <label>41</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lobo, E. A., Schuch, M., Heinrich, C. G., da Costa, A. B., Düpont, A., Wetzel, C. E. et al. (2015). Development of the Trophic Water Quality Index (TWQI) for Subtropical Temperate Brazilian Lotic Systems. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187, Article No. 354. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4586-3
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref42">
    <label>42</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lobo, E. A., Wetzel, C. E., Ector, L., Katoh, K., Blanco, S.,&amp;Mayama, S. (2010). Response of Epilithic Diatom Communities to Environmental Gradients in Subtropical Temperate Brazilian Rivers. Limnetica, 29, 323-340. &gt;https://doi.org/10.23818/limn.29.27
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref43">
    <label>43</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mancilla, G. M. (2016). Explicit Arguments, Hidden Biases: Uncovering the Role of Institutional Relationships in a Dispute over Scientific Data in Lake Titicaca (Bolivia). Society&amp;Natural Resources, 29, 1110-1123. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2016.1150540
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref44">
    <label>44</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Molot, L. A., Depew, D. C., Zastepa, A., Arhonditsis, G. B., Watson, S. B.,&amp;Verschoor, M. J. (2022). Long-term and Seasonal Nitrate Trends Illustrate Potential Prevention of Large Cyanobacterial Biomass by Sediment Oxidation in Hamilton Harbour, Lake Ontario. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 48, 971-984. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2022.05.014
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref45">
    <label>45</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Moretto, D. L., Panta, R. E., Costa, A. B. d.,&amp;Lobo, E. A. (2012). Calibration of Water Quality Index (WQI) Based on Resolution Nº 357/2005 of the Environment National Council (CONAMA). Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia, 24, 29-42. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1590/s2179-975x2012005000024
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref46">
    <label>46</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Paerl, H. W.,&amp;Huisman, J. (2008). Blooms Like It Hot. Science, 320, 57-58. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155398
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref47">
    <label>47</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pivokonsky, M., Kloucek, O.,&amp;Pivokonska, L. (2006). Evaluation of the Production, Composition and Aluminum and Iron Complexation of Algogenic Organic Matter. Water Research, 40, 3045-3052. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.06.028
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref48">
    <label>48</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Posselt, E. L., Costa, A. B.,&amp;Lobo, E. A. (2015). IQAData 2015 Software. Registration at INPI BR 512015000890-0, Master Program in Industrial Systems and Processes (PPGSPI), Environmental Technology Program—Master and Doctorate (PPGTA), UNISC.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref49">
    <label>49</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Powley, H. R., Dürr, H. H., Lima, A. T., Krom, M. D.,&amp;Van Cappellen, P. (2016). Direct Discharges of Domestic Wastewater Are a Major Source of Phosphorus and Nitrogen to the Mediterranean Sea. Environmental Science&amp;Technology, 50, 8722-8730. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01742
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref50">
    <label>50</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Qi, M., Han, Y., Zhao, Z.,&amp;Li, Y. (2021). Integrated Determination of Chemical Oxygen Demand and Biochemical Oxygen Demand. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 30, 1785-1794. &gt;https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/122439
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref51">
    <label>51</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Quiroga-Flores, R., Guédron, S.,&amp;Achá, D. (2021). High Methylmercury Uptake by Green Algae in Lake Titicaca: Potential Implications for Remediation. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 207, Article ID: 111256. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111256
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref52">
    <label>52</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Quispe, J. E. T. (2024). Actitudes y prácticas ambientales de la población urbana de Puno, altiplano andino. La Granja, 39, 43-62. &gt;https://doi.org/10.17163/lgr.n39.2024.03
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref53">
    <label>53</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Radwan, S., Kowalik, W.,&amp;Kowalczyk, C. (1990). Occurrence of Heavy Metals in Water, Phytoplankton and Zooplankton of a Mesotrophic Lake in Eastern Poland. Science of The Total Environment, 96, 115-120. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(90)90011-i 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref54">
    <label>54</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Reid, A. J., Carlson, A. K., Creed, I. F., Eliason, E. J., Gell, P. A., Johnson, P. T. J. et al. (2019). Emerging Threats and Persistent Conservation Challenges for Freshwater Biodiversity. Biological Reviews, 94, 849-873. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12480
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref55">
    <label>55</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Simiyu, B. M., Amukhuma, H. S., Sitoki, L., Okello, W.,&amp;Kurmayer, R. (2022). Interannual Variability of Water Quality Conditions in the Nyanza Gulf of Lake Victoria, Kenya. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 48, 97-109. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2021.10.017
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref56">
    <label>56</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Soller, J. A., Bartrand, T., Ashbolt, N. J., Ravenscroft, J.,&amp;Wade, T. J. (2010). Estimating the Primary Etiologic Agents in Recreational Freshwaters Impacted by Human Sources of Faecal Contamination. Water Research, 44, 4736-4747. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.07.064
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref57">
    <label>57</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Song, Q., Huang, S., Yang, S.,&amp;Zheng, Z. (2024). Relationship between Algal Bloom and Phosphorus in Water Environment in Zhushan Bay, Taihu Lake. Water, Air,&amp;Soil Pollution, 235, Article No. 69. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-023-06866-9
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref58">
    <label>58</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tanjung, R. H. R., Hamuna, B.,&amp;Alianto, A. (2019). Assessment of Water Quality and Pollution Index in Coastal Waters of Mimika, Indonesia. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 20, 87-94. &gt;https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/95266 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref59">
    <label>59</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tanjung, R. H. R., Indrayani, E., Agamawan, L. P. I.,&amp;Hamuna, B. (2024). Water Quality Assessment to Determine the Trophic State and Suitability of Lake Sentani (indonesia) for Various Utilisation Purposes. Water Cycle, 5, 99-108. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watcyc.2024.02.006
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref60">
    <label>60</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tanjung, R., Yonas, M., Suwito, S., Maury, H., Sarungu, Y.,&amp;Hamuna, B. (2022). Analysis of Surface Water Quality of Four Rivers in Jayapura Regency, Indonesia: CCME-WQI Approach. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 23, 73-82. &gt;https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/143998
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref61">
    <label>61</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     The R Development Core Team (2013). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref62">
    <label>62</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Thornton, J.,&amp;Rast, W. (1994). The Management of International River Basins. Quality of Continental Waters in Mercosur. Associação Brasiliera de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH).
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref63">
    <label>63</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Uddin, M. G., Nash, S.,&amp;Olbert, A. I. (2021). A Review of Water Quality Index Models and Their Use for Assessing Surface Water Quality. Ecological Indicators, 122, Article ID: 107218. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107218
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref64">
    <label>64</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vinçon-Leite, B.,&amp;Casenave, C. (2019). Modelling Eutrophication in Lake Ecosystems: A Review. Science of the Total Environment, 651, 2985-3001. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.320
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref65">
    <label>65</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Walker, W. W.,&amp;Havens, K. E. (1995). Relating Algal Bloom Frequencies to Phosphorus Concentrations in Lake Okeechobee. Lake and Reservoir Management, 11, 77-83. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/07438149509354200
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref66">
    <label>66</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Xu, H., Liu, W., Zhang, S., Wei, J., Li, Y.,&amp;Pei, H. (2022). Cyanobacterial Bloom Intensities Determine Planktonic Eukaryote Community Structure and Stability. Science of The Total Environment, 838, Article 156637. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156637 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref67">
    <label>67</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yan, L., Xu, Z., Hu, Y., Wang, Y., Zhou, F., Gao, X. et al. (2022). Cyanobacteria Bloom Hazard Function and Preliminary Application in Lake Taihu, China. Chemosphere, 307, Article ID: 136122. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136122
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref68">
    <label>68</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yao, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, L.,&amp;Zhou, Y. (2018). A Bibliometric Review of Nitrogen Research in Eutrophic Lakes and Reservoirs. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 66, 274-285. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2016.10.022
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref69">
    <label>69</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zar, J. H. (1984). Biostatistical Analysis (3rd ed.). Prentice-Hall Internacional.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135251-ref70">
    <label>70</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zilov, E. A. (2013). Water Resources and the Sustainable Development of Humankind: International Cooperation in the Rational Use of Freshwater-Lake Resources: Conclusions from Materials of Foreign Studies. Water Resources, 40, 84-95. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1134/s0097807812030116
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>