<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    gep
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2327-4336
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2327-4344
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/gep.2024.128004
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    gep-135161
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Earth 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Environmental Sciences
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Using TiO
    <sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal and TiO
    <sub>2</sub>-Diatomite for Photodisinfection in Washing Machine Wastewater
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Daphne Montesuma
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Ferro
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Paloma Otsuka
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Kotani
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Regina
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Affonso
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Nilce
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Ortiz
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aChemistry and Environment Center, Nuclear and Energy Research Institute, IPEN, São Paulo, Brazil
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aBiotechnology Center, Nuclear and Energy Research Institute, IPEN, São Paulo, Brazil
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     01
    </day> 
    <month>
     08
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    12
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    08
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    62
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    79
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      2,
     </day>
     <month>
      May
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      6,
     </day>
     <month>
      May
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      6,
     </day>
     <month>
      August
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    The photodisinfection process using biomolded semiconductor photocatalysts can inactivate bacteria in wastewater washing machine samples. The comparative study evaluated the photocatalyst material titanium dioxide (TiO
    <sub>2</sub>) synthesized with diatomite and biocharcoal biotemplate (TiO
    <sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal and TiO
    <sub>2</sub>-Diatomite) in photodisinfection processes using domestic washing machine wastewater samples, the results of bacterial inactivation were above 96%. The efficiency of the photodisinfection process was evaluated by counting the number of colonies of the bacteria. Experiments under LED solar lamps presented similar bacterial inactivation, and a correlation with kinetic models. The kinetic study demonstrated a curved regression, indicating a better fit with the Hom model. A tail at the end of the modeling curve indicates the presence of a high concentration of inactive bacteria in the medium, while a shoulder at the beginning of the curve suggests a heterogeneous sample with a high concentration of gram-positive bacteria. The toxicity tests performed with wastewater samples without light exposure indicated low toxicity for both materials. The study presented promising disinfection results for an accessible and efficient photo-sterilization process of water contaminated with bacteria using abundant solar and renewable energy throughout the national territory. 
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Photodisinfection
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Diatomite
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Biocharcoal
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Wastewater
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Titanium Dioxide 
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Water disinfection using sustainable treatment is paramount since traditional chemical disinfection methods have severe environmental drawbacks, such as the formation of toxic disinfection by-products (DBPs) causing several diseases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-10">
     Gopal et al., 2007
    </xref>). In addition, the increased weather and climate extreme events reduced water security. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-12">
     IPCC, 2023
    </xref>) 2023 report presented the possibility of prolonged droughts and floods, directly impacting water capture and supply. These events can also affect public health by increasing the incidence of waterborne diseases, such as diarrhea and dysentery (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-13">
     Levy et al., 2018
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-12">
     IPCC, 2023
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>Since 2016 Brazil committed to the ONU 2030 Agenda, which includes 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). These goals involve implementing sustainable solutions to ensure health, clean water, and sanitation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-27">
     UNDG, 2016
    </xref>). Approximately 15 million people live in urban areas without safe water in Brazil. In rural areas, 25 million people have access only to basic water safety levels. Additionally, for 2.3 million people, the water available for drinking and personal hygiene lacks treatment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-26">
     UNICEF &amp; WHO, 2021
    </xref>). Therefore, the development of affordable and sustainable water treatment becomes necessary.</p>
   <p>The application of the widely reported heterogeneous photocatalysis with titanium dioxide (TiO<sub>2</sub>) as a semiconductor is due to its accessibility and high photocatalytic activity in anatase form (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-28">
     Wang et al., 2012
    </xref>). In the irradiation of TiO<sub>2</sub> particles by UV light, the conduction band electron jumps to the valence band and forms the electron-hole pairs promoting the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) responsible for the microorganism’s inactivation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-20">
     Ortiz et al., 2018
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-21">
     Shimizu et al., 2019
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>The photocatalyst efficiency is related to optimizing electron-hole recombination and surface properties to improve photon absorption and intensify reaction kinetics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-6">
     Fawzi et al., 2022
    </xref>). Diatomite powder is an attractive semiconductor support due to its enhanced surface area and homogeneous pores (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-3">
     Chen et al., 2019
    </xref>). The formation of the structure of diatomite was by the accumulation of small frustules (cell walls or outer layers) of diatom algae, and its main chemical component is amorphous silica (SiO<sub>2</sub>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-30">
     Wu et al., 2019
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>Biochar is a material made by pyrolysis of biomass. It is mostly composed of carbon, and during thermal degradation the porosity increases greatly, also increasing the surface area, this characteristic facilitates the exchange of loads (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-25">
     Trazzi et al., 2018
    </xref>). Micronized biochar acts as a biotemplate and contributes to the synergistic effect, multiplying the results of photodisinfection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-17">
     Mesones et al., 2020
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>Since the pioneering study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-16">
     Matsunaga et al. (1985)
    </xref>, many researchers investigated the utilization of semiconductor photocatalysis for inactivating many pathogenic microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-4">
     Coleman et al., 2005
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-19">
     Ortega-Gómez et al., 2013
    </xref>). Among these studies, the most extensively reported investigations revolve around the bactericidal effects of TiO<sub>2</sub> photocatalysis on the inactivation of E. coli suspensions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-15">
     Marugán et al., 2008
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-21">
     Shimizu et al., 2019
    </xref>). Additionally, several studies have specifically examined the influence of photocatalytic process parameters, such as light intensity and TiO<sub>2</sub> concentration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-7">
     Ganguly et al., 2018
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-14">
     Marugán et al., 2011
    </xref>). However, few studies have reported bacterial inactivation on real wastewater samples.</p>
   <p>Washing machines can clean clothes but don’t sterilize and inactivate microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-2">
     Callewaert et al., 2015
    </xref>), and those contaminated wastewater goes to the domestic sewerage system and possibly to the water resources. Researchers investigated such greywater samples and found a heterogeneous medium with gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-8">
     Gattlen et al., 2010
    </xref>). The gram-negative bacteria present a more complex cell wall due to multiple layers in its composition, such as the outer membrane, combined with the peptidoglycan layer. On the other hand, the gram-positive bacteria have a thicker cell wall due to the higher thickness of the peptidoglycan layer, this characteristic makes them mechanically more rigid than gram-negative bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-24">
     Tortora et al., 2016
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>The project developed and improved the bacterial inactivation process using solar radiation on contaminated greywater samples collected on domestic washing machines. The comparative processes used 0.5 g∙L<sup>−1</sup> of TiO<sub>2</sub>-Diatomite (DT), 0.5 g∙L<sup>−1</sup> of TiO<sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal (BC) and determined the photodisinfection kinetics model.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Methods</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. TiO<sub>2</sub>-Diatomite and TiO<sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal Synthesis and Characterization</title>
    <p>The TiO<sub>2</sub>-Diatomite was prepared by sol-gel method mixing 10 mL of titanium isopropoxide and 0.125 mg∙mL<sup>−1</sup> of commercial diatomite in nature. Mixing the final suspension for 2 hours, and after 1 hour of settling, the formed solid was in the oven at 100˚C for 24 hours to obtain TiO<sub>2</sub>-shaped microstructures. After drying, the disaggregation of the material was manually and sieved (0.60 mm). The synthesized powder characterization analyses used the TiO<sub>2</sub>-Diatomite material prepared with 0.125 mg∙mL<sup>−1</sup> of diatomite.</p>
    <p>The TiO<sub>2</sub> synthesis by the sol-gel process used 10 mL of titanium isopropoxide and 0.125 mg∙mL<sup>−1</sup> of Biocharcoal powder. The acid hydrolysis lasted 2 hours, and after 16 hours of settling the material was placed in the oven for 5 hours at 100˚C. The synthesized powder characterization analyses used the TiO<sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal material prepared with 0.125 mg∙mL<sup>−1</sup> of biocharcoal.</p>
    <p>The best formulation of the photodisinfection experiments used 0.5 g∙100mL<sup>−1</sup> of TiO<sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal and TiO<sub>2</sub>-Diatomite.</p>
    <p>The analyses of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Brunauer-Teller-Emmett (BET) were in the Materials Characterization Laboratory (LCT) at the Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo (USP). For SEM analysis, the application of carbon coating (graphite) ensured the passage of current and the production of secondary electrons used for image formation.</p>
    <p>The samples prepared to determine the surface area of the TiO<sub>2</sub>-Diatomite, and TiO<sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal materials by BET used the equipment at 150˚C for degassing and used the Nitrogen gas at 77 K with a pressure variation ranging from 35.88 to 143.65 mmHg and an equilibrium time of 5 seconds for both samples. The mass of the TiO<sub>2</sub>-Diatomite sample analyzed was 0.2735 g, and for the TiO<sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal sample, it was 0.6348 g.</p>
    <p>In the thermogravimetric analysis (TG-DTA), the sample mass was measured as a function of temperature and time under controlled heating conditions with either nitrogen (N<sub>2</sub>) or oxygen (O<sub>2</sub>) as the inert or oxidizing gas, respectively, at a flow rate of 40 mL∙min<sup>−1</sup> to 60 mL∙min<sup>−1</sup>. The analysis was conducted at the Analytical Center of the Institute of Chemistry (IQ), University of São Paulo (USP), using 13.279 mg of synthesized TiO<sub>2</sub>-Diatomite, 8.870 mg of TiO<sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal and the temperature varied from 10˚C to 900˚C.</p>
    <p>X-ray diffractometry is a technique used to verify the crystalline structure of a compound. TiO<sub>2</sub> can be found in more than one crystalline form, which can be Anatase, Rutile and Bruquite. The analysis was carried out in equipment that uses a stationary copper (Cu) tube as an X-ray source (30 kV, 15 mA), under the angle 2θ (2 theta), conducted at the Analytical Center of the Institute of Chemistry (IQ), University of São Paulo (USP).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Photodisinfection Process</title>
    <p>The collection of the greywater samples was from a domestic washing machine after the rinse step. The lather step used different types of clothes but only neutral soap addition. The dilution of the collected samples was with 0.9% NaCl and installed in the refrigerator for sample conservancy.</p>
    <p>The photoreactor built in the Institute has an Erlenmeyer used for the wastewater sample and the addition of the synthesized material, all set closed with sterilized cotton in the upper part. The cover doesn’t interfere with the oxygen transference during the experiments. The reactor promotes the experiments in a controlled environment inside a solar chamber. The LED lamps were installed inside the chamber.</p>
    <p>The total process time of all experiments was 60 minutes. The first aliquot collection (time: 0) of all experiments was before radiation exposure, and then the reactor was exposed to radiation with the subsequent collection every 15 minutes. During all processes, the pH range was between 5.0 and 5.5, with the addition of 0.5 g∙L<sup>−1</sup> TiO<sub>2</sub>-Diatomite or 0.5 g∙L<sup>−1</sup> of TiO<sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal in the reactors.</p>
    <p>The toxicity tests lasted 60 minutes and were carried out in the solar chamber without exposure to light with all parameters controlled. For the process to correlate with the photodisinfection test, the wastewater and 0.5 g∙L<sup>−1</sup> of the synthesized photocatalyst were added to the reactor. The collection of aliquots of the suspension began at minute 0 before the reaction, and the remaining collections were at minutes 15, 30, 45 and 60 of agitation.</p>
    <p>The preparation of Agar Luria-Bertani (LB) nutrient cultures was for Petri plates (90 × 15 mm) used to assess the number of bacterial colonies in each collected aliquot. All collections were at sterilized laminar flow hood, and 20 µL of the sampled solution taken at different exposure times was spread on the LB surface, followed by the addition of 20 µL of saline solution (0.9% NaCl). After the complete aliquots collections, the Petri dishes incubation was at 37˚C for 16 hours.</p>
    <p>The bacterial counting (CFU) of bacterial colonies observed in different times were conducted through high-resolution photography, processed using the “GIMP” software, and analyzed with OpenCFU software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-9">
      Geissmann, 2013
     </xref>). For bacterial counts and kinetic calculations 6 samples of photodisinfection (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>) and 6 samples of toxicity tests (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>) were selected for this work.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-"></xref>Table 1. Photodisinfection experiments parameters.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Experiment Identification</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.10%"><p style="text-align:center">Radiation</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="33.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Dilution Proportion</p><p style="text-align:center">(0.9% NaCl)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="22.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Temperature</p><p style="text-align:center">(˚C)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">1DT</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.10%"><p style="text-align:center">LED</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="33.00%"><p style="text-align:center">1:10</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="22.90%"><p style="text-align:center">23.50</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">2DT</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.10%"><p style="text-align:center">LED</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.00%"><p style="text-align:center">1:100</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.90%"><p style="text-align:center">22.90</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">3DT</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.10%"><p style="text-align:center">LED</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.00%"><p style="text-align:center">1:100</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.90%"><p style="text-align:center">23.00</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">1BC</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.10%"><p style="text-align:center">LED</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.00%"><p style="text-align:center">1:20</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.90%"><p style="text-align:center">20.60</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">2BC</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.10%"><p style="text-align:center">LED</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.00%"><p style="text-align:center">1:20</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.90%"><p style="text-align:center">23.60</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">3BC</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.10%"><p style="text-align:center">LED</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.00%"><p style="text-align:center">1:20</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.90%"><p style="text-align:center">25.80</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>(DT: Diatomite; BC: Biochar).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-"></xref>Table 2. Toxicity experiments parameters.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">Experiment Identification</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="18.89%"><p style="text-align:center">Radiation</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="33.64%"><p style="text-align:center">Dilution Proportion</p><p style="text-align:center">(0.9% NaCl)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="22.48%"><p style="text-align:center">Temperature</p><p style="text-align:center">(˚C)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">1DT tox</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.89%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="33.64%"><p style="text-align:center">1:10</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="22.48%"><p style="text-align:center">23.00</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">2DT tox</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.89%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.64%"><p style="text-align:center">1:100</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.48%"><p style="text-align:center">21.00</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">3DT tox</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.89%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.64%"><p style="text-align:center">1:100</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.48%"><p style="text-align:center">21.00</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">1BC tox</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.89%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.64%"><p style="text-align:center">1:20</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.48%"><p style="text-align:center">24.10</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">2BC tox</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.89%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.64%"><p style="text-align:center">1:20</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.48%"><p style="text-align:center">22.50</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.00%"><p style="text-align:center">3BC tox</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.89%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.64%"><p style="text-align:center">1:20</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="22.48%"><p style="text-align:center">25.70</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>(DT: Diatomite; BC: Biochar).</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results and Discussion</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. TiO<sub>2</sub>-Diatomite Characterization</title>
    <p>The synthesized TiO<sub>2</sub>-diatomite material presented a final mass ranging from 2.5 g to 3 g. The results of the BET analysis revealed that pure diatomite has a surface area of 6.47 m<sup>2</sup>∙g<sup>−1</sup>, while the TiO<sub>2</sub>-Diatomite material exhibited a surface area of 216 m<sup>2</sup>∙g<sup>−1</sup>. This surface area is four times larger than commercially available TiO<sub>2</sub> for photocatalytic processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-1">
      Bianchi et al., 2015
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>The SEM micrograph revealed the structure of the synthesized material with uniformly sized and distributed pores, resembling the structure of diatomite. The pores exhibited diameters ranging from 2.5 to 3.8 µm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig-group id="fig1" position="float">
     <fig id="fig1" position="float">
      <label>Figure 1</label>
      <caption>
       <title>(a)--(b)--Figure 1. SEM micrograph of Diatomite (1 µm - (a)) and TiO2-Diatomite (30 µm - (b)).</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2172944-rId11.jpeg?20240809091155" />
     </fig>
     <fig id="fig1" position="float">
      <label>Figure 1</label>
      <caption>
       <title>(a)--(b)--Figure 1. SEM micrograph of Diatomite (1 µm - (a)) and TiO2-Diatomite (30 µm - (b)).</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2172944-rId12.jpeg?20240809091155" />
     </fig>
    </fig-group>
    <p>The thermogravimetric analysis indicated that the TiO<sub>2</sub>-Diatomite exhibited a stable structure. Throughout the observed temperature range, there was no significant mass loss (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 2. Thermogravimetric analysis (TG-DTA) of TiO<sub>2</sub>-Diatomite.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2172944-rId13.jpeg?20240809091156" />
    </fig>
    <p>The observed mass loss in the first analysis stage was the adsorbed or absorbed moisture from the material. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref> shows a weight decrease 19.69% when the temperature reaches 51.46˚C. Subsequently, the material exhibited a second mass loss stage decrease 5.506%, until 400˚C. This temperature represents the morphological change from the anatase crystalline phase to rutile (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-31">
      Zhu et al., 2018
     </xref>). After this stage, the material remained stable until the end of the analysis at 900˚C.</p>
    <p>The X-Ray Difratometry (XRD) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref>) indicated that the crystalline structure of the material corresponds with the anatase form which is the most suitable structure for photocatalysis. The diffractogram of the TiO<sub>2</sub>-Dt material showed diffraction peaks 2θ = 25.26; 37.88; 47.86; 54.06; 62.60; 68.90; 69.70; 75.00 and 82.50.</p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 3. X-ray diffraction pattern of the TiO<sub>2</sub>-Dt sample.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2172944-rId14.jpeg?20240809091156" />
    </fig>
    <p>In the literature, the description of peaks related to the Anatase form, under the angle of 2θ, are: 25.6; 37.6; 38.2; 48.3; 54.2; 55.6; 63.2; 70.7 and 75.7, indicated by the red dots in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-18">
      Najafidoust et al., 2020
     </xref>). By comparing the peaks obtained with the literature, it was possible to identify that the TiO<sub>2</sub> used is in the anatase phase.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. TiO<sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal Characterization</title>
    <p>The mass of TiO<sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal obtained during the synthesis was on average 2.8 grams. The surface area was measured by BET analysis and the result was 230 m<sup>2</sup>∙g<sup>−1</sup>, this indicates a high surface area due to the size of the particles and their porosity. The value is much higher than the commercial TiO<sub>2</sub> anatase which has a surface area between 45 - 55 m<sup>2</sup>∙g<sup>−1</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-22">
      Sigma-Aldrich, 2024
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>The SEM micrograph presented the TiO<sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
      Figure 4
     </xref>) enhanced surface area and microstructure obtained by biotemplate addition in the synthesis of the catalyst. The pores exhibited diameters ranging from 2.7 to 3.1 µm.</p>
    <p>The thermogravimetric analysis indicated that the TiO<sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal exhibited a stable structure. Analyzing the mass loss that stands at 19.75%, 13.23% is compatible with the presence of moisture and the loss of 6.60% is related to organic compounds that are part of the synthesis; it is observed that 80.15% of the tested material remained stable between the temperature range and 600˚C to 900˚C, therefore there was no thermal degradation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig-group id="fig4" position="float">
     <fig id="fig4" position="float">
      <label>Figure 4</label>
      <caption>
       <title>(a)--(b)--Figure 4. SEM micrograph of Biocharcoal (20 µm - (a)) and TiO2-Biocharcoal (10 µm - (b)).</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2172944-rId15.jpeg?20240809091156" />
     </fig>
     <fig id="fig4" position="float">
      <label>Figure 4</label>
      <caption>
       <title>(a)--(b)--Figure 4. SEM micrograph of Biocharcoal (20 µm - (a)) and TiO2-Biocharcoal (10 µm - (b)).</title>
      </caption>
      <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2172944-rId16.jpeg?20240809091156" />
     </fig>
    </fig-group>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 5. Thermogravimetric analysis (TG-DTA) of TiO<sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2172944-rId17.jpeg?20240809091156" />
    </fig>
    <p>The X-Ray Difratometry (XRD) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
      Figure 6
     </xref>) indicated that the crystalline structure of the material corresponds with the anatase form which is the most suitable structure for photocatalysis. The diffractogram of the TiO<sub>2</sub>-BC material showed diffraction peaks 2θ = 25.32; 37.88; 47.92; 54.04; 62.58; 68.80; 69.98; 74.94 and 82.66.</p>
    <fig id="fig6" position="float">
     <label>Figure 6</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 6. X-ray diffraction pattern of the TiO<sub>2</sub>-BC sample.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2172944-rId18.jpeg?20240809091156" />
    </fig>
    <p>The X-ray diffractometry was used to confirm the structure of TiO<sub>2</sub>-BC. In the literature, the description of peaks related to the Anatase form, under the angle of 2θ, are: 25.6; 37.6; 38.2; 48.3; 54.2; 55.6; 63.2; 70.7 and 75.7, indicated by the red dots in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
      Figure 6
     </xref> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-18">
      Najafidoust et al., 2020
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>As previously mentioned, there are 3 main crystalline structures presented by the oxide, with anatase being the one with the greatest photocatalytic activity. When analyzing the peaks under the 2Θ angle relating to the test compared to the anatase peaks in the literature, it is noted that they are coincident peaks.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Photodisinfection Kinetics</title>
    <p>All experiments exhibited a disinfection percentage above 96%. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">
      Figure 7
     </xref> shows the colonies on the Petri plates referring to the collections carried out at 0 minutes and 60 minutes of the 2DT experiment, with a total disinfection rate of 99.13%, demonstrating high bacterial inactivation during the process.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">
      Figure 8
     </xref> shows the colonies on the Petri plates referring to the collections carried out at 0 minutes and 60 minutes of the 3BC experiment, with a total disinfection rate of 98.88%, also demonstrating a high disinfection rate.</p>
    <p>Considering the high complexity of the disinfection processes, many references present empirical equations for the kinetic analysis of photocatalytic bacterial inactivation. The Chick-Watson equation (Equation (1)), a disinfection model published in 1908, offers a general expression for such analyses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-29">
      Watson, 1908
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig7" position="float">
     <label>Figure 7</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 7. Bacterial inactivation at each collection time (0 and 60 minutes) of the 2DT experiment using 0.5 g∙L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> of TiO<sub>2</sub>-Diatomite.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig7" position="float">
     <label>Figure 7</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 7. Bacterial inactivation at each collection time (0 and 60 minutes) of the 2DT experiment using 0.5 g∙L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> of TiO<sub>2</sub>-Diatomite.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2172944-rId19.jpeg?20240809091156" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig7" position="float">
     <label>Figure 7</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 7. Bacterial inactivation at each collection time (0 and 60 minutes) of the 2DT experiment using 0.5 g∙L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> of TiO<sub>2</sub>-Diatomite.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2172944-rId20.jpeg?20240809091156" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig8" position="float">
     <label>Figure 8</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 8. Bacterial inactivation at each collection time (0 and 60 minutes) of the 2BC experiment using 0.5 g∙L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> of TiO<sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig8" position="float">
     <label>Figure 8</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 8. Bacterial inactivation at each collection time (0 and 60 minutes) of the 2BC experiment using 0.5 g∙L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> of TiO<sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2172944-rId21.jpeg?20240809091157" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig8" position="float">
     <label>Figure 8</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 8. Bacterial inactivation at each collection time (0 and 60 minutes) of the 2BC experiment using 0.5 g∙L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> of TiO<sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2172944-rId22.jpeg?20240809091156" />
    </fig>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mi>
         L 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         o 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         g 
       </mi> 
       <mfrac> 
        <mi>
          C 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <msub> 
          <mi>
            C 
          </mi> 
          <mn>
            0 
          </mn> 
         </msub> 
        </mrow> 
       </mfrac> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mo>
         − 
       </mo> 
       <msup> 
        <mi>
          k 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          ′ 
        </mo> 
       </msup> 
       <mi>
         t 
       </mi> 
      </mrow> 
     </math>(1)</p>
    <p>where: C/C<sub>0</sub> is the reduction proportion in the bacterial concentration, k is the disinfection kinetic constant at time t.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-"></xref>Some authors attributed the initial delay in the process to a lag stage in the inactivation of the bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-5">
      Huesca-Espitia et al., 2017
     </xref>). The better representation of such an aspect is the delayed Chick-Watson model to fit the experimental results. This model includes a second parameter called t<sub>0</sub> that corresponds to the time of delay, according to Equation (2):</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mi>
         L 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         o 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         g 
       </mi> 
       <mfrac> 
        <mi>
          C 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <msub> 
          <mi>
            C 
          </mi> 
          <mn>
            0 
          </mn> 
         </msub> 
        </mrow> 
       </mfrac> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          { 
        </mo> 
        <mtable columnalign="left"> 
         <mtr> 
          <mtd> 
           <mn>
             0 
           </mn> 
           <mo>
             , 
           </mo> 
           <mi>
             t 
           </mi> 
           <mo>
             ≤ 
           </mo> 
           <msub> 
            <mi>
              t 
            </mi> 
            <mn>
              0 
            </mn> 
           </msub> 
          </mtd> 
         </mtr> 
         <mtr> 
          <mtd> 
           <mo>
             − 
           </mo> 
           <msup> 
            <mi>
              k 
            </mi> 
            <mo>
              ′ 
            </mo> 
           </msup> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              ( 
            </mo> 
            <mrow> 
             <mi>
               t 
             </mi> 
             <mo>
               − 
             </mo> 
             <msub> 
              <mi>
                t 
              </mi> 
              <mn>
                0 
              </mn> 
             </msub> 
            </mrow> 
            <mo>
              ) 
            </mo> 
           </mrow> 
           <mo>
             , 
           </mo> 
           <mi>
             t 
           </mi> 
           <mo>
             &gt; 
           </mo> 
           <msub> 
            <mi>
              t 
            </mi> 
            <mn>
              0 
            </mn> 
           </msub> 
          </mtd> 
         </mtr> 
        </mtable> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </math>(2)</p>
    <p>In 1972 the disinfection model proposed by Hom Equation (3) considered a bacterial inactivation with non-linear behavior (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-11">
      Hom, 1972
     </xref>):</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mi>
         L 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         o 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         g 
       </mi> 
       <mfrac> 
        <mi>
          C 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <msub> 
          <mi>
            C 
          </mi> 
          <mn>
            0 
          </mn> 
         </msub> 
        </mrow> 
       </mfrac> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mo>
         − 
       </mo> 
       <msup> 
        <mi>
          k 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          ′ 
        </mo> 
       </msup> 
       <msup> 
        <mi>
          t 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          m 
        </mi> 
       </msup> 
      </mrow> 
     </math>(3)</p>
    <p>The expression incorporates a second parameter called m. When m = 1, the equation reduces and simplifies to the Chick-Watson linear equation; for m &gt; 1, the Hom model reproduces the existence of a shoulder at the beginning of the reaction, whereas, for m &lt; 1 the equation permits the fitting of a tail at the end of the process. However, the model cannot reproduce the simultaneous existence of both regions.</p>
    <p>For the mathematical study of the kinetic models, the graphs were generated for each equation to determine the kinetic constant (k') of the Chick-Watson model and the parameter (m) of the Hom model. The experiments exposed to LED lamp radiation with TiO<sub>2</sub>-Diatomite (1DT, 2DT and 3DT) did not differ from those conducted with TiO<sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal (1BC, 2BC and 3BC). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">
      Figure 9
     </xref> shows correlated experiments with parameter m &lt; 1, confirming the presence of a tail in the kinetic graph curve.</p>
    <fig id="fig9" position="float">
     <label>Figure 9</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 9. Photodisinfection inactivation of greywater samples in the solar chamber with LED radiation using 0.5 g∙L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> TiO<sub>2</sub>-Diatomite (1DT, 2DT and 3DT) and 0.5 g∙L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> TiO<sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal (1BC, 2BC and 3 BC) and each correlated parameter m.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2172944-rId29.jpeg?20240809091156" />
    </fig>
    <p>Experiment 2DT exhibited the highest value of parameter m, indicating the presence of a well-defined shoulder at the beginning of the process (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">
      Figure 9
     </xref>—lilac). On the other hand, 3BC had a lower value of m, closer to 0 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">
      Figure 9
     </xref>—blue). Observing <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">
      Figure 9
     </xref> in red, there is a reduced shoulder at the beginning, and after 15 minutes, the process approximates the Chick-Watson Modified model with curvy kinetics. The demonstration of all kinetics constants and bacterial inactivation is in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-"></xref>Table 3. Photodisinfection inactivation percentage, kinetics constant (k'), and parameter m of greywater samples using 0.5 g∙L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> TiO<sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal (1BC, 2BC and 3 BC) 0.5 g∙L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> and TiO<sub>2</sub>-Diatomite (1DT, 2DT and 3DT).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="23.25%"><p style="text-align:center">Experiment identification</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="32.77%"><p style="text-align:center">k'</p><p style="text-align:center">(UFC∙mL<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>∙min<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.01%"><p style="text-align:center">m</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="23.97%"><p style="text-align:center">Bacterialinactivation(%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.25%"><p style="text-align:center">1BC</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="32.77%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.89977</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.01%"><p style="text-align:center">0.043</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.97%"><p style="text-align:center">100</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.25%"><p style="text-align:center">2BC</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="32.77%"><p style="text-align:center">−7.97522</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.01%"><p style="text-align:center">0.03501</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.97%"><p style="text-align:center">99.76</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.25%"><p style="text-align:center">3BC</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="32.77%"><p style="text-align:center">−4.49272</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.01%"><p style="text-align:center">0.00503</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.97%"><p style="text-align:center">98.88</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.25%"><p style="text-align:center">1DT</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="32.77%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.0445</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.01%"><p style="text-align:center">0.02331</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.97%"><p style="text-align:center">96.98</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.25%"><p style="text-align:center">2DT</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="32.77%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.0843</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.01%"><p style="text-align:center">1.4927</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.97%"><p style="text-align:center">99.13</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.25%"><p style="text-align:center">3DT</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="32.77%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.0512</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.01%"><p style="text-align:center">0.2593</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.97%"><p style="text-align:center">97.96</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135161-23">
      Sunada et al. (2003)
     </xref>, bacterial inactivation occurs due to the cumulative effects of successive attacks by reactive oxygen species (ROS) on the bacterial membrane and cell wall rather than a single attack. Thus, the length of the shoulder region in determining the kinetic inactivation curve is by the rate of ROS generation, influenced by the semiconductor concentration and irradiation flux.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. Toxicity Test</title>
    <p>Tests under no radiation demonstrated bacterial growth and stability during the process, indicating that the photocatalysts presented low toxicity for bacterial samples. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig10">
      Figure 10
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11">
      Figure 11
     </xref> confirm that the amount of bacterial colonies remained throughout the process. No significant bacterial inactivation was observed.</p>
    <fig id="fig10" position="float">
     <label>Figure 10</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 10. Toxicity test at each collection time (0 and 60 minutes) of the 1DT-tox experiment using 0.5 g∙L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> of TiO<sub>2</sub>-Diatomite.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig10" position="float">
     <label>Figure 10</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 10. Toxicity test at each collection time (0 and 60 minutes) of the 1DT-tox experiment using 0.5 g∙L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> of TiO<sub>2</sub>-Diatomite.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2172944-rId30.jpeg?20240809091157" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig10" position="float">
     <label>Figure 10</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 10. Toxicity test at each collection time (0 and 60 minutes) of the 1DT-tox experiment using 0.5 g∙L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> of TiO<sub>2</sub>-Diatomite.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2172944-rId31.jpeg?20240809091157" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig11" position="float">
     <label>Figure 11</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 11. Toxicity test at each collection time (0 and 60 minutes) of the 2BC-tox experiment using 0.5 g∙L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> of TiO<sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig11" position="float">
     <label>Figure 11</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 11. Toxicity test at each collection time (0 and 60 minutes) of the 2BC-tox experiment using 0.5 g∙L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> of TiO<sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2172944-rId32.jpeg?20240809091157" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig11" position="float">
     <label>Figure 11</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 11. Toxicity test at each collection time (0 and 60 minutes) of the 2BC-tox experiment using 0.5 g∙L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> of TiO<sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2172944-rId33.jpeg?20240809091157" />
    </fig>
    <p>The Colony-forming unit (CFU) per time for each experiment demonstrated similar behavior indicating a bacterial increase (1BC, 2BC, 3BC and 1DT) and stability (2DT, 3DT) during the process (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig12">
      Figure 12
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig12" position="float">
     <label>Figure 12</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 12. Colony-forming unit (CFU) per minute of greywater samples using 0.5 g∙L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> TiO<sub>2</sub>-Diatomite (1DT, 2DT and 3DT) and 0.5 g∙L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> TiO<sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal (1BC, 2BC and 3 BC) in the solar chamber in the dark (no radiation).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2172944-rId34.jpeg?20240809091157" />
    </fig>
    <p>The peak observed at minute 30 of the 1BC tox test refers to a big bacterial growth, then the graph shows a reduction and at the end of the process growth can be observed again. This is due to the fact that microorganisms do not behave in a predictable way, according to the environmental conditions and according to the composition of the sample used. Oscillations in the graph may occur, but the final result defines whether there was a decrease or increase in the number of bacteria colonies compared to the beginning of the process.</p>
    <p>No disinfection in the process was observed with the absence of light, confirming the ROS generation stimulated by radiation and a non-reactant material.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Conclusion</title>
   <p>The experiments conducted with wastewater samples yielded favorable results, with a significant decrease in bacterial colonies after 15 minutes of radiation exposure, resulting in bacterial inactivation above 96%.</p>
   <p>The kinetic studies correlated with the Hom model, exhibiting either a tail (assays 1BC, 3BC, 1DT, and 3DT) or a shoulder (2BC and 2DT) in the kinetic curve. In all experiments that displayed a tail, a decrease in the bacterial inactivation rate at the end of the photodisinfection process observed.</p>
   <p>The phenomenon of the tail in the kinetic curve is related to the increase in solution turbidity due to the presence of a high number of inactive bacteria at the beginning of the process (15 to 30 minutes), which reduces radiation incidence and, consequently, the production of hydroxyl radicals. Experiments demonstrating a shoulder in the curve indicate a delay in bacterial inactivation. This behavior is associated with the heterogeneity of the collected samples and the high concentration of microorganisms in the medium.</p>
   <p>The toxicity tests confirmed that the disinfection is unleashed by radiation. The low toxicity of the photocatalyst towards bacteria present in the rinse water was proven, as the results of tests in absolute darkness showed bacterial growth.</p>
   <p>The synthesized TiO<sub>2</sub>-Diatomite and TiO<sub>2</sub>-Biocharcoal materials demonstrated excellent properties as a photocatalytic disinfection agent in water samples contaminated with bacteria. This study enables the use of abundant renewable sources, such as solar energy in Brazil, for the disinfection of contaminated effluents, employing an accessible material with low toxicity and favorable kinetics.</p>
   <p>Further studies aim at identifying and correlating greywater pathogens with photodisinfection kinetics. Additionally, verify not only the purity of disinfected water but also understand the life-cycle of TiO<sub>2</sub> disposal in water bodies. The project proposal envisions the development of an autonomous photodisinfection system for remote areas, sourcing natural solar radiation and applying a material recycling procedure, overcoming economical and ecological obstacles for social and environmental impact.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>This study was financed by National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) processes 131260/2021-0 and 131268/2021-0.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bianchi, C. L., Pirola, C., Galli, F., Stucchi, M., Morandi, S., Cerrato, G. et al. (2015). Nano and Micro-TiO
     <sub>2</sub> for the Photodegradation of Ethanol: Experimental Data and Kinetic Modelling. RSC Advances, 5, 53419-53425. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra05385d
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Callewaert, C., Van Nevel, S., Kerckhof, F., Granitsiotis, M. S.,&amp;Boon, N. (2015). Bacterial Exchange in Household Washing Machines. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, Article 1381. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01381
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chen, Y., Wu, Q., Wang, J.,&amp;Song, Y. (2019). Retracted Article: Visible-Light-Driven Elimination of Oxytetracycline and Escherichia Coli Using Magnetic La-Doped TiO
     <sub>2</sub>/ Copper Ferrite/Diatomite Composite. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 26593-26604. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05873-w
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Coleman, H. M., Marquis, C. P., Scott, J. A., Chin, S. S.,&amp;Amal, R. (2005). Bactericidal Effects of Titanium Dioxide-Based Photocatalysts. Chemical Engineering Journal, 113, 55-63. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2005.07.015
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Huesca-Espitia, L. L. D. C., Aurioles-Lopez, V., Ramirez, I., Sánchez-Salas, J. L., Bandala, E. R. (2017). Photocatalytic Inactivation of Highly Resistant Microorganisms in Water: A Kinetic Approach. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 337, 132-139. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.01.025
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fawzi, T., Rani, S., Roy, S. C.,&amp;Lee, H. (2022). Photocatalytic Carbon Dioxide Conversion by Structurally and Materially Modified Titanium Dioxide Nanostructures. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23, Article 8143. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158143
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ganguly, P., Byrne, C., Breen, A.,&amp;Pillai, S. C. (2018). Antimicrobial Activity of Photocatalysts: Fundamentals, Mechanisms, Kinetics and Recent Advances. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 225, 51-75. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.11.018
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gattlen, J., Amberg, C., Zinn, M.,&amp;Mauclaire, L. (2010). Biofilms Isolated from Washing Machines from Three Continents and Their Tolerance to a Standard Detergent. Biofouling, 26, 873-882. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2010.524297
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Geissmann, Q. (2013). Opencfu, a New Free and Open-Source Software to Count Cell Colonies and Other Circular Objects. PLOS ONE, 8, e54072. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054072
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gopal, K., Tripathy, S. S., Bersillon, J. L.,&amp;Dubey, S. P. (2007). Chlorination Byproducts, Their Toxicodynamics and Removal from Drinking Water. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 140, 1-6. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.10.063
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hom, L. W. (1972). Kinetics of Chlorine Disinfection in an Ecosystem. Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division, 98, 183-194. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1061/jsedai.0001370
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2023). Synthesis Report of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6). &gt;https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/&gt; 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Levy, K., Smith, S. M.,&amp;Carlton, E. J. (2018). Climate Change Impacts on Waterborne Diseases: Moving toward Designing Interventions. Current Environmental Health Reports, 5, 272-282. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-018-0199-7
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Marugán, J., van Grieken, R., Pablos, C., Satuf, M. L., Cassano, A. E.,&amp;Alfano, O. M. (2011). Rigorous Kinetic Modelling with Explicit Radiation Absorption Effects of the Photocatalytic Inactivation of Bacteria in Water Using Suspended Titanium Dioxide. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 102, 404-416. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.12.012
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Marugán, J., van Grieken, R., Sordo, C.,&amp;Cruz, C. (2008). Kinetics of the Photocatalytic Disinfection of Escherichia coli Suspensions. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 82, 27-36. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.01.002
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Matsunaga, T., Tomoda, R., Nakajima, T.,&amp;Wake, H. (1985). Photoelectrochemical Sterilization of Microbial-Cells by Semiconductor Powders. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 29, 211-214.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mesones, S., Mena, E., López-Muñoz, M. J., Adán, C.,&amp;Marugán, J. (2020). Synergistic and Antagonistic Effects in the Photoelectrocatalytic Disinfection of Water with TiO
     <sub>2</sub> Supported on Activated Carbon as a Bipolar Electrode in a Novel 3D Photoelectrochemical Reactor. Separation and Purification Technology, 247, Article ID: 117002. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117002
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Najafidoust, A., Allahyari, S., Rahemi, N.,&amp;Tasbihi, M. (2020). Uniform Coating of TiO
     <sub>2</sub> Nanoparticles Using Biotemplates for Photocatalytic Wastewater Treatment. Ceramics International, 46, 4707-4719. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.10.202
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ortega-Gómez, E., Esteban García, B., Ballesteros Martín, M. M., Fernández Ibáñez, P.,&amp;Sánchez Pérez, J. A. (2013). Inactivation of Enterococcus Faecalis in Simulated Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent by Solar Photo-Fenton at Initial Neutral Ph. Catalysis Today, 209, 195-200. &gt;https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920586113000795 &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.03.001
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ortiz, N., Silva, A., Lima, G. N. S.,&amp;Hyppolito, F. P. (2018). Using Solar-TiO
     <sub>2</sub> and Biocarbon to Decompose and Adsorb Amoxicillin from Polluted Waters. International Journal of Chemistry, 10, Article 131. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5539/ijc.v10n1p131
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Shimizu, Y., Ateia, M., Wang, M., Awfa, D.,&amp;Yoshimura, C. (2019). Disinfection Mechanism of E. coli by CNT-TiO
     <sub>2</sub> Composites: Photocatalytic Inactivation vs. Physical Separation. Chemosphere, 235, 1041-1049. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.07.006
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sigma-Aldrich (2024). Product Specification. Titanium (IV) Dioxide, Anatase Nano-Powder. &gt;https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/specification-sheets/440/011/637254-BULK_______ALDRICH__.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sunada, K., Watanabe, T.,&amp;Hashimoto, K. (2003). Studies on Photokilling of Bacteria on TiO
     <sub>2</sub> Thin Film. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 156, 227-233. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-6030(02)00434-3
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tortora, G. J., Case, C. L.,&amp;Funke, B. R. (2016). Microbiology: An Introduction (12th ed.). Pearson.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Trazzi, P. A., Higa, A. R., Dieckow, J., Mangrich, A. S.,&amp;Higa, R. C. V. (2018). Biocarvão: Realidade e potencial de uso no meio florestal. Ciência Florestal, 28, 875-887. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509832128
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)&amp;World Health Organization (2021). Progress on Household Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene|2000-2020: Five Years into the SDGs.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     United Nations Development Group (UNDG) (2016). The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Are Coming. High Level Political Forum (HLPF).
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wang, S., Lian, J. S., Zheng, W. T.,&amp;Jiang, Q. (2012). Photocatalytic Property of Fe Doped Anatase and Rutile TiO
     <sub>2</sub> Nanocrystal Particles Prepared by Sol-Gel Technique. Applied Surface Science, 263, 260-265. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.09.040
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Watson, H. E. (1908). A Note on the Variation of the Rate of Disinfection with Change in the Concentration of the Disinfectant. Epidemiology and Infection, 8, 536-542. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022172400015928
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wu, Y., Li, X., Yang, Q., Wang, D., Xu, Q., Yao, F. et al. (2019). Hydrated Lanthanum Oxide-Modified Diatomite as Highly Efficient Adsorbent for Low-Concentration Phosphate Removal from Secondary Effluents. Journal of Environmental Management, 231, 370-379. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.059
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135161-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhu, X., Han, S., Feng, W., Kong, Q., Dong, Z., Wang, C. et al. (2018). The Effect of Heat Treatment on the Anatase-Rutile Phase Transformation and Photocatalytic Activity of Sn-Doped TiO
     <sub>2</sub> Nanomaterials. RSC Advances, 8, 14249-14257. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ra00766g
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>