<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojapps
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Open Journal of Applied Sciences
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2165-3917
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2165-3925
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ojapps.2024.148129
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojapps-135090
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Biomedical 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Life Sciences, Chemistry 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Materials Science, Computer Science 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Communications, Engineering, Physics 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Mathematics
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Can the Hypothetical Protons Emitted by the Shroud’s Man Furnish an I(z) Correlation?
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Giovanni
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Fazio
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="affnull">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Physical Sciences and Earth Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     01
    </day> 
    <month>
     08
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    14
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    08
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    1979
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    1984
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      13,
     </day>
     <month>
      June
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      2,
     </day>
     <month>
      June
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      2,
     </day>
     <month>
      August
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    Recently, we have investigated the hypothesis radiative demonstrating that the two penetrated thicknesses (in air and linen) are not compatible with a single energy of the protons. Furthermore, we deduced that the distribution of energy, released by the above particles, on the burial linen has not a linear trend when the body-burial linen distance changes. Now, in this article we want to deduce the I(z) relationship, between the Image Intensity of the colour produced by protons on a linen and the z distance from the source (of Protons) and the same linen. To achieve the result in an analytical form and make a comparison with the same function extracted from the Shroud, we used the empirical expression Range-Energy for protons in air of Wilson-Brobeck. Thus, we obtain a result I(z) = I
    <sub>m</sub> [1 − (z/R)
    <sup>5/9</sup>] that is different from the one extracted from the Turin Linen I(z) = I
    <sub>M</sub> (1 − z/R
    <sub>0</sub>). We have also the same information using the Range-Energy curves for protons of Rogozinski. The result is negative for the radiative hypothesis that is unable to produce the Shroud Body Image. Therefore, to investigate the above unknown process of formation, it is necessary to think about another one.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Hypothesis Radiative
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Protons in the Matter
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Energy Lost by Protons
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      I(z) Correlations
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Comparison
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>The Shroud of Turin is the most studied archaeological find in the world. People have been waiting for an answer for decades about the distribution of the yellowed fibrils and the mechanism that produces them. In fact, it is the above distribution that forms the Body Image, as we see it on the Shroud of Turin, with his 2D characteristic <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135090-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. In fact, the Shroud Image appears with inverted, colours and left with right. Exactly like a photographic negative. Before and after, other discoveries have been made and, in 1982, a new characteristic, the 3D has been added to 2D <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135090-2">
     [2]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135090-3">
     [3]
    </xref>. These two characteristics are the ones that give charm to the Shroud.</p>
   <p>In 1985, observing and analysing the results that come from the research on the Shroud, the scientist Lukasik deduced that a Photochemical Reaction would be the appropriate process to obtain an Image as the one presented on the Burial Linen of Turin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135090-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. In other words, the emission of an electromagnetic radiation of opportune wavelength (and hence energy) should cause the above Reaction in the surface of the linen fibrils. Thus, some scientists have considered radiations in the far ultraviolet region (for example <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135090-5">
     [5]
    </xref>), others have looked nuclear particles such as protons (for example <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135090-6">
     [6]
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>The protons are subatomic particles with mass m<sub>P</sub> = 1.672 × 10<sup>−27</sup> Kg, radius r<sub>p</sub> = 10<sup>−15</sup> m = 1 fm and a positive electrical charge e<sup>+</sup> = 1.602 × 10<sup>−19</sup> C. These particles are present in nuclei. In a nucleus the number of protons is equal to the Atomic Number Z that characterizes each element present on Earth: in the natural ones Z varies from 1 (Hydrogen, H) to 92 (Uranium, U); in those produced artificially by Nuclear Reactions, the Atomic Number Z varies from 93 (Neptunio, Np) to 118 (Oganesson, Og). Beyond, there are only theoretical hypotheses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135090-7">
     [7]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135090-8">
     [8]
    </xref>. These particles when penetrate the matter, due to the Coulomb Forces, have elastic and inelastic interactions with electrons and nuclei (with a cross section for electron greater than the one for nuclei). The effects are excitation, ionization, scattering, radiative losses and other possible nuclear processes. Despite the complexity of these processes, to affirm that the protons cross the matter ionizing the atoms is acceptable <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135090-9">
     [9]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135090-11">
     [11]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Now, it is necessary to consider that the protons, with ionization, take electrons away from the nuclei oxidizing the matter. In our case, at macroscopic level, the linen turns yellow. With these characteristics some scholars have thought that the protons, emitted from the body of the Nazarene, still wrapped in his burial linen in the Tomb, could be considered the source of energy in the formation of the Shroud Body Image.</p>
   <p>The formation mechanism of the above Image is the goal of the research on the Linen of Turin. In fact, for several decades researchers and scientists have been working to achieve the desired result. Unfortunately, the obtained hypotheses, between theoretical studies and experiments, are a lot and can be divided into three groups: false mechanisms, Miracles and natural events. With this state of affairs and taking also into account that exists, and it is always present, a conflict of religious interests, the comparison becomes a clash among the different proposed mechanisms of the Body Image formation. Today, there is only confusion. We think that a true comparison of the ideas performed among various scientists is impossible.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. I(z) Correlation Produced by Protons</title>
   <p>In the years 1982/1984, Jackson et al. have extracted from the Shroud of Turin 13 pairs of values of Image Intensity I with the respective distance corpse-burial linen z in well-known points of the Image (points where the above distance had already been evaluated). The measures of Intensity of Image have been performed, using a microdensitometer, by Vernon Miller of the Brooks Institute of Photography, Santa Barbara, California <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135090-2">
     [2]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135090-3">
     [3]
    </xref>. These pairs of values represented in an (I − z) plane appeared quite scattered. However, the fitting procedure provided a result: the I(z) Correlation for the Shroud Body Image, that was aligned best with the data, was a straight line, decreasing as z increased (a line with negative constant slope, dI/dz = −I<sub>M</sub>/R<sub>0</sub>). In an analytical form, we can write it as follows:</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        I 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         I 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         M 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mi>
           z 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           / 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             R 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             0 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>(1)</p>
   <p>where I(z) is the Image Intensity (or the Yellowed Fibrils Density) at a z distance, I<sub>M</sub> is the maximum value of Intensity present only in the contact areas (where R<sub>0</sub> = 0) and R<sub>0</sub> is the distance corpse-burial linen z that makes I(R<sub>0</sub>) = 0. The distance corpse-linen z ranges between 0 and R<sub>0</sub>. This last one represents the Discoloration Effects Range.</p>
   <p>Unfortunately, we do not know with certain what kind of energy was involved in the formation mechanism that produced the Shroud Body Image. Today again, the choice of the radiative hypothesis prevails among the scientists. In fact, many are the supporters who accept the idea of a body (the corpse of the Nazarene) able to emit electromagnetic radiations in the far ultraviolet region (close to X-ray) or nuclear particles as the protons. On the contrary, we think that the only source of energy present, for a short time, in an ancient Sepulcher, is thermal energy.</p>
   <p>We have always been against these hypotheses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135090-12">
     [12]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135090-13">
     [13]
    </xref> which smacks of the miraculous, and Physics with Theology do not agree with them. For Rogers, an authoritative chemical scientist and STURP member, the above radiative processes are pseudoscience <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135090-14">
     [14]
    </xref>. Also, we believe in a natural process: the Stochastic one <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135090-15">
     [15]
    </xref>. Therefore we want to see when the hypothetical emitted protons reach the Burial Linen leaving their kinetic energy, what kind of I(z) Correlation there will be. To obtain this result, with an acceptable reliability, at first, we will use the empirical formula Range-Energy for protons in air of Wilson and Bobreck: R(E<sub>p</sub>) = (E<sub>p</sub>/9.3)<sup>1.8</sup>. This expression, where the energy is measured in MeV and the air distance in meter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135090-16">
     [16]
    </xref>, it has already been used in one of our article <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135090-17">
     [17]
    </xref>, because furnishes acceptable different values from those obtained using the Bethe calculation. So, we can write:</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         E 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         p 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        9.3 
      </mn> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mn>
           5 
         </mn> 
         <mo>
           / 
         </mo> 
         <mn>
           9 
         </mn> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>(2)</p>
   <p>where E<sub>p</sub>(z) is the energy that the protons lose to cross a space z in air. The corpse-burial linen distance z ranges between 0 and R. Now, it is evident that the energy transferred to the linen at a z distance, to make it yellow, is the difference between the one of emission E<sub>m</sub> and the lost one through the thickness of air equal to z:</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         E 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         p 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         E 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         m 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        9.3 
      </mn> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mn>
           5 
         </mn> 
         <mo>
           / 
         </mo> 
         <mn>
           9 
         </mn> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>(3)</p>
   <p>The I(z) Image Intensity (or the Yellowed Fibril Density) is proportional to the energy that the protons, after passing through the air, transfer to the linen: I(z) = C × E<sub>m</sub> − C × 9.3 × z<sup>5/9</sup>, where C is a constant. Therefore, the Intensity of Image, also considering that we want the distance z expressed in mm, can be written as: I(z) = I<sub>m</sub> − C × 9.3 × 10<sup>−15/9</sup> × z<sup>5/9</sup>. Here, when z = R, the Intensity of Image becomes I(R) = 0 and we deduce I<sub>m</sub> = C × 9.3 × 10<sup>−15/9</sup> × R<sup>5/9</sup> Therefore, the I(z) Correlation produced by using protons, emitted from the corpse of the Man of the Shroud, with kinetic energy E<sub>m</sub> can be written:</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        I 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         z 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         I 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         m 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         [ 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <msup> 
         <mrow> 
          <mrow> 
           <mo>
             ( 
           </mo> 
           <mrow> 
            <mrow> 
             <mi>
               z 
             </mi> 
             <mo>
               / 
             </mo> 
             <mi>
               R 
             </mi> 
            </mrow> 
           </mrow> 
           <mo>
             ) 
           </mo> 
          </mrow> 
         </mrow> 
         <mrow> 
          <mrow> 
           <mn>
             5 
           </mn> 
           <mo>
             / 
           </mo> 
           <mn>
             9 
           </mn> 
          </mrow> 
         </mrow> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ] 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>(4)</p>
   <p>Also, without a graphic representation, we can see the Correlation produced by the protons is different from the one extracted from the Shroud of Turin. We think that the I<sub>m</sub> and R values, in general, are different from I<sub>M</sub> and R<sub>0</sub>, respectively. The trend of the (4) is not the one of a linear regression and has a slope dI(z)/dz = −(5 I<sub>m</sub>/9 R<sup>5/9</sup>) × z<sup>−4/9</sup>. This is a very important result of our work: the slope is not constant. The Image Intensity ranges between I = I<sub>m</sub> (when z = 0) and I = 0 (when z = R). This last distance, which we do not know, represents the Discoloration Effects Range when the source, to obtain a colouring on a linen, is of protons. However, the radiative hypothesis to be accepted it should produce a distribution of Image Intensity values and a Discoloration Effects Range equal to the ones deduced of the Shroud of Turin.</p>
   <p>After the measurements of Image Intensity in 13 points and a fitting procedure made by Jackson et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135090-2">
     [2]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135090-3">
     [3]
    </xref>, we have accepted the values R<sub>0</sub> = 37 mm, as best as possible given the scattered of the measured data. This value is an important characteristic of the Shroud of Turin and it has been obtained experimentally. Therefore, we look at the function (4) inserting both the value of R<sub>0</sub> in place of R and the one of I<sub>M</sub> in place of I<sub>m</sub>: I(z) = I<sub>M</sub> [1 − (z/R<sub>0</sub>)<sup>5/9</sup>].</p>
   <p>Subsequently, we also used the Rogozinski formula that describes the Range-Energy curves for protons <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135090-18">
     [18]
    </xref>. In this formula R(E<sub>p</sub>) = a<sup>−1.8</sup> × (E<sub>p</sub>)<sup>1.8</sup> the protons energy is measured in MeV and R(E<sub>p</sub>), the depth penetration in matter, in g/cm<sup>2</sup>. The matter is characterized by “a” parameter; in the air its value is equal to 29. The penetration depth is measured in g/cm<sup>2</sup>. The ratio between this value and the density of the crossed matter expressed in g/cm<sup>3</sup> furnishes the value of R in centimeters. The use of this formula to obtain the above Correlation in the case of protons has furnished the same result of the Wilson-Bobreck formula.</p>
   <p>Thus, only observing the two functions (1) and (4), it is natural not to consider the radiative process as a possible formation mechanism of the Shroud Body Image.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Conclusions</title>
   <p>After what was written in “I(z) Correlation produced by Protons”, it is necessary to underline that the radiative model has many other problems. Some of these are insurmountable:</p>
   <p>1) The emission, in this case of protons, from the corpse of the Nazarene when it was still wrapped in his burial linen placed in the Sepulcher.</p>
   <p>2) These particles, as happens also with the electromagnetic radiations, are unable to distinguish the fibrils that must be affected to form the Shroud Body Image from those that must maintain the background optical density (as the one of the fibrils that are outside the Image).</p>
   <p>3) The yellowed fibrils, those that formed the Body Image on the Shroud, they should have the same optical density.</p>
   <p>4) The resolution of coloration obtained by radiative process, it should be the same of the one of the Body Image.</p>
   <p>5) Both, Physics and Theology, are contrary to the radiative hypotheses because they cannot accept the above emissions from a corpse or a body. An emission of this nature has never been seen in the History of Humanity.</p>
   <p>6) When the kinetic energy of the protons is able to penetrate the linen only for 200 nm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135090-19">
     [19]
    </xref>, at same time, it is unable to reach the Discoloration Effects Range Value in air that is 3.7 cm. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135090-2">
     [2]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135090-3">
     [3]
    </xref>. In this case, we may not have complete colour because some areas may not be reached by the protons.</p>
   <p>This article is made to demonstrate to the people that the above miraculous hypothesis is not supported by common sense, by Physics and Theology. We do not know how much this sentence is worth and how it will be considered. For us it is the Truth, therefore, we underline it.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>The author remembers his friend Giovanni Sturniolo Villa (1943-2020) for the long discussions about the Shroud of Turin; particularly those on the formation mechanism of the Shroud Body Image. He, with his determination, is always present when I write about the Linen of Turin.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.135090-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Boschiero, G. (1998) Secondo Pia Fotografo della Sindone. Editore Comune di Asti, Asti. (Italian Language)
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135090-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jackson, J.P., Jumper E.J. and Ercoline, R.W. (1982) Three Dimensional Characteristic of the Shroud Image. IEEE 1982 Proceedings International Conference on Cybernetics and Society, Seattle, 28-30 October 1982, 559-575.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135090-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jackson, J.P., Jumper, E.J. and Ercoline, W.R. (1984) Correlation of Image Intensity on the Turin Shroud with the 3-D Structure of a Human Body Shape. Applied Optics, 23, 2244-2270. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.23.002244
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135090-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lukasik, S.J. (1985) Some Speculations Concerning the Process Leading to the Formation of the Image on the Shroud of Turin. &gt;https://shroud.com/pdfs/lukasik1985.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135090-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Di Lazzaro, P., Murra, D., Nichelatti, E., Santoni, A. and Baldacchini, G. (2012) Superficial and Shroud-Like Coloration of Linen by Short Laser Pulses in the Vacuum Ultraviolet. Applied Optics, 51, 8567-8578. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.51.008567
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135090-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Antonacci, M. (2012) Particle Radiation from the Body Could Explain the Shroud’s Images and Its Carbon Dating. Scientific Research and Essays, 7, 2613-2626. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5897/sre12.376
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135090-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fazio, G., Giardina, G., Mandaglio, G., Ruggeri, R., Muminov, A.I., Nasirov, A.K., et al. (2005) Strong Influence of the Entrance Channel on the Formation of Compound Nuclei Th 216, 222*and Their Evaporation Residues. Physical Review C, 72, Article ID: 064614. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.72.064614
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135090-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Giardina, G., Mandaglio, G., Nasirov, A.K., Anastasi, A., Curciarello, F. and Fazio, G. (2018) Uncertainties and Understanding of Experimental and Theoretical Results Regarding Reactions Forming Heavy and Superheavy Nuclei. Nuclear Physics A, 970, 169-207. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2017.11.010
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135090-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Meyerohf, W.E. (1967) Elements of Nuclear Physics. Mc-Graw-Hill Inc.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135090-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Evans, R.D. (1955) The Atomic Nucleus. Mc-Graw-Hill Inc.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135090-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Moe, H.J., Lusak, S.R. and Schumaker, M.C. (1971) Radiation Safety Technicians Training Course Argonne National Laboratory. Industrial Hygiene and Safety Division.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135090-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fazio, G. (2022) The Body Image on the Shroud Was Not Produced by Protons. Scientific Culture, 8, 17-21.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135090-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fazio, G. (2022a) Could the VUV Radiation Yield the Shroud Body Image? Global Journal of Archaeology&amp;Anthropology, 12, 1-3.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135090-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rogers, R.N. and Arnoldi, A. (2002) Scientific Method Applied to the Shroud of Turin: A Review. &gt;https://shroud.com/pdfs/rogers2.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135090-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fazio, G., Mandaglio, G. and Anastasi, A. (2018) Describing, Step by Step, the Shroud Body Image Formation. Heritage, 2, 34-38. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage2010003
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135090-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wilson, R.R. (1947) Range, Straggling, and Multiple Scattering of Fast Protons. Physical Review, 71, 385-386. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.71.385
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135090-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fazio, G. (2023) Discoloration Range and Shroud Image Depth Values Cannot Be Satisfied by the Same Proton Energy. Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 13, 1224-1232. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2023.138096
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135090-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rogozinski, A. (1951) Sur quelques relations approchées entre l’énergie, l’ionisation spécifique et le parcours d’une particule de grande énergie. Journal de Physique et le Radium, 12, 955-956. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1051/jphysrad:019510012010095501
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135090-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fanti, G., Botella, J., Di Lazzaro, P., Heimburger, T., Schneider, R. and Svensson, N. (2010) Microscopic and Macroscopic Characteristics of the Shroud of Turin Image Superficiality. Journal of Imaging Science and Technology, 54, 40201-1-40201-8. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2352/j.imagingsci.technol.2010.54.4.040201
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>