<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ajibm
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     American Journal of Industrial and Business Management
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2164-5167
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2164-5175
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ajibm.2024.147051
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ajibm-135040
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Business 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Economics
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Impact of Road Transportation Network Infrastructure on Regional Development in Kenya
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Alfred
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Eshitera
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Lawrence
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Esho
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Casty Gatakaa
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Njoroge
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="affnull">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Spatial Planning and Design, Technical University of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     29
    </day> 
    <month>
     07
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    14
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    07
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    992
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    1011
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      5,
     </day>
     <month>
      June
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      28,
     </day>
     <month>
      June
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      28,
     </day>
     <month>
      July
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    In this study we review literature related to impacts of road transport infrastructure on regional development. We identify the indicators used to measure regional development from existing literature and further correlate it with road network concentration. Spatial metrics have been used to assess the correlation of road infrastructure network and regional development indicators which is further informed with economic models, spatial location theories and the Tobler’s first law of geography. From the study, there is a positive correlation between regional development and road transport infrastructure indicators with an R
    <sup>2</sup> of 0.35. The selected indicators are County Domestic Product (CDP) and Kernel Density (KD) has been used to assess the clustering of road network in various regions hence generating a heat map. Moran’s I has been used to calculate the likelihood of spillover effect of the road transport infrastructure network. Central Kenya has been identified to have high concentration of network and has possible spillover effect when it comes to development. This study contributes to regional science theory by applying integrated approach where both econometric and locational models have been used to understand Kenya road transport network and its implication to regional development patterns.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Road Transport Infrastructure
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Regional Development Indicators
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Spatial Metrics
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Transportation is regarded as the main driver of civilization. It takes the power of transportation to connect billions of people across various continents. From the early stages of civilization, speed and strength of mode of transport used was supreme in the hunt and battle fields. Consequently, centers of empires would be held together as they could be easily accessed by the rulers together with their army while protecting their territories. The forms of movement changed over time from the horse, the wheel, steam power to jet engine. Transportation has therefore become exoskeleton of regional development by allowing flow of goods and services (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-44">
     Siliva, 2017
    </xref>). In developed economies investment in the transport sector and improved technology over the last century has stimulated regional growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-6">
     Berg, Deichmann, Liu, &amp; Harris, 2015
    </xref>). On the other hand, developing countries have recorded disparities in transport sector investment leading to inequality in regional development. In such countries there are governance gaps which does not permit sustainable models for financing public infrastructure including roads (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-48">
     Stern School of Business and New York University, 2016
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>The early and the first attempt to document the role of transport in regional development was acknowledged by Von Thunen in his book Isolated State in the year 1826 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-40">
     Ramesh, Luca, &amp; Marco, 2023
    </xref>) and (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-25">
     Mackinnon &amp; Docherty, 2013
    </xref>). Other theories that are built on transport systems include Alfred Weber industrial location model, Walter Christeller on central places, 1933 Losch Model, 1954, Alonzo bid rent, 1960 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-10">
     Capello, 2011
    </xref>). Several studies on regional science, urban economics, economic geography and urban studies as documented by (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-41">
     Rodrigue &amp; Ducruet, 2020
    </xref>) have extensively studied transportation systems. Despite several studies directly dealing with this topic the relationship between transport and regional development presents a gap which needs to be studied especially at the national level of developing countries. In rural areas roads are the foundation of physical infrastructure which provide cheap access (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-20">
     Jacoby, 2000
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>Available modes of transportation include water, air, rail and road. Road transportation has an advantage over other modes of transport due to its flexibility which can offer door to door service as it covers 42% of global mobility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-51">
     Tini, Shah, &amp; Sultan, 2018
    </xref>). These modes of transport have accelerated regional development in recent centuries by linking regions and centers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-29">
     Michniak, 2015
    </xref>). Roads provides cheap access to markets in rural areas allowing distribution of farm produce to urban areas in exchange for inputs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-20">
     Jacoby, 2000
    </xref>). In addition, well connected rural areas are resilient to natural shocks, empowered, socially integrated and they have a reliable supply chain of food and farm inputs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-50">
     Thynell, 2017
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>Despite the fact that most developing countries spend huge percentage on roads sector, little is known about the benefits of such investment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-20">
     Jacoby, 2000
    </xref>). In Kenya the 2023/2024 gross budget estimates indicates 22.7% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-53">
     Treasury, 2023
    </xref>) was allocated to the Ministry of transport where the raod sector is domiciled. The objective of this article is to identify indicators of regional development and gauge their performance in relation to road transport infrastructure in the Kenyan context. Research questions answered includes; which region of the country has the most improved/coverage of road transport infrastructure? What are the indicators of regional development as covered in existing literature? What is the relationship between road infrastructure coverage and regional development indicators? Additionally, studies correlating road network infrastructure and regional development are still elusive in Kenya. Therefore, impact of road transport infrastructure on regional development is good hypothesis to test.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Conceptual Issues: Road Transport Infrastructure and National Development</title>
   <p>There are four main modes of transport that is road, air, maritime and rail. Road transport which is the subject of this study is composed of the following sub modes; walking, animal carriages and automobiles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-49">
     Tchanche, 2019
    </xref>). The concept of road infrastructure therefore includes all basic facilities and governance structures required for proper functioning of national or a region’s economy. Road transport has become key element of physical infrastructure that creates conducive environment for thriving national socio-economic development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-5">
     Bekisz &amp; Kruszynski, 2021
    </xref>). Regional planners advocate for a system that will support economic growth and welfare advancement of the entire community (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-4">
     Bandyopadhyay &amp; Datta, 1989
    </xref>). The role of transport infrastructure in national development arena is determined by the services it provides. An improvement on road transport infrastructure reduces transport cost which is a major factor in production and distribution chain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-2">
     Arbues, Banos, &amp; Mayor, 2015
    </xref>). Therefore, national development must include both growth and distributive justice which is a constitutional requirement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-16">
     Government of Kenya, 2010
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>Existing literature on the impact of transport policies and investment have a varied outcome at different spatial levels. An increase in productivity is a positive indicator of welfare of individuals and is a reflection of the impact of road infrastructure investment in a region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-6">
     Berg, Deichmann, Liu, &amp; Harris, 2015
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>Theoretically, the role of transport and its relation to development can be linked to regional economic models. The first work to be published in relation to locational models was done in 1806 by Von Thunen in his book Isolated State as expounded by (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-38">
     Pokharel, Bertolini, &amp; Brommelstroet, 2023
    </xref>). Another location model linking transport and development is the work of Alfred weber where the cost of transportation plays a big role in locating a firm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-41">
     Rodrigue &amp; Ducruet, 2020
    </xref>).</p>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. The Impact of Transportation Network on National Development</title>
    <p>Roads are predominantly used as mode of transport and form a strategic element for National development. Sub-Saharan African countries for example Ghana has invested in road transport infrastructure as it is a policy measure meant to revitalize regional growth and poverty reduction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-9">
      Boateng &amp; Fricano, Adarkwa, 2015
     </xref>). Both pre and post-independence Kenya national development policies have emphasized on the need of investing in the transportation sector. The colonial policy commonly known as the Swynnerton plan (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-31">
      Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources, 1955
     </xref>) recommended investment in road sector in highlands zones mainly in central and rift valley regions which were occupied by white settlers. The settlers were mainly farmers and this policy strategy was seen as a measure of stimulating growth specifically in agriculture sector as it was the main economic activity. The first post-independence policy paper supported heavy investment on road network improvement viewed as a means a means of improving market access for most perishable goods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-15">
      Government of Kenya, 1965
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>It is therefore imperative that there is clear link between road transport network distribution and regional growth. Road network provide good access which is the ability of citizens to interact freely with little or no friction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-17">
      Hassan, Wang, Khoo, &amp; Foliente, 2017
     </xref>). The impact can be all economic, social or political. Economically good, reliable and affordable road transport network allows smooth flow of goods and services conveniently hence improving development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-7">
      Berg, Deichmann, Liu, &amp; Selod, 2016
     </xref>). Socially the networks allow communities and citizens in general to move around the space and interact while creating social bonds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-50">
      Thynell, 2017
     </xref>). In the field of regional science road transport network are viewed as a means of improving spatial organization where activities are linked to each other (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-41">
      Rodrigue &amp; Ducruet, 2020
     </xref>).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. National Development</title>
    <p>Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is widely used as a measure of national development. In this study we adopt (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-13">
      Frank, Bernanke, Osberg, Cross, &amp; Macleen, 2003
     </xref>) definition of GDP which is the value of final goods and services produced by a country or region over a period of time which is mostly calculated by a given state on annual basis. The macroeconomic model used to calculate GDP is indicated in formula Equation 1 which is adopted from (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-27">
      Mankiw, Kneebone, McKenzie, &amp; Rowe, 2006
     </xref>)</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-"></xref>Equation 1: Gross Domestic Product Model</p>
    <p>
     <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mi>
         Y 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         C 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         I 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         G 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ( 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mi>
           e 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           − 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           i 
         </mi> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ) 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </math></p>
    <p>Where Y = Gross Domestic Product</p>
    <p>C = Consumption (expenditure goods and services)</p>
    <p>I = Investment (expenditure on assets)</p>
    <p>G = Governmnet Purchases</p>
    <p>
     <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          ( 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mi>
           e 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           − 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           i 
         </mi> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ) 
        </mo> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </math> = netexport</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-"></xref>In an empirical study using data from Russian Statistical Agency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-43">
      Sergei, Mikail, &amp; Kudrov, 2018
     </xref>) identifies parameters used to calculate Gross Regional Product (GRP). The identified parameters are incomes from key production sectors <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>. These sectors are similar to the ones used to calculate Kenya’s Gross County product (GCP) which is an estimate of the size and structure of the forty-seven (47) county economies. GCP is what is international known as Gross Regional Product (GRP) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-22">
      KNBS, 2022
     </xref>) which is international used indicator of growth.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-"></xref>Table 1. Sectors of economy, source: (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-22">
        KNBS, 2022
       </xref>).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="33.30%"><p style="text-align:center">Agriculture, Forestry, fishing</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="30.32%"><p style="text-align:center">Manufacturing</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="36.38%"><p style="text-align:center">Mining and quarrying</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="33.30%"><p style="text-align:center">Water supply, waste collection</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="30.32%"><p style="text-align:center">Services, Education</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="36.38%"><p style="text-align:center">Electricity and supply</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.30%"><p style="text-align:center">Repair of motor vehicle</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.32%"><p style="text-align:center">Wholesale and retail trade</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.38%"><p style="text-align:center">Construction</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.30%"><p style="text-align:center">Administration support activities</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.32%"><p style="text-align:center">Transport and storage</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.38%"><p style="text-align:center">Accommodation, food sales</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.30%"><p style="text-align:center">Professional, technical activities</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.32%"><p style="text-align:center">Real estate activities</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.38%"><p style="text-align:center">Financial and insurance activities</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.30%"><p style="text-align:center">Public administration, defense</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.32%"><p style="text-align:center">Human health, social work</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.38%"><p style="text-align:center">Information and communication</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Both (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-27">
      Mankiw, Kneebone, McKenzie, &amp; Rowe, 2006
     </xref>) and (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-13">
      Frank, Bernanke, Osberg, Cross, &amp; Macleen, 2003
     </xref>) suggest that GDP is a good single measure of economic wellbeing of any society and is strongly correlated with the measure of quality of life. The GDP approach has a circular flow <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref> as adopted from (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-39">
      Ragan &amp; Lipsey, 2008
     </xref>). The flow indicates circulation of money which includes expenditure and income from all sectors of economy both government, households and private firms.</p>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 1. Circular flow of expenditure and income (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-39">
        Ragan &amp; Lipsey, 2008
       </xref>).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2123313-rId16.jpeg?20240731042416" />
    </fig>
    <p>First we start by defining a region in the context of this study. We adopt (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-43">
      Sergei, Mikail, &amp; Kudrov, 2018
     </xref>) definition of a region which is a homogenous geographic area which has similar production factors. Regional economies which are used to measure the level of growth are quantified using Gross Regional Product (GRP) which is GDP at a lower level. In some countries for example India they use states and districts as planning regions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-36">
      Ohlan, 2012
     </xref>) and (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-23">
      Kurian, 2000
     </xref>). In Kenya counties are used as regions where planning and implementation of development projects is mainly done. Kenya therefore has forty-seven (47) devolved planning regions in the name of counties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-16">
      Government of Kenya, 2010
     </xref>). The devolved units are meant to promote development and equitable sharing of national resources. The calculation of GRP is important since it used to assess revenue potential and used as an indicator of development progress over time (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-22">
      KNBS, 2022
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>In conclusion, development can be explained using regional macroeconomics models which incorporates dimension of space into analysis. Theoretical inputs of regional development are based on macroeconomics, trade theory which are expressed by mathematical formulae (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-10">
      Capello, 2011
     </xref>) as shown in Equation 1. The concept of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is includes spending on all production sectors of a region ranging from mining, agriculture and service industry is a good denominator of regional development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-1">
      Aivazian, Afanasiev, &amp; Kudrov, 2018
     </xref>). In this study the adoption of GCP which is GDP at the County level as an indicator was selected because the formulae used to calculate it is inclusive incorporating all sectors of development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-22">
      KNBS, 2022
     </xref>), (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-23">
      Kurian, 2000
     </xref>). Using GDP to assess the impact of road infrastructure network investment which is evidenced in the network expansion is an approach which is well supported by several empirical studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-54">
      Whittle, 2009
     </xref>), (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-34">
      Nigohosyan &amp; Vutsova, 2017
     </xref>), (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-1">
      Aivazian, Afanasiev, &amp; Kudrov, 2018
     </xref>). Supportive road infrastructure investment policy framework improves competiveness of a region by making it a locational choice. A negative loop is an outcome of unsupportive policy framework (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 2. Conceptual framework indicating spill over impact of road infrastructure policy, Source researcher construct.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2123313-rId17.jpeg?20240731042417" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Methodology</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Review of Existing Literature</title>
    <p>Existing literature was selected specifically in studies where road transport was treated as an independent variable and regional development indicators treated as dependent variable. The reviewed documents included policy documents and scientific papers published in various journals and hardcopy textbook from the library. The first literature on attempt to calculate Kenya regions CDP was done by World Bank using night lights as proxy. The approach of using satellite data of night lights was developed by (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-18">
      Henderson, Storeygard, &amp; Weil, 2011
     </xref>) who argued that consumption of electricity is relative to disposable income by all contributors of GDP including households, firms and government entities. Areas with high intensity of night lights give an indication of a high CDP. We use the same approach where the heat map of existing road network is used as a proxy of regional development. We correlate the road infrastructure intensity data with GDP to assess the development patterns of various regions in this study the Kenya Counties and identify those that are lagging behind. This is approach is justified by (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-37">
      Okrasińska &amp; Wojewódzka-Król, 2018
     </xref>) who argues that the benefit of road infrastructure analysis should be done together with the GDP as it is a good indicator of regional growth which is combines all sectors economy of any given region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-27">
      Mankiw, Kneebone, McKenzie, &amp; Rowe, 2006
     </xref>) and (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-22">
      KNBS, 2022
     </xref>). GDP has been used to measure the growth in various regions.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Spatial Data Selection and Analysis</title>
    <p>The existing road network data for the year 2023 was sourced from Kenya Roads Board (KRB). The existing county boundary was sourced from Kenya Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) and later populated with macroeconomic data sourced from KNBS reports. Network density growth and distribution analysis was done using ArcGIS and Geoda mapping and visualization Apps. Supervised Self Organizing Maps (SOMs) were used to generate heat maps indicating the pattern and clustering of road density in various regions. Kernel density which is a function within Esri Armap GIS is used to calculate network density referred in this paper as Kennel density (KD) value. The formula is indicated below Equation 2 adopted from (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-12">
      ESRI, 2023
     </xref>). Kernel density is used to generate a heat map indicating the general clustering of road network infrastructure on the Kenyan space. The density estimation method was pioneered by (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-46">
      Siverman, 1986
     </xref>) and further published in his book (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-45">
      Silverman, 1998
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Equation 2: Kernel Density Calculation, Source: (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-12">
      ESRI, 2023
     </xref>)</p>
    <p>
     <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mtable columnalign="left"> 
       <mtr> 
        <mtd> 
         <mi>
           D 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           e 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           n 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           s 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           i 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           t 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           y 
         </mi> 
         <mo>
           = 
         </mo> 
         <mfrac> 
          <mn>
            1 
          </mn> 
          <mrow> 
           <msup> 
            <mrow> 
             <mrow> 
              <mo>
                ( 
              </mo> 
              <mrow> 
               <mi>
                 R 
               </mi> 
               <mi>
                 a 
               </mi> 
               <mi>
                 d 
               </mi> 
               <mi>
                 i 
               </mi> 
               <mi>
                 u 
               </mi> 
               <mi>
                 s 
               </mi> 
              </mrow> 
              <mo>
                ) 
              </mo> 
             </mrow> 
            </mrow> 
            <mn>
              2 
            </mn> 
           </msup> 
          </mrow> 
         </mfrac> 
         <munderover> 
          <mstyle mathsize="140%" displaystyle="true"> 
           <mo>
             ∑ 
           </mo> 
          </mstyle> 
          <mrow> 
           <mi>
             i 
           </mi> 
           <mo>
             = 
           </mo> 
           <mn>
             1 
           </mn> 
          </mrow> 
          <mi>
            n 
          </mi> 
         </munderover> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            { 
          </mo> 
          <mrow> 
           <mfrac> 
            <mn>
              3 
            </mn> 
            <mi>
              π 
            </mi> 
           </mfrac> 
           <mo>
             − 
           </mo> 
           <mi>
             p 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             o 
           </mi> 
           <msub> 
            <mi>
              p 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              i 
            </mi> 
           </msub> 
           <msup> 
            <mrow> 
             <mrow> 
              <mo>
                ( 
              </mo> 
              <mrow> 
               <mn>
                 1 
               </mn> 
               <mo>
                 − 
               </mo> 
               <msup> 
                <mrow> 
                 <mrow> 
                  <mo>
                    ( 
                  </mo> 
                  <mrow> 
                   <mfrac> 
                    <mrow> 
                     <mi>
                       d 
                     </mi> 
                     <mi>
                       i 
                     </mi> 
                     <mi>
                       s 
                     </mi> 
                     <mi>
                       t 
                     </mi> 
                     <msub> 
                      <mi>
                        a 
                      </mi> 
                      <mi>
                        i 
                      </mi> 
                     </msub> 
                    </mrow> 
                    <mrow> 
                     <mi>
                       R 
                     </mi> 
                     <mi>
                       a 
                     </mi> 
                     <mi>
                       d 
                     </mi> 
                     <mi>
                       i 
                     </mi> 
                     <mi>
                       u 
                     </mi> 
                     <mi>
                       s 
                     </mi> 
                    </mrow> 
                   </mfrac> 
                  </mrow> 
                  <mo>
                    ) 
                  </mo> 
                 </mrow> 
                </mrow> 
                <mn>
                  2 
                </mn> 
               </msup> 
              </mrow> 
              <mo>
                ) 
              </mo> 
             </mrow> 
            </mrow> 
            <mn>
              2 
            </mn> 
           </msup> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            } 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
        </mtd> 
       </mtr> 
       <mtr> 
        <mtd> 
         <mi>
           F 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           o 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           r 
         </mi> 
         <mtext>
             
         </mtext> 
         <mi>
           d 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           i 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           s 
         </mi> 
         <msub> 
          <mi>
            t 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            i 
          </mi> 
         </msub> 
         <mo>
           &lt; 
         </mo> 
         <mi>
           r 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           a 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           d 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           i 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           u 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           s 
         </mi> 
        </mtd> 
       </mtr> 
      </mtable> 
     </math></p>
    <p>where</p>
    <p>i = 1, …, n are the input points. only points in the sum if they are within the radius of the (x, y) location</p>
    <p>Pop<sub>i</sub> = the possible population field value of the point i, which is an operational parameter</p>
    <p>dist<sub>i</sub> = the distance between point i and the (x. y) location</p>
    <p>To assess the spillover effect of road network infrastructure, spatial autocorrelation using Moran’s I index was applied. Spatial correlation is commonly used to assess the degree to which similar observation tend to occur near each other within regions as illustrated by (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-24">
      Leitner, Glasner, &amp; Ourania, 2018
     </xref>) in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref>. This approach of describing the likelihood of a variable to relate to itself and its neighborhood in a region conforms to Tobler’s first law of geography which states ‘everything is related to everything else but near things are more related than distant things’ (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-52">
      Tobler, 1970
     </xref>). Positive spatial autocorrelation is observed when similar values abuts each other. On the other hand, dispersed values are an indication of negative correlation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-32">
      Moraga, 2023
     </xref>) and (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-30">
      Miller, 2004
     </xref>) as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref>.</p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a) (b) (c)Figure 3. Spatial autocorrelation configuration: (a) Positive correlation; (b) Negative correlation; (c) No correlation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-24">
        Leitner, Glasner, &amp; Ourania, 2018
       </xref>).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a) (b) (c)Figure 3. Spatial autocorrelation configuration: (a) Positive correlation; (b) Negative correlation; (c) No correlation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-24">
        Leitner, Glasner, &amp; Ourania, 2018
       </xref>).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2123313-rId20.jpeg?20240731042419" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a) (b) (c)Figure 3. Spatial autocorrelation configuration: (a) Positive correlation; (b) Negative correlation; (c) No correlation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-24">
        Leitner, Glasner, &amp; Ourania, 2018
       </xref>).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2123313-rId21.jpeg?20240731042419" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(a) (b) (c)Figure 3. Spatial autocorrelation configuration: (a) Positive correlation; (b) Negative correlation; (c) No correlation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-24">
        Leitner, Glasner, &amp; Ourania, 2018
       </xref>).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2123313-rId22.jpeg?20240731042419" />
    </fig>
    <p>Figure 3. Spatial autocorrelation configuration: (a) Positive correlation; (b) Negative correlation; (c) No correlation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-24">
      Leitner, Glasner, &amp; Ourania, 2018
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>Moran index was calculated using GIS software by converting the data into cells/grids with attribute values having the clustering of road network with Equation 2. The formula applied in Moran’s calculation is as shown in Equation 3.</p>
    <p>Equation 3 Moran Index formula, Source: (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-24">
      Leitner, Glasner, &amp; Ourania, 2018
     </xref>)</p>
    <p>
     <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mi>
         I 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mfrac> 
        <mrow> 
         <msubsup> 
          <mstyle mathsize="140%" displaystyle="true"> 
           <mo>
             ∑ 
           </mo> 
          </mstyle> 
          <mrow> 
           <mi>
             i 
           </mi> 
           <mo>
             = 
           </mo> 
           <mn>
             1 
           </mn> 
          </mrow> 
          <mi>
            n 
          </mi> 
         </msubsup> 
         <msubsup> 
          <mstyle mathsize="140%" displaystyle="true"> 
           <mo>
             ∑ 
           </mo> 
          </mstyle> 
          <mrow> 
           <mi>
             j 
           </mi> 
           <mo>
             = 
           </mo> 
           <mn>
             1 
           </mn> 
          </mrow> 
          <mi>
            n 
          </mi> 
         </msubsup> 
         <mi>
           w 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           i 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           j 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            ( 
          </mo> 
          <mrow> 
           <mi>
             X 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             i 
           </mi> 
           <mo>
             − 
           </mo> 
           <mi>
             X 
           </mi> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            ) 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            ( 
          </mo> 
          <mrow> 
           <mi>
             X 
           </mi> 
           <mover accent="true"> 
            <mi>
              J 
            </mi> 
            <mo>
              ¨ 
            </mo> 
           </mover> 
           <mo>
             − 
           </mo> 
           <mover accent="true"> 
            <mi>
              X 
            </mi> 
            <mo>
              ¨ 
            </mo> 
           </mover> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            ) 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
        </mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            ( 
          </mo> 
          <mrow> 
           <msubsup> 
            <mstyle mathsize="140%" displaystyle="true"> 
             <mo>
               ∑ 
             </mo> 
            </mstyle> 
            <mrow> 
             <mi>
               i 
             </mi> 
             <mo>
               = 
             </mo> 
             <mn>
               1 
             </mn> 
            </mrow> 
            <mi>
              n 
            </mi> 
           </msubsup> 
           <msubsup> 
            <mstyle mathsize="140%" displaystyle="true"> 
             <mo>
               ∑ 
             </mo> 
            </mstyle> 
            <mrow> 
             <mi>
               j 
             </mi> 
             <mo>
               = 
             </mo> 
             <mn>
               1 
             </mn> 
            </mrow> 
            <mi>
              n 
            </mi> 
           </msubsup> 
           <mi>
             w 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             i 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             j 
           </mi> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            ) 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
         <msubsup> 
          <mstyle mathsize="140%" displaystyle="true"> 
           <mo>
             ∑ 
           </mo> 
          </mstyle> 
          <mi>
            i 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            n 
          </mi> 
         </msubsup> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            ( 
          </mo> 
          <mrow> 
           <mi>
             X 
           </mi> 
           <mo>
             − 
           </mo> 
           <mover accent="true"> 
            <mi>
              X 
            </mi> 
            <mo>
              ¨ 
            </mo> 
           </mover> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            ) 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
        </mrow> 
       </mfrac> 
      </mrow> 
     </math></p>
    <p>n = number of observations (grid cells)</p>
    <p>Xi = the grid or cell value of an attribute being</p>
    <p>Xj = the grid or cell value of the same attribute at a different location</p>
    <p>X = the mean value of the attribute of the cells being observed</p>
    <p>Wij = sum of grids or grids with zero values</p>
    <p>Wij = sum of cells/grids with zero values</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Results and Discussion</title>
   <p>In this section the output of the analysis is presented in three parts. In part one the general distribution of the network is presented, while in part two the regional outlook is discussed. Lastly, part three looks at the relationship between road transport infrastructure network and regional development.</p>
   <sec id="s4_1">
    <title>4.1. Indicators of Regional Development</title>
    <p>A review of existing literature and theoretical frameworks gives a clear indication that there is a close relationship between road network infrastructure network distribution and regional development. A region’s total output depends positively on its infrastructure stock where road network takes a big share (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-2">
      Arbues, Banos, &amp; Mayor, 2015
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>In summary, (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-5">
      Bekisz &amp; Kruszynski, 2021
     </xref>) observes that for any region to operate optimally, it must have a sound and reliable road transport t system. Existing studies which were reviewed have been summarized in the <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref> below.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-"></xref>Table 2. Existing literature on development indicators.</p>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="3.10%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="22.60%"><p style="text-align:center">Author(s)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="18.74%"><p style="text-align:center">Development indicators</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="55.56%"><p style="text-align:center">GDP sub themes</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="3.10%"><p style="text-align:center">1.</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="22.60%">
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-19">
        Ivanova &amp; Masorova, 2013
       </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-19">
        Ivanova &amp; Masorova, 2013
       </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-8">
        Bhattacharya &amp; Sakthivel, 2004
       </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-14">
        Gereffi &amp; Funda, 1992
       </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-28">
        Meadows &amp; Jackson, 1984
       </xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-43">
        Sergei, Mikail, &amp; Kudrov, 2018
       </xref><p style="text-align:center">(), (), (), (), () ()</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.74%"><p style="text-align:center">Gross Domestic Product (GDP)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td aleft pli" width="55.56%"><p style="text-align:left">Employment, wages, consumption, savings, investment and tourism</p><p style="text-align:left">Employment, wages, consumption, savings, investment and tourism</p><p style="text-align:left">Agriculture</p><p style="text-align:left">Industry</p><p style="text-align:left">Manufacturing</p><p style="text-align:left">Services</p><p style="text-align:left">Welfare (life expectancy at birth, infant mortality, adult illiteracy)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="3.10%"><p style="text-align:center">2.</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="22.60%">
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-51">
        Tini, Shah, &amp; Sultan, 2018
       </xref><p style="text-align:center">()</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="18.74%"><p style="text-align:center">Social services and environmental</p></td> 
      <td class="aleft pli" width="55.56%"><p style="text-align:left">Access, to health care</p><p style="text-align:left">Reduced CO<sub>2</sub> emissions</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="3.10%"><p style="text-align:center">3.</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="22.60%">
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-3">
        Asher &amp; Novosad, 2020
       </xref><p style="text-align:center">()</p></td> 
      <td class="aleft pli" width="18.74%"><p style="text-align:left">Social development</p></td> 
      <td class="aleft pli" width="55.56%"><p style="text-align:left">Number of primary schools</p><p style="text-align:left">Number of medical centers</p><p style="text-align:left">Electricity connections</p><p style="text-align:left">Area under irrigation</p><p style="text-align:left">Distance to the nearest town</p><p style="text-align:left">Literacy levels</p><p style="text-align:left">Land ownership</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="3.10%"><p style="text-align:center">4.</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="22.60%">
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-33">
        Ng, Jakarni, &amp; Kulanthayan, 2018
       </xref><p style="text-align:center">()</p></td> 
      <td class="aleft pli" width="18.74%"><p style="text-align:left">Length of road</p><p style="text-align:left">Population</p><p style="text-align:left">Socioeconomic indicators</p></td> 
      <td class="aleft pli" width="55.56%"><p style="text-align:left">Road network</p><p style="text-align:left">Exports</p><p style="text-align:left">Education</p><p style="text-align:left">Physical capital stock</p><p style="text-align:left">urbanization</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="3.10%"><p style="text-align:center">5.</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="22.60%">
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-50">
        Thynell, 2017
       </xref><p style="text-align:center">()</p></td> 
      <td class="aleft pli" width="18.74%"><p style="text-align:left">Food security</p><p style="text-align:left">Uninterruptable food Supply chain</p></td> 
      <td class="aleft" width="55.56%"><p style="text-align:left"></p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="3.10%"><p style="text-align:center">6.</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="22.60%">
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-36">
        Ohlan, 2012
       </xref><p style="text-align:center">()</p></td> 
      <td class="aleft pli" width="18.74%"><p style="text-align:left">Thematic (Agriculture)</p><p style="text-align:left">Infrastructural facilities</p><p style="text-align:left">Industries</p></td> 
      <td class="aleft pli" width="55.56%"><p style="text-align:left">Area of land planted</p><p style="text-align:left">Crop grown</p><p style="text-align:left">Extension services</p><p style="text-align:left">Production</p><p style="text-align:left">Livestock/poultry</p><p style="text-align:left">Machineries</p><p style="text-align:left">Literacy levels, number of schools, health institutions, banks, commercial activity, urbanization</p><p style="text-align:left">Factories, employment, power connections</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="3.10%"><p style="text-align:center">7.</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="22.60%">
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-26">
        Majumder, 2005
       </xref><p style="text-align:center">()</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="18.74%"><p style="text-align:center">Development sectors (country India)</p></td> 
      <td class="aleft pli" width="55.56%"><p style="text-align:left">Agriculture, industrial development, manufacturing,</p><p style="text-align:left">Social (literacy, mortality)</p><p style="text-align:left">Infrastructure (physical and financial)</p><p style="text-align:left">Transport</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
    <p>Existing studies linking road transport network to development have been summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>. It can therefore be concluded a region’s road network infrastructure is directly correlated to its development.</p>
    <p>In the review there are others measures of calculating regional growth but GDP is widely used.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_2">
    <title>4.2. National Outlook of Road Transport Infrastructure Network Distribution</title>
    <p>The results from this section are for the data collected in 2023 by Kenya Roads Board. The heat map is therefore generated indicating the intensity of the road transport infrastructure network clustering within various regions. The network is clustering around central region and the white highlands which are rich agriculturally and located in lower North Rift and Mount Kenya region as indicated in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-#M1">
      Map 1
     </xref>. This should have been an effect of the (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-31">
      Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources, 1955
     </xref>) policy which gave priority to investment in white</p>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Map 1. Map 2: 2023 road network infrastructure density, source: (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-21">
        Kenya Roads Board, 2023
       </xref>).highlands due to the white settlers’ interest in farming. The follow-up policy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-15">
        Government of Kenya, 1965
       </xref>) by independent government supported investment in the same region, the buyers of land in the former white settlers were individuals who were politically connected and could influence the where major investment were to be done.The maximum value for road network kernel density ranges from 0.00 to 1.78 as illustrated in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-#M1">
        Map 1
       </xref>. The high concentration is around Kiambu and neighbouring counties which are zoned as Mountain region economic bloc (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-47">
        State Department for Devolution, 2023
       </xref>). Other regions especially those surrounding Kisii, Nakuru, Eldoret and partially Kisumu also have improved their network density.4.3. Correlation between Road Clustering and Regional DevelopmentA correlation scatter plot of independent variable (road infrastructure network density) and dependent variable (regional development indicator) indicates a positive correction. When a trend line is fitted an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.35 is observed as indicated in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-#G1">
        Graph 1
       </xref>. The linear correlation equation isEquation 4: Correlation between Road Transport Infrastructure and County Development
       <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
  
         <mi>
          
   y
  
         </mi>
  
         <mo>
          
   =
  
         </mo>
  
         <mn>
          
   286.48
  
         </mn>
  
         <mi>
          
   x
  
         </mi>
  
         <mo>
          
   +
  
         </mo>
  
         <mn>
          
   62.854
  
         </mn>
 
        </mrow>

       </math><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-"></xref><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/2123313-rId28.jpeg?20240731042420" /></p>Graph 1. Correlation between road density and county domestic product, data source: (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-21">
        Kenya Roads Board, 2023
       </xref>), (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-22">
        KNBS, 2022
       </xref>).4.4. Regional Distribution</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2123313-rId25.jpeg?20240731042420" />
    </fig>
    <p>The spatial location of key contributors to the CDP econometric model is distributed randomly on the Kenyan space. The regions which are mostly homogenous in terms of natural resources are further divided into counties as administrative units. Each region is characterized by its production factors forming varied sectors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-1">
      Aivazian, Afanasiev, &amp; Kudrov, 2018
     </xref>). The sectors are agriculture, fishing and forestry which contribute to the CDP sectors, others includes manufacturing, tourism, livestock production and mining (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-22">
      KNBS, 2022
     </xref>).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_3">
    <title>4.5. Correlating Road Infrastructure Network and Regional Development</title>
    <p>Existence of reliable and accessible road transport infrastructure is an important policy tool that promotes regional growth while reducing disparity. The logic behind this argument is, existence of good road infrastructure network necessitates mobility. Mobility promotes trade while trade which is a stimulant of regional economic growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-11">
      Elburz &amp; Cubukcu, 2020
     </xref>). Governments formulates regional policies among them allocation of resources for road infrastructure development which enhance competiveness of region while attracting investors whose spillover effect is development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-35">
      OECD, 2009
     </xref>). This implies that areas with good road network will record a progressive regional development trend (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-42">
      Rokicki &amp; Stepniak, 2018
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>From the above paragraph roads can be used as a good indicator of regional development, for the analyzed results which are presented here, road network density is therefore used as a proxy of regional development and disparity. Moran’s I index computation results which were calculated based on the heat map generated using Kernel Density approach will be presented. The presentation is based on how counties are distributed over Kenya classified into economic blocs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-47">
      State Department for Devolution, 2023
     </xref>). Coincidentally the economic blocs are related on the production sectors of the country ranging from agriculture, tourism, mining among others.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_4">
    <title>4.6. Mountain Region Counties and Lake Basin Region Counties</title>
    <p>These are the counties which actively contribute to National GDP where agriculture, fishing and forestry are the main economic activities with a total of 20% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-22">
      KNBS, 2022
     </xref>). The counties include Meru, Nakuru, Murang’a, Nandi, Nyandarua, Kiambu, Bungoma, Kisii, Kakamega, Kericho, Bomet, Narok, Nyeri, TransNzoia, UasinGishu, Kirinyaga and Nyamira. Others include Homabay, Machokos, Migori, and Kisumu. Since Narok county is not in any of the trading blocs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-47">
      State Department for Devolution, 2023
     </xref>) it was included in lake region due its agricultural production. Agricultural products need to be transported to the market urgently since they are perishable hence require good road network.</p>
    <p>The mountain region which is defined with Mount Kenya and Arbadare Ranges has the highest clustering of road network density. The clustering is uniform recording a maximum value of 1.690 kilometers of tarmac road per Km<sup>2</sup> spreading around Kiambu, Nakuru and Nyeri Municipalities. The intensity in heat map diminishes as you move towards Meru (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-#M2">
      Map 2
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>The lake region also depends on agriculture as indicated in (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-22">
      KNBS, 2022
     </xref>) report on County Gross Product (CGP) report. The kernel density values ranges</p>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Map 2. Road Heat map for Lake and Mountain Region.from 0.0 to 1.15 with the southern part covering County having lower values. The areas surrounding Kisii and Kisumu recorded high values of kernel density values ranging from 0.750 to 1.150. The continuity values which are Moran’s I index are 0.913 and 0.965 as indicated in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-#G2">
        Graph 2
       </xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-#G3">
        Graph 3
       </xref>. Since road density has been used as indicator of development the mountain region will record more development has it has a continuous patch stretching from Kiambu to Nyeri and Nakuru of good road network concentration.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-"></xref><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/2123313-rId30.jpeg?20240731042421" /></p>Graph 2. Moran I Index for Lake Basin Region.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-"></xref><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/2123313-rId31.jpeg?20240731042421" /></p>Graph 3. Moran I Index for Mountain Region.4.6.1. North Rift and Frontier CountiesThis region County Gross Product is majorly drawn from livestock and mining sector (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-22">
        KNBS, 2022
       </xref>) as it is mainly arid and semi-arid. Kernel density is highest in areas around Eldoret (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-#M3">
        Map 3
       </xref>) with this zone having different agro climatic condition which allows residents to participate in rain fed agriculture, the area is also a key transport hub with several storage facilities and agro industries.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-"></xref><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/2123313-rId32.jpeg?20240731042422" /></p>Map 3. Road Heat map for North Rift and Frontier Region.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2123313-rId29.jpeg?20240731042421" />
    </fig>
    <p>The patch continuity indices for the two regions are 0.942 in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-#G4">
      Graph 4
     </xref> and 0.674 in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-#G5">
      Graph 5
     </xref>. Frontier region index is high and continuous patch of low network density implying there is less development.</p>
    <fig id="fig6" position="float">
     <label>Figure 6</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Graph 4. Moran I Index for North Rift Region.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-"></xref><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/2123313-rId34.jpeg?20240731042422" /></p>Graph 5. Moran I Index for Frontier Region.4.6.2. Coast (Pwani) Region and South East RegionsLastly, the South East and Pwani regions key aspects of production are tourism, livestock and mining.The regions have lower density of road network (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-#M4">
        Map 4
       </xref>) the patches are continuous as shown in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-#G6">
        Graph 6
       </xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-#G7">
        Graph 7
       </xref> giving a clear indicating that the region’s growth is lower compared other regions.4.6.3. The Impact of Road Network on Regional DevelopmentBased on the results it can be summarized that the spillover effect of road network density is high in the mountain region which has the highest mean value of<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.135040-"></xref><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/2123313-rId35.jpeg?20240731042423" /></p>Map 4. Road Heat map for South East and Pwani Region.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2123313-rId33.jpeg?20240731042422" />
    </fig>
    <p>The study contributes to the theory of regional development by giving an insight on how regional spatial metrics can be used to understand network growth and its impact on regional development. Pedagogical an integrated approach that includes geography theory, economic models and indicative maps have used which makes it easy to understand the distribution of network and add value to the lines which have always been used. We recommend more details study to link the road network work investment patterns vis-à-vis the politics and the role of executive in decision making when it comes to distribution of resources against constitutional requirements.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Aivazian, S., Afanasiev, M.,&amp;Kudrov, A. (2018). Indicators of Regional Development Using Differentiation Characteristics. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 14, 7-22. &gt;https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2018.14-3.1
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Arbués, P., Baños, J. F.,&amp;Mayor, M. (2015). The Spatial Productivity of Transportation Infrastructure. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 75, 166-177. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.03.010
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Asher, S.,&amp;Novosad, P. (2020). Rural Roads and Local Economic Development. American Economic Review, 110, 797-823. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20180268
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bandyopadhyay, R.,&amp;Datta, S. (1989). Strategies for Backward-Area Development: A Systems Approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 40, 737-751. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1989.136
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bekisz, A.,&amp;Kruszynski, M. (2021). Analysis of the Diversity of Regional Development of Road Transport Infrastructure in Poland. European Research Studies Journal, XXIV, 712-723. &gt;https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/2260
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Berg, C. N., Deichmann, U., Liu, Y.,&amp;Harris, S. (2015). Transport Policies and Development. World Bank Group.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Berg, C. N., Deichmann, U., Liu, Y.,&amp;Selod, H. (2016). Transport Policies and Development. The Journal of Development Studies, 53, 465-480. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1199857
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bhattacharya, B. B.,&amp;Sakthivel, S. (2004). Regional Growth and Disparity in India: Comparison of Pre and POSR Reform Decades. Economic and Political Weekly, 39, 1071-1077.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Boateng, R. S., Fricano, R. J.,&amp;Adarkwa, F. (2015). Assessing the Socio-Economic Impacts of Rural Road Improvements in Ghana: A Case Study of Transport Sector Program Support (II). Case Studies on Transport Policy, 3, 355-366. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2015.04.006
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Capello, R. (2011). Location, Regional Growth and Local Development Theories. Aestimum, 58, 1-25.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Elburz, Z.,&amp;Cubukcu, K. M. (2020). Spatial Effects of Transport Infrastructure on Regional Growth: The Case of Türkiye. Spatial Information Research, 29, 19-30. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-020-00332-y
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     ESRI (2023). How Kernel Density Works. How Kernel Density Works—ArcGIS Pro/ Documentation. &gt;https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/spatial-analyst/how-kernel-density-works.htm 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Frank, R. H., Bernanke, B. S., Osberg, L., Cross, M. L.,&amp;Macleen, B. K. (2003). Principles of Macroeconomics, First Canadian Edition. Mc Graw Hill.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gereffi, G.,&amp;Fonda, S. (1992). Regional Paths of Development. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 419-448. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.002223
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Government of Kenya (1965). African Sociolism and Its Application to Planning in Kenya. Government Printer .
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Government of Kenya (2010). The Constititution of Kenya. Government Printer.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hassan, S., Wang, X., Khoo, Y. B.,&amp;Foliente, G. (2017). Accessibilty and Socio-Economic Develoment of Human Settlemnts. PLOS ONE, 12, e0179620.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Henderson, V., Storeygard, A.,&amp;Weil, D. N. (2011). A Bright Idea for Measuring Economic Growth. American Economic Review, 101, 194-199. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.194
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ivanová, E.,&amp;Masárová, J. (2013). Importance of Road Infrastructure in the Economic Development and Competitiveness. Economics and Management, 18, 263-274. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.em.18.2.4253
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jacoby, H. G. (2000). Access to Markets and the Benefits of Rural Roads. The Economic Journal, 110, 713-737. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00562
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kenya Roads Board (2023). Road Condition Survey 2023. Kenya Roads Board.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     KNBS (2022). Gross County Product (GCP). Kenya Natiaonal Burea of Standards (KNBS).
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kurian, N. J. (2000). Widening Disparities in India: Some Indicators. Economic and political Weekly, 35, 538-550.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Leitner, M., Glasner, P.,&amp;Ourania, K. (2018). Laws of Geography. Oxford Research Encyclopedias, Criminilogy and Criminal Justice.&gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.325 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mackinnon, D.,&amp;Docherty, I. (2013). Transport and Economic Development. In J. P. Rodrigue, T. Notteboom,&amp;J. Shaw (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Transport Studies (pp. 3-5). Sage.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Majumder, R. (2005). Infrastructure and Regional Development: Interlikanges in India. Indian Economic Review, XXXX, 167-184.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mankiw, G. N., Kneebone, R. D., McKenzie, K. J.,&amp;Rowe, N. (2006). Principles of Macroeconomics (3rd ed.). Thomson/Nelson.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Meadows, W. J.,&amp;Jackson, P. M. (1984). Infrastrucure and Regional Development: Empirical Findings. Built Environment, 10, 270-281.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Michniak, D. (2015). Main Problems of Transport Infrastructure Development in Slovakia and Effects on Regional Development. Geographia Polonica, 88, 21-39. &gt;https://doi.org/10.7163/gpol.0004
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Miller, H. J. (2004). Tobler’s First Law and Spatial Analysis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94, 284-289. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09402005.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources (1955). A Plan to Intensify the Development of African Agriculture in Kenya. Colony and Protectorate of Kenya.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Moraga, P. (2023). Spatial Autocorrelation. In P. Moraga (Ed.), Spatial Statistics for Data Science: Theory and Practice with R. Chapman&amp;Hall.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ng, C. P., Jakarni, F. M.,&amp;Kulanthayan, S. (2018). Road Infrastructure Development and Economic Growth. IOP Conference Series: Material Science and Engineering, 512, Article ID: 012045.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nigohosyan, D.,&amp;Vutsova, A. (2017). The 2014-2020 European Regional Development Fund Indicators: The Incomplete Evolution. Social Indicators Research, 137, 559-577. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1610-8
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     OECD (2009). Governing Regional Development Policy; The Use of Performance Indicators. OECD Publishing.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ohlan, R. (2012). Pattern of Regional Disparities in Socio-Economic Development in India: District Level Analysis. Social Indicators Research, 114, 841-873. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0176-8
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Okrasińska, I.,&amp;Wojewódzka-Król, K. (2018). Transport Infrastructure Expenditures and the Regional Competitiveness. Transport Economics and Logistics, 77, 95-104. &gt;https://doi.org/10.26881/etil.2018.77.09
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pokharel, R., Bertolini, L.,&amp;te Brömmelstroet, M. (2023). How Does Transportation Facilitate Regional Economic Development? A Heuristic Mapping of the Literature. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 19, Article ID: 100817. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2023.100817
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ragan, C. T.,&amp;Lipsey, R. G. (2008). Macroeconomics. Pearson .
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ramesh, P., Luca, B.,&amp;Marco, B. (2023). How Does Transportation Facilitate Regional Economic Dvelopment? A Leuristic Mapping of Literature. Transportaion Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 19, Article ID: 100817.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref41">
    <label>41</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rodrigue, J. (2020). Transportation and the Spatial Structure. In J. P. Rodrigue (Ed.), The Geography of Transport Systems (pp. 56-89). Routledge. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429346323-2
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref42">
    <label>42</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rokicki, B.,&amp;Stępniak, M. (2018). Major Transport Infrastructure Investment and Regional Economic Development—An Accessibility-Based Approach. Journal of Transport Geography, 72, 36-49. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.08.010
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref43">
    <label>43</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sergei, A. A., Mikail, A. Y.,&amp;Kudrov, A. V. (2018). Indicators of Regional Development Using Differentiation Characteristics. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 14, 7-22. &gt;https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2018.14-3.1
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref44">
    <label>44</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Siliva, J. (2017). National Geographic. The Power of Transportation. &gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Svg7vgniC2c 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref45">
    <label>45</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Silverman, B. W. (1998). Density Estimation for Statistics and Applied Probabilty. Routledge.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref46">
    <label>46</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Siverman, B. W. (1986). Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref47">
    <label>47</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     State Department for Devolution (2023). Regional Economic Blocs. Office of the Deputy President, State Department for Devolution.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref48">
    <label>48</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Stern School of Business and New York University (2016). Beyond Economics: Governance and Infrastructure Development. In I. Walter (Ed.), The Infrastructure Finance Challenge (pp. 40-46). Open Book Publisher.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref49">
    <label>49</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tchanche, B. (2019). A View of Road Transport in Africa. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 13, 296-302. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5897/ajest2018.2575
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref50">
    <label>50</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Thynell, M. (2017). Road to Equal Access: The Role of Transport in Transforming Mobility. Transport and Communications Bulletin for Asia and The Pacific, No, 87, 1-12.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref51">
    <label>51</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tini, N. H., Shah, M. Z.,&amp;Sultan, Z. (2018). Impact of Road Transportation Network on Socio-Economic Well-Being: An Overview of Global Perspective. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 4, 282-296.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref52">
    <label>52</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tobler, W. R. (1970). A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region. Economic Geography, 46, 234-240. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2307/143141
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref53">
    <label>53</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Treasury (2023). 2023/2024 Estimates of Development Expenditure of the Government of Kenya, for the Year Ending 30th June, 2024, Volume II, 9vOTE 10910. Government Printer.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.135040-ref54">
    <label>54</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Whittle, J. (2009). A Short Synthesis of the Link between Infrastructure Provision/Adequacy and Economic Growth. DFID UK.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>