<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ampc
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Advances in Materials Physics and Chemistry
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2162-531X
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2162-5328
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ampc.2024.147009
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ampc-134910
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Chemistry 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Materials Science, Physics 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Mathematics
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Study of the Magnetocaloric Effect in La
    <sub>0.5</sub>Sm
    <sub>0.2</sub>Sr
    <sub>0.3</sub>Mn
    <sub>1-x</sub>Fe
    <sub>x</sub>O
    <sub>3</sub> (x = 0 and 0.05) Manganites with the Mean-Field Theory
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Amnah
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Alofi
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Salha
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Khadhraui
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="affnull">
    <addr-line>
     aCollege of Science Physics Department, Al-Baha University, Al Baha, Saudi Arabia
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     30
    </day> 
    <month>
     07
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    14
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    07
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    113
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    122
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      1,
     </day>
     <month>
      June
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      27,
     </day>
     <month>
      June
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      27,
     </day>
     <month>
      July
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    In this paper, the magnetocaloric in La
    <sub>0.5</sub>Sm
    <sub>0.2</sub>Sr
    <sub>0.3</sub>Mn
    <sub>1-x</sub>Fe
    <sub>x</sub>O
    <sub>3</sub> compounds with x = 0 (LSSMO) and x = 0.05 (LSSMFO) were simulated using mean field model theory. A strong consistency was observed between the theoretical and experimental curves of magnetizations and magnetic entropy changes, 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mo>
       −
      </mo>
      <mi>
       Δ
      </mi>
      <msub> 
       <mi>
        S
       </mi> 
       <mi>
        M
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow>
       <mo>
        (
       </mo> 
       <mi>
        T
       </mi> 
       <mo>
        )
       </mo>
      </mrow>
     </mrow> 
    </math> . Based on the mean-field generated 
    <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mo>
       −
      </mo>
      <mi>
       Δ
      </mi>
      <msub> 
       <mi>
        S
       </mi> 
       <mi>
        M
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow>
       <mo>
        (
       </mo> 
       <mi>
        T
       </mi> 
       <mo>
        )
       </mo>
      </mrow>
     </mrow> 
    </math> , the substantial Temperature-averaged Entropy Change (TEC) values reinforce the appropriateness of these materials for use in magnetic refrigeration technology within TEC (10) values of 1 and 0.57 J∙kg
    <sup>−</sup>
    <sup>1</sup>∙K
    <sup>−</sup>
    <sup>1</sup>under 1 T applied magnetic field.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Manganites
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Magnetization
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Magnetocaloric Effect
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Mean Field Model
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Simulation
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Magnetic refrigeration is gaining increasing attention due to its potential to address environmental concerns and energy efficiency in refrigeration technology. The necessity for magnetic refrigeration arises from the limitations and environmental impact of conventional refrigeration methods, particularly those based on vapor compression cycles and refrigerants with high global warming potential <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-1">
     [1]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-3">
     [3]
    </xref>. Conventional refrigeration systems contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions through the use of hydrofluorocarbon refrigerants, which are known contributors to climate change. Additionally, these systems often suffer from energy inefficiency and require periodic maintenance, leading to increased operating costs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-4">
     [4]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. Magnetic refrigeration offers a sustainable alternative by utilizing the magnetocaloric effect (MCE) in certain materials, which allows for efficient and environmentally friendly cooling without the need for harmful refrigerants. This technology has the potential to significantly reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in various applications, including household refrigerators, air conditioning systems, and industrial cooling processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-7">
     [7]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-9">
     [9]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>The modelling of the MCE plays a crucial role in advancing the understanding and optimization of magnetocaloric materials for various applications. By simulating the behavior of MCE materials under different magnetic fields, temperatures, and compositions, researchers can predict their thermodynamic properties and performance characteristics with high precision <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-10">
     [10]
    </xref>. This predictive capability is essential for designing efficient magnetocaloric cooling systems and optimizing their energy efficiency. Furthermore, simulations enable researchers to explore the underlying mechanisms governing the MCE, such as magnetic phase transitions and lattice dynamics, providing valuable insights into the material’s behavior at the atomic and molecular levels <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-11">
     [11]
    </xref>. Additionally, they allow for the rapid screening of potential magnetocaloric candidates, accelerating the discovery of novel materials with enhanced refrigeration capabilities and reduced environmental impact. Moreover, simulation-based approaches facilitate the design of tailored magnetic structures and configurations to optimize the magnetocaloric response, leading to the development of more compact and cost-effective cooling devices. Overall, they are indispensable tools for advancing the field of magnetic refrigeration and realizing its full potential in addressing global energy and environmental challenges.</p>
   <p>Particularly, the mean-field model serves as a powerful tool in simulating MCE, offering insights into the thermodynamic behavior of magnetocaloric materials under varying magnetic fields <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-12">
     [12]
    </xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-14">
     [14]
    </xref>. In this model, the magnetic interactions within the material are approximated by a mean field, simplifying the complex interactions between individual magnetic moments. By employing the mean-field approach, researchers can predict key thermodynamic properties such as the magnetic entropy change and adiabatic temperature change, which are crucial for evaluating the cooling performance of magnetocaloric materials <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-15">
     [15]
    </xref>. Additionally, this model allows for the investigation of phase transitions and critical phenomena associated with the MCE, shedding light on the underlying physics governing these processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-16">
     [16]
    </xref>. Recent advancements in computational techniques have further enhanced the accuracy and applicability of mean-field simulations, enabling researchers to explore a wide range of magnetocaloric materials and operating conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-17">
     [17]
    </xref>. These simulations have contributed to the discovery of novel magnetocaloric compounds and the optimization of existing materials for practical cooling applications <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-18">
     [18]
    </xref>. Moreover, mean-field modelling provides valuable guidance for the design and engineering of magnetocaloric devices with enhanced efficiency and reliability, driving forward the development of next-generation magnetic refrigeration technologies. In applications way, manganites play a crucial role in the MCE due to their unique magnetic and structural properties <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-19">
     [19]
    </xref>. These materials undergo a magnetostructural transition, leading to significant changes in entropy under the influence of a magnetic field, making them ideal candidates for magnetic refrigeration. Recent studies have investigated the MCE in various manganite compounds, highlighting their potential for efficient cooling applications <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-20">
     [20]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-21">
     [21]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-"></xref>In this work we will apply the mean-field theory to model the MCE in La<sub>0.5</sub>Sm<sub>0.2</sub>Sr<sub>0.3</sub>Mn<sub>1-</sub><sub>x</sub>Fe<sub>x</sub>O<sub>3</sub> compounds with x = 0 (LSSMO) and x = 0.05 (LSSMFO). In their work, Khouloud et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-22">
     [22]
    </xref> investigated the structural, magnetic, and magnetocaloric properties of La<sub>0.5</sub>Sm<sub>0.2</sub>Sr<sub>0.3</sub>Mn<sub>1-</sub><sub>x</sub>Fe<sub>x</sub>O<sub>3</sub> compounds within the range of x from 0 to 0.05. X-ray diffraction analysis reveals the compounds maintain a rhombohedral structure throughout the studied range of x. The substitution of Fe for Mn induces a decrease in the magnetic moment and Curie temperature with increasing Fe content. The compounds exhibit significant magnetocaloric effects, characterized by the maximum magnetic entropy change, which decreases with increasing Fe content.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Results and Discussions</title>
   <p>The Brillouin function, 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         B 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         J 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         x 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>, is commonly used to describe the magnetization M behavior of a ferromagnetic material at finite temperatures T and applied fields H:</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        M 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          H 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          T 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         M 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         0 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         B 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         J 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         x 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>(1)</p>
   <p>Where: 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         M 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         0 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> is the saturation magnetization, 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         B 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         J 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         x 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
        <mi>
          J 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
        <mi>
          J 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mi>
        coth 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mfrac> 
         <mrow> 
          <mn>
            2 
          </mn> 
          <mi>
            J 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            + 
          </mo> 
          <mn>
            1 
          </mn> 
         </mrow> 
         <mrow> 
          <mn>
            2 
          </mn> 
          <mi>
            J 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </mfrac> 
        <mfrac> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            J 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            g 
          </mi> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             μ 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             B 
           </mi> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             k 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             B 
           </mi> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
        </mfrac> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mfrac> 
           <mrow> 
            <mi>
              H 
            </mi> 
            <mo>
              + 
            </mo> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               H 
             </mi> 
             <mrow> 
              <mi>
                e 
              </mi> 
              <mi>
                x 
              </mi> 
              <mi>
                c 
              </mi> 
              <mi>
                h 
              </mi> 
             </mrow> 
            </msub> 
           </mrow> 
           <mi>
             T 
           </mi> 
          </mfrac> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
        <mi>
          J 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mi>
        coth 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mfrac> 
         <mn>
           1 
         </mn> 
         <mrow> 
          <mn>
            2 
          </mn> 
          <mi>
            J 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </mfrac> 
        <mfrac> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            J 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            g 
          </mi> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             μ 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             B 
           </mi> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             k 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             B 
           </mi> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
        </mfrac> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mfrac> 
           <mrow> 
            <mi>
              H 
            </mi> 
            <mo>
              + 
            </mo> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               H 
             </mi> 
             <mrow> 
              <mi>
                e 
              </mi> 
              <mi>
                x 
              </mi> 
              <mi>
                c 
              </mi> 
              <mi>
                h 
              </mi> 
             </mrow> 
            </msub> 
           </mrow> 
           <mi>
             T 
           </mi> 
          </mfrac> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> with 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        x 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          J 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          g 
        </mi> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           μ 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           B 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           k 
         </mi> 
         <mi>
           B 
         </mi> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mfrac> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            H 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            + 
          </mo> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             H 
           </mi> 
           <mrow> 
            <mi>
              e 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              x 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              c 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              h 
            </mi> 
           </mrow> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mi>
           T 
         </mi> 
        </mfrac> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>, 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         H 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          e 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          x 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          c 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          h 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        λ 
      </mi> 
      <mi>
        M 
      </mi> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-23">
     [23]
    </xref> is the exchange magnetic with 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mi>
       λ 
     </mi> 
    </math> is the exchange parameter, J is the total angular momentum, g the Lande factor, 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         μ 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         B 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> is the Bohr magnetron and 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         k 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         B 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> is the Boltzmann.</p>
   <p>By incorporating the expression 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        M 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          T 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          H 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        f 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mfrac> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            H 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            + 
          </mo> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             H 
           </mi> 
           <mrow> 
            <mi>
              e 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              x 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              c 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              h 
            </mi> 
           </mrow> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mi>
           T 
         </mi> 
        </mfrac> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> and utilizing the inverse function 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         f 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> of f, we derive the following relationship:</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mi>
         H 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         f 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msup> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         M 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           H 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            e 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            x 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            c 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            h 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
      </mfrac> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>(2)</p>
   <p>The magnetic entropy can be expressed by Maxwell relations as 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mfrac> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              ∂ 
            </mo> 
            <mi>
              S 
            </mi> 
           </mrow> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              ∂ 
            </mo> 
            <mi>
              H 
            </mi> 
           </mrow> 
          </mfrac> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mfrac> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              ∂ 
            </mo> 
            <mi>
              M 
            </mi> 
           </mrow> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              ∂ 
            </mo> 
            <mi>
              T 
            </mi> 
           </mrow> 
          </mfrac> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mi>
         H 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> or 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mfrac> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              ∂ 
            </mo> 
            <mi>
              S 
            </mi> 
           </mrow> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              ∂ 
            </mo> 
            <mi>
              M 
            </mi> 
           </mrow> 
          </mfrac> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <mfrac> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              ∂ 
            </mo> 
            <mi>
              H 
            </mi> 
           </mrow> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              ∂ 
            </mo> 
            <mi>
              T 
            </mi> 
           </mrow> 
          </mfrac> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mi>
         M 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. Consequently, between two magnetic fields H<sub>1</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>, the magnetic entropy change is given by:</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        Δ 
      </mi> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         S 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         M 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mstyle displaystyle="true"> 
       <mrow> 
        <msubsup> 
         <mo>
           ∫ 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mrow> 
            <mrow> 
             <mi>
               M 
             </mi> 
             <mo>
               | 
             </mo> 
            </mrow> 
           </mrow> 
           <mrow> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               H 
             </mi> 
             <mn>
               1 
             </mn> 
            </msub> 
           </mrow> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mrow> 
            <mrow> 
             <mi>
               M 
             </mi> 
             <mo>
               | 
             </mo> 
            </mrow> 
           </mrow> 
           <mrow> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               H 
             </mi> 
             <mn>
               2 
             </mn> 
            </msub> 
           </mrow> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
        </msubsup> 
        <mrow> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            ( 
          </mo> 
          <mrow> 
           <msup> 
            <mi>
              f 
            </mi> 
            <mrow> 
             <mo>
               − 
             </mo> 
             <mn>
               1 
             </mn> 
            </mrow> 
           </msup> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              ( 
            </mo> 
            <mi>
              M 
            </mi> 
            <mo>
              ) 
            </mo> 
           </mrow> 
           <mo>
             − 
           </mo> 
           <msub> 
            <mrow> 
             <mrow> 
              <mo>
                ( 
              </mo> 
              <mrow> 
               <mfrac> 
                <mrow> 
                 <mo>
                   ∂ 
                 </mo> 
                 <mi>
                   λ 
                 </mi> 
                 <mrow> 
                  <mo>
                    ( 
                  </mo> 
                  <mi>
                    T 
                  </mi> 
                  <mo>
                    ) 
                  </mo> 
                 </mrow> 
                </mrow> 
                <mrow> 
                 <mo>
                   ∂ 
                 </mo> 
                 <mi>
                   T 
                 </mi> 
                </mrow> 
               </mfrac> 
              </mrow> 
              <mo>
                ) 
              </mo> 
             </mrow> 
            </mrow> 
            <mi>
              M 
            </mi> 
           </msub> 
           <mi>
             M 
           </mi> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            ) 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
         <mtext>
           d 
         </mtext> 
         <mi>
           M 
         </mi> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mstyle> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>(3)</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-"></xref>The isotherms 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        M 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          H 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          T 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> of the LSSMO and LSSMFO compounds were analyzed, and the evolution of 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mi>
         H 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
      </mfrac> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> versus 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
      </mfrac> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> at constant magnetization values was plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
     Figure 1
    </xref>. A linear relationship of the plots was observed, with isomagnetics curves shifting towards higher temperature values. Linear fits were applied to these curves to determine the exchange mean-field parameter, obtained from the slopes representing 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         H 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          e 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          x 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          c 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          h 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>.</p>
   <fig id="fig1" position="float">
    <label>Figure 1</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 1. 

      <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
  
        <mfrac> 
   
         <mi>
          
    H
   
         </mi> 
   
         <mi>
          
    T
   
         </mi> 
  
        </mfrac> 
 
       </mrow>

      </math> vs. 

      <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
  
        <mfrac> 
   
         <mn>
          
    1
   
         </mn> 
   
         <mi>
          
    T
   
         </mi> 
  
        </mfrac> 
 
       </mrow>

      </math> with at various magnetizations.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1510961-rId54.jpeg?20240807112835" />
   </fig>
   <p>In the paramagnetic domain or materials with ordered domains like antiferromagnetic, the expansion of M in powers of H or H in powers of M was performed up to the third order, considering the magnetization as an odd function of the field: 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         H 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          e 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          x 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          c 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          h 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         λ 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <mi>
        M 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         λ 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         3 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         M 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         3 
       </mn> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>.</p>
   <fig id="fig2" position="float">
    <label>Figure 2</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 2. Fitting 

      <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
  
        <msub> 
   
         <mi>
          
    H
   
         </mi> 
   
         <mrow> 
    
          <mi>
           
     e
    
          </mi>
    
          <mi>
           
     x
    
          </mi>
    
          <mi>
           
     c
    
          </mi>
    
          <mi>
           
     h
    
          </mi>
   
         </mrow> 
  
        </msub> 
 
       </mrow>

      </math> vs M with the equation: 

      <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
  
        <msub> 
   
         <mi>
          
    H
   
         </mi> 
   
         <mrow> 
    
          <mi>
           
     e
    
          </mi>
    
          <mi>
           
     x
    
          </mi>
    
          <mi>
           
     c
    
          </mi>
    
          <mi>
           
     h
    
          </mi>
   
         </mrow> 
  
        </msub> 
  
        <mo>
         
   =
  
        </mo>
  
        <msub> 
   
         <mi>
          
    λ
   
         </mi> 
   
         <mn>
          
    1
   
         </mn> 
  
        </msub> 
  
        <mi>
         
   M
  
        </mi>
  
        <mo>
         
   +
  
        </mo>
  
        <msub> 
   
         <mi>
          
    λ
   
         </mi> 
   
         <mn>
          
    3
   
         </mn> 
  
        </msub> 
  
        <msup> 
   
         <mi>
          
    M
   
         </mi> 
   
         <mn>
          
    3
   
         </mn> 
  
        </msup> 
 
       </mrow>

      </math>.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1510961-rId61.jpeg?20240807112836" />
   </fig>
   <p>Then, the adjustment of 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         H 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          e 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          x 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          c 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          h 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> versus M in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
     Figure 2
    </xref> is carried out. It has been observed a very small dependence on 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msup> 
       <mi>
         M 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         3 
       </mn> 
      </msup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> which could be negligeable and only 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         λ 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> may be kept. Thus 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         H 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          e 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          x 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          c 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          h 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         λ 
       </mi> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
      </msub> 
      <mi>
        M 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        ≈ 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        λ 
      </mi> 
      <mi>
        M 
      </mi> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>, with 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        λ 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        1.63 
      </mn> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> and 1.46 T.emu<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>.g for LSSMO and LSSMFO samples, respectively.</p>
   <fig id="fig3" position="float">
    <label>Figure 3</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 3. Fitting M vs. 

      <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
  
        <mfrac> 
   
         <mrow> 
    
          <mi>
           
     H
    
          </mi>
    
          <mo>
           
     +
    
          </mo>
    
          <msub> 
     
           <mi>
             H 
           </mi> 
     
           <mrow> 
            <mi>
              e 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              x 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              c 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              h 
            </mi> 
           </mrow> 
    
          </msub> 
   
         </mrow> 
   
         <mi>
          
    T
   
         </mi> 
  
        </mfrac> 
 
       </mrow>

      </math> with the equation: 

      <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
  
        <mi>
         
   M
  
        </mi>
  
        <mrow>
   
         <mo>
          
    (
   
         </mo> 
   
         <mrow> 
    
          <mi>
           
     H
    
          </mi>
    
          <mo>
           
     ,
    
          </mo>
    
          <mi>
           
     T
    
          </mi>
   
         </mrow> 
   
         <mo>
          
    )
   
         </mo>
  
        </mrow>
  
        <mo>
         
   =
  
        </mo>
  
        <msub> 
   
         <mi>
          
    M
   
         </mi> 
   
         <mn>
          
    0
   
         </mn> 
  
        </msub> 
  
        <msub> 
   
         <mi>
          
    B
   
         </mi> 
   
         <mi>
          
    J
   
         </mi> 
  
        </msub> 
  
        <mrow>
   
         <mo>
          
    (
   
         </mo> 
   
         <mi>
          
    x
   
         </mi> 
   
         <mo>
          
    )
   
         </mo>
  
        </mrow>
 
       </mrow>

      </math>.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1510961-rId76.jpeg?20240807112836" />
   </fig>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-"></xref>The next step of this approach involves constructing a scaling plot of M vs. 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          H 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           H 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            e 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            x 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            c 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            h 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
      </mfrac> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>, as depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
     Figure 3
    </xref> with black symbols. Essentially, these curves, converging into a single curve, are fitted with Equation (1) to ascertain M<sub>0</sub>, J, and g. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
     Figure 3
    </xref> displays certain data points that noticeably deviate from the scaling function. These points correspond to the magnetic domain region, characterized by low fields and temperatures below the Curie temperature. The different adjusted parameters of the LSSMO and LSSMFO are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
     Table 1
    </xref>.</p>
   <table-wrap id="table1">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-"></xref>Table 1. Different adjusted parameters of the LSSMO and LSSMFO compounds.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="26.04%"><p style="text-align:center">Sample</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="26.25%"><p style="text-align:center">M<sub>0</sub> (emu.g<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="23.86%"><p style="text-align:center">J</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="23.86%"><p style="text-align:center">g</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="26.04%"><p style="text-align:center">LSSMO</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="26.25%"><p style="text-align:center">82.65</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.86%"><p style="text-align:center">1.98</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.86%"><p style="text-align:center">2.61</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="26.04%"><p style="text-align:center">LSSMFO</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="26.25%"><p style="text-align:center">83.15</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="23.86%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="23.86%"><p style="text-align:center">3.53</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <fig id="fig4" position="float">
    <label>Figure 4</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 4. Comparison between experimental (black symbols) and generated (blue lines) 

      <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
  
        <mi>
         
   M
  
        </mi>
  
        <mrow>
   
         <mo>
          
    (
   
         </mo> 
   
         <mrow> 
    
          <mi>
           
     H
    
          </mi>
    
          <mo>
           
     ,
    
          </mo>
    
          <mi>
           
     T
    
          </mi>
   
         </mrow> 
   
         <mo>
          
    )
   
         </mo>
  
        </mrow>
 
       </mrow>

      </math> curves using the mean-field model.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1510961-rId83.jpeg?20240807112836" />
   </fig>
   <p>The numerical resolution of Equation (1) with the given adjusted parameters λ, J, g and M<sub>0</sub> has been achieved using MATLAB software. Generated (blue lines) and experimental (black symbols) isotherms 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        M 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          H 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          T 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> are correlated as depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
     Figure 4
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
     Figure 5
    </xref> illustrates the comparison between the mean-field generated 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        Δ 
      </mi> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         S 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         M 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> curves (red lines) obtained using Equation (3) and the corresponding experimental results (solid symbols) obtained using the Maxwell relation. A clear agreement is observed between the generated and experimental 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        Δ 
      </mi> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         S 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         M 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> curves.</p>
   <fig id="fig5" position="float">
    <label>Figure 5</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 5. Comparison between experimental (symbols) and simulated (blue lines) 

      <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
  
        <mo>
         
   −
  
        </mo>
  
        <mi>
         
   Δ
  
        </mi>
  
        <msub> 
   
         <mi>
          
    S
   
         </mi> 
   
         <mi>
          
    M
   
         </mi> 
  
        </msub> 
  
        <mrow>
   
         <mo>
          
    (
   
         </mo> 
   
         <mi>
          
    T
   
         </mi> 
   
         <mo>
          
    )
   
         </mo>
  
        </mrow>
 
       </mrow>

      </math> curves using the mean-field model.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1510961-rId92.jpeg?20240807112836" />
   </fig>
   <p>In fact, the applicability of Maxwell relation may be limited in complex systems where deviations from ideal behavior occur, such as in strongly correlated electron systems or systems with competing magnetic interactions. On the other hand, the mean-field model is a simplified theoretical approach that approximates the behavior of a system by assuming that each magnetic moment interacts with an effective average field. This model is often more tractable and can provide reasonable estimates of magnetic properties in many cases, especially for systems where interactions between magnetic moments are relatively weak and can be treated perturbatively. However, it may fail to capture the effects of fluctuations and correlations that are important in strongly interacting systems.</p>
   <p>To assess the efficiency of a refrigerant substance, a proposed metric known as the Temperature-averaged Entropy Change (TEC) is suggested <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-24">
     [24]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-25">
     [25]
    </xref>:</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mtext>
        TEC 
      </mtext> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          Δ 
        </mi> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           T 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            H 
          </mi> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <mi>
            C 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
      <mi>
        max 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         { 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mstyle displaystyle="true"> 
         <mrow> 
          <msubsup> 
           <mo>
             ∫ 
           </mo> 
           <mrow> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               T 
             </mi> 
             <mrow> 
              <mi>
                m 
              </mi> 
              <mi>
                i 
              </mi> 
              <mi>
                d 
              </mi> 
             </mrow> 
            </msub> 
            <mo>
              − 
            </mo> 
            <mfrac> 
             <mrow> 
              <mi>
                Δ 
              </mi> 
              <msub> 
               <mi>
                 T 
               </mi> 
               <mrow> 
                <mi>
                  H 
                </mi> 
                <mo>
                  − 
                </mo> 
                <mi>
                  C 
                </mi> 
               </mrow> 
              </msub> 
             </mrow> 
             <mn>
               2 
             </mn> 
            </mfrac> 
           </mrow> 
           <mrow> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               T 
             </mi> 
             <mrow> 
              <mi>
                m 
              </mi> 
              <mi>
                i 
              </mi> 
              <mi>
                d 
              </mi> 
             </mrow> 
            </msub> 
            <mo>
              + 
            </mo> 
            <mfrac> 
             <mrow> 
              <mi>
                Δ 
              </mi> 
              <msub> 
               <mi>
                 T 
               </mi> 
               <mrow> 
                <mi>
                  H 
                </mi> 
                <mo>
                  − 
                </mo> 
                <mi>
                  C 
                </mi> 
               </mrow> 
              </msub> 
             </mrow> 
             <mn>
               2 
             </mn> 
            </mfrac> 
           </mrow> 
          </msubsup> 
          <mrow> 
           <mrow> 
            <mo>
              | 
            </mo> 
            <mrow> 
             <mi>
               Δ 
             </mi> 
             <msub> 
              <mi>
                S 
              </mi> 
              <mi>
                M 
              </mi> 
             </msub> 
            </mrow> 
            <mo>
              | 
            </mo> 
           </mrow> 
           <mtext>
             d 
           </mtext> 
           <mi>
             T 
           </mi> 
          </mrow> 
         </mrow> 
        </mstyle> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         } 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>(4)</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-"></xref>Where 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        Δ 
      </mi> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          H 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          C 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> represents the specified range of temperatures(in this study 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        Δ 
      </mi> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          H 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          C 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        2 
      </mn> 
      <mo>
        , 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        5 
      </mn> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> and 10 K) and 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          m 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          i 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          d 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> is the temperature maximizing the integration.</p>
   <p>TEC is based on the temperature range within which the material is designed or capable of delivering the maximum isothermal entropy change. This metric aims to quantify the magnitude of the thermodynamic effect across a practical temperature spectrum, thereby indicating the material’s effectiveness in practical applications. Greater performance is achieved with larger TECs at wider 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        Δ 
      </mi> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          H 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          C 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> ranges. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
     Figure 6
    </xref> illustrates the change in TECs as the field changes for various 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        Δ 
      </mi> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          H 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          C 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> values. The values decrease as the temperature span 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        Δ 
      </mi> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          H 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          C 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> increases across all samples.</p>
   <fig id="fig6" position="float">
    <label>Figure 6</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 6. The magnetic field dependence of the temperature-averaged entropy change at different 

      <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
  
        <mi>
         
   Δ
  
        </mi>
  
        <msub> 
   
         <mi>
          
    T
   
         </mi> 
   
         <mrow> 
    
          <mi>
           
     H
    
          </mi>
    
          <mo>
           
     −
    
          </mo>
    
          <mi>
           
     C
    
          </mi>
   
         </mrow> 
  
        </msub> 
 
       </mrow>

      </math>.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1510961-rId109.jpeg?20240807112836" />
   </fig>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-"></xref>The data in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
     Figure 6
    </xref> shows that TEC values stabilize across different 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        Δ 
      </mi> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          H 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          C 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> (2 K, 5 K, 10 K) as the magnetic field changes, indicating that the magnetic field strength, rather than temperature differences, primarily influences TEC. This stabilization suggests that once the magnetic field reaches a certain strength, its effect on entropy change dominates, becoming less dependent on temperature variations. This phenomenon likely arises from the material’s intrinsic properties, with the magnetic field inducing a state where entropy change due to magnetic effects is predominant. At higher magnetic fields, the TEC values plateau, indicating a saturation effect where further increases in the magnetic field do not significantly alter TEC, making the material less sensitive to temperature differences. The significant TEC values obtained further bolster the suitability of these materials for application in magnetic refrigeration technology. Under 1 T field, TEC(10) = 1 and 0.57 J.kg<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>.K<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> for the LSSMO and LSSMFO compounds, respectively. These values are near to the ones of Gd (2.91 J.kg<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>.K<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134910-26">
     [26]
    </xref>.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Conclusion</title>
   <p>In conclusion, isotherms 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        M 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          H 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          T 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> of LSSMO and LSSMFO compounds, were analyzed. the linear fits of 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mi>
         H 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
      </mfrac> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> versus 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
      </mfrac> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> at constant magnetization determine the exchange mean-field 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         H 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          e 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          x 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          c 
        </mi> 
        <mi>
          h 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>, which is approximated as 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        λ 
      </mi> 
      <mi>
        M 
      </mi> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>. A scaling plot of M versus 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          H 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <msub> 
         <mi>
           H 
         </mi> 
         <mrow> 
          <mi>
            e 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            x 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            c 
          </mi> 
          <mi>
            h 
          </mi> 
         </mrow> 
        </msub> 
       </mrow> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
      </mfrac> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> is constructed and fitted to sort out the total angularmomentum J, the Lande factor, g and the saturation magnetization M<sub>0</sub>. The comparison between mean-field generated isotherms 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        M 
      </mi> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          H 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          , 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          T 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> and magnetic entropy change 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        Δ 
      </mi> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         S 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         M 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> curves with experimental results show a strong agreement. A proposed metric, Temperature-averaged Entropy Change (TEC), indicates the materials’ effectiveness in practical applications. The change in TECs with varying fields and specified range of temperatures 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        Δ 
      </mi> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         T 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          H 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          C 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> values further support the materials’ suitability for magnetic refrigeration technology.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>Experimental data were kindly provided by Abdouli K.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Li, L.W. and Mi, Y. (2023) Recent Progress in the Development of Re
     <sub>2</sub>TMTM’O
     <sub>6</sub> Double Perovskite Oxides for Cryogenic Magnetic Refrigeration. Journal of Materials Science&amp;Technology, 136, 1-12. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2022.01.041 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wang, Q.W., Wu, Q., Cheng, H.F., et al. (2023) Review of the Research on Oxides in Low-Temperature Magnetic Refrigeration. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 43, 6665-6680. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.07.063 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hojat, A., Fatimah, M. and Khojasteh-Salkuyeh, Y. (2023) Conceptual Design of Two Novel Hydrogen Liquefaction Processes Using a Multistage Active Magnetic Refrigeration System. Applied Thermal Engineering, 230, Article 120771. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120771 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lee, J.S. (2023) Thermodynamic Analysis on a Magnetic Refrigeration System. International Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration, 31, Article No. 23. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s44189-023-00040-w 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Souheila, M. (2023) Introduction to Magnetic Refrigeration: Magnetocaloric Materials. International Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration, 31, Article No. 5. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s44189-023-00021-z 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gao, L., Wang, P.Y., et al. (2023) Performance Study of a Double-Regenerator Room Temperature Magnetic Refrigerator with 26˚C Temperature Span. International Journal of Refrigeration, 148, 143-151. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2023.01.007 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ali Osman, A., Çetin, S.K., et al. (2023) Magnetic Refrigeration: Current Progress in Magnetocaloric Properties of Perovskite Manganite Materials. Materials Today Communications, Article 105988. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105988 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Suye, B., Yibole, H., Meijuan, W., Wurentuya, B. and Guillou, F. (2023) Influence of the Particle Size on a MnFe (P, Si, B) Compound with Giant Magnetocaloric Effect. AIP Advances, 13, Article 025203. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1063/9.0000371 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Liu, Z.W. (2023) Advances in Metal-Containing Magnetic Materials and Magnetic Technologies. Metals, 13, Article 1318. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/met13071318 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Souhir, B., Hsini, M., et al. (2023) Magnetocaloric Effect and Critical Behavior of the La
     <sub>0.75</sub>Ca
     <sub>0.1</sub>Na
     <sub>0.15</sub>MnO
     <sub>3</sub> Compound. RSC Advances, 13, 16529-16535. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA02443A 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nawel, K., Salha, K. and Hsini, M. (2023) Critical Behaviour and Magnetocaloric Effect Simulation in Tb
     <sub>2</sub>Rh
     <sub>3</sub>Ge. Bulletin of Materials Science, 46, Article No. 221. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-023-03056-5 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Starkov, I.A. and Starkov, A.S. (2023) Modeling of the Magnetobarocaloric Effect in the Framework of the Mean-Field Theory. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 587, Article 171344. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.171344 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Caro, P.J. and de Oliveira, N.A. (2023) Magnetocaloric Effect in R
     <sub>2</sub>Cu
     <sub>2</sub>Cd (R=Gd, Tb, Er, Tm). Physica B: Condensed Matter, 650, Article 414496. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2022.414496 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Abassi, M., Zaidi, N. and Hlil, E.K. (2023) Magnetocaloric Effect Simulation in TbFeSi and DyFeSi Intermetallic Magnetic Alloys Using Mean-Field Model. Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism, 36, 397-401. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-022-06490-4 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pérez, E. and Rodríguez, M. (2022) Mean-Field Simulations of Magnetocaloric Materials under Non-Equilibrium Conditions: Implications for Rapid Cooling Applications. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 143, 1991-2001.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mohamed, H., Hcini, S. and Zemni, S. (2018) Magnetocaloric Effect Studying by Means of Theoretical Models in Pr
     <sub>0.</sub>5Sr
     <sub>0.5</sub>MnO
     <sub>3</sub> Manganite. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 466, 368-375. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.07.051 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mohamed, H., Hcini, S. and Zemni, S. (2019) Magnetocaloric Effect Simulation by Landau Theory and Mean-Field Approximation in Pr
     <sub>0.5</sub>Sr
     <sub>0.5</sub>MnO
     <sub>3</sub>. The European Physical Journal Plus, 134, Article No. 588. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2019-12975-4 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mohamed, H. and Boutaleb, M. (2020) Simulation of the Magnetocaloric Effect by Means of Theoretical Models in Gd
     <sub>3</sub>Ni
     <sub>2</sub> and Gd
     <sub>3</sub>CoNi Systems. The European Physical Journal Plus, 135, Article No. 186. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00105-4 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sudharshan, V., Munendra Pal, T.D.R. and Asthana, S. (2024) Investigation of Magnetocaloric Effect and Critical Field Analysis of Nd
     <sub>0.7</sub>-XLaxSr
     <sub>0.3</sub>MnO
     <sub>3</sub> (X= 0.0-0.3) Manganites. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, 13, Article 043016. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1149/2162-8777/ad3fe7 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Xie, Z.J., Feng, M., Zou, Z.G., Jiang, X.Y. and Zhang, W.J. (2023) Structural, Magnetic, and Magnetocaloric Properties of La
     <sub>0.67</sub>Sr
     <sub>0.33</sub>-XKxMn
     <sub>0.95</sub>Ni
     <sub>0.05</sub>O
     <sub>3</sub> Manganites (X= 0.10, 0.125, and 0.15): A-Site Doping. Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism, 36, 1751-1766. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-023-06617-1 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pan, B.L., Luo, X.Y., Fang, J.Y., Wu, Q., Yu, N.J., et al. (2023) Structural, Magnetic and Magnetocaloric Investigation of La
     <sub>0. 7</sub>-X Eu X Ba
     <sub>0. 3</sub>MnO
     <sub>3</sub> Manganites. Bulletin of Materials Science, 46, Article No. 59. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-022-02882-3 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kh, A., Cherif, W., et al. (2019) Structural, Magnetic and Magnetocaloric Properties of La
     <sub>0.5</sub>Sm
     <sub>0.2</sub>Sr
     <sub>0.3</sub>Mn1-XFexO
     <sub>3</sub> Compounds with (0≤ X≤ 0.15). Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 475, 635-642. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.12.007 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Charles, K. and McEuen, P. (2018) Introduction to Solid State Physics. Wiley.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Liu, Q.Y., Wang, J.F., Xie, H.C., Fu, Q., et al. (2023) Giant Low-Field Magnetocaloric Effect in Hexagonal Eu
     <sub>3</sub>B
     <sub>2</sub>O
     <sub>6</sub> Compound. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 936, Article 168372. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.168372 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Shu, Y.Y., Wang, L.F., Huang, S.L. and Zhang, Y.K. (2024) Magnetic Properties and Large Magneto-Caloric Effect in the Amorphous Ho
     <sub>0.2</sub>Tm
     <sub>0.2</sub>Gd
     <sub>0.2</sub>Co
     <sub>0.2</sub>Al
     <sub>0.2</sub> Ribbons. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 628, Article 122846. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2024.122846 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134910-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pramod, N., Murari, R.M.S. and Daivajna, M.D. (2024) Influence of Heat Sintering on the Physical Properties of Bulk La 0.67 Ca 0.33 MnO
     <sub>3</sub> Perovskite Manganite: Role of Oxygen in Tuning the Magnetocaloric Response. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 26, 5237-5252. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CP04185A
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>