<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojas
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Open Journal of Animal Sciences
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2161-7597
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2161-7627
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ojas.2024.143014
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojas-134495
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Biomedical 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Life Sciences
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Effects of Serum Concentration, Synchronization Time and Confluence on the Cell-Cycle Synchronization Efficiency of Goat Fibroblasts
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Van Khanh
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Nguyen
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Huong Thu Thi
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Vu
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Au Thi
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Hoang
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Yen Kim Thi
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Pham
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Giang Thi Thanh
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Nhan
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Hung Phu
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Lai
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Lan Doan
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Pham
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="affnull">
    <addr-line>
     aKey Laboratory of Animal Cell Biotechnology, National Institute of Animal Science, Hanoi, Vietnam
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     22
    </day> 
    <month>
     05
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    14
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    03
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    194
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    203
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      6,
     </day>
     <month>
      June
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      12,
     </day>
     <month>
      June
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      12,
     </day>
     <month>
      July
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    This study aims to evaluate the effect of serum concentration, synchronization time, and confluence degree on the synchronisation efficiency of goat fibroblast cycle. The results indicated that there was no difference in the percentage of nucleated fibroblasts in the G0/G1 stage between serum concentrations of 0.3% and 0.4% (83.89% and 82.69%, respectively, P &gt; 0.05) as well as between serum concentrations of 0.2% and 0.5% (76.95% and 75.46%, respectively, P &gt; 0.05). The percentage of nucleated fibroblasts in the G0/G1 stage was highest at the concentration of 0.3% and lowest in the control group (83.89% vs. 62.67%, P &lt; 0.05). The results of evaluating the influence of synchronization time showed that the percentage of nucleated fibroblasts in the G0/G1 stage was highest in the 72-hour group compared to the 24-hour, 48-hour, 96-hour and 120-hour groups (85.87% vs. 79.35%; 83.71%; 72.37% and 67.85%, respectively, P &lt; 0.05). Although the percentage of nucleated fibroblasts at the G0/G1 stage of the 72-hour group was higher than the 48-hour group, this difference was insignificant (85.87% and 83.71%, respectively, P &gt; 0.05). The beneficial effect of high confluence was confirmed by the large percentage of nucleated fibroblasts at the G0/G1 stage. The 60% confluency was significantly lower than the 80% and 100% confluency (73.44%, 86.63%, and 87.17%, respectively, P &lt; 0.05). The results indicate that the goat fibroblast cycle synchronization is the most effective at the serum concentration of 0.3%, 72 hours of synchronization and 100% confluency.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Goat Fibroblast
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Cycle Synchronisation
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Serum Concentration
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Synchronization Time
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Confluence
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>The success in creating cloned animals using the somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) technique offers many potential applications in basic research, biomedicine, and agriculture <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. The success of creating cloned animals using SCNT in some animal species was reported, such as buffalos <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-2">
     [2]
    </xref>, dogs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-3">
     [3]
    </xref>, pigs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-4">
     [4]
    </xref>, horses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-5">
     [5]
    </xref>, cats <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-6">
     [6]
    </xref>, and goats <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-7">
     [7]
    </xref>. The SCNT technique has many limitations such as success rates remaining very low in all species with an average of only about 1% of reconstructed embryos leading to live offspring, the high of cloned offspring dying late in pregnancy or soon after birth, this is due to respiratory or cardiovascular problems <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-8">
     [8]
    </xref>. Some studies reported the successful creation of cloned goats. However, the low efficiency of applying the SCNT technique is the main obstacle to the widespread application of this technique <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-9">
     [9]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>The low efficiency of the SCNT technique is reflected in the low embryo development rate to the implantation stage and the high miscarriage rate during pregnancy, leading to poor offspring survival. There are many reasons to explain this problem, such as asynchrony between donor and recipient cells <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-10">
     [10]
    </xref>, abnormal genetic and chromosomal manifestations of donor cells <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-11">
     [11]
    </xref>, embryonic gene expression altered <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-12">
     [12]
    </xref>, the high SCNT embryo apoptosis rate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-13">
     [13]
    </xref>, in which the synchronization between the cycles of the donor cell nucleus and the recipient oocyte protoplasm is a necessary factor for creating a complete cloned embryo from somatic cell nuclear transfer. Donor cells commonly used for the SCNT to create cloned animal embryos are fibroblasts collected from ear tissue or foetal skin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-14">
     [14]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Some studies suggested that using donor cells with nuclei at G0/G1 stage increases the efficiency of creating cloned embryos using SCNT. To obtain nucleated donor cells at the G0/G1 stage, donor cells are mainly grown in a deprived serum culture environment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-15">
     [15]
    </xref>. The productivity of synchronising the fibroblast cycle using low-serum culture depends on several factors, such as cell cycle culture time, serum concentration in the culture medium, and confluence degree of donor cells before synchronization. Therefore, choosing the synchronization culture time, concentration of the culture medium and confluence degree before synchronization will bring high efficiency in creating cloned animal embryos using the SCNT technique. This study aims to optimise cell-cycle synchronization conditions for goat fibroblasts and to set the stage for creating cloned goat embryos in Vietnam.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Material and Methods</title>
   <p>All the experimental procedures used in this study were performed in accordance with Vietnam legislation and according to Decision No. 1137/QĐ-BNN-KHCN of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development in Vietnam on March 28.2023.</p>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Reagents and Chemicals</title>
    <p>All reagents and chemicals used in this study were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Inc. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Petri dishes used for cell culture are originated from Corning Inc. (Corning, NY, USA).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Ethics Statement and Ear Tissues Collection</title>
    <p>Ear tissues collection was carried out according to the standard animal care in Vietnam as per guidelines from the Vietnam National Institute of Animal Sciences (01/2012). Because there are no specific rules regarding animal welfare in Vietnam, we followed the rules in accordance with Vietnamese Law on Animal Health (2015, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-https://vanban.chinhphu.vn/default.aspx?pageid=27160&amp;docid=180584">
      https://vanban.chinhphu.vn/default.aspx?pageid=27160&amp;docid=180584
     </xref>) and Vietnamese Law on Animal Husbandry (2018, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-https://vanban.chinhphu.vn/?pageid=27160&amp;docid=206100">
      https://vanban.chinhphu.vn/?pageid=27160&amp;docid=206100
     </xref>). However, these laws do not clearly explain how to use animals in research. Hence, ear tissues collection in our study was conducted according to the guidelines for using animals in research based on EU Directive 2010/63.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Ear Tissue Collection, Isolation and Culture of Cells</title>
    <p>Ear tissues were collected from Saanen goats at Thuc Thiem goat farm, Ba Vi, Hanoi, Vietnam. These ear tissues were washed with 70% alcohol and completely removed fat and hair. These tissue were transferred into tubes containing DPBS supplemented with 100 IU/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin and immediately transported to the laboratory within 2 - 3 hours. Ear tissues were washed five times in DPBS, then cut into 1 mm<sup>3</sup> pieces, placed on the bottom of a culture plate containing DMEM and 10% foetal bovine serum, and cultured at 37˚C, 5% CO<sub>2</sub>, and saturated air humidity. Change the medium and remove any loose tissue from the bottom of the dish at 24 h post-culture. During the culture, any culture plate infected by bacteria will be removed immediately. When the cells reach 80% - 90% coverage, they will be harvested with 0.25% Trypsin EDTA and continue to be transferred to another culture plate at a ratio of 1:2 or 1:3.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_4">
    <title>2.4. Evaluation of the Developmental Stage of Fibroblast Nuclei Using Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS)</title>
    <p>After synchronization, fibroblasts will be treated with Trypsin EDTA and washed with PBS. Next, mix the cells in PBS to ensure the cells are entirely separate from each other. The cell density is 1 × 10<sup>6</sup> - 1 × 10<sup>7</sup> cells/500μl PBS. Incubate fibroblasts in 70% ethanol solution maintained at 4˚C for 2 hours. Fibroblasts can be kept in the refrigerator for 2˚C - 8˚C or placed on ice. After fixation, centrifuge at a speed of 2000 rpm for 5 minutes. Remove alcohol. Dissolve the cells in 5 ml of PBS, wait 60 seconds, and then centrifuge again with the same speed and time. Discard the supernatant. Dissolve the cells in 5 ml of PBS containing Triton-X 100, propidium iodide (PI) dye, containing RNAse A, and incubate for 15 - 20 minutes at 37˚C or 30 - 45 minutes at room temperature. Samples were analysed by a BD FACSCanto II Flow Cytometer (BD Biosciences, NJ, USA) excited by a 488-nm argon laser source. The emitted light is collected by a filter system for the red wave bands.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_5">
    <title>2.5. Synchronization of the Fibroblast Cycle</title>
    <p>Fibroblasts were washed three times in DMEM medium and then transferred to culture in DMEM co-phase medium with serum concentration, synchronization time, and coverage depending on the experiment. Fibroblasts grown in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% serum will used as the control group.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_6">
    <title>2.6. Experiment Design</title>
    <p>Experiment 1: Evaluation of the effect of serum concentration on the cell-cycle synchronization efficiency of goat fibroblasts</p>
    <p>In this experiment, we synchronised goat fibroblasts at four different serum concentrations: 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4% and 0.5% with 48-hour synchronisation time and 80% coverage. The experiment was repeated six times.</p>
    <p>Experiment 2: Evaluation of the effect of synchronization time on the efficiency of cell-cycle synchronization of goat fibroblasts</p>
    <p>In this experiment, goat fibroblasts were synchronised at five different synchronization times: 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 96 hours and 120 hours at the serum concentration selected in experiment 1 and 80% coverage. The experiment was repeated six times.</p>
    <p>Evaluation of the effect of confluence degree on the cell-cycle synchronization efficiency of goat fibroblasts</p>
    <p>In this experiment, goat fibroblasts were synchronised at three different confluence levels: 60%, 80% and 100% at the serum concentration selected in experiment 1 and synchronization time selected in experiment 2. The experiment was repeated six times.</p>
    <p>The efficiency of goat fibroblast cycle synchronisation in three experiments was evaluated based on the ratio of nucleated goat fibroblasts at the G0/G1 stage.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_7">
    <title>2.7. Data Analysis</title>
    <p>All data were expressed as mean ± SEM values and analysed by ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test, using Graph-Pad Prism software (Version 7.02 for Windows, GraphPad Software, La Jolla, California, USA). To compare two groups, data was analysed by T-test. P &lt; 0.05 was defined as significant difference.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Effect of Serum Concentration on the Cell-Cycle Synchronization Efficiency of Goat Fibroblasts</title>
    <p>The results of evaluating the influence of serum concentration on the efficiency of goat fibroblast cycle synchronization are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>. The results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref> showed that there is no difference in the percentage of nucleated fibroblasts in the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle at serum concentrations of 0.3% and 0.4% (83.89% vs82.69%, respectively, P &gt; 0.05), serum concentrations of 0.2% and 0.5% (76.95% vs75.46%, respectively, P &gt; 0.05). The percentage of nucleated fibroblasts in the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle was highest at the concentration of 0.3% and lowest in the control group (83.89% and 62.67%, respectively, P &lt; 0.05).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Effect of Synchronization Time on the Cell-Cycle Synchronization Efficiency of Goat Fibroblasts</title>
    <p>With the results achieved in experiment 1, in this experiment, we used 0.3% serum in a synchronization medium. The results of evaluating the influence of synchronization time on the efficiency of goat fibroblast cycle synchronization are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>The results shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref> show that the synchronization time affects the efficiency of cell cycle synchronization in the G0/G1 phase. The percentage of goat fibroblasts with nuclei at the G0/G1 stage was highest in the 72-hour group when compared with the 24-hour, 48-hour, 96-hour, and 120-hour groups (85.87% vs 79.35%, 83.71%, 72.37% and 67.85%, respectively). Although the percentage of goat fibroblasts with nuclei at the G0/G1 stage in the 72-hour group was higher than in the 48-hour group, this difference was insignificant (85.87% and 83.71%, respectively, P &gt; 0.05).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Effect of Confluence Degree on the Cell-Cycle Synchronization Efficiency of Goat Fibroblasts</title>
    <p>With the results achieved in experiment 2, in this experiment, we used goat fibroblasts with 0.3% serum for 72 hours. The results of evaluating the influence of confluence degree on the efficiency of goat fibroblast cycle synchronization are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref>. The results shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref> show that confluence degree of goat fibroblasts before synchronization affects the synchronization efficiency of goat fibroblasts. The percentage of goat fibroblasts with nuclei at the G0/G1 stage in the 60% group is significantly lower than the 80% and 100% groups (73.44% vs 86.63%, and 87.17%, respectively, P &lt; 0.05).</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Discussion</title>
   <p>This result shows that culturing goat fibroblasts in a deprived serum culture medium increases the percentage of fibroblasts with nuclei at the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle. Using a FACS system to test the efficiency of goat fibroblast cycle synchronization (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
     Table 1
    </xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
     Figure 1
    </xref>) showed that culturing goat fibroblasts at a concentration of 0.3% or 0.4% was sufficient to produce more than 80% of fibroblasts with nuclei at the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle.</p>
   <p>Deprived serum condition is commonly used to synchronise the fibroblast cycle to the G0/G1 phase <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-15">
     [15]
    </xref>. Fibroblasts in culture often require adequate</p>
   <table-wrap id="table1">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-"></xref>Table 1. Effect of serum concentration on synchronization efficiency of goat fibroblast cycle.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="18.69%"><p style="text-align:center">G0/G1 stage</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="81.31%" colspan="5"><p style="text-align:center">Serum concentration</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="16.25%"><p style="text-align:center">0.2%</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="16.26%"><p style="text-align:center">0.3%</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="16.26%"><p style="text-align:center">0.4%</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="16.26%"><p style="text-align:center">0.5%</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="16.26%"><p style="text-align:center">Control</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.69%"><p style="text-align:center">% (Mean ± SE)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.25%"><p style="text-align:center">76.95<sup>b</sup> ± 2.19</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.26%"><p style="text-align:center">83.89<sup>a</sup> ± 1.64</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.26%"><p style="text-align:center">82.69<sup>a</sup> ± 1.82</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.26%"><p style="text-align:center">75.46<sup>b</sup> ± 1.74</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.26%"><p style="text-align:center">62.67<sup>c</sup> ± 1.45</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>Six replications were performed. Percentage data are shown as mean ± SEM. a, b, c in the same row differ significantly (P &lt; 0.05).</p>
   <table-wrap id="table2">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-"></xref>Table 2. Effect of synchronization time on the synchronisation efficiency of goat fibroblast cycle.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="18.81%"><p style="text-align:center">G0/G1 stage</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="81.19%" colspan="5"><p style="text-align:center">Culture time</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="16.26%"><p style="text-align:center">24 hours</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="16.22%"><p style="text-align:center">48 hours</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="16.22%"><p style="text-align:center">72 hours</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="16.20%"><p style="text-align:center">96 hours</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="16.28%"><p style="text-align:center">120 hours</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.81%"><p style="text-align:center">% (Mean ± SE)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.26%"><p style="text-align:center">79.35<sup>b</sup> ± 1.82</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.22%"><p style="text-align:center">83.71<sup>a</sup> ± 1.71</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.22%"><p style="text-align:center">85.87<sup>a</sup> ± 1.82</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.20%"><p style="text-align:center">72.37<sup>c</sup> ± 2.06</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.28%"><p style="text-align:center">67.85<sup>d</sup> ± 1.98</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>Six replications were performed. Percentage data are shown as mean ± SEM. a, b, c, d in the same row differ significantly (P &lt; 0.05).</p>
   <table-wrap id="table3">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-"></xref>Table 3. Effect of confluence degree on the synchronization efficiency of goat fibroblast cycle.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="21.86%"><p style="text-align:center">G0/G1 stage</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="78.14%" colspan="3"><p style="text-align:center">Confluence degree</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="26.05%"><p style="text-align:center">60%</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="26.05%"><p style="text-align:center">80%</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="26.05%"><p style="text-align:center">100%</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.86%"><p style="text-align:center">% (Mean ± SE)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="26.05%"><p style="text-align:center">73.44<sup>a</sup> ± 2.61</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="26.05%"><p style="text-align:center">86.63<sup>b</sup> ± 1.99</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="26.05%"><p style="text-align:center">87.17<sup>b</sup> ± 1.42</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>Six replications were performed. Percentage data are shown as mean ± SEM. a, b in the same row differ significantly (P &lt; 0.05).</p>
   <fig id="fig1" position="float">
    <label>Figure 1</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 1. Results of synchronisation of goat fibroblasts at 0.3% serum concentration (48 hours of synchronization, 80% confluency). The resolution of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
       Figure 1
      </xref> is 289 × 1017 (pixels).</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1401455-rId15.jpeg?20240715100952" />
   </fig>
   <p>nutritional requirements to complete their mitosis. Serum is often used for in vitro cultures of cell animals. According to Liu et al. (2023) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-16">
     [16]
    </xref>, the present of serum in the culture media as a source of growth and adhesion factors, hormones, lipids, and minerals for the cell culture. When cells are grown in a low-serum culture environment, mitogens and hormones in the culture environment will be reduced, metabolism will decrease, and the cells will return to a resting state (G0) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-17">
     [17]
    </xref>. According to Iyer et al. (1999) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-17">
     [17]
    </xref>, serum deprivation during culture leads to the absence of mitotic signals; thus the cells exit from the cell cycle into the G0 phase rapidly with low metabolic activity. Reducing the serum content in the culture medium causes the degradation of cell proteins, thereby causing the cells to quickly return to the G0 state <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-18">
     [18]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>The results of our study show that the percentage of goat fibroblasts with nuclei at the G0/G1 stage increased significantly when the time of culturing fibroblasts in serum-deficient conditions was extended to 72 hours (85.87%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
     Table 2
    </xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
     Figure 2
    </xref>). This result is higher than that reported by Kues et al. (2000) (78.5%) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-15">
     [15]
    </xref>. However, when increasing the synchronization time to 96 hours and 120 hours, the percentage of fibroblasts with nuclei in G0/G1 tends to decrease (72.37% and 67.85%, respectively). These results are consistent with those reported by Kues et al. (2000) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-15">
     [15]
    </xref>, Goissis et al. (2007) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-19">
     [19]
    </xref>, and Sun et al. (2008) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-20">
     [20]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>In the present study, a synchronization time of more than 72 hours did not increase the percentage of nucleated fibroblasts in the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle. This result is consistent with the report of Kues et al. (2000) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-15">
     [15]
    </xref>, Goissis et al. (2007) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-19">
     [19]
    </xref> and Sun et al. (2008) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-20">
     [20]
    </xref>. Goissis et al. (2007) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-19">
     [19]
    </xref> cultured pig fibroblasts in serum deprivation conditions for 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 96 hours, 120 hours, and 144 hours. Their research results showed that the percentage of fibroblasts with nuclei at G0/G1 was highest in the 48-hour group (86.79%) and tended to gradually decrease in the 72-hour, 96-hour, 120-hour and 144-hour groups (86.09%, 84.27%, 85.45% and 84.18%, respectively). According to Miranda et al. (2009) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-21">
     [21]
    </xref>, increasing the time of culturing fibroblasts in deprived serum conditions will reduce growth factors, steroids, and some factors necessary for mitotic stimulation and the viability of fibroblasts in deprived serum conditions. This is probably the cause of the phenomenon of nucleated fibroblasts at the G0/G1 stage gradually decreasing when culturing fibroblasts in deprived serum conditions is prolonged.</p>
   <p>Results of evaluating the effect of confluence degree on the efficiency of goat fibroblast cycle synchronization show that even though the percentage of goat fibroblasts with nuclei at the G0/G1 stage in the 100% group was higher than the 80% group, this difference was not significant (P &gt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
     Table 3
    </xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
     Figure 3
    </xref>). These results are similar to those reported by Sun et al. (2008) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-20">
     [20]
    </xref>, Dalman et al. (2010) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-22">
     [22]
    </xref>. According to Sun et al. (2008) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-20">
     [20]
    </xref>, at synchronizing, bovine fibroblasts with 100% confluency resulted in the percentage of nucleated fibroblasts in the G0/G1 stage reaching 91.5% after synchronization. Dalman et al. (2010) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-22">
     [22]
    </xref> showed that the use of full confluency is suitable for cell cycle synchronization goat fibroblasts by serum starvation. Meanwhile, according to Miranda et al. (2009) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-21">
     [21]
    </xref>, when bovine fibroblasts were synchronized with 60% - 70% confluency, the percentage of fibroblasts with nuclei at the G0/G1 stage reached 84.1%. When the coverage of the bottom of the culture plate by fibroblasts reaches 100%, fibroblasts no longer have any place to adhere, proliferate, and develop. Therefore, some fibroblasts will temporarily stop dividing and stay resting without proliferation. Besides, some fibroblasts also stop dividing due to low serum concentration in the culture medium, so this may be the reason for</p>
   <fig id="fig2" position="float">
    <label>Figure 2</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 2. Results of synchronization of goat fibroblasts with 72-hour synchronization time (0.3% serum concentration, 80% confluency). The resolution of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
       Figure 2
      </xref> is 520 × 531 (pixels).</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1401455-rId16.jpeg?20240715100952" />
   </fig>
   <fig id="fig3" position="float">
    <label>Figure 3</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 3. Result of synchronization of goat fibroblasts with 100% confluency (0.3% serum, synchronization time 72 hours). The resolution of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
       Figure 3
      </xref> is 500 × 579 (pixels).</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1401455-rId17.jpeg?20240715100952" />
   </fig>
   <p>the phenomenon of the ratio of nucleated fibroblasts at the G0/G1 stage of the 100% group is higher than the 80% and 60% groups.</p>
   <p>These results show that goat fibroblasts were successfully synchronised by using the deprived serum culture method at 0.3% serum concentration, 100% confluency, and 72-hour synchronization time with the rate of goat fibroblasts having nuclei at the G0/G1 stage reaching more than 80%. According to Miranda et al. (2009) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-21">
     [21]
    </xref>, the rate of fibroblasts with nuclei at the G0/G1 stage of more than 80% is enough to use for nuclear transfer and cloned embryo creation.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Conclusion</title>
   <p>In this study, our objective was to ascertain the effects of serum concentration, synchronization time and confluence on the cell cycle synchronization efficiency of goat fibroblasts. Our findings indicate that the goat fibroblast was effectively synchronized by serum deprivation at 0.3% serum concentration, 72 hours of synchronization and 100% confluency.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134495-"></xref>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>The research was carried out at the Key Laboratory of Animal Cell Technology. The authors would like to thank the Vietnamese Ministry of Science and Technology for supporting the project.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.134495-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ross, P.J. and Feltrin, C. (2014) Cloning Animals by Somatic Cell Nuclear Transplantation. Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems, 2014, 307-316. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-52512-3.00222-9 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134495-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Shi, D.S., Lu, F.H., Wei, Y.M., Cui, K.Q., Yang, S.F., et al. (2007) Buffalos (Bubalus bubalis) Cloned by Nuclear Transfer of Somatic Cells. Biology Reproduction, 77, 285-291. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.107.060210 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134495-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lee, B.C., Kim, M.K., Jang, G., et al. (2005) Dogs Cloned from Adult Somatic Cells. Nature, 436, Article No. 641. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/436641a 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134495-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Polejaeva, I.A., Chen, S.-H., et al. (2000) Cloned Pigs Produced by Nuclear Transfer from Adult Somatic Cells. Nature, 407, 86-90. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/35024082 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134495-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Galli, C., Lagutina, I., et al. (2003) A Cloned Horse Born to Its Dam Twin. Nature, 424, Article No. 635. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/424635a 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134495-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Shin, T., Kraemer, D., Pryor, J., et al. (2002) A Cat Cloned by Nuclear Transplantation. Nature, 415, Article No. 859. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/nature723 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134495-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tao, Y., Han, W., Zhang, M., et al. (2009) Production of Boer Goat (Capra hircus) by Nuclear Transfer of Cultured and Cryopreserved Fibroblast Cells into Slaughterhouse-Derived Oocytes. Czech Journal Animal Science, 54, 448-460. &gt;https://doi.org/10.17221/1672-CJAS 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134495-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tong, W.F., Ng, Y.F. and Ng, S.C. (2002) Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer (Cloning): Implications for the Medical Practitioner. Singapore Medical Journal, 43, 369-376.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134495-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Heyman, Y. (2005) Nuclear Transfer: A New Tool for Reproductive Biotechnology in Cattle. Reproduction Nutrition Development, 45, 353-361. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2005026 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134495-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Galli, C., Lagutina, I., Vassiliev, I., Duchi, R. and Lazzari, G. (2002) Comparison of Microinjection (Piezo-Electric) and Cell Fusion for Nuclear Transfer Success with Different Cell Types in Cattle. Cloning Stem Cells, 4, 189-196. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1089/15362300260339476 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134495-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Giraldo, A.M., Lynn, J.W., Godke, R.A. and Bondioli, K.R. (2006) Proliferative Characteristics and Chromosomal Stability of Bovine Donor Cells for Nuclear Transfer. Molecular Reproduction, 73, 1230-1238. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20558 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134495-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wrenzycki, C., Wells, D., Herrmann, Miller, A., Oliver, J., Tervit, R. and Niemann, H. (2001) Nulcear Transfer Protocol Affects Messenger RNA Expression Patterns in Cloned Bovine Blastocysts. Biology of Reproduction, 65, 309-317. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod65.1.309 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134495-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Park, E.S., Hwang, W.S., Jang, G., Cho J.K., Kang S.K., Lee, B.C., Han, J.Y. and Lim, J.M. (2004) Incidence of Apoptosis in Clone Embryos and Improved Development by the Treatment of Donor Somatic Cells with Putative Apoptosis Inhibitors. Molecular Reproduction&amp;Development, 68, 65-71. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20046 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134495-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Brem, G. and Kühholzer, B. (2002) The Recent History of Somatic Cloning in Mammals. Cloning Stem Cells, 4, 57-63. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1089/153623002753632057 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134495-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kues, W.A., Anger, M., Carnwath, J.W., Paul, D., Motlik, J. and Niemann, H. (2000) Cell Cycle Synchronization of Porcine Fetal Fibroblasts: Effects of Serum Deprivation and Reversible Cell Cycle Inhibitors. Biology Reproduction, 62, 412-419. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod62.2.412 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134495-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Liu, S., Yang, W., Li, Y.L. and Sun, C.Q. (2023) Fetal Bovine Serum, an Important Factor Affecting the Reproducibility of Cell Experiments. Scientific Reports, 13, Article No. 1942. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29060-7 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134495-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Iyer, V.R., Eisen, M.B., et al. (1999) The Transcriptional Program in the Response of Human Fibroblasts to Serum. Science, 283, 83-87. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1126/science.283.5398.83 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134495-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Boquest, A.C., Day, B.N. and Prather, R.S. (1999) Flow Cytometric Cell Cycle Analysis of Cultured Porcine Fetal Fibroblast Cells. Biology Reproduction, 60, 1013-1019. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod60.4.1013 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134495-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Goissis, M.D., Caetano, H.V., Marques, M.G., De Barros, F.R., Feitosa, W.B., Milazzotto, M.P., Binelli, M., Assumpção, M.E. and Visintin, J.A. (2007) Effects of Serum Deprivation and Cycloheximide on Cell Cycle of Low and High Passage Porcine Fetal Fibroblasts. Reproduction Domestic Animal, 42, 660-663. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00839.x 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134495-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sun, X.Z., Wang, S.H., Zhang, Y.H. Wang, H.P., et al. (2008) Cell-Cycle Synchronization of Fibroblasts Derived from Transgenic Cloned Cattle Ear Skin: Effects of Serum Starvation, Roscovitine and Contact Inhibition. Zygote, 16, 111-116. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967199407004522 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134495-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Miranda, M.d.S., Bressan, F.F., Zecchin, K.G., et al. (2009) Serum-Starved Apoptotic Fibroblasts Reduce Blastocyst Production but Enable Development to Term after SCNT in Cattle. Cloning Stem Cells, 11, 565-573. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1089/clo.2009.0028 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134495-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dalman, A., Eftekhari-Yazdi, P., et al. (2010) Synchronizing Cell Cycle of Goat Fibroblasts by Serum Starvation Causes Apoptosis. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 45, e46-e53. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2009.01520.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>