<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojf
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Open Journal of Forestry
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2163-0429
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2163-0437
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ojf.2024.143016
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojf-134463
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Earth 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Environmental Sciences
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Effectiveness of Chromated Copper Arsenate against Deteriorating Agents of Eucalyptus Poles and Posts in Four Eco-Regions in Kenya
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Miriam
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Gathogo
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Evanson
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Omuse
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       George
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Muthike
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aKenya Forestry Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     22
    </day> 
    <month>
     05
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    14
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    03
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    281
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    296
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      7,
     </day>
     <month>
      March
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      9,
     </day>
     <month>
      March
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      9,
     </day>
     <month>
      July
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    Previous studies done elsewhere have shown that Eucalyptus poles treated with chromated copper arsenate (CCA) can last over 30 years. Kenya is exceptional because in some eco-regions, the Eucalyptus poles’ life span has greatly reduced to 5 years. The current study was designed to evaluate wood deteriorating agents of CCA-treated Eucalyptus poles and variability in four eco-regions of Kenya, namely, dryland, coastal, highland and humid lake. A total of 360 Eucalyptus pole samples were used for this experiment. Three CCA treatments were used to treat transmission poles at 20 kg/cm
    <sup>3</sup> fencing posts samples at 6 kg/cm
    <sup>3</sup>, and a control group. Results indicated that termites and wood-decay fungi attacks caused wood deterioration in the four eco-regions. The proportion of power transmission pole degradation by wood deteriorating agents varied across eco-regions, between treatments and control and between time after treatments. Dryland eco-regions had the highest termite-related degradation (41.82%) while wood-decay fungi attack was highest in the highland eco-regions (9.20%). Samples treated with 6 kg/cm
    <sup>3</sup> recorded the lowest level of wood deterioration, manifested by minimal superficial termite and wood-decay fungi attack. Samples treated with 20 kg/cm
    <sup>3</sup> were characterized by moderate termite and wood-decay fungi attacks observed around the heartwood region, unlike sapwood. This study concluded that the deterioration of Eucalyptus CCA-treated poles is a question of climatic variability and hence, to increase the poles’ lifespan, CCA treatment should be tailored according to the characteristics of the ecoregion of use. Further investigations will inform the diversity of termites and decay-fungi across different eco-regions.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Wood Deteriorating Agents
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      CCA
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Transmission Poles
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Wood-Decay Fungi
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Wood is a natural, sustainable and organic composite characterized by its hygroscopic behaviour, orthotropic composition, and variable natural durability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-34">
     (Verbist et al., 2019)
    </xref>. Recently, the use of wood has extended social interest, which has led to a global growth in its demand <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-39">
     (Zhu et al., 2016)
    </xref>. Hitherto, this demand is often more than not covered by the production of wood of low natural durability (due to biological deterioration). According to the European Standard EN 350 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-4">
     (CEN, 2015)
    </xref>, wood durability is the “resistance of wood to destruction by wood-destroying organisms”. Wood durability can vary widely depending on the species, the age of the tree from which the wood was derived, the geographical site on which the tree is growing, and the tree growing conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-21">
     (Mazela &amp; Popescu, 2017)
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>In Kenya, Eucalyptus wood is processed for sawn timber, used in building and construction and other secondary processed products like furniture. The species is also used for utility poles, which are largely absorbed in the electricity and telecommunication transmission industry. Other uses include fencing, palisade components, decking supports, railway sleepers, soil stabilization, soil terracing, and terrestrial and aquatic foundation pilings. All these uses expose wood to degradation agents at different levels, which then influences the level of durability of wood.</p>
   <p>The use of wood is subsequently limited due to its susceptibility to wood-degrading organisms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-8">
     (Edlund &amp; Nilsson, 1998)
    </xref>. Decomposition of wood in terrestrial and marine environments, in general, involves many biotic agents including fungi, bacteria, insects, nematodes, molluscs, and crustaceans <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-10">
     (Gelbrich, 2009;
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-19">
     Marais et al., 2022)
    </xref>. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-15">
     Juan and Rosana (2023)
    </xref>, the main biological agents capable of reducing the structural integrity of wood are wood-decay fungi, saproxylic beetles and termites. Biotic degradation agents such as subterranean insects and marine borers occur overshadowing the effect of fungal and bacterial decay but are restricted in geographical spreading and aquatic submissions, respectively <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-6">
     (Clausen, 2010)
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>The natural durability of wood is, therefore, key to the estimation of the service life of wooden products. The wood properties involved in natural durability relate to the structure of lignin in the cell wall, the anatomy of the xylem, nutrient availability, the quantity and composition of heartwood extractives, and the occurrence of moisture-regulating components <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-15">
     (Juan &amp; Rosana, 2023)
    </xref>. For instance, the wood moisture content influences the establishment of wood-deteriorating organisms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-15">
     (Juan &amp; Rosana, 2023)
    </xref> while high lignocellulosic substance makes the wood cell more resistant to deteriorating agents <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-1">
     (Andlar et al., 2018)
    </xref>. During cell wall invasion, wood-decay fungi combine both enzymatic and non-enzymatic mechanisms built on low-molecular-weight compounds. Often, the grabs of saproxylic beetles digest wood cell components, causing deterioration of the wooden structure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-15">
     (Juan &amp; Rosana, 2023)
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Insect and fungi survival rates are also directly affected by climate change, which also affects the population of the bio-agents. Increasing winter temperatures in certain locations have been associated with changes in the occurrence and effects of a range of biotic agents because rates of overwinter survival may confine epidemics and breakouts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-22">
     (McAvoy et al., 2017;
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-20">
     Martín &amp; López, 2023)
    </xref>. Apart from termites and fungi, the other economically important insects causing wood degradation include beetles (Coleoptera) in the families Cerambycidae, and Curculionidae <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-33">
     (Ulyshen, 2016)
    </xref>, termites in the families Kalotermitidae and Rhinotermitidae <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-27">
     (Reinprecht et al., 2016)
    </xref> and carpenter bees <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-31">
     (Sreedevi et al., 2022)
    </xref>. Beetles and carpenter bees can bore large galleries in wood <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-31">
     (Sreedevi et al., 2022)
    </xref>. However, they normally attack debilitated or freshly felled trees and more rarely occur on wood in service <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-28">
     (Rodríguez-Barreal, 1998)
    </xref>. Attack by different wood deteriorating agents is illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
     Figure 1
    </xref>.</p>
   <fig id="fig1" position="float">
    <label>Figure 1</label>
    <caption>
     <title>(A) (B)<p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1621016-rId14.jpeg?20240712094128" /></p><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1621016-rId15.jpeg?20240712094128" /></p>(C) (D)Figure 1. Impact of termites, beetles and wood borers on different species of wood. Courtesy of KEFRI Insect Reference collection.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="" />
   </fig>
   <fig id="fig1" position="float">
    <label>Figure 1</label>
    <caption>
     <title>(A) (B)<p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1621016-rId14.jpeg?20240712094128" /></p><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1621016-rId15.jpeg?20240712094128" /></p>(C) (D)Figure 1. Impact of termites, beetles and wood borers on different species of wood. Courtesy of KEFRI Insect Reference collection.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1621016-rId12.jpeg?20240712094128" />
   </fig>
   <fig id="fig1" position="float">
    <label>Figure 1</label>
    <caption>
     <title>(A) (B)<p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1621016-rId14.jpeg?20240712094128" /></p><p class="imgGroupCss_v"><img class=" imgMarkCss lazy" data-original="https://html.scirp.org/file/1621016-rId15.jpeg?20240712094128" /></p>(C) (D)Figure 1. Impact of termites, beetles and wood borers on different species of wood. Courtesy of KEFRI Insect Reference collection.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1621016-rId13.jpeg?20240712094128" />
   </fig>
   <p>Several bark beetles such as Ips typographus and Dendroctonus ponderosae, have been documented to have earlier emergences and prolonged flight season lengths in warming conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-2">
     (Bentz et al., 2019)
    </xref>. The damage by the bark beetles on wood is demonstrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
     Figure 2
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Treatment of wood with different preservatives is aimed at enhancing the durability of otherwise non-durable or less durable wood or parts of the wood. The most used preservatives in Kenya and to some extent in the East African region include water-based chromated copper arsenate (CCA) and oil-based creosote. CCA is usually formulated to contain 18.5% Copper (CuO), 47.5% Chromium (CrO<sub>3</sub>), and 34.0% Arsenic (As<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>) compounds. These chemicals are pressure-impregnated into the wood targeted for outdoor purposes, to protect it from insects, borers and wood-deteriorating microbes including fungi. Copper</p>
   <fig id="fig2" position="float">
    <label>Figure 2</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 2. Illustration of damage to wood by bark beetles. Courtesy of KEFRI Insect Reference collection.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1621016-rId16.jpeg?20240712094127" />
   </fig>
   <p>as a component in CCA protects wood against fungi and bacteria decay while arsenic is the insecticidal component, protecting wood from wood-deteriorating insects like termites and marine borers. Wood pressure treated with CCA wood preservative is commonly used for outdoor construction materials, transmission poles and fencing posts. Despite its potential against pests and microbes, the CCA efficacy may vary depending on the environmental conditions (temperature, precipitation) of the area from which the wood is sourced, the wood (tree species), and the wood type (heartwood or sapwood). Many wooden poles treated with wood preservatives have been observed to fail across eco-regions in Kenya and other regions possibly due to malpractices during pre-treatment and treatment procedures, in addition to a combination of abiotic and biotic factors responsible for decay <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-23">
     (Muthike &amp; Ali, 2021;
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-30">
     Schultz et al., 2007)
    </xref>. In high-humidity or rainy regions, a small percentage of CCA compounds may gradually be released by leaching and weathering <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-37">
     (Williams et al., 2003)
    </xref>. Release of these compounds can be minimized by applying finish to the surface of the treated wood, but little is known about how or to what degree finish properties affect the release of different preservatives <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-13">
     (Hill, 2007)
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>The objective of this study was to provide information on the cause of lifespan reduction of CCA-treated Eucalyptus wood which has led to questioning the efficacy and quality of CCA preservatives, and variability in wood deteriorating agents in four eco-regions of the country.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Study Site</title>
    <p>Eight sites were selected in the following distinct eco-regions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref>). Wet highland regions were represented by Kenya Forest Service (KFS) Kericho Forest Station and Kenya Forestry Research Institution (KEFRI) Londiani station; KEFRI Kibwezi-Kisayani station and KEFRI Garrissa station represented the hot and dry lowland eco-regions in Eastern Kenya; (Humid Lake regions were represented by KEFRI Migori and Maseno stations, while the humid coastal regions were represented by KEFRI Gede station and KFS Kwale station.</p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 3. Kenya’s map showing the study sites.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1621016-rId17.jpeg?20240712094129" />
    </fig>
    <p>The four eco-regions have a variable average annual temperature, average annual rainfall and elevation in (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-http://weatherpark.com/y/98118">
      http://weatherpark.com/y/98118
     </xref>).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-"></xref>Table 1. Study sites weather data during different assessment months.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.96%"><p style="text-align:center">Eco-region</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.56%"><p style="text-align:center">Site</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center">Month of assessment</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.96%"><p style="text-align:center">Monthly average temperature (˚C)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.40%"><p style="text-align:center">Monthly average rainfall (mm)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Altitude (masl)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="4" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.96%"><p style="text-align:center">Highland eco-regions</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.56%"><p style="text-align:center">Kericho KFS Station</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center">*May</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.96%"><p style="text-align:center">17.0</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.40%"><p style="text-align:center">125.7</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.90%"><p style="text-align:center">2002</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center">**November</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.96%"><p style="text-align:center">18.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.40%"><p style="text-align:center">121.5</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="14.56%"><p style="text-align:center">KEFRI Londiani</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center">*May</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.96%"><p style="text-align:center">16.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.40%"><p style="text-align:center">125.7</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="9.90%"><p style="text-align:center">2325</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center">**November</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.96%"><p style="text-align:center">18.0</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.40%"><p style="text-align:center">121.5</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="4" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.96%"><p style="text-align:center">Dryland eco-regions</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.56%"><p style="text-align:center">KEFRI Kibwezi</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center">*March</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.96%"><p style="text-align:center">24.9</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.40%"><p style="text-align:center">77.0</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.90%"><p style="text-align:center">1020</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center">**November</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.96%"><p style="text-align:center">23.5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.40%"><p style="text-align:center">117.5</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="14.56%"><p style="text-align:center">KEFRI Garissa</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center">*March</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.96%"><p style="text-align:center">30.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.40%"><p style="text-align:center">20.3</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="9.90%"><p style="text-align:center">151</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center">**November</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.96%"><p style="text-align:center">29.0</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.40%"><p style="text-align:center">41.7</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="4" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.96%"><p style="text-align:center">Lake Basin eco-regions</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.56%"><p style="text-align:center">KEFRI Migori</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center">*May</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.96%"><p style="text-align:center">20.0</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.40%"><p style="text-align:center">89.1</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.90%"><p style="text-align:center">1311</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center">**November</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.96%"><p style="text-align:center">20.5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.40%"><p style="text-align:center">105.2</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="14.56%"><p style="text-align:center">KEFRI Maseno</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center">*May</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.96%"><p style="text-align:center">22.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.40%"><p style="text-align:center">142.2</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="9.90%"><p style="text-align:center">1505</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center">**November</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.96%"><p style="text-align:center">23.0</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.40%"><p style="text-align:center">97.1</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="4" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.96%"><p style="text-align:center">Coastal eco-regions</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.56%"><p style="text-align:center">KEFRI Gede</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center">*March</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.96%"><p style="text-align:center">29.0</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.40%"><p style="text-align:center">15.0</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.90%"><p style="text-align:center">20</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center">**November</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.96%"><p style="text-align:center">27.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.40%"><p style="text-align:center">23.8</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="14.56%"><p style="text-align:center">Kwale KFS station</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center">*March</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.96%"><p style="text-align:center">28.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.40%"><p style="text-align:center">21.7</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="9.90%"><p style="text-align:center">412</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center">**November</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.96%"><p style="text-align:center">27.0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.40%"><p style="text-align:center">24.1</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>*First assessment, **Second assessment. The first assessment and second assessment were conducted five and twelve months after the installation of the graveyard experiments. Masl = metre above sea level.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Samples and Treatment Preparation</title>
    <p>A total of 360 pieces of Eucalyptus pole samples were used for this experiment. The sample size was established using the following formula: 4 eco-regions × 2 sites per eco-region × 3 treatments (Control, 6 kg/cm<sup>3</sup> CCA treatment; and 20 kg/cm<sup>3</sup> CCA treatment) × 15 wood samples (replications) per treatment = 360 pieces.</p>
    <p>The samples used in the study were round fencing posts and splits from Eucalyptus power transmission poles. The CCA preservative was diluted into two different concentrations: 20 kg/cm<sup>3</sup> (transmission poles treatment), and 6 kg/cm<sup>3</sup> (fencing posts treatment). The third treatment (T3) was a control batch of splits of power transmission poles with untreated sapwood and heartwood portions.</p>
    <p>The wood samples were air-dried and sawn at the KEFRI Karura workshop. Sawing of transmission pole samples was carried out using a narrow band saw (Wood mizer - LT 70) machine while fencing pole samples were sawn using the Circular Re-saw machine. The round posts were split into two halves exposing the heartwood portions. The transmission pole samples were split into eight pieces exposing the heartwood and CCA-engorged sapwood sections. The transmission poles for control treatment were split into eight pieces exposing untreated sapwood and heartwood. Samples measuring 600 mm long were prepared and used for the graveyard experiments.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Site Establishment</title>
    <p>Measurements were taken using a field measuring tape to allow for a block, housing 3 equal plots, in every site. Staking was done to indicate the points of wood burying pits and the block diagonals. In every plot, 15 holes measuring 150 mm deep and 100 mm wide were pitted with a spacing of 2 m by 2 m between holes. A spacing of 3 m was allowed between the plots. Wood samples were inserted into the holes according to a randomized design developed in Genstatver.19 software and buried to 150 mm depth, exposing 450 mm above ground to allow for reading of labels. The poles were adjusted so that the labels faced the same direction for ease of identification during assessment.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_4">
    <title>2.4. Site Establishment</title>
    <p>Visual observation method was used to assess the samples. The observation was made 5 months (or 7 months for some sites) and 12 months after treatment application and site establishment dates. The study was conducted from Month, Year through Month, Year. During each assessment period, all the wood samples were carefully pulled out of the pits and below-ground activity of wood deteriorating agents as manifested on the wood samples recorded in data sheets. After this observation, the samples were returned to the pits and the soil returned. Additionally, the GPS coordinates for each study site were recorded.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_5">
    <title>2.5. Site Establishment</title>
    <p>Data entry was carried out in Microsoft Excel 2010 and analyzed using R Software Version 4.0.2 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-26">
      (R Core Team, 2022)
     </xref>. Generalized linear model was used to assess any significant differences in the percentage of wood deterioration among treated wood samples and across Eco-regions. Mapping was done by using GPS location points of study sites from Handy GPS into Arc Map 1.0 of ArcGIS.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Wood Deteriorating Agents</title>
    <p>Termites and fungi were the main wood deteriorating agents in all eco-regions surveyed. Attack termites and fungi on the treated and control poles as observed in the field is illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
      Figure 4
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>Termites were also found in all the eco-regions with exception of highland eco-regions. Fungal attacks causing wood deterioration were observed in Highland and Lake eco-regions (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>). The Lake region and highlands ecoregion (only Kericho, except Londiani) had a combination of both termite and fungal attack.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Efficacy of Wood Preservative against Damage by Wood Deteriorating Agents in the Four Eco-Regions of Kenya</title>
    <p>The proportion of fencing poles damaged by wood deteriorating agents after treatment with 6 kg/cm<sup>3</sup> CCA varied across eco-regions (χ<sup>2</sup> = 174.99, df = 7, p &lt; 0.0001), between control and treatment (χ<sup>2</sup> = 127.35, df = 1, p &lt; 0.0001) and between time after treatments (χ<sup>2</sup> = 40.45, df = 1, p &lt; 0.0001). The damages by wood deteriorating agents were highest in coastal region (Gede and Kwale), Kibwezi (dryland eco-regions) and Maseno (lakeside eco-regions) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 4. Illustration of observed damage caused by termites and fungi. 20 kg/cm<sup>3</sup> water based chromated copper arsenate (CCA) treated sample assessment (A), termite activity on heartwood of a 20 kg/cm<sup>3</sup> CCA treated sample (B), 20 kg/m<sup>3</sup> CCA treated sample with a combination of fungal and termite activity (C), an attacked heartwood (HW) and an intact sapwood (SW) (D), an intact 6 kg/m<sup>3</sup> CCA treated sample (E), a control group sample showing higher damage level.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1621016-rId19.jpeg?20240712094132" />
    </fig>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-"></xref>Table 2. Proportion (%) of poles affected with wood deteriorating agents.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="27.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Ecoregion</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="27.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Assessment site</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="44.62%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Deteriorating agent</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="27.69%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="27.69%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="23.45%"><p style="text-align:center">Termites</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="21.16%"><p style="text-align:center">Fungi</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="27.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Coast</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="27.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Gede</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.45%"><p style="text-align:center">100</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.16%"><p style="text-align:center">̶</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.69%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Kwale</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.45%"><p style="text-align:center">100</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.16%"><p style="text-align:center">̶</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Lake region</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Migori</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.45%"><p style="text-align:center">100</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.16%"><p style="text-align:center">7</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.69%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Maseno</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.45%"><p style="text-align:center">100</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.16%"><p style="text-align:center">23</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Dryland</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Garissa</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.45%"><p style="text-align:center">100</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.16%"><p style="text-align:center">̶</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.69%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Kibwezi</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.45%"><p style="text-align:center">100</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.16%"><p style="text-align:center">̶</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Highland</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Kericho</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.45%"><p style="text-align:center">17</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.16%"><p style="text-align:center">87</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.69%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.69%"><p style="text-align:center">Londiani</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.45%"><p style="text-align:center">̶</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.16%"><p style="text-align:center">100</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>En dash ( ̶ ) indicates absence of wood deteriorating agent.</p>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 5. Wood deterioration of fencing posts treated with 20 kg/m<sup>3</sup> water based chromated copper arsenate across locations in four Kenya’s eco-regions: coastal regions (A), dry land regions (B), highland regions (C) and lake-side regions (D).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1621016-rId20.jpeg?20240712094132" />
    </fig>
    <p>Likewise, the proportion of power transmission poles damaged by wood deteriorating agents after treatment with 20 kg/cm<sup>3</sup> CCA varied across locations (χ<sup>2</sup> = 349.37, df = 7, p &lt; 0.0001), between treatment and control (χ<sup>2</sup> = 22.94, df = 1, p &lt; 0.0001) and between time after treatments (χ<sup>2</sup> = 56.44, df = 1, p &lt; 0.0001). The damage by deteriorating agents on transmission poles was highest in coastal eco-regions and lowest in highland eco-regions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
      Figure 6
     </xref>).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Trends in Damage by Different Wood Deterioration Agents</title>
    <p>Deterioration was higher 12 months after treatment in samples treated with 20 kg/cm<sup>3</sup> CCA. However, deterioration was only observed in the untreated portions of the wood, comprising of heartwood and some untreated parts of sapwood. Samples fully treated with 20 kg/cm<sup>3</sup> and 6 kg/cm<sup>3</sup> CCA remained intact. However, in Migori, Gede and Maseno the observation was different, where damage in samples treated with 6 kg/cm<sup>3</sup> was observed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">
      Figure 7
     </xref>).</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Discussion</title>
   <p>Wood is susceptible to biotic and abiotic deteriorating agents. A high proportion of degradation was observed in dryland eco-regions. This degradation was isolated to the untreated parts of the treated wood and was highly attributed to termites and in some cases, fungi decay. These findings corroborate with other earlier studies where fungi decay and termites have been considered as major</p>
   <fig id="fig6" position="float">
    <label>Figure 6</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 6. Wood deterioration of power transmission poles treated with 20 kg/cm<sup>3</sup> water-based chromated copper arsenate in the four eco-regions of Kenya.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1621016-rId21.jpeg?20240712094134" />
   </fig>
   <fig-group id="fig7" position="float">
    <fig id="fig7" position="float">
     <label>Figure 7</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(A)--(B)--(C)--(D)--Figure 7. Trends in proportion of poles attacked under different treatments across the four eco-regions of Kenya.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1621016-rId22.jpeg?20240712094134" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig7" position="float">
     <label>Figure 7</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(A)--(B)--(C)--(D)--Figure 7. Trends in proportion of poles attacked under different treatments across the four eco-regions of Kenya.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1621016-rId23.jpeg?20240712094134" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig7" position="float">
     <label>Figure 7</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(A)--(B)--(C)--(D)--Figure 7. Trends in proportion of poles attacked under different treatments across the four eco-regions of Kenya.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1621016-rId24.jpeg?20240712094134" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig7" position="float">
     <label>Figure 7</label>
     <caption>
      <title>(A)--(B)--(C)--(D)--Figure 7. Trends in proportion of poles attacked under different treatments across the four eco-regions of Kenya.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1621016-rId25.jpeg?20240712094134" />
    </fig>
   </fig-group>
   <p>bioagents involved in the decomposition of wooden poles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-20">
     (Martín &amp; López, 2023;
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-18">
     Liu et al., 2018)
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Reportedly, climate conditions have a major influence on the biological disintegration of wood <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-3">
     (Brischke &amp; Thelandersson, 2014)
    </xref>. Despite the influence of climate conditions, the nature of soil and microorganisms present in the matter pose a higher threat compared to climate conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-12">
     (Hietala et al., 2014)
    </xref>. Temperature and precipitation are important climatic variables that can significantly influence the wood deteriorating agent community development, especially fungi and the decomposition of dead wood <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-9">
     (Edman et al., 2021;
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-36">
     Wijas et al., 2024)
    </xref>. This study highlighted that termite diversity and fungal populations, and their abundance are influenced by temperature, elevation and rainfall. The percentage of attack and observed wood deteriorating agents (termites and fungi) showed variations across the eco-regions. This can be attributed to climatic variations of these eco-regions in terms of temperature and rainfall. For example, eco-regions such as highlands with high rainfall and low temperatures recorded significantly high damage instigated mainly by fungi while wood poles in coastal, lakeside and dryland regions characterized by low rainfall and high temperature were prone to termite attacks. This result corroborates the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-25">
     Palin et al. (2011)
    </xref> who identified Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes as fungal classes predominantly causing decomposition on CCA-treated wood. Several other factors have been shown to influence wood degradation. For instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-5">
     Chen and Olsen (2016)
    </xref> have shown that some soil fungi are capable of modifying wood preservatives like CCA, hence, enabling secondary decomposition of wood by various organisms. Additionally, the complex mutualistic or parasitic influences with symbionts or natural enemies can regulate the populations of many insects and fungal flora in the soil <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-16">
     (Kandasamy et al., 2016)
    </xref>. Soil contact promotes fungal colonization due to the easy accessibility and greater moisture content of wood <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-29">
     (Schultz &amp; Nicholas, 2002)
    </xref>, while heavy rainfalls or flooding, accompanied by elevated temperatures have been known to increase termite activity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-24">
     (Oberst et al., 2019)
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Some termite activities were hidden, and some samples that were seemingly undamaged from external surface had massive termite attacks on the inside presenting completely worn-out wood on the above ground. This was an indication of dry-wood termites following their attack on already fungi-infested wood samples. Similar observations have been reported from other studies where attacks by termites were often discovered too late, leaving the outer wood surface intact while causing substantial destruction to the interior wood material <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-11">
     (Goodell, 2001;
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-38">
     Woodpress.com)
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Heartwood is found in the larger and established transmission poles and not easily in fencing posts. Reduced treatability in heartwood has been identified to cause reduced penetration and retention of preservatives. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-35">
     Wang and De Groot (1996)
    </xref>, this can reduce the durability of heartwood compared to the treated sapwood. Coinciding results were obtained from this study, where termite attack was seen to manifest on heartwood compared to sapwood. The key wood properties involved in wood durability include the amount and composition of heartwood extractives, i.e., secondary low-molecular-weight organic compounds produced during heartwood development, though other factors such as the wood anatomy, density, lignin and moisture content are also intricate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-20">
     (Martín &amp; López, 2023)
    </xref>. The heartwood is considered more durable than the sapwood due to the higher concentration of toxic extractive compounds, such as alkaloids, phenols, and terpenes. In general, extractive content increases from the pith towards the outer heartwood and reaches a maximum at the transition zone between heartwood and sapwood; thus, as the tree ages, the extractive content increases <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-14">
     (Hillis, 2012)
    </xref> and the decay susceptibility decreases <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-32">
     (Taylor et al., 2002)
    </xref>. This agrees with the results from this study where the fencing posts seemed more protected from wood deteriorating agents as manifested by minimal damage. Longitudinally, extractive concentration decreases with tree height. In many species, the outer heartwood at the base of the tree is the most resistant to decay <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-7">
     (Cornelissen et al., 2012)
    </xref>. This did not agree with the results from this study since in Kibwezi and Maseno sites, termites were imposing their attack on the untreated heartwood and in some cases on the transition region between heartwood and sapwood. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-35">
     Wang and De Groot (1996)
    </xref> highlighted that for species with naturally durable heartwood such as Cedars, treatment of heartwood may not be critical. This is not the case for wood species with a less durable heartwood and treatment of heartwood is paramount for bridge construction.</p>
   <p>The current study underlined that for effective wood treatment, the preservative must be able to penetrate the heartwood and the transition region, to ensure wood adequate wood durability. The premature failure of CCA-treated poles observed across climatic regions may be associated with poor quality of treatment, where the heartwood and the transition zone are not chemically impregnated <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134463-17">
     (Lebow et al., 2003)
    </xref> and the heartwood may fail to provide effective durability due to the wood cells being immature (lacking full transformation into heartwood cells with enough extractives).</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Conclusion</title>
   <p>Termites and fungi were the main wood deteriorating agents of the utility wood poles. Termites were found in all the eco-regions with exception of highland eco-regions while fungal attacks were observed only in Highland and Lake eco-regions. This indicated that attacks by termites and wood rot fungi vary based on climatic conditions of the regions. The study highlights that the concentration of CCA is not a major factor influencing wood durability. The study, however, shows that the natural durability of Eucalyptus wood is questionable. To increase utility wood durability, treatment should target to include the heartwood part of the wood material, which was previously known to have natural durability, but seems to be prone to destruction. Further, treatment could be adjusted by the eco-region in which the poles or posts will be used. Wood species with lesser durable heartwood should be treated to the core to enhance wood durability. Higher pressure on such species is recommended during wood treatment for all uses. We recommend further studies to evaluate the mechanisms used by wood-deteriorating organisms, their ecology and mode of dispersion, as well as soil types and wood traits affecting durability of wood in service.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the Government of Kenya through the National Research Fund (NRF) and KEFRI, which facilitated the study. We are grateful for the technical assistance in data collection by Mr Mogire, a staff at KEFRI—National Forest Products Research Programme, and other staff from the respective eco-regions.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Andlar, M., Rezić, T., Marđetko, N., Kracher, D., Ludwig, R.,&amp;Šantek, B. (2018). Lignocellulose Degradation: An Overview of Fungi and Fungal Enzymes Involved in Lignocellulose Degradation. Engineering in Life Sciences, 18, 768-778. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201800039
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bentz, B. J., Jönsson, A. M., Schroeder, M., Weed, A., Wilcke, R. A. I.,&amp;Larsson, K. (2019). Ips typographus and Dendroctonus ponderosae Models Project Thermal Suitability for Intra-and Inter-Continental Establishment in a Changing Climate. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 2, Article No. 1. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2019.00001
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Brischke, C.,&amp;Thelandersson, S. (2014). Modelling the Outdoor Performance of Wood Products—A Review on Existing Approaches. Construction and Building Materials, 66, 384-397. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.087
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     CEN (2015). EN 252: Field Test Method for Determining the Relative Protective Effectiveness of a Wood Preservative in Ground Contact. European Committee for Standardization.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chen, A. Y. Y.,&amp;Olsen, T. (2016). Chromated Copper Arsenate-Treated Wood: A Potential Source of Arsenic Exposure and Toxicity in Dermatology. International Journal of Women’s Dermatology, 2, 8-30. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijwd.2016.01.002
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Clausen, C. A. (2010). Wood Handbook. General Technical Report FPL-GTR 190. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cornelissen, J. H., Sass-Klaassen, U., Poorter, L., van Geffen, K., van Logtestijn, R. S., van Hal, J.,&amp;Hefting, M. M. (2012). Controls on Coarse Wood Decay in Temperate Tree Species: Birth of the LOGLIFE Experiment. Ambio, 41, 231-245. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0304-3
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Edlund, M.-L.,&amp;Nilsson, T. (1998) Testing the Durability of Wood. Material and Structures, 31, 641-647. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02480616
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Edman, M., Hagos, S.,&amp;Fredrik, C. (2021). Warming Effects on Wood Decomposition Depend on Fungal Assembly History. Journal of Ecology, 109, 1919-1930. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13617
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gelbrich, J. (2009) Chapter 1. Introduction. In J. Gelbrich (Ed.), Bacterial Wood Degradation—A Study of Chemical Changes in Wood and Growth Conditions of Bacteria (pp. 135-138). Sierke Verlag.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Goodell, B. (2001). Wood Products: Deterioration by Insects and Marine Organisms. In K. H. Jürgen Buschow, et al. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Materials: Science and Technology (pp. 9696-9701). Elsevier. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043152-6/01760-5
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hietala, A. M., Stefańczyk, E., Nagy, N. E., Fossdal, C. G.,&amp;Alfredsen, G. (2014). Influence of Wood Durability on the Suppressive Effect of Increased Temperature on Wood Decay by the Brown-Rot Fungus Postia placenta. Holzforschung, 68, 123-131. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2012-0157
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hill, C. A. (2007). Wood Modification: Chemical, Thermal and Other Processes. John Wiley&amp;Sons. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/0470021748
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hillis, W. E. (2012). Heartwood and Tree Exudates (Vol. 4). Springer Science&amp;Business Media.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Juan, A. M.,&amp;Rosana, L. (2023). Biological Deterioration and Natural Durability of Wood in Europe. Forests, 14, Article No. 283. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020283
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kandasamy, D., Gershenzon, J.,&amp;Hammerbacher, A. (2016). Volatile Organic Compounds Emitted by Fungal Associates of Conifer Bark Beetles and Their Potential in Bark Beetle Control. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 42, 952-969. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-016-0768-x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lebow, S., Williams, R. S.,&amp;Lebow, P. (2003). Effect of Simulated Rainfall and Weathering on Release of Preservative Elements from CCA Treated Wood. Environmental Science&amp;Technology, 37, 4077-4082. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1021/es0343048
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Liu, D., Liu, G., Chen, L., Wang, J.,&amp;Zhang, L. (2018). Soil pH Determines Fungal Diversity along an Elevation Gradient in Southwestern China. Science China Life Sciences, 61, 718-726. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-017-9200-1
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Marais, B. N., Brischke, C.,&amp;Militz, H. (2022). Wood Durability in Terrestrial and Aquatic Environments—A Review of Biotic and Abiotic Influence Factors. Wood Material Science&amp;Engineering, 17, 82-105. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2020.1779810
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Martín, J. A.,&amp;López, R. (2023). Biological Deterioration and Natural Durability of Wood in Europe. Forests, 14, Article No. 283. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020283
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mazela, B.,&amp;Popescu, C.-M. (2017). Solid Wood. In D. Jones,&amp;C. Brischke (Eds.), Performance of Bio-Based Building Materials (pp. 22-39). Elsevier.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     McAvoy, T. J., Régnière, J., St-Amant, R., Schneeberger, N.,&amp;Salom, S. (2017). Mortality and Recovery of Hemlock Woolly Adelgid (Adelges tsugae) in Response to Winter Temperatures and Predictions for the Future. Forests, 8, Article No. 497. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/f8120497
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Muthike, G.,&amp;Ali, G. (2021). Concrete vs Wooden Poles: Effects of the Shift to Concrete Poles on Tree Growers. &gt;https://www.kefri.org/assets/publications/articles/CONCRETE%20VS%20WOODEN%20POLES.pdf 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Oberst, S., Lenz, M., Lai, J. C.,&amp;Evans, T. A. (2019). Termites Manipulate Moisture Content of Wood to Maximize Foraging Resources. Biology Letters, 15, Article ID: 20190365. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2019.0365
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Palin, O. F., Eggleton, P., Malhi, Y., Girardin, C. A., Rozas-Dávila, A.,&amp;Parr, C. L. (2011). Termite Diversity along an Amazon-Andes Elevation Gradient, Peru. Biotropica, 43, 100-107. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2010.00650.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     R Core Team (2022). Rs: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. &gt;https://www.R-project.org/ 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Reinprecht, L. (2016). Biological Degradation of Wood. In Wood Deterioration, Protection and Maintenance (pp. 62-125). John Wiley&amp;Sons, Ltd. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119106500.ch3
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rodríguez-Barreal, J. A. (1998). Patología de La Madera. Fundación Conde del Valle de Salazar, Ediciones Mundiprensa.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Schultz, T. P.,&amp;Nicholas, D. D. (2002). Development of Environmentally-Benign Wood Preservatives Based on the Combination of Organic Biocides with Antioxidants and Metal Chelators. Phytochemistry, 61, 555-560. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(02)00267-4
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Schultz, T. P., Nicholas, D. D.,&amp;Preston, A. F. (2007). A Brief Review of the Past, Present and Future of Wood Preservation. Pest Management Science, 63, 784-788. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1386
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sreedevi, K., Sree Chandana, P., Correya, J. C., Shashank, P. R., Singh, S.,&amp;Veenakumari, K. (2022). Economically Important Wood Feeding Insects: Their Diversity, Damage and Diagnostics. In Science of Wood Degradation and Its Protection (pp. 115-145). Springer. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8797-6_4
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Taylor, A. M., Gartner, B. L.,&amp;Morrell, J. J. (2002). Heartwood Formation and Natural Durability—A Review. Wood and Fiber Science, 34, 587-611.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ulyshen, M. D. (2016). Wood Decomposition as Influenced by Invertebrates. Biological Reviews, 91, 70-85. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12158
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Verbist, M., Nunes, L., Jones, D.,&amp;Branco, J. M. (2019). Service Life Design of Timber Structures. In B. Ghiassi,&amp;P. B. Lourenco (Eds.), Long-Term Performance and Durability of Masonry Structures (pp. 311-336). Woodhead Publishing. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102110-1.00011-X
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wang, J. Z.,&amp;De Groot, R. (1996). Treatability and Durability of Heartwood. In National Conference on Wood Transportation Structures (pp. 252-260). US Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory; Federal Highway Administration (No. FPL-GTR-94).
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wijas, B. J., Flores-Moreno, H., Allison, S. D., Rodriguez, L. C., Cheesman, A. W., Cernusak, L. A. et al. (2024). Drivers of Wood Decay in Tropical Ecosystems: Termites versus Microbes along Spatial, Temporal and Experimental Precipitation Gradients. Functional Ecology, 38, 546-559. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14494
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Williams, R. S., Lebow, S.,&amp;Lebow, P. (2003). Effect of Weathering on Chromated Copper Arsenate (CCA) Treated Wood: Leaching of Metal Salts and Change in Water Repellency. In Ninety-Ninth Annual Meeting of the American Wood-Preservers’ Association (pp. 125-141, Vol. 99). American Wood-Preservers’ Association.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Woodpress.com. Care for Cultural Material-Wood. &gt;https://careforwood.wordpress.com/biological-degradation 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134463-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhu, H., Luo, W., Ciesielski, P. N., Fang, Z., Zhu, J. Y., Henriksson, G., Himmel, M. E.,&amp;Hu, L. (2016). Wood-Derived Materials for Green Electronics, Biological Devices, and Energy Applications. Chemical Reviews, 116, 9305-9374. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00225
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>