<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ami
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Advances in Molecular Imaging
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2161-6728
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2161-6752
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ami.2024.132002
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ami-134078
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Biomedical 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Life Sciences, Computer Science 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Communications, Physics 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Mathematics
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Development of a Ready-to-Use PSMA-11 Kit Formulation and Biological Evaluation of Binding Affinity
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Maria Renata Valente Brandão
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Freire
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Natália Marchesan
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Bexiga
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Marco Antonio
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Stephano
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       João Ezequiel
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Oliveira
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"> 
      <sup>3</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Carlos Roberto Jorge
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Soares
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"> 
      <sup>3</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Ana Cláudia Camargo
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Miranda
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"> 
      <sup>4</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Anna Carolina de Alcântara
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Barbosa
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"> 
      <sup>4</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Marycel Figols de
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Barboza
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"> 
      <sup>4</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Laura Fernanda
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Garcia
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"> 
      <sup>3</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Luiz Felipe S.
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Teixeira
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"> 
      <sup>3</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Maria Helena Marumo
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Bellini
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"> 
      <sup>3</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Natanael Gomes da
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Silva
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Luiza Mascarenhas
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Balieiro
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Joel
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Mendes
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Elaine Bortoleti de
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Araújo
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aCentro de Radiofarmácia, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN), Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, Brasil
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartamento de Tecnologia Farmacêutica, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas (USP), Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, Brasil
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff3">
    <addr-line>
     aCentro de Biotecnologia, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN), Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, Brasil
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff4">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartamento de Medicina Nuclear do Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo/SP, Brasil
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     26
    </day> 
    <month>
     06
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    13
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    02
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    7
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    22
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      27,
     </day>
     <month>
      January
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      27,
     </day>
     <month>
      January
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      27,
     </day>
     <month>
      April
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    <b>Introduction:</b> 
    <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 is considered the gold standard in detection of micro and oligometastases in advanced prostate cancer, being used for therapeutic planning, as well as, potentially, for evaluating response to treatment. The development of ready-to-use lyophilized kit of PSMA-11 adds quality and safety to the routine use of this radiopharmaceutical and represents a pharmacotechnical challenge as it must preserve the integrity and specificity of the ligand. 
    <b>Methods:</b> PSMA-11 kit formulation was proposed, considering radiolabeling parameters and the preservation of the peptide during the lyophilization process, using mannitol as an excipient. Critical temperature characterization studies were carried out using DSC equipment and the freeze-drying process was developed. The direct radiolabeling conditions were evaluated and standardized using 
    <sup>68</sup>Ge/
    <sup>68</sup>Ga generator eluate from two different manufacturers (ITG and Eckert&amp;Ziegler). The radiochemical purity was evaluated by TLC and HPLC. Biological evaluation was carried out with lyophilized PSMA-11 to demonstrate the integrity of the peptide and preservation of biological activity after the lyophilization process. 
    <b>Results</b>
    <b>:</b>
    <b> </b>Based on critical temperature characterization studies, the freeze-drying cycle was designed to reach a freezing temperature of around −40˚C and primary drying at 2˚C. Using 20 mg of mannitol, an intact and elegant lyophilized cake was obtained. PSMA-11 lyophilized kit was directly labeled with 
    <sup>68</sup>Ga eluate from 
    <sup>68</sup>Ge/
    <sup>68</sup>Ga GMP generators (ITG and Eckert&amp;Ziegler) resulting in % RP &gt; 95% at pH 4.0 to 4.5. The results obtained from in vitro and in vivo biological competition studies confirmed the preservation of PSMA-11 affinity for the receptor after lyophilization.
    <b> Conclusion:</b> A lyophilized formulation (Kit) of PSMA-11 was successfully obtained, which preserved the integrity and biological activity of the peptide and guaranteed radiolabeling efficiency.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Ready-to-Use Kit
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      GMP-Grade Generators
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Metastatic Prostate Cancer
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      PET Imaging
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>According to a study published by The Lancet’s scientific commission, the aging population is expected to drive the incidence of prostate cancer worldwide in the coming decades, and the trend is that the rate of disease growth will be higher in low- and middle-income countries <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. Currently, in the detection of metastatic prostate cancer, molecules targeting the transmembrane receptor type II, called “PSMA” due to the receptor they bind to, prove to be a superior alternative to other conventional imaging modalities and other PET imaging agents like <sup>18</sup>F-FDG or <sup>18</sup>F-Choline <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-2">
     [2]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-3">
     [3]
    </xref>. High levels of PSMA expression are found in metastatic and hormone-resistant prostate cancers, indicating that PSMA expression is correlated with disease progression, making PSMA an ideal target for both diagnosis and treatment of this condition <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-4">
     [4]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>In 2020, <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 was approved in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the PET imaging of PSMA-positive prostate cancer whose specificity and efficiency allow for appropriate therapeutic planning and monitoring of treatment effectiveness <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-5">
     [5]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. The PSMA-11 molecule consists of the hydrophilic pharmacophoric group Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys combined with the efficient acyclic Ga (III) chelator HBED-CC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-7">
     [7]
    </xref>. The acyclic radiometal chelator HBED-CC represents a highly effective complexing agent for <sup>68</sup>Ga, particularly for radio-labeling at room temperature, a fact that makes it highly convenient for preparation in the form of a ready-to-use lyophilized kit <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-8">
     [8]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Gallium-68 labeled radiopharmaceuticals such as <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 can be also prepared by automated synthesis modules, in a robust and reproducible way, while reducing operator exposure to radiation. However, synthesis modules require high installation costs for hot labs to meet radiological protection requirements and good manufacturing practices (GMP) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-9">
     [9]
    </xref>. The development of lyophilized kits of receptor-specific peptides in individual vials for direct labeling with <sup>68</sup>Ga is an economically viable alternative to automated module-based production <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-10">
     [10]
    </xref>. However, there are few PSMA-11 kits approved by regulatory agencies commercially available in the world. The Illumet<sup>TM</sup> kit developed by the company ANMI (Belgium) consists of 2 vials, one containing the lyophilized peptide, and a second sterile vial containing sodium acetate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-11">
     [11]
    </xref>. The IsoPROTrace-11<sup>®</sup> kit developed by Isotopia Molecular Imaging company (Israel) consists of a single vial containing the lyophilized peptide <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-12">
     [12]
    </xref>. A commercially approved kit recommends the use of a pH adjustment solution, which indicates that the employed concentration of sodium acetate has not been optimized or formulated as a buffer to allow the use of HCl solutions with different concentrations. Another issue is that research groups do not usually publish detailed information on the development of the ready-to-use PSMA-11 kit formulation and the lyophilization cycle. Thus, the development of ready-to-use lyophilized PSMA-11 formulations remains an ongoing area of research for the expansion of PET technology in screening patients with metastatic prostate cancer.</p>
   <p>The preparation of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 via lyophilized kit has a strong dependence on a high-quality generator (GMP grade) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-13">
     [13]
    </xref>. The commercial generators Eckert &amp; Ziegler GalliaPharm<sup>®</sup> and ITG Isotope Technologies Garching are both GMP-grade. The GalliaPharm<sup>®</sup> generator has a type II drug master file with the FDA, and ITG features a unique characteristic in the market regarding the reduction of <sup>68</sup>Ge breakthrough with usage <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-14">
     [14]
    </xref>. The characteristics of eluates from different commercial generators vary, particularly in relation to the concentration of the eluting acid solution, a fact that directly interferes with the pH of radiolabeling and must be strongly considered in the development of a ready-to-use kit for labeling PSMA-11 with <sup>68</sup>Ga. Lyophilized kits for radiolabeling with <sup>68</sup>Ga should contain, in addition to the lyophilized precursor, components such as a suitable buffer and stabilizing agents to ensure radiochemical purity and stability of the desired product <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-15">
     [15]
    </xref>. It is also important to emphasize that for any lyophilized formulation, the minimum number of components necessary to confer stability to the peptide and the cake structure should be used. A bulking agent is desired to provide volume and form an elegant cake with good mechanical properties <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-16">
     [16]
    </xref>. Additionally, a bulking agent is important in cases where very small amounts of the active ingredient are used, to prevent mass loss during the freeze-drying process <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-17">
     [17]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-18">
     [18]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>To design an ideal lyophilization process, it is necessary to understand the critical properties of the formulation and how to apply this information to the cycle. The critical properties of the formulation include the glass transition temperature ( 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mtext>
         T 
       </mtext> 
       <mtext>
         g 
       </mtext> 
       <mo>
         ' 
       </mo> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>) in the frozen state and the eutectic temperature (T<sub>eu</sub>). Typically, thermal analysis techniques such as differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) are employed to evaluate the thermal stability of the protein and to improve lyophilization conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-19">
     [19]
    </xref>. Keeping the formulation below the 
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mtext>
         T 
       </mtext> 
       <mtext>
         g 
       </mtext> 
       <mo>
         ' 
       </mo> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> during freezing and lyophilization can preserve the structure and activity of the product <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-20">
     [20]
    </xref>. The goal of this study was to develop a ready-to-use kit for the preparation of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 for commercialization in Brazil. As mentioned, a domestic PSMA-11 kit represents an economically viable alternative to automated production for nuclear medicine centers, and it will enable the expansion of PET-based prostate lesion detection applications in Brazil. The robust PSMA-11 kit described here was optimized for parameters like buffer content, pH conditions, temperature, and bulking agent content. It was demonstrated to effectively prepare the radiopharmaceutical using Ga-68 from two different commercial generators: Eckert &amp; Ziegler (Germany), and Isotope Technologies, ITG (Germany). Kit-formulated <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 was evaluated in biological assays to demonstrate the integrity and stability of the PSMA-11 peptide after the freeze-drying process.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Chemicals</title>
    <p>The Precursor peptides for labeling with <sup>68</sup>Ga (PSMA-11) and <sup>177</sup>Lu (PSMA-I&amp;T) were purchased from ABX (Advanced Biochemical Compounds, Germany) and CMR (Center of Molecular Research, Russia), respectively. A 37% solution of Suprapur<sup>®</sup> hydrochloric acid was purchased from Merck, Germany, with purity of 99.9%. Sodium acetate was purchased from Merck, Germany. All other reagents and solvents were of analytical grade and were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, USA. All materials and media for cell culture, including RPMI (Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium), were purchased from Gibco (USA). Isoflurane was purchased from Cristália Laboratory, Brazil, and Matrigel<sup>®</sup> from Corning<sup>®</sup>, USA.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. <sup>68</sup>Ge/<sup>68</sup>Ga Generator</title>
    <p>The <sup>68</sup>GaCl<sub>3</sub> eluate was obtained from GMP-grade generators provided by two different manufacturers: Isotopen Technologies Garching (ITG) and Eckert &amp; Ziegler (both based in Germany).</p>
    <p>The <sup>68</sup>Ge/<sup>68</sup>Ga generator from ITG was eluted with 4 mL of sterile 0.05 M hydrochloric acid solution and the <sup>68</sup>Ge/<sup>68</sup>Ga generator from Eckert &amp; Ziegler was eluted with 7 mL of sterile 0.1 M hydrochloric acid solution. The hydrochloric acid solution was prepared using 37% ultrapure HCl (99.99%, Merck, Germany) and water for injection as sterile solution. The eluate from both generators was analyzed and met the quality criteria specified by the manufacturers.</p>
    <p><sup>177</sup>LuCl<sub>3</sub> was obtained from INM (Russia) with a specific activity of around 1332 GBq/mg.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Experimental</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Kit Formulation</title>
    <p>Pre-formulation experiments were conducted to select sodium acetate buffer concentration, pH, and volume to achieve the desired pH range (4.0 - 5.0) for the optimal complexation of <sup>68</sup>Ga after the addition of eluates from two <sup>68</sup>Ge/<sup>68</sup>Ga generators (GMP grade, ITG and Eckert &amp; Ziegler) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-21">
      [21]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-22">
      [22]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-23">
      [23]
     </xref>. The maintenance of the desired pH range (4.0 - 5.0) of the buffer after lyophilization was evaluated following lyophilization of the vials by adding an acid-base indicator (Congo Red). The amount of mannitol to be used in the formulation was also evaluated in the freeze-drying process. Labeling experiments were conducted using the intended formulation with the aim of optimizing the reaction pH, assessing the radiolabeling temperature, and investigating the influence of adding two different concentrations of mannitol to the formulation.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Thermal Analysis and Lyophilization Cycle Design</title>
    <p>The thermal analysis of the formulation containing mannitol and the PSMA-11 peptide was conducted using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC 4000 Perkin Elmer, USA). The primary objective of this analysis was to investigate the thermal properties of the formulation, including phase transitions and thermal behavior during cooling and heating. Initially, a 30 µL sample of the formulation was carefully pipetted into a hermetically sealed aluminum container. The analyses were conducted using a cooling program, starting from room temperature to −60˚C at a rate of 5˚C/minute, followed by heating to 20˚C at a rate of 10˚C /minute, with the insertion of hold times to stabilize the temperature at specific points.</p>
    <p>The results obtained from the thermal analysis were used to guide the lyophilization process designed to ensure the stability and integrity of the final product. The lyophilization test cycle took place in a benchtop lyophilizer model Advantage Pro with Intellitronics controller from SP Scientific, Pennsylvania (USA).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. PSMA-11 Kit Radiolabeling with <sup>68</sup>Ga</title>
    <p>The PSMA-11 kit was radiolabeled by adding 1 mL of sodium acetate buffer (1.5 M, pH 5.0) and 4 mL of Ga-68 eluted in 0.05 M HCl from the ITG generator (~223.8 MBq) or 3.5 mL of <sup>68</sup>GaCl<sub>3</sub> eluted in 0.1M HCl from Eckert &amp; Ziegler generator, at room temperature for 10 minutes.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. PSMA-I&amp;T Radiolabeling with <sup>177</sup>Lu</title>
    <p>The radiopharmaceutical <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-I&amp;T for in vivo studies was prepared by incubating 20 µg (13.3 nmols) of PSMA-I&amp;T with 429.2 MBq of <sup>177</sup>LuCl<sub>3</sub> at 95˚C and 450 rpm for 30 minutes in a 0.52 M sodium ascorbate buffer (200 µL, pH 4.7).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_5">
    <title>3.5. Quality Control</title>
    <p>Two chromatographic systems determined the radiochemical purity of PSMA-11 kit with Ga-68. High Pressure Liquid Chromatography (radio-HPLC) (Shimadzu, Japan) analysis was conducted using a C-18 column (Waters model Symmetry<sup>®</sup> C18, 5 µm, 250 mm × 4.6 mm), eluted at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min by (A) water 0.1% TFA and (B) acetonitrile 0.1% TFA, in the following gradient mode: 0 - 0.5 min 5% B; 0.5 - 10.0 min 40% B; 10.0 - 16.0 min 5% B. Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC-SG) was performed on silica gel 60 plate (Merck, Germany) and ammonium acetate 77 g/L: methanol (1:1) RF, <sup>68</sup>Ga-colloidal = 0.0 - 0.1; RF, <sup>68</sup>Ga-peptide = 0.7 - 1.0. The TLC-SG strips were quantified with a radio TLC-scanner (AR-2000 Eckert &amp; Ziegler Radiopharma Inc., USA) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-24">
      [24]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>The HPLC analysis method for determining the radiochemical purity of <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-I&amp;T was conducted under the following conditions: Symmetry<sup>®</sup> C18 column, 5 µm, Waters 250 × 4.6 mm; mobile phase: (A) water/0.1% TFA and (B) Acetonitrile/0.1% TFA; gradient 10% to 45% of B over 20 minutes at a flow rate of 1 mL/minute <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-25">
      [25]
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_6">
    <title>3.6. Biological Evaluation</title>
    <p>The in vitro and in vivo competition assays were performed with the radiotracer <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-I&amp;T and lyophilized PSMA-11 (employed as a competitor). The cell line used was human androgen-dependent prostate carcinoma (LNCaP-Lymph Node Carcinoma of the Prostate) PSMA-positive (ATCC<sup>®</sup> CRL-1740<sup>TM</sup>). LNCaP cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies, MD, USA) supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), 300 µg/mL streptomycin and 100 U/mL penicillin. Cultures were maintained at 37˚C under an atmosphere of 5% CO<sub>2</sub>/humidified air. One day before the experiments, cells were harvested using Trypsin/EDTA (0.05% and 0.02%), centrifuged and suspended in culture medium, counted and 2 × 10<sup>5</sup> LNCaP cells were seeded per well in 6-well plates. The plates were maintained at 37˚C under a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO<sub>2</sub>/air in an incubator.</p>
    <p>In vivo competition study was performed in SCID-BALB/c mice with LNCap cell prostate tumor model. To induce tumor growth, LNCaP cells (5 × 10<sup>6</sup> cells/100 µL) were suspended in PBS supplemented with 20% Matrigel (Corning<sup>®</sup> Matrigel<sup>®</sup>, USA) and inoculated subcutaneously into the dorsal area of SCID mice (4 - 5 weeks old; IPEN Animal Facility). The mice were previously anesthetized with isoflurane.</p>
    <p>In the competition experiments, the final concentration of the <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-I&amp;T radiotracer in each tube was 5 nM/mL, and the concentration of PSMA-11 competitor was 75 nM/mL, in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% FBS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-26">
      [26]
     </xref>. The PSMA-11 was reconstituted from a lyophilized vial obtained with the parameters developed in the present study, aiming to assess the effect of freeze-drying on the ability of the peptide to recognize the PSMA receptor. The experiments were performed in triplicate as two independent experiments. LNCaP cells (2 × 10<sup>5</sup> per well) were incubated with the radiotracer <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-I&amp;T with and without the PSMA-11 competitor at 4˚C for 60 minutes. The incubation was stopped by removing the radiotracer and competitor and washing the wells with 1 mL of PBS. The cells were then lysed using 1 mL of 1M NaOH solution. The lysate was transferred to counting tubes. The quantification of radioactivity in CPM was performed using an automatic gamma counter with NaI (TI) crystals (D5002 Cobra II, Packard Canberra), and the values were converted to fmol of <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-I&amp;T. Finally, the data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism software (version 5.00<sup>®</sup>). Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Significant difference was assessed using the unpaired t-test (two-tailed) with Welch’s correction. P values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p>
    <p>The in vivo competition study was conducted by injecting the radiotracer <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-I&amp;T into two groups of tumor-bearing mice (n = 5 for each group), one of the groups receiving an excess of PSMA-11 (100 µg/animal), prepared by reconstituting lyophilized PSMA-11 with 0.9% sodium chloride solution, 30 minutes before the administration of the <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-I&amp;T. After 60 minutes of the radiopharmaceutical administration, the animals were euthanized, and samples of blood and organs of interest were collected as well as the tumor. The percentages of administered activity per gram of organ or tumor were determined relative to a standard of administered dose using an automatic gamma counter with NaI (TI) crystals (D5002 Cobra II, Packard Canberra). Quantitative data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Significant differences were assessed using two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-test for in vivo statistical analysis. P values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_7">
    <title>3.7. Statistical Analysis</title>
    <p>All graphs and statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software (version 5.00<sup>®</sup>). Quantitative data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The tools used to analyze significant differences were described for each competition assay. P values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Results</title>
   <sec id="s4_1">
    <title>4.1. Kit Formulation</title>
    <p>A volume of 1 mL of sodium acetate buffer at a concentration of 1.5 M and pH 5.0 maintained the desired pH between 4 and 5 when adding volumes of 4 mL and 3.5 mL of 0.05 M HCl and 0.1 M HCl, respectively. The peptide should be lyophilized without the presence of the labeling buffer. The high concentration of salts in the labeling buffer resulted in the collapse of the cakes in initial lyophilization cycle tests. Furthermore, buffer freeze-drying tests employing Red of Congo indicator revealed the change in buffer pH during the freeze-drying cycle. In this way, the formulation of the PSMA-11 kit was developed in two vials: vial 1, containing the peptide (20 µg) and the bulking agent mannitol (20 mg), in lyophilized form and vial 2, containing the radiolabeling sodium acetate buffer solution at pH 5.0.</p>
    <p>Studies on variation of mannitol mass made it possible to conclude that the use of 20 mg of mannitol instead 5 mg per vial resulted in an elegant and consistent lyophilized cake.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_2">
    <title>4.2. Thermal Analysis and Lyophilization Cycle Design</title>
    <p>The thermal analysis of the formulation containing the PSMA-11 peptide and mannitol showed a glass transition temperature ( 
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <msubsup> 
        <mtext>
          T 
        </mtext> 
        <mtext>
          g 
        </mtext> 
        <mo>
          ' 
        </mo> 
       </msubsup> 
      </mrow> 
     </math>) of −42.90˚C and a eutectic temperature (T<sub>eu</sub>) of 5.10˚C (data shown in “<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>”).</p>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 1. DSC curve obtained for the PSMA-11 with mannitol formulation. The sample was cooled to −60˚C at a rate of 5˚C /minute and then heated to 20˚C at a rate of 10˚C/minute. Critical temperatures can be observed: eutectic melting = 5.10˚C and 

       <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
  
         <msubsup> 
   
          <mtext>
           
    T
   
          </mtext> 
   
          <mtext>
           
    g
   
          </mtext> 
   
          <mo>
           
    '
   
          </mo> 
  
         </msubsup> 
 
        </mrow>

       </math> = −42.90˚C.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4100096-rId18.jpeg?20240626034105" />
    </fig>
    <p>Based on the critical temperature characterization studies, the freezing temperature of the lyophilization cycle was defined and primary drying was conducted at 2˚C. A freezing rate of 0.5˚C/minute was utilized, along with a holding time before the freezing step, to form larger pores and crystals, aiming to facilitate sublimation.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_3">
    <title>4.3. PSMA-11 Kit Radiolabeling with <sup>68</sup>Ga</title>
    <p>The direct labeling of the ready-to-use PSMA-11 kit with the <sup>68</sup>GaCl<sub>3</sub> eluted from the ITG generator was evaluated by HPLC immediately after lyophilization and after 40 days of kit storage at −20˚C. The radiolabeling took place at room temperature for 10 minutes and the final pH of the reaction mixture was 4.5. The radiochemical purity was &gt; 95% at HPLC analyses “<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref>”.</p>
    <p>The radiolabeling of ready-to-use PSMA-11 kit with gallium-68 obtained from Eckert &amp; Ziegler generator, was evaluated by radio-TLC scanner, after approximately 45 days of storage at −20˚C. All labelings were performed at room temperature for 10 minutes and the final pH of the reaction mixture was 4.0 in this case. The radiochemical purity was &gt; 95% evaluated by TLC “<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>”.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_4">
    <title>4.4. PSMA-I&amp;T Radiolabeling with <sup>177</sup>Lu</title>
    <p>Radiolabeling of PSMA-I&amp;T with lutetium-177 resulted in radiochemical purity &gt; 95% without purification. The SA was 718.9 GBq/mg. The retention time</p>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 2. Chromatograms representative of ready-to-use PSMA-11 kit radiolabeled with Ga-68. (a) Analysis conducted immediately after lyophilization. (b) After 40 days of storage at −20˚C. Waters C18 column; mobile phase (a): water (0.1% TFA), (b): acetonitrile (0.1% TFA). Relative areas of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 and impurities are reported within the figure as percentages of the total areas (ROI: %).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4100096-rId21.jpeg?20240626034106" />
    </fig>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-"></xref>Table 1. Radiochemical purity of the lyophilized PSMA-11 kits labeling with <sup>68</sup>GaCl<sub>3</sub> solution from the Eckert &amp; Ziegler generator. Analysis by radio-TLC scanner and ammonium acetate/methanol 1:1. (n = 2).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="aleft" width="25.13%"><p style="text-align:left">PSMA-11 precursor</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="74.87%" colspan="3"><p style="text-align:left">Radiochemical purity and final pH</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="31.10%"><p style="text-align:left">Final formulation pH</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="18.04%"><p style="text-align:left">TLC (%)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="25.73%"><p style="text-align:left">Acceptance criteria: TLC* (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Lyophilized kit <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-1">
          [1]
         </xref></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="31.10%"><p style="text-align:center">4.0</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.04%"><p style="text-align:center">99.9 ± 0.1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.73%"><p style="text-align:center">≥95.0</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-1">
      [1]
     </xref> Lyophilized kit—PSMA-11/ mannitol; *TLC—Thin layer chromatography.</p>
    <p>was similar to the cold peptide determined by HPLC with identification of a single peak corresponding to the product of interest.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_5">
    <title>4.5. Biological Evaluation</title>
    <p>The integrity and preservation of PSMA-11 affinity post-lyophilization were evaluated in a competitive binding assay with the human prostate carcinoma cell line LNCaP-PSMA + (2 × 10<sup>5</sup> cells/well), 1-hour incubation at 4˚C with <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-I&amp;T (5 nM) as the radioligand and lyophilized, unlabeled PSMA-11 (75 nM) as the competitor. The experiment demonstrated the binding of <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-I&amp;T, being 1712.08 ± 63.03 fmol without competitor and 1010.54 ± 243.49 fmol with competitor “<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref>”.</p>
    <p>A significant difference was observed between the uptake of <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-I&amp;T without the competitor and with the competitor (P = 0.0320, P &lt; 0.05), which confirms the preservation of PSMA-11 affinity for the receptor after one month of lyophilization procedure.</p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 3. Competition assay in LNCaP-PSMA+ cells, employing <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-I&amp;T (5 nM) as the ligand and PSMA-11 (75 nM) as competitor, RPMI 1640 medium + 10% fetal bovine serum, 1-hour incubation at 4˚C. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3 for each condition).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4100096-rId22.jpeg?20240626034106" />
    </fig>
    <p>In the in vivo competition experiment using <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-I&amp;T and lyophilized PSMA-11 as competitor, a reduction in tumor uptake was observed from 2.18 ± 0.27 %ID/g to 0.62 ± 0.17 %ID/g, representing a decrease in the tumor uptake rate by 71.56% “<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>”.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-"></xref>Table 2. Biodistribution of <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-I&amp;T with and without administration of 100 µg/animal of reconstituted lyophilized PSMA-11 (competitor), 30 minutes prior to the radiotracer. Both groups of animals were euthanized 60 minutes post-injection. Data expressed as mean and standard deviation (n = 5).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="aleft" width="27.78%"><p style="text-align:left">Biological material</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="74.78%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:left">IA%/gram of organ or tissue or/mL of blood</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="40.59%"><p style="text-align:left">60 minutes without</p><p style="text-align:left">competitor</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td aleft" width="34.19%"><p style="text-align:left">60 minutes with</p><p style="text-align:left">competitor</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="27.78%"><p style="text-align:center">Blood</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="40.59%"><p style="text-align:center">0.69 ± 0.21</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="34.19%"><p style="text-align:center">1.19 ± 0.38</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.78%"><p style="text-align:center">Lungs</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="40.59%"><p style="text-align:center">1.72 ± 0.37</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.19%"><p style="text-align:center">2.12 ± 0.70</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.78%"><p style="text-align:center">Spleen</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="40.59%"><p style="text-align:center">0.89 ± 1.10</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.19%"><p style="text-align:center">0.39 ± 0.09</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.78%"><p style="text-align:center">Liver</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="40.59%"><p style="text-align:center">0.87 ± 0.64</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.19%"><p style="text-align:center">0.72 ± 0.20</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.78%"><p style="text-align:center">Kidneys</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="40.59%"><p style="text-align:center">86.60 ± 2.75</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.19%"><p style="text-align:center">7.37 ± 0.91</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.78%"><p style="text-align:center">Intestines</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="40.59%"><p style="text-align:center">0.91 ± 0.79</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.19%"><p style="text-align:center">0.90 ± 0.59</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.78%"><p style="text-align:center">Muscle</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="40.59%"><p style="text-align:center">0.96 ± 0.47</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.19%"><p style="text-align:center">0.65 ± 0.42</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.78%"><p style="text-align:center">Tumor</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="40.59%"><p style="text-align:center">2.18 ± 0.27</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="34.19%"><p style="text-align:center">0.62 ± 0.17</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>% IA/g = percentage of activity injected per gram or per mL of blood.</p>
    <p>Additionally, renal uptake was strongly reduced by the presence of the lyophilized PSMA-11 competitor, with the reduction in renal uptake from 97.68 ± 19.24 %ID/g to 7.99 ± 1.59 %ID/g (***P ≤ 0.001) “<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
      Figure 4
     </xref>”. Conversely, the percentage of the radiopharmaceutical in circulation increased in the blocking group, a fact that also reflects the competition established between the lutetium-177 radiopharmaceutical and the competitor (lyophilized PSMA-11) for PSMA receptors on tumor cells.</p>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 4. Biodistribution of <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-I&amp;T with and without administration of 100 µg/animal of reconstituted lyophilized PSMA-11 (competitor) 30 minutes prior to the radiotracer. Data expressed as mean and standard deviation (n = 5). Asterisks denote significance (***p ≤ 0.001).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/4100096-rId23.jpeg?20240626034106" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Discussion</title>
   <p>One of the main challenges in developing lyophilized formulations (kits) for labeling with <sup>68</sup>GaCl<sub>3</sub> is related to the fact that generators with GMP-grade purity from different manufacturers diverge in terms of matrix composition, volume, and concentration of hydrochloric acid (HCl) solution used for generator elution. The <sup>68</sup>Ge/<sup>68</sup>Ga ITG generator is eluted with a volume of 4 mL of 0.05 M HCl, while Eckert &amp; Ziegler generator is eluted with 7 mL of 0.1 M HCl. In the formulation study, it was demonstrated that 1 mL of 1.5 M sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) maintained the desired pH between 4 to 5 for the evaluated eluate volumes from both commercial GMP-grade generators. This buffer volume can also be increased to consider larger volumes of eluate generators in radiolabeling procedures. PSMA-11 peptide should be lyophilized without the presence of the labeling buffer. The results of collapsed cake when the peptide was lyophilized in presence of the buffer were consistent with data found in the literature regarding the impact of lyophilization and extreme freezing on the pH of protein-buffered solutions, which can lead to protein denaturation with the possibility of generating irreversible aggregates <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-27">
     [27]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Furthermore, buffer freeze-drying tests employing Red of Congo indicator revealed the change in buffer pH during the freeze-drying cycle. Therefore, in the proposed kit developed in this work, the buffer will be supplied in liquid form, in an additional vial. Mannitol was proposed in the kit formulation as a volume agent, thereby providing substantial bulk to the formulation. In cases where concentrations of the active ingredient are very low, mannitol prevents the loss of peptide mass during the lyophilization process. Mannitol is also considered a good choice as a tonicity modifier in developing an isotonic formulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-16">
     [16]
    </xref>. Crystalline volume agents like mannitol yield a visually appealing cake, intact, with uniform consistency and good mechanical properties <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-17">
     [17]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Based on critical temperature characterization studies, the lyophilization cycle was designed to achieve a freezing temperature of around −40˚C and primary drying at 2˚C (3˚C below T<sub>eut</sub>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-20">
     [20]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-28">
     [28]
    </xref>. It has been demonstrated that <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 can be obtained from the ready-to-use kit with radiochemical purity exceeding 95%, using the eluate of <sup>68</sup>Ga from the ITG or Eckert &amp; Ziegler <sup>68</sup>Ge/<sup>68</sup>Ga GMP generators without previous purification, at room temperature, with the final labeling pH 4.0 to 4.5. These results, enabled by the acyclic radiometal chelator HBED-CC, are in accordance with the concept of a ready-to-use labeling kit. The presence of peaks with “shoulders” in the HPLC profiles for the radiolabeling at room temperature is attributed to the presence of diastereoisomers in the reaction mixture and is consistent with data reported by other researchers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-5">
     [5]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. The formation of approximately 50% of the thermodynamically less stable diastereoisomer in the reaction mixture does not reduce specific cellular uptake of PSMA (binding), and thus, does not have any negative influence on the quality of PET images <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.134078-5">
     [5]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>The presence of mannitol in the labeling medium did not interfere with the binding of Gallium-68 to PSMA-11, as evidenced by the HPLC profiles of the radiolabeling of the lyophilized formulation. Results from in vitro and in vivo biological competition studies confirmed the preservation of PSMA-11 affinity for the receptor after lyophilization, showing that the freeze-drying process evaluated preserved the integrity and biological properties of PSMA-11 peptide, ensuring radiolabeling efficiency.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>6. Conclusion</title>
   <p>A lyophilized ready-to-use PSMA-11 kit formulation was successfully obtained, preserving the peptide’s integrity and ensuring high radiolabeling yield. The PSMA-11 kit, consisting of two vials (a lyophilized vial containing the peptide in mannitol and a vial with labeling buffer solution), can be directly radiolabeled with <sup>68</sup>Ga eluted from two different generators (ITG and Eckert &amp; Ziegler). This represents a fast and easily prepared method for the radiopharmaceutical for clinical application. The use of mannitol allowed the creation of an elegant lyophilized cake, contributing to the preservation of peptide mass and integrity under lyophilization conditions.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s7">
   <title>Research Involving Animals</title>
   <p>The male SCID-BALB/c mice (BALB/c immunodeficient mice resulting from genetic modification), used in this study, aged four to five weeks, and weighing 18 to 25 grams, were provided by the animal facility at IPEN-CNEN/SP (São Paulo, SP, Brazil). All experiments were previously approved by the Research Ethics Committee of IPEN (Project No. 225/18/CEUA-IPEN/SP) and conducted in accordance with the standards established by the Brazilian Society of Science in Laboratory Animals (SBCAL) and the National Council for Animal Experimentation Control (CONCEA). The animals were housed in the animal facility under the following breeding conditions: room temperature (22˚C ± 2˚C), artificial lighting with a 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle, and ad libitum access to food and water.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s8">
   <title>Funding</title>
   <p>This study was funded by the Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) (FAPESP process number—2019/04172-7).</p>
  </sec><sec id="s9">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>The author thanks the National Commission of Nuclear Energy, CNEN, and the University of São Paulo (USP) for the scholarships and financial support granted during the Ph.D. This project was developed in the radiopharmacy laboratories of the Nuclear and Energy Research Institute (IPEN), located in São Paulo, Brazil. The authors thank the Nuclear Medicine team at Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein for providing the Ga-68 eluate from the Eckert &amp; Ziegler generator.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s10">
   <title>List of Abbreviations</title>
   <p><sup>68</sup>Ga—Gallium-68</p>
   <p><sup>68</sup>Ge—Germanium-68</p>
   <p>DSC—Differential scanning calorimetry</p>
   <p>FDA—Food and drug administration</p>
   <p>GBq—Giga-becquerel</p>
   <p>GMP—Good manufacturing practice</p>
   <p>HCl—Hydrochloric acid</p>
   <p>PC—Prostate cancer</p>
   <p>PET—Positron emission tomography</p>
   <p>PSMA—Prostate-specific membrane antigen</p>
   <p>SA—Specific activity</p>
   <p>T<sub>eu</sub>—Eutectic temperature</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msubsup> 
       <mtext>
         T 
       </mtext> 
       <mtext>
         g 
       </mtext> 
       <mo>
         ' 
       </mo> 
      </msubsup> 
     </mrow> 
    </math>—Glass transition temperature</p>
   <p>TLC—Thin layer chromatography</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     James, N.D., Tannock, I., N’Dow, J., Feng, F., Gillessen, S., Ali, S.A., et al. (2024) The Lancet Commission on Prostate Cancer: Planning for the Surge in Cases. The Lancet, 403, 1683-1722. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00651-2
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Privé, B.M., Janssen, M.J.R., van Oort, I.M., Muselaers, C.H.J., Jonker, M.A., de Groot, M., et al. (2020) Lutetium-177-PSMA-I&amp;T as Metastases Directed Therapy in Oligometastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer, a Randomized Controlled Trial. BMC Cancer, 20, Article No. 884. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07386-z
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mokaleng, B.B., Ebenhan, T., Ramesh, S., Govender, T., Kruger, H.G., Parboosing, R., et al. (2015) Synthesis,
     <sup>68</sup>Ga-Radiolabeling, and Preliminary in vivo Assessment of a Depsipeptide-Derived Compound as a Potential PET/CT Infection Imaging Agent. BioMed Research International, 2015, Article ID: 284354. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/284354
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ruigrok, E.A.M., van Vliet, N., Dalm, S.U., de Blois, E., van Gent, D.C., Haeck, J., et al. (2020) Extensive Preclinical Evaluation of Lutetium-177-Labeled PSMA-Specific Tracers for Prostate Cancer Radionuclide Therapy. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 48, 1339-1350. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05057-6
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hennrich, U. and Eder, M. (2021) [
     <sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11: The First FDA-Approved 
     <sup>68</sup>Ga-Radiopharmaceutical for PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer. Pharmaceuticals, 14, Article 713. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14080713
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Satpati, D., Shinto, A., Kamaleshwaran, K.K., Sane, S. and Banerjee, S. (2016) Convenient Preparation of [
     <sup>68</sup>Ga]DKFZ-PSMA-11 Using a Robust Single-Vial Kit and Demonstration of Its Clinical Efficacy. Molecular Imaging and Biology, 18, 420-427. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-016-0943-z
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Eder, M., Schäfer, M., Bauder-Wüst, U., Hull, W., Wängler, C., Mier, W., et al. (2012) 
     <sup>68</sup>Ga-Complex Lipophilicity and the Targeting Property of a Urea-Based PSMA Inhibitor for PET Imaging. Bioconjugate Chemistry, 23, 688-697. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1021/bc200279b
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Eder, M., Schäfer, M., Bauder-Wüst, U., Haberkorn, U., Eisenhut, M. and Kopka, K. (2014) Preclinical Evaluation of a Bispecific Low-Molecular Heterodimer Targeting Both PSMA and GRPR for Improved PET Imaging and Therapy of Prostate Cancer. The Prostate, 74, 659-668. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.22784
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mercanoglu, G., Zilbeyaz, K. and Arslan, N. (2023) Synthesis and Ready to Use Kit Formulation of EDTMP for the Preparation of 177Lu-EDTMP as a Bone Palliation Radiopharmaceutical. Current Radiopharmaceuticals, 16, 38-43. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2174/1874471015666220721095938
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kleynhans, J., Rubow, S., le Roux, J., Marjanovic-Painter, B., Zeevaart, J.R. and Ebenhan, T. (2020) Production of [
     <sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA: Comparing a Manual Kit-Based Method with a Module-Based Automated Synthesis Approach. Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals, 63, 553-563. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/jlcr.3879
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Beheshti, M., Paymani, Z., Brilhante, J., Geinitz, H., Gehring, D., Leopoldseder, T., et al. (2018) Optimal Time-Point for 
     <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Imaging in Assessment of Prostate Cancer: Feasibility of Sterile Cold-Kit Tracer Preparation? European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 45, 1188-1196. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-3970-y
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lepareur, N. (2022) Cold Kit Labeling: The Future of 
     <sup>68</sup>Ga Radiopharmaceuticals? Frontiers in Medicine, 9, Article 812050. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.812050
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Meisenheimer, M., Kürpig, S., Essler, M. and Eppard, E. (2020) Manual vs Automated 
     <sup>68</sup>Ga-Radiolabelling—A Comparison of Optimized Processes. Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals, 63, 162-173. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/jlcr.3821
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Romero, E., Martínez, A., Oteo, M., Ibañez, M., Santos, M. and Morcillo, M.Á. (2020) Development and Long-Term Evaluation of a New 
     <sup>68</sup>Ge/
     <sup>68</sup>Ga Generator Based on Nano-SnO
     <sub>2</sub> for PET Imaging. Scientific Reports, 10, Article No. 12756. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69659-8
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nelson, B.J.B., Andersson, J.D., Wuest, F. and Spreckelmeyer, S. (2022) Good Practices for 
     <sup>68</sup>Ga Radiopharmaceutical Production. EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry, 7, Article No. 27. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s41181-022-00180-1
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Carpenter, J.F., Chang, B.S., Garzon-Rodriguez, W. and Randolph, T.W. (2002) Rational Design of Stable Lyophilized Protein Formulations: Theory and Practice. In: Carpenter, J.F. and Manning, M.C., Eds., Rational Design of Stable Protein Formulations. Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Vol. 13, Springer, 109-133.&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0557-0_5
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Shukla, S. (2011) Freeze Drying Process: A Review. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 2, 3061-3068. &gt;https://ijpsr.com/
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Badal Tejedor, M., Fransson, J. and Millqvist-Fureby, A. (2020) Freeze-Dried Cake Structural and Physical Heterogeneity in Relation to Freeze-Drying Cycle Parameters. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 590, Article 119891. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119891
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tang, X. and Pikal, M.J. (2004) Design of Freeze-Drying Processes for Pharmaceuticals: Practical Advice. Pharmaceutical Research, 21, 191-200. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1023/b:pham.0000016234.73023.75
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wang, W. (2000) Lyophilization and Development of Solid Protein Pharmaceuticals. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 203, 1-60. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-5173(00)00423-3
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mukherjee, A., Pandey, U., Chakravarty, R., Sarma, H.D. and Dash, A. (2014) Development of Single Vial Kits for Preparation of 
     <sup>68</sup>Ga-Labelled Peptides for PET Imaging of Neuroendocrine Tumours. Molecular Imaging and Biology, 16, 550-557. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-014-0719-2
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tworowska, I., Ranganathan, D., Thamake, S., Delpassand, E., Mojtahedi, A., Schultz, M.K., et al. (2016) Radiosynthesis of Clinical Doses of 
     <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE (Galiomedix
     <sup>TM</sup>) and Validation of Organic-Matrix-Based 
     <sup>68</sup>Ge/
     <sup>6</sup>
     <sup>8</sup>Ga Generators. Nuclear Medicine and Biology, 43, 19-26. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2015.08.004
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Prince, D., Rossouw, D., Davids, C. and Rubow, S. (2017) Development and Evaluation of User-Friendly Single Vial DOTA-Peptide Kit Formulations, Specifically Designed for Radiolabelling with 
     <sup>68</sup>Ga from a Tin Dioxide 
     <sup>68</sup>Ge/
     <sup>68</sup>Ga Generator. Molecular Imaging and Biology, 19, 817-824. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-017-1077-7
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines&amp;HealthCare (2024) Gallium (
     <sup>68</sup>Ga) Chloride Solution for Radiolabelling. European Pharmacopoeia 11.0, 1273-1274.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Weineisen, M., Simecek, J., Schottelius, M., Schwaiger, M. and Wester, H. (2014) Synthesis and Preclinical Evaluation of DOTAGA-Conjugated PSMA Ligands for Functional Imaging and Endoradiotherapy of Prostate Cancer. EJNMMI Research, 4, Article No. 63. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-014-0063-1
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wieczorek Villas Boas, C.A., de Jesus Silva, J., Pereira Dias, L.A., Brandão Freire, M.R., Balieiro, L.M., Ferreira dos Santos, C.S., et al. (2022) In vitro and in vivo Response of PSMA-617 Radiolabeled with CA and NCA Lutetium-177. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 180, Article 110064. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2021.110064
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kolhe, P., Amend, E. and Singh, S.K. (2009) Impact of Freezing on pH of Buffered Solutions and Consequences for Monoclonal Antibody Aggregation. Biotechnology Progress, 26, 727-733. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.377
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.134078-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Awotwe-Otoo, D., Agarabi, C., Read, E.K., Lute, S., Brorson, K.A., Khan, M.A., et al. (2013) Impact of Controlled Ice Nucleation on Process Performance and Quality Attributes of a Lyophilized Monoclonal Antibody. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 450, 70-78. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.04.041
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>