<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    msce
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2327-6045
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2327-6053
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/msce.2024.126002
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    msce-133976
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Chemistry 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Materials Science
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Feasibility Analysis of the Sintering Flue Gas Oxidation Method for Denitrification Technology Route
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Weiling
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Chu
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Linling
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Wu
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Jing
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Yuan
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"> 
      <sup>3</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Qianfeng
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Zhang
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aInstitute of Molecular Engineering and Applied Chemistry, Anhui University of Technology, Ma’anshan, China
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Civil Engineering, Tongling University, Tongling, China
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff3">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Civil Engineering, Manitoba University, Winnipeg, Canada
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     14
    </day> 
    <month>
     06
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    12
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    06
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    12
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    23
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      11,
     </day>
     <month>
      May
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      21,
     </day>
     <month>
      May
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      21,
     </day>
     <month>
      June
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    With the vigorous development of China’s iron and steel industry and the introduction of ultra-low emission policies, the emission of pollutants such as SO
    <sub>2</sub> and NOx has received unprecedented attention. At present, the commonly used denitrification methods include selective catalytic reduction (SCR), active coke, etc. As a newly developed denitrification technology, oxidation denitrification is not widely used, and the technical level is mixed, and there might be problems such as yellow smoke, secondary pollution and ozone escape in the practical application. In this paper, problems existing in the denitrification process of sintering flue gas oxidation are analyzed, and a 320 m
    <sup>2</sup> sintering machine is taken as an example. Comparing the denitrification technology of sintering industry, it could be seen that the denitrification technology route of oxidation method has low pollution, low cost and high comprehensive environmental benefits, and has greatly potential development.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Sintering
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Air Pollution
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Denitration by Oxidation
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>The frequent occurrence of haze weather has become the focus of our people’s attention, nitrogen oxides (NO<sub>X</sub>) emission is one of the main factors causing haze, which is a serious hazard to the environment and human health, NO<sub>X</sub> is emitted into the atmosphere in addition to the haze that may be caused by ozone hole, acid rain and photochemical pollution and other atmospheric pollution problems <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-1">
     [1]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. The sources of NO<sub>X</sub> can be divided into industrial sources, living sources and mobile sources, in which NO<sub>X</sub> emitted from living sources and mobile sources is more dispersed and not easy to deal with, whereas NO<sub>X</sub> emitted from industrial sources is more centralized and easy to control and deal with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-3">
     [3]
    </xref>, and it is known from the statistical results of China’s Environmental Statistics Yearbook that the total amount of NO<sub>X</sub> emitted from industry is much higher than that emitted from life, and there exists a lot of room for reduction, so that the reduction of the main way to reduce the emission of air pollutants is to control the emission of NO<sub>X</sub> from the industry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-4">
     [4]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-5">
     [5]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. The iron and steel industry is the largest pollutant emitter, but the iron and steel industry does not have any mature application of denitrification technology at present <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-7">
     [7]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-"></xref>The iron and steel industry is the pillar industry of China’s national economy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-8">
     [8]
    </xref>. In 2023, China’s crude steel output was 1019 million tons, ranking the first in the world, accounting for more than 50% of the global total output. At the same time, the iron and steel industry is the key emission sources of air pollution, and the problems such as long industrial chain, complex process and huge resource consumption are difficult to solve <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-9">
     [9]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-10">
     [10]
    </xref>. In addition, environmental pollutants such as SO<sub>2</sub>, NOx, particulate matter, heavy metals and dioxins are also produced during the operation of the steel-making system <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-11">
     [11]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-12">
     [12]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-13">
     [13]
    </xref>. The main pollutant emission of iron and steel industry has exceeded that of electric power industry and become the largest pollutant emission source of industrial sector <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-14">
     [14]
    </xref>. In consequence, the relevant policies and standards issued by the government for the iron and steel industry become increasingly strict, and the pressure faced by the iron and steel industry is greater than ever before.</p>
   <p>Sintering flue gases are of great interest in the processes of the iron and steel industry due to their complex properties such as large gas fluctuations, its complex nature such as huge gas fluctuations and temperature fluctuations and temperature fluctuations, high water and oxygen content. In order to meet the ultra-low emission standards, sintering flue gas purification technologies are emerging.</p>
   <p>The denitrification technologies for sintering flue gas can be mainly classified as SCR, activated carbon technology, and ozone oxidation-absorption. Compared with the other two desulfurization technologies, Ozone oxidation denitrification has been increasingly used due to its advantages of synergistic multi-pollutant control, water conservation, and low investment in equipment.</p>
   <p>Ozone oxidation with liquid phase absorption desulfurization and denitrification is actually divided into two steps to achieve the purpose of denitrification <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-15">
     [15]
    </xref>, firstly using oxidants to oxidize NO to soluble high-valent NO<sub>2</sub> or N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>, and then using the existing desulfurization equipment to achieve the reduction and absorption of high-valent nitrogen oxides through certain optimization <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-16">
     [16]
    </xref>. The oxidation of NO to NO<sub>2</sub> can be achieved by a variety of oxidizing agents, such as commonly used ozone, chlorine dioxide, sodium chlorite, etc <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-17">
     [17]
    </xref>. The oxidizing agent has a high utilization rate and good selectivity for NO, and the oxidation rate of NO can be close to 100% <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-18">
     [18]
    </xref>, and at the same time, intermediate products can be used to efficiently remove the dioxin-like substances in the flue gas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-19">
     [19]
    </xref>. Compared with the selective catalytic reduction method and the activated carbon method, the ozone oxidation adsorption method has the advantages of high oxidation selectivity, high oxidation efficiency and no secondary by-products. This technology will deeply oxidize NO to NO<sub>3</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>, thus significantly improving the denitrification efficiency. This technology can significantly improve the denitrification efficiency and successfully solve the problem that the traditional ozone oxidation and co-absorption technology cannot realize the ultra-low emission.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Ozone Oxidation Synergistic Liquid Phase Absorption Desulfurization and Denitrification Key Technology and Equipment</title>
   <p>Gas-phase ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) oxidation synergized with liquid-phase absorption for desulfurization and denitrification involves gas-phase Oxidation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-20">
     [20]
    </xref>, liquid-phase absorption and reduction of three processes: the first ozone is added to the flue mixer, so that the flue gas and ozone are fully mixed and oxidation reaction; flue gas into the absorption tower, in the liquid-phase absorption tower to achieve simultaneous absorption of SO<sub>2</sub>, NOx and other pollutants with high efficiency, O<sub>3</sub>/NO molar ratio of 1.5 - 2.0, denitrification products into the sintering process of reduction treatment.</p>
   <p>Since the diffusion ability of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> dissolved in the gas phase and water is comparable to the ability to dissolve in aqueous solution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-21">
     [21]
    </xref>, simultaneous high-efficiency desulfurization and denitrification can be achieved in the same absorption tower. SO<sub>2</sub>, heavy metal pollutants are also oxidized by O<sub>3</sub>, degraded to low toxicity or easy to absorb and remove the material.</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-"></xref>The process flow is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
     Figure 1
    </xref>, O<sub>3</sub> is injected into the flue before the absorption tower through the injection mixer and mixed with the flue gas to oxidize NO<sub>3</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> in depth. O<sub>3</sub> is added to the flue before the absorption tower through the mixer and mixed with the flue gas to oxidize NO to NO<sub>3</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>, and then the flue gas enters into the absorption tower to realize simultaneous desulfurization and denitrification with the absorbing liquid. The purified flue gas is dusted and discharged, so that both sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides meet the control requirements of ultra-low emission. The wastewater is treated harmlessly and the nitrate component is reduced to N<sub>2</sub> in the blast furnace.</p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-"></xref>In comparison to SCR and activated carbon method, ozone oxidation-absorption shows the advantages of high oxidation selectivity, high oxidation efficiency, and no secondary byproducts <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-22">
     [22]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-23">
     [23]
    </xref>.</p>
   <fig id="fig1" position="float">
    <label>Figure 1</label>
    <caption>
     <title>Figure 1. Ozone oxidation synergistic liquid phase absorption desulfurization and denitrification process flow.</title>
    </caption>
    <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1741286-rId12.jpeg?20240624092310" />
   </fig>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Analysis of Denitration by Oxidation Method</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Yellow Smoke Problem</title>
    <p>The yellow smoke problem is the oxidation product NO<sub>2</sub> has not been effectively reduced or absorbed. Because NO<sub>2</sub> is a red-brown gas, obvious yellow color could appear when the emission concentration of NO<sub>2</sub> in the flue gas exceeds 30 mg/m<sup>3</sup>. This problem occurs in imperfect oxidation and denitrification engineering, which is for supervision and regulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-24">
      [24]
     </xref>. Generally, the oxidation method of denitrification with yellow smoke phenomenon cannot achieve ultra-low emission levels, and it is also the “false denitrification” project that has been questioned the most, especially in the case of wet desulfurization, it is advisable to use peroxide method to oxidize NO to N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>, which could solve the problem of yellow smoke and actual emission exceeding the standard due to low absorption efficiency of NO<sub>2</sub> in conventional desulfurization system. It can also be solved by using the special denitrification agent absorption tower to greatly improve the absorption efficiency, and the oxidation denitrification method combined with semi-dry desulfurization has a low initial concentration of nitrogen oxides (&lt;150 mg/m<sup>3</sup>), the route of initial oxidation to NO<sub>2</sub> could be adopted, under which conditions cheaper oxidants (such as chlorine dioxide <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-25">
      [25]
     </xref>, sodium chlorite <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-26">
      [26]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-27">
      [27]
     </xref>, etc.) might be considered to reduce construction and operating costs.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Secondary Pollution of Absorbed Products</title>
    <p>Nitrate has a positive effect on the application of wet desulfurization gypsum and semi-dry desulfurization ash in building materials’ industry, improving the thermal insulation capacity of the material, and applied to other occasions to determine whether there is secondary pollution, nitric acid and nitrite in wet desulfurization wastewater if improper disposal will pollute the water body, the desulfurization wastewater of sintering machine using such denitrification technology should not be used for slag washing. It can be added to a mixture for consumption and utilization. From the perspective of laboratory irrigation mechanism analysis and practical engineering application, most of the decomposition products of nitric acid and nitrite carried in wastewater in the sintering machine production process are nitrogen, which does not cause the initial concentration of nitrogen oxides to be enriched and increased, and the secondary pollution problem can be completely avoided and solved.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Ozone Escape Pollution Problem</title>
    <p>The greatest risk of ozone escape lies in the ozone generator workshop rather than the flue gas, and the ozone that does not participate in the reaction will quickly decompose into oxygen in the high humidity reducing atmosphere in the desulfurization tower, which theoretically does not produce secondary pollution, unless there is serious flue gas bias in the desulfurization tower design. Therefore, under the condition that excessive ozone injection does not cause secondary pollution, the problem of large fluctuations in flue gas parameters of the sintering machine can be effectively solved. After measuring several peroxide demonstration projects, ozone cannot be detected by ppm level instruments in the chimney position, while a very small amount of ozone can be detected by ppb level instruments, almost within the error range of 0 points. Ozone has been applied in China’s water treatment industry for many years, the equipment is all domestic, and there are also perfect preventive measures for workshop escape.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. Nitrogen Balance and Conversion Rate</title>
    <p>In the process of denitrification by oxidation method, NO in the flue gas is first oxidized to NO<sub>2</sub> or N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>, and all kinds of oxidants can achieve oxidation efficiency of more than 96%. There are two reactions of reduction and absorption of oxidation products in the desulfurization system, mainly reduction reaction. The difficulty of analysis of nitrogen element balance is that the part reduced to nitrogen cannot be measured. Therefore, in the actual nitrogen balance analysis process, the nitrogen element outlet is lower than the nitrogen element inlet, and this part of the difference is the part that is converted into nitrogen. The same problem exists in other denitrification technical routes. The proportion of nitrogen converted by different projects is also different, which is affected by the concentration of sulfur dioxide in the flue gas, the oxygen content, the temperature and the water content of the flue gas.</p>
    <p>The process of ozone oxidation combined with semi-dry absorption reduction denitrification is to quickly and evenly mix ozone after the dust collector, oxidize the vast majority of NO in the flue gas to NO<sub>2</sub>, and then reduce and absorb NO<sub>2</sub> in the semi-dry desulfurization tower, using sulfurized and absorption accelerator to produce N<sub>2</sub> and calcium nitrite, so as to achieve the purpose of denitrification. In the actual production process, the initial concentration of nitrogen oxides (calculated as NO<sub>2</sub>) in a single sintering machine is 220 mg/m<sup>3</sup> as an example. The smoke volume is 900,000 Nm<sup>3</sup>/h, and the desulfurization agent is about 1.8 t/h, and the desulfurization ash is about 2.5 t/h, and the denitrification agent is about 60 kg/h. The molar ratio of ozone to nitrogen oxides is 1.25, and under this condition, the main oxidation product is NO<sub>2</sub>, which cannot form higher nitrogen oxides.</p>
    <p>The whole process involves a reaction pathway as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref> below, where oxygen generates ozone with oxidizing properties through an ionization reaction in the ozone generator, and ozone generates NO<sub>2</sub> with NO through a gas-phase reaction in the flue gas, the whole reaction being a stepwise reaction. The process was illustrated by the following Equations.</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <msub> 
        <mtext>
          O 
        </mtext> 
        <mn>
          3 
        </mn> 
       </msub> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <mtext>
         NO 
       </mtext> 
       <mo>
         → 
       </mo> 
       <msub> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           NO 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
       </msub> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <msub> 
        <mtext>
          O 
        </mtext> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
       </msub> 
      </mrow> 
     </math>(1)</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <msub> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           NO 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
       </msub> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <msub> 
        <mtext>
          H 
        </mtext> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
       </msub> 
       <mtext>
         O 
       </mtext> 
       <mo>
         → 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <msup> 
        <mtext>
          H 
        </mtext> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
       </msup> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <msubsup> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           NO 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
       </msubsup> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <msubsup> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           NO 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
        <mn>
          3 
        </mn> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
       </msubsup> 
      </mrow> 
     </math>(2)</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <msub> 
        <mtext>
          H 
        </mtext> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
       </msub> 
       <mtext>
         O 
       </mtext> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <msubsup> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           NO 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
        <mn>
          3 
        </mn> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
       </msubsup> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         5 
       </mn> 
       <msubsup> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           SO 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
        <mn>
          3 
        </mn> 
        <mrow> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mo>
           − 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </msubsup> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <mtext>
         accelerator 
       </mtext> 
       <mo>
         → 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         5 
       </mn> 
       <msubsup> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           SO 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
        <mn>
          4 
        </mn> 
        <mrow> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mo>
           − 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </msubsup> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <msub> 
        <mtext>
          N 
        </mtext> 
        <mn>
          2 
        </mn> 
       </msub> 
       <mo>
         + 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         2 
       </mn> 
       <msup> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           OH 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
       </msup> 
      </mrow> 
     </math>(3)</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-"></xref>The oxidized gas enters the semi-dry fluidizer bed desulfurization and denigration undergoes the fluidizer lime trapping and high pressure spray humidification and efficiency enhancement reaction. During this process, excess O<sub>3</sub> is reduced to O<sub>2</sub> on the surface of porous solid powder, NO<sub>2</sub> is finally formed into N<sub>2</sub> under the action of OH<sup>−</sup>, stabilizer and accelerator, and 
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <msubsup> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           SO 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
        <mn>
          3 
        </mn> 
        <mrow> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
         <mo>
           − 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </msubsup> 
      </mrow> 
     </math> in the liquid phase plays the main role of reaction. NO<sub>2</sub> in the fluidizer lime and gentrifying agent to participate in the subsequent chemical reaction, and ultimately most of the NO<sub>2</sub> is reduced to N<sub>2</sub>, generating a very small amount of nitrate and nitrite. This mechanism approach has been verified by the mechanism test of Professor Tianle Zhu’s <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-28">
      [28]
     </xref> research group (chromatographic verification as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref> below) and engineering practice (as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref>). As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3(a)">
      Figure 3(a)
     </xref>, the peak time of N<sub>2</sub> under the corresponding column was determined by testing, and as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3(b)">
      Figure 3(b)
     </xref>, 20 - 40 min was the optimal time for denitrification, and with the increase of time, the denitrification capacity gradually decreased and less N<sub>2</sub> was produced. Comprehensive detection of high-temperature catalytic reduction NOx was carried out on the flue gas at the tail of the sintering system, and the total amount of NOx was always maintained below 50 mg/nm<sup>3</sup>, and the desulfurization gypsum ion detection met the requirements of ultra-low emission NOx emission.</p>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 2. Mechanism reaction of denitration process.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1741286-rId21.jpeg?20240624092310" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 3. NO<sub>2</sub> absorption process N migration.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/1741286-rId23.jpeg?20240624092310" />
    </fig>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-"></xref>Table 1. Comparison of samples tested.Table 1. Comparison of samples tested.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Sample name</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.03%"><p style="text-align:center">Test item</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="50.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Detection method and data</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.20%"><p style="text-align:center">Detection result (m/m%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="5" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.92%"><p style="text-align:center">Desulfurized gypsum</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.03%"><p style="text-align:center">CaCO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="50.84%"><p style="text-align:center">GB/T 5484-2012 Gypsum chemical analysis</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.20%"><p style="text-align:center">80.4</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.03%"><p style="text-align:center">CaSO<sub>4</sub> (based on SO<sub>3</sub>)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.84%"><p style="text-align:center">GB/T 5484-2012 Gypsum chemical analysis</p><p style="text-align:center">11Barium sulfate gravimetry</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.20%"><p style="text-align:center">9.12</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.03%"><p style="text-align:center">CaSO<sub>3</sub></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="50.84%"><p style="text-align:center">GB/T 5484-2012 Gypsum chemical analysis</p><p style="text-align:center">12iodometry</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.20%"><p style="text-align:center">ND</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.03%"><p style="text-align:center">nitrate</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="50.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Determination of nitrate and nitrite in soil by ion chromatography</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.20%"><p style="text-align:center">0.15</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.03%"><p style="text-align:center">nitrite</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.20%"><p style="text-align:center">0.22</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-"></xref>Table 2. The size distribution of gypsum is shown in the table below.Table 2. The size distribution of gypsum is shown in the table below.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.82%"><p style="text-align:center">Mesh number</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.26%"><p style="text-align:center">Aperture mm</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="27.78%"><p style="text-align:center">Granularity um</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="32.14%"><p style="text-align:center">Cumulative percentage %</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.82%"><p style="text-align:center">0 - 20 mesh</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.26%"><p style="text-align:center">&gt;0.85</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="27.78%"><p style="text-align:center">&gt;842 μm</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="32.14%"><p style="text-align:center">0.06</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.82%"><p style="text-align:center">20 - 40 mesh</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.26%"><p style="text-align:center">0.425 - 0.850</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.78%"><p style="text-align:center">430 m - 850 μm</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="32.14%"><p style="text-align:center">0.05</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.82%"><p style="text-align:center">40 - 60 mesh</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.26%"><p style="text-align:center">0.250 - 0.425</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.78%"><p style="text-align:center">260 m - 450 μm</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="32.14%"><p style="text-align:center">0.11</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.82%"><p style="text-align:center">60 - 80 mesh</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.26%"><p style="text-align:center">0.180 - 0.250</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.78%"><p style="text-align:center">180 - 260 μm</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="32.14%"><p style="text-align:center">0.09</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.82%"><p style="text-align:center">80 - 100 mesh</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.26%"><p style="text-align:center">0.150 - 0.180</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.78%"><p style="text-align:center">160 - 190 μm</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="32.14%"><p style="text-align:center">0.31</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.82%"><p style="text-align:center">&gt;100 mesh</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.26%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt;0.150</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.78%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt;160 μm</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="32.14%"><p style="text-align:center">98.32</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-"></xref>Table 3. Remark information.Table 3. Remark information.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.06%"><p style="text-align:center">remark</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="108.05%"><p style="text-align:left">“ND” indicates that the detection result is lower than the method detection limit and is not detected.</p><p style="text-align:left">Only responsible for incoming samples, test results are only for research, teaching or internal quality purposes.</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>In the process of oxidation combined with semi-dry absorption and denitrification, the input of nitrogen element comes from NO in the flue gas after the dust collector, and the total input nitrogen element (nitrogen is not calculated) is: (equations number)</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mtext>
         N 
       </mtext> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mtext>
         V 
       </mtext> 
       <mo>
         * 
       </mo> 
       <mtext>
         c 
       </mtext> 
       <mo>
         * 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mn>
           14 
         </mn> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          / 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mn>
           46 
         </mn> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         48.7 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           kg 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          / 
        </mo> 
        <mtext>
          h 
        </mtext> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </math>(4)</p>
    <p>----V Smoke flow rate</p>
    <p>----c Nitrogen oxide concentration</p>
    <p>The nitrogen outlet consists of three parts, which are the residual emission of nitrogen oxides in the flue gas, nitrogen generated by the reaction of NO<sub>2</sub> and denitrification agent, and calcium nitrite (calcium nitrate) in desulfurization ash. Due to the high concentration of nitrogen in the flue gas itself, the nitrogen part cannot be detected and can only be analyzed through balance.</p>
    <p>According to the field measurement, the average concentration of nitrogen oxides in the final emission of flue gas calculated as NO<sub>2</sub> is 15 mg/m<sup>3</sup>, so the nitrogen element of this part is calculated as:</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mtext>
         N 
       </mtext> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mtext>
         V 
       </mtext> 
       <mo>
         * 
       </mo> 
       <mtext>
         c 
       </mtext> 
       <mo>
         * 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mn>
           14 
         </mn> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          / 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mn>
           46 
         </mn> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         3.65 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           kg 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          / 
        </mo> 
        <mtext>
          h 
        </mtext> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </math>(5)</p>
    <p>The initial total nitrogen ratio was a1 = 3.65/48.7*100% = 7.5%.</p>
    <p>The calcium nitrate content of the desulfurization ash is less than 2%, and at 2%, an average of 2 tons of desulfurization ash is produced per hour, so this fraction of nitrogen is calculated as:</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mtext>
         N 
       </mtext> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mtext>
         G 
       </mtext> 
       <mo>
         * 
       </mo> 
       <mtext>
         c 
       </mtext> 
       <mo>
         * 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mn>
           28 
         </mn> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          / 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mn>
           132 
         </mn> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         8.5 
       </mn> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mtext>
           kg 
         </mtext> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          / 
        </mo> 
        <mtext>
          h 
        </mtext> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </math>(6)</p>
    <p>The initial total nitrogen ratio is a2 = 8.5/48.7*100% = 17.5%.</p>
    <p>According to the decrement method, the nitrogen element of this part is:</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mtext>
         a 
       </mtext> 
       <mn>
         3 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         1 
       </mn> 
       <mo>
         − 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         7.5 
       </mn> 
       <mi>
         % 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         − 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         17.5 
       </mn> 
       <mi>
         % 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mn>
         75 
       </mn> 
       <mi>
         % 
       </mi> 
      </mrow> 
     </math></p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Comparison of Denitrification Technologies in the Sintering Industry (Taking 300 m<sup>2</sup> Sintering Machine as an Example) (As Shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
     Table 4
    </xref>)</title>
   <table-wrap id="table4">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133976-"></xref>Table 4. Comparison of denitration technology in sintering industry.Table 4. Comparison of denitration technology in sintering industry.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.96%"><p style="text-align:center">Comparative content</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="27.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Oxidative denitration</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.41%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">SCR</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="23.24%"><p style="text-align:center">Activated carbon/Coke</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.96%"><p style="text-align:center">Construction cost (ten thousand Yuan)</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="27.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Dampening method: 8000</p><p style="text-align:center">Drying method: 4000</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.41%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Dampening method: 8000</p><p style="text-align:center">Drying method: 6000</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.24%"><p style="text-align:center">12,000</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.96%"><p style="text-align:center">Construction period</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="27.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Moderate duration, fast interface, Small footprint, flexible location</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="28.41%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Construction period and interface moderate, small footprint, fixed position</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="23.24%"><p style="text-align:center">The construction period is long and the area is large</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.96%"><p style="text-align:center">Demand temperature interval</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="27.39%"><p style="text-align:center">80 - 150 can be used</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="28.41%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">&gt;200, Stable and efficient, requires a high temperature</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="23.24%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt;160, Active coke safety limits</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.96%"><p style="text-align:center">System resistance</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="27.39%"><p style="text-align:center">100 pa, No booster fan required</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="28.25%"><p style="text-align:center">Around 2000 pa, a booster fan is needed</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="23.40%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Over 3000 pa</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.96%"><p style="text-align:center">Consumable material</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="27.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Ammonia (power consumption, low pollution during preparation)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="28.25%"><p style="text-align:center">Ammonia, coal, catalyst (high pollution during preparation)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="23.40%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Active coke, catalyst (high pollution during preparation)</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.96%"><p style="text-align:center">Operating cost (Yuan/tonne of ore)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="27.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Dampening method: 8 - 16</p><p style="text-align:center">Drying method: 4 - 4</p><p style="text-align:center">Depending on whether peroxide is required</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="28.25%"><p style="text-align:center">10 - 20 (including electricity, heating medium, catalyst replacement)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="23.40%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">&gt;30</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.96%"><p style="text-align:center">denitrification efficiency</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="27.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Stabilized ultra-low &lt; 30</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="28.25%"><p style="text-align:center">Stabilized ultra-low &lt; 30</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="23.40%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Difficulty in stabilizing compliance</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.96%"><p style="text-align:center">byproduct material</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="27.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Wastewater solids and liquids that can be handled (sinter blends, flue spray drying, building materials, no secondary releases)</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="28.25%"><p style="text-align:center">Catalyst hazardous waste</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="23.40%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Enolic acid, heavy metal-containing activated carbon powder</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.96%"><p style="text-align:center">Hazardous gas escape</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="27.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Ozone overdose escape, stable &lt; 0.1 ppm, low sulfur dioxide oxidation degree of follow-up equipment can be efficiently controlled</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="28.25%"><p style="text-align:center">The fluctuating characteristics of the flue gas determine the problem of ammonia escape, which is difficult to solve, even exceeding the NOx emission concentration</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="23.40%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Ammonia escape is difficult to resolve and particulate emissions exceed standards</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.96%"><p style="text-align:center">stability</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="27.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Flexible and stable start/stop and adjustment</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="28.25%"><p style="text-align:center">Difficult to adapt to fluctuations in operating conditions, must be over-injected ammonia</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="23.40%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Difficult to adapt to fluctuations in operating conditions, must be over-injected ammonia</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="20.96%"><p style="text-align:center">Synergistic removal capability</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="27.39%"><p style="text-align:center">Ultra-low dioxin, complete oxidative degradation</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="28.25%"><p style="text-align:center">Dioxins have adsorption and cleavage efficiencies that gradually decline</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="23.40%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Ultra-low dioxin, adsorption, secondary treatment required</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Conclusions</title>
   <p>The above analysis shows that the perfect implementation of oxidative denitrification is a very suitable technical route for denitrification of sintering machine, compared with other technical routes, it has the great advantages of low cost, small secondary pollution, high comprehensive environmental benefits, and its problems have a reliable solution to the problems, the recent report of the National Air Pollution Causes Group has also clearly pointed out the shortcomings of the SCR technical route, and made it clear that ammonia escape has a great influence on the atmosphere. The recent report of the National Air Pollution Causes Group has also clearly pointed out the shortcomings of the SCR technology route, and made it clear that ammonia escape is a great danger to atmospheric particulate matter and ozone pollution.</p>
   <p>With the requirement of ultra-low emission of sintering flue gas being put on the agenda, the traditional denitrification and desulfurization technologies have been difficult to meet the requirements. Through the summarization of this paper, it is found that O<sub>3</sub> oxidation combined with semi-dry method for denitrification of sintering flue gas is the main trend of industrial flue gas treatment application in the future. The process is in line with the sustainable development concept of energy saving and emission reduction. The technology has been successfully applied in the iron and steel sintering industry, and in the future, it can be further popularized and applied to the flue gas treatment of cement, glass, ceramics, non-electric coal-fired boilers and other non-electricity industries, which has a broad market application prospect.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>Data Availability</title>
   <p>The data used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s7">
   <title>Acknowledgments</title>
   <p>The paper was partially supported by Anhui University Excellent Research and Innovation Project (No. 2022AH010094). Authors appreciate the reviewers for their invaluable comments which have led to significant improvement in the paper.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cheng, T., Zhou, X., Yang, L., Sun, Z. and Wu, H. (2020) Emission Characteristics of Soluble Ions in Fine Particulates in Limestone-Gypsum Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization System. Energy&amp;Fuels, 34, 3836-3842. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b04512
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Shen, Z., Guo, S., Kang, W., Zeng, K., Yin, M., Tian, J., et al. (2012) Kinetics and Mechanism of Sulfite Oxidation in the Magnesium-Based Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization Process. Industrial&amp;Engineering Chemistry Research, 51, 4192-4198. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1021/ie300163v
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bao, J., Yang, L., Sun, W., Geng, J., Yan, J. and Shen, X. (2011) Removal of Fine Particles by Heterogeneous Condensation in the Double-Alkali Desulfurization Process. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 50, 828-835. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2011.05.008
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Skalska, K., Miller, J.S. and Ledakowicz, S. (2012) Intensification of No
     <sub>x </sub>Absorption Process by Means of Ozone Injection into Exhaust Gas Stream. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 61, 69-74. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2012.06.007
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhang, Y., Zheng, Y., Wang, X. and Lu, X. (2015) Preparation of Mn-FeO
     <sub>x</sub>/CNTs Catalysts by Redox Co-Precipitation and Application in Low-Temperature NO Reduction with Nh
     <sub>3</sub>. Catalysis Communications, 62, 57-61. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2014.12.023 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhang, L., Zhang, D., Zhang, J., Cai, S., Fang, C., Huang, L., et al. (2013) Design of meso-TIO
     <sub>2</sub>@MnO
     <sub>x</sub>-CeO
     <sub>x</sub>/CNTs with a Core-Shell Structure as Denox Catalysts: Promotion of Activity, Stability and So
     <sub>2</sub>-Tolerance. Nanoscale, 5, 9821-9829. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1039/c3nr03150k
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Guo, J., Li, Y., Xiong, J. and Zhu, T. (2020) Coupling Mechanism of Activated Carbon Mixed with Dust for Flue Gas Desulfurization and Denitrification. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 98, 205-214. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.06.002
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wang, Y., Jin, S., Li, J., Zhou, J., Zhang, L., Wang, J., et al. (2017) Investigation of the Fine Structure Around the Copper Site in Copper/zinc Superoxide Dismutase by XANES Combined with ab initio Calculations. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 137, 88-92. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.03.003
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jia, J., Cheng, S., Yao, S., Xu, T., Zhang, T., Ma, Y., et al. (2018) Emission Characteristics and Chemical Components of Size-Segregated Particulate Matter in Iron and Steel Industry. Atmospheric Environment, 182, 115-127. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.03.051
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mele, M. and Magazzino, C. (2020) A Machine Learning Analysis of the Relationship among Iron and Steel Industries, Air Pollution, and Economic Growth in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 277, Article ID: 123293. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123293
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bo, X., Li, Z., Qu, J., Cai, B., Zhou, B., Sun, L., et al. (2020) The Spatial-Temporal Pattern of Sintered Flue Gas Emissions in Iron and Steel Enterprises of China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, Article ID: 121667. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121667
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhang, X., Gao, S., Fu, Q., Han, D., Chen, X., Fu, S., et al. (2020) Impact of VOCs Emission from Iron and Steel Industry on Regional O
     <sub>3</sub> and PM
     <sub>2.5</sub> Pollutions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 28853-28866. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09218-w
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zou, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, X., Zhu, T., Tian, M. and Cai, M. (2020) Simultaneous Removal of NO
     <sub>x</sub> and SO
     <sub>2</sub> Using Two-Stage O
     <sub>3</sub> Oxidation Combined with Ca(OH)
     <sub>2</sub> Absorption. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 37, 1907-1914. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-020-0597-z
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Liu, F., Cai, M., Liu, X., Zhu, T. and Zou, Y. (2021) O
     <sub>3</sub> Oxidation Combined with Semi-Dry Method for Simultaneous Desulfurization and Denitrification of Sintering/Pelletizing Flue Gas. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 104, 253-263. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.11.021
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cai, M., Liu, X., Zhu, T., Zou, Y., Tao, W. and Tian, M. (2020) Simultaneous Removal of SO
     <sub>2</sub> and No Using a Spray Dryer Absorption (SDA) Method Combined with O
     <sub>3</sub> Oxidation for Sintering/Pelleting Flue Gas. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 96, 64-71. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.04.018
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhang, W., Wu, S. and Hu, Z. (2020) Analysis of Operational Parameters Affecting Denitrification Rate of Sintering Flue Gas in Cross-Flow Activated Coke Purification Facility. Journal of Iron and Steel Research International, 27, 887-897. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s42243-020-00440-x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wu, Z., Chen, Z., Wang, H., Liu, H. and Wei, Z. (2023) Arsenic Removal in Flue Gas through Anaerobic Denitrification and Sulfate Reduction Cocoupled Arsenic Oxidation. Chemosphere, 337, Article ID: 139350. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139350
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ma, L., Duan, X., Wu, J., Li, J., Peng, L., Wang, L., et al. (2022) Simultaneous Desulfurization and Denitrification of Flue Gas Enabled by Hydrojet Cyclone. Journal of Cleaner Production, 377, Article ID: 134205. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134205
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Shen, Z., Xing, X., Wang, S., Zheng, Z. and Lv, M. (2023) Low Temperature Co Oxidation from Sintering Flue Gas on CuO-CeO
     <sub>2</sub>/AC-Fe Catalyst. Catalysis Today, 423, Article ID: 113988. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2022.12.019
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Han, Z., Zou, T., Wang, J., Dong, J., Deng, Y. and Pan, X. (2020) A Novel Method for Simultaneous Removal of NO and SO
     <sub>2</sub> from Marine Exhaust Gas via In-Site Combination of Ozone Oxidation and Wet Scrubbing Absorption. Journal of Marine Science Engineering, 8, 943-964. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8110943
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Liu, S., Liu, Z., Zhu, H., Wang, Z., Guo, J., Zhang, X., et al. (2023) The Roles of Red Mud as Desulfurization and Denitrification in Flue Gas: A Review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 11, Article ID: 109770. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2023.109770
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zou, Y., Liu, X., Zhu, T., Tian, M., Cai, M., Zhao, Z., et al. (2019) Simultaneous Removal of NO
     <sub>x</sub> and SO
     <sub>2</sub> by Mgo Combined with O
     <sub>3</sub> Oxidation: The Influencing Factors and O
     <sub>3</sub> Consumption Distributions. ACS Omega, 4, 21091-21099. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b02502
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Li, B., Wu, H., Liu, X., Zhu, T., Liu, F. and Zhao, X. (2020) Simultaneous Removal of SO
     <sub>2</sub> and No Using a Novel Method with Red Mud as Absorbent Combined with O
     <sub>3</sub> Oxidation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 392, Article ID: 122270. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122270
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gao, F., Tang, X., Yi, H., Zhao, S., Li, C., Li, J., et al. (2017) A Review on Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO
     <sub>x</sub> by NH
     <sub>3</sub> over Mn-Based Catalysts at Low Temperatures: Catalysts, Mechanisms, Kinetics and DFT Calculations. Catalysts, 7, Article 199. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/catal7070199
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Johansson, J., Heijnesson Hultén, A., Ajdari, S., Nilsson, P., Samuelsson, M., et al. (2018) Gas-Phase Chemistry of the NO-SO
     <sub>2</sub>-CLO
     <sub>2</sub> System Applied to Flue Gas Cleaning. Industrial&amp;Engineering Chemistry Research, 57, 14347-14354. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b03067
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Han, Z., Lan, T., Han, Z., Yang, S., Dong, J., Sun, D., et al. (2019) Simultaneous Removal of NO and SO
     <sub>2</sub> from Exhaust Gas by Cyclic Scrubbing and Online Supplementing pH-Buffered Naclo
     <sub>2</sub> Solution. Energy&amp;Fuels, 33, 6591-6599. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b01106 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hao, R., Mao, X., Qian, Z., Zhao, Y., Wang, L., Yuan, B., et al. (2019) Simultaneous Removal of SO
     <sub>2</sub> and NO Using a Novel Method of Ultraviolet Irradiating Chlorite-Ammonia Complex. Environmental Science&amp;Technology, 53, 9014-9023. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b06950
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133976-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sun, Y., Fan, W., Zhu, T. and Hong, X. (2017) Effect of Cao on NO
     <sub>x</sub> Reduction by Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction under Variable Gas Compositions in a Simulated Cement Precalciner Atmosphere. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14, Article 1474. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121474
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>