<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    nm
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Neuroscience and Medicine
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2158-2912
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2158-2947
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/nm.2024.152008
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    nm-133934
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Medicine 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Healthcare
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Description of Post-Stroke Cognitive Disorders at Abidjan University Hospitals, Côte d’Ivoire
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       N’guessan N’cho
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Arthur
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Kouassi Kouamé
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Léonard
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Ouattara
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Niemtiah
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Tako Neme
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Antoine
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aBiology and Health Laboratory, Felix Houphouët-Boigny University, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Neurology CHU Yopougon, Felix Houphouët-Boigny University, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     11
    </day> 
    <month>
     05
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    15
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    02
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    92
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    105
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      12,
     </day>
     <month>
      April
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      17,
     </day>
     <month>
      April
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      17,
     </day>
     <month>
      June
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    Stroke patients often experience motor deficits and cognitive problems after a stroke. Objective: To improve our understanding of the cognitive consequences of stroke. Method: a descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study was conducted over 12-month period in the neurology departments of the Cocody and Treichville Hospitals in Côte d’Ivoire. Results: Out of 724 patients admitted to the neurology department, 415 (57.32%) were stroke patients, of which 145 (34.94%) were screened. The frequency of global cognitive functioning impairment was 86.21%, significantly higher than the frequency of patients without impairment, which was 13.79%. The study focused on detailing the cognitive status of stroke patients in neurology departments, assessing several cognitive functions during the subacute phase of stroke. These functions included global cognitive functioning, executive functions, language and memory. The frequency of post-stroke cognitive impairment is high among stroke patients in Abidjan. This frequency is comparable to figures found in Subsaharian stroke populations. Demographic and clinical characteristics studied included age, gender, education level, employment status, vascular diseases and cerebral affected area. Among these characteristics, only the education level and the cerebral affected area have been found significant. Conclusion: The incidence of cognitive impairment after a stroke is significantly high among stroke patients in Abidjan.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Cognitive Disorders
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Subacute Stroke
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Related Risk Factors
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Stroke is a major public health problem worldwide. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-1">
     [1]
    </xref>, stroke is the most common neurological disorder in developed countries, where it is the leading cause of acquired non-traumatic physical disability, the second leading cause of dementia after Alzheimer’s disease, and the third leading cause of death after myocardial infarction and cancer. A major cause of depression among patients and their families is the cost of care, estimated at 2.4% of total healthcare expenditure worldwide. Post-stroke cognitive dysfunction is the second most common cause of severe neurocognitive impairment after Alzheimer’s disease (AD) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-2">
     [2]
    </xref>. Despite the significant consequences, such as poorer prognosis in terms of vitality and function, cognitive deficits after stroke are poorly understood. The consequences of these disorders lead to a significant risk of disability and subsequent institutionalization in most developed countries <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-3">
     [3]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. Researchers have shown that cognitive symptoms after stroke are frequent in the acute phase (around 80% of surviving patients), and persist in 38% to 73% of cases <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-5">
     [5]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. However, this symptomatology is often neglected compared to other possible deficits (motor and/or sensory) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-7">
     [7]
    </xref>. In the least developed countries, the impact of cognitive disorders is still poorly assessed because they are not a priority in national health programs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-8">
     [8]
    </xref>. In Côte d’Ivoire, as in less developed countries, data on post-stroke cognitive disorders are still insufficient. Our study is designed to contribute to a better understanding of cognitive disorders after stroke. In the present study, we determine the frequency and the risk factors related to the cognitive status of post-stroke patients treated in the neurology department of the University Hospitals of Cocody and Treichville (Côte d’Ivoire).</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Method</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Setting of the Study</title>
    <p>This study describes the cognitive status of post-stroke patients seen in the neurology departments of the university hospital centers of Cocody and Treichville (Côte d’Ivoire). It is a cross-sectional and analytical study that lasted 12 months (from September 2020 to September 2021), excluding the month of June.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Method Description</title>
    <p>We screened different cognitive functions (global cognitive functioning, executive functions, language and memory) among stroke patients. We determined the frequencies of patients with impaired functions and non-impaired functions. We first of all determined the frequencies of patients with global cognitive functioning impairment and patients without global cognitive functioning impairment by demographic characteristics (age group, gender, educational level, employment status) and by clinical characteristics (vascular diseases, and indexed stroke). For age group, we categorize patients into 2 groups: young (inferior to 65 years) and old (superior to 65 years). About gender, we categorize patients into 2 groups: men and women. Regarding educational level, patients were divided into 3 groups: low level (less than 7 years of education); medium level (less than 14 years of education); high level (at least 14 years of education). For employment status, patients were divided into 3 groups (public, private and liberal employment). Clinical characteristics were concerned with hypertension, diabetes, and cardiopathy for vascular diseases. The injured hemisphere and affected area were taken into account for indexed stroke. We then determined related stroke risk factors according to demographic and clinical characteristics of stroke patients by significant p-value.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Inclusion Criteria</title>
    <p>Subjects included in the study were:</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_4">
    <title>2.4. Technical Equipment</title>
    <p>The cognitive status of the patients was assessed using the following psychometric tests:</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_5">
    <title>2.5. Statistical Analysis</title>
    <p>Statistical tests were performed using R. Associations between variables were analyzed using the Chi square test. Binary logistic regression was used to identify possible risk factors for cognitive impairment after stroke. Graphs were presented using Excel 2019.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-"></xref>3. Results</title>
   <p>During the period of the study, 724 patients were hospitalized. Among them, 309 patients (42.68%) were admitted for diverse neurological pathologies and 415 stroke patients (57.32%) were enrolled in the study. The latter’s were selected based on selection criteria. Eventually, 145 patients (34.94%) aged 30 to 87 years were evaluated as shown by the flowchart (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
     Figure 1
    </xref>).</p>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Frequencies of Different Cognitive Functions</title>
    <p>The frequency of patients with global cognitive functioning impairments was significantly higher (86.21%) than that of patients without impairment (13.79%). Global cognitive functioning is highly impaired after stroke. The frequency of</p>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 1. Flowchart of the studied population.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2400538-rId12.jpeg?20240620034935" />
    </fig>
    <p>patients with executive function problems was 81.38% against 18.62% without the problem. Executive functions are highly impaired after stroke. The frequency of patients with impaired language was 54.48%. However, 45.52% of the stroke patients were not impaired. Language is moderately affected after a stroke. The frequency of short-term memory disorders was 34.48% and that of the working memory disorders was 24.83%. On the contrary, the frequency of patients without short-term memory disorders was 65.52% and the patients without working memory disorders were 75.17%. Our figures suggest that short-term memory disorders and working memory disorders are not frequent after a stroke.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Overall Cognitive Functioning Status of Patients According to Socio-Demographic Characteristics</title>
    <p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
      Figure 2
     </xref>, the frequency of elderly patients with global cognitive functioning impairment was 95%, which was higher than the frequency of young patients, which was 82.86%.</p>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-"></xref>Figure 2. Distribution of patients’ overall cognitive functioning by age group. The frequency of patients with global cognitive functioning impairment was higher in older patients (95%) than in younger patients (82.86%).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2400538-rId13.jpeg?20240620034935" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Overall Cognitive Functioning Status of Patients According to Clinical Characteristics</title>
    <p>The frequency of patients with hypertension and GCFI was higher (88.63%) than those without hypertension (82.45%). The frequency of patients with diabetes and GCFI was higher (90%) than those without diabetes (85.6%). The frequency of patients with cardiopathy and GCFI was higher (90%) than those without cardiopathy (85.92%).</p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-"></xref>Figure 3. Distribution of patients’ global cognitive functioning by gender. The frequency of patients with global cognitive functioning impairment was higher in men (90.48%) than in women (82.93%).</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2400538-rId14.jpeg?20240620034937" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 4. Distribution of patients’ overall cognitive functioning by level of education. The frequency of patients with problems in overall cognitive functioning was higher in patients with a low level of education than in patients with a medium level of education and a high level of education.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2400538-rId15.jpeg?20240620034937" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. Related Risk Factors</title>
    <p>The p-values for age group, gender and employment status were not significant. Age, sex and employment status have no effect on the onset of global cognitive impairment. The p-value is significant for educational level. The level of education therefore had an effect on the onset of global cognitive impairment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>The p-values are not significant. Hypertension, diabetes and cardiopathy had no effect on the occurrence of cognitive functioning impairment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>).</p>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-"></xref>Figure 5. Distribution of global cognitive functioning according to working status. The frequency of patients with impaired global cognitive functioning was higher in patients with liberal status than in patients with private and public status.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2400538-rId16.jpeg?20240620034938" />
    </fig>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-"></xref>Table 1. Sociodemographic risk factors.Table 1. Sociodemographic risk factors.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="28.57%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Variables</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="27.53%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">GCFI</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">OR</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="12.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Chi 2</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="1" class="acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">P value</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Yes (n = 125)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="13.24%"><p style="text-align:center">No (n = 20)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Age group</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.74%"><p style="text-align:center">Old</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">38</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.24%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">3.93 [0.86 - 17.79]</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.90%"><p style="text-align:center">3.59186</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.058066</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.74%"><p style="text-align:center">Young</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">87</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="13.24%"><p style="text-align:center">18</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Gender</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.74%"><p style="text-align:center">Women</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">68</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.24%"><p style="text-align:center">14</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">1.95 [0.71 - 5.42]</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.90%"><p style="text-align:center">1.70767</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.191292</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.74%"><p style="text-align:center">Men</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">57</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="13.24%"><p style="text-align:center">6</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="3" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Educational</p><p style="text-align:center">level</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.74%"><p style="text-align:center">Low</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">59</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.24%"><p style="text-align:center">4</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="3" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.90%"><p style="text-align:center">10.5276</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="3" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.005177**</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.74%"><p style="text-align:center">Medium</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">53</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.24%"><p style="text-align:center">9</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.74%"><p style="text-align:center">High</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">13</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="13.24%"><p style="text-align:center">7</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="3" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Employment status</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.74%"><p style="text-align:center">Public</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">14</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.24%"><p style="text-align:center">4</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="3" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.90%"><p style="text-align:center">2.23869</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="3" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.326497</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.74%"><p style="text-align:center">Private</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">22</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.24%"><p style="text-align:center">5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.74%"><p style="text-align:center">Liberal</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">89</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.24%"><p style="text-align:center">11</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="18.51%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-"></xref>(5% significance level). *significant, **very significant. The p-values for age group, gender and employment status were not significant. Age, gender and employment status have no effect on the onset of global cognitive impairment. The p-value is significant for educational level. The level of education therefore has an effect on the onset of global cognitive functioning impairment. GCFI: global cognitive functioning impairment.</p>
    <p>1) Hemorrhagic stroke</p>
    <p>The odds ratio shows that patients injured on the left hemisphere are likely to present GCFI 4 times in comparison to patients injured on the right hemisphere. But the p-value is not significant. Either left or right hemisphere injury had no effect on the occurrence of global cognitive functioning impairment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>The odds ratio shows that patients injured on the left hemisphere are 4.16 times</p>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-"></xref>Table 2. Vascular diseases risk factors.Table 2. Vascular diseases risk factors.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="35.71%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Variables</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.57%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">GCFI</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="17.86%"><p style="text-align:center">OR</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center">Chi 2</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="1" class="acenter" width="8.92%"><p style="text-align:center">P value</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Yes (n = 125)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">No (n = 20)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Hypertension</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.43%"><p style="text-align:center">Without hypertension</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">47</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">10</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.86%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.92%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.43%"><p style="text-align:center">With hypertension</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">78</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">10</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.86%"><p style="text-align:center">1.92 [0.70 - 5.30]</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.92%"><p style="text-align:center">0.20039</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Diabetes</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.43%"><p style="text-align:center">Without diabetes</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">107</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">18</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.86%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.92%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.43%"><p style="text-align:center">With diabetes</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">18</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.86%"><p style="text-align:center">1.52 [0.35 - 10.64]</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.92%"><p style="text-align:center">0.61108</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">Cardiopathy</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.43%"><p style="text-align:center">Without cardiopathy</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">116</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">19</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.86%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.92%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.43%"><p style="text-align:center">With cardiopathy</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">9</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.86%"><p style="text-align:center">1.61 [0.26 - 31.20]</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.92%"><p style="text-align:center">0.66021</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-"></xref>(5% significance level). The p-values are not significant. Hypertension, diabetes and heart disease had no effect on the occurrence of global cognitive functioning impairment.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-"></xref>Table 3. Risk factors of indexed stroke (hemorrhagic stroke).Table 3. Risk factors of indexed stroke (hemorrhagic stroke).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="30.76%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Variables</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.17%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">GCFI</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="19.64%"><p style="text-align:center">OR</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center">Chi2</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="1" class="acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">P value</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="15.67%"><p style="text-align:center">Yes (n = 55)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">No (n = 10)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.79%"><p style="text-align:center">Injured</p><p style="text-align:center">Hemisphere</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.97%"><p style="text-align:center">Right</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.67%"><p style="text-align:center">34</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">4</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.64%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="13.97%"><p style="text-align:center">Left</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.67%"><p style="text-align:center">21</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">6</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.64%"><p style="text-align:center">0.24 [0.04 - 1.14]</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.088937</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.79%"><p style="text-align:center">Affected area</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="13.97%"><p style="text-align:center">Lobar</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.67%"><p style="text-align:center">10</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">6</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.64%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="13.97%"><p style="text-align:center">Deep</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.67%"><p style="text-align:center">45</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.64%"><p style="text-align:center">9.61 [2.07 - 56.45]</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.005731**</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-"></xref>(5% significance level). *significant, **very significant. The p-value is very significant for the deep area. The deep area lesion is associated with the occurrence of global cognitive functioning impairment.</p>
    <p>less likely to have global cognitive functioning impairment than patients injured on the right hemisphere. Moreover, the p-value is very significant (0.005731). The deep area lesion is associated with the occurrence of post-stroke cognitive functioning impairment. Patients with a deep lesion are 9.61 times more likely to have global cognitive functioning impairment than those with a lobar lesion (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>2) Ischemic stroke</p>
    <p>The odds ratio shows that patients injured on the left hemisphere are 1.34 times more likely to have global cognitive functioning impairment than patients injured on the right hemisphere. However, the p-value is not significant. Either left or right hemisphere injury had no effect on the occurrence of global cognitive functioning impairment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref>).</p>
    <p>The odds ratio value shows that patients with a deep lesion are 1.87 times more likely to have impaired global cognitive functioning than patients with a lesion in the MCA area. Patients with a lesion in the PCA area are 57.1 times less likely to have impaired global cognitive functioning than patients with a lesion in the MCA area. In addition, the p-value is significant (0.0480493). The lesion located in the posterior cerebral artery area is associated to the occurrence of global cognitive functioning impairment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref>).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table4">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
       Table 4
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-"></xref>Table 4. Risk factors of indexed stroke (ischemic stroke).Table 4. Risk factors of indexed stroke (ischemic stroke).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="25.01%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Variables</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="26.78%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">GCFI</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="26.78%"><p style="text-align:center">OR</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center">Chi2</p></td> 
       <td rowspan="1" class="acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">P value</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">Yes (n = 70)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td custom-top-td acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">No (n = 10)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.61%"><p style="text-align:center">Injured</p><p style="text-align:center">Hemisphere</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.40%"><p style="text-align:center">Right</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">37</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">6</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="26.78%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.40%"><p style="text-align:center">Left</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">33</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">4</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="26.78%"><p style="text-align:center">1.34 [0.32 - 6]</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.6850554</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="4" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.61%"><p style="text-align:center">Affected area</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.40%"><p style="text-align:center">MCA</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">46</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">6</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="26.78%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">-</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.40%"><p style="text-align:center">ACA</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">6</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">0</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.78%"><p style="text-align:center">5.51 × 10<sup>6</sup> [1.46 × 10<sup>−51</sup>]</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.9923178</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.40%"><p style="text-align:center">PCA</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.78%"><p style="text-align:center">1.75 × 10<sup>−1</sup> [3 × 10<sup>−1</sup> - 1.06]</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0480493*</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.40%"><p style="text-align:center">Deep</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">14</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.29%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="26.78%"><p style="text-align:center">1.87 [2.8 × 10<sup>−1</sup> - 37]</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.93%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.5776079</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-"></xref>(5% significance level). *significant, **very significant. MCA: middle cerebral artery, ACA: anterior cerebral artery, PCA: posterior cerebral artery. The p-value is significant for the PCA. The lesion located in posterior cerebral artery area is associated to the occurrence of global cognitive functioning impairment.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Discussion</title>
   <p>In our study, 81.38% of patients had problems with executive function and 54.48% had problems with language. Vidović et al. found that language deficits after stroke are common, affecting up to 80% of patients, and may regress with appropriate rehabilitation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-14">
     [14]
    </xref>. Our results showed a frequency of 34.48% and 24.83% for disorders of short-term memory and working memory, respectively. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-15">
     [15]
    </xref>, about 30% develop memory problems in the year after stroke. Our study found 86.21% cognitive impairment. Other studies have also found around 80% impairment after stroke <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-6">
     [6]
    </xref>. Burton and al., estimated that 80% would be impaired in the acute phase <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-16">
     [16]
    </xref>. In foreign developed countries, a cross-sectional Chinese study conducted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-17">
     [17]
    </xref> in Changsha (China) had a frequency of 41, 8%. A cross-sectional study conducted in India by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-18">
     [18]
    </xref> revealed a frequency of 66, 66%. Another Chinese study on post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI), revealed an overall prevalence of 80.97% <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-19">
     [19]
    </xref>. A study conducted in Indonesia by Pinzon et al revealed a frequency of 68.2% <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-20">
     [20]
    </xref>. According to Jokinen and collaborators, 83% of patients showed impairment in at least one cognitive domain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-21">
     [21]
    </xref>. In comparison, the frequencies of PSCI in reported studies in various countries move away from each other’s. The frequency observed in our study remains higher, but it is not so far from those of studies conducted in African developing countries. Studies similar to ours have been conducted in Ghana by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-22">
     [22]
    </xref>, in Nigeria by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-23">
     [23]
    </xref>, Uganda by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-24">
     [24]
    </xref>. These authors found frequencies of 72.8%, 67.4%, and 66.4%. The higher frequency in our study may be due to when the patients were assessed. In our study, patients were assessed in the subacute stage (at least 5 days after stroke), while in the studies mentioned, patients were assessed in the post-acute phase (at least 3 months after stroke). Timing of cognitive assessment is crucial for accurate diagnosis, as retested scores often show improvements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-25">
     [25]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-26">
     [26]
    </xref>. Some studies reported that cognitive problems continue to stabilise and even improve beyond the first 3 months after stroke <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-27">
     [27]
    </xref>. Moreover, we performed assessment with the MoCA test, while authors of studies named above used the MMSE. Incidentally, Zhao and colleagues have shown that the MoCA is more sensitive to mild cognitive impairment than the MMSE <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-28">
     [28]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Although our study did not find a significant effect of age on the risk of cognitive impairment after stroke (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
     Table 1
    </xref>), other studies show that age influences cognitive decline after stroke. Age is a risk factor for both stroke and cognitive decline. There is evidence that cognitive decline after stroke increases with age after 65 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-29">
     [29]
    </xref>. Our study did not find that gender had a significant effect on the onset of cognitive impairment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
     Table 1
    </xref>). Others researchers showed that gender was not identified as a factor associated with the onset of post-stroke cognitive impairment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-30">
     [30]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-31">
     [31]
    </xref>. In some studies, gender is linked to post-stroke cognitive issues <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-32">
     [32]
    </xref>. Our research reveals education impacts cognitive function. High education levels protect against cognitive decline after a stroke <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-22">
     [22]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-33">
     [33]
    </xref>. Indeed, a higher level of education increases the brain’s cognitive reserve, which may lead to better compensation for ageing and brain damage <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-34">
     [34]
    </xref>. Some authors found education level doesn’t impact cognitive decline. Singh-Manoux, Zahodne &amp; colleagues studied education’s effect on cognition in 7454 Whitehall II &amp; 1023 Victoria Longitudinal Study participants <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-35">
     [35]
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-36">
     [36]
    </xref>. Both studies suggested that there was no significant difference of the rate of decline in cognitive function between each group of the education level. The education level is a conflictive risk factor. It could influence the expression of the cognitive impairment in patients. The cohort study conducted by Elbaz and collaborators, on 4010 participants suggested the higher education was associated with better cognitive performances <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-37">
     [37]
    </xref>. Our study did not show that employment status was related to cognitive impairment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
     Table 1
    </xref>). Yet, there is evidence suggesting that the occupation have effects on the prevalence of the cognitive impairment. Singh-Manoux and collaborators also suggested that the individuals with high occupations that were defined as the administrative positions had a more obvious cognitive decline than other occupations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-35">
     [35]
    </xref>. Another study conducted by Douiri and collaborators, proposed a higher prevalence of cognitive impairment after ischemic stroke in the manual workers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-38">
     [38]
    </xref>. Our study did not show that vascular diseases risk factors i.e. hypertension, diabetes, cardiopathy were related to post-stroke cognitive functioning impairment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
     Table 2
    </xref>). On the contrary, a study has shown the effect of those factors on post-stroke cognitive impairment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-39">
     [39]
    </xref>. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
     Table 3
    </xref> showed that deep affected area is related to post-stroke cognitive impairment in hemorrhagic stroke (p = 0.005). <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
     Table 4
    </xref> showed that affected area of posterior cerebral artery is related to post-stroke cognitive functioning impairment in ischemic stroke (p = 0.048). About it, Munsch and collaborators suggested that the onset of post-stroke cognitive impairment could be related to the location of cerebral infarction <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133934-40">
     [40]
    </xref>.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Limitations of the Study</title>
   <p>Cross-sectional studies cannot establish causality. Timing of patient assessment (subacute phase) may overestimate cognitive problems (86.21% of survivors). Restricting the study to public health facilities may introduce bias due to the social status of the population. The study may be biased by the exclusion of a significant number of participants from the study consortium, particularly for illiteracy (n = 82, 19.76%) and aphasia (n = 35, 8.43%). In addition, the use of the MoCA test, which has not been validated in sub-Saharan African populations, could lead to misinterpretation of cognitive impairment in participants from these countries, potentially overestimating the impact. Despite these limitations, the study provides valuable data on cognitive impairment after stroke in sub-Saharan Africa. This can inform public awareness, policy recommendations and future research into effective interventions.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>6. Conclusion</title>
   <p>This study provides data on frequencies and related risk factors of cognitive status among patients in subacute stage of stroke in Abidjan. Global cognitive functioning and executive functions were highly impaired, language was moderately impaired while memory was less impaired. The level of education and the affected brain area were risk factors associated with the occurrence of cognitive functioning disorders. The interest of this study is the importance of early screening of cognitive disorders after a stroke for many cognitive functions have been found to be impaired. The cognitive care of stroke patients should benefit from these findings. We plan to integrate further aspects such as the patient’s lifestyle in the research of post-stroke cognitive disorders in order to find more associated factors.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s7">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>We especially and attentively thank the family members of the Biology and Health Laboratory, Felix Houphouët-Boigny University and the medical staff of the University Hospital who contributed significantly to the completion of this project.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s8">
   <title>Consent to Participate</title>
   <p>Informed consent was obtained from the patient.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s9">
   <title>Authors’ Contribution</title>
   <p>NNA and ON contributed to writing this manuscript; ON and KKL contributed to revising the manuscript. TNA and KKL contributed to the study design. NNA performed all the data analyses.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Albakaye, M. (2010) Les accidents vasculaires cérébraux au mali: Étude des filières de prise en charge. Thèse Méd., FMOS, Bamako, No. 232, 113 p.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Esiri, M., Matthews, F., Brayne, C., Ince, P., Matthews, F. and Xuereb, J. (2001) Pathological Correlates of Late-Onset Dementia in a Multicentre, Community-Based Population in England and Wales. The Lancet, 357, 169-175.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rockwood, K., Wentzel, C., Hachinski, V., Hogan, D.B., MacKnight, C. and McDowell, I. (2000) Prevalence and Outcomes of Vascular Cognitive Impairment. Vascular Cognitive Impairment Investigators of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. Neurology, 54, 447-451. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.54.2.447</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Saposnik, G., Cote, R., Rochon, P.A., Mamdani, M., Liu, Y. and Raptis, S. (2011) Care and Outcomes in Patients with Ischemic Stroke with and without Preexisting Dementia. Neurology, 77, 1664-1673. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823648f1</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Patel, M., Coshall, C., Rudd, A.G. and Wolfe, C.D. (2003) Natural History of Cognitive Impairment after Stroke and Factors Associated with Its Recovery. Clinical Rehabilitation, 17, 158-166. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215503cr596oa</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lesniak, M., Bak, T., Czepiel, W., Seniów, J. and Członkowska, A. (2008) Frequency and Prognostic Value of Cognitive Disorders in Stroke Patients. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 26, 356-363. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1159/000162262</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jacova, C., Pearce, L.A., Costello, R., McClure, L.A., Holliday, S.L. and Hart, R.G. (2012) Cognitive Impairment in Lacunar Strokes: The SPS3 Trial. Annals of Neurology, 72, 351-362. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.23733</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Whiting, D.R., Hayes, L. and Unwin N.C. (2003) Diabetes in Africa. Challenges to Health Care for Diabetes in Africa. Journal of Cardiovascular Risk, 10, 103-110. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/174182670301000205</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jorm, A. and Jacomb, P. (1989) The Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE): Socio-Demographic Correlates, Reliability, Validity and Some Norms. Psychological Medicine, 19, 1015-1022. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700005742</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nasreddine, Z.S., Phillips, N.A., BÉDirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V. and Collin, I. (2005) The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool for Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 695-699. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dubois, B., Slachevsky, A., Litvan, I. and Pillon, B. (2000) The FAB: A Frontal Assessment Battery at Bedside. Neurology, 55, 1621-1626. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.55.11.1621</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Flamand-Roze, C., Falissard, B., Roze, E., Maintigneux, L., Beziz, J., Chacon, A., JoinLambert, C., Adams, D. and Denier, C. (2011) Validation of a New Language-Screening Tool for Patients with Acute Stroke: The Language Screening Test (LAST). Stroke, 42, 1224-1229. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.609503</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Blackburn, H.L. and Benton, A.L. (1957) Revised Administration and Scoring of the Digit Span Test. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 139-143. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047235</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Vidović, M., Sinanović, O., Sabaskić, L., Haticić, A. and Brkić, E. (2011) Incidence and Types of Speech Disorders in Stroke Patients. Acta Clinica Croatica, 50, 491-494.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cullen, B., O’Neill, B., Evans, J.J., Coen, R.F. and Lawlor, B.A.A. (2007) Review of Screening Tests for Cognitive Impairment. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 78, 790-799. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2006.095414</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Burton, L. and Tyson, S.F. (2015) Screening for Cognitive Impairment after Stroke: A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties and Clinical Utility. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 47, 193-203. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1930</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tu, Q.Y., Yang, X., Ding, B.R., Jin, H., Lei, Z.H. and Bai, S. (2011) Epidemiological Investigation of Vascular Cognitive Impairment Post Ischemic Stroke. Chinese Journal of Gerontology, 31, 3576-3579.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mukhopadhyay, A., Sundar, U., Adwani, S. and Pandit, D. (2012) Prevalence of Stroke and Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment in the Elderly in Dharavi, Mumbai. Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, 60, 29-32.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Qu, Y., Zhuo, L., Li, N., Hu, Y., Chen, W. and Zhou, Y. (2015) Prevalence of Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment in China: A Community-Based, Cross-Sectional Study. PLOS ONE, 10, e0122864. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122864</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pinzon, R.T., Rosa, D.S. and Satrianti, T. (2018) The Prevalence and Determinant Factors of Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment. Asian Pacific Journal of Health Sciences, 5, 78-83. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.21276/apjhs.2018.5.1.17</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Jokinen, H., Melkas, S., Ylikoski, R., Pohjasvaara, T., Kaste, M., Erkinjuntti, T. and Hietanen, M. (2015) Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment Is Common Even after Successful Clinical Recovery. Journal Européen de Neurologie, 22, 1288-1294. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.12743</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sarfo, F.S., Akassi, J., Adamu, S., Obese, V. and Ovbiagele, B. (2017) Fardeau et prédicteurs des troubles cognitifs post-avc chez un échantillon de survivants ghanéens d’un avc. Journal des accidents vasculaires cérébraux et des maladies cérébrovasculaires: Le journal officiel de la national stroke association, 26, 2553-2562.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Akinyemi, R.O., Allan, L., Owolabi, M.O., Akinyemi, J.O., Ogbole, G., Ajani, A., Firbank, M., Ogunniyi, A. and Kalaria, R.N. (2014) Profil et déterminants de la déficience cognitive vasculaire chez les survivants africains d’un avc: L’étude cogfast nigeria. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 346, 241-249. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2014.08.042</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kaddumukasa, M.N., Kaddumukasa, M.K.E., Sewankambo, N.L., Namujju, D. and Goldstein, L.B. (2023) Prévalence et prédicteurs des troubles cognitifs post-avc chez les survivants d’un avc en ouganda. BMC Neurology, 23, Article No. 166. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03212-8</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wagle, J., Farner, L. and Flekkøy, K. (2011) Early Post-Stroke Cognition in Stroke Rehabilitation Patients Predicts Functional Outcome at 13 Months. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 31, 379-387. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1159/000328970</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lees, R., Stott, D.J., Quinn, T.J. and Broomfield, N.M. (2014) Feasibility and Diagnostic Accuracy of Early Mood Screening to Diagnose Persisting Clinical Depression/Anxiety Disorder after Stroke. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 37, 323-329. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1159/000360755</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hachinski, V.C., Iliff, L.D., Zilhka, E., Du Boulay, G.H., McAllister, V.L. and Marshall, J. (1975) Cerebral Blood Flow in Dementia. Archives of Neurology, 32, 632-637. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1975.00490510088009</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhao, S., Guo, C., Wang, M., Chen, W., Wu, Y. and Tang, W. (2011) A Clinical Memory Battery for Screening for Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment in an Elderly Chinese Population. The American Journal of Geriatric Pharmacotherapy, 18, 774-779. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2010.07.149</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gorelick, P.B., Scuteri, A. and Black, S.E. (2011) Vascular Contributions to Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 42, 2672-2713. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0b013e3182299496</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wang, J., Xiao, L.D., Wang, K., Luo, Y. and Li, X. (2020) Déficience cognitive et facteurs associés chez les personnes âgées rurales du nord de la chine. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 77, 1241-1253. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-200404</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     El-Sheik, W.M., El-Emam, A.I., El-Rahman, A. and Salim, G.M. (2021) Prédicteurs de démence après un premier accident vasculaire cérébral ischémique. Dementia&amp;Neuropsychologia, 15, 216-222. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-57642021dn15-020009</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tang, W.K. and Chan, H.F.K. (2006) Frequency and Clinical Determinants of Poststroke Cognitive Impairment in Nondemented Stroke Patients. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 19, 65-71. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/0891988706286230</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Stern, Y. (2009) Réserve Cognitive. Neuropsychologie, 47, 2015-2028. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.004</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chen, X.D., Han, L., Tian, Y., Dai, L. and Wang, Q. (2016) Prédicteurs de déficience cognitive vasculaire chez les patients victimes d’un AVC. Neurologie BMC, 16, Article No. 115. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-016-0638-8</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Singh-Manoux, A., Marmot, M.G. and Glymour, M. (2011) Does Cognitive Reserve Shape Cognitive Decline? Annals of Neurology, 70, 296-304. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22391</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zahodne, L.B., Glymour, M.M. and Sparks, C. (2011) Education Does Not Slow Cognitive Decline with Aging: 12-Year Evidence from the Victoria Longitudinal Study. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17, 1039-1046. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617711001044</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Elbaz, A., Vicente-Vytopilova, P. and Tavernier, B. (2013) Motor Function in the Elderly: Evidence for the Reserve Hypothesis. Neurology, 81, 417-426. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31829d8761</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Douiri, A., Rudd, A.G. and Wolfe, C.D. (2013) Prevalence of Poststroke Cognitive Impairment: South London Stroke Register 1995-2010. Stroke, 44, 138-145. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.670844</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Khedr, E.M., Hamed, H.K. and El-Shereef (2009) Cognitive Impairment after Cerebrovascular Stroke: Relationship to Vascular Risk Factors. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 5, 103-116. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S4184</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.133934-ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Munsch, F., Sagnier, S., Asselineau, J., Bigourdan, A., Guttmann, C.R. and Debruxelles, S. (2016) Stroke Location Is an Independent Predictor of Cognitive Outcome. Stroke, 47, 66-73. 
     <u>&gt;https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011242</u>
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>