<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJN</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Nursing</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2162-5336</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojn.2024.146019</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJN-133881</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Exploring Critical Thinking Dispositions among Fourth Year BSc Nursing Students of Various Colleges of Nursing, Pakistan
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sadaf</surname><given-names>Younis</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Najma</surname><given-names>Balquees Anwar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Syeda</surname><given-names>Fakhar Batool</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>College of Nursing, Combined Military Hospital, Quetta, Pakistan</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>06</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>267</fpage><lpage>281</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>8,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2024</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>19,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  <b>Background:</b> Critical Thinking (CT) dispositions in nursing are prominent predictors of competence in delivering high-quality care, and of professionalism, in newly graduated nurses. CT skills, in isolation of CT dispositions, do not guarantee success in the workplace, because Critical Thinking Dispositions (CTD) are important elements of intellectual reasoning that simulate a person towards using the CT skills. Therefore, nursing educational programs should promote lifelong learning rather than focusing on transferring the content of nursing knowledge only. And for this purpose, quality education is the key. Education should focus on teaching from diverse perspectives, incorporating various teaching learning strategies that are congruent with the modern era. 
  <b>Purpose:</b> The purpose of this study is to explore critical thinking dispositions among final year Baccalaureate Nursing students of various military colleges of nursing, in Pakistan. 
  <b>Methodology:</b> A descriptive qualitative exploratory study design was used to investigate the CTD of BSc final year nursing students. The study population included twelve willing nursing students, from six military colleges across the country. Demographic information and consent was taken from the participants of the study. In-depth interviews, through a semi structured interview guide, and probes were used to obtain data related to personal experiences of CTD amongst the nursing students. 
  <b>Results:</b> Data analysis showed two broad themes: 1) Perceptions of CT, and 2) Experiences of CT dispositions. In theme one, the emerging category was: Clarity of CT; whereas in theme two, the categories that emerged were: a) Truth Seeking, b) Open Mindedness, c) Inquisitiveness, and d) Self Organization. 
  <b>Conclusion:</b> The findings of the study revealed positive dispositions towards truth seeking, open mindedness, and self-organization, whereas disposition towards inquisitiveness was weak. Self-confidence and maturity also emerged as positive factors that the students possessed. This study recommends that faculty and learners should extend their concept of CTD, and emphasizes its application in daily routine. Additionally, faculty should modify their instructional strategies and focus on the cultivation of dispositions of inquisitiveness, curiosity, and allow questioning by students in the class.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Critical Thinking</kwd><kwd> Critical Thinking Disposition</kwd><kwd> Nursing Students</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Critical Thinking (CT) in nursing is a significant element in high-quality care and professionalism which is achieved through the quality of education. Hence, the quintessence of teaching and learning has its roots in developing CT Dispositions in nursing students so that they are able to meet the 21st-century challenges and are equipped to tackle unpredictable situations in highly diversified environments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref1">1</xref>] . Furthermore, graduate nurses experience a high level of apprehension and anxiety while moving from a familiar educational setting into the acute care hospitals as a practicing nurse. This transition becomes increasingly difficult as it carries a heavy burden of expectations to rapidly function as a person with CTD [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>According to Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref3">3</xref>] , CT has a deep association with personal skills, attitudes, and dispositions required of a critical thinker. They further state, “critical thinking disposition represents an inclination of a person to use possessed skills such as: analyzing, applying standards, discriminating, information seeking, logical reasoning, predicting and transforming knowledge” (p. 357). Based on the 1990 Delphi study expert consensus, Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref4">4</xref>] describes CTD in these words: truth-seeking, inquisitiveness, fair-mindedness, analyticity, flexibility, systematicity, self-confidence, maturity and respect to entertain diverse viewpoints.</p><p>The National Policy on Education, Pakistan, indicates that the curriculum of nursing education should inculcate critical thinking, problem-solving skills, inquiry habits, autonomous learning, and group dynamics among learners [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref1">1</xref>] . Moreover, active teaching methods encourage the use of higher-order thinking and enhance CTD. Some of these strategies are problem-based learning, reflective writing, concept maps, jigsaw simulations, etc. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref5">5</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref10">10</xref>] . However, developing CTD in students is often overlooked by teachers who use traditional teaching pedagogies and find it difficult to shift to the usage of student centered pedagogies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref11">11</xref>] . Another reason could be that, in nursing education, the focus is more on teacher directed learning, content coverage, and disease-oriented learning pedagogies, with the sole purpose of instilling basic and relevant theoretical knowledge required for practice. The assumption here is that this aspect of CTD is neglected in the content of nursing education. So, there is a need to identify the gaps and find the areas of improvement in pedagogical practices, and to train faculty to promote the development of nursing students who are critical thinkers, and are able to handle complex situations with absolute knowledge and scientific evidence.</p><sec id="s1_1"><title>1.1. Purpose of Study</title><p>The study purpose was to explore the critical thinking dispositions present among the final year BSc Nursing students in the various Colleges of Nursing, Pakistan.</p></sec><sec id="s1_2"><title>1.2. Study Question</title><p>What are the critical thinking dispositions present among final year BSc nursing students of various Colleges of Nursing in Pakistan?</p></sec><sec id="s1_3"><title>1.3. Significance of the Study</title><p>A detailed literature review showed that promoting CTD was a neglected content in nursing education in Pakistan. The few studies that have been conducted on CT in Pakistan have focused on the curriculum at the school and college level [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref12">12</xref>] ; some on strategies enhancing CT in students [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref9">9</xref>] ; and one study focused on how CT is perceived and practiced by educators in higher education [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref12">12</xref>] . However, to the best of the researcher’s knowledge, this study will be the first study to explore the CT dispositions in nursing students of military colleges across the country.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Literature Review</title><p>A comprehensive and structured search was conducted to analyze the published literature in relation to CT dispositions among nursing students.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Historical Perspective of Critical Thinking</title><p>Critical thinking, tracing its roots back to the eighteenth century [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref13">13</xref>] , gained specific terminology in 1989 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref14">14</xref>] . Ancient philosophers like Socrates emphasized the importance of questioning, with Plato and Aristotle further defining it as a dialogue within the soul and a combination of abstract and moral reasoning [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref15">15</xref>] . Critical thinking has since been linked to reflective judgment, problem-solving, and the scientific method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref4">4</xref>] . Its teaching began in kindergarten and was later emphasized in nursing education programs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref12">12</xref>] , with ongoing global efforts to describe and teach this essential skill.</p><p>Delphi Survey, 1990: Various authors have provided definitions of critical thinking, reflecting its complex nature. This diversity led to confusion, prompting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref16">16</xref>] to coordinate a consensus on the definition. The American Philosophical Association conducted a Delphi Survey, involving 46 experts from North America, resulting in a comprehensive definition. Critical thinking, as per this survey, encompasses a range of qualities, including curiosity, rationality, open-mindedness, honesty, and persistence [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref16">16</xref>] . Importantly, it integrates cognitive skills with affective dispositions.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. CT Skills and Dispositions</title><p>The key factor in the interpretation of CT is that it is not a method but a process or, in other words, it is mind orientation encompassing the affective and cognitive domains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref17">17</xref>] . Cognitive skills are necessary for judgment, by engaging in analyzing, interpreting, evaluating, and regulating self [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref7">7</xref>] ; whereas affective or personality attributes refer to dispositions or inclination, sensitivity, as well as the ability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref17">17</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Critical Thinking Dispositions</title><p>The person is considered a critical thinker who is able to apply CT dispositions or habits of minds in his actions, beliefs and thoughts, which are determined judiciously.</p><p>Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref16">16</xref>] , explained a person’s dispositions as follows:</p><p>Open-mindedness. The ability to appreciate different perspectives or willing to respect people having alternative opinions.</p><p>Inquisitiveness. Curiosity and enthusiasm in wanting to acquire information about working on things, even though the application is not required immediately.</p><p>Truth-Seeking. Possessing the courage to ask questions to gain knowledge, even if the knowledge obtained is against beliefs.</p><p>Analyticity. Analyzing and utilizing verified information with the application of reasoning to anticipate consequences.</p><p>Systematicity. Approaching different levels of complex problems with focus and diligence.</p><p>Self-Confidence. Trusting one’s thinking or decision making skills, which are rational or scientific, and respond to societal as well as individual values.</p><p>Maturity. Making timely decisions even when faced with complex situations and issues.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Studies Related to CT Disposition</title><p>CT dispositions are highly regarded in nursing and have been extensively researched globally. Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref18">18</xref>] conducted a literature review revealing differences in CTD between Asian and non-Asian nursing students. Among 795 articles reviewed, only 73 focused on nursing students’ CT skills and dispositions, with just 15 assessing CTD specifically. These studies highlighted a limited focus on CT dispositions in educational practices, with Asian students tending to score lower than their non-Asian counterparts.</p><p>Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref19">19</xref>] , conducted a study in Egypt, finding a positive correlation between learning approaches and CTD in nursing students. The study recommended integrating diverse learning methods into the curriculum to enhance CT skills. However, many students showed low truth-seeking scores, possibly due to passive learning methods and reluctance to ask questions.</p><p>Educational trends in Pakistan still focus on teacher centered approaches and allow minimum amount of CT promotion in students [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref20">20</xref>] . This is supported by reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref21">21</xref>] , where they indicated that in the Pakistani education system, the main focus is on rote learning, where transfer of factual information is a priority and emphasis is on superficial knowledge, neglecting underlying meaning. Reference ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref20">20</xref>] , p. 131) states that teaching in Pakistan “heavily relies on dictation” and “examinations are the tests of memory” this particular issue is also signaled previously by various other scholars in Pakistan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref23">23</xref>] . Educational reforms are needed to “develop students, not as a memorizer of given information but as a searcher and explorer of the information” ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref24">24</xref>] , p. 2020).</p><p>Cultural stereotypes persist in education, with the expectation of complete silence in class reflecting respect for teacher authority [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref20">20</xref>] . This traditional approach has been criticized by Pakistani educationist [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref22">22</xref>] for hindering the development of critical thinking (CT) and logical reasoning skills. In Pakistan, institutions often limit CTD by emphasizing reverence for teachers as spiritual figures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref20">20</xref>] .</p><p>Moreover, teachers themselves have limited knowledge about how to cultivate CT amongst students. The research survey conducted on 309 Turkish prospective teachers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref25">25</xref>] , also highlighted that CT dispositions of teachers is at a medium to low level. Therefore, developing CTD of the educators first is very vital. Although, in Pakistan, there is awareness amongst educators regarding the need for a paradigm shift to modern educational strategies, but, as yet, this has not been achieved [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref27">27</xref>] .</p><p>Educational institutes in Pakistan, focus on the rote learning [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref28">28</xref>] and teachers usually take the role of information givers rather than that of a facilitator [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref30">30</xref>] . Moreover, in the Pakistani educational system, classes are lecture-based, notes are dictated, and students listen to the lectures, with the purpose of enabling them to transmit textbook knowledge [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref20">20</xref>] . No study was found on nursing students of Pakistan that identified their CTD, especially in the military setting, where the education system is quite different from other colleges.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Methodology</title><p>A descriptive qualitative exploratory study design was utilized to explore the student nurses’ CT dispositions. The study population included nursing students of final year BSc nursing program from all six military nursing colleges located in different cities of Pakistan. The purpose of selecting all six military colleges was to study the phenomenon in a variety of locations and contexts. For creating a heterogeneous purposive sample, students from each military college were chosen.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Sampling Protocol</title><p>Purposive sampling was utilized to answer the research question and to recruit the study participants based on the inclusion criteria. Permission to gather data from six nursing colleges was obtained from the concerned authority and approval to conduct this study was taken from the Ethics Review Committee of the Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. Written informed consent was obtained from the nursing students for participation. Moreover, the privacy, confidentiality and anonymity of the participants was also maintained.</p><p>The sampling process involved obtaining lists of final year BSc nursing students from each college’s administration department. Study participants were then recruited from these lists, briefed about the study details, and selected based on predetermined criteria. Full time nursing cadets who were final year BSc Nursing Students were selected. The final sample size was two participants from each setting, which made a total of twelve participants. Appropriate data saturation was achieved at the tenth interview in this study. However, two additional interviews were carried out to ensure saturation.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Data Collection and Analysis</title><p>Participant’s demographic data was gathered before conducting in-depth interviews exploring critical thinking dispositions in nursing students. Interviews were conducted in various locations, respecting participant preferences, and recorded with consent in both English and Urdu. Non-verbal cues were noted via field notes. Transcriptions of interviews were coded and securely stored, followed by content analysis to identify themes and categories. Relevant data was extracted and grouped into codes, refined through repeated recognition and revision. Themes were generated and interpreted, with literature review aiding in refinement. Conclusions were drawn, verified against existing literature, and supplemented by interview field notes.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Findings</title><p>The demographic details of the participants have been described in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Perceptions of CT and Experiences of CT Dispositions</title><p>The interview data focused on describing what is CT and CTD. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> depicts these two themes, categories, and their subcategories.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Theme 1: Perceptions of CT</title><p>From the first theme, one category emerged: clarity of CT. which represents the students’ understanding of CT, and their attributes. In response to a question about what is CT, the participants gave various definitions. They defined CT, as problem-solving skills, management or handling of critical situations, decision making, analysis, deep rational thinking, and utilizing CT skills, such as intellect, evidence-based practice, exploring a problem, and reaching a conclusion. However, when participants were asked to define the attributes of a critical thinker, they were unable to differentiate between CT skills and dispositions, and some merged both the terms.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Demographic characteristics of the participants</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N (12)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >(%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Institution</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >College of Nursing 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >College of Nursing 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >College of Nursing 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >College of Nursing 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >College of Nursing 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >College of Nursing 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gender</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marital status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Married</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unmarried</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qualification</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intermediate (FSc)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Undergraduate (BSc In Zoology)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.6</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Theme 2: Experiences of CT Dispositions</title><p>The second theme that emerged from different excerpts of the participants was experiences of CTD. It consists of four categories: truth-seeking, open-mindedness, inquisitiveness, and self-organization. The theme is described as follows:</p><sec id="s4_3_1"><title>4.3.1. Category 1</title><p>Truth seeking. Questions to explore truth-seeking, resulted in two subcategories as many participants’ expressed their maturity and self-confidence as explanation of truth seeking disposition, and they talked about how they trust their thinking skills while pursuing truth. Therefore, the subcategories are: Maturity/ Self-Confidence and thinking perspective.</p><p>Maturity and Self-Confidence. Questions related to pursuit of truth and approach towards problems in life, produced response about their internally and externally driven support system to manage problems. A participant, referring to an internally driven personal resource, was confident on self-effort to collect all the required information for grasping the gist of the situation, clarifying ideas,</p><p>and thinking of all possible solutions that one can undertake for arriving at a conclusion. Few talked about the use of external resources and said: “It is wise to take guidance from your teacher, parents, friends, siblings or a skilful person around you” (2c4). Some students responded that they exhibited anxiousness, frustration, and tension when they faced problems and they did not disclose them.</p><p>Thinking perspectives. Thinking perspectives is about expression of own thinking attributes. Majority of the participants elaborated that they re-evaluated their ideas through related articles and standing operating procedures (SOPs) etc., which helped them to understand the flaws and provided them a chance of filling the gaps; improved their work and produced better results.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3_2"><title>4.3.2. Category 2</title><p>Open-mindedness. The subcategories of flexibility, ethos of respect, and acceptance of criticism emerged from the participants’ excerpts when asked about open-mindedness.</p><p>Flexibility. This was questioned in terms of how much flexibility was there as an individual and as a part of military organization. Some said that the military culture was very strict in inculcating discipline, self-control, good communication, and positive attitude and behavior. One participant expounded: “Frankly speaking, before joining military college, I was very rigid in terms of attitude and self-control, but now I’m flexible” (3c6). Moreover, few said that it was their professional demand to be flexible, especially towards patients and families. Furthermore, 80% students admitted their mistakes.</p><p>Ethos of Respect. As far as acceptance of peer’s viewpoint was concerned, 100% students responded that as the military culture has an ethos of respecting others, it has taught them to accept people with different cultures, background, religion, and languages.</p><p>Criticism tolerance. Open-mindedness is also explained as tolerance of criticism. Majority of participants took it positively, as a way of learning from mistakes, guidance for betterment, and personality improvement approach. However, a student also said: “Criticism is just like a mother-in-law’s taunting” (3c6).</p></sec><sec id="s4_3_3"><title>4.3.3. Category 3</title><p>Inquisitiveness. Various perceptions emerged when the participants were asked questions related to inquisitiveness.</p><p>Curiosity and Questioning. This subcategory describes participants’ intellectual curiosity and learning desire. When the participants were asked about asking questions in the classroom, they replied that questioning keep them alert, lecture more absorbing and interactive class enhance learning. However, majority students said that they do not ask questions during class. One student shared: “I don’t ask questions, I try to answer my question by myself” (4c3, 6). The attitude of the faculty was considered responsible for reluctance in asking questioning, as verbalized by one participant: “Teachers mostly mind our asking questions. They become irritated, because they think that we are asking questions to test and degrade them” (4c3, 9). A few students even verbalized negative remarks by the faculty upon asking questions, which disheartened them. For example: “I used to ask many questions but, later, I quit and regret that thing because most of my questions were not answered… teacher’s response was “It is not of your level” and Google for details. If I have to Google things, then why the hell I’m sitting in the classroom?” (4c3, 6). One student said: “Yes it’s very fearful to ask a question to the senior” (8c3, 3). One more student said: “I interrupted my teacher and asked the question while she was explaining us something. She said, have some patience, you will get the answer later” (8c3, 4). Additionally, one student replied, “There are teachers who mind questioning… although many times my concept is not clear… later, I have to search on my own” (4c3, 9). Similarly, one student said: “We hesitate and get frightened to ask questions… I see the mood of our teacher and then ask questions but I think hundred times about the appropriateness of the question” (8c3, 8).</p><p>Creativity. Inquisitiveness is the key to creativity and innovation. When students were asked about their reaction to experiencing different innovations, the majority replied that innovation relieves stress, increases curiosity about modern discoveries, and this helps in better learning.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3_4"><title>4.3.4. Category 4</title><p>Self-Organization. In order to explore students’ sense of organization, questions were asked, like whether students were systematic, could anticipate the consequences or did they rush into decisions quickly.</p><p>Systematicity. This subcategory explains participants’ being an organized, focused, and orderly individual. Almost all the participants showed a positive perception about systematicity, prioritization and organizational skills in the daily schedule. For example, one participant replied, “I feel that I live on the watch” (6c2, 11). Furthermore, one student replied: “I like to follow the schedule. Laziness kills me” (6c2, 6).</p><p>Analyticity. The second subcategory explored students with respect to not only being alert to problematic situations but also valuing the analysis and application of evidence. Questions were asked about one’s potential to anticipate consequences, to which majority replied that they had a sharp sixth sense, alerting mechanism and predicting consequences. For example, one respondent replied: “I feel that my sixth sense is strong, and I get to know when something is going to be wrong” (5c3, 5).</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion</title><sec id="s5_1"><title>5.1. Perceptions and Clarity of Critical Thinking</title><p>The participants had an overall mixed and diverse understanding of CT and showed a lack of clear distinction between CT skills and dispositions which are consistent with the studies of reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref12">12</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref31">31</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5_2"><title>5.2. Experiences of CT Dispositions</title><p>Participants shared four categories of CTD: truth seeking, open mindedness, inquisitiveness, and self-organization for the second theme. Three of the four categories, i.e., Truth Seeking, Open Mindedness, and Inquisitiveness are highlighted by reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref16">16</xref>] as CTD. Whereas, fourth one, self-organization attribute, seem to be directly related to as being organized and disciplined. This finding is supported by reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref32">32</xref>] , reinforces that nursing students’ CTD are directly related with their personal attributes as being organized.</p><sec id="s5_2_1"><title>5.2.1. Truth Seeking</title><p>The study participants were asked about their truth seeking attribute, the responses revealed their maturity and self-confidence in their ways of problem management, along with their thinking perspectives. The findings of study by reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref33">33</xref>] are similar to the findings of the current study. Participants also stated that re-evaluation helped them understand their mistakes, improved their work quality, and led to more learning. Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref16">16</xref>] considered this disposition as maturity and self-confidence, but in this study it complemented the trait of the truth seeking disposition.</p><p>Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref16">16</xref>] , examined CTD of two groups of army officers and concluded that truth seeking scored the lowest. Similarly, truth seeking scores were found to be the lowest in Asian nursing students in studies by references [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref34">34</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref35">35</xref>] . These findings resonate to some extent with the findings of the current study as the low scores of truth seeking dispositions in this study can be attributed to passive traditional instructional environment in nursing schools. This finding concurs with studies by references [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref23">23</xref>] , whereby nursing students of the current study struggle with questioning their faculty, which affects negatively on their ability to seek truth. A plausible solution is discussed by reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref36">36</xref>] , and the researcher’s opinion based on own experience, show that educators must teach and respond to the curriculum differently.</p></sec><sec id="s5_2_2"><title>5.2.2. Open Mindedness</title><p>The second category, revealed by the current study was open mindedness. It was found that almost all the military students were open minded and showed flexibility, ethos of respect, and acceptance of criticism. Participants stated that the military culture had helped them to improve their attitude, respect the institutional ethos and the diversity of their peers. These findings are consistent with the findings by reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref35">35</xref>] , where he measured CTD in Egyptian nurses, and reported high level scores for open-mindedness.</p></sec><sec id="s5_2_3"><title>5.2.3. Inquisitiveness</title><p>The students were explored by inquiring about perceptions related to their curiosity, asking questions, and experiencing innovation. Inquisitiveness has yielded the highest scores in several studies conducted on nursing students [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref38">38</xref>] , which is in contrast with the current study. The current study revealed that only few students asked questions from teachers. This is in contrast to the study done by reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref39">39</xref>] , where military officers scored the highest for inquisitiveness. The current study also revealed that in the military nursing students are taught to respect, and follow their seniors. Similarly, reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref20">20</xref>] also reported that cultural stereotyping along with the notion of pin drop silence, and respect for teacher’s authority, suppressed inquisitiveness [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref20">20</xref>] . A study by reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref21">21</xref>] reported that, in the Pakistani education system, rote learning is the main focus and priority is on transfer of factual and superficial information. This restricts the students from asking questions beyond the context of lecture. Moreover, many studies in Pakistan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref40">40</xref>] report limiting students’ CT dispositions by forcing them to respect teachers, who ought to be heard and not questioned.</p></sec><sec id="s5_2_4"><title>5.2.4. Self-Organization</title><p>The participants were asked about their self-organization skills, as in the nursing profession being systematic is important and valued [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref41">41</xref>] . The participants had a positive perception about systematicity and analyticity, which, according to them, is promoted highly in the military culture and training. These findings concur with study conducted in Saudi Arabia, Hong Kong SAR and Chinese mainland, where students demonstrated high scores in systematicity and analyticity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133881-ref41">41</xref>] .</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>The findings of the study revealed positive dispositions towards truth seeking, open mindedness, and self-organization; whereas, disposition towards inquisitiveness was weak. The dispositions of self-confidence and maturity were also present positively. Furthermore, this study recommends enhancement of faculty knowledge regarding CT disposition and modification of the instructional strategies in order to promote the cultivation of truth seeking, open mindedness, inquisitiveness, analyticity, systematicity, self-confidence and maturity. This must be done through faculty development.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Younis, S., Anwar, N.B. and Batool, S.F. (2024) Exploring Critical Thinking Dispositions among Fourth Year BSc Nursing Students of Various Colleges of Nursing, Pakistan. Open Journal of Nursing, 14, 267-281. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2024.146019</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.133881-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ajmal, M.F., Jumani, P.D.N.B. and Malik, P.D.S. (2016) Utilizing Problem Based Learning in Pre-Service Teacher Education: Experiences of Prospective Teachers in Pakistan. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Education and Human Development&lt;/i&gt;, 5, 215-222.&lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v5n2a25</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kaihlanen, A.-M., Haavisto, E., Strandell-Laine, C. and Salminen, L. (2017) Facilitating the Transition from a Nursing Student to a Registered Nurse in the Final Clinical Practicum: A Scoping Literature Review. &lt;i&gt;Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences&lt;/i&gt;, 32, 466-477. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12494</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Facione, N.C., Facione, P.A. and Sanchez, C.A. (1994) Critical Thinking Disposition as a Measure of Competent Clinical Judgment: The Development of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Nursing Education&lt;/i&gt;, 33, 345-350. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-19941001-05</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Facione, P.A., Facione, N.C. and Giancarlo, C.A.F. (2001) California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory: CCTDI. California Academic Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Choi, E., Lindquist, R. and Song, Y. (2014) Effects of Problem-Based Learning vs. Traditional Lecture on Korean Nursing Students&amp;#8217; Critical Thinking, Problem-Solving, and Self-Directed Learning. &lt;i&gt;Nurse Education Today&lt;/i&gt;, 34, 52-56. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zubaidah, S., Corebima, A.D., Mahanal, S. and Mistianah, M. (2018) Revealing the Relationship between Reading Interest and Critical Thinking Skills through Remap GI and Remap Jigsaw. &lt;i&gt;International Journal of Instruction&lt;/i&gt;, 11, 41-56. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1124a</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Naber, J. and Wyatt, T.H. (2014) The Effect of Reflective Writing Interventions on the Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions of Baccalaureate Nursing Students. &lt;i&gt;Nurse Education Today&lt;/i&gt;, 34, 67-72. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.04.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shin, H., Ma, H., Park, J., Ji, E.S. and Kim, D.H. (2015) The Effect of Simulation Courseware on Critical Thinking in Undergraduate Nursing Students: Multi-Site Pre-Post Study. &lt;i&gt;Nurse Education Today&lt;/i&gt;, 35, 537-542.&lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.12.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Burrell, L.A. (2014) Integrating Critical Thinking Strategies into Nursing Curricula. &lt;i&gt;Teaching and Learning in Nursing&lt;/i&gt;, 9, 53-58. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2013.12.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gilboy, M.B., Heinerichs, S. and Pazzaglia, G. (2015) Enhancing Student Engagement Using the Flipped Classroom. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior&lt;/i&gt;, 47, 109-114. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Njie-Carr, V.P.S., Ludeman, E., Lee, M.C., Dordunoo, D., Trocky, N.M. and Jenkins, L.S. (2017) An Integrative Review of Flipped Classroom Teaching Models in Nursing Education. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Professional Nursing&lt;/i&gt;, 33, 133-144. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.07.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cassum, S.H. (2011) Perceptions and Practices of Critical Thinking amongst Faculty of Nursing, Medicine and Education in Karachi, Pakistan. Master&amp;#8217;s Thesis, Aga Khan University.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Facione, P.A., Sanchez, C.A., Facione, N.C. and Gainen, J. (1995) The Disposition Toward Critical Thinking. &lt;i&gt;The Journal of General Education&lt;/i&gt;, 44, 1-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ku, K.Y.L. (2009) Assessing Students&amp;#8217; Critical Thinking Performance: Urging for Measurements Using Multi-Response Format. &lt;i&gt;Thinking Skills and Creativity&lt;/i&gt;, 4, 70-76. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2009.02.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Daly, W.M. (1998) Critical Thinking as an Outcome of Nursing Education. What Is It? Why Is It Important to Nursing Practice? &lt;i&gt;Journal of Advanced Nursing&lt;/i&gt;, 28, 323-331. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00783.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Facione, P.A. (1990) Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction (The Delphi Report). California Academic Press, Millbrae.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">RN, E.S. and RN, M.C. (2002) Critical Thinking in Nursing Education: Literature Review. &lt;i&gt;International Journal of Nursing Practice&lt;/i&gt;, 8, 89-98. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-172x.2002.00340.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salsali, M., Tajvidi, M. and Ghiyasvandian, S. (2013) Critical Thinking Dispositions of Nursing Students in Asian and Non-Asian Countries: A Literature Review. &lt;i&gt;Glo&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;b&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;al Journal of Health Science&lt;/i&gt;, 5, 172-178. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v5n6p172</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kabeel, A.R. and Eisa, S.A.E.M.M. (2016) The Correlation of Critical Thinking Disposition and Approaches to Learning among Baccalaureate Nursing Students. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Education and Practice&lt;/i&gt;, 7, 91-103.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Manan, S.A. and Mehmood, T. (2015) Culture and Critical Thinking in Classroom: Narratives from University Students in Pakistan. &lt;i&gt;ELK Asia Pacific Journal of Social Sciences&lt;/i&gt;, 1, 110-134. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.16962/eapjss/issn.2394-9392/2015/v1i3.04</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rashid, S. and Qaisar, S. (2017) Development of Attitude through Critical Thinking. &lt;i&gt;Pakistan Journal of Education&lt;/i&gt;, 34, 35-53. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.30971/pje.v34i1.189</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hoodbhoy, P. (2009) Pakistan&amp;#8217;s Higher Education System&amp;#8212;What Went Wrong and How to Fix It.&lt;i&gt; The Pakistan Development Review&lt;/i&gt;, 48, 581-594. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.30541/v48i4iipp.581-594</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Siddiqui, S. (2007) Rethinking Education in Pakistan: Perceptions, Practices, and Possibilities. Paramount Publishing Enterprise.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Turan, H., Kolayis, H. and Ulusoy, Y.O. (2012) Comparison of the Faculty of Education Students&amp;#8217; Critical Thinking Disposition. &lt;i&gt;Procedia&lt;/i&gt;-&lt;i&gt;Social and Behavioral &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Sciences&lt;/i&gt;, 46, 2020-2024. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.421</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Demirhan, E. and K&amp;#246;kl&amp;#252;kaya, A.N. (2014) The Critical Thinking Dispositions of Prospective Science Teachers. &lt;i&gt;Procedia&lt;/i&gt;-&lt;i&gt;Social and Behavioral Sciences&lt;/i&gt;, 116, 1551-1555. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.433</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cassum, S.H., Profetto-McGrath, J., Begum Gul, R., Dilshad, A. and Syeda, K. (2013) Multidimensionality of Critical Thinking: A Holistic Perspective from Multidisciplinary Educators in Karachi, Pakistan. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Nursing Education and Practice&lt;/i&gt;, 3, 9-23. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v3n7p9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guleker, R. (2015) Albanian Pre Service Teachers&amp;#8217; Perspectives on Critical Thinking Dispositions. &lt;i&gt;Proceedings of the &lt;/i&gt;2&lt;i&gt;nd&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Teaching &amp; Education Conference&lt;/i&gt;, Florence, 16-19 September 2015, 27-35.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Raymond, C., Profetto-McGrath, J., Myrick, F. and Strean, W.B. (2017) An Integrative Review of the Concealed Connection: Nurse Educators&amp;#8217; Critical Thinking. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Nursing Education&lt;/i&gt;, 56, 648-654. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20171020-03</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gul, R.B., Khan, S., Ahmed, A., Cassum, S., Saeed, T., Parpio, Y., Schopflocher, D. and Profetto-McGrath, J. (2014) Enhancing Educators&amp;#8217; Skills for Promoting Critical Thinking in Their Classroom Discourses: A Randomized Control Trial. &lt;i&gt;Intern&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;tional Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education&lt;/i&gt;, 26, 37-54.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khalid, S.M. and Khan, M.F. (2006) Pakistan: The State of Education. &lt;i&gt;The Mus&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;lim World&lt;/i&gt;, 96, 305-322. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-1913.2006.00130.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kaya, H., &amp;#350;enyuva, E. and Bodur, G. (2017) Developing Critical Thinking Disposition and Emotional Intelligence of Nursing Students: A Longitudinal Research. &lt;i&gt;Nurse Education Today&lt;/i&gt;, 48, 72-77. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.09.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kalelioglu, F. and G&amp;#252;lbahar, Y. (2014) The Effect of Instructional Techniques on Critical Thinking and Critical Thinking Dispositions in Online Discussion. &lt;i&gt;Educ&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;tional Technology &amp; Society&lt;/i&gt;, 17, 248-258.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yu, W.C.W., Lin, C.C., Ho, M.H. and Wang, J. (2015) Technology Facilitated PBL Pedagogy and Its Impact on Nursing Students&amp;#8217; Academic Achievement and Critical Thinking Dispositions. &lt;i&gt;Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology&lt;/i&gt;-&lt;i&gt;TOJET&lt;/i&gt;, 14, 97-107.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, H. and Lambert, V. (2008) Critical Thinking Dispositions and Learning Styles of Baccalaureate Nursing Students from China. &lt;i&gt;Nursing &amp; Health Sciences&lt;/i&gt;, 10, 175-181. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2018.2008.00393.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mahmoud, H.G. (2012) Critical Thinking Dispositions and Learning Styles of Baccalaureate Nursing Students and Its Relation to Their Achievement. &lt;i&gt;International Journal of Learning and Development&lt;/i&gt;, 2, 398-415. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v2i1.1379</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dias, J. (2013) The Future of Nursing Education. &lt;i&gt;Canadian Medical Education &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Jou&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;r&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;nal&lt;/i&gt;, 4, e113-e114. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.36650</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wangensteen, S., Johansson, I.S., Bj&amp;#246;rkstr&amp;#246;m, M.E. and Nordstr&amp;#246;m, G. (2010) Critical Thinking Dispositions among Newly Graduated Nurses. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Advanced Nursing&lt;/i&gt;, 66, 2170-2181. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05282.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aytan, T. (2016) Evaluation of the 2006 and 2015 Turkish Education Program in Secondary School Curriculum in Turkey in Terms of Critical Thinking. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Education and Learning&lt;/i&gt;, 5, 38-46. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n2p38</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ayers, R.B. (2016) Optimizing Workforce Performance: Perceived Differences of Army Officer Critical Thinking Talent across Level of Education. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Southern Mississippi.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asad, M., Iqbal, K. and Sabir, M. (2015) Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning as a Strategy to Foster Problem Solving and Critical Reasoning Skills among Medical Students. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Ayub Medical College&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Abbottabad&lt;/i&gt;, 27, 604-607.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133881-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Noone, T. and Seery, A. (2018) Critical Thinking Dispositions in Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Case Study Approach. &lt;i&gt;Nurse Education Today&lt;/i&gt;, 68, 203-207. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.06.014</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>