<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJCC</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Climate Change</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2167-9495</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajcc.2024.132009</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJCC-133837</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Effect of Supplementary Irrigation on the Yield of Sorghum (
  Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) in the Context of Climate Change in the Dry Savannahs of Togo
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Adjiwanou</surname><given-names>Atiglo-Gbenou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yaovi</surname><given-names>Ou&amp;#233;zou Azouma</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jean</surname><given-names>Mianikpo Sogbedji</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Agricultural Mechanization and Process Engineering Research Team (ERMAP), Department of Rural Engineering and Agricultural Machinery, School of Agronomy, University of Lom&amp;amp;#233;, Lom&amp;amp;#233;, Togo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Soil, Climate ad Crop Sciences Interface Laboratory (LISSCPV), Department of Soil Science, School of Agronomy, University of Lom&amp;amp;#233;, Lom&amp;amp;#233;, Togo</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>05</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>163</fpage><lpage>174</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>12,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2024</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>18,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Under the current context of climate change, supplementary irrigation may be needed for crop production resilience. We determined the effects of supplementary irrigation on sorghum grain yield in the dry Savannah region of Togo. A two-year trial was conducted in a controlled environment at AREJ, an agro-ecological center in Cinkass&#233;. The plant material was sorghum variety Sorvato 28. The experimental design was a Completely Randomized Block with three replications and three treatments as follows: T
  <sub>0</sub> control plot (rainfed conditions); T
  <sub>1</sub> (supplementary irrigation from flowering to grain filling stage) and T
  <sub>2</sub> (supplementary irrigation from planting to grain filling stage). Two irrigation techniques (furrow and Californian system) were used under each watering treatment. The results showed that irrigation technique significantly affected panicle length with no effect on 1000 grains mass. Panicle length and grain yields varied from 15.59 to 25.71 cm and 0.0 to 2.06 t∙h
  <sup>−1</sup>, respectively, with the highest values (25.66 cm and 2.06 t∙h
  <sup>−1</sup>, respectively) under the T
  <sub>2</sub> treatment with the California system-based supplementary irrigation. The comparison of results obtained on treatment T
  <sub>0</sub> and T
  <sub>2</sub>, shows that supplementary irrigation increased the yields by at least 68.62%. Supplementary irrigation during sowing and growing season (T
  <sub>2</sub>) improved sorghum yields in the dry savannahs of Togo, with a better performance of the California irrigation system.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Climate Change</kwd><kwd> Supplementary Irrigation</kwd><kwd> Sorghum Grain Yield</kwd><kwd> Dry Savannah</kwd><kwd> Togo</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In Togo, cereals represent the leading staple crop and constitute the driving force of households’ incomes. Between 2005 and 2022, the areas grown to cereals increased from 210,718 ha to 316,034 ha and more than 53% of the areas are in the dry savannah zone  (African Union, 2022;   DSID, 2019) . Among the cereals produced in Togo, sorghum ranks second after maize and represents 26% of the annual cultivated areas  (African Union, 2022) . Over the past seventeen years, grain yield of sorghum (with a high nutritional value and source of income especially for women) has never exceeded 1.5 t/ha in the real world  (Togo, 2019) . Despite the efforts to improve this low productivity, sorghum production is unable to meet the ever-increasing needs of the population  (Hatfield et al., 2011;   Rao et al., 2015) . Instead, we are witnessing the abandonment of its production despite the introduction of new short-cycling varieties such as Sorvato 28.</p><p>One of the major constraints to the production of sorghum remains the erratic nature of the rains due to climate change which makes annual production uncertain. One of the effects of this climate change is the appearance of dry spells during sowing and plant development periods  (Adewi et al., 2010;   Adjoussi, 2000;   Atiglo-Gbenou &amp; Azouma, 2023) , a phenomenon which considerably affects the crop yield which decreases from year to year. It is therefore urgent to find a solution to improve sorghum production in an area severely threatened by food insecurity where households are reduced to consuming typically one meal a day  (Gnon &amp; Azouma, 2018) .</p><p>To overcome this problem, taking into account the phenomenon of drought, the scarcity and irregularity of rainfall during the sowing and crop growth period, supplementary irrigation is presented as an alternative towards mitigating the effects of water deficit  (Diarra et al., 2015;   Fadina &amp; Barjolle, 2018) . Studies on supplementary irrigation have shown the importance of this practice in correcting the water deficit of crops in order to improve yields. This practice will make it possible to guarantee minimum production whatever the climatic conditions by maintaining a satisfactory water reserve in the soil  (Berry et al., 2017;   Fadina &amp; Barjolle, 2018) . The objective of this study was to determine the effect of supplementary irrigation on the related parameters such as panicle length and yield of sorghum crops in the Dry Savannah region of Togo.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area</title><p>The study area is the Dry Savannah region of Togo, located between the parallels 9˚25 and 11˚ North latitude and the meridian 0˚ and 1˚ East longitude. It is bordered to the North by Burkina-Faso, to the West by Ghana, to the East by Benin and to the South by the humid savannah (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). With an area of 20,321 km<sup>2</sup>, rainfall is 1000 to 1300 mm/year  (REEM, 2022)  with a Sudano-Guinean climate in the south and tropical in the north. The average annual rainfall recorded at the experimental site (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), for the period March to October 2022,</p><p>was 1159.5 mm  (CARTO, 2022) . Temperatures vary from 39˚ to 17˚ in the dry season and from 34˚ to 22˚ (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) in the rainy season  (REEM, 2022) . The soil of the study area is the tropical ferruginous type with concretions made up of granite and gneiss, highly degraded with a very marked agricultural influence  (ITRA, 2005) .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Plant Material</title><p>The plant material used consisted of the variety of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) grown in the Dry Savannahs zone (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Among the varieties grown in the study area, the earliest-maturity available for extension was tested in response to climate change phenomena, in order to evaluate the yield of the crop. The particularity of this variety, unlike those cultivated in the area by producers, lies in its cycle which is 110 days, shorter than that of the local variety, whose cycle reaches 140 days.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Characteristics of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) variety tested</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Varieties</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Days to maturity</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Plant height (cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Panicle type</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Seed color</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mass of 1000 grains (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Grain texture</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Potential yield (t/ha)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sorvato 28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100 - 110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >210 - 220</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Semi- compact</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Red</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Horned - toothed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 4</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Source:  (FAO, 2008) .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Setting up the Trial on Station</title><p>The test was carried out during the long rainy season from June to October 2022 for the first implementation and from July to November for the repetition at the AREJ center in Cinkass&#233;, located at latitude 11˚6'34.4898&quot; North latitude and 0˚0'6.13512&quot; west longitude. The soil of the study area is the tropical ferruginous type with concretions made up of granite and gneiss, highly degraded due to agricultural influence  (ITRA, 2005) . The experimental design adopted is Completely Random Block with three repetitions with three treatments. Sorvato 28, sorghum variety performance was tested under two irrigation techniques, furrow and the Californian system. Individual plots area of was 38.4 m<sup>2</sup> (8 m &#215; 4.8 m) each. Sowing was carried out on June 23<sup>th</sup> 2022 for the first trials and July 1<sup>st</sup> for the repetition on blocks arranged perpendicular to the slope to achieve successful irrigation. Sorghum variety Sorvato 28 is sown according to the cropping pattern recommended by extension agricultural service in the study area. Sowing spacing was 0.80 m distance between lines and 0.40 m between two consecutive pockets on a line giving a density of 62,500 plants∙ha<sup>−1</sup>.</p><p>The trials were conducted according to the following technical itinerary: clearing, adding enriched compost (5 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>), ploughing, sowing, weeding at the 15<sup>th</sup>, 30<sup>th</sup> and 45<sup>th</sup> day after sowing. The applying of mineral fertilization, specifically NKP 15-15-15 (150 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) and Urea 46% (50 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) at the 15<sup>th </sup>and 30<sup>th</sup> after planting for NKP 15-15-15 and 45<sup>th</sup> day from sowing for urea as recommended. Additionally, crop protection against armyworm was implemented by spraying hemacot on plant using sprayer followed by harvesting at november for the first year and no harvesting for the second implementation. Zea mays and vegetables are the crops usually grown on the experimental plot.</p><p>The treatments were as follow:</p><p>&#183; Treatment (T<sub>0</sub>): control plot under rainfed conditions;</p><p>&#183; Treatment (T<sub>1</sub>): supplementary irrigation from flowering to grain filling stage;</p><p>&#183; Treatment (T<sub>2</sub>): supplementary irrigation from planting to grain filling stage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>);</p><p>&#183; Two experimental set-ups were used for each irrigation technique, on the experimental site.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Rates of nutrients applied in the form of enriched compost</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total nitrogen (N)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Assimilable Phosphate (P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Soluble potassium (K<sub>2</sub>O)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Organic carbon</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >pH (1: 20)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Corresponding quantitity of nutrient (kg ha<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >397</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Source: Togolese Institute of Agronomic Research (ITRA)/Laboratory Department/Analysis report.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Irrigations Techniques</title><p>Furrow irrigation consisted of creating and supplying water through a pipe to small parallel trenches in the ground to transport water to the feet of the plants. In this practice, the plants were generally installed on the ridges  (FAO, 1990) . This technique required prior site planning to take account of the topography, and waste water.</p><p>The Californian irrigation system consisted of bringing irrigation water to the crops through rigid PVC pressure pipes with a diameter of 40 - 50 mm buried at a depth of 0.5 m in order to protect them from UV rays and agricultural works. Intakes were connected to these rigid pipes at regular intervals of 18 - 36 m. A watering hose was connected to the intakes for crop irrigation  (WOCAT, 2018) . Furrow and Californian system was tested on a different experimental set-up.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Determination of the Crop’s Water Needs</title><p>In order to know the quantity of water to bring to each plot, the water needs of the crop were evaluated by the Cropwat 8.0 software. Supplementary irrigation using a borehole was carried out as soon as the rains stopped for at least two days after sowing or following a short and light rainfall that could not satisfy the crop’s daily needs during this period. The required irrigation per decade is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. Determination of the flow rate of the sprinklers allowed respect of the watering time that could satisfy the daily needs of the sorghum crop.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Agronomic Parameters</title><p>The agronomic parameters studied were: length of panicle, mass of 1000 grains (to provide information on how yields are achieved and any problems the plant may have encountered during its development) and yield.</p><p>Sorghum yield was determined by formula (1):</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Evaluation of the decadal water requirements of sorghum on the experimental plot</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Month</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Decade</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stage</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Coefficient Cultural (Kc)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ETc (mm/decade)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective rainfall (mm/decade)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Irrigation required (mm/decade)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >June</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3<sup>rd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Initial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >July</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1<sup>st</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Initial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >July</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2<sup>nd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Growth</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >July</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3<sup>rd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Growth</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >August</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1<sup>st</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Growth</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >August</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2<sup>nd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mid-season</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >August</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3<sup>rd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mid-season</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >September</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1<sup>st</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mid-season</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >September</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2<sup>nd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mid-season</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.3</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Sources: meteorological data from the Savannah region of Togo, 1980-2020 and cropwat 8.0; Etc: crop evapo-transpiration.</p><p>R = P ⋅ 10000 S (1)</p><p>R = yield (in t/ha);</p><p>S = plot area (m<sup>2</sup>);</p><p>P = mass of grain harvested on the elementary plot (t).</p><p>The statistical analysis of the collected data was carried out using Xlstat and SPSS software. The Student-Newman-Keuls test at the 5% threshold was performed to determine the different statistics.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Effect of Supplementary Irrigation on Panicle Length</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> summarizes the results obtained on the average panicle length of sorghum 28. The highest value of panicle length, 24.42 cm, was recorded under the T<sub>2</sub> irrigation treatment in Californian system, followed by the T<sub>1</sub> treatment, 21.20 cm. On the plots under the furrow irrigation, this average panicle length measured under the T<sub>1</sub> treatment was 23.53 cm, followed by the T<sub>2</sub> treatment at 21.62 cm. Not depending of the irrigation technique, the average panicle length of the T<sub>0</sub> treatments did not exceed 16 cm. The analysis of variance shows that there was a significant difference at the 5% level between irrigations techniques. These results show that irrigation technique has an effect on panicle length. Although the test conditions are not geographically the same, the results confirm the work of  Abera et al. (2020) ,  Yemane and Habtamu (2019)  who showed through their study that the highest sorghum panicle lengths are obtained under crops that have obtained the full water requirement through irrigation. The</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Average panicle length, of Sorvato 28 under Californian and furrow irrigation obtained in controlled conditions</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average panicle length (Mean &#177; SD)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >California irrigation system</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>0</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.54 &#177; 0.55<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.20 &#177; 0.67<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.42 &#177; 2.33<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Furrow irrigation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>0</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.24 &#177; 0.42<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.53 &#177; 1.45<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.62 &#177; 0.88<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.557</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >p</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>T<sub>0</sub>: control plot under rainfed conditions; T<sub>1</sub>: supplementary irrigation from flowering to grain filling stage; T<sub>2</sub>: supplementary irrigation from planting to grain filling stage.</p><p>availability of water from planting to grain filling stage (T<sub>2</sub> treatment) and from the flowering to grain filling stage (T<sub>1</sub> treatment) resulted in the longest panicle length. Supplementary irrigation contributed to the improvement of the panicle length of sorghum  (Carsky et al., 2002;   Derese et al., 2018;   Sun et al., 2018) .</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Effect of Supplementary Irrigation on 1000 Grains Mass and Grain Yield</title><p>The result of the analysis of the mass of 1000 grains is for the first year of implementation. In fact, during the repetition trial, panicle formation coincided with the period of heavy rain, causing abortion. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> shows identical average values whatever the treatment. These results show that the irrigation technique has no effect on the 1000 grains mass obtained. Statistical analysis did not reveal any significant difference at the 5% level. Similar results are obtained by  Bruns (2015)  who stated through their study that supplementary irrigation seems not to bring effects on 1000-grain mass.</p><p>Grain yields of sorghum variety obtained on station are recorded in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>. Low yields were obtained under treatments T<sub>0</sub> and T<sub>1</sub>, with respective averages of 0.71 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup> and 1.17 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup> for the Californian irrigation system; 0.00 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup> and 0.43 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup> for the furrow irrigation system. Lower yield is due to plant losses where there is not supplementary irrigation. Some treatment yields are zero, as a result of abortion phenomena occurring during pollination, another consequence of climate change on sorghum production. The best average grain yield was recorded under the T<sub>2</sub> treatment, which is 2.06 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup> under the California irrigation system. In fact, most of the plants that received supplementary irrigation produced panicles early, unlike the rain-fed plants, which experienced delayed growth and were hit by panicle abortion. These results support the hypotheses that supplementary irrigation contributes to yield improvement. The best yield is obtained from some treatment that present a good panicle length average. The</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Average mass of 1000 grains and grain yield of Sorvato 28 under Californian and furrow irrigation obtained in controlled conditions</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mass of 1000 grains (Mean &#177; SD)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Grain yield (t/ha) (Mean &#177; SD)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >California irrigation system</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>0</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.87 &#177; 0.33<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71 &#177; 0.71<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.97 &#177; 1.00<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17 &#177; 0.58<sup>ab</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.60 &#177; 0.88<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.06 &#177; 0.35<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Furrow irrigation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>0</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.93 &#177; 0.58<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43 &#177; 0.43<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.37 &#177; 1.45<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00 &#177; 0.00<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.33 &#177; 0.33<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97 &#177; 0.57<sup>ab</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.763</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.810</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >p</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.069</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.006</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>T<sub>0</sub>: control plot under rainfed conditions; T<sub>1</sub>: supplementary irrigation from flowering to grain filling stage; T<sub>2</sub>: supplementary irrigation from planting to grain filling stage.</p><p>results show the positive effect of panicle length on yield. The longer the panicle is, the more numerous is the grain that defining a good yield.</p><p>The grain yields of the sorghum variety obtained are the results of the combined effect of organic, mineral fertilization and supplementary irrigation. These results confirm those of  Fox and Rockstr&#246;m (2003)  and  Andom et al. (2017)  who demonstrated through their study that supplementary irrigation and fertilization can increase crop yields. Also the work of  Mohammed and Misganaw (2022)  carried out on the modelling of sorghum crop showed that the increase in sorghum yields will be conditioned by the application of supplementary irrigation and nitrogen fertilization to sorghum crops in semi-arid zones. Supplementary irrigation increased yields by about 1 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup>  (Getachew et al., 2021) . The zero yields achieved on some plots in the first year of implementation and during the trial repetition are due to the effect of abiotic factors on the sorghum crop. Indeed, increased rainfall during the fertilisation phase of sorghum in our trials resulted in flower abortion of some plants and thus reduced number of grains per panicle or no seed formation  (Jabereldar et al., 2017) . Low yields in treatments T<sub>0</sub> and T<sub>1</sub> are the effects of water stress in the early vegetative phase leading to reduction in panicle length, panicle weight and number of grains per panicle  (d’Arc Coulibaly et al., 2020;   Jabereldar et al., 2017) . The comparison of these results with T<sub>2</sub> treatments highlights the effects of supplementary irrigation in improving sorghum crop yields  (Chen et al., 2021;   Sigua et al., 2020;   Wale et al., 2019) .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>This study shows that supplementary irrigation contributes effectively to yield improvement. Indeed, compared to the T<sub>1</sub> treatment in furrow irrigation, the yield increased by 52.91% for the T<sub>2</sub> treatment under Californian irrigation system. Average panicle length is one of the parameters influencing grain yield of sorghum unlike 1000 grain mass which has no significant effect on yield. Supplementary irrigation of sorghum during the sowing and flowering periods is a recommended practice in dry savannah areas with low rainfall at the beginning of the cropping season. The absence of supplementary irrigation for treatment T<sub>1</sub> had a degressive effect on yield due to the loss of young plants. Watering during the days following sowing (Treatment T<sub>2</sub>) has a considerable effect on grain yield of sorghum. This study will help producers in the dry Savannahs of Togo to reduce crop losses that can affect yields due to pockets of drought, by implementing supplementary irrigation in the context of climate change. In addition, it would enable agriculture’s extension workers to determine a new sowing date conform to sorghum 28, so that to avoid panicle formation falling within the period of heavy rains, which can cause panicle abortion.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We acknowledge the contribution of PARESI project of the University of Lom&#233; by his financial and material support, AREJ center for accepting the installation of the trials on their plots.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Funding</title><p>This research was supported by PARESI (project to support the implementation of higher education reform in science and engineering) of University of Lom&#233;.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Atiglo-Gbenou, A., Azouma, Y. O., &amp; Sogbedji, J. M. (2024). Effect of Supplementary Irrigation on the Yield of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) in the Context of Climate Change in the Dry Savannahs of Togo. American Journal of Climate Change, 13, 163-174. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2024.132009</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.133837-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abera</surname><given-names> K.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Tana</surname><given-names> T.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Takele</surname><given-names> A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2020</year>)<article-title>. Effect of Rates and Time of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on Yield and Yield Components of Sorghum [&lt;i&gt;Sorghum bicolor&lt;/i&gt; (L.) Moench] at Raya Valley, Northern Ethiopia</article-title><source> &lt;i&gt;International Journal of Plant Breeding</source><volume> 7</volume>,<fpage> &lt;/i&gt;598</fpage>-<lpage>612</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adewi, E., Badameli, K. M., &amp; Dubreuil, V. (2010). Evolution des saisons des pluies potentiellement utiles au Togo de 1950 &amp;#224; 2000. &lt;i&gt;Climatologie&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;, 7, &lt;/i&gt;89-107. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.4267/climatologie.489</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adjoussi, P. (2000). Changement climatique global: &amp;#201;valuation de l&amp;#8217;&amp;#233;volution des param&amp;#232;tres au Togo. &lt;br&gt;http://hdl.handle.net/1834/2754 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">African Union (2022). &lt;i&gt;Compact&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; Togo &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;pour&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;l&amp;#8217;Alimentation&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; et &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;l&amp;#8217;Agriculture&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;. &lt;/i&gt;Rapport annuel.&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;https://www.afdb.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/togo_compact_pour_lalimentation_et_lagriculture.pdf </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andom, O., Naz, H., Ogbazghi, W., Naz, A., Khan, H. H., &amp; Singh, B. (2017). Nitrogen and Supplementary Irrigation Requirements of Sorghum (&lt;i&gt;Sorghum bicolor&lt;/i&gt; L.) at Hamelmalo, Semiarid Regions of Eritrea (East Africa). &lt;i&gt;International Journal of Agricu&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;l&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;tural Invention, 2,&lt;/i&gt; 124-129. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.46492/IJAI/2017.2.2.3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Atiglo-Gbenou, A., &amp; Azouma, O. Y. (2023). Analysis of the Superposition of Meteorological Data and Maize (&lt;i&gt;Zea&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;mays&lt;/i&gt;) Planting Periods in Order to Reduce Production Losses Due to Climate Change in the Dry Savannah Zone of Togo. &lt;i&gt;American Journal of Agricultural Science, Engineering, and Technology, 7, &lt;/i&gt;39-43. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.54536/ajaset.v7i1.1175</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berry, P., Yassin, F., Belcher, K., &amp; Lindenschmidt, K.-E. (2017). An Economic Assessment of Local Farm Multi-Purpose Surface Water Retention Systems under Future Climate Uncertainty. &lt;i&gt;Sustainability, 9,&lt;/i&gt; Article 456. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/su9030456</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bruns, H. A. (2015). Irrigation, Seeding Rates, and Row Type Effects on Grain Sorghum in the Midsouth. &lt;i&gt;Agronomy Journal, 107,&lt;/i&gt; 9-12. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj14.0297</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carsky, R., Ndikawa, R., &amp; Singh, L. (2002). Establishment of Optimum Plant Densities for Dry Season Sorghum Grown on Vertisols in the Semiarid Zones of Cameroon.&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;African Crop Science Journal&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;, 10,&lt;/i&gt; 23-30. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/acsj.v10i1.27554</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">CARTO (2022). &lt;i&gt;Centre &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;d&amp;#8217;Animation&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Rurale&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Ogaro&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;(&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;TOGO).&lt;/i&gt; Rapport d&amp;#8217;activit&amp;#233; annuelle.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, Y., Marek, G. W., Marek, T. H., Porter, D. O., Brauer, D. K., &amp; Srinivasan, R. (2021). Simulating the Effects of Agricultural Production Practices on Water Conservation and Crop Yields Using an Improved SWAT Model in the Texas High Plains, USA. &lt;i&gt;Agricultural Water Management&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;, 244, &lt;/i&gt;Article 106574. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106574</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">d&amp;#8217;Arc Coulibaly, P., Okae-Anti, D., Ouattara, B., Sawadogo, J., &amp; Sedogo, M. (2020). Effect of Heat Stress on Soil Fertility and Sowing Date on Yield Components of Sorghum in the Sudanian Agro-Ecological Zone of Burkina Faso. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Agricultural and Crop Research, 8, &lt;/i&gt;140-146. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.33495/jacr_v8i7.20.116</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Derese, S. A., Shimelis, H., Mwadzingeni, L., &amp; Laing, M. (2018). Agro-Morphological Characterisation and Selection of Sorghum Landraces. &lt;i&gt;Acta&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Agriculturae&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Scandinavica&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;, Section B&amp;#8212;Soil &amp; Plant Science, 68, &lt;/i&gt;585-595. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2018.1448884</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diarra, A., Da Silveria, S., &amp; Zorom, M. (2015). Irrigation de compl&amp;#233;ment et information climatique: De la recherche au renforcement des capacit&amp;#233;s d&amp;#8217;adaptation institutionnelles et communautaires au Sahel. &lt;br&gt;https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/01f7607d-97a1-491a-8ccc-d383f5482a84/content </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DSID (2019). &lt;i&gt;Agriculture: 886.360 &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;tonnes&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; de &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;ma&amp;#239;s&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;produits&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; entre 2018 &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;et&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; 2019&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;br&gt;https://manationtogo.com/agriculture-886-360-tonnes-de-mais-produits-entre-2018-et-2019/ </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fadina, A. M. R., &amp; Barjolle, D. (2018). Farmers&amp;#8217; Adaptation Strategies to Climate Change and Their Implications in the Zou Department of South Benin. &lt;i&gt;Environments, 5,&lt;/i&gt; Article 15. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/environments5010015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAO (1990).&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Gestion&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; des &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;eaux&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; en irrigation&lt;/i&gt;. Manuel de formation, m&amp;#233;thodes d&amp;#8217;irrigation, 74 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAO (2008).&lt;i&gt; Catalogue &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;ouest&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;africain&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; des &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;esp&amp;#232;ces&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;et&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;vari&amp;#233;t&amp;#233;s&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;v&amp;#233;g&amp;#233;tales&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;. &lt;/i&gt;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fox, P., &amp; Rockstr&amp;#246;m, J. (2003). Supplemental Irrigation for Dry-Spell Mitigation of Rainfed Agriculture in the Sahel. &lt;i&gt;Agricultural Water Management, 61,&lt;/i&gt; 29-50. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(03)00008-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Getachew, F., Bayabil, H. K., Hoogenboom, G., Teshome, F. T., &amp; Zewdu, E. (2021). Irrigation and Shifting Planting Date as Climate Change Adaptation Strategies for Sorghum. &lt;i&gt;Agricultural Water Management, 255,&lt;/i&gt; Article 106988. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106988</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gnon, T., &amp; Azouma, Y. O. (2018). D&amp;#233;marche d&amp;#8217;int&amp;#233;gration du changement climatique dans l&amp;#8217;am&amp;#233;lioration de la production c&amp;#233;r&amp;#233;ali&amp;#232;re des savanes s&amp;#232;ches du Togo. &lt;i&gt;Bulletin de la &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Recherche&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Agronomique&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; du &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;B&amp;#233;nin&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;(&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;BRAB)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;,&lt;/i&gt; 12-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hatfield, J. L., Boote, K. J., Kimball, B. A., Ziska, L., Izaurralde, R. C., Ort, D., Thomson, A. M., &amp; Wolfe, D. (2011). Climate Impacts on Agriculture: Implications for Crop Production. &lt;i&gt;Agronomy Journal, 103,&lt;/i&gt; 351-370. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2010.0303</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ITRA (2005). &lt;i&gt;Stratification du Togo en zones &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;homog&amp;#232;nes&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; pour la &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;recherche&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;agronomique&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;. &lt;/i&gt;Rapport d&amp;#8217;activit&amp;#233;, 104 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jabereldar</surname><given-names> A. A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> El Naim</surname><given-names> A. M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Abdalla</surname><given-names> A. A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Dagash</surname><given-names> Y. M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2017</year>)<article-title>. Effect of Water Stress on Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Sorghum (&lt;i&gt;Sorghum bicolor&lt;/i&gt; L. Moench) in Semi-Arid Environment</article-title><source> &lt;i&gt;International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry</source><volume> 7</volume>,<fpage>&lt;/i&gt; 1</fpage>-<lpage>6</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mohammed, A., &amp; Misganaw, A. (2022). Modeling Future Climate Change Impacts on Sorghum (&lt;i&gt;Sorghum bicolor&lt;/i&gt;) Production with Best Management Options in Amhara Region, Ethiopia. &lt;i&gt;CABI Agriculture and Bioscience, 3,&lt;/i&gt; Article No. 22. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s43170-022-00092-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rao, C. S., Lal, R., Prasad, J. V., Gopinath, K. A., Singh, R., Jakkula, V. S., Sahrawat, K. L., Venkateswarlu, B., Sikka, A. K., &amp; Virmani, S. M. (2015). Potential and Challenges of Rainfed Farming in India. &lt;i&gt;Advances in Agronomy, 133, &lt;/i&gt;113-181. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2015.05.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">REEM (2022). &lt;i&gt;Premier rapport &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;sur&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;l&amp;#8217;&amp;#233;tat&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; de &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;l&amp;#8217;environnement&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;marin&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; du Togo&lt;/i&gt;. Projet d&amp;#8217;Am&amp;#233;lioration du Syst&amp;#232;me d&amp;#8217;Information Environnementale au Togo (PASIET).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sigua, G. C., Stone, K. C., Bauer, P. J., &amp; Szogi, A. A. (2020). Efficacy of Supplemental Irrigation and Nitrogen Management on Enhancing Nitrogen Availability and Urease Activity in Soils with Sorghum Production. &lt;i&gt;Sustainability, 12,&lt;/i&gt; Article 8358. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208358</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sun, J., Gao, P., Wang, R., Niu, X., &amp; Wang, B. (2018). Technology and the Effects of Supplemental Irrigation with Catchment Rainwater on Maize in the Hilly-Arid Area of Northern China. &lt;i&gt;Transactions of the ASABE, 61, &lt;/i&gt;549-557. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.12430</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Togo, A. (2019). &lt;i&gt;Effets&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; de la &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;fertilisation&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;et&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; de la date de semis &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;sur&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; des &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;vari&amp;#233;t&amp;#233;s&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; de &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;sorgho&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &amp;#224; double usage.&lt;/i&gt; M&amp;#233;moire de fin de cycle Universit&amp;#233; IPR/IFRA de Katibougou, 50 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wale, A., Sebnie, W., Girmay, G., &amp; Beza, G. (2019). Evaluation of the Potentials of Supplementary Irrigation for Improvement of Sorghum Yield in Wag-Himra, North Eastern, Amhara, Ethiopia. &lt;i&gt;Cogent Food &amp; Agriculture, 5, &lt;/i&gt;Article 1664203. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2019.1664203</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WOCAT (2018).&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Syst&amp;#232;me&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Californien&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;d&amp;#8217;irrigation&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &amp;#224; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;basse&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;pression&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133837-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yemane</surname><given-names> M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Habtamu</surname><given-names> T. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2019</year>)<article-title>. Response of Sorghum (&lt;i&gt;Sorghum bicolor &lt;/i&gt;L.) to Supplementary Irrigation in Raya Valley, Northern Ethiopia</article-title><source> &lt;i&gt;International Journal of &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Agr&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;i&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;culture and Biosciences</source><volume> 8</volume>,<fpage> &lt;/i&gt;1</fpage>-<lpage>5</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>