<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCT</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Cancer Therapy</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2151-1934</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jct.2024.156023</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JCT-133810</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Epidemiological and Histopathological Profile of Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Study in the Pathology Department of the University Clinics of Kinshasa
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rive</surname><given-names>Lukuaku Buanza</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>J&amp;#233;r&amp;#233;mie</surname><given-names>Okumadi Lukuke</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fabrice</surname><given-names>Bokambandja Lolangwa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Andy</surname><given-names>Mbangama Muela</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Matthieu</surname><given-names>Loposo Nkumu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fran&amp;#231;ois</surname><given-names>Beya Kabongo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Renault</surname><given-names>Kambere Sitamuina</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jean-Marie</surname><given-names>Mpolesha Kabongo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Surgery, Urology, University Clinics of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, DRC</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Gyneco-Obstetrics Department, University Clinics of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, DRC</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Pathological Anatomy, University Clinics of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, DRC</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Faculty of Medicine, Bel Campus Technological University, Kinshasa, DRC</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>13</day><month>06</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>239</fpage><lpage>249</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>24,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2024</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>11,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>14,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  <b>Background:</b> Prostate cancer, the most common male cancer, represents a real public health problem in terms of its frequency and severity in different countries around the world. It disproportionately affects people of African descent wherever they live in the world 
  [1]. To the best of our knowledge, its extent and particularities in the African environment are not well known. 
  <b>Objective:</b> To determine the epidemiological and histopathological profile of prostate cancer in the CUK anatomopathology department. 
  <b>Methodology:</b> This is a retrospective study conducted at the University Clinics of Kinshasa Anapathology Department from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2022, a period of 8 years. Word processing and tables were entered using the Hp brand computer, with Microsoft Office WORD 2016 software. Data analysis was performed with SPSS version 22.0 software. Results were presented in tables and figures. 
  <b>Results: </b>Prostate was diagnosed in 132 cases, 
  i.e. 1.58% of all CUK laboratory analyses and 8% of cancers diagnosed. The age group most affected was 66-75 years, 
  i.e. 59% of all subjects. Adenocarcinoma was the most frequent histological type, and biopsy dominated in 111 cases (84.1%). 
  <b>Conclusion:</b> Prostate cancer is a real public health problem. Worldwide, and in the Democratic Republic of Congo, it is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men, and the leading cause of cancer-related death in men. In the DRC, because of the delay in consulting our patients and the weakness of systematic screening, patients are seen at an advanced stage of the disease. Treatment is multidisciplinary, involving surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy (including targeted therapies). Patient awareness and screening campaigns will help to considerably reduce the delay in diagnosis and the morbidity and mortality associated with prostate cancer.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Prostate</kwd><kwd> Gleason Score</kwd><kwd> Democratic Republic of Congo</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Prostate cancer (PCa), the most common male cancer, represents a real public health problem in terms of its frequency and severity in different countries around the world. It disproportionately affects people of African descent wherever they live in the world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133810-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>Its incidence is generally characterized by a variability ranging from 1 to 30/100,000 inhabitants, depending on the geographical and/or ethnic characteristics of the populations.</p><p>This disparity implies the multiple interaction of environmental and genetic factors in its genesis. It is currently accepted that the African group as a whole is most at risk of developing (PCa).</p><p>According to GLOBOCAN 2022 estimates, prostate cancer is second only to bronchopulmonary cancer (14.2%) in the top 5 most common cancers in men [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133810-ref2">2</xref>] . And in both sexes, it ranks 4th after colorectal cancer, which ranks 3rd at 7.3%. The lowest incidences were recorded in Asian populations, and the highest in Northern Europe. Very high incidences are observed in Oceania and North America, mainly in the USA and Canada, where they are among the highest in the world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133810-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133810-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>In Africa, the overall incidence of (PCa) was 26.8 per 100,000 inhabitants. It varied considerably between the North and South of the Sahara (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> see book). The incidence of this disease was 10.6 per 100,000 inhabitants in North Africa after lung cancer, and 27.9 per 100,000 inhabitants in Sub-Saharan Africa before liver cancer. In sub-Saharan Africa, incidences were 67.9 in the SAR, 34.7 in Guinea, 31.1 in the DRC, 37.4 in the Republic of Congo, 27.2 in Sierra Leone and 25.0 per 100,000 inhabitants in Angola [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133810-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133810-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>Moreover, in the Democratic Republic of Congo, the absence of a national cancer registry is a serious handicap to the real epidemioclinical evaluation of prostate cancer (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Nevertheless, some studies have been carried out, among those of Kambere’s [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133810-ref7">7</xref>] on Epidemiological profile and histologic based outcome of prostatic cancer in Congolese patient following Gleason’s classification, Ngandu on PCa prevalence in Mbujimayi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133810-ref8">8</xref>] , PCa risk factors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133810-ref9">9</xref>] , PSA value in PCa diagnosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133810-ref10">10</xref>] , PCa histopronostic caracteristiques [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133810-ref11">11</xref>]</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Estimated incidence rates of prostate cancer (&#215;10<sup>5</sup> pa) in different regions of the world</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Regions of the world</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Incidence</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Afrique sub-saharienne</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Afrique du Nord</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Afrique du Sud</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Am&#233;rique du Nord</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Am&#233;rique Centrale</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Am&#233;rique du Sud</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cara&#239;be</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Asie de l’Est</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Asie du Sud-Est</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Asie de l’Ouest</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Europe Centrale de l’Est</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Europe du Nord</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Europe du Sud</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Europe de l’Ouest</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oc&#233;anie</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.9<sup> </sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Source: GLOBOCAN 2012.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Histological nature</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Diagnosis</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >n = 132</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Adenocarcinoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.4%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Squamous cell carcinoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.6%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Method</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Type, Setting and Period of Study</title><p>This is a retrospective study carried out in the Pathological Anatomy Laboratory of the University Clinics of Kinshasa. The present study took place in the Department of Pathological Anatomy of the University Clinics of Kinshasa. Duration: January1, 2015 to December 31, 2022.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Study Population</title><p>Our sampling being of convenience, we had to consider all the patients listed during the period of the study, in whom the diagnoses of prostate cancers was confirmed after rereading and met the inclusion criteria retained.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Case Inclusion Criteria</title><p>All prostate biopsy blocks and slides, resection specimens, adenectomies and</p><p>radical prostatectomies.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Histological Examination Procedure</title><p>All specimens were fixed in 10% formalin, dehydrated and cleared, embedded in kerosene, microtomed at 3 - 5 microns and stained with hematoxylin and eosin.</p><p>Slides were reread using an OLYMPUS BX41 co-observation microscope. The final diagnosis of prostate cancer was made after all slides had been reread by two Pathologists as independent readers. In the event of discrepancies in the results, the third Pathologist was called in.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Statistical analysis was carried out in two stages.</p><p>- Univariate analysis: Categorical (qualitative) variables were summarized by frequency tables or graphs and percentages. In addition, quantitative variables were described in terms of medians or means, depending on whether the distribution is non-symmetrical or symmetrical.</p><p>- Bivariate analysis: The search for a correlation or relationship between the various qualitative parameters was carried out using Pearson’s Chi-square test or Fisher Exact when one of the observed frequencies is less than 5, which consists in calculating the correlation coefficient P. The significance threshold was set at 5%: the test is significant if P ≤ 0.05.</p><p>Data were coded and processed using Excel software.</p><p>Analysis was performed using SPSS version 20 software.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Ethical Considerations</title><p>Confidentiality and anonymity were respected.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Frequency of prostate cancer on all analyzes in the pathological anatomy laboratory.</p><p>The figure shows that (PCa) accounts for 1.58% of all analyses carried out in the CUK Anapath laboratory (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>PROSTATE CANCER FREQUENCY IN ALL CANCERS (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>)</p><p>AGE OF SUBJECTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER</p><p>This <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> shows that the 66-75 age group predominates, with 59% of all subjects.</p><p>HISTOLOGICAL TYPES</p><p>This table shows that Adenocarcinoma predominates with 87.8% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Type of sample</p><p>In our study, as shown in the table, biopsy dominated in 111 cases (84.1%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><p>DISTRIBUTION OF PATHOLOGIES OBSERVED IN THE PROSTATE</p><p>The table shows that non-cancerous lesions account for 51.3% of all pathologies observed.</p><p>DISTRIBUTION OF NON-CANCEROUS LESIONS IN THE PROSTATE</p><p>GLEASON SCORE (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>)</p><p>63.8% of prostate cancers are high-risk (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p><p>ISUP CLASSIFICATION</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Type of sampl</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nature</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >n = 132</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Prostatic adenomectomy specimen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.8%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Prostate biopsies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.1%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RTUP chips</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.6%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Radical prostatectomy specimen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of pathologies observed in the prostate</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Diagnosis</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Prostate cancer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.7%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Non-cancerous lesions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >139</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.3%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Of the 132 cases of prostate cancer diagnosed, 35 patients were classified as ISUP 1, i.e. 27%, 6 patients were classified as ISUP 2 (3 + 4), i.e. 5%, 7 patients were classified as ISUP 2 (4 + 3), i.e. 5%, 40 patients were classified as ISUP 4, i.e. 30%, and 44 patients were classified as ISUP 5, i.e. 33% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>This was a retrospective study. In our series, the frequency of prostate cancer represented 1.8% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) of all laboratory analyses during the period of our study, in contrast to the study conducted by Halidou M et al. in Niger, which revealed 3.4% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133810-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>This frequency differs from that of Kambere et al. who found a frequency of 0.12% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133810-ref7">7</xref>] , and also from that of Lomba DIMONGO who noted a frequency of 0.3% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133810-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>The somewhat reduced frequency may be explained by the population’s poor access to diagnosis due to a lack of adequate screening systems, but also by awareness of the seriousness of this pathology and the value of early diagnosis at a stage when the cancer is potentially curable.</p><p>Biopsy was the most common type of sampling in 111 of the 132 cases (See <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, i.e. 84.1% and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). This result is justified by the fact that an increase in PSA above 4 nano-grams/milliliter is an absolute indication for prostate biopsy, especially if accompanied by information about cancer on digital rectal examination. Although in our series we have little clinical information on PSA levels, the little we do have indicates that the PSA level was above 4 nano-grams/milliliter (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>).</p><p>In this study, prostate cancer accounted for 8% of all cancers in the pathological anatomy department of the University Clinics of Kinshasa, while the GLOBOCCAN 2022 revelations show that prostate cancer accounted for 7.3%, a result that is superimposed on the findings of the study by A. Ouatara et al. which revealed a frequency of 12% in Benin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133810-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><p>Studies show that frequencies are disproportionately high in different regions.</p><p>The age group most affected is 66 - 75. This trend had been more or less the same in most studies. Many authors confirm that, worldwide, prostate cancer remains the cancer of the elderly.</p><p>The age group most affected is 66 - 75 (See <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). This trend has been more or less the same in most studies. Many authors confirm that, worldwide, prostate cancer remains the cancer of the elderly, such as NGANDU TJ et al. who state that the majority were aware of the seriousness of the cancer, and 92% that it affected older men [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133810-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>Prostatic adenocarcinoma was the most common histological type, accounting for 92.4% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). This result is consistent with studies by various authors in most cases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133810-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>In our series, 63.8% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>) of prostate cancers were high-risk, a higher trend than in the study by Halidou M [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133810-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of high-risk prostate cancers (D’Amico classification)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Low risk (Gleason ≤ 6)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Intermediate risk (Gleason = 7)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >High-risk (Gleason &gt; 7)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Or 26.5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Or 9.7%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Or 63.8%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>In our series, histological findings according to ISUP group were as follows: ISUP 1 represented 27%, ISUP 2 10%, ISUP 4 30% and ISUP 5 33% of cases, a result which differs from that of Halidou M et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133810-ref6">6</xref>] , whose ISUP 1 was 2.70%, ISUP 2 24.32%, ISUP 4 43.24% and ISUP 5 10.83%. This would be justified by the fact that in our study the number of cases is approximately double the number of cancers diagnosed in the Halidou M et al. series, i.e. 132 cases in our study and 74 cases for Halidou M et al.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>Prostate cancer is a real public health problem. Worldwide, and in the Democratic Republic of Congo, it is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men, and the leading cause of cancer-related death in men. In the DRC, because of the delay in consulting our patients and the weakness of systematic screening, patients are seen at an advanced stage of the disease. Treatment is multidisciplinary, involving surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy (including targeted therapies). Patient awareness and screening campaigns will help to considerably reduce the delay in diagnosis and the morbidity and mortality associated with prostate cancer. Given the high incidence of prostate cancer in African countries in general, and in the Democratic Republic of Congo in particular, it is important for decision-makers to implement a prostate cancer screening program, with good coverage of the population of men at risk throughout the country, Equip health facilities with screening equipment and Pathological Anatomy Laboratories to ensure adequate care for men with precancerous and cancerous prostate lesions in the DRC. Use audiovisual programs to raise awareness of the potential importance of prostate cancer screening. Pathologists: Intensify meetings between Urologists and Pathologists to reinforce and update prostate cancer screening strategies.</p><p>To researchers, initiate a prospective multicenter study to establish the immunohistochemical profile of prostate cancers, in association with genotyping, and initiate a study to search for genetic mutations in prostate cancers, enabling targeted therapy.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Authors’ Contributions</title><p>All authors declare that they have read and approved the final version of this manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We are grateful to the Oncology Department of Nganda Hospital for providing us with the information we needed to write this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Buanza, R.L., Lukuke, J.O., Lolangwa, F.B., Muela, A.M., Nkumu, M.L., Kabongo, F.B., Sitamuina, R.K. and Kabongo, J.-M.M. (2024) Epidemiological and Histopathological Profile of Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Study in the Pathology Department of the University Clinics of Kinshasa. Journal of Cancer Therapy, 15, 239-249. https://doi.org/10.4236/jct.2024.156023</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.133810-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Punga-Maole, A.M., Moningo, D.M., Kayembe, P.K., Tshikuela, M.L. and Kabongo, J.M. (2008) Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in a Population of Employees of a Company in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo. Detection Rate and Nutritional and Geographical Risk Factors. &lt;i&gt;Progr&amp;#232;s en Urologie&lt;/i&gt;, 18, 512-518. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2008.04.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133810-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">International Agency for Research on Cancer, GLOBOCAN 2022. &lt;br&gt;https://gco.iarc.who.int/media/globocan/factsheets/populations/900-world-fact-sheet.pdf </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133810-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dimitri, M., Collins, P.W., Daniela Starmann, D., Savi, S., Claire Ross, C., Adams, M. and Marco Narducci, M. (2023) The World Foundation of Urology-C.F. 06477631003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133810-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Ervik, M., Dikshit, R., Eser, S., Mathers, C., Rebelo, M., Parkin, D.M., Forman, D. and Bray, F. (2013) GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldide: IARC Cancer Base No.11. &lt;i&gt;Inte&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;rnational Journal of Cancer&lt;/i&gt;, 5, 359-386.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133810-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chu, L.W., Ritchey, J., Devesa, S.S., Quraishi, S.M., Zhang, H.M. and Hsing, A.W. (2011) Prostate Cancer Incidence Rates in Africa. &lt;i&gt;Prostate Cancer&lt;/i&gt;, 2011, Article ID 947870. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/947870</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133810-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Halidou, M., Kodo, A., Diongol&amp;#233;, H., Zakou, A.R.H., Magagi, I. and Amadou, S. (2024) Le Cancer de la Prostate au Niger: Aspects Epid&amp;#233;miologiques Cliniques et Histologiques &amp;#224; l&amp;#8217;H&amp;#244;pital National de Zinder. &lt;i&gt;Health Sciences and Disease&lt;/i&gt;, 23. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133810-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kambere, S.R. and Kabongo, M.J.M. (2013) Epidemiological Profile and Histologic Based Outcome of Prostatic Cancer in Congolese Patient Following Gleason&amp;#8217;s Classification. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133810-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngandu, T.J., Punga, M.A., Kabongo, M.J.M., Lebwaze, M.B., Moningo, D. &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2015) Pr&amp;#233;valence du cancer de la prostate a Mbujimayi en R&amp;#233;publique D&amp;#233;mocratique du Congo. &lt;i&gt;Revue &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Medicale &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;des Grands Lacs&lt;/i&gt;, 4, 106-121. &lt;br&gt;https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293654251_Prevalence_du_cancer_de_la_prostate_a_Mbujimayi_en_Republique_Democratique_du_Congo </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133810-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngandu, T.J., Punga, M.A., Kabongo, M.J.M., Lebwaze, M.B., Moningo, D. &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2015) Facteurs de risque de cancer de la prostate &amp;#224; Mbujimayi.&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Revue Medicale des Grands Lacs&lt;/i&gt;, 4, 195-204. &lt;br&gt;https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293452488_Facteurs_de_risque_de_cancer_de_la_prostate_a_Mbujimayi </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133810-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngandu, T.J., Punga, M.A., Kabongo, M.J.M., Lebwaze, M.B., Moningo, D. &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2015) PSA Value in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133810-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngandu, T.J., Punga, M.A., Kabongo, M.J.M., Lebwaze, M.B., Moningo, D. &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2015) Prostate Cancer Histopronostic Caracteristiques.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133810-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lomba, D.O. (2016) Profil Anatomoclinique du cancer de la prostate &amp;#224; l&amp;#8217;IME-KIMPESE, Travail de fin d'&amp;#233;tudes, Facult&amp;#233; de M&amp;#233;decine Humaine, Universit&amp;#233; Protestante de Kimpese, 2015-2016.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133810-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ouattara, A. (2012) Epidemiology of Utological Cancers at the Hubert Koutoukou Maga National University Hospital Cotonou, Benin. Review of about 158 Cases of Urologic Cancers. &lt;i&gt;Progr&amp;#232;s &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;en Urologie&lt;/i&gt;, 22, 261-265. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2011.12.003</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>