<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Entomology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2331-1991</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ae.2024.123012</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AE-133764</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Contribution to the Knowledge of the Afrotropical Spilomelinae (Lepidoptera, Crambidae): A New Genus in the Tribe Nomophilini Kuznetzov &amp; Stekolnikov 1979 Based on Morphology and DNA Barcoding
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Michael</surname><given-names>Seizmair</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Entomology, Section Lepidoptera, SNSB Bavarian State Collection of Zoology Munich, Munich, Germany</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>06</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>155</fpage><lpage>169</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>18,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2024</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>10,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>13,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The new genus &lt;i&gt;Parathrausta&lt;/i&gt; &lt;b&gt;gen.n.&lt;/b&gt; in the subfamily Spilomelinae (Lepidoptera, Crambidae) is erected based on a series of specimens collected in the Afrotropical region of Saudi Arabia. The new genus is monotypical, with &lt;i&gt;Parathrausta&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;i&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;ternervalis&lt;/i&gt; &lt;b&gt;sp.n.&lt;/b&gt; its type species. The adults of the type species, the male genitalia, the female genitalia and the tympanal organs are described and figured. The new genus is recognized as related by characters in the male and female genitalia with genera in the tribes Steniini Guin&amp;#233;e, 1854 and Nomophilini Kuznetzov &amp; Stekolnikov, 1979, namely with &lt;i&gt;Bradina&lt;/i&gt; Lederer, 1863, &lt;i&gt;Perisyntrocha&lt;/i&gt; Meyrick, 1894, &lt;i&gt;Diathrausta&lt;/i&gt; Lederer, 1863, &lt;i&gt;Diasemiopsis&lt;/i&gt; Munroe, 1957, &lt;i&gt;Diasemiodes&lt;/i&gt; Munroe, 1957 and with the genera in the &lt;i&gt;Duponchelia&lt;/i&gt; Zeller, 1847 group comprising &lt;i&gt;Duponchelia&lt;/i&gt; Zeller, 1847, &lt;i&gt;Penestola&lt;/i&gt; M&amp;#246;schler, 1890, &lt;i&gt;Tatobotys&lt;/i&gt; Butler, 1880 and &lt;i&gt;Hymenoptychis&lt;/i&gt; Zeller, 1852. The character states differentiating the new genus from the comparative genera are discussed. Potential autapomorphies of the new genus are listed. The tribal assignment of the new genus to the Nomophilini Kuznetzov &amp; Stekolnikov, 1979 based on morphological characters is discussed. The support of the tribal and cladistic assignment of the new genus as a sister clade to &lt;i&gt;Diathrausta&lt;/i&gt; Lederer, 1863 based phylogenetic analyses (NJ, MP and ML) is shown. An unusually strong genetic divergence of the genus in the COI segment of the mt-DNA based on the Tamura-Nei distance measure from the morphologically related genera is recognized and addressed.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Pyraloidea</kwd><kwd> Taxonomy</kwd><kwd> Morphology</kwd><kwd> COI</kwd><kwd> New Genus</kwd><kwd> New Species</kwd><kwd> Arabian Peninsula</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Abstract</title><p>The new genus Parathrausta gen.n. in the subfamily Spilomelinae (Lepidoptera, Crambidae) is erected based on a series of specimens collected in the Afrotropical region of Saudi Arabia. The new genus is monotypical, with Parathrausta internervalis sp.n. its type species. The adults of the type species, the male genitalia, the female genitalia and the tympanal organs are described and figured. The new genus is recognized as related by characters in the male and female genitalia with genera in the tribes Steniini Guin&#233;e, 1854 and Nomophilini Kuznetzov &amp; Stekolnikov, 1979, namely with Bradina Lederer, 1863, Perisyntrocha Meyrick, 1894, Diathrausta Lederer, 1863, Diasemiopsis Munroe, 1957, Diasemiodes Munroe, 1957 and with the genera in the Duponchelia Zeller, 1847 group comprising Duponchelia Zeller, 1847, Penestola M&#246;schler, 1890, Tatobotys Butler, 1880 and Hymenoptychis Zeller, 1852. The character states differentiating the new genus from the comparative genera are discussed. Potential autapomorphies of the new genus are listed. The tribal assignment of the new genus to the Nomophilini Kuznetzov &amp; Stekolnikov, 1979 based on morphological characters is discussed. The support of the tribal and cladistic assignment of the new genus as a sister clade to Diathrausta Lederer, 1863 based phylogenetic analyses (NJ, MP and ML) is shown. An unusually strong genetic divergence of the genus in the COI segment of the mt-DNA based on the Tamura-Nei distance measure from the morphologically related genera is recognized and addressed.</p><p>Keywords:</p><p>Pyraloidea, Taxonomy, Morphology, COI, New Genus, New Species, Arabian Peninsula</p><disp-formula id="scirp.133764-formula1"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1410169x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s2"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The subfamily Spilomelinae has a worldwide distribution and is known as the most diverse subfamily in the Pyraloidea, currently comprising a total of 4100 valid species, 338 genera and 12 tribes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref2">2</xref>] . Mally et al. presented the first comprehensive revision of the subfamily at tribal level [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref1">1</xref>] . In this study, a synapomorphy has been recognized for the first time for the Spilomelinae based on morphological and phylogenetic data in the tympanal organs, namely the fornix tympani projecting in the ventral direction from the tympanic frame. Further characters recognized for the subfamily include a bilobed praecinctorium, the absence of a gnathos and the presence of ventral processes (fibulae) in the valva, and weak to absent sclerotization in the corpus bursae of the female genitalia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>The subfamily has been extensively studied for the Palearctic, Neotropical and Oriental zones. Recent faunistic and taxonomic revisions have been reported in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref8">8</xref>] . For the Afrotropical zone, however, recent studies have been confined to South Africa, West Africa and the Malagasy Islands [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref9">9</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref14">14</xref>] . The potential for endemic taxa on specific and generic level in the Spilomelinae has to date been little explored. Shaffer &amp; Munroe and Maes presented recent advances [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref15">15</xref>] . In these studies, a total of ten genera known to date as endemic to Africa were described.</p><p>The Afrotropical zone of the Arabian Peninsula, which spans the southwestern province Dhofar of the Sultanate of Oman, Yemen and the south-western Saudi Arabia has been little explored for the Spilomelinae to date. The faunistic records have been based prevalently on historical data. The first comprehensive survey on literature and research status is given in Seizmair [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref16">16</xref>] . Studies by Hacker and Hausmann showed the endemic potential for several superfamilies including the Noctuoidea and Geometroidea of the mountain chains of the southern Arabian Peninsula spanning from the Hedjaz mountains in Saudi Arabia to the Saravat mountain chains along the Red Sea into the south of Yemen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref18">18</xref>] .</p><p>In this study, a new genus Parathrausta gen.n., of the subfamily is erected based on a series of crambid moths which came to the attention of the author when evaluating samples collected in the Fayfa Mountains in southwestern Saudi Arabia. The specimens were found to be related in internal morphology to genera in the tribes Steniini Guin&#233;e, 1854 and Nomophilini Kuznetzov &amp; Stekolnikov, 1979. The tribal assignment to the Nomophilini Kuznetzov &amp; Stekolnikov, 1979 and the cladistic placement of the new genus is discussed on the basis of morphological and molecular genetic data.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>2.1. Sampling</title><p>The specimens (n = 5) presented in this paper belong to a moth sample collected in a research expedition to the Fayfa Mountains in the south-western province Jizan of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in March 2023. The material was captured by night using light traps equipped with UV-Power-LEDs spanning a wavelength spectrum of 365 nm - 385 nm. The trapping technique is described in Brehm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref19">19</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>2.2. Macro-Preparation, Dissection and Digital Image Processing</title><p>The adults were photographed after relaxation and subsequent preparation with a CANON EOS M6 Mark II under an MP-E-65 mm zoom. To examine the genitalia and tympanal organs, dissection and slide-mounting techniques were applied to the specimens according to the protocols described in Robinson and Maes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref21">21</xref>] . The preparation of the tympanal organs and of the genitalia was done under a Motic stereomicroscope (SMZ-171). The slides were photographed with a ToupCam c-mount camera (ToupTek Inc., Zhejiang, China). The images were processed using the imaging software Adobe Photoshop PS, Version 21.0.2.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>2.3. Morphological Analyses and Comparisons</title><p>Analyses of wing pattern characters and morphological structures in the specimens of the sample were done on the images. Structural ratios in external characters, genitalia and tympanal organs were calculated on the images by means of the imaging software ToupView, Version 1.0 (ToupTek Inc., Zhejiang, China).</p><p>The specimens in the sample were compared with genitalia figures of morphologically related taxa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref26">26</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>2.4. Phylogenetic Analysis</title><sec id="s3_4_1"><title>2.4.1. DNA Extraction</title><p>From two specimens of the type series legs were separated for DNA extraction. Genomic DNA (658 base-pairs) was extracted using the GenElute Mammalian Genomic DNA (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The DNA extraction was done by the staff of the Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia. The DNA extracts are deposited in the Zoological collection of this institute. Amplification was done on mitochondrial DNA—the Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) using standard primers (LCO1490 and HCO2198) and PCR amplification protocols. PCR products were purified using Exonuclease I and FastAP (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and sequenced in both directions by Macrogen Europe (Amsterdam, The Netherlands). The resulting chromatograms were assembled and edited using Geneious 8.1.9. (Biomatters, New Zealand), with ambiguous bases coded using IUPAC nucleotide ambiguity characters.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4_2"><title>2.4.2. Data Set Compilation</title><p>The DNA sequences of two type specimens and of taxa morphologically related to the two type specimens from the tribes Steniini Guin&#233;e, 1854 and Nomophilini Kuznetzov &amp; Stekolnikov, 1979 were compiled into a data set in FASTA format. The DNA sequences (n = 19) of the comparative taxa were downloaded from the BOLD database [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref27">27</xref>] . The comparative material is listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>The taxa Prophantis androstigmata (Hampson, 1918) and Trichaea pilicornis (Herrich-Sch&#228;ffer, 1866) were used as outgroups. Both taxa are attributed to the tribe Trichaeini Mally, Hayden, Neinhuis, Jordal &amp; Nuss, 2019. The latter tribe was shown to be closely related to Steniini and Nomophilini [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref1">1</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_4_3"><title>2.4.3. Phylogenetic Tree Inference</title><p>The DNA sequences were aligned using the MUSCLE algorithm. The alignment was subsequently cured of potential alignment errors, strongly divergent and ambiguous regions using the software Gblocks 0.91b [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref28">28</xref>] . These two algorithms were applied using the portal Phylogeny.fr [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref29">29</xref>] .</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Comparative material in the data set used for phylogenetic analysis identified by taxon names, BOLD ID, GenBank Access ID and Sample ID</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Taxon</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BOLD ID</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >GenBank Access ID</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample ID</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Penestola bufalis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BBLOB1224-11.COI5P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BIOUG01416-G12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Penestola bufalis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BBLOB516-11.COI5P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BIOUG01397-D05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Duponchelia fovealis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EHL177-12. COI5P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C090901A1Jan2009</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Duponchelia fovealis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >FBLMU001-09. COI5P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HQ955198</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BC ZSM Lep 25511</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hymenoptychis sordida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ANICN520-10. COI5P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HQ952790</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10ANIC-10516</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tatobotys biannulalis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ANIC517-10.COI5P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HQ952787</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10ANIC-10513</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tatobotys vibrata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PMAML4578-15. COI5P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >USNM ENT 01068264</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diathrausta harlequinalis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LOFLC268-06.COI5P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >06-FLOR-2148</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diathrausta reconditalis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LMIS071-06.COI5P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >05-ONMIS-0071</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diathrausta picata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ANIC575-06. COI5P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ANIC Gen No. 000767</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diathrausta ochreipennis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ANICB104-06. COI5P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ANIC Gen No. 001236</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diasemiopsis ramburialis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ANICB702-07. COI5P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ANIC Gen No. 001670</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diasemiopsis leodocusalis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BLPED803-11.COI5P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11-SRNP-104405</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diasemiodes eudamidasalis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BLPCD772-08.COI5P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >JQ560611</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >07-SRNP-108197</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Perisyntrocha sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >WALPD011-15. COI5P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BIOUG21481-D10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Perisyntrocha sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ANICN219-10. COI5P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HQ9528008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10ANIC-10215</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bradina atopalis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GBMIN18017-13. COI5P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KC135909</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KC135909</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bradina admixtalis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ANICN210-10. COI5P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HQ952604</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10ANIC-10206</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bradina diagonalis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MAMTL561-12. COI5P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KX862027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BIOUG02380-F07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Prophantis androstigmata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ANIC522-06.COI-5P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ANIC Gen No. 000714</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trichaea pilicornis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ASARD847-11.COI-5P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >INB0004208564</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>For inferring a first phylogenetic hypothesis on the cladistic placement of the new genus MP- and ML-trees were computed. An NJ tree was computed to assess the genetic distances between the new genus and the morphologically related genera in the dataset. Furthermore, average genetic distances within and between the genera were computed. These computations were done using the software MEGA, Version 11.0.13 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref30">30</xref>] . For the construction of the MP and NJ trees and of the genetic distance matrices a list of best fitting substitution models was computed based on the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref31">31</xref>] using the same software. The Tamura-Nei model was selected [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref32">32</xref>] . For both approaches the branch supports were assessed by 5000 bootstrap replicates.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>2.5. Terminology and Abbreviations</title><p>The denotations of veins follow the terminology of Shaffer &amp; Munroe [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref14">14</xref>] . The descriptions of wing pattern characters, genitalia and tympanal organs follow the terminology of Maes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref21">21</xref>] . Abbreviations: ML = Maximum Liklihood, MP = Maximum Parsimony, NJ = Neighbour Joining, n = length of a sample. slide no. = slide number, ZSM = Zoological State Collection Munich.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>Parathrausta gen.n.</p><p>Zoobank ID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:F06E2514-930D-4389-AE64-93F4237F5A0A</p><p>Type species: Parathrausta internervalis sp.n.</p><p>External characters (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>): Head: Antenna filiform ciliate, bipectinate. Frons flattened. Labial palpus porrect, slightly slanted and broadly scaled in segments 1 and 2, segment 3 vertically upturned, protruding from segment 2, spatulate. Maxillary palpus upright, filiform, unscaled. The proboscis is well developed. Wing venation: Forewing Sc half as long as the costal border. R1 develops from the posterior fifth of the cell, R2 and R3 + 4, R5 develop from the anterior angle of the cell. R1 and R2 are equal in length, widely spaced, terminating far below the costal border. R2 is free, closely apposed to R3 + 4, running straight to the termen. R3 + 4 is parallelled with R2 up to the posterior fourth of the wing then diverging towards the termen. R5 is basally approximated to R3 + 4, running parallel with the costa. M1 is basally approximated with R5, running quasi straight into the termen. M2, M3 and CuA1 develop from the posterior angle of the cell, basally closely approximated. CuA2 develops from the posterior fourth of the cubitus. The cell is equal in length to one-third of the costa. Retinaculum bristle present, marked as a small pad of long hairs. Hindwing Sc + R1 and Rs long stalked for half of the total wing length. Sc + R1 convex in the anterior fifth. M1 anastomosed with Sc + R1, running straight to the termen. M2, M3 and CuA1 develop from the posterior angle of the cell and are basally closely approximated. CuA2 develops from the middle of the cubitus. Origins of CuP and 1A + 2A closely approximated. 1A + 2A and 3A running parallel into the termen. Number of frenula: four spines.</p><p>Male genitalia (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>): Uncus lobar, apex ovate with bifid chaetae laterally and dorsally, neck relatively short, length relative to the width of the valva 0.4, with oblong chaetae laterally, scaphium absent, transition to the tegumen smooth, from a broad basis to an equally broad tegumen. Tegumen ridges concave, interconnected medially, forming an H-shaped structure. Transtilla of trapezoid shape, basally broadened, medially connected. Juxta digitiform, unsplit, laterally sclerotized. Vinculum broadened, with androconia present. Saccus v-shaped, relatively broad, width relative to length 0.8. Valva double as long as wide, costa straight, sclerotized, bare from inflation, with an elongate anteriad-directed sub-costal process. Apex obliquely rounded towards the costa, with a tuft of short chaetae. Ventral border concave. Basal valva with three fibulae, two of which are short, equal in length, with their length relative to the length of the valva 0.17, laterally fanning out into multi-furcate structures. The third fibula is deciduous, oblong, three times as long as the two short ones, convex at the basis, thus forming a j-shape. A fourth rod-shaped sclerotization is present, however developing wide-spaced from the basis, distally fanning out into a multi-setose structure. Each of the fibulae is longitudinally oriented, running parallel to the ventral border and wide-spaced from the sacculus. Basal sacculus broad, acuminate. Phallus with stroke-shaped sclerites in the medial and posterior areas, vesica bare from cornuti, coecum present, with the anterior end narrowed and rounded at the tip, ductus ejaculatorius inserted laterally at the coecum.</p><p>Female genitalia (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>A, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>B): Papilla analis ovate, strongly chaetose. Anterior apophyses medially dilated, 1.4 times as long as the posterior apophyses. Ostium membranous, bare from sclerotization. Antrum strongly broadened, barrel-shaped, membranous. Colliculum strongly sclerotized, broadened, bare from medial membranous strip. Ductus bursae broadened and strongly sclerotized at the posterior end, transition to the corpus bursae smooth, to a narrowed posterior corpus bursae. Corpus bursae ovate, wall with a transversally oriented, u-shaped, toothed signum, which is constant in width.</p><p>Tympanal organs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>C): Rami tympani medially connected. Bulla tympani closed. Pons tympani with a short, broadened basis, lobes short. Processi tympani present, basally broad, of sub-triangular shape. Fornix tympani narrow. Tergo-sternal sclerite, slender, thorn-shaped, shortened. The lobes of the praecinctorium differ in length and shape. The shorter lobe is sickle-shaped, with a right-angled curvature. The longer lobe is straight, acuminate, and strongly tapered in the anterior half.</p><p>Diagnosis: The new genus is morphologically related in the presence of an arch-shaped, serrate signum in the corpus bursae wall with the genera Bradina Lederer, 1863, Perisyntrocha Meyrick, 1894, Diathrausta Lederer, 1863, Diasemiopsis Munroe, 1957 and Diasemiodes Munroe, 1957. Bradina Lederer, 1893 is attributed to the Steniini, and the other genera are attributed to the Nomophilini [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>The new genus is differentiated from Bradina in the anastomosing of the R2 on the R3 + 4 stem in the forewing. In Bradina the R2 is anastomosed with the R3 + 4, in the new genus the R2 is free, however, closely apposed to R3 + 4 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref33">33</xref>] . The new genus is furthermore differentiated in the male genitalia from each of the comparative genera by the number and directedness of the fibulae.</p><p>In each of the comparative genera, the number of fibulae is ≤1—zero in Diasemiodes Munroe, 1957, one in each of the other comparative genera. The fibula is transversally directed towards the sacculus and develops from below the costa in each of the comparative genera. In the new genus the fibulae are longitudinally directed, running parallel with the sacculus and develop either medially from the basal valva or immediately above the basal sacculus. Furthermore, the vesica is armed with cornuti in each of the comparative genera. In the new genus, the vesica is unarmed. The saccus in the new genus is strongly protuberant, elongate and v-shaped, strongly shortened and u-shaped in the comparative genera Diasemiodes, Diasemiopis, Diathrausta and Perisyntrocha. The costa of the valva is straight in the new genus, convex in the comparative genera.</p><p>The longitudinal directedness of the fibula(e) is also shared with the genus Diasemiodes Munroe, 1957 and with the genera in the Duponchelia Zeller, 1847 group, which comprises Duponchelia Zeller, 1847, Penestola M&#246;schler, 1890, Tatobotys Butler, 1880 and Hymenoptychis Zeller, 1852 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref26">26</xref>] . The Duponchelia group is attributed to the Steniini Guin&#233;e, 1854 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>In the Duponchelia group the forewing R2 is anastomosed on R3 + 4 as in Bradina and the corpus bursae wall is bare from signa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref26">26</xref>] . The presence of a signum in the corpus bursae wall is viewed as exceptional for the Steniini [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref1">1</xref>] . Furthermore, the new genus and Perisyntrocha, Diathrausta, Diasemiodes, Diasemiopsis are distinguished from Bradina in the shape of the signum. In Bradina the signum is medially dilated, in Perisyntrocha, Diathrausta, Diasemiodes, Diasemiopsis and in the new genus, however, the signum is of constant width. With Diathrausta and Diasemiodes the new genus is furthermore related in the lobar shape of the uncus and the strongly sclerotized antrum.</p><p>The new genus is thus placed closest to the genera Perisyntrocha, Diathrausta, Diasemiodes and Diasemiopsis in the Nomophilini. However, the presence of several fibulae and their longitudinal directedness from the medial basis of the valva is exceptional for the Nomophilini [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133764-ref1">1</xref>] . The male genitalia of the known genera of this tribe are characterized by one or zero fibulae in the valva. If present, the fibula develops transversally from below the costa. Further potential apomorphies of the new genus are the H-shaped structure formed by the medially connected tegumen ridges and the presence of multi-furcate fibulae.</p><p>Phylogenetic placement (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>): The new genus Parathrausta gen.n. is strongly supported by an unusually strong genetic divergence from the morphologically related genera in the tribes Steniini and Nomophilini, as shown in the original NJ tree. The new genus is genetically closest to Diathrausta (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). The average genetic distance between the haplotypes of the new genus and those of Diathrausta in the current dataset is 0.65, while the average genetic distances between the new genus and Bradina, Perisyntrocha, the Diasemiodes + Diasemiopsis clade and the Duponchelia group range between 0.68 and 0.73 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) in the present analysis. The average genetic distances within Parathrausta, and Diathrausta are respectively 0.01 and 0.08. The genetic distances within the other groups range between 0.02 and 0.10 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Average genetic distances between the genera/genus groups based on the Tamura-Nei distance model</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Outgroup</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Bradina</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Duponchelia- group</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Diathrausta</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Perisytrocha</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Diasemiodes + Diasemiopsis</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parathrausta</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bradina</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Duponchelia-group</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diathrausta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Perisytrocha</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diasemiodes + Diasemiopsis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parathrausta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Average genetic distances within the genera/genus groups</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >outgroup</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bradina</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Duponchelia group</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diathrausta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Perisytrocha</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diasemiodes + Diasemiopsis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parathrausta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>In the MP-, ML- and NJ-bootstrap consensus trees inferred from the current dataset, the new genus appears as a sister of sub-clades under Diathrausta. The pertaining branch is substantially supported with BS values between 72 and 77. However, a clade formed by the genera related by the presence of an arch-shaped transversal signum cannot be confirmed by any of the analyses in the current dataset. These genera are distributed over several clades according to the present analysis: Weak to moderate branch support is given to Diasemiopsis + Diasemiodes, with BS values between 56 and 65. Bradina + Perisyntrocha is weakly supported, with BS values between 46 and 52.</p><p>Diversity and distribution: The genus is monotypical. The distribution is Afrotropical, at present only known from south-western Saudi Arabia.</p><p>Etymology: The generic name refers to the hypothetical cladistic position derived from the present dataset as sister to Diathrausta. It is composed of the prefix para- (greek: besides, next to) and the suffix -thrausta. The gender of the genus is feminine.</p><p>Parathrausta internervalis sp.n.</p><p>Zoobank ID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:86CFDC11-1351-46A5-A721-E6E4CB74B321</p><p>Material: Holotype: ♀, Saudi Arabia, Prov. Jizan, Fayfa Mts., Al Kasha, 17˚14'30.21&quot;N, 43˚3'40.00&quot;E, 640 m, 22.-23-III.2923, slide no. 23GP042, leg. et prep. M. Seizmair, coll. ZSM. Paratypes: 2♂, 2♀, same collection data as for the holotype, slide no. 23GP032, 23GP043, 23GP053, 23GP054, leg., prep, coll. M. Seizmair.</p><p>External characters (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>A, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>B, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>F): Wingspan: 12.2 mm - 13.2 mm. Length of forewing: 6.2 mm - 7.6 mm. Head: Antenna yellowish in the flagellum, ciliae greyish-white. Frons, vertex and tegula greyish-white. Basal scales of the proboscis yellowish. Labial palpus brownish scaled, sporadically interspersed with greyish scales, length relative to the diameter of the eye 60%. Maxillary palpus equal in length to one-fifth of the diameter of the eye. Thorax: Venter and dorsum grey scaled. Legs greyish-white scaled in the femur, tibia and tarsi yellowish-brown. Length of the inner relative to the outer metathoracic spurs 60%. Forewing double as long as broad, costal and dorsal borders straight. Apex acuminate, upturned. Termen medially concave. Tornus edged. Upper side ground yellowish-brown, bare from lines. Costal border interspersed with darkish brown scales over 3/4 of its length. Discocellular spot darkish-brown, claviform. Termen with darkish-brown interneural spots. Fringe darkish-brown. Underside with darkish-brown postmedial fasciae ranging from R5 to M3. Retinaculum bristle marked as a pad of elongate yellowish-grey hairs. Hindwing 1.2 times as long as broad, costal border straight, apex and tornus rounded. Upper side ground yellowish-grey, with darkish-brown postmedial fasciae ranging from Sc + R1 to M2. Termen with darkish-brown interneural spots ranging from M1 to 1A + 2A. No further maculation is present. The underside is identical to the upper side. Abdomen: elongate, dorsum greyish-white scaled, venter yellowish-grey in the female, dorsum yellowish-brown, venter yellowish-grey in the male.</p><p>Male genitalia: As for the genus.</p><p>Female genitalia: As for the genus.</p><p>Tympanal organs: As for the genus.</p><p>Bionomics: The type specimens were captured on grassy terraces interspersed with shrubs on the verge of a tropical rainforest. The premature stages, larval food plant and habitat choice are unknown at present.</p><p>Distribution: Currently known only from its type locality in south-western Saudi Arabia, near the Yemen border.</p><p>Etymology: The epitheton refers to one of the external character states of the species, namely the interneural spots in the fore- and hindwing termen.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>In this paper a new monotypical genus Parathrausta gen.n. was erected with the type species Parathrausta internervalis sp.n.. The attribution of the material to a new genus in the subfamily Spilomelinae is phylogenetically strongly supported by the unusually great genetic divergence of 0.65 from morphologically related genera in the Duponchelia group, Bradina, Perisyntrocha, Diathrausta, Diasemiodes, Diasemiopsis. The genetic divergence is seen to be in accordance with the morphological differences of the new genus from the comparative genera. These morphological differential characters were shown to be the anastomosing of the forewing R2, the number of fibulae, the shape and directedness of the fibulae, the shape of the saccus and of the costa. The medial connectedness of the tegumen arms and the presence of multi-furcate fibulae are valued as potential autapomorphies of the genus. Furthermore, the results of the present phylogenetic analyses are valued as a first indication of the placement of the new genus in the Nomophilini as a sister to Diathrausta. Morphological characters shared with Diathrausta are the lobar shape of the uncus and the strongly sclerotized antrum. However, a full understanding of the unusual genetic divergence of the haplotypes of the new genus from those of the morphologically related genera is not possible by the currently available data. Sequences of Afrotropical species of Bradina, Diathrausta, and Diasemiopsis are currently unavailable. In particular, the exceptionally strong genetic divergence from Diathrausta may be relativized when data from other parts of the genomes of the new genus and its relatives become known. The sister relation to Diathrausta may be in need of revision when molecular data of Afrotropical species become known.</p><p>Further study is necessary for understanding the relatedness of the new genus and the genera of the Nomophilini related by the transversal, arch-shaped signum. The latter character as a potential homology could not be supported by the presently available molecular genetic data.</p><p>Distribution, abundance, reproduction and ecology of the new genus are unknown at present and are subject to further research.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The author acknowledges Hathal al-Dhafer (King Saud University, Riyad, Saudi Arabia) for cooperation and support of the expeditions, Alrabea Ishag (King Saud University, Riyad, Saudi Arabia) for accompaniment, advice and support on the expeditions to Saudi Arabia, Rudi Verovnik and Behare Rexhepi, (Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia), for receiving the tissue samples of type specimens and for the laboratory work.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Seizmair, M. (2024) Contribution to the Knowledge of the Afrotropical Spilomelinae (Lepidoptera, Crambidae): A New Genus in the Tribe Nomophilini Kuznetzov &amp; Stekolnikov 1979 Based on Morphology and DNA Barcoding. Advances in Entomology, 12, 155-169. https://doi.org/10.4236/ae.2024.123012</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.133764-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mally, R., Hayden, J., Neinhuis, C., Jordal, B.H. and Nuss, M. (2019) The Phylogeneticsystematics of Spilomelinae and Pyraustina (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea: Crambidae) Inferred from DNA and Morphology. &lt;i&gt;Arthropod&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Systematics&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;&amp;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Phylogeny&lt;/i&gt;, 77, 141-204. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nuss, M., Landry, B., Mally, R., Vegliante, F., Tr&amp;#228;nkner, A., Bauer, F., Hayden, J., Segerer, A., Schouten, R., Li, H., Trofimova, T., Solis, M.A., De Prins, J. and Speidel, W. (2024) Global Information System on Pyraloidea. &lt;br&gt;http://www.pyraloidea.org/index.php?id=10 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Solis, M.A. and Maes, K.V.N. (2003) Preliminary Phylogenetic Analysis of the Subfamilies of Crambidae (Pyraloidea: Lepidoptera). &lt;i&gt;Belgian&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Journal&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;of&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Entomology&lt;/i&gt;, 4, 53-95.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Regier, J.C., Mitter, C.E., Solis, M.A., Hayden, J.E., Landry, B., Nuss, M., Simonsen, T.J., Yen, S.-H., Zwick, A. and Cummings, M.P. (2012) A Molecular Phylogeny for the Pyraloid Moths (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea) and Its Implications for Higher-Level Classification. &lt;i&gt;Systematic&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Entomology&lt;/i&gt;, 37, 635-656. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2012.00641.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Slamka, F. (2013) Pyraloidea of Europe, Pyraustinae &amp; Spilomelinae, Identification-Distribution-Habitat-Biology. Volume 3, Frantisek Slamka, Bratislava. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alipanah, H. and Slamka, F. (2023) A Revision of the Subfamily Spilomelinae (Lepidoptera, Crambidae) in Iran with Description of a New Species. &lt;i&gt;Zootaxa&lt;/i&gt;, 5258, 1-70. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5248.1.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pasam, M.R., Muddappa, S.M. and Aralimarad, P. (2023) Taxonomy of Agriculturally Important Spilomelinae (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea: Crambidae) of Karnataka, India. &lt;i&gt;Oriental&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Insects&lt;/i&gt;, 57, 839-897. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/00305316.2022.2162142</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Landry</surname><given-names> B. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2016</year>)<article-title>Taxonomic Revision of the Spilomelinae (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae s. l.) of the Gal&amp;#225;pagos Islands, Ecuador</article-title><source> &lt;i&gt;Revue&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Suisse&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;de&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Zoologie&lt;/i&gt;</source><volume> 123</volume>,<fpage> 315</fpage>-<lpage>399</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kr&amp;#252;ger, M. (2020) Checklist of the Lepidoptera of Southern Africa. &lt;i&gt;Metamorphosis&lt;/i&gt;, 30, 1-201. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/met.v31i2.2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Poltavsky, A.N., Kravchenko, V.D., Traore, M.M., Traore, S.F., Gergely, P., Witt, T.J., Sulak, H., Beck, R.H.T., Junnila, A., Revay, E.E., Doumbia, S., Beier, J.C. and M&amp;#252;ller, G.C. (2018) The Pyraloidea (Lepidoptera) Fauna of the Woody Savannah Belt in Mali, West Africa. &lt;i&gt;Zootaxa&lt;/i&gt;, 4457, 39-69. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4457.1.2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Poltavsky, A.N., Safian, S., Simonics, G., Kravchenko, V.D. and M&amp;#252;ller, G.C. (2019) The Pyraloidea (Lepidoptera) Fauna in the Liberian Nimba Mountains, West Africa, at the End of the Dry Season. &lt;i&gt;Israel&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Journal&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;of&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Entomology&lt;/i&gt;, 49, 11-40.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Viette, P. (1990) Faune de Madagascar. Suppl&amp;#233;ment 1. Liste recapitulative des L&amp;#233;pidopt&amp;#233;res H&amp;#233;t&amp;#233;roc&amp;#233;res de Madagascar. Privately Published by the Author.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">De Prins, J. and De Prins, W. (2024) Afromoth Online Database of Afrotropical Moth Species (Lepidoptera). &lt;br&gt;https://www.afromoths.net/ </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shaffer, J.C. and Munroe, E.G. (2007) Crambidae of Aldabra Atoll (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea). &lt;i&gt;Tropical&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Lepidoptera&lt;/i&gt;, 14, 1-114.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maes, K.V.N. (2022) Studies on African Crambidae I&amp;#8212;A New Genus and Species from Africa (Pyraloidea: Crambidae: Spilomelinae). &lt;i&gt;Metamorphosis&lt;/i&gt;, 33, 64-67. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/met.v33i1.7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Seizmair, M. (2022) Faunistic and Taxonomic Notes on Eleven Recently Recorded Species of Spilomelinae Guin&amp;#233;e, 1854 (Lepidoptera, Crambidae) from the Arabian Peninsula with an Updated Checklist. &lt;i&gt;Zoological&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Entomological&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Letters&lt;/i&gt;, 22, 21-30. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.22271/letters.2022.v2.i2a.43</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hacker, H.H. (2016) Systematic and Illustrated Catalogue of the Macroheterocera and Cossidoidea, Zygaenoidea, Thridoidea and Hyblaeoidea of the Arabian Peninsula, with a Survey of Their Distribution. Lepidoptera, Esperiana, 20, 1-742.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hausmann</surname><given-names> A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2006</year>)<article-title>The Geometrid Moth Species from Yemen&amp;#8212;With 50 New Records for the Country and Description of 20 New Taxa</article-title><source> &lt;i&gt;Esperiana&lt;/i&gt;</source><volume> 12</volume>,<fpage> 9</fpage>-<lpage>62</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brehm, G. (2017) A New LED Lamp for the Collection of Nocturnal Lepidoptera and a Spectral Comparison of Light-Trapping Lamps. &lt;i&gt;Nota&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Lepidopterologica&lt;/i&gt;, 40, 87-108. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3897/nl.40.11887</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Robinson</surname><given-names> G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1976</year>)<article-title>The Preparation of Slides of Lepidoptera Genitalia with Special Reference to the Microlepidoptera</article-title><source> &lt;i&gt;Entomologist&amp;#8217;s&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Gazette&lt;/i&gt;</source><volume> 27</volume>,<fpage> 127</fpage>-<lpage>132</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Maes</surname><given-names> K.V.N. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1995</year>)<article-title>A Comparative Morphological Study of the Adult CRAMBIDAE (Lepidoptera, Pyraloidea)</article-title><source> &lt;i&gt;Proceedings&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Annals&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;of&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;the&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Belgian&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Entomological&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Royal&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Society&lt;/i&gt;</source><volume> 131</volume>,<fpage> 383</fpage>-<lpage>434</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maes, K.V.N. (2006) A New Species of Diathrausta Lederer, 1863 from Africa (Lepidoptera, Pyraloidea, Crambidae, Spilomelinae). &lt;i&gt;Revue&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Suisse&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;de&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Zoologie&lt;/i&gt;, 113, 287-290. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.80351</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maes, K.V.N. (2019) Description of Four New Species of Crambidae from the Afrotropical Region (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea: Crambidae). &lt;i&gt;Metamorphosis&lt;/i&gt;, 30, 46-50. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/met.v30i1.9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Munroe, E.G. (1956) The North American Species of &lt;i&gt;Diathrausta&lt;/i&gt; Lederer (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae). &lt;i&gt;The&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Canadian&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Entomologist&lt;/i&gt;, 88, 579-583. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent88579-10</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Munroe, E.G. (1957) North American Components of the Genus Diasemia of Authors (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). &lt;i&gt;The&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Canadian&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Entomologist&lt;/i&gt;, 89, 164-170. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent89164-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hayden J.E. (2011) Systematics of the European Pepper Moth, Duponchelia Zeller (Lepidoptera: Crambidae: Spilomelinae). &lt;br&gt;https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267527311_Systematics_of_the_European_pepper_moth_Duponchelia_Zeller_Lepidoptera_Crambidae_Spilomelinae </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">BOLD (2024) Barcoding Life. &lt;br&gt;https://www.boldsystems.org/ </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Talavera, G. and Castresana, J. (2007) Improvement of Phylogenies after Removing Divergent and Ambiguously Aligned Blocks from Protein Sequence Alignments. &lt;i&gt;Systematic&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Biology&lt;/i&gt;, 56, 564-577. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150701472164</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dereeper, A., Guignon, V., Blanc, G., Audic, S., Buffet, S., Chevenet, F., Dufayard, J.F., Guindon, S., Lefort, V., Lescot, M., Claverie, J.M. and Gascuel, O. (2008) Phylogeny.fr: Robust Phylogenetic Analysis for the Non-Specialist. &lt;i&gt;Nucleic&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Acids&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;R&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;e&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;search&lt;/i&gt;, 36, W465-W469. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn180</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tamura, K., Stecher, G. and Kumar, S. (2021) MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. &lt;i&gt;Molecular&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Biology&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Evolution&lt;/i&gt;, 38, 3022-3027. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab120</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schwarz, G. (1978) Estimating the Dimension of a Model. &lt;i&gt;Annals&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;of&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Statistics&lt;/i&gt;, 6, 461-464. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tamura, K. and Nei, M. (1993) Estimation of the Number of Nucleotide Substitutions in the Control Region of Mitochondrial DNA in Humans and Chimpanzees. &lt;i&gt;Molecular&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Biology&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Evolution&lt;/i&gt;, 10, 512-526.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133764-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khan, Z.H. (2000) Biosystematic Studies on Pyralid Pests of Rice Crop in India (Pyralidae: Lepidoptera). PhD Thesis, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>