<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1111579</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-133653</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Physico-Chemical Analysis of Slaughterhouse Wastewater to Develop Appropriate Treatment: The Case of Souk el Arbaa. Morocco
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdelouahed</surname><given-names>Kbibch</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Khalid</surname><given-names>El Khokh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Khadija</surname><given-names>El Kharrim</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Driss</surname><given-names>Belghyti</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Laboratory of Natural Resources and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Sciences, Ibn Tofail University, Kenitra, Morocco</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>05</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>13</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>15,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2024</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This study aimed to characterize and estimate the pollution potential of wastewater discharged into the Mda River, due to effluents from the city&amp;#8217;s municipal slaughterhouse, with the goal of formulating recommendations for appropriate treatment to reduce the serious impact on not only public health and the environment, but also on the city&amp;#8217;s socio-economic activities. A systematic inventory was conducted over the period from January to December 2018. Furthermore, physico-chemical analyses show that the slaughterhouse&amp;#8217;s wastewater reveals a significant pollutant load in terms of organic matter, with COD (average = 280 mg/L), BOD5 (average = 186 mg/L), TSS (average = 300 mg/L), and mineral matter expressed as Chlorides (average = 350.5 mg/L), Electrical Conductivity (average = 2690 &amp;#956;s/cm), with a pH of 7.57. The average concentration of ammonium ions is around 11.4 mg/L, while that of Nitrates is approximately 1.74 mg/L. Despite the high organic load of this wastewater (BOD5/COD ratio = 0.66 and TSS/BOD5 = 1.66), it shows satisfactory biodegradability. The examination of the COD/BOD5 ratio = 1.50 highlights the biodegradable nature of the wastewater from the city&amp;#8217;s municipal slaughterhouse, for which treatment appears to be entirely appropriate.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Wastewater</kwd><kwd> Physico-Chemistry</kwd><kwd> Pollution</kwd><kwd> River Mda</kwd><kwd> Morocco</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The town of Souk el Arbaa, like other Moroccan towns, is faced with environmental degradation caused by a set of factors, particularly the collection and disposal of raw sewage. This phenomenon has been more pronounced in recent years due to an economic and social transition with additional pressures caused by demographic growth, climate change, and urbanization. Slaughterhouses, as a small industry, use a remarkable volume of water for washing, eliminating fecal waste, stomach contents, and blood. These processes require an evacuation system separating solid waste and fats, as well as a specific treatment. Various studies have been conducted to investigate and treat this type of wastewater using treatment plants, either through aerobic methods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref1">1</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref2">2</xref>] or by using anaerobic techniques [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref3">3</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref4">4</xref>] . There are also other treatment methods for purifying slaughterhouse wastewater, such as sand filtration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref5">5</xref>] and electrocoagulation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref6">6</xref>] . It should be pointed out that many Moroccan cities have collected data on the quality of wastewater from slaughterhouses; however, there is limited data on the characterization and treatment of wastewater from the Souk el Arbaa slaughterhouse. Given its proximity, the Mda River remains the only wastewater collection point in the city, which constitutes a concerning source of pollution. The main objective of the study in the city is to define the characteristics of the slaughterhouse’s wastewater discharge by carrying out a physico-chemical analysis identifying certain key and global parameters of wastewater pollution. Finally, it aims to identify measures to protect the receiving environment, as it is an essential source of water for livestock and the irrigation of the agriculture of people living nearby, and by suggesting a means of adequate treatment of this waste.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area</title><p>The city of Souk el Arbaa is located on the northern edge of the Gharb plain, 120 km from the Moroccan capital. It is equipped with a unitary sewage system adapted to the topography, discharging more than 80% of its wastewater into the Mda River [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref2">2</xref>] . The average temperature ranges between 13˚C in December and 26˚C in August. While the average annual rainfall is 700 mm, the dry period is relatively long; stretching from June to September; during this period, the monthly rainfall barely exceeds 9 mm (See <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Experimental Protocol</title><sec id="s2_2_1"><title>2.2.1. Physicochemical Analyses</title><p>Wastewater sampling was conducted a monthly basis, from January 2018 to December 2018, at the slaughterhouse discharge point. Samples were stored in accordance with the general guide for the storage and handling of samples [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref7">7</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_2"><title>2.2.2. Parameters &amp; Methods Analyses (See <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>)</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> below represents the physicochemical parameters studied in our research, the analysis methods used, and their sources.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> The studied parameters and the analysis methods</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Methods analyses</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Untie</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sources</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Temp&#233;rature</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH meter brand PHB-1 cell</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water Analysis, Rodier, 2005 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref7">7</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH meter brand PHB-1 cell</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water Analysis, Rodier, 2005 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref7">7</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Electrical Conductivity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Conductimeter type (WTW LF330/Tetra Con&#174; 325, and type J DDS-308A)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >s/cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water Analysis, Rodier, 2005 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref7">7</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dissolved Oxygen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH meter brand PHB-1 cell</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water Analysis, Rodier, 2005 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref7">7</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Suspended Solids (TSS)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Filtration on a paper filter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Norme EN 872:1996 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref8">8</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chlorides and alkalinity expressed in CaCO<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chlorides and alkalinity expressed as CaCO<sub>3</sub> are determined by the pre-dosed tablet counting method</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Norme NFT 90-10 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref8">8</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BOD5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Determined with a BOD OxiTop meter following incubation at 20˚C for 5 days.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >According to the technique described by DIN [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref9">9</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >COD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Method by oxidation with KMnO<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DIN 38409-H52. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref10">10</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nitrates</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >method.-photometric with 2.6 - dim&#233;thylph&#233;nol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >According to the technique DIN [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref11">11</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nitrite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >photometric</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >According to the technique according to DIN [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref12">12</xref>]</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results &amp; Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Physico-Chemical Parameters of Mixed Slaughterhouse Wastewater</title><p>The pollution of raw wastewater is assessed based on the determination of several physico-chemical parameters that characterize it, and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> groups together the physico-chemical characteristics of the slaughterhouse wastewater.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Physicochemical parameters of wastewater from the souk el Arbaa slaughterhouse</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Min value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Max value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ecart-type</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of samples</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Temperature</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DO (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.353</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CE (&#181;s/cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2670</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2710</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2690</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chlorides (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >298</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >403</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >350.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >215.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alkalinity (mg/L de CaCO<sub>3</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >195</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >157.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BOD (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >162</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >210</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >186</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >COD (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >230</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >330</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >280</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TSS (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >220</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >380</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NH 4 + (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nitrates (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.215</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nitrites (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.212</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Discussion</title><sec id="s3_2_1"><title>3.2.1. Potential of Hydrogen &amp; Temperature</title><p>The wastewater samples from the slaughterhouse show a relatively neutral pH, with optimum values between 7.2 and 7.94. When the pH is below 5 or above 8.5 the growth of micro-organisms is directly affected. As a result, the pH is an important factor in interpreting corrosion in the piping of purification facilities. The temperature ranges between 16.8˚C and 29˚C, with an average of 22.9˚C.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_2"><title>3.2.2. Electrical Conductivity</title><p>It reflects the overall degree of mineralization, informing us about the salinity level. This is a numerical expression of the water’s capacity to conduct an electrical current, measured in millisiemens per centimeter. These findings imply that the waters from the studied slaughterhouse significantly contribute to high levels of conductivity in the water during both wet periods and dry seasons. The values range from 2670 &#181;s/cm to 2710 &#181;s/cm, with an average of 2690 &#181;s/cm. Significantly, the recorded EC (Electrical Conductivity) concentrations have values exceeding the World Health Organization (WHO) standard, which is 500 μS/cm.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_3"><title>3.2.3. Chlorides</title><p>Chloride levels are crucial indicators of water quality, reflecting potential contamination and salinity. The consequences of chloride levels in water are significant. High chloride concentrations can have a negative impact on human health and have ecological consequences, affecting those dependent on water resources. They also pose a potential threat to aquatic ecosystems by disrupting the salinity balance, which can harm aquatic organisms, their habitats, and the overall health of ecosystems (Madhav, et al., 2020) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref13">13</xref>] . The average levels recorded the slaughterhouse wastewater are 350.5 mg/L, with extreme values (from 298 mg/L as the minimum value to 403 mg/L as the maximum value). These concentrations are higher than those of the Kenitra slaughterhouse (Belghyti et al., 2009) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref14">14</xref>] , and exceed the World Health Organization (WHO) discharges standard of 250 mg/L. The wastewater is moderately saline with a predominance of sodium chloride, given that there are salt deposits upstream of the discharges. Additionally, the high chloride concentration results from the fact that drinking water is too concentrated in chloride (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_4"><title>3.2.4. Total Nitrogen</title><p>Nitrates, like other nitrogen forms, rapidly evolve in the natural environment according to the nitrogen cycle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref15">15</xref>] . The presence of nitrogen in wastewater can be either organic or mineral. Organic nitrogen is characterized as a constituent of proteins, polypeptides, amino acids, and urea. Mineral nitrogen, which includes ammonium ( NH 4 + ), nitrites ( NO 2 − ), and nitrates ( NO 3 − ), make up the majority of total nitrogen. The nitrate values recorded in the wastewater discharges vary considerably over the study period. Thus, the nitrate level in the effluents of the municipal slaughterhouse range between 0.88 mg/L and 1.55 mg/L, with an average concentration of 1.21 mg/L, and they are slightly lower than those recorded in the effluents of the Kenitra slaughterhouse. Comparing the average nitrate concentrations in the analyzed wastewater with the quality standard for irrigation water shows that these concentrations are below 50 mg/L, which suggests that these effluents are acceptable for irrigating crops [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref16">16</xref>] . Whereas the ammonium ion ( NH 4 + ) concentration values range between 8.55 mg/L and 14.25 mg/L, with an average of around 11.5 mg/L (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). These remain slightly lower than those recorded in the wastewater of the Eljadida slaughterhouse and those recorded in the wastewater from the Kenitra slaughterhouse [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref17">17</xref>] . The AMMONIUM form is not toxic. However, in water with a pH higher than 7.5 a fraction can be transformed into AMMONIA (ammonia gas suspended in water), which is toxic for fish and organisms living in water, even at low concentrations, (The rise in temperature and pH amplifies the phenomenon).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_5"><title>3.2.5. Alkalinity</title><p>The variations in wastewater alkalinity are closely related to those of the degree of mineralization (electrical conductivity, total hardness, pH), which also provides an indication of the degree of oxidation of organic compounds (in the case of wastewater). The concentration of carbonates ( CO 3 2 − ) and bicarbonates ( HCO 3 − ) in water depends on the CO<sub>2</sub> content as the latter is highly soluble in water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref16">16</xref>] (207 times more than oxygen), and its solubility depends on temperature and atmospheric pressure. The CaCO<sub>3</sub> content is slightly high in the analyzed samples, which could be attributed to the wastewater discharges that are less loaded with fermentable organic materials likely be oxidized, resulting in high CO<sub>2</sub> production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref17">17</xref>] . CaCO<sub>3</sub> is slightly soluble in water; however, the presence of CO<sub>2</sub> gives water a much greater dissolving power by transforming calcium carbonate into calcium bicarbonate, which is more soluble in water according to the following reaction:</p><p>CaCO 3 + CO 2 → Ca ( HCO 3 ) 2 → Ca 2 + + 2 HCO 3 −</p><p>For comparison, Mass&#233; and Masse [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref18">18</xref>] , reported average values between (83 and 900 mg/L) in CaCO<sub>3</sub>, and very high values between 667 and 1056 mg/L for slaughterhouse effluents in Canada, in two separate studies.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_6"><title>3.2.6. Organic Matter &amp; Suspended Solids</title><p>To indirectly assess the total organic load present in wastewater, the following main quality parameters are used: the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) is defined by the amount of oxygen consumed by micro-organisms to ensure the biological degradation of organic matter. This measure provides an approximation of the biodegradable organic matter load in an urban discharge, and the chemical oxygen demand (COD), which represents the quantity of oxygen consumed, in mg/L, by chemically oxidizable materials present in effluent. Mineral and organic particles present in the receiver are suspended solids.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_7"><title>3.2.7. Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)</title><p>In this way, the concentration of BOD levels recorded fluctuate between 162 mg/L (minimum value) and 210 mg/L (maximum value), with an average value of 186 mg/L (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). By examining the surface water quality grid, it can be seen that the quality of wastewater from the Souk el Arbaa city slaughterhouse is extremely poor, exceeding 25 mg/L. The high values of BOD could be explained by the abundance of organic matter (stomach debris) and by the concentration of this effluent by the blood from the municipal slaughterhouse discharges.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_8"><title>3.2.8. Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)</title><p>Throughout the study period, it was observed that COD values show a non-negligible variation. Indeed, the pollutant load of slaughterhouse wastewater, as measured by its COD, remains one of the most important criteria used in designing wastewater treatment to determine the degree of treatment required. Moreover, the recorded values are 230 mg/L as the minimum value and 330 mg/L as the maximum value, with an average of about 280 mg/L, which are slightly higher than the values found in the wastewater of the Kenitra slaughterhouse. The COD values are lower than those of urban waters in Morocco (500 - 1500 mg/L) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref18">18</xref>] . These average values are below 500 mg/L, considered as the direct discharge limit value. Furthermore, these wastewaters are classified as very poor according to the surface water quality standards [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref19">19</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_9"><title>3.2.9. Total Suspended Solids (TSS)</title><p>Turbidity serves as an indicator of water clarity, reflecting the presence of suspended particles (TSS), which contribute to the water’s composition through their ion exchange effects or absorption on both trace chemical elements and microorganisms. The turbidity levels in this study were lower than what was recorded by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref14">14</xref>] (Belghyti et al., 2009), who analyzed water samples from the Sebou River, where slaughterhouse effluents were discharged. High levels of turbidity can hinder photosynthesis by preventing sunlight penetration into the river, which in turn would lead to a decrease in dissolved oxygen production and a reduction in plant survival. According to the results, it is noted that the wastewater from the slaughterhouse carries the same loads as Moroccan urban wastewaters, which TSS concentrations of range between 250 and 700 mg/L [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref20">20</xref>] . Moreover, these average TSS values in the analyzed wastewater are higher than the value set by Moroccan standards [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref16">16</xref>] (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The found values are lower than those recorded in Kenitra and Eljadida. The degradation reactions―aerobic―of organic matter and more broadly, the biological balance of aquatic environments are influenced by the presence of dissolved oxygen. In wastewater treatment systems, its total disappearance is often accompanied by the emergence of H2S in the air, resulting from the reduction of sulfur compounds present in the effluents, and resulting from the acidic attack on the concrete of the pipes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref18">18</xref>] . Based on the recorded values of dissolved oxygen in the wastewater, it can be concluded that these waters are classified from medium quality to very poor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref21">21</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Evaluation of Organic Pollution in Wastewater</title><p>To better understand the origin of the wastewater from the studied effluents of</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Limit values for different discharges, whether direct (Stormwater), Indirect (Wastewater), or water intended for crop irrigation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >VLR direct rejetion</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >VLR indirect rejetion</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Water intended for irrigation</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Temperature</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35˚C</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5 - 8.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5 - 8.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5 - 8.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BOD<sub> </sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100 mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >500 mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >COD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >500 mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000 mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TSS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >600 mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2000 mg/L</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C.E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2780 &#181;S/cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7 &#181;S/cm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Azote Kjeldahl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 Mgh/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >total Phosphore</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 mgP/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Chlorides (Cl)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Chlore actif Cl<sub>2</sub> (0.2 mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >--</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Surface irrigation (350 mg/L)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sprinkler irrigation (105 mg/L)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>the slaughterhouse, it is essential to calculate the COD/BOD5, BOD5/COD, TSS/BOD5 ratios, and to evaluate the Oxidizable Matter (OM) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><sec id="s3_3_1"><title>3.3.1. BOD5/COD Ratio</title><p>The BOD5/COD ratio is often considered to define industrial pollution because it provides very interesting information about the origin of wastewater pollution and the available treatment options. For our research, this ratio presents a high value of approximately 0.664 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). This generally applies to discharges loaded with organic matter. These wastewaters are quite unstable due to their organic load, meaning they will quickly transform into “digested” forms with odors emitting risk. Indeed, the waters contain mainly organic substances, since it only drains wastewater from the slaughterhouse.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_2"><title>3.3.2. COD/BOD5 Ratio</title><p>The COD/BOD5 ratio provides an indication of the origin of organic pollution and also allows estimating the biodegradability of an effluent by indicating the characteristics of these wastewaters. If the COD/BOD5 ratio is less than 3, the waters are of a domestic nature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref18">18</xref>] . The wastewater from the municipal slaughterhouse presents a COD/BOD5 ratio ranging from 1.419 mg/L to 1.571 mg/L (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>), which is consistent with that of urban wastewaters with a domestic predominance. However, since the COD/BOD5 ratio is less than 3, it can be concluded that even though the wastewater from this discharge presents a high organic load, it is easily biodegradable.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_3"><title>3.3.3. TSS/BOD5 Ratio &amp; Oxidizable Matter (OM)</title><p>The degradation of oxidizable matter by absorbing oxygen does not impact environments, but it can lead to hypoxia or even anoxia of the waters when excessive. The waters are then described as “eutrophied”. It is difficult to directly measure the organic compounds present in water. Therefore, the amount of oxygen required for their degradation is assessed in the laboratory, using either biochemical or strictly chemical methods, in accordance with standardized instructions. According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, a high BOD5/COD ratio (0.66) is observed for the wastewater of the municipal slaughterhouse, confirming that the wastewater discharged by this outlet contains a high concentration of organic matter. An average TSS/BOD5 ratio of 1.61 confirms the estimation of oxidizable Matter,</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Ratios of slaughterhouse wastewater</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Min</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Max</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Avg</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Standard deviation</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BOD5/COD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.704</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.636</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.664</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.038</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >COD/BOD5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.419</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.571</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.505</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.107</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TSS/BOD5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.358</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.809</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.612</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.318</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oxidizable materials (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >184.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >217.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.24</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>which is estimated at about 228.34 mg/L. Furthermore, the ratio between COD and BOD5 is low (1.505), leading to the conclusion that the quantity of organic matter present in the wastewater from this discharge is readily biodegradable, as highlighted by Henze et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref22">22</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_4"><title>3.3.4. Pearson Correlation Matrix for Water Quality Parameters</title><p>The Pearson correlation results for the physic-chemical parameters over d the study period are depicted in the correlation matrix in (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>) below. The correlation matrix reveals significant relationships between various water quality parameters. Significantly, temperature exhibits a strong negative correlation with dissolved oxygen (−0.694), suggesting that as temperature increases, dissolved oxygen tends to decrease. This inverse relationship is indicative of potential contamination, affecting the water’s acidity. Moreover, dissolved oxygen (DO) shows a strong positive correlation with Nitrites (0.606), implying that higher Nitrites are associated with increased DO levels, and a strong positive correlation between temperature and electrical conductivity (0.811). However, certain correlations, such as those between Nitrates and NH 4 + (−0.484), indicate complex interactions within the aquatic system.</p><p>According to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, there is a 1.0 correlation between BOD5 and COD, suggesting a perfect positive correlation. This indicates that, in this specific dataset, BOD5 and COD vary in the same manner.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_5"><title>3.3.5. Calculation of Flows and Pollutant Loads</title><p>By the year 2030, the allocation for the city of Souk el Arbaa is 76 L/capita/day. Thus, the volume discharged by the inhabitants is estimated to be 80% of the potable water supply (PWS) allocation.</p><p>According to data from <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>, the wastewater from the collectors of the city of Souk el Arbaa and that of the slaughterhouse produce a pollutant load in BOD5 of approximately 887.74 Kg/day, while that in TSS is about 1431.84 Kg/day</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Pearson correlation coefficients for physicochemical parameters in water samples</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T˚C</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >pH</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CE</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TSS</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >DO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BOD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Chlorides</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NH 4 +</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NO 2 −</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NO 3 −</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.339</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.811</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.117</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TSS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.096</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.057</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.264</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.694</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.288</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.531</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BOD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.264</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.084</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.081</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.551</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.674</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chlorides</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.399</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.145</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.481</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.431</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.665</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.812</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NH 4 +</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.470</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.293</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.373</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.066</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.741</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.557</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.469</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO 2 −</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.262</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.139</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.030</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.458</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.521</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.683</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.584</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.316</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO 3 −</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.410</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.263</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.113</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.246</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.606</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.618</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.463</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.484</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.875</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Flow and pollutant load of the city and the municipal slaughterhouse</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Data</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Unit</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Values</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Daily flow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >m<sup>3</sup>/j</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4772.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average hourly flow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >m<sup>3</sup>/h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >198.86</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Peak flow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >m<sup>3</sup>/h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >332.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diurnal flow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >m<sup>3</sup>/h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >298.26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BOD5 load</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kg/j</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >887.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TSS load</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kg/j</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1431.84</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>(<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). The daily flow amounts to approximately 4772.28 m<sup>3</sup>/day, with an average hourly rate of 198.86 m<sup>3</sup>/h, and a peak flow of 332.06 m<sup>3</sup>/h. The diurnal flow, which corresponds to the 16 consecutive daylight hours during which the station can receive the largest volume of wastewater, is around 298.26 m<sup>3</sup>/h. The values indicated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> are similar to those of cities in its category (with a population between 20,000 and 100,000 inhabitants) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133653-ref23">23</xref>] . This will aid in the future design of a wastewater treatment plant in the city of Souk el Arbaa. Once the degree of organic pollution has been assessed, it can be noted that all the studied parameters (notably BOD5, COD, and TSS) classify the wastewater from the city and the slaughterhouse in the category of medium to high concentrations.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>Based on the analysis of the results, it appears that the pollution criteria for the city’s wastewater, especially with regard to BOD5, COD, and TSS, classify the analyzed wastewater in the medium to high concentration category. This wastewater presents an organic load that is 5 to 7 times higher. In addition to the presence of organic matter, it contains the necessary amounts of organic nitrogen to meet the needs of the purifying microorganisms in biological systems. However, low concentrations of orthophosphates may pose a problem for biological treatment.</p><p>It can be deduced that the wastewater coming from these discharges is easily biodegradable, even if the rates of BOD5/COD and TSS/BOD5 are increasing. According to the analysis of the COD/BOD5 ratio, it is clear that the slaughterhouse’s wastewater is biodegradable, suggesting that a biological treatment is entirely appropriate. According to the Ministry of the Environment, it is essential to treat this wastewater to obtain an effluent that meets the standards for direct and indirect discharges. The slaughterhouse produces wastewater that is suitable for biological treatment concerning BOD5, TSS, and nutrients (nitrates, nitrites, and orthophosphates). The raw wastewater from the city’s municipal slaughterhouse has to be treated, as it contains physicochemical pollution parameters that significantly exceed the general limits for direct and indirect discharges into the receiving environment. This water leads to the contamination of the receiving watercourses, consequently causing enormous nuisances for the residents, neighboring users, and faunal resources.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Kbibch, A., El Khokh, K., El Kharrim, K. and Belghyti, D. (2024) Physico-Chemical Analysis of Slaughterhouse Wastewater to Develop Appropriate Treatment: The Case of Souk el Arbaa. Morocco. Open Access Library Journal, 11: e11579. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1111579</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.133653-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lovett, D.A., Travers, S.M. and Davey, K.R. (1984) Activated Sludge Treatment of Abattoir Wastewater&amp;#8212;I. Influence of Sludge Age and Feeding Pattern. &lt;i&gt;Water Researc&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;h&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;,&lt;/i&gt; 18, 429-434. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(84)90150-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133653-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Couillard, D. and Gariepy, S. (1990) Faisabilit&amp;#233; du proc&amp;#233;d&amp;#233; a&amp;#233;robie thermophile pour un effluent d&amp;#8217;abattoir. &lt;i&gt;The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;,&lt;/i&gt; 68, 1018-1023. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450680618</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133653-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Borja, R. and Duran, M.M. (1993) Influence of the Support on the Kinetics of Anaerobic Purification of Slaughterhouse Wastewater. &lt;i&gt;Bioresource Technology&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;,&lt;/i&gt; 44, 57-60. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8524(93)90208-S</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133653-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reginatto, V., Teixeira, R.M., Pereira, F., Schmidell, W., Furigo, A., Menes, R., Etchebechere, C. and Soqres, H.M. (2003) Anaerobic Ammonium Oxidation in a Bioreactor Treating Slaughterhouse Wastewater. &lt;i&gt;Brazilian Journal of Chemical Eng&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;i&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;neering&lt;/i&gt;, 22, 593-600. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-66322005000400012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133653-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Brissaud</surname><given-names> G.F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2002</year>)<article-title>Etude des limites de l&amp;#8217;&amp;#233;puration par infiltration sur sabledes eaux us&amp;#233;es fortement charg&amp;#233;es en mati&amp;#232;res oxydables de l&amp;#8217;abattoir de Ougadougou au Burkina Faso</article-title><source> &lt;i&gt;Sud Sciences &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;&amp; Technologies&lt;/i&gt;</source><volume> 9</volume>,<fpage> 34</fpage>-<lpage>41</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133653-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asselin, M., Blais, J.-F., Drogui, P. and Benmoussa, H. (2005) Utilisation de l&amp;#8217;&amp;#233;lectrocoagulation pour le traitement des eaux us&amp;#233;es d&amp;#8217;abattoir. 21&lt;i&gt;st Congress Eastern Canada Regional of the Canadian Water Quality Association&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;,&lt;/i&gt; Quebec, 4 November 2005.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133653-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ISO 5667-3:2024 (2003) Water Quality&amp;#8212;Sampling: Part 3: Guidance on the Preservation and Handling of Water Samples. &lt;br&gt;https://www.iso.org/standard/33486.html </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133653-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rodier, J. (1996) L&amp;#8217;analyse de l&amp;#8217;eau naturelle, eaux r&amp;#233;siduaires, eau de mer. 8&amp;#233;me &amp;#233;dition, 1383 panadienne sur la Qualit&amp;#233; de l&amp;#8217;Eau. Qu&amp;#233;bec, Denod, Paris. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133653-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DIN (Deutsche Industrie Normes) (1992) D&amp;#233;termination de la Demande Biologique en Oxyg&amp;#232;ne (DBO) selon DIN Laboratoire National de l&amp;#8217;Environnement-Rabat. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133653-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">(DCO) selon DIN 38409-H52 (1992) Laboratoire National de l&amp;#8217;Environnement-Rabat. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133653-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DIN (Deutsche Industrie Normes) (1993) Dosage des nitrates par m&amp;#233;thode photom&amp;#233;trique avec 2,6-dim&amp;#233;thylph&amp;#233;nol (selon DIN 38405-D9-2). Laboratoire National de l&amp;#8217;Environnement-RDC. Rabat.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133653-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DIN (Deutsche Industrie Normes) (1993) Dosage des nitrites par m&amp;#233;thode photom&amp;#233;trique (selon ISO 6777 resp en 2677). Laboratoire National de l&amp;#8217;Environnement. Rabat.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133653-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Madhav, S., Ahamad, A., Singh, A.K., Kushawaha, J., Chauhan, J.S., Sharma, S. and Singh, P. (2020) Water Pollutants: Sources and Impact on the Environment and Human Health. In: Pooja, D., Kumar, P., Singh, P. and Patil, S., Eds., &lt;i&gt;Sensors in Water Pollutants Monitoring: Role of Material&lt;/i&gt;, Springer, Singapore, 43-62. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0671-0_4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133653-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Belghyti, D., El Guamri, Y., Ztit, G., &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2009) Caract&amp;#233;risation physico-chimique des eaux us&amp;#233;es d&amp;#8217;abattoir en vue de la mise en &amp;#339;uvre d&amp;#8217;un traitement ad&amp;#233;quat: Cas de K&amp;#233;nitra au Maroc. &lt;i&gt;Afrique Science&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;i&gt; Revue Internationale des Sciences et Technolo&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;gie&lt;/i&gt;, 5, 199-216. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/afsci.v5i2.61730</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133653-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kbibch, A., El khokh, K., Elkharrim, K.H. and Belghyti, D. (2011) Analyse de la pollution de l&amp;#8217;oued Mda par les eaux us&amp;#233;es domestiques de la ville de Souk Elarba du Gharb. MAROC. &lt;i&gt;ScienceLib&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Ed&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;itions&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Mersenne&lt;/i&gt;, 3, Article No. 110203.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133653-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Minist&amp;#232;re de l&amp;#8217;Environnement du Maroc (2002) Normes marocaines, Bulletin officiel du Maroc. N&amp;#176; 5062 du 30 ramadan 1423, Rabat. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133653-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miranda, L.A.S., Henriques, J.A.P. and Monteggia, L.O. (2005) A full-Scale Uasb Reactor for Treatment of Pig and Cattle Slaughterhouse Wastewater with a High Oil and Grease Content. &lt;i&gt;Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering&lt;/i&gt;, 22, 601-610. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-66322005000400013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133653-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thomas, O. (1995) Diagnostic de sols pollu&amp;#233;s par des hydrocarbures aromatiques polycycliques (HAP) a l&amp;#8217;aide de la spectrophotom&amp;#233;trie UV. &lt;br&gt;https://theses.hal.science/tel-00837762  </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133653-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mass&amp;#233;, D.I. and Masse, L. (2000) Treatment of Slaughterhouse Wastewater in Anaerobic Sequencing Batch Reactors. &lt;i&gt;Canadian Agricultural Engineering&lt;/i&gt;, 42, 131-137.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133653-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ONEP (1998) Approche de la typologie des eaux us&amp;#233;es urbaines au Maroc. ONEP et GTZ. Rabat. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133653-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hamdaoui, R. (2006) Caract&amp;#233;risation physico-chimique et traitement des eaux us&amp;#233;es r&amp;#233;siduaires de la soci&amp;#233;t&amp;#233; SETEXAME. Kenitra. M&amp;#233;moire DESA, Universit&amp;#233; Ibn Tofail. K&amp;#233;nitra.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133653-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Henze, M., Harremoes, P., Jansen, J.L.C. and Avrin, E. (1997) Wastewater Treatment. 2nd Edition, Springer, Berlin.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133653-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">EL Khokh, K., Kbibch, A., Elkharrim, K.H. and Belghyti, D. (2012) Evaluation de la charge polluante des eaux us&amp;#233;es de la ville de Mechraa Belksiri (MAROC). &lt;i&gt;Science&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Lib Editions Mersenne&lt;/i&gt;, 4, Article No. 121104.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>