Reliable clinical laboratory services are the backbone of modern medical practice and up to 70% of medical diagnoses may be based on laboratory results [1] . They represent a vital tool in the delivery of quality healthcare. Studies showed that 60% to 70% of clinical decisions concerning diagnosis, prescription and treatment follow-up are based on laboratory data [2] . In clinical diagnostic laboratories, the laboratory analysis process is divided into three phases: the pre-analytical phase, the analytical phase and the post-analytical phase [3] . The pre-analytical phase is subdivided into several stages. It begins by issuing a medical exam, followed by the client registration, and finally the collection and transportation of samples to laboratories [3] [4] . Biological tests are documents drafted by a practitioner (doctor, nurse, midwife) and given to a patient for whom the item to be prescribed is a paraclinical investigation in medical biology. The request form is a means of communication between clinicians and laboratory staff. It contains the patient’s demographic data, including first and last names, age and sex; the required biological analysis; the patient’s location, the date and time of request, and other details such as the prescriber’s contact, the reason for the prescription and the nature of the sample [5] . According to Adeoti and colleagues in 2004, a request forms is deemed acceptable and compliant when 80% and 100% respectively of the selected technical regularity items are mentioned by prescribers of healthcare centers [5] . The smooth running of later stages depends on the quality of its drafting. Unfortunately, in practice, some information is often omitted when request forms are drafted. This is confirmed by recent studies conducted in Burkina Faso and Niger, which found a low compliance rate for request forms [6] [7] . The lack of some information on request forms could not only influence its quality and patient care, but could also make unusable thousands of data produced by healthcare centers. Consequently, good practice or the quality of writing for request forms becomes a necessity for the practitioner and the biologist. In Côte d’Ivoire, few studies have investigated on the drafting quality of request forms, even though this is a source of concerns when researchers use the data. It is therefore necessary to provide an overview of the situation.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the drafting quality of request forms received at the Malaria and Parasitology Units at the Institut Pasteur de Cote d’Ivoire.

The drafting of a medical exam, an initial stage in the pre-analytical phase, initiates the start of a medical analysis. It requires some information about the prescriber and his department, the patient (his identity and clinical information), and about the sample. If an item is missing, the request forms will be non-compliant, which may have a direct impact on the results and therefore on the quality of healthcare provided to the patient, but this can also make thousand of data unusable by healthcare centers.

In this study, on 1990 request forms received at the Parasitology and Mycology Department, the place of residence, the clinical information, sex and age of the patient were the least to be noticed, with rates of 51.80%, 45.90%, 26.80% and 18% respectively. This might be due to the great number of patients, workload, as well as a lack of awareness among medical staff about essential information for a proper sample processing and reporting. According to the medical reference values, age and sex are important for some parameters, helping to improve interpretation of results, as in the case of request forms for toxoplasmosis.

Several recent studies, like those of Tola and colleagues in 2022 in Ethiopia and Kadour et al. 2022 in Niger, said that age and sex were not reported by 7.9% and 8.4% respectively in Ethiopia [8] and 11.31% and 38.93% [7] . In Burkina Faso, Yacouba et al. said that the absence of notification of these two elements (age and sex) represents about 3.3% and 5.7% of request forms respectively during their study [6] .

In this study, the absence of clinical information represented 49.5% of the request forms. Reporting clinical information on the request forms highlights the prescriber’s investigation about medical results. It is important to record clinical information when drafting a medical exam.

It helps the prescriber to transcribe useful information for the biologist. Our results are much better than those reported in the study of N’da in Cameroon, who found that 76.21% of the biological analysis bulletin did not include clinical information [9] . Similarly, studies carried out in Nigeria reported that 54.7% of request forms did not include clinical information [10] . However, the proportion of request formsfor which the clinical information was not reported was much higher than that found in the study of Keppens et al. Those authors pointed out that only 26.4% of the forms did not contain clinical information [11] .

In this study, the majority of requests for request forms were prescribed by medical doctors (83.90%). Nurses prescribed 15 request forms (0.80%) and midwives 4 (0.2%). The results obtained in this study are clearly higher than those obtained in Kadour’s study, in which medical doctors accounted for 69.42% of prescribers. In fact, the majority of prescribing medical doctors would like request forms to be carried out in the laboratories of the Institut Pasteur de Cote d’Ivoire [7] .

Those prescribers recommend patients to performe their request forms at the Institut Pasteur de Côte d’Ivoire because of the reliability of results. Furthermore, this research institution has not only a high-performance, new-generation diagnostic tools, but also has a qualified staff in all disciplines. Medical confirmation of suspicion is the proof of diagnosis before the patient is given the recommended treatment by doctors.

The quality of request forms received at the Institut Pasteur de Côte d’Ivoire at the Malaria and Parasitology units was assessed according to the recommendations of the request forms good drafting practice. The results showed that out of a total of 1990 request forms, only 108 (5.4%) were deemed acceptable. Not a single request forms complied with the request forms drafting requirements. This appalling result reflects the poor quality of request forms drafted by prescribers of healthcare centers in Côte d’Ivoire.

Omission of a single item could affect the quality of the request forms drafting, patient care could even increase the delivery time of result. Furthermore, this poor quality drafting could make unusable thousands of data providing by healthcare centers. Studies carried out by Kadour and colleagues in 2022 in Niger found that 9.45% of request forms contained all required items [7] . In Burkina Faso, the results reported by Yacouba and colleagues in 2019 showed that only 4.2% of the request forms in their study had the required drafting quality [6] . Another study conducted in Nigeria showed that only 8% of a total of 4638 forms provided all the required data [12] . The results of Kipkulei et al. 2019 showed that on 289 forms evaluated, only 1% (3/289) had all the required information [13] . It should be noted that among those deemed acceptable, almost all (97.2%) were requested by medical doctors. This confirms not only the professionalism of medical doctors, but also the authenticity of the request forms they issued.

Three places of origin of request forms were mentioned in this study. After analysis, it was found that the Institut Pasteur de Côte d’Ivoire was the biggest issuer of request forms with a rate of 49.4%, followed by the other healthcare centres with a rate of 36.9% and finally University Hospitals with a rate of 12.5%. Only 1.1% request forms included in this study did not bear the name of issuing departments. It should be noted that, in order to improve the management of samples by target laboratories, additional tests are internally added, depending on the number of laboratories involved. This might be the reason for the large number of request forms coming from the Institut Pasteur de Côte d’Ivoire.

Moreover, out of 108 request forms which quality drafting was deemed acceptable, 56.5% were from University Hospitals. This could be explained by the large number of medical doctors at university hospital departments. University Hospitals are the main place for medical doctors practical training in Côte d’Ivoire. The majority of prescribers at the University Hospitals rely on their professionalism and rigor.

The conformity of request forms received at the malaria and parasitology laboratories at the Institut Pasteur de Côte d’Ivoire was assessed according to the requirements on good drafting practice. The results of this study show that the quality of drafting for request forms is poor in healthcare centers in Côte d’Ivoire. The essential information required on request forms is often missing. Conversely, the availability of key information could help to easily use data from healthcare centers.

The authors are grateful to the staff of the Reception and Sample Collection Unit (RSCU) at the Institut Pasteur de Cote d’Ivoire. We are also thankful to the staff of Parasitology-Mycology Department for their collaboration.

YSS participated in data collection and entry. OY contributed in data analysis. YSS, SB and AAB were involved in drafting of manuscript. YSS, NKBT and NTL contributed in topic framing. SB helped to proofread the manuscript. SB and TAO oversaw the study.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Serge-Stéphane, Y., Aristide, A.A.B., Beourou, S., Yacouba, O., Landry, N.T., Thierry-Borel, N.K. and Offianan, T.A. (2024) Assessment of the Drafting Quality of Request Forms Submitted to the Malaria and Parasitology Units at the Institut Pasteur de Cote d’Ivoire. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 12, 330-339. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2024.125025