<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJSS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Soil Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2162-5360</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojss.2024.145017</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJSS-133558</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Improvement of Rice Plant Root by Kaolin Application in Iron Toxicity Condition at Zoukougbeu (Central-West of C&amp;#244;te d&amp;#8217;Ivoire)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sehi</surname><given-names>Zokagon Sylvain</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Konan</surname><given-names>Kouassi Urbain</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Adechina</surname><given-names>Olayossimi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ouattara</surname><given-names>Amidou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kouam&amp;#233;</surname><given-names>Firmin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bongoua</surname><given-names>Jeanne Devisme</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cherif</surname><given-names>Mamadou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Brahima</surname><given-names>Kon&amp;#233;</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>D&amp;amp;#233;partement Agriculture et Technologie Nouvelle, Universit&amp;amp;#233; de San-Pedro, San-Pedro, C&amp;amp;#244;te d'Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Unit&amp;amp;#233; de Formation et de Recherche en Agroforesterie, D&amp;amp;#233;partement des Sciences de la Terre, Universit&amp;amp;#233; Jean Lorougnon Gu&amp;amp;#233;d&amp;amp;#233; de Daloa, Daloa, C&amp;amp;#244;te d&amp;amp;#8217;Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>D&amp;amp;#233;patartement des Sciences du sol, Universit&amp;amp;#233; Felix Houphouet Boigny, Abidjan, C&amp;amp;#244;te d&amp;amp;#8217;Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>D&amp;amp;#233;partement de Physiologie V&amp;amp;#233;g&amp;amp;#233;tale, Universit&amp;amp;#233; Felix Houphouet Boigny, Abidjan, C&amp;amp;#244;te d&amp;amp;#8217;Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>D&amp;amp;#233;partement des Sciences et Techniques, Universit&amp;amp;#233; Alassane Ouattara, Bouak&amp;amp;#233;, C&amp;amp;#244;te d&amp;amp;#8217;Ivoire</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>05</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>308</fpage><lpage>318</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>25,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2024</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In the tropics, lowland rice cultivation is often confronted with the problem of iron toxicity. The solution proposed by research in general is the use of industrial silicon. However, the high cost of industrial silicon limits its adoption by farmers. A study was carried out in Zakogbeu; Center-West of C&amp;#244;te d&amp;#8217;Ivoire, to assess the potential of kaolin to mitigate the effect of this soil constraint on the root of the rice plant. Five kaolin-based treatments were analyzed (T&lt;sub&gt;0 &lt;/sub&gt;= 0 kg kaolin ha&lt;sup&gt;&amp;#8722;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;, T&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt; = 366 kg kaolin ha&lt;sup&gt;&amp;#8722;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;, T&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; = 736 kg kaolin ha&lt;sup&gt;&amp;#8722;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;, T&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; = 1097 kg kaolin ha&lt;sup&gt;&amp;#8722;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt; and T&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; = 1465 kg kaolin ha&lt;sup&gt;&amp;#8722;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt; are 0, 200, 400, 600 and 800 kg SiO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; ha&lt;sup&gt;&amp;#8722;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;) in a device in complete random blocks, with 5 repetitions. The results obtained show that kaolin supply increases the length of the root tissue as well as the number of branching of the root of the rice plant. Root tissue increased from 10 cm with T&lt;sub&gt;0&lt;/sub&gt; treatment to more than 15 cm with treatment T&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;. The microscopic observation of the roots shows that in the treatment T&lt;sub&gt;0&lt;/sub&gt;, the roots present only primary ramifications and the tertiary and quaternary ramifications are observed with the treatments T&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; and T&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;. The contribution of kaolin is an alternative to inhibit the effect of iron toxicity on the rice plant root development in iron toxicity condition.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Iron Toxicity</kwd><kwd> Kaolin</kwd><kwd> Root</kwd><kwd> Rice</kwd><kwd> Cote d&amp;#8217;Ivoire</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is among the oldest plants cultivated in a very large cultivation area, extending between latitudes 45˚ North and South [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref1">1</xref>] . It constitutes the basic food or even the main food of more than half of the world’s population; its culture contributes to sustainable development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref2">2</xref>] . In West and Central Africa, demand for rice was 9.9 million tonnes in 2006, well above production. In Ivory Coast, rice has also become the main staple of the population. However, its production struggles to meet this local requirement [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref4">4</xref>] because of numerous constraints of cropping. Among those constraints diagnosed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref6">6</xref>] there is iron toxicity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref8">8</xref>] which can reduce yields by 10% - 100% in lowlands [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref9">9</xref>] . However, it is this agro ecology that offers a great chance of self-sufficiency in rice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref10">10</xref>] . This abiotic constraint occurs in more than 60% of the lowlands of West Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref12">12</xref>] . Variety screening studies in the hot spot Korhogo salient point (savannah) in northern C&#244;te d’Ivoire are taking place as well as testing of agronomic practices that can increase the tolerance of varieties to iron toxicity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref14">14</xref>] . But the effectiveness of the recommendations made was unreliable with seasonal variabilities, including those linked to sites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref15">15</xref>] . As observed elsewhere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref18">18</xref>] with the exception of drainage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref19">19</xref>] whose major effect is the reversibility of Fe<sup>2+</sup> to Fe<sup>3+</sup>. However, the yield of lowland rice is very dependent on the quantity and duration of water submersion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref20">20</xref>] . Hence the need to develop a strategy for the oxidation of ferrous iron in flooded conditions in rice-growing lowlands susceptible to iron toxicity. To this end, the potential of silicon (Si) to reinforce the tolerance of plants to biotic and abiotic stresses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref23">23</xref>] is rightly of concern given the oxidizing power of Si in the rice rhizosphere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref24">24</xref>] . Silicon is known for its ability to reduce the effect of numerous toxicities of edaphic origin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref26">26</xref>] . Faced with such evidence, it is access to commercial silicon that remains an obstacle to the adoption of this technology due to the high cost and availability on the local market. Hence, the need for a less expensive alternative source. This is why the current study aims to explore the potential of kaolin (54.7% SiO<sub>2</sub>) as a natural source of silicon in rice cultivation.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Material</title><sec id="s2_1_1"><title>2.1.1. Experiment Site</title><p>The study takes place in the central west of C&#244;te d’Ivoire, in the village of Zakogbeu located at 06˚46'57.8&quot;N; 06˚48'58.6&quot;W; 227 m. the climate of this zone is transitional equatorial type characterized by an alternation of two (2) rainy seasons with two (2) dry seasons. The first rainy season is from March to mid-July, and the second from August to mid-November. The first dry season, also called the long dry season, is between mid-November and the end of February. The second, shorter dry season is sometimes similar to a simple slowdown in rains between mid-July and mid-August in certain localities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref27">27</xref>] . Annual rainfall is generally between 1100 mm and 1400 mm, for an average temperature oscillating between 19˚C and 33˚C. Ferralsols type soils are deep and fertile [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref28">28</xref>] . The lowland that was the subject of our study is located 200 m east of the village of Zakogbeu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref29">29</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_1_2"><title>2.1.2. Vegetal Material</title><p>WITA 9 (WARA-IITA 9) resulting from the genetic cross between varieties IR2042-178 and CT19 was used as the rice variety to be tested due to its sensitivity to iron toxicity. It has a cycle of 120 days, an average yield of 6 t&#183;ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> with a potential of 10 t&#183;ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>. The average plant height is 92 cm with an average of 205 tillers per square meter.</p></sec><sec id="s2_1_3"><title>2.1.3. Kaolin from Bingerville</title><p>Kaolin is a kaolinite-type clay rock, silico-aluminous with secondary minerals such as quartz, micas, feldspars, titanium oxides, iron and manganese oxides and hydroxides (Pouliquen, 2014). It is a pedological formation as a product of clayey alteration belonging to the family of phyllosilicates with a structure of type 1:1, an equidistance of approximately 7&#197; and it is of dioctahedral type. Bingerville kaolin extracted in an artisanal quarry (5˚20'47&quot;N 3˚52'59&quot;W 15 m), of 10 hectares in area with an exploitable layer of kaolin 40 m thick was used during this study. It has a light pink color (7.5 YR8/7) with 61% fine fraction (diameter &lt; 2 &#181;m). The main oxides that compose it are SiO<sub>2</sub>, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, MgO, MnO, K<sub>2</sub>O, CaO, TiO<sub>2</sub> P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and Na<sub>2</sub>O (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Method</title><sec id="s2_2_1"><title>2.2.1. Root Sampling and Determining of Root Biomass</title><p>After harvest, ten roots (10 pockets) were harvested from the center of each unit plot. Then the roots were washed in canal water to remove mud and then dried</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Mass percentages of the main oxides contained in Bingerville kaolin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref29">29</xref>] </title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Oxides</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mass Pourcentages (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MgO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MnO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CaO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>in the sun for 72 hours. These roots were analyzed in the laboratory to determine their morphology and biomass.</p><p>The biomass of each root was weighed (Pt) according to the test treatments. Another weighted weighing (P50) was carried out in the same way, by choosing randomly 50 roots at random, for a second weighing, for each of the treatments.</p><p>Then, using a ruler, the average length and width of the ten root per treatment were determined.</p><p>In addition, the mass of ten (10) roots long of 10 cm and the root density were determined for each treatment.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_2"><title>2.2.2. Observation of Root Morphology</title><p>For the observation of root morphology, ten (10) roots long of 10 cm were taken from the root taken in each treatment. These ten roots were observed under an optical microscope, at a magnification of 1000&#215;, to determine the different types of branching as well as the number of branching for each type per treatment. The observation was made using a LEICA type microscope. A camera incorporated into the microscope allowed images of the elements observed to be taken.</p><p>A reliability analysis was carried out to study the occurrence of soil nutrients on the iron toxicity score with the Statistic software.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Macroscopic Observations</title><p>The observation of the different lengths of the root tissues obtained following the kaolin treatment shows a clear variation in them (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Indeed, the lengths of the root tissues change with the increase in the doses of kaolin. We see that the length of the root tissue obtained with treatment T<sub>0</sub> is short (8 - 10 cm) while that of treatment T<sub>1</sub> is (10 - 12 cm). The length of the root tissue of treatment T<sub>2</sub> is greater than the previous ones (12 - 14 cm) and treatment T<sub>3</sub> has a length of root tissue greater than those already mentioned (14 - 15 cm). The most pronounced root tissue length is that of treatment T<sub>4</sub>, which displays a length greater than 15 cm.</p><p>The addition of kaolin improves the development of the rice rhizosphere. The</p><p>doses 1097 kg kaolin ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> (T<sub>3</sub>) and 1465 kg kaolin ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> (T<sub>4</sub>) of kaolin allowed the development of the length of the root tissue of the rice plant under iron toxicity conditions.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Microscopic Observations</title><p>The results of microscopic observation of the roots (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) show that the addition of kaolin increases the number of root branches of the rice plant. A single branching is observed with the control treatment T<sub>0</sub> (0 kg kaolin ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>), and up to five branches with the treatments T<sub>3</sub> (1097 kg kaolin ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) and T<sub>4</sub> (1465 kg kaolin ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>). We see at the level of treatment T<sub>0</sub>, in addition to the main root, we only have secondary roots. The roots resulting from the T<sub>1</sub> treatment present tertiary branching in addition to primary and secondary roots. Likewise, at the level of treatment T<sub>2</sub> we also observe the tertiary roots, but, at this level, we have a high number of tertiary roots unlike the treatment T<sub>1</sub>. For treatment T<sub>3</sub>, there is an appearance of quaternary roots, as in treatment T<sub>4</sub>, but with a greater number of quaternary roots.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Relationship between Treatments and Root Parameters</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> presents the average values of the root parameters measured on ten roots. These are the mass of 10 roots of 10 cm, the root density, the mass of 10 roots fabrics and the number of root branches. The effects of the treatments are very highly significant (p &lt; 0.0001) on the root parameters considered. Indeed, the smallest average values are obtained with the T<sub>0</sub> treatment, and these values increase following increasing doses of kaolin. We note an average root length of 16.18 cm under treatment T<sub>0</sub>, this value evolves increasingly to reach the value of 20.58 cm with treatment T<sub>4</sub>, an increase of 4.4 cm compared to T<sub>0</sub>. Likewise, root density increased from 0.04 g/cm<sup>3</sup> with treatment T<sub>0</sub> to 0.08 g/cm<sup>3</sup> with treatment T<sub>4</sub> with a probability p &lt; 0.0001. The trends remained identical at the level of the other parameters measured. It emerges from this analysis that respectively 1097 and 1465 kg kaolin ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> T<sub>3</sub> and T<sub>4</sub> stand out from the other treatments by the high average values of the root parameters.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Relationship between Iron Toxicity Score and Root Parameters</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> presents the correlation between the root parameters and the iron toxicity score on the leaves of the plant in each treatment. Analysis of the table shows that the length and width of the root tissues are perfectly correlated (R = −0.86 and R = −0.68) with the iron toxicity score in T<sub>3</sub> and T<sub>4</sub>, with a respective probability, p = 0.02 and p = 0.02. The treatments had a significant effect on the root length and width of rice plants. Root density is strongly correlated with the iron toxicity score on the leaf R = −0.95 and p &lt; 0.0001. The addition of kaolin had a very significant positive effect on root density.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> presents the reliable soil parameters for the description of the root length of the rice plant under iron toxicity condition. We note that the reliable soil parameters for the description of root length are Ca, Mg, Fe, Zn, Si, pHeau</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Average values of root parameters following treatments</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >Roots parameters</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Width (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Length (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Number of ramifications</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Mass (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Root density (g/cm<sup>3</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Root</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 roots of 10 cm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>0</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.64a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.18a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.74a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.057a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.72a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.68b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112.51a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.064a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.20a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.47c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >126.02a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.24a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.57d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >192.25b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.088b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.29a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.58e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >198.51b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.109c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08d</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CV (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >146.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.078</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P &gt; F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5849</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Relationships between root parameters and leaf symptom score, iron toxicity of rice in treatments, T<sub>2</sub>, T<sub>3</sub> and T<sub>4</sub> at maturity</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Iron toxicity score</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >T<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >T<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >T<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P &gt; |r|</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P &gt; |r|</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P &gt; |r|</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average width of 10 roots</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average length of 10 roots</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mass of 10 roots</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Root density</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mass of 10 roots</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number of root ramification</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iron toxicity score on the plante</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>- : Note determinated.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Determination of reliable soil parameters for description of rice plant root length</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Analysis 1</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Analysis 2</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Analysis 3</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Analysis 4</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Analysis 5</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="10"  >Root length</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cor with total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alpha</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cor with total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alpha</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cor with total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alpha</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cor with total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alpha</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cor with total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alpha</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Si</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH<sub>eau</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ev (mV)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alpha</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.76</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>and Ev with a value of apha = 0.82 at the level of analysis 4. This is justified by the fact that the deletion of one of these parameters leads to the reduction of the value of apha to 0.76. There is a stronger contribution from K (α = 0.90) with, however, a weak correlation (−0.10) with the other parameters, although weak. With the exception of pH (0.53; 0.81), the other reliability parameters have the same orders of magnitude.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>In the absence of kaolin, the rice root development was limited to the primary ramification and increased to the quaternary branches, in parallel with the increasing doses of kaolin, and this, in accordance with the assertions of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref29">29</xref>] . Given the activating role of P in root growth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref30">30</xref>] , the addition of kaolin would not only have stimulated the appearance of new roots, but also the absorption of phosphorus, despite the oxidation of iron in deposit on the oldest roots.</p><p>The analysis of variance of the weight of the root tissues, of 10 roots of 10 cm, and of the root density shows that there is a significant difference between the treatments. Treatments T<sub>3</sub> and T<sub>4</sub> gave weights higher than the general average obtained at the level of each parameter. This increase in the weight of the different parts of the roots could be explained by the rust deposit observed on the roots, which would be due to the oxidation of iron on the roots. Indeed, the work of Sehi and collaborators and Sehi showed that the rice plant naturally develops mechanisms to cope with excessive iron concentration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref29">29</xref>] . According to Sehi, the rice plant inhibits the absorption of iron through the oxidation of the rhizosphere, which promotes the passage from Fe<sup>2+</sup> to Fe<sup>3+</sup> in the rhizospheric zone, hence the rust deposition on the roots under conditions of iron toxicity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref29">29</xref>] . Bongoua, maintains that the plant develops an iron exclusion system on the root surface [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref31">31</xref>] . When these root barriers are crossed, the plant resorts to mechanisms of adaptation or enzymatic inactivation of iron in plant tissues [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref32">32</xref>] . The resistance of these different barriers depends on several factors, in particular, the duration of the stress. Indeed, longer the duration of stress is, less the resistant these barriers will be [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref33">33</xref>] . The observation of the symptoms of iron toxicity in the T<sub>0</sub> treatment during this work confirms such an assertion. The addition of kaolin inhibited the absorption of Fe<sup>2+</sup> by strengthening the oxidative barrier of the rhizosphere of the rice plant. Kaolin enhances the rice plant’s tolerance to iron toxicity.</p><p>Chemical silicon, hitherto indicated as a way of resolving stress and toxicity problems in plants, particularly in rice plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133558-ref34">34</xref>] , through this result, we are able to affirm that kaolin is now proving to be a way of sustainable and low-cost resolution of iron toxicity, which slows down rice cultivation in the lowlands in several regions of Africa, and which, consequently, accentuates deforestation. In addition to solving the problem of toxicity in rice, kaolin promotes the root development of the rice plant, which is manifested by the increase in root length. The action of kaolin on the roots will allow the plant to explore a larger volume of soil, which improves yield. The adoption of kaolin to resolve the problem of iron toxicity in the lowlands would contribute to the fight against climate change, because rice growing in the lowlands allows the preservation of the forest. Despite all the possible criticisms, we will inevitably remember that the root parameters displayed a greater reliability (α = 0.82) of the expression of iron toxicity than the visual symptoms of scoring (α = 0.76). The silicon (Si) provided by Kaolin has one of the highest alpha values (α = 0.77) after those of Ev, pH and Mg.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Iron toxicity is an abiotic constraint that affects the rice plant agronomic parameters such as roots. This study focused on reducing the effect of iron toxicity on the development of the roots of the rice plant by adding successive doses of kaolin. The results show that the addition of kaolin promotes the development of the roots of the rice plant by increasing the number of root ramification and the length of the roots.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Sylvain, S.Z., Urbain, K.K., Olayossimi, A., Amidou, O., Firmin, K., Devisme, B.J., Mamadou, C. and Kon&#233;, B. (2024) Improvement of Rice Plant Root by Kaolin Application in Iron Toxicity Condition at Zoukougbeu (Central-West of C&#244;te D’Ivoire). Open Journal of Soil Science, 14, 308-318. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2024.145017</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.133558-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vijay, D. and Roy, B. (2013) Rice (&lt;i&gt;Oryza sativa&lt;/i&gt; L.). Breeding, Biotechnology and Seed Production of Field Crops. New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi. 71-122.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nwilene, F. E. K. F., Nwanze, and Okhidievbe O. (2006) African Rice Gall Midge: Biology, and Control-Field Guide and Technical Manuel. Africa Rice Center (WARDA), Cotonou.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chimene Dominique, K.B.A. (2019) Analyse des d&amp;#233;terminants du choix et de l&amp;#8217;adoption de vari&amp;#233;t&amp;#233;s am&amp;#233;lior&amp;#233;es de riz. Cas des zones de Gagnoa et de Korhogo en c&amp;#244;te d&amp;#8217;ivoire. M&amp;#233;moire de fin de cycle Pour l&amp;#8217;obtention du Dipl&amp;#244;me d&amp;#8217;Ing&amp;#233;nieur des Techniques Agricoles. Institut National Polytechnique F&amp;#233;lix Houphou&amp;#235;t Boigny (INPHB), Yamoussoukro.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sehi, Z.S. (2021) Usage du kaolin pour la tol&amp;#233;rance du riz &amp;#224; la toxicit&amp;#233; ferreuse: R&amp;#233;silience de l&amp;#8217;agriculture face aux changements climatiques. Th&amp;#232;se de doctorat, Universit&amp;#233; F&amp;#233;lix Houphou&amp;#235;t Boigny.  </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">CCR-B (2011) Rapport 2011 du Comit&amp;#233; de Concertation des Riziculteurs du B&amp;#233;nin. 13 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akassimadou, E.F., Kon&amp;#233;, B., Yao, G.F., Zadi, F., Konan, F., Traor&amp;#233;, M.J. and Yao-Kouam&amp;#233;, A. (2014) Rice Response to Phosphorus and Potassium in Fluvisol of Second Order Lowland in a Guinea Savanna Zone of Sub-Saharan Africa. &lt;i&gt;Intern&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;tional Journal of Plant &amp; Soil Science&lt;/i&gt;, 3, 232-247. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.9734/IJPSS/2014/6532</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Genon, J.G., de Hepcee, N., Dufey, J.E., Delvaux, B. and Hennebert, P.A. (1994) Iron and Other Chemical Soil Constraints to Rice in Highland Swamps of Burundi. &lt;i&gt;Plant and Soil&lt;/i&gt;, 166, 109-115. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02185487</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dobermann, A. and Fairhurst, T.H. (2000) Rice Nutrient Disorders and Nutrient Management. International Rice Research Institute, Philippines, 191-197. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kon&amp;#233;, B. (2014) Sustaining Rice Production in Tropical Africa: Coping with Rice Yield Gap and Declining Yield. Lap Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbr&amp;#252;cken.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sehi, Z.S., Konan, K.F., Bongoua, J.D., Kon&amp;#233;, B., Cherif, M., Kon&amp;#233;, D. and Yao-Kouam&amp;#233;, A. (2019) Effect of Kaolin on Rice Production in Ferrous Toxicity Condition. &lt;i&gt;Scholars Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences&lt;/i&gt;, 6, 2348-1854 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bao, X., Lui, Z., Wu, J. and Yu, T. (1964) Studies on Oxidation-Reduction Process in Paddy Soils. VII, Forms of Ferrous Iron. &lt;i&gt;Acta Pedologica Sinica&lt;/i&gt;, 12, 297-306.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahmadi, N. and Teme, B. (1998) Am&amp;#233;nagement et mise en valeur des bas-fonds au Mali: bilan et perspectives nationales, int&amp;#233;r&amp;#234;t pour la zone de savane ouest-africaine (Sikasso, 21-25 Octobre 1996). Am&amp;#233;nagement et mise en valeur des bas-fonds au Mali. Colloque-CIRAD 1998, 491 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sahrawat, K.L., Mulbah, C.K., Diatta, S., Delaune, R.D., Patrick, W.H.J., Singh, B.N. and Jones, M.P. (1996) The Role of Tolerant Genotypes and Plant Nutrients in the Management of Iron Toxicity in Lowland Rice. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Agricultural Science&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;126, 143-149. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185960007307X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Audebert, A. and Fofana, M. (2009) Rice Yield Gap Due to Iron Toxicity in West Africa. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science&lt;/i&gt;, 196, 66-76. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00339.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sahrawat, K.L. and Diatta, S. (1995) Nutrient Management and Season Affect Soil Iron Toxicity. Annual Report 1994. West Africa Rice Development Association, Bouak&amp;#233; Cote d&amp;#8217;Ivoire. 34-35.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sahrawat, K.L. and Singh, B.N. (1998) Seasonal Differences in Iron Toxicity Tolerance of Lowland Rice Cultivars. &lt;i&gt;International Rice Research Notes&lt;/i&gt;, 23, 18-19.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haefele, S.M., Wopereis, M.C.S. and Donovan, C. (2002) Farmers&amp;#8217; Perceptions, Practices and Performance in Sahelian Irrigated Rice Schem. &lt;i&gt;Experimental Agr&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;i&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;culture&lt;/i&gt;, 38, 197-310. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/S001447970200025X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dufey, I., Hiel, M.P., Hakizimana, P., Draye, X., Lutts, S., Kon&amp;#233;, B., Dram&amp;#233;, K.N., Konat&amp;#233;, K.A., Sie, M. and Bertin, P. (2012) Multi-Environment QTL Mapping and Consistency across Environments of Resistance Mechanisms to Ferrous Iron Toxicity in Rice. &lt;i&gt;Crop Science&lt;/i&gt;, 52, 539-550. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2009.09.0544</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fageria, N.K., Santos, N.A.B., Barbosa, M.P. and Quimanqes, C.M. (2008) Iron Toxicity in Lowland Rice. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Plant Nutrition&lt;/i&gt;, 31, 1676-1699. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160802244902</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ofori</surname><given-names> E</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Kyei-Baffour</surname><given-names> N.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Mensah E. and Agyare</surname><given-names> W.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2010</year>)<article-title>Yield Gap Analysis in Rice Production from Stakeholders&amp;#8217; Perspective at Annum Valley Bottom Irrigation Project at Nobewam in Ghana</article-title><source> &lt;i&gt;Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science&lt;/i&gt;</source><volume> 5</volume>,<fpage> 50</fpage>-<lpage>57</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Belanger, R.R., Bowen, P.A., Ehret, D.L. and Menzies, J.G. (1995) Soluble Silicon, Its Role in Crops and Disease Management of Greenhouse Crops. &lt;i&gt;Plant Disease&lt;/i&gt;, 79, 329-336 &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-79-0329</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Epstein, E. (1999) Silicon. &lt;i&gt;Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology&lt;/i&gt;, 50, 641-664. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.641</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ma, J.F., Miyake, Y. and Takahashi, E. (2001) Chapter 2 Silicon as a Beneficial Element for Crop Plants. &lt;i&gt;Studies in Plant Science&lt;/i&gt;, 8, 17-39. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-3420(01)80006-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Savant, N.K., Snyder, G.H. and Datnoff, L.E. (1997) Silicon Management and Sustainable Rice Production. &lt;i&gt;Advances in Agronomy&lt;/i&gt;, 58, 151-199. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60255-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, S.G., Kim, K.W., Park, E.W. and Choi, D. (2002) Silicon-Induced Cell Wall Fortification of Rice Leaves: A Possible Mechanism of Enhanced Host Resistance to Blast. &lt;i&gt;Phytopathology&lt;/i&gt;, 92, 1095-1103. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.10.1095</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fawe, A. Menzies, J.G., Ch&amp;#233;rif, M. and B&amp;#233;langer, R.R. (2001) Chapter 9 Silicon and Disease Resistance in Dicotyledons. &lt;i&gt;Studies in Plant Science&lt;/i&gt;, 8, 159-169. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-3420(01)80013-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kouakou</surname><given-names> K.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname>E.</surname><given-names> Kouassi</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> A.</surname><given-names> Kouassi</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> F.W.</surname><given-names> Goula</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> B.T.A. and Savane</surname><given-names> I. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2013</year>)<article-title>D&amp;#233;termination des p&amp;#233;riodes optimales de semis du riz pluvial au Centre-ouest de la C&amp;#244;te d&amp;#8217;Ivoire</article-title><source> &lt;i&gt;International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies&lt;/i&gt;</source><volume> 3</volume>,<fpage> 719</fpage>-<lpage>726</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kon&amp;#233;, B. and Assa, A. (2008) Evaluation de l&amp;#8217;h&amp;#233;t&amp;#233;rog&amp;#233;n&amp;#233;it&amp;#233; des sols ferrallitiques par la couleur selon le code de Munsell. &lt;i&gt;Agronomie Africaine&lt;/i&gt;, 20, 179-190. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/aga.v20i2.1745</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sehi, Z.S. (2021) Usage du kaolin pour la tol&amp;#233;rance du riz &amp;#224; la toxicit&amp;#233; ferreuse: R&amp;#233;silience de l&amp;#8217;agriculture face aux changements climatiques. Th&amp;#232;se de doctorat, Universit&amp;#233; F&amp;#233;lix Houphou&amp;#235;t Boigny, Abidjan.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marc, L. (2001) Le plant de riz, Donn&amp;#233;es morphologiques et cycle de la plante. M&amp;#233;mento Technique de Riziculture, 22 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bongoua, A.J.D. (2009) Implications des communaut&amp;#233;s bact&amp;#233;riennes ferri-r&amp;#233;ductrices et des et des param&amp;#232;tres environnementaux dans le fonctionnement et la qualit&amp;#233; des sols de rizi&amp;#232;res (Tha&amp;#239;lande et Cote d&amp;#8217;Ivoire). Th&amp;#232;se de doctorat, Universit&amp;#233; Henri Poincar&amp;#233;-Nancy 1. Nancy.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cherif, M., Zouzou, M., Fofana, M. and Audebert, A. (2007) Effet de la toxicit&amp;#233; du fer sur l&amp;#8217;activit&amp;#233; photosynth&amp;#233;tique du riz. &lt;i&gt;Agronomie Africaine&lt;/i&gt;, 19, 161-172. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/aga.v19i2.1712</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tam, A.M. (2006) Physiological Mechanisms of Iron Toxicity Tolerance in Lowland Rice. Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES) Department of Plant Nutrition, 75-80.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133558-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ma, J.F. and Takahashi, E. (2002) Soil, Fertilizer, and Plant Silicon Research in Japan, Elsevier, Amsterdam.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>