<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJAS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Animal Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-7597</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojas.2024.143011</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJAS-133280</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Effects of Zinc Sulfate on the &lt;i&gt;in Vitro&lt;/i&gt; Digestibility of Feeds in Cervids
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Reese</surname><given-names>J. Thibodoeax</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Philip</surname><given-names>M. Urso</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Stanley</surname><given-names>F. Kelley</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Marcy</surname><given-names>M. Beverly</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chris</surname><given-names>R. Stewart</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ian</surname><given-names>C. Dunn</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Gentech Diagnostics, Dallas, Texas, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Animal Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>3-S Texas Outdoors/3-S Whitetails, Bedias, Texas, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>School of Agricultural Sciences, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas, USA</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day><month>05</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>157</fpage><lpage>167</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>19,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2024</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>20,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>23,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The captive white-tailed deer industry has an estimated impact of 1.6 billion USD in the state of Texas alone. However, nutritional requirements for cervids are determined through research based on sheep and goats. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of zinc on differences in dry matter digestibility &lt;i&gt;in vitro&lt;/i&gt; for white-tailed does (&lt;i&gt;Odocoileus&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;virginianus&lt;/i&gt;). Deer (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;= 2) were ethically harvested, rumens were collected, and placed into a cooler containing warm water. Rumen contents were agitated, and fluid was filtered using cheese cloth while applying CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;. Fluid was placed into four separate incubator jars with filter bags containing a 1:1 alfalfa to coastal hay blend. Zinc doses of 0.073 mg/kg/d equivalents were added to two of the jars ( Zn), and the additional two jars received 0.00 mg/kg/d (CON). Following 48 h of incubation, &lt;i&gt;in vitro&lt;/i&gt; true digestibility (IVTD) showed no significant differences between the control and the treatment groups. Average dry matter digested &lt;i&gt;in &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;vitro&lt;/i&gt; was 91.87% and 95.13%, respectively. There were no differences detected in ADF, NDF, IVTD, or OM between the treatment groups. While no detectable differences were observed in this study, this methodology did prove to be viable and functional for microbial digestion &lt;i&gt;in vitro&lt;/i&gt;. This study can be replicated with multiple experimental units to confirm the observations of increased digestibility. Formal nutritional guidelines can be created to allow for more efficient feeding of cervids thereby reducing feed costs and continuing the growth of the captive deer industry.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Zinc</kwd><kwd> IVDMD</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;In &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Vitro&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Cervids</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In recent years, species such as axis (Axis axis), white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), fallow (Dama dama), and red deer (Cervuselaphus) have become a specialty livestock in the United States [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref1">1</xref>] . The captive deer breeding industry produces 1.6 billion USD annually in Texas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref1">1</xref>] . The industry is growing, but there is a need for data to create nutritional baselines to aid in management practices that range from formulating feed rations to breeding protocols and standards of healthcare. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref2">2</xref>] has collected research performed on the requirements for microminerals and vitamins in cervids. There is data collected from a myriad of small ruminants, but there is limited information from captive-managed cervids. Therefore, research findings using other small ruminants, such as sheep and goats are often applied to cervids.</p><p>It is well known that the essential trace mineral zinc influences metabolism, growth, and reproduction in domestic animals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref3">3</xref>] . Slight over-rationing of zinc may improve the animal’s overall well-being, especially during times of stress or disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref4">4</xref>] . This could be due to the antioxidant characteristics trace minerals like zinc possess; for zinc is a crucial micromineral for the immune system and growth in deer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref5">5</xref>] . Zinc also increases digestibility in ruminants through a variety of methods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref3">3</xref>] . The main mode of action of zinc driving efficiency is through improving microbial efficiency in the rumen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref3">3</xref>] . While these differences in ADG, feed efficiency, DMI, and reproduction are well documented in large and small domestic ruminants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref3">3</xref>] , it is currently unknown if zinc affects white-tailed deer in similar ways.</p><p>Reproductive success is tied closely with Zn and other mineral supplementation. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref6">6</xref>] sought to determine linkages of Prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) to zinc plasma levels. An inverse relationship between plasma Zn levels and PGF2α was observed, and plasma Zn levels were determined to be an indicator for potential abortion routes. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref7">7</xref>] stated that dairy cows consuming grass containing low amounts of Cu, I, and Zn were more prone to reproductive failures. Non-supplemented cows experienced retained placenta and dystocia while cows that were supplemented experienced no reproductive issues.</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref8">8</xref>] observed the microminerals and vitamins in the blood serum of white-tailed deer to establish a baseline for dietary requirements. Does (n = 233) were collected from three separate ranches. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> illustrates the reference data from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref9">9</xref>] used to compare LS means of minerals, vitamins, and cholesterol.</p><p>Using [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref9">9</xref>] reference data, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref8">8</xref>] observed females that failed to conceive on the day of sampling had lower circulating levels of plasma Zn compared to bred does seen below (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). There is evidence towards the lack of zinc hindering the ability of these white-tailed does to become pregnant. Feeding a zinc deficient diet 3 to 5 days or longer prior to breeding has been shown to cause decrease oocyte development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref10">10</xref>] . Additionally, zinc deficiency has been linked to the synthesis and secretion of vital reproductive hormones such as follicle</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Reference data averages [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref9">9</xref>] compared to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref8">8</xref>] study LS Means of serum micromineral and fat-soluble metabolites in sampled does</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Analyte</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Reference Data Average Ranges</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Current LS Mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SE</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Co (ng/mL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unknown</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.194</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu (&#181;g/mL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60 - 1.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe (&#181;g/mL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >152.00 - 277.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >220.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.134</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn (ng/mL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unknown</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.449</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mo (ng/mL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unknown</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.141</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Se (ng/mL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.00 - 150.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >172.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.383</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn (&#181;g/mL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50 - 1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.010</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vitamin A (ng/mL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unknown</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >275.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.421</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vitamin E (&#181;g/mL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unknown</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.055</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cholesterol (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unknown</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.920</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Pregnancy status of does determined by blood test 30 - 37 d following breeding procedure that occurred in conjunction with sampling for micromineral and fat-soluble analyte analysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref8">8</xref>] </title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Analyte</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Open LS Mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Bred LS Mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SEM<sup>a</sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn (&#181;g/mL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42<sup>x</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48<sup>y</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.025</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>a</sup>Pooled Standard Error of the Mean; <sup>xy</sup>Means with varying superscripts vary (α &lt; 0.05).</p><p>stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref11">11</xref>] . If zinc is to be supplemented to aid in reproductive functions for the herd, the chemical pathways, usages, and effects of zinc should be considered.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methodology</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Ethical Statement</title><p>Sam Houston State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) granted exemption (IACUC Approved: 21-01-05-1044-10-01) for Field Studies by SHSU IACUC Form X.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Data Collection</title><sec id="s2_2_1"><title>2.2.1. Axis and Red Deer</title><p>A protocol for an experimental study was developed to extract rumen fluid from deer to conduct in vitro true dry matter digestibility in a DAISY II incubator (Ankom Technology, Macedon, NY, USA), followed by neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) analysis with an ANKOM 200 fiber analyzer (Ankom Technology, Macedon, NY, USA) based on varying levels of zinc added (0.36, 3.6, and 36 g/d equivalents). A local producer notified the researchers in this study that a series of culling events were taking place. As such, researchers only utilized animals available through this production system. A red</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> In vitro True Digestibility, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Acid Detergent Fiber percentages with different levels of zinc sulfate added in Red Hind and Axis Doe</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Species</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Red Hind</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Axis Doe</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trt<sup>a</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NDF (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ADF (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >IVTD (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.91</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>a</sup>Treatment added in the form of ZnSO<sub>4</sub> at g/d equivalents.</p><p>deer hind (Cervuselaphus) and an axis doe (Axis axis) were utilized in this preliminary study. The deer were collected from a local wildlife producer (Bedias, Texas) in conjunction with privately contracted hunts with the producer. Animals were ethically harvested by trained professionals and immediately transported to an onsite abattoir for processing. The entire gastrointestinal track from the beginning of the rumen to the end of the abomasum was collected and sealed via gut string commonly used in meat processing. The entire organ was placed in 39˚C water housed in a large, insulated cooler and transported back to the laboratory at Sam Houston State University. Once at the laboratory, the rumen was opened, fluid was filtered through 4 layers of cheesecloth to separate from large feed particles. The rumen fluid was utilized in the incubator along with filter bags containing the commercial feed the herd was currently consuming. Three treatment groups per deer were made using the rumen fluid collected with 0.36, 3.6, and 36 g/d equivalents of zinc sulfate (ZnSO<sub>4</sub>) added to each respective jar according to beef cattle supplementation guidelines [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref2">2</xref>] . Cattle supplementation guidelines have been seen to be used for exotic cervids. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref12">12</xref>] used cattle supplementation guidelines for copper in red deer. Only one animal from each species was collected and were treated independently, therefore, statistical analysis was not run on this data. The sample size (n = 1) limits the statistical capabilities of this experiment, but as a preliminary trial, it may serve as a proof of concept for subsequent research (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_2"><title>2.2.2. White-Tailed Does</title><p>In this study, rumen fluid from white-tailed does (Odocoileus virginianus) was utilized. Fluid was used in conjunction with the protocol developed in the previous preliminary study. This study utilized deer ethically harvested at Gibbs Ranch in Huntsville, Texas through use of antlerless deer tags supplemented by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Managed Lands Deer Program. At harvest, researchers collected the rumen and transported it to the agricultural science laboratory on the SHSU campus.</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref13">13</xref>] artificial saliva was created and used as a buffer. The buffer solution was mixed on the day of collection. A 1:1 alfalfa to coastal hay blend was used to create a replicable feedstuff mix. All feedstuffs were dried in a drying oven for 24 hours. Feed was ground using a 1mm MF 10 basic Microfine grinder (IKAWerke, Staufen, Germany). There were 10 bags with feed and one correction factor bag per jar with four incubator jars used in this experiment.</p><p>An insulated cooler was used with water at approximately 45˚C. The temperature goal was 39˚C when placing the rumen into the cooler. Therefore, overheating allowed for heat loss while accommodating for transportation time. Once the gastrointestinal tract was removed from the animal, gut string was used to tie the ends of the esophagus and small intestine to prevent leakage. The rumen was then transported back to the research lab.</p><p>In this procedure, the rumen fluid from two does (n = 2) were combined. Two does were used in this study due to the nature of cull deer tags received through permitting through the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. Utilizing fluid from multiple deer allowed for reduced variation between the deer that we were able to collect because combining of the rumen fluid allows for reduced variation between rumen fluid activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref14">14</xref>] . Rumen fluid was filtered and agitated from the feed using multiple layers of cheese cloth. Carbon dioxide was used to maintain an anaerobic environment. The fluid was poured into one of four incubator jars in a DAISY Incubator (Ankom Technology, Macedon, NY, USA). Two jars remained as a control with no zinc sulfate added. The other two jars were administered 0.073 mg/kg/d based on sheep and goat zinc supplementation guides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref3">3</xref>] . Since white-tailed deer were collected in this phase, sheep and goat supplementation guidelines were used instead. The size of the ruminoreticulum relative to their body weight determines the digestive capabilities for the animal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref15">15</xref>] . Thus, white-tailed deer are more similar to sheep and goats than cattle in terms of digestion. White-tailed deer have diets resembling sheep and goats where deer compete against sheep primarily for forbs and compete for browse against goats [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref16">16</xref>] . Thus, white-tailed deer share nutrient sources with sheep and goats closely. The filter bags containing 0.5 g of the hay blend mixture were placed in the incubator jars with the fluid and allowed to incubate for 48 hours. Following fermentation, NDF and ADF procedures were conducted to measure the digestibility of these respective feedstuff constituents. Samples were then ashed to measure remaining organic matter.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Data Analysis</title><p>A paired t-test was utilized in SAS Enterprise v9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used to determine differences in the white-tailed doe data. Data obtained from the exotic cervids was not subjected to statistical analysis due to the lack of power in the experimental design. Each jar was an experimental unit.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Axis and Red Deer</title><p>In vitro true digestibility (IVTD) was noticeably higher compared to other studies. The IVTD for the red hind ranged from 90.74% to 92.60%. The axis doe had a IVTD range of 90.71% to 99.91%. The percentage increase in digestibility may be explained by the sample size, standard error, and that a commercial feed was used. Only one specimen from each species was utilized in this phase. Thus, it is not a strong representation of the population. The standard deviation for IVTD for most groups were greater than 1, illustrating that the feeds in the filter bags were not digested uniformly, and that the ranges for IVTD may be higher numerically due to standard error. However, the commercial feed may have increased IVTD since it contained a prefabricated balanced diet that the deer were consuming prior to the time of harvest. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref17">17</xref>] analyzed crude fiber (CF), ADF, and NDF with commercial beef cattle feeds in vitro. NDF ranged from 30.42% to 33.08%, and ADF ranged from 17.66% to 22.91%. The NDF and ADF ranges found in the beef cattle feeds were lower than the ranges in the deer feed. However, the maximum CF of the deer feed was higher than all the beef cattle feeds. This may have influence on the NDF and ADF values obtained with the deer comparably. This phase of the study exemplified that the methodology will produce viable and functional IVTD results that support rumen microbial digestion.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. White-Tailed Does</title><p>The IVTD was not significantly different (P &gt; 0.05) between the non-zinc supplemented group (control) and the zinc supplemented group. The average dry matter digested is displayed as a percentage of the original sample weight. The control group had an average digested dry matter of 91.87%. The zinc supplemented group displayed an average digested dry matter of 95.13% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF) did not show significant difference (P &gt; 0.05) between the two groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). The control group had a mean of 56.03% NDF and the zinc supplemented group had a mean of 57.11% NDF.</p><p>Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF) did not show any significant difference (P &gt; 0.05) between the two groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The control group had an average of 74.56% ADF and the zinc supplemented group had a mean of 76.90% ADF.</p><p>There was no statistical difference (P &gt; 0.05) in organic matter (OM) between the control group and the zinc supplemented group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). The control group had a mean of 78.51% OM and zinc supplemented group had a mean of 79.38% OM.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The sample size (n = 2) should be noted, future studies with larger sample sizes will illustrate more accurate results with less standard error. A more controlled study with the capabilities of conducting trials with multiple experimental units may further confirm the observations from this study.</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref18">18</xref>] showed no difference in digestibility in bulls when zinc was supplemented. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref19">19</xref>] did not see a change in digestibility of DM, NDF and ADF with zinc sulfate supplementation. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref20">20</xref>] observed a digested NDF range for roughage products from 47% to 61% in a daisy incubator which this range aligns with the amounts of digested NDF components observed in this study. The data for ADF was</p><p>non-significant (P &gt; 0.05) as well, showing marginal differences if any in digested ADF components. No differences in digested components may be due to the zinc requirements of the microbes being met by the basal diet supplied [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref19">19</xref>] . In contrast, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref21">21</xref>] observed an increased average daily gain (ADG) in goats when supplementing with zinc sulfate. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref22">22</xref>] produced an average DMD of organic matter (OM) of about 55% using sheep rumen fluid in vitro. The feedstuffs used were mainly alfalfa hay and corn silage. However, the digested organic matters for both groups were approximately 79% and highlighting that the white-tailed deer exhibited a higher digestibility of organic matter comparably.</p><p>The 1:1 alfalfa and coastal hay blend proved to be beneficial for experimental purposes. However, this is not a natural diet for wild deer, and the variety of browse, forbs, and grass with varying consumption amounts could prove difficult to recreate. Changes in diet cause alterations in the substrates available to the microbes for fermentation, and this will ultimately cause changes in structure and function of the microbial community [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref23">23</xref>] . While this feed blend provides a standard that could be potentially replicated, it may be more applicable to captive operations. This experiment may have better applications to captive deer being fed strictly commercial diets. This would allow researchers to know the complete diet of the deer prior to experimental use, and this could be used to mimic the substrates that are entering the rumen more precisely. Thus, replicating the functionality of the rumen for captive deer more closely than wild deer.</p><p>Additionally, monitoring the pH levels could prove beneficial for data analysis as well. The pH was not monitored for the duration of this experiment. While there were no indications of human error in preparing the buffer solution, it is not guaranteed that the pH was maintained. Observing pH during the incubation may prove beneficial in data analysis, for it could be used as an additional reference to gauge microbial activities.</p><p>Future studies may include the usage of different zinc compounds. The bioavailability of zinc compounds differs based on the type of source. Organic forms such as zinc methionine and zinc proteinate have illustrated to improve the digestibility of OM and ADF more effectively than Zn-sulfate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref24">24</xref>] . Thus, exploring the effects of different zinc compounds may assist in improving in vitro digestibility.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>Phase 1 of the experiment using the exotic deer illustrated to be both viable and functional for the usage of rumen fluid in deer for IVTD experimentation. Additionally, adequate NDF and ADF ranges were obtained when compared to similar studies. Although the exotic deer data holds no statical leverage, it served as a proof of concept for trials with white-tailed does. Phase 2 with white-tailed deer saw no differences in any parameters tested.</p><p>While not observed in this study, previous literature outlined in this paper shows digestibility can be increased with an optimal amount of zinc supplementation. However, these patterns need to be confirmed in vivo as well. There is a financial benefit to increasing digestibility of feedstuffs amongst the herd for an operation. The herd can utilize more nutrients from the feed, and potentially see improvements in terms of microbial functions, ADG, and conception rates (mentioned previously). Increasing conception rates allows fewer expenses to be wasted on females that are not producing offspring. In turn, the producer receives more revenue in the long run by producing more fawns that can be sold in the future. Overall, this can mitigate costs associated with feed and breeding to increase profitability for the producer. This could also potentiate formal nutritional guidelines for cervids to be created and standardized which would allow for better management practices in the deer industry. Standardized guidelines for cervid nutrition would ultimately benefit the producer by feeding deer more efficiently than the industry is now. If properly managed and supported, the captive deer industry can begin seeing improvements in production. The deer industry supplies almost 17,000 jobs to the state of Texas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133280-ref1">1</xref>] . This contributes a substantial amount of funds to the Texas economy, exemplifying that the deer industry is a major economic entity that needs proper support. Nutritional guidelines for cervids can be created to begin assisting the further development of the deer industry.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>R.J.T. provided the text for this document. P.M.U. provided project oversight and revisions for publication. M.M.B. and S.F.K. provided revisions for publication and provided equal contributions with P.M.U in project design. I.C.D. provided formatting edits for this document. Animals for this study were donated by C.R.S. and 3-S Texas Outdoors. The authors certify there is no conflict of interest present in the conducting of this study.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Thibodoeax, R.J., Urso, P.M., Kelley, S.F., Beverly, M.M., Stewart, C.R. and Dunn, I.C. (2024) The Effects of Zinc Sulfate on the in Vitro Digestibility of Feeds in Cervids. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 14, 157-167. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2024.143011</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.133280-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Outlaw, J., Earle, M., Anderson, D. and Richardson, J. (2017) Economic Impact of the Texas Deer Breeding and Hunting Operations.&lt;br&gt;https://texasdeerassociation.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Economic-Impact-Texas-Deer-Breeding-and-Hunting-Operations.pdf </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133280-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (2016) Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 8th Edition, The National Academies Press, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133280-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">National Research Council (2007) Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants: Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and New World Camelids. The National Academies Press, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133280-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bartoskewitz, M.L., Hewitt, D.G., Laurenz, J.C., Pitts, J.S. and Bryant, F.C. (2007) Effect of Dietary Copper and Zinc Concentrations on White-Tailed Deer Antler Growth, Body Size, and Immune System Function. &lt;i&gt;Small&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Ruminant&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Research&lt;/i&gt;, 73, 87-94. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.11.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133280-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gressley, T. (2009) Zinc, Copper, Manganese, and Selenium in Dairy Cattle Rations. &lt;i&gt;Proceedings&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;of&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;the&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;7&lt;i&gt;th&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Annual&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Mid&lt;/i&gt;-&lt;i&gt;Atlantic&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Nutrition&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Conference&lt;/i&gt;, College Park, MD, 20742.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133280-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Graham, T.W., Giri, S.N., Daels, P.F., Cullor, J.S., Keen, C.L., Thurmond, M.C., Dellinger, J.D., Stabenfeldt, G.H. and Osburn, B.I. (1995) Associations among Prostaglandin F2Alpha, Plasma Zinc, Copper and Iron Concentrations and Fetal Loss in Cows and Mares. &lt;i&gt;Theriogenology&lt;/i&gt;, 44, 379-390. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(95)00192-B</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133280-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Molefe, K. and Mwanza, M. (2020) Effects of Mineral Supplementation on Reproductive Performance of Pregnant Cross-Breed Bonsmara Cows: An Experimental Study. &lt;i&gt;Reproduction&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;in&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Domestic&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Animals&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;55, 301-308. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13618</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133280-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Greenwood, M., Kelley, S.F., Urso, P., Anderson, M.J. and Beverly, M.M. (2021) Determination of Blood Micromineral and Fat-Soluble Vitamin Values for White-Tailed Deer. M.D. Thesis, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab096.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133280-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Puls, R. (1994) Mineral Levels in Animal Health: Diagnostic Data. 2nd Edition, Sherpa International, Clearbrook.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133280-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tian, X. and Diaz, F.J. (2013) Acute Dietary Zinc Deficiency before Conception Compromises Oocyte Epigenetic Programming and Disrupts Embryonic Development. &lt;i&gt;Developmental&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Biology&lt;/i&gt;, 376, 51-61. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.01.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133280-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nasiadek, M., Stagierowicz, J., Klimczak, M. and Kilanowicz, A. (2020) The Role of Zinc in Selected Female Reproductive System Disorders. &lt;i&gt;Nutrients&lt;/i&gt;, 12, Article No. 2464. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12082464</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133280-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Serrano, M.P., Maggiolino, A., Lorenzo, J.M., De Palo, P., Garc&amp;#237;a, A. and Landete-Castillejos, T. (2019) Meat Quality of Farmed Red Deer Fed a Balanced Diet: Effects of Supplementation with Copper Bolus on Different Muscles. &lt;i&gt;Animal&lt;/i&gt;, 13, 888-896. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118002173</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133280-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McDougall, E.I. (1948) Studies on Ruminant Saliva. 1. The Composition and Output of Sheep&amp;#8217;s Saliva. &lt;i&gt;Biochemical&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Journal&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;43, 99-109. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0430099&lt;br&gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1274641/ </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133280-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cone, J.W., Gelder, A.H., Visscher, G.J.W. and Oudshoorn, L. (1996) Influence of Rumen Fluid and Substrate Concentration on Fermentation Kinetics Measured with a Fully Automated Time Related Gas Production Apparatus. &lt;i&gt;Animal&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Feed&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Science&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Technol&lt;/i&gt;ogy, 61, 113-128. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(96)00950-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133280-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Henke, S., Demarais, S. and Phister, J. (1988) Digestive Capacity and Diets of White-Tailed Deer and Exotic Ruminants. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Wildlife Management&lt;/i&gt;, 52, 595-598. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.2307/3800913</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133280-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McMahan, C.A. (1964) Food Habits of Deer and Three Classes of Livestock.&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;The&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Journal&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;of&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Wildlife&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Management&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;28, 798-808. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.2307/3798797</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133280-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kamal, M.T., Hashem, M.A., Al-Mamun, M., Hossain, M.M., Razzaque, M.A. and Ritu, J.H. (2020) Investigating the Quality of Commercial Beef Cattle Feeds and Feed Ingredients Used in Bangladesh. &lt;i&gt;SAARC Journal of Agriculture&lt;/i&gt;, 18, 197-208. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3329/sja.v18i1.48393</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133280-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mandal, G.P., Dass, R.S., Isore, D.P., Garg, A.K. and Ram, G.C. (2007) Effect of Zinc Supplementation from Two Sources on Growth, Nutrient Utilization and Immune Response in Male Crossbred Cattle (&lt;i&gt;Bos&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;indicus&lt;/i&gt; &amp;#215; &lt;i&gt;Bos taurus&lt;/i&gt;) Bulls. &lt;i&gt;Animal&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Feed&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Science&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Technology&lt;/i&gt;, 138, 1-12. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.09.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133280-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jia, W., Jia, Z., Zhang, W., Wang, R., Zhang, S. and Zhu, X. (2008) Effects of Dietary Zinc on Performance, Nutrient Digestibility and Plasma Zinc Status in Cashmere Goats. &lt;i&gt;Small Ruminant Research&lt;/i&gt;, 80, 68-72. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2008.09.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133280-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mabjeesh, S.J., Cohen, M. and Arieli, A. (2000) &lt;i&gt;In Vitro&lt;/i&gt; Methods for Measuring the Dry Matter Digestibility of Ruminant Feedstuffs: Comparison of Methods and Inoculum Source.&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Journal&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;of&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Dairy&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Science&lt;/i&gt;, 83, 2289-2294. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75115-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133280-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jia, W., Zhu, X., Zhang, W., Cheng, J., Guo, C. and Jia, Z. (2009) Effects of Source of Supplemental Zinc on Performance, Nutrient Digestibility and Plasma Mineral Profile in Cashmere Goats. &lt;i&gt;Asian&lt;/i&gt;-&lt;i&gt;Australian Journal of Animal Sciences&lt;/i&gt;, 22, 1648-1653. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.80649</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133280-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anassori, E., Dalir-Naghadeh, B., Pirmohammadi, R., Taghizadeh, A., Asri-Rezaei, S., Farahmand-Azar, S., Besharati, M. and Tahmoozi, M. (2012) &lt;i&gt;In Vitro&lt;/i&gt; Assessment of the Digestibility of Forage Based Sheep Diet, Supplemented with Raw Garlic, Garlic Oil and Monensin. &lt;i&gt;Veterinary Research Forum&lt;/i&gt;, 3, 5-11.&lt;br&gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4312812/ </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133280-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Petri, R.M., Schwaiger, T., Penner, G.B., Beauchemin, K.A., Forster, R.J., McKinnon, J.J. and McAllister, T.A. (2013) Changes in the Rumen Epimural Bacterial Diversity of Beef Cattle as Affected by Diet and Induced Ruminal Acidosis. &lt;i&gt;Applied&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Environmental&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Microbiology&lt;/i&gt;, 79, 3744-3755. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03983-12</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133280-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alimohamady, R., Aliarabi, H., Bruckmaier, R.M. and Christensen, R.G. (2018) Effect of Different Sources of Supplemental Zinc on Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities in Lambs. &lt;i&gt;Biological Trace Element R&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;e&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;search&lt;/i&gt;, 189, 75-84. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-018-1448-1</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>