The craniovertebral junction defined as the occiput, atlas (C1) and axis (C2) is a complex area that houses vital neural and vascular structures while achieving the most mobility of any segment within the spine [1] [2] . This craniovertebral junction is the most mobile and most stable region of the spine; the center of stability is C0-C1 joint, whereas the center of mobility is C1C2 joint [3] . Being a highly mobile functional unit at the junction of the skull and vertebral column, traumatic events in this area may produce devastating neurological complication and death [4] . Dislocations are more prone to compromise the integrity of the craniovertebral junction and lead to compression of vital structures through the foramen magnum resulting in lethal evolution. In case of instability without dislocation, patients are usually asymptomatic on admission. Therefore, craniovertebral junction trauma obeyed to the all-or-none law. However surgical complications are potentially lethal [1] . C1C2 wiring is among the pioneering technic reported by Mixter and Osgood in 1909 and by Gallie in 1939 using heavy stilk thread and steel respectively [5] . Since then, further technics using, clamps, screw and rod have been described and popularized, relegating wiring technic to the background so far. The most revolutionary and first instrumentation in modern neurosurgery was described by Goel et al. in 1994, using plate and screw method of fixation of the lateral mass of the atlas and the axis [6] , and modified by Harms in 2021 using polyaxial screw and rod [5] . In Burkina Faso, instrumentation device above all screw and plate for Goel technic is still unavailable and expensive to afford it from abroad. Far from the all-or-none law; a patient with quadriplegia and neurovegetative disorders has been properly managed in our department through C1C2 wiring technic for posttraumatic C1C2 dislocation. A second one with quadriplegia ordered Screws and rod from abroad, and a Goel-Harms screwing achieved a rapid improvement from quadriplegia to an asymptomatic condition. Other patients with less serious condition received surgical or conservative treatment with good outcomes too. We report our short series of 7 patients.

This is a retrospective study about patients suffering from posttraumatic atlantoaxial dislocation, with or without associated C1 or odontoid fracture. Database was collected from January 2019 to April 2024 among patients admitted at the department of neurosurgery at the Military Hospital Capitaine Halassane Coulibaly and at the University Hospital Souro Sanou. Where included, patients operated or managed conservatively by the same surgeon, with at least 6 Months follow-up either post-operatively or after conservative treatment as well as the availability of medical records. Surgical or conservative management were based on symptoms, radiological findings, elapsed time from trauma to admission, patient’s financial condition and the decision of the patient after preoperative counseling.

There were 6 men and a woman with an average age of 33-year-old (Range from 22 to 40 years). Rollover motor vehicle accident in unrestrained driver in 2 cases and passenger in one case was reported, whereas 3 cases were motorcycle accidents and finally a fall of a heavy load on the head in one case. On admission, patients were suffering from cervicalgia in 3 cases, brachial monoplegia in two patients, isolated quadriplegia in two patients and quadriplegia with respiratory distress associated to neurovegetative disorders in one patient. Cervical computed tomography (CT) scan revealed associated fracture of odontoid in four cases; fracture of anterior arch of C1 in one case and transvers ligament rupture without any fracture in two cases. In one of these latter cases a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a large upper spinal cord contusion with edema toward medulla oblongata in one case. C1C2 wiring was achieved in 2 patients, Goel-Harms screwing in one case, and conservative treatment was decided in 2 patients, whereas 2 patients with indication for surgical treatment refused surgery and were managed conservatively. A patient who refused surgery was lost to follow up after favorable outcome. Another with brachial monoplegia showed a partial improvement. The others five patients showed complete recovery (Table 1). Surgical or conservative management were based on symptoms, radiological findings, elapsed time from trauma to admission, patient’s financial condition and the decision of the patient after preoperative counseling.

We give a detailed description of our case1, case 2 and case 7. The others are summarized on Table 1.

Upper cervical spine injury is rare and result from high velocity trauma leading commonly to devastating complication [7] . In an autopsy series, 24.4% of patients whose death was attributable to traffic accidents had radiological lesions of upper cervical spine [8] [9] . Among all spinal injuries, atlantoaxial dislocation accounts for less than 1% [10] [11] [12] . This dislocation without fracture of the dens (odontoid process) is even more rare [10] . In our series, only two patients (Case 1 and 7) did not find bone fracture associated to atlantoaxial dislocation. The diagnosis of atlantoaxial dislocation can be defined on X-ray with the measurement of atlantodental interval. This distance is constant during head movement and should not exceed 3 mm in adult and 5 mm for children [13] [14] [15] [16] . In our case 1, this distance was 3.9 mm on admission CT scan and the condition of the patient impaired the day after. Thus, an MRI was realized and revealed an increased atlantodentral interval to 5 mm associated with spinal cord contusion despite a strict immobilization of the patient with hard cervical collar without an attempt of close reduction. For a better management of these atlantoaxial dislocations, several classifications were done and the more popular were Greenberg classification in 1968 as Well as Fielding and Hawkins classification; separating atlantoaxial dislocation in 2 subgroups (reducible and irreducible) and 4 subgroups (Anterior, posterior, lateral, rotatory) respectively [13] [16] [17] . The lack of therapeutic application of these latter classifications resulted in a new classification drew by Wang (Table 2). According to this classification, we achieved the reduction in our patients (case 1 and 7) with skeletal traction under general anesthesia, which was consistence with Wang’s type II. Thus, a posterior stabilization was decided. Historically considered as a nobody’s land, craniovertebral junction surgery or specialty recently gained high consideration as symbol of challenging surgery as well as selective top level qualifying surgery [18] . Over century, steady advances have been made in fixating unstable atlantoaxial complex. Current options for fixation of atlantoaxial complex including posterior

clamps, posterior wiring technics, C1 and C2 transarticular screw fixation, posterior C1 lateral mass screw with C2 pars or pedicle screw fixation, and anterior transoral C1 lateral mass to C2 vertebral body fixation [5] . As mentioned before, our case 1 and 7 was Wang’s grade II and therefore, was consistence with posterior fixation. Unfortunately, device for screw-rod construction or other materials were unavailable, thus C1C2 wiring using steel wire was achieved according to Gallie’s technic for case 1. This steel wire was cheaper for a cost about 3 to 4 dollars and a single wire was enough for this technic, in opposite to devices for Goel-Harms technique which have been ordered abroad for 1000 dollars. Although wiring technic was found to ensure a poor rotational stability with pseudoathrosis when odontoid fracture is associated, and requires the need of postoperative external hard cervical collar [19] , it allowed an appropriated immobilization of the dislocation after skeletal reduction in our case 1. This was testified with a postoperative control CT scan showing an atlantodental interval within normal range and the good post operative outcome. However, Goel et al. reported 100% of union and stability in 1994 with his technique, without an occurrence of surgical adverse events [6] . We achieved a proper reduction in case 7 using C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screwing with rod, despite a huge preoperative dislocation. This screwing technique is very effective despite its expensiveness in our environment. Moreover, wiring is the alternative to lateral mass screw implants in patients with abnormal courses of the vertebral artery (15% - 20% of people), in osteopenic spines where screws may not hold, in scoliotic spines and in case of lateral mass asymmetry (Our Case 2) [20] . Wiring technic also shows a great importance in pediatric patients as well as in posttraumatic condition than in congenital instability of craniovertebral junction such as Morquio’s or Down’s syndrome [20] . In fact, craniovertebral region reaches adult size and configuration at approximatively 8 to 10 years of age, thus some authors support that lateral mass screw implants below this age can exert significant grow limitation [21] [22] [23] . In addition, some studies revealed the same 100% rate of fusion for both lateral mass screw implant and sublaminar instrumented wiring [24] [25] . However, in pediatric patients, complications such as 30% of screw pulling out in suboccipital area, 10.4% of other complications rate including vertebral artery injuries and mortality rate of up to 9% after complex spine decompression and fixation should be taken into consideration [20] [26] [27] [28] [29] . Abboud et al. reported worse Frankel grade (A or B) and neurovegetative disorders at presentation to be strongly statistically correlated with poor prognosis factor and higher mortality in 102 cases of cervical spine trauma over a study period of 11 years [4] [10] [30] . Despite the existence of those both latter factors in one of our patients (Case 1), his condition improved dramatically, moving from ASIA A with neurovegetative disorders preoperatively, to ASIA E postoperatively without any symptoms.

Atlantoaxial dislocation is a life-threatening condition with high mortality before surgery as well as postoperatively. Despite great progresses either in surgical technic or instrumentation devices, this surgery remains challenging and so gratifying so far, when a good postoperative outcome is achieved such in our described case 1 and 7. A lack of clamps, screw rod and other sophisticated devices in some developing countries, can be balanced with wiring technic using steel wire which is cheaper and available almost everywhere. Although it requires a more accurate preoperative neurosurgical setting, the screwing technique takes less time and is characterized by less blood loss and less postoperative discomfort than the wiring technique. However, the latter confirms the simplicity, safety (continuous fluoroscopic assistance is not necessary, and there is no risk of neurovascular injuries) and lower expense (neither complex hardware devices nor neuronavigation systems are required) than the screwing technique [31] [32] . When fever and neurovegetative disorders are seen at presentation, after ruling out an infectious disease, early reduction and immobilization may save the life of the patient as reported in our Case 1. However, an attempt should be made for the availability of atlantoaxial instrumentation devices above all the screw and plate use in Goel technic, which should be not beyond the financial possibility of the majority of the population.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Dao, I., Visocchi, M., Sow, S., Jabang, J., Ouattara, O., Somda, A., Sanou, A., Nassoum, E.D., Tossou, A., Ouedraogo, N., Bako, F., Soulama, M., Diallo, M. and Dakouré, P.W.H. (2024) C1C2 Wiring and Posttraumatic Atlantoaxial Dislocation: An Effective and Cheap Surgical Procedure in a Developing Country. Surgical Science, 15, 357-370. https://doi.org/10.4236/ss.2024.155033