<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2024.155023</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-133216</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Genetic Diversity of Jute Mallow (&lt;i&gt;Corchorus spp&lt;/i&gt;.) Accessions Based on ISSR Markers
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Munguatosha</surname><given-names>Ngomuo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tsvetelina</surname><given-names>Stoilova</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tileye</surname><given-names>Feyissa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Patrick</surname><given-names>A. Ndakidemi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>AVRDC&amp;amp;#8212;World Vegetable Centre, Arusha, Tanzania</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>School of Life Sciences, Nelson Mandela African Institute of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>05</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>316</fpage><lpage>328</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>27,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2024</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>18,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>21,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Jute mallow is a nutritious leafy vegetable. The leaves are rich in proteins, vitamins and essential amino acids. Molecular characterization of Jute mallow with focus on improvement of leaf yield is scarcely reported. In the present study, inter sequence simple repeats (ISSR) molecular markers were employed to assess genetic diversity and relationships of 83 accessions of Jute mallow from different parts of Africa and Asia conserved at the World Vegetable Center East and Southern Africa. A total of 89 bands were amplified by 8 ISSR primers. Number of polymorphic bands per primer ranged from 2 to 6 with an average of 2.75 bands per primer. Polymorphic information content (PIC) values ranged from 0.390 to 0.760 with average of 0.53. Average Nei&amp;#8217;s gene diversity (&lt;i&gt;h&lt;/i&gt;) and Shannon&amp;#8217;s information index (&lt;i&gt;I&lt;/i&gt;) were 0.335 and 0.494 respectively. The highest pairwise genetic distance was 0.431 observed in a population from East Africa accessions. PC1 and PC2 axis explained 21.69% and 11.66% of the total variation respectively. UPGMA cluster analysis grouped the accessions into six main clusters at genetic similarity coefficient of 0.53 as standard value for classification. These results have important implications for jute mallow breeding and conservation.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Corchorus spp&lt;/i&gt;.</kwd><kwd> Genetic Diversity</kwd><kwd> ISSRs</kwd><kwd> Jute Mallow</kwd><kwd> Leafy Vegetable</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Jute mallow (Corchorus spp.) is a traditional leaf vegetable that is used in many households in Africa, Middle East and Latin America as both vegetable and medicinal plant. It is an annual herb belonging to a family Malvaceae which is comprised of 50 - 60 species which are distributed in the tropics, subtropics and warm temperate regions of the world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref3">3</xref>] . The leaves are well known as emollient, diuretic, tonic and purifying body [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref5">5</xref>] . The leaves contain on average 85 - 87 g H<sub>2</sub>0, 5.6 g protein, 0.7 g oil, 5 g carbohydrate, 1.5 g fiber, 250 - 266 mg Ca, 4.8 mg Fe, 1.5 mg vitamin A, 0.1 mg thiamine, 0.3 mg riboflavin, 1.5 mg nicotinamide and 53 - 100 mg ascorbic acid per 100 g [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref6">6</xref>] . It also contains high amount of all essential amino acids and antioxidants needed for a good health [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref9">9</xref>] . Merha green and Merha red are the genotypes of jute mallow with high nutrional content, they are rich in β-carotene content, 125.4 and 127.5 μg∙g<sup>−1</sup> respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref10">10</xref>] . Most of jute mallow genotypes have reasonable leaf yield, the accession with notable high leaf yield is TOT 7866 from Taiwan region [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Though jute mallow has significant contribution to food security; its cultivation in many parts of Africa is very limited. The crop grows as volunteer crop in farmer’s fields and the leaves are collected during rainfall season and dried and stored for use during dry seasons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref11">11</xref>] . Jute mallow is still classified as neglected and underutilized crop; it is neglected by researchers and national agricultural development policies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref13">13</xref>] . Thus, there are few improved varieties of jute mallow in Africa and those which are grown by farmers are locally obtained from germplasm maintained by farmers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>In order to promote the use of jute mallow, it is crucial to make availability of improved genotypes a priority. To achieve this goal, the information on the genetic diversity of the available germplasm is very important [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>Morphological data coupled with the use of appropriate molecular markers are more reliable and informative of genetic diversity of any species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref16">16</xref>] . Moreover, molecular markers are not affected by environment and they have been used successfully in different plant species for genetic characterization of germplasm at different levels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref17">17</xref>] .</p><p>The use of molecular markers to study genetic diversity of jute has been reported by several authors. Recently, various molecular markers such as random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref16">16</xref>] , simple sequence repeats (SSR) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref22">22</xref>] , amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref12">12</xref>] , sequence-related amplified polymorphisms (SRAP) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref25">25</xref>] and sequence tagged microsatellite sites (STMS) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref26">26</xref>] have been used to detect genetic diversity in different germplasms of jute mallow. Most of these studies focused on jute mallow as a fiber crop and the major emphasis were on improvement of fiber related traits. The results of these studies indicated high diversity between the species but low diversity within the species. Only few studies have been conducted with focus on jute mallow as vegetable with emphasis on improvement of leaf yield. Also in many studies conducted, the materials used were from Asia where jute mallow is grown for fiber. Collections from East, West and Southern Africa largely remain unexploited for genetic diversity particularly with traits related to leaf yield which is the main use of the crop in Africa.</p><p>ISSR markers are significant molecular markers possessing different genome coverage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref27">27</xref>] . ISSR use microsatellite sequences as primers to amplify genomic regions flanked by microsatellite repeats [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref16">16</xref>] . ISSR markers are simple and cost effective to use with high degree of reproducibility [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref28">28</xref>] .</p><p>In view of the above, the present study was conducted to assess genetic diversity of accessions of Jute mallow present in the World Vegetable Center by using ISSR markers.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Plant Materials</title><p>Seeds of 83 accessions of Jute mallow were sown in plastic trays and after 30 days leaf samples were collected from the seedlings for DNA extraction. The Jute mallow collection represent one of the different types of traditional vegetables collected from farmers’ fields and preserved exsitu for breeding, other research activities and farmers purposes. The list of these accessions is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> List of Corchorus spp. accessions used in the molecular characterization</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >SN</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Accession Name</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Country/Area of Origin</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SN</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Accession Name</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Country/Area of Origin</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ALV MN 059</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unknown</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 4413</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AZIGA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cameroon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 4429</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BAFIA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cameroon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 4500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CAM EX CO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cameroon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 4519</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CAM MULA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cameroon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 4541</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tanzania</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 4623</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EX CHAMALAWI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malawi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 4624</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EX ZIMBABWE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zimbabwe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 4669</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GKK 10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malawi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 4701</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GKK 25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malawi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SUD - 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sudan</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tanzania</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 4712</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >IP-10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kenya</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 4713</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >IP-13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kenya</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 4721</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >IP-2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kenya</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 4800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vietnam</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >IP-5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kenya</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 4876</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Japan</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >IP-4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kenya</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 4885</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Japan</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MIX</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tanzania</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 5876</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Japan</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ML-JM-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malawi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 5877</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Japan</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ML-JM-10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malawi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 5999</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Taiwan region</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ML-JM-12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malawi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 6278</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vietnam</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ML-JM-13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malawi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 6370</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unknown</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ML-JM-14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malawi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 6425</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uganda</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ML-JM-2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malawi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 6426</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kenya</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ML-JM-3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malawi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 6427</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kenya</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ML-JM-4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malawi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 6430</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cameroon</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SUD 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sudan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 6667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Philippines</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SUD 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sudan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 6669</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Philippines</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SUD 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sudan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 6730</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unknown</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T0T 4067</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vietnam</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 6749</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unknown</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 0124</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malaysia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 7865</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unknown</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 3499</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vietnam</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 7866</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unknown</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 4064</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vietnam</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 7974</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 4097</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tanzania</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 7977</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 4140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vietnam</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 7979</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KIPUMBULIKO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unknown</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 7980</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 4157</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vietnam</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 8532</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unknown</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 4235</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 9736</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unknown</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 4312</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >UG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uganda</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 4316</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TZA 3002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tanzania</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOT 4352</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TZA 3070</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tanzania</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TZA 681</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tanzania</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >UG-JM-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uganda</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >UG-JM-13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uganda</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Molecular Analysis</title><p>DNA extraction was done by using modified Cetyltrimethly ammonium bromide (CTAB) method according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref29">29</xref>] . The DNA was purified by RNase treatment followed by Sodium acetate and ethanol. The quality and concentration of DNA was checked on 0.8% agarose gel by comparing with 100 kb ladder. Fifteen ISSR primers namely (GA)<sub>6</sub>GG, (CAC)<sub>3</sub>, (GAG)<sub>3</sub>GC, CAC(TCC)<sub>5</sub>, TGTA(CA)<sub>7</sub>, TAC(CA)<sub>7</sub>, (AG)<sub>8</sub>T, CGTC(AC)<sub>7</sub> and (AG)<sub>8</sub>CT. Others include (CAG)<sub>6,</sub> (CAG)<sub>10</sub>, (CGG)<sub>6</sub>, (CTT)<sub>6</sub>, (TTG)<sub>10</sub> and GATA were used in this study.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. PCR and Electrophoresis of PCR Products</title><p>After initial screening of the 15 ISSR primers, 8 primers with good and clear banding pattern were used for analysis of genetic diversity (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The PCR was performed in a 10 &#181;l reaction mixture as follows. A 2 &#181;l of 50 ng DNA template was used, 2 &#181;l of primer (Inqaba Biotech, South Africa), 0.5 &#181;l of dNTPs, 2.5 &#181;l of 10&#215; one taq standard buffer, 0.93 &#181;l of nuclease free water. The reaction mixture was loaded in a 96 well plate initially denatured at 94˚C for 5 min;</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> ISSR primers used in this study and their amplification results</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Primer Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Repeat Motif</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of polymorphic Bands</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of amplified Bands</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PIC</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ISSR 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(GA)<sub>6</sub>GG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ISSR 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(CAG)<sub>3</sub>GC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ISSR 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(GAC)TCC5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ISSR 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(AG)<sub>8</sub>G</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.586</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ISSR 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(GATA)<sub>8</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.493</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ISSR 11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(AG)<sub>8</sub>T</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ISSR 14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TGTA(CA)<sub>7</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.494</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ISSR 15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(CTT)<sub>6</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.567</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average Per primer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>followed by 35 cycles of 94˚C for 1 min. Annealing temperature was according to primer for 1 min and 72˚C for 1 min followed by final extension at 72˚C for 5 min. The amplified products were separated on 1.5% agarose gels stained with EZ-Vision (Amresco, fountain parkway solon OH USA) in 0.5 TBE (Tris Borate Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) buffer. 100 base pair ladder was loaded with the samples. The gels were viewed in a Biorad Gel Doc EZ imager</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Data Analysis</title><p>ISSR amplified bands in the gel were manually scored as present (1) or absent (0). Only the consistently and clear bands were scored and used to create 1/0 matrix. This matrix was then used to assess the genetic diversity of Corchorus spp. accessions. Polymorphism information content was calculated for each band according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref30">30</xref>] by using the formula;</p><p>PIC = 1 − ∑ ​ ( Pi ) 2</p><p>where Pi is the frequency of the i<sup>th</sup> band phenotype detected. Nei’s pairwise genetic distance, Nei’s gene diversity and Shannon’s information index (I) were calculated using computer program POPGENE version 1.32 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref31">31</xref>] . The obtained matrix was also used to calculate principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) by using PAST software version 1.93 and to perform cluster analysis and construct the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic average (UPGMA) dendrogram using NTsys - pc 2.1 software.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. ISSR Polymorphism</title><p>Of the 15 primers used 8 primers showed good and clear banding pattern. The number of polymorphic bands per primer ranged from 2 to 6 with an average of 2.75 bands per primer. Regarding the average number of bands amplified, 11.13 bands were amplified per primer and a total of 89 bands for all primers. Total number of bands amplified per primer ranged from 5 - 18 bands. Polymorphic information content (PIC) values ranged from 0.390 in primer (CAG)<sub>3</sub>GC to 0.760 in primer (GAC) TCC5. The primer sets with PIC value &gt; 0.5, were classified as highly informative. Three primers, (GAC) TCC5, (AG)<sub>8</sub>G and (CTT)<sub>6</sub> were highly informative (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Genetic Diversity</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows Nei’s gene diversity (h) and Shannon’s information index (I) for seven populations from different parts of the world. The Nei’s gene diversity ranged from 0.164 in population 1 from East Africa to 0.417 in population 2 from East Asia with an average of 0.335 across all populations. Thus diversity between the populations is low. Similarly Shannon’s information index ranged from 0.245 in population 1 from East Africa to 0.605 in population 2, from East Asia with average of 0.494 across all the populations.</p><p>Nei’s measure of original genetic distance is summarized and presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. The highest pairwise genetic distance (0.431) was observed between</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Nei’s gene diversity and Shannon’s information index for different populations of Corchorus spp. Population 1—East Africa, 2—East Asia, 3—North Africa, 4—South Africa, 5—South East Asia, 6—Unknown, 7—West Africa</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Population</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of Individuals</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nei’s gene diversity (h)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Shannon’s information index (I)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1636</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2447</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4167</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6045</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3403</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4977</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3949</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5769</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3278</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4966</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2936</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4490</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4089</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5877</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Neis’ measure of original genetic distance in Corchorus spp. Populations 1 - 7 are as listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Populations</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >3</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >7</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >****</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1908</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >****</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2685</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1135</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >****</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2180</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0216</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1264</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >****</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2812</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0445</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1517</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0223</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >****</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4308</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0671</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1760</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0557</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0368</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >****</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2638</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0554</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1423</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0486</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0775</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0701</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >****</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>population 1 from East Africa and population 6 from unknown. The lowest pairwise genetic distance 0.0216 was recorded between population 2 from East Asia and population 4 from South Africa. Population from East Africa had a highest pairwise genetic distance as compared with other populations, this was also observed in population from North Africa. Other populations with lowest pairwise genetic distance (0.0223) was between population 4 from South Africa and population 5 from South East Asia.</p><p>Principal coordinate analysis results from the SSR markers for the 83 accessions are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. PC1 and PC2 axis explained 21.69% and 11.66 % of total variation respectively. Accessions from East Africa were grouped in the right side of both positive and negative Y-axis in the first quadrant and fourth quadrant. Also accessions from East Asia and South East Asia were grouped with accessions from East Africa. The second quadrant contained mixed accessions but mainly from East and South East Asia. The unknown accessions were mainly found in second quadrant and third quadrant. The highly different accessions in their clustering pattern were four accessions from East Asia which clustered far from the rest in each quadrant. Two accessions from West Africa also clustered separately in the third quadrant as well as South African accessions in the fourth and second quadrant.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Cluster Analysis</title><p>UPGMA tree showed six main clusters at genetic similarity coefficient of 0.53 as standard value for classification within the collection of 83 accessions from this germplasm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). The first cluster contained 5 accessions, three from Asia and one from South Africa and the remaining from unknown. The second cluster</p><p>contained 10 accessions, six from East Africa, and three from South Africa and one from East Asia. Cluster three contained 24 accessions, 8 accessions from unknown origin were grouped in this cluster. Four (4) accessions from North Africa and six from East and South Africa as well as six accessions from East Asia were found in this cluster. Cluster four was formed by 26 accessions mainly from East and South East Asia (24 accessions). The remaining two accessions were from East and South Africa. The accessions from West Africa were grouped in cluster five and one accession from South Africa. Cluster six contained 13 accessions mainly from East and Southern Africa; only one accession was from East Asia.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Assessment of genetic diversity within cultivated crops has important implications in breeding for improvement and conservation of genetic resources. Molecular markers can be employed as a tool to reveal the diversity within crop species. In this study ISSR markers were used to assess the diversity of 83 accessions of indigenous vegetable Jute mallow.</p><p>In our study, number of polymorphic bands ranged from 2 - 6 with an average of 2.75 bands per primer. The number of bands amplified ranged from 5 to 18 bands. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref15">15</xref>] reported a relatively high range of amplified fragments which ranged from 12 to 21 by using four ISSR primers of Jute mallow. High PIC values in our study clearly indicated usefulness and applicability of the markers used in establishing the diversity within the studied accessions. A PIC value of 0.34 from primer (CCT)<sub>6</sub> is reported as highest when polymorphism was considered across all species by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref15">15</xref>] . This is contrary report to our observations where the highest PIC value was 0.76 from primer (GAC) TCC5. This was the most informative primer compared with the remaining primers in our study.</p><p>Highest Nei’s gene diversity (0.42) was observed in population from East Asia and West Africa. High number of accessions from East Asia was used in this study and that could be a reason for high diversity observed. Relatively higher genetic diversity was detected in African populations by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref22">22</xref>] by using AFLP markers. This is similar to our study where the overall genetic diversity detected in African populations was higher except for a population from East Africa. Low gene diversity was recorded in East African accessions indicating high similarity of the accessions in the region. In all these observations, Shannon’s information index values were relatively higher than Nei’s gene diversity. Apart from gene diversity based on different origins; average gene diversity (h) for complete set of all accessions was 0.34 and Shannon’s information index was 0.49. This shows that there is relatively high level of genetic variation among these accessions. Similar results were reported in N. nimmoniana, an endangered medicinal plant in India (h = 0.3; I = 0.44) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref32">32</xref>] . [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref33">33</xref>] reported a gene diversity of 0.29 in goat’s rue accessions by using ISSR markers.</p><p>Highest pairwise genetic distance was observed between the unknown accessions and the East African accessions. This indicated that East African accessions were more distinguished from the unknown accessions and the rest of other accessions. These results corroborated with the Nei’s gene diversity recorded in this study. We recorded higher genetic distances in populations from East and North Africa than from the rest of other population under the present study. The remaining populations were relatively similar. This similarity may be due to sharing of genetic materials between different regions or possibly due common parents especially for accessions from East Asia and Southeast Asia where there is long history of domestication and breeding of Jute mallow [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref34">34</xref>] .</p><p>In PCoA where PC1 and PC2 explained 33.4%, accessions from East Africa were distinctly found in the first and fourth quadrant separated from other accessions. This pattern of clustering is also supported by the results of Nei’s pairwise genetic distance reported in this study that showed highest distance between these accessions and the rest. There was no clearly defined pattern of clustering for the remaining accessions as they overlapped in different quadrants of the PCoA. Accessions such as Cameroon Ex. Co, TOT 4623, TOT 4624, GKK 10, ES and ML-JM-10 displayed highest diversity across all four quadrants. In cluster analysis six clusters were obtained at genetic similarity coefficient of 0.53, however the clustering of geographically closer accessions was not clearly reflected in dendrogram except for cluster 4 which contained accessions from Asia. This showed that the association between genetic similarity and geographical location was insignificant. Similar results were reported in goat’s rue [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref33">33</xref>] and in Azuki bean [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.133216-ref35">35</xref>] . Although there was no clearly defined clustering pattern reflecting geographical distribution of the accessions in the six clusters generated, generally accessions from Africa and Asia were grouped separately. This could be attributed to species differences where most of Asian accessions were from C. capsularis where as those from Africa were mostly from C. olitorius.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Our results indicated the presence of great genetic diversity among jute mallow collection. Genetic variation among this germplasm as revealed by ISSR markers could be useful in selection of parental lines that can be crossed to generate populations that are suitable for breeding. The findings of this study can also be used in conservation of this underutilized vegetable.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This research was funded by the Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology through scholarship funds from the Government of Tanzania. Seed samples of germplasm accessions for molecular characterization were kindly provided by the World Vegetable Centre Eastern and Southern Africa.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ngomuo, M., Stoilova, T., Feyissa, T. and Ndakidemi, P.A. (2024) Genetic Diversity of Jute Mallow (Corchorus spp.) Accessions Based on ISSR Markers. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 15, 316-328. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2024.155023</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.133216-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Merlier</surname><given-names> H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1972</year>)<article-title>Phenological Studies of Fallow Species in Central Senegal (Synthesis)</article-title><source>&lt;i&gt; Agronomie Tropicale&lt;/i&gt;</source><volume> 27</volume>,<fpage> 1229</fpage>-<lpage>1252</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Morakinyo</surname><given-names> J.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1997</year>)<article-title>Morphology and Cytogenetics of &lt;i&gt;Corchorus olitorius&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Corchorus tridens&lt;/i&gt;</article-title><source> &lt;i&gt;Biosciences Research Communications&lt;/i&gt;</source><volume> 9</volume>,<fpage> 9</fpage>-<lpage>13</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dansi, A., Adjatin, A., Adoukonou-Sagbadja, H., Falade, V., Yedomonhan, H., Odou, D. and Dossou, B. (2008) Traditional Leafy Vegetable and Their Use in the Benin Republic. &lt;i&gt;Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution&lt;/i&gt;, 55, 1239-1256. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-008-9324-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fagbohoun, E.D. and Ibrahim, T.A. (2011) Plant Biologist. Abstract: 2010; Physicochemical Properties and &lt;i&gt;in Vitro&lt;/i&gt; Antibacterial Activity of &lt;i&gt;Corchorus olitorius&lt;/i&gt; Linn. Seed Oil. &lt;i&gt;Life Sciences Leaflets&lt;/i&gt;, 15, 499-505.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adebo, H.O., Ahoton, L.E., Quenum, F. and Ezin, V. (2015) Agro-Morphological Characterization of &lt;i&gt;Corchorus olitorius&lt;/i&gt; Cultivars of Benin. &lt;i&gt;Annual Research &amp; R&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;e&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;view in Biology&lt;/i&gt;, 7, 229-240. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.9734/ARRB/2015/17642</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ndlovu, J. and Afolayan, A.J. (2008) Nutritional Analysis of the South African Wild Vegetable &lt;i&gt;Corchorus olitorius&lt;/i&gt; L. &lt;i&gt;Asian Journal of Plant Sciences&lt;/i&gt;, 7, 615-618. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2008.615.618</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tulio, A.Z., Ose, K., Chachin, K. and Ueda, Y. (2002) Effects of Storage Temperatures on the Postharvest Quality of Jute Leaves (&lt;i&gt;Corchorus olitorius&lt;/i&gt; L.). &lt;i&gt;Postharvest Biology and Technology&lt;/i&gt;, 26, 329-338. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(02)00065-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumawat, B.K., Gupta, M. and Singh, T.Y. (2012) Free Radical Scavenging Effect of Various Extracts of Leaves of &lt;i&gt;Balanites aegyptiaca&lt;/i&gt; (L.) Delile by DPPH Method. &lt;i&gt;Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research&lt;/i&gt;, 2, 323-329.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barku, V.Y.A., Opoku-Boahen, Y., Owusu-Ansah, E., Dayie, N.T.K.D. and Mensah, F.E. (2013) &lt;i&gt;In&lt;/i&gt;-&lt;i&gt;Vitro&lt;/i&gt; Assessment of Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Methanol Extracts of Six Wound Healing Medicinal Plants. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Natural Sciences Research&lt;/i&gt;, 3, 74-80.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tareq, Z., Bashar, K.K., Amin, R., Sarker, M.D.H., Moniruzzaman, M., Sarker, M.S.A. and Islam, S. (2020) Nutritional Composition of Some Jute Genotypes as Vegetables. &lt;i&gt;International Journal of Vegetable Science&lt;/i&gt;, 26, 506-515. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/19315260.2019.1658686</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngomuo, M.S., Stoilova, T., Feyissa, T., Kassim, N. and Ndakidemi, P.A. (2017) Leaf and Seed Yield of Jute Mallow (&lt;i&gt;Corchorus olitorius&lt;/i&gt; L.) Accessions under Field Conditions for Two Consecutive Growing Seasons. &lt;i&gt;The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology&lt;/i&gt;, 92, 614-620. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2017.1304168</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dansi, A., Vodouhe, R., Azokpota, P., Yedomonhan, H., Assogba, P., Adjatin, A., Loko, Y.L., Dossou-Aminon, I. and Akpagana, K. (2012) Diversity of the Neglected and Underutilized Crop Species of Importance in Benin. &lt;i&gt;The Scientific World Journal&lt;/i&gt;, 2012, Article ID: 932947. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/932947</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nyadanu, D. and Lowor, S.T. (2015) Promoting Competitiveness of Neglected and Underutilized Crop Species: Comparative Analysis of Nutritional Composition of Indigenous and Exotic Leafy and Fruit Vegetables in Ghana. &lt;i&gt;Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution&lt;/i&gt;, 62, 131-140. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-014-0162-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olanrewaju, A.D. and Nwangburuka, C.C. (2012) Morphological Diversity among &lt;i&gt;Corchorus olitorius&lt;/i&gt; Accessions Based on Single Linkage Cluster Analysis and Principal Components Analysis. &lt;i&gt;Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences&lt;/i&gt;, 5, 191-196.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sultan, M., Ashiq Rabbani, M., Shinwari, Z.K. and Masood, M.S. (2012) Phenotypic Divergence in Guar (&lt;i&gt;Cyamopsis tetragonoloba&lt;/i&gt;) Landrace Genotypes of Pakistan. &lt;i&gt;Pakistan Journal of Botany&lt;/i&gt;, 44, 203-210.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roy, A., Bandyopadhyay, A., Mahapatra, A.K., Ghosh, S.K., Singh, N.K., Bansal, K.C., Koundal, K.R. and Mohapatra, T. (2006) Evaluation of Genetic Diversity in Jute (Corchorus Species) Using STMS, ISSR and RAPD Markers. &lt;i&gt;Plant Breeding&lt;/i&gt;, 125, 292-297. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2006.01208.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mandal, A., Datta, A.K., Datta, S. and Gupta, S. (2013) Genetic Assessment of Eight Corchorus Spp. (Tiliaceae) Using RAPD and ISSR Markers. &lt;i&gt;The Nucleus&lt;/i&gt;, 56, 23-30. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s13237-013-0076-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mir, R.R., Rustgi, S., Sharma, S., Singh, R., Goyal, A., Kumar, J., Gaur, A., Tyagi, A.K., Khan, H., Sinha, M.K. and Balyan, H.S. (2008) A Preliminary Genetic Analysis of Fibre Traits and the Use of New Genomic SSRs for Genetic Diversity in Jute. &lt;i&gt;Euphytica&lt;/i&gt;, 161, 413-427. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9597-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mir, R.R., Banerjee, S., Das, M., Gupta, V., Tyagi, A.K., Sinha, M.K. and Gupta, P.K. (2009) Development and Characterization of Large-Scale Simple Sequence Repeats in Jute. &lt;i&gt;Crop Science&lt;/i&gt;, 49, 1687-1694. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2008.10.0599</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huq, S., Islam, M.S., Sajib, A.A., Ashraf, N., Haque, S. and Khan, H. (2009) Genetic Diversity and Relationships in Jute (Corchorus Spp.) Revealed by SSR Markers. &lt;i&gt;Bangladesh Journal of Botany&lt;/i&gt;, 38, 153-161. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3329/bjb.v38i2.5140</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Banerjee, S., Das, M., Mir, R.R., Kundu, A., Topdar, N., Sarkar, D. and Gupta, P.K. (2012) Assessment of Genetic Diversity and Population Structure in a Selected Germplasm Collection of 292 Jute Genotypes by Microsatellite (SSR) Markers. &lt;i&gt;M&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;o&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;lecular Plant Breeding&lt;/i&gt;, 3, 11-25. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.5376/mpb.2012.03.0002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khan, H., Akter, J., Islam, M.S., Sajib, A.A., Ashraf, N. and Haque, S. (2008) Microsatellite Markers for Determining Genetic Identities and Genetic Diversity among Jute Cultivars. &lt;i&gt;Australian Journal of Crop Science&lt;/i&gt;, 1, 97-107.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Benor, S., Demissew, S., Hammer, K. and Blattner, F.R. (2012) Genetic Diversity and Relationships in &lt;i&gt;Corchorus olitorius&lt;/i&gt; (Malvaceae Sl) Inferred from Molecular and Morphological Data. &lt;i&gt;Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution&lt;/i&gt;, 59, 1125-1146. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-011-9748-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Das, M., Banerjee, S., Topdar, N., Kundu, A., Sarkar, D., Sinha, M.K. and Gupta, P.K. (2011) Development of Large-Scale AFLP Markers in Jute. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Plant B&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;i&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;ochemistry and Biotechnology&lt;/i&gt;, 20, 270-275. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-011-0058-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, Y., Zhang, L., Qi, J., Chen, H., Tao, A., Xu, J., Lin, L. and Fan, P. (2014) Genetic Linkage Map Construction for White Jute (&lt;i&gt;Corchorus capsularis&lt;/i&gt; L.) Using SRAP, ISSR and RAPD Markers. &lt;i&gt;Plant Breeding&lt;/i&gt;, 133, 777-781. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12205</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soliman, M.I., Zaghloul, M.S. and Heikal, Y.M. (2014) Genetic Variation within and among Three Egyptian Mesembryanthemum Species Using Different Genetic Markers. &lt;i&gt;Egyptian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences&lt;/i&gt;, 1, 127-135. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbas.2014.08.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Noormohammadi, Z., Fasihee, A., Homaee-Rashidpoor, S., Sheidai, M., Baraki, S.G., Mazooji, A., &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2012) Genetic Variation among Iranian Pomegranates (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;u&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;nica granatum&lt;/i&gt; L.) Using RAPD, ISSR and SSR Markers. &lt;i&gt;Australian Journal of Crop Science&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;6, 268-275.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eftekharian, R., Sheidai, M., Attar, F., Noormohammadi, Z. and Ebadi-Nahari, M. (2017) Morphometric and ISSR Based Variability Analysis to Elucidate Population Genetic Structure in &lt;i&gt;Senecio glaucus&lt;/i&gt; L. (Asteraceae: Senecioneae). &lt;i&gt;The Nucleus&lt;/i&gt;, 60, 43-49.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Doyle, J.J. and Doyle, J.N. (1987) A Rapid DNA Isolation Protocol for Small Quantity of Fresh Leaf Tissue. &lt;i&gt;Phytochemical Bulletin&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;19, 11-15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Botstein, D., White, R.L., Skolnick, M. and Davis, R.W. (1980) Construction of a Genetic Linkage Map in Man Using Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms. &lt;i&gt;American Journal of Human Genetics&lt;/i&gt;, 32, 314-331.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yeh, F.C., Yang, R.C., Boyle, T.B., Ye, Z. and Mao, J.X. (1997) PopGene, the User-Friendly Shareware for Population Genetic Analysis, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Centre. University of Alberta, Edmonton, 10, 295-301.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kareem, V.A., Rajasekharan, P., Mini, S. and Kumar, T.V. (2011) Genetic Diversity and Structure of the Threatened Anti-Cancerous Plant &lt;i&gt;Nothapodytes nimmoniana&lt;/i&gt; as Revealed by ISSR Analysis. &lt;i&gt;Plant Genetic Resources&lt;/i&gt;, 9, 506-514. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262111000803</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, Z., Wang, J.-E., Wang, X.-M., Gao, H.-W., Dzyubenko, N.I. and Chapurin, V.F. (2012) Assessment of Genetic Diversity in &lt;i&gt;Galega officinalis&lt;/i&gt; L. Using ISSR and SRAP Markers. &lt;i&gt;Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution&lt;/i&gt;, 59, 865-873. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-011-9727-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kundu, B. (1951) Origin of Jutepp.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.133216-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yee, E., Kidwell, K., Sills, G. and Lumpkin, T. (1999) Diversity among Selected &lt;i&gt;Vi&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;g&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;na angularis&lt;/i&gt; (Azuki) Accessions on the Basis of RAPD and AFLP Markers. &lt;i&gt;Crop Science&lt;/i&gt;, 39, 268-275. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X003900010041x</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>