<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ajcc
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     American Journal of Climate Change
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2167-9495
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2167-9509
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ajcc.2024.132006
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ajcc-132975
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Earth 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Environmental Sciences
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    The Future Trend of E-Mobility in Terms of Battery Electric Vehicles and Their Impact on Climate Change: A Case Study Applied in Hungary
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Mohamad Ali Saleh
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Saleh
      </given-names>
     </name>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="affnull">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Economics and Management, Institute of Social Sciences, University of Dunaujvaros, Dunaujvaros, Hungary
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     08
    </day> 
    <month>
     05
    </month>
    <year>
     2024
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    13
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    02
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    83
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    102
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      14,
     </day>
     <month>
      February
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      5,
     </day>
     <month>
      February
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      5,
     </day>
     <month>
      May
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    The transportation sector is responsible for 25% of the total Carbon dioxide (CO
    <sub>2</sub>) emissions, whereas 60.6% of this sector represents small and medium passenger cars. However, as noted by the European Union Long-term strategy, there are two ways to reduce the amount of CO
    <sub>2</sub> emissions in the transportation sector. The first way is characterized by creating more efficient vehicles. In contrast, the second way is characterized by changing the fuel used. The current study addressed the second way, changing the fuel type. The study examined the potential of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) as an alternative fuel type to reduce CO
    <sub>2</sub> emissions in Hungary’s transportation sector. The study used secondary data retrieved from Statista and stata.com to analyze the future trends of BEVs in Hungary. The results showed that the percentage of BEVs in Hungary in 2022 was 0.4% compared to the total number of registered passenger cars, which is 3.8 million. The simple exponential smoothing (SES) time series forecast revealed that the number of BEVs is expected to reach 84,192 in 2030, indicating a percentage increase of 2.21% in the next eight years. The study suggests that increasing the number of BEVs is necessary to address the negative impact of CO
    <sub>2</sub> emissions on society. The Hungarian Ministry of Innovation and Technology’s strategy to reduce the cost of BEVs may increase the percentage of BEVs by 10%, resulting in a potential average reduction of 76,957,600 g/km of CO
    <sub>2</sub> compared to gasoline, diesel, hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), and plug-in hybrid vehicles (PHEVs).
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVS)
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Gasoline
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Diesel
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEVs)
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Plug-In Hybrid Vehicles (PHEVs)
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Climate Change
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Carbon Dioxide (CO
     <sub>2</sub>) Emissions
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Climate change is widely recognized as a critical global concern due to the continued emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, posing a significant and long-term risk to both the natural environment and society. The massive increase in Carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions from petroleum vehicles over the last decade has strongly encouraged major automobile manufacturers to shift to environmentally friendly technologies in an effort to significantly reduce the high amount of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions caused by petroleum vehicles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-24">
     (Pažun et al., 2019)
    </xref>. According to the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-8">
     EEA (2021)
    </xref>, “the automotive sector is the largest factor contributing to the European Union’s emissions of CO<sub>2</sub>”. However, additional expansion of the EU’s Battery electric vehicles (BEVs) might support the EU in achieving emission depletion goals and making steady progress toward their long-term goal of becoming GHGs-free by the next 20 years. BEVs are considered a crucial goal of Europe’s mobility system, helping mitigate the consequences of climate change and air pollution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-24">
     (Pažun et al., 2019)
    </xref>. Globally, it has been agreed that BEVs are a potentially crucial part of the climate change solution plan <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-19">
     (Lomborg, 2013)
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>In 2017, BEVs accounted for approximately 0.6% of the new cars enrolled in the European Union <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-7">
     (EEA, 2018)
    </xref>. Based on future EU-WFA CO<sub>2</sub> prescribed limits for small and medium automobiles, BEVs might contribute 4% to 13.1% of new vehicles enrolled by 2030 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-6">
     (EC, 2017)
    </xref>. While in 2022, in the European Union’s 28 countries, BEVs accounted for approximately 9.9% of all new car enrollments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-1">
     (ACEA, 2022)
    </xref>. In comparison, there is an apparent disparity between the European Union members. The considerable disparity between the European Union members can be clearly seen. In comparison, in 2022, the number of BEVs in Germany reached 32,234 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-16">
     (Kane, 2022)
    </xref>. While in 2022, the number of BEVs in Hungary reached 18,800 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-21">
     (Medve, 2022)
    </xref>. However, the number of BEVs in Hungary has increased considerably in the last seven years. The BEVs saw the light officially in Hungary in 2016 with about 405 BEVs, which is considered the start of the BEVs in Hungary <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-21">
     (Medve, 2022)
    </xref>. After 2016, the number of BEVs in Hungary increased significantly, with 1153 new BEVs recorded in 2017, 2460 in 2018, 3696 in 2019, 6101 in 2020, 10,626 in 2021, and 18,800 in 2022 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-21">
     (Medve, 2022)
    </xref>. The modern transportation system and climate change are firmly bound in various manners <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-12">
     (Fuinhas et al., 2021)
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>A large number of empirical research have examined the link between BEVs and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in response to climate change. Based on <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
     Table 1
    </xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-5">
     Doucette and McCulloch (2011)
    </xref> examined the relationship between BEVs and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. As a result, they found that BEVs can reduce up to 68.88% of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions compared to fuel vehicles. Furthermore, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-3">
     Casals et al. (2016)
    </xref> discovered that BEVs could help decrease harmful emissions, particularly in densely crowded regions. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-14">
     Hofmann et al. (2016)
    </xref> investigated the impact of BEVs on Carbon dioxide emissions. The investigation findings indicated that BEVs could assist in lowering carbon dioxide emissions by 25% of the total CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-22">
     Mishina and Muromachi (2017)
    </xref> determined by estimating the possible future Carbon dioxide emissions reductions from BEVs in Japan. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-25">
     Plötz et al. (2018)
    </xref> studied the impact of daily and annual driving on fuel economy and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles in the United States. The study examined Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs), revealing deviations from standardized values ranging from 2% to 120%, particularly in short-ranged models. It shows daily and annual driving distances significantly impact fuel consumption showing a decrease of 2% to 3% in CO<sub>2</sub> emissions per additional km of electric range. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-11">
     Fritz et al. (2019)
    </xref> explored and examined the impact of fuel economy regulations on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reduction, highlighting the importance of plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) to achieve targets below 75 gCO<sub>2</sub>/km. Analyzing European regulations, which aim for 59.4 gCO<sub>2</sub>/km by 2030, it projected PEV sales and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions based on data from 2010 to 2016, showing a need for PEVs to represent 27% to 41% of sales by 2030. However, the study suggested that current regulations might not meet car manufacturers’ targets by 2025.</p>
   <table-wrap id="table1">
    <label>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref></label>
    <caption>
     <title>
      <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-"></xref>Table 1. List of empirical research studying the relationship between EVs and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions.</title>
    </caption>
    <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.16%"><p style="text-align:center">Scholars</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.53%"><p style="text-align:center">Perspective</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="45.65%"><p style="text-align:center">Topic</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">Samples</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.16%">
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-5">
        Doucette &amp; McCulloch (2011)
       </xref><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.53%"><p style="text-align:center">Relationship between EVs and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="45.65%"><p style="text-align:center">Modelling the prospects of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles to reduce CO<sub>2</sub> emissions</p></td> 
      <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">China</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.16%">
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-3">
        Casals et al. (2016)
       </xref><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="21.53%"><p style="text-align:center">Relationship between EVs and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="45.65%"><p style="text-align:center">Sustainability analysis of the electric vehicle use in Europe for CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reduction</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">Europe</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.16%">
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-14">
        Hofmann et al. (2016)
       </xref><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="21.53%"><p style="text-align:center">Relationship between EVs and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="45.65%"><p style="text-align:center">Assessment of electric vehicles as a successful driver for reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in China</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">China</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.16%">
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-22">
        Mishina &amp; Muromachi (2017)
       </xref><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="21.53%"><p style="text-align:center">Relationship between EVs and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="45.65%"><p style="text-align:center">Are potential reductions in CO<sub>2</sub> emissions via hybrid electric vehicles actualized in real traffic?</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">Japan</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.16%">
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-25">
        Plötz et al. (2018)
       </xref><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="21.53%"><p style="text-align:center">Relationship between EVs and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="45.65%"><p style="text-align:center">The impact of daily and annual driving on fuel economy and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles.</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">United States of America</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.16%">
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-11">
        Fritz et al. (2019)
       </xref><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="21.53%"><p style="text-align:center">Relationship between EVs and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="45.65%"><p style="text-align:center">The impact of ambitious fuel economy standards on the market uptake of electric vehicles and specific CO<sub>2</sub> emissions.</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">European Union-28 countries</p></td> 
     </tr> 
     <tr> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.16%">
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-18">
        Küfeoğlu &amp; Hong (2020)
       </xref><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="21.53%"><p style="text-align:center">Relationship between EVs and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="45.65%"><p style="text-align:center">Emissions performance of electric vehicles: A case study from the United Kingdom.</p></td> 
      <td class="acenter" width="16.66%"><p style="text-align:center">United Kingdom</p></td> 
     </tr> 
    </table>
   </table-wrap>
   <p>Source: Own elaborations based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-5">
     Doucette &amp; McCulloch (2011)
    </xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-3">
     Casals et al. (2016)
    </xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-14">
     Hofmann et al. (2016)
    </xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-22">
     Mishina &amp; Muromachi (2017)
    </xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-25">
     Plötz et al. (2018)
    </xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-11">
     Fritz et al. (2019)
    </xref>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-18">
     Küfeoğlu &amp; Hong (2020)
    </xref>.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. E-Mobility in Terms of BEVs and CO<sub>2</sub> Emission Reduction</title>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-"></xref>In the last ten years, reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions has become one of the entire world’s interests in serious endeavors to mitigate the consequences of climate change on the entire planet. However, these endeavors were translated into the so-called European Union’s long-term strategy, which seeks to cut CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by more than half over the next 30 years <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-17">
     (Kawase et al., 2006)
    </xref>. In the EU-28 countries, car emissions of CO<sub>2</sub> represent approximately a quarter (25%) of carbon output. Solely transportation sector has seen a rise in CO<sub>2</sub> emissions over the last three decades, 33.5%, compared to the residential and commercial sector, Energy supply sector, industry sector, and agricultural sector <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-9">
     (EP, 2022)
    </xref>, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
     Figure 1
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Road transportation accounted for 71.7% of the 25% of total CO<sub>2</sub> emissions emitted by the transportation sector between 1990 and 2019 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-10">
     (European Environment Agency, 2022)
    </xref>. The CO<sub>2</sub> emissions differ between the modes of transportation, exceptionally hanging on the mode of transportation, which is distributed as follows: 60.6% standard passenger cars, 27.1% Heavy duty trucks, and 11.0% light duty trucks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-9">
     (EP, 2022)
    </xref>, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">
     Figure 2
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>According to the European Union’s long-term strategy, the best way to reduce CO<sub>2</sub> emissions is to change the fuel used for various reasons, including climate change and scarcity of resources. BEVs when compared to fuel vehicles, it is widely assumed that BEVs emit less CO<sub>2</sub> and have high energy efficiency <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-4">
     (Dong, 2020;
    </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-20">
     Magazzino et al., 2021)
    </xref>. Electric vehicles (EVs) utilize electrical power to supplant the current energy sources in the field of transportation to assist in minimizing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and reducing air pollution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-31">
     (Xu et al., 2021)
    </xref>.</p>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Previous Methods for Determining the Connection between EVs and Atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> Emission Levels</title>
    <p>Around 90% of the research examining the relationship between EVs and</p>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 1. CO<sub>2</sub> emission levels by sector since 1990 in the EU [Source: <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-10">
        European Environment Agency (2022)
       </xref>].</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2361412-rId12.jpeg?20240710115553" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig2" position="float">
     <label>Figure 2</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 2. CO<sub>2</sub> emissions broke down by transport mode in the EU in 2019 [Source: <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-10">
        European Environment Agency (2022)
       </xref>].</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2361412-rId13.jpeg?20240710115553" />
    </fig>
    <p>Atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions employed two methods: LR methods and CQR methods <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-31">
      (Xu et al., 2021)
     </xref>. The most frequently used LR methods in previous research examining the relationship between EVs and atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> emissions using LR methods are four OLS, ARDL, FE, and RE. As a shred of evidence, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-26">
      Rauf et al. (2018)
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-27">
      Sarkodi and Adams (2020)
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-29">
      Warsame et al. (2021)
     </xref> utilized LR and, specifically, the autoregressive distributed lag to examine the impact of EVs and atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. In contrast, the CQR method was also employed by many researchers to estimate the relationship between EVs and atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. As evidence, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-30">
      Xu and Lin (2018)
     </xref> employed CQR to examine the variations in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of transportation across regions in China.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Actual CO<sub>2</sub> Emissions Reductions in Terms of Car Energy Types by Numbers Based on Gamber</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-"></xref>In 2022, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-13">
      Gimbert (2022)
     </xref> conducted a laboratory study to answer the question, “How much CO<sub>2</sub> can electric cars really save compared to diesel and gasoline cars?”. To explain how it works, he created an application that consolidates every piece of recent data on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions associated with the utilization of an electric, diesel, or petrol engine. Moreover, the application calculates how much CO<sub>2</sub> each car emits in grams per kilometer based on whether it is (Gasoline, Diesel, full hybrid, plug-in hybrid, or battery electric). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-#HYPERLINK  l R13">
      Gimbert (2022)
     </xref> found that in Europe, EVs release over three times less CO<sub>2</sub> in comparison with petrol vehicles. LCA analysis results were done by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-13">
      Gimbert (2022)
     </xref> revealed that medium Hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) reduce 21% of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> in comparison to same-size fuel cars. Whereas, Pug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) reduce 26% of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> in comparison to the same size fuel cars. In addition, the results of the LCA analysis for BEVs revealed that they are the cleanest among all the vehicles, with 2.4 times fewer emissions than PHEVs. This means BEVs emit 62.4% less CO<sub>2</sub> into the atmosphere than PHEVs as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">
      Figure 3
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-"></xref></p>
    <fig id="fig3" position="float">
     <label>Figure 3</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 3. Car CO<sub>2</sub> g/km emissions by car energy type [Source: Own elaborations based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-13">
        Gimbert (2022)
       </xref>].</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2361412-rId14.jpeg?20240710115554" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Environmentally Friendly E-Mobility in Hungary as a Climate Change Workaround</title>
    <p>In the past few years, Hungary has witnessed a significant shift in its transportation sector, with the number of BEVs and EVs, in general, increasing significantly <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-23">
      (NEA, 2021)
     </xref>. The main driver behind this shift is the Hungarian government’s embracement of the National Energy and Climate strategy to achieve carbon neutrality <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-23">
      (NEA, 2021)
     </xref>. One of the strategy’s primary goals is environmental protection and the carbon neutralization that can be attained by shifting to BEVs and EVs. However, the e-mobility law was passed in the last 10 years, encouraging the use of electric vehicles as well as charging facilities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-23">
      (NEA, 2021)
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>In 2020, The Hungarian Ministry of Innovation and Technology implemented the “Climate and Nature Protection Plan” shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref> to achieve CO<sub>2</sub> neutralization. The Climate and Nature Protection Plan was founded based on eight pillars <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-15">
      Hungarian Ministry of Innovation and Technology (2020)
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-"></xref>Table 2. Hungarian climate and nature protection plan pillars.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.64%"><p style="text-align:center">Number of Pillars</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td aleft" width="85.36%"><p style="text-align:left">Description</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.64%"><p style="text-align:center">Pillar I</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="85.36%"><p style="text-align:left">Eliminate illegal landfills and punish polluters.</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.64%"><p style="text-align:center">Pillar II</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="85.36%"><p style="text-align:left">Ban the sale of disposable plastics and facilitate the return and recycling of glass, plastic bottles, and metal cans.</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.64%"><p style="text-align:center">Pillar III</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="85.36%"><p style="text-align:left">Protect the country’s rivers from waste coming from outside the country.</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.64%"><p style="text-align:center">Pillar IV</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="85.36%"><p style="text-align:left">Force multinational companies operating in Hungary to use environmentally friendly technologies.</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.64%"><p style="text-align:center">Pillar V</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="85.36%"><p style="text-align:left">Ten trees will be planted for every newborn baby.</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.64%"><p style="text-align:center">Pillar VI</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="85.36%"><p style="text-align:left">A six-fold increase in the capacity of solar power plants in the next 10 years.</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.64%"><p style="text-align:center">Pillar VII</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="85.36%"><p style="text-align:left">Market affordable electric cars to increase EVs.</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.64%"><p style="text-align:center">Pillar VIII</p></td> 
       <td class="aleft" width="85.36%"><p style="text-align:left">Launch green government bonds with the proceeds used to invest in environmentally friendly technologies.</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Source: Own elaborations based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-15">
      Hungarian Ministry for Innovation and Technology (2020)
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>According to the seventh pillar of the Climate and Nature Protection Plan shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>, the Hungarian government intends to “bring affordable electric cars to market, with a strong emphasis on subsidizing small and cheap cars, while also transitioning urban public transportation to electric vehicles.” Since then, the BEVs in 2020 increased to reach 6101, 10626 in 2021, and 18800 in 2022 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-21">
      (Medve, 2022)
     </xref>.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Methodology</title>
   <p>This section focuses on the study’s statistical analysis results. The secondary data for this study was obtained from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-28">
     Statista (2023)
    </xref>, which was used to demonstrate the variation in BEVs and the amount of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reduction in Hungary between 2016 and 2022 compared to gasoline, diesel, HEVs, and PHEVs. Furthermore, the time series simple exponential smoothing (SES) method was used since it permitted the accurate prediction of the number of BEVs that will be achieved in 2030, as well as the calculation of the amount of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions that will be reduced based on the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-13">
     Gimbert (2022)
    </xref> tool.</p>
   <p>According to the Gimbert tool, each passenger BEV emits 75 g/km of CO<sub>2</sub>, each gasoline passenger vehicle emits 241 g/km; each diesel passenger vehicle emits 231 g/km; each HEV emits 190 g/km; each passenger PHEV emits 178 g/km of CO<sub>2</sub>. The objective of this study is to predict the future numbers of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and their corresponding CO<sub>2</sub> reduction in Hungary for the next seven years.</p>
   <p>To accomplish this, the research utilized time series data sourced from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-28">
     Statista (2023)
    </xref>, spanning the years 2016 to 2022. The time series data was disintegrated into its three key components: trend, seasonal, and error. The SES technique was applied to model the time series data, accounting for both the trend and seasonal components. The smoothing constant, alpha, and the seasonal smoothing constant, gamma, were optimized to minimize the Mean Squared Error (MSE) of the model. Finally, the model was employed to predict the BEVs number and CO<sub>2</sub> reduction in g/km for the time period between 2023 and 2030. The SES formula was used in this process.</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         F 
       </mi> 
       <mi>
         t 
       </mi> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mi>
        α 
      </mi> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         A 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          t 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
      <mo>
        + 
      </mo> 
      <mrow> 
       <mo>
         ( 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mi>
          α 
        </mi> 
       </mrow> 
       <mo>
         ) 
       </mo> 
      </mrow> 
      <msub> 
       <mi>
         F 
       </mi> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          t 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          − 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          1 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </msub> 
     </mrow> 
    </math></p>
   <p>
    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-"></xref>In this formula, F<sub>t</sub> represents the forecasted value for the next period, A<sub>t</sub><sub>−1</sub> represents the actual value for the previous period, and F<sub>t</sub><sub>−1</sub> represents the forecasted value for the previous period.</p>
   <p>The alpha (α) in the formula is the smoothing constant, which determines the weight given to the most recent observation versus the previous forecast. A higher alpha value gives more weight to the most recent observation, while a lower alpha value gives more weight to the previous forecast.</p>
   <p>The goal is to find the value of alpha that minimizes the sum of squared errors between the predicted values and the actual values.</p>
   <p>The formula to calculate the alpha value using the method of least squares is as follows:</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        α 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        1 
      </mn> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          Σ 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             Y 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             t 
           </mi> 
          </msub> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             S 
           </mi> 
           <mrow> 
            <mi>
              t 
            </mi> 
            <mo>
              − 
            </mo> 
            <mn>
              1 
            </mn> 
           </mrow> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ∗ 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             Y 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             t 
           </mi> 
          </msub> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             S 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             t 
           </mi> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          Σ 
        </mi> 
        <msup> 
         <mrow> 
          <mrow> 
           <mo>
             ( 
           </mo> 
           <mrow> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               Y 
             </mi> 
             <mi>
               t 
             </mi> 
            </msub> 
            <mo>
              − 
            </mo> 
            <msub> 
             <mi>
               S 
             </mi> 
             <mrow> 
              <mi>
                t 
              </mi> 
              <mo>
                − 
              </mo> 
              <mn>
                1 
              </mn> 
             </mrow> 
            </msub> 
           </mrow> 
           <mo>
             ) 
           </mo> 
          </mrow> 
         </mrow> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
     </mrow> 
    </math> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-2">
     (Brown, 1956)
    </xref></p>
   <p>where:</p>
   <p>The number of periods (N) = 7.</p>
   <p>The numerator of the formula;</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mtable columnalign="left"> 
      <mtr> 
       <mtd> 
        <mi>
          Σ 
        </mi> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             Y 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             t 
           </mi> 
          </msub> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             S 
           </mi> 
           <mrow> 
            <mi>
              t 
            </mi> 
            <mo>
              − 
            </mo> 
            <mn>
              1 
            </mn> 
           </mrow> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ∗ 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             Y 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             t 
           </mi> 
          </msub> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             S 
           </mi> 
           <mi>
             t 
           </mi> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mtd> 
      </mtr> 
      <mtr> 
       <mtd> 
        <mo>
          = 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             Y 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             1 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             S 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             0 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ∗ 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             Y 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             1 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             S 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             1 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             Y 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             2 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             S 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             1 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ∗ 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             Y 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             2 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             S 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             2 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             Y 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             3 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             S 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             2 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ∗ 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             Y 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             3 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             S 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             3 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mtd> 
      </mtr> 
      <mtr> 
       <mtd> 
        <mtext>
            
        </mtext> 
        <mtext>
            
        </mtext> 
        <mtext>
            
        </mtext> 
        <mtext>
            
        </mtext> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             Y 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             4 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             S 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             3 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ∗ 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             Y 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             4 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             S 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             4 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             Y 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             5 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             S 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             4 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ∗ 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             Y 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             5 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             S 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             5 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             Y 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             6 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             S 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             5 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ∗ 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             Y 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             6 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             S 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             6 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mtd> 
      </mtr> 
      <mtr> 
       <mtd> 
        <mtext>
            
        </mtext> 
        <mtext>
            
        </mtext> 
        <mtext>
            
        </mtext> 
        <mtext>
            
        </mtext> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             Y 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             7 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             S 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             6 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          ∗ 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mo>
           ( 
         </mo> 
         <mrow> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             Y 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             7 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
          <mo>
            − 
          </mo> 
          <msub> 
           <mi>
             S 
           </mi> 
           <mn>
             7 
           </mn> 
          </msub> 
         </mrow> 
         <mo>
           ) 
         </mo> 
        </mrow> 
       </mtd> 
      </mtr> 
      <mtr> 
       <mtd> 
        <mo>
          = 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          33187479 
        </mn> 
       </mtd> 
      </mtr> 
     </mtable> 
    </math></p>
   <p>the denominator of the formula;</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mtable> 
      <mtr> 
       <mtd> 
        <mi>
          Σ 
        </mi> 
        <msup> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            ( 
          </mo> 
          <mrow> 
           <msub> 
            <mi>
              Y 
            </mi> 
            <mi>
              t 
            </mi> 
           </msub> 
           <mo>
             − 
           </mo> 
           <msub> 
            <mi>
              S 
            </mi> 
            <mrow> 
             <mi>
               t 
             </mi> 
             <mo>
               − 
             </mo> 
             <mn>
               1 
             </mn> 
            </mrow> 
           </msub> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            ) 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
        <mo>
          = 
        </mo> 
        <msup> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            ( 
          </mo> 
          <mrow> 
           <msub> 
            <mi>
              Y 
            </mi> 
            <mn>
              1 
            </mn> 
           </msub> 
           <mo>
             − 
           </mo> 
           <msub> 
            <mi>
              S 
            </mi> 
            <mn>
              0 
            </mn> 
           </msub> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            ) 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <msup> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            ( 
          </mo> 
          <mrow> 
           <msub> 
            <mi>
              Y 
            </mi> 
            <mn>
              2 
            </mn> 
           </msub> 
           <mo>
             − 
           </mo> 
           <msub> 
            <mi>
              S 
            </mi> 
            <mn>
              1 
            </mn> 
           </msub> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            ) 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <msup> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            ( 
          </mo> 
          <mrow> 
           <msub> 
            <mi>
              Y 
            </mi> 
            <mn>
              3 
            </mn> 
           </msub> 
           <mo>
             − 
           </mo> 
           <msub> 
            <mi>
              S 
            </mi> 
            <mn>
              2 
            </mn> 
           </msub> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            ) 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <msup> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            ( 
          </mo> 
          <mrow> 
           <msub> 
            <mi>
              Y 
            </mi> 
            <mn>
              4 
            </mn> 
           </msub> 
           <mo>
             − 
           </mo> 
           <msub> 
            <mi>
              S 
            </mi> 
            <mn>
              3 
            </mn> 
           </msub> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            ) 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
       </mtd> 
      </mtr> 
      <mtr> 
       <mtd> 
        <mtext>
            
        </mtext> 
        <mtext>
            
        </mtext> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <msup> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            ( 
          </mo> 
          <mrow> 
           <msub> 
            <mi>
              Y 
            </mi> 
            <mn>
              5 
            </mn> 
           </msub> 
           <mo>
             − 
           </mo> 
           <msub> 
            <mi>
              S 
            </mi> 
            <mn>
              4 
            </mn> 
           </msub> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            ) 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <msup> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            ( 
          </mo> 
          <mrow> 
           <msub> 
            <mi>
              Y 
            </mi> 
            <mn>
              6 
            </mn> 
           </msub> 
           <mo>
             − 
           </mo> 
           <msub> 
            <mi>
              S 
            </mi> 
            <mn>
              5 
            </mn> 
           </msub> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            ) 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
        <mo>
          + 
        </mo> 
        <msup> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            ( 
          </mo> 
          <mrow> 
           <msub> 
            <mi>
              Y 
            </mi> 
            <mn>
              7 
            </mn> 
           </msub> 
           <mo>
             − 
           </mo> 
           <msub> 
            <mi>
              S 
            </mi> 
            <mn>
              6 
            </mn> 
           </msub> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            ) 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
         <mn>
           2 
         </mn> 
        </msup> 
       </mtd> 
      </mtr> 
      <mtr> 
       <mtd> 
        <mo>
          = 
        </mo> 
        <mn>
          79779266 
        </mn> 
       </mtd> 
      </mtr> 
     </mtable> 
    </math></p>
   <p>the alpha value α = 1 − (numerator/denominator);</p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mtext>
        alpha 
      </mtext> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        1 
      </mn> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtext>
          numerator 
        </mtext> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mtext>
          denominator 
        </mtext> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
     </mrow> 
    </math></p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        α 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        1 
      </mn> 
      <mo>
        − 
      </mo> 
      <mfrac> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          33187479 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
       <mrow> 
        <mn>
          79779266 
        </mn> 
       </mrow> 
      </mfrac> 
     </mrow> 
    </math></p>
   <p>
    <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
      <mi>
        α 
      </mi> 
      <mo>
        = 
      </mo> 
      <mn>
        0.584 
      </mn> 
     </mrow> 
    </math></p>
   <p>Essentially, the formula is used to update the forecast for the next period based on the actual value from the previous period and the forecasted value from the previous period, with the smoothing constant determining the weight given to each component. This iterative process is repeated for each period in the time series, producing a forecast for each period based on the actual and forecasted values from the previous periods.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Results and Discussion</title>
   <sec id="s4_1">
    <title>4.1. Number of BEVs Variation and Amount of CO<sub>2</sub> Emissions Reduced Since 2016</title>
    <p>The graphs below show the variation in the number of BEVs between 2016 and 2022 based on the data collected from Stata, as well as the amount of CO<sub>2</sub> emission in g per km and the estimated.</p>
    <fig id="fig4" position="float">
     <label>Figure 4</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 4. Number of BEVs in Hungary between 2016 and 2022 [Source: Own elaborations based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-28">
        Statista (2023)
       </xref>].</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2361412-rId41.jpeg?20240710115555" />
    </fig>
    <p>According to the line graph above <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">
      Figure 4
     </xref>, the number of BEVs in Hungary has increased significantly over the last seven years. The BEVs first appeared in Hungary in 2016, with approximately 405 BEVs, which is considered the start of the BEVs in Hungary. After 2016, there was a significant increase in the number of BEVs in Hungary, with 1153 new BEVs recorded in 2017, 2460 in 2018, 3696 in 2019, 6101 in 2020, 10,626 in 2021, and 18,800 in 2022.</p>
    <p>The graph compares the CO<sub>2</sub> emissions g/km of battery electric vehicles (BEVs), diesel vehicles, gasoline vehicles, PHEVs, and HEVs in Hungary from 2016 to 2022. The graph helps calculate the CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and reduction in g/km reduced by BEVs each year compared to other commonly used energy vehicle types.</p>
    <p>Based on <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>, however, if the same number of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) is replaced with different types of vehicles, the emissions would vary. Based on the Gimbert tool, if the same number of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) are replaced with gasoline vehicles, the gasoline vehicles would emit 97605 g/km. While diesel vehicles would emit 93555 g/km, hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) would emit 76950 g/km, and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) would emit 72090 g/km. These comparisons indicate that using 405 BEVs instead of the other vehicle types resulted in an average reduction of 54675 g/km of CO<sub>2</sub>.</p>
    <fig id="fig5" position="float">
     <label>Figure 5</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 5. CO<sub>2</sub> emissions g/km of BEVs/ Diesel vehicles, Gasoline vehicles, PHEVs, and HEVs in case of the same number of BEVs registered between 2016 to 2022 and BEVs CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reduction in Hungary [Source: Own elaborations based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-13">
        Gimbert’s (2022)
       </xref> tool].</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2361412-rId42.jpeg?20240710115555" />
    </fig>
    <p>In 2017, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>, using 1153 BEVs instead of the other types of vehicles led to an average reduction of 155,655 g/km of CO<sub>2</sub>.</p>
    <p>In 2018, using 2460 BEVs instead of the other vehicle types resulted in an average reduction of 332,100 g/km of CO<sub>2</sub>.</p>
    <p>Moreover, in 2019, as demonstrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>, using 3696 BEVs instead of the other types of vehicles led to an average reduction of 498,960 g/km of CO<sub>2</sub>.</p>
    <p>In 2020 as revealed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>, using 6101 BEVs instead of the other vehicle types results in an average reduction of 823,635 g/km of CO<sub>2</sub>.</p>
    <p>In 2021, as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>, using 10,626 BEVs instead of the other types of vehicles led to an average reduction of 1,434,410 g/km of CO<sub>2</sub>.</p>
    <p>In 2022 as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">
      Figure 5
     </xref>, using 18,800 BEVs instead of the other vehicle types results in an average reduction of 2,538,000 g/km of CO<sub>2</sub>.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_2">
    <title>4.2. Simple Exponential Smoothing (SES) Assumptions Testing</title>
    <p>Before applying any statistical model, it is important to understand the assumptions that underlie the model. The same holds true for the exponential smoothing method, which is widely used for SES time series forecasting. SES assumes that the time series data is stationary, has constant variance (homoscedasticity), and that the errors follow a normal distribution. These assumptions are crucial for accurate forecasting, as violating them can lead to biased and unreliable results. Therefore, it is important to test these assumptions before applying the SES method to ensure the validity of the model. In this regard, various statistical tests can be used to check for violations of these assumptions, and corrective measures can be taken accordingly to improve the accuracy and reliability of the forecasting model.</p>
    <p>To test the stationarity assumption, an Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test on the original time series data for the number of BEVs in Hungary was performed. As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref>, the result reveals that the data is non-stationary, which implies that the mean and variance of the data are changing over time. This means that the time series data has a trend component that should be removed to make the data stationary. However, as the ADF statistic is greater than the 1% critical value and the p-value &gt; 0.05, it was not possible to reject the null hypothesis that the time series has a unit root and is non-stationary, so further investigations are needed.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-"></xref>Table 3. Augmented Dickey–Fuller test (1).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="18.83%"><p style="text-align:center">ADF Statistic</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.60%"><p style="text-align:center">p-value</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.99%"><p style="text-align:center">1% Critical Value</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="22.02%"><p style="text-align:center">5% Critical Value</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="24.56%"><p style="text-align:center">10% Critical Value</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="18.83%"><p style="text-align:center">4.425231</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.60%"><p style="text-align:center">1.0</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.99%"><p style="text-align:center">−6.045</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="22.02%"><p style="text-align:center">−3.929</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="24.56%"><p style="text-align:center">−2.987</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Source: Own elaborations based on Statista using Python, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-https://www.statista.com/statistics/1188385/hungary-number-of-battery-electric">
      https://www.statista.com/statistics/1188385/hungary-number-of-battery-electric
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>To address this issue, the Logarithmic transformation and differencing transformation were used consecutively. Logarithmic transformation was used to stabilize the variance of the data and can reduce the magnitude of the trend, and differencing, on the other hand, was used to remove the trend and seasonality from the data. By combining these two techniques, we created a stationary time series that is suitable for forecasting using SES or other time series models, shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref>. However, as the ADF statistic is less than the 1% critical value and the p-value&lt; 0.05, we were able to reject the null hypothesis that states that the time series has a unit root and is non-stationary.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table4">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
       Table 4
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-"></xref>Table 4. Augmented Dickey–Fuller test (2).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.74%"><p style="text-align:center">ADF Statistic</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.68%"><p style="text-align:center">p-value</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="23.61%"><p style="text-align:center">1% Critical Value</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.48%"><p style="text-align:center">5% Critical Value</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="23.50%"><p style="text-align:center">10% Critical Value</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.74%"><p style="text-align:center">−11.317</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.68%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.61%"><p style="text-align:center">−7.355</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.48%"><p style="text-align:center">−4.474</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.50%"><p style="text-align:center">−3.127</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Source: Own elaborations based on Statista using Python, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-https://www.statista.com/statistics/1188385/hungary-number-of-battery-electric">
      https://www.statista.com/statistics/1188385/hungary-number-of-battery-electric
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>To test the homoscedasticity assumption (constant variance), a residuals plot was developed to check the pattern of the residuals. The scatter plot <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">
      Figure 6
     </xref> shows a random scatter of points around the horizontal line at zero, indicating that the variance of the residuals is constant across the range of time series.</p>
    <fig id="fig6" position="float">
     <label>Figure 6</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 6. The variance scatter plot [Source: Own elaborations based on Statista using Python, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-https://www.statista.com/statistics/1188385/hungary-number-of-battery-electric">
        https://www.statista.com/statistics/1188385/hungary-number-of-battery-electric
       </xref>].</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2361412-rId45.jpeg?20240710115556" />
    </fig>
    <p>Based on <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
      Table 5
     </xref>, the Shapiro-Wilk test statistic is 0.98, which is close to 1. This suggests that the sample is not significantly different from a normal distribution. The Shapiro-Wilk test p-value &lt; 0.05, assuming that the null hypothesis is true. This suggests that there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis that the sample is normally distributed. Therefore, based on the Shapiro-Wilk test results, there is no strong evidence to suggest that the sample is not normally distributed. However, the interpretation of the Shapiro-Wilk test results should be considered in conjunction with other statistical diagnostics, such as visual inspection of the data, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">
      Figure 7
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table5">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
       Table 5
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-"></xref>Table 5. Shapiro-Wilk Test.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="100.00%" colspan="2"><p style="text-align:center">Shapiro-Wilk test</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="53.41%"><p style="text-align:center">Shapiro-Wilk test statistic</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="46.59%"><p style="text-align:center">0.988</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="53.41%"><p style="text-align:center">p-value</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="46.59%"><p style="text-align:center">0.512</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Source: Own elaborations based on Statista using Python, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-https://www.statista.com/statistics/1188385/hungary-number-of-battery-electric">
      https://www.statista.com/statistics/1188385/hungary-number-of-battery-electric
     </xref>.</p>
    <fig id="fig7" position="float">
     <label>Figure 7</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 7. Error distribution [Source: Own elaborations based on Statista using Python, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-https://www.statista.com/statistics/1188385/hungary-number-of-battery-electric">
        https://www.statista.com/statistics/1188385/hungary-number-of-battery-electric
       </xref>].</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2361412-rId48.jpeg?20240710115557" />
    </fig>
    <p>As shown in the histogram in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">
      Figure 7
     </xref>, the error distribution formed symmetric and bell-shaped, suggesting that the error in the forecasting model is likely to be normally distributed.</p>
    <p>Seasonality is a crucial assumption in time series analysis, which suggests that there are periodic patterns in data at regular intervals. Such patterns can affect the reliability of forecasts generated by SES. Hence, it is necessary to detect and address seasonality to enhance forecasting accuracy. This can be achieved by studying the data for repetitive patterns and making adjustments in the forecasting model accordingly.</p>
    <p>According to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">
      Figure 8
     </xref>, the residual plot shows that there is no trend or cyclical behavior in the pattern, which suggest a lack of seasonality. Moreover, the ACF plot is used to analyze the correlation between the observations in a time series at different lags. If the ACF plot shows no significant correlation beyond the first lag, it indicates the lack of seasonality in the data. However, if there is a significant correlation after the first lag suggests the presence of seasonality in the data. Thus, when both the residuals plot and ACF plot exhibit no pattern or significant correlation beyond the first lag as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">
      Figure 9
     </xref>, it can be concluded that the assumption of absence of seasonality is valid and the model is appropriate for forecasting purposes.</p>
    <fig id="fig8" position="float">
     <label>Figure 8</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 8. Residuals Plot [Source: Own elaborations based on Statista using Python, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-https://www.statista.com/statistics/1188385/hungary-number-of-battery-electric">
        https://www.statista.com/statistics/1188385/hungary-number-of-battery-electric
       </xref>].</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2361412-rId50.jpeg?20240710115558" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig9" position="float">
     <label>Figure 9</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 9. Autocorrelation Function (ACF) Residuals plot.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2361412-rId52.jpeg?20240710115557" />
    </fig>
    <p>Actual vs predicted refers to comparing the actual or observed values of a target variable with the predicted values of the same variable using a model. The purpose of this comparison is to evaluate the accuracy and performance of the model. In other words, the closer the predicted values are to the actual values, the more accurate the model is considered to be. This information can be used to make predictions or decisions based on the data.</p>
    <fig id="fig10" position="float">
     <label>Figure 10</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 10. Actual vs Predicted [Source: Own elaborations based on Statista using Python, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-https://www.statista.com/statistics/1188385/hungary-number-of-battery-electric">
        https://www.statista.com/statistics/1188385/hungary-number-of-battery-electric
       </xref>].</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2361412-rId53.jpeg?20240710115558" />
    </fig>
    <p>The actual vs predicted graph shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig10">
      Figure 10
     </xref> shows two lines: one representing the actual values of vehicles over the years and the other representing the predicted values of vehicles using the SES method. The plot shows that the predicted values are close to the actual values, but there are some differences between them. The actual values show an increasing trend over the years, and the predicted values follow this trend but with some fluctuations.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_3">
    <title>4.3. Predicted Number of BEVs over the Next Seven Years along with the Amount of CO<sub>2</sub> to Be Reduced in g/km in Hungary</title>
    <p>The graphs below represent the forecasted number of BEVs over the next 7 years, and the amount of CO<sub>2</sub> will be reduced, and the amount of CO<sub>2</sub> reduced in g/km based on the SES time series analysis performed in this study. The SES time series analysis forecast was developed based on data retrieved from Stata. Conversely, the amount of CO<sub>2</sub> will be produced and reduced was estimated using the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-13">
      Gimbert (2022)
     </xref> tool.</p>
    <p>Based on the time series analysis done in this study, the number of BEVs from 2023 to 2030 is predicted. According to the forecasting graph above, shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11">
      Figure 11
     </xref>, the number of BEVs in Hungary will reach 26,974 by 2023. Furthermore, the number of BEVs in 2024 will be 35,148. The number of BEVs is expected to reach 43,322 by 2025. In 2026, 51,496 new BEVs are expected to be on the road. Furthermore, the number of BEVs is expected to reach 67,844 by 2028. While 67,844 new BEVs are expected in 2029, 84,192 new BEVs are expected in 2030.</p>
    <fig id="fig11" position="float">
     <label>Figure 11</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 11. Forecasted number of BEVs in Hungary over the next 8 years [Source: Own elaborations based on Statista using R-studio, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-https://www.statista.com/statistics/1188385/hungary-number-of-battery-electric">
        https://www.statista.com/statistics/1188385/hungary-number-of-battery-electric
       </xref>].</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2361412-rId55.jpeg?20240710115558" />
    </fig>
    <fig id="fig12" position="float">
     <label>Figure 12</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 12. CO<sub>2</sub> emissions g/km of BEVs/ Diesel vehicles, Gasoline vehicles, PHEVs, and HEVs in case of the same number of BEVs predicted between 2023 and 2030, and BEVs estimated CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reduction in Hungary [Source: Own elaborations based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-13">
        Gimbert (2022)
       </xref> tool].</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2361412-rId57.jpeg?20240710115559" />
    </fig>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig12">
      Figure 12
     </xref> clearly illustrates the predicted CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in g/km of BEVs, Diesel vehicles, Gasoline vehicles, PHEVs, and HEVs for each year from 2023 to 2030 based on the predicted numbers of BEVs for the next 8 years in Hungary. The graph compares the CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in grams per kilometer of different energy source vehicles in the case of the same number of BEVs predicted each year to estimate and compare the CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and reduction in grams per kilometer by BEVs each year in comparison to other widely used energy vehicle types.</p>
    <p>According to the time series forecast in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11">
      Figure 11
     </xref>, the number of BEVs in Hungary in 2023 will reach 26974, with expected CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of 2,203,050 g/km, indicating an average CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reduction of 4,477,684 g/km in comparison to gasoline, diesel, HEVs, PHEVs in the case of the same number of vehicles.</p>
    <p>Moreover, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig11">
      Figure 11
     </xref> shows that in 2024 the number of BEVs will increase to 35,148, with expected CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of 2,636,100 g/km and an average CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reduction of 5,834,568 g/km compared to gasoline, diesel, HEVs, and PHEVs in the case of the same number of vehicles.</p>
    <p>In 2025 the number of BEVs in Hungary is expected to increase to 43,322, with estimated CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of 3,249,150 g/km, indicating an average of 7,191,452 g/km of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reduction compared to gasoline, diesel, HEVs, and PHEVs in the case of the same number of vehicles.</p>
    <p>Furthermore, the number of BEVs in Hungary is expected to reach 51,496 in 2026, with expected CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of 3,862,200 g/km and an average CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reduction of 8,548,336 g/km compared to gasoline, diesel, HEVs, and PHEVs in the case of the same number of vehicles.</p>
    <p>In 2027 the number of BEVs in Hungary is expected to increase to 59,670, with estimated CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of 4,475,250 g/km, indicating an average of 9,905,220 g/km of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reduction compared to the same number of Gasoline vehicles.</p>
    <p>The number of BEVs in Hungary is expected to reach 67,844 by 2028, with estimated CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of 5,088,300 g/km and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reduction of 11,262,104 g/km compared to gasoline, diesel, HEVs, PHEVs in the case of the same number of vehicles.</p>
    <p>In 2029 the number of BEVs in Hungary is expected to reach 76,018, with expected CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of 570,135 g/km, indicating an average 12,618,988 g/km of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reduction compared to gasoline, diesel, HEVs, and PHEVs in the case of the same number of vehicles.</p>
    <p>Finally, the number of BEVs in Hungary is expected to increase to 84,192 by 2030, with estimated CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of 6,314,400 g/km and CO<sub>2</sub> average emissions reduction of 13,975,872 g/km compared to gasoline, diesel, HEVs, and PHEVs in the case of the same number of vehicles.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_4">
    <title>4.4. Comparative Analysis with Existing Studies</title>
    <p>The findings from this case study in Hungary align with several previous studies that have demonstrated the potential for battery electric vehicles (BEVs) to reduce CO<sub>2</sub> emissions compared to conventional gasoline and diesel vehicles. Our time series analysis predicts that the number of BEVs in Hungary will reach 84,192 by 2030, resulting in an estimated reduction of up to 13,975,872 g/km of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions compared to an equivalent number of gasoline, diesel, hybrid, and plug-in hybrid vehicles. This significant reduction is consistent with the 68.88% lower CO<sub>2</sub> emissions for BEVs reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-5">
      Doucette and McCulloch (2011)
     </xref> in their study in China. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-14">
      Hofmann et al. (2016)
     </xref> found BEVs could lower CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by 25% in China, while our estimated reduction for Hungary is even higher at around 62.4% less than plug-in hybrid vehicles by 2030. The CO<sub>2</sub> reduction potential aligns with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-3">
      Casals et al. (2016)
     </xref>, who highlighted BEVs’ ability to decrease emissions in densely populated European regions like Hungary’s capital Budapest.</p>
    <p>However, our projected BEV growth rate of 2.21% from 2022 to 2030 is relatively modest compared to some countries. For instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-22">
      Mishina and Muromachi (2017)
     </xref> estimated higher future CO<sub>2</sub> reductions from BEV growth in Japan. This discrepancy could be attributed to differences in government policies, incentives, and infrastructure development for EVs between Hungary and other nations. Nonetheless, our findings underscore the importance of increasing BEV adoption as a viable strategy for Hungary to achieve its climate goals and align with the European Union’s emission reduction targets outlined in its long-term strategy.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Findings</title>
   <p>The transition to Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) presents a significant opportunity for Hungary to reduce carbon emissions and improve air quality within its transportation sector. Analyzing data up to 2022 and employing forecasting techniques, it is evident that BEVs are poised for substantial growth in the coming years. This growth trajectory underscores the importance of policy interventions aimed at promoting BEV adoption, particularly those focused on cost reduction.</p>
   <p>As of 2022, BEVs accounted for a mere 0.4% of Hungary’s total registered passenger cars, with 18,800 BEVs among a total of 3.8 million registered vehicles. Despite their low penetration, BEVs have exhibited remarkable growth, increasing from a mere 405 in 2016. Simple Exponential Smoothing (SES) forecasts project a promising future, estimating that the number of BEVs in Hungary will reach 84,192 by 2030, signifying a substantial increase over the next eight years.</p>
   <p>The Hungarian Ministry of Innovation and Technology’s strategy to reduce BEV costs could catalyze a transformative shift. If successful in increasing BEV penetration to 10%, it could translate to 463,600 BEVs by 2030. This intervention holds the potential to significantly mitigate carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions, with an estimated reduction of 76,957,600 g/km compared to conventional gasoline, diesel, hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), and plug-in hybrid vehicles (PHEVs).</p>
   <p>The environmental benefits of BEVs are undeniable. Previous empirical studies have demonstrated that BEVs emit substantially lower levels of CO<sub>2</sub> compared to traditional fuel vehicles. With BEVs emitting only 75 g/km of CO<sub>2</sub>, while gasoline and diesel vehicles emit 241 g/km and 231 g/km respectively, the potential for emissions reduction is profound. Furthermore, BEVs offer the potential to decrease harmful emissions, particularly in densely populated urban areas, thereby improving overall air quality and public health outcomes.</p>
   <p>The findings underscore the critical role of BEVs in Hungary’s efforts to transition towards a sustainable and environmentally conscious transportation system. The projected growth of BEVs presents a significant opportunity for reducing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and improving air quality. Policy interventions aimed at reducing the cost barriers associated with BEVs are essential to unlocking their full potential. By fostering an enabling environment for BEV adoption, Hungary can accelerate its progress towards achieving its climate and environmental sustainability goals while fostering innovation and economic growth in the automotive sector.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>6. Conclusion</title>
   <p>The assessment of data collected from stata.com has revealed that the number of battery-electric vehicles (BEVs) in Hungary has been on the rise, reaching 18,800 in 2022. This represents 0.4% of the total number of registered passenger cars in Hungary, which stands at 3.8 million, as reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132975-28">
     Statista (2023)
    </xref>. However, a time series forecast using the SES method has projected that the number of BEVs in Hungary will reach 84,192 by 2030, indicating a percentage increase of 2.21% over the next eight years. While this rate of increase is modest, it is a positive start.</p>
   <p>Further progress can be made with the help of the Hungarian Ministry of Innovation and Technology, whose seventh pillar strategy aims to reduce the cost of BEVs to make them more affordable for people. If successful, this initiative could result in a 10% increase in the percentage of BEVs, bringing the number of BEVs in Hungary to 463,600. Such a development would have a significant impact on the environment, reducing up to 76,957,600 g/km of CO<sub>2</sub> compared to an equivalent number of other fuel-type vehicles.</p>
   <p>If more serious efforts are made in Hungary to increase the adoption of BEVs, the number of BEVs could increase two, three, or even four times, assisting in controlling at least 25% of this social-environmental phenomenon that has a negative impact on the entire society.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     ACEA (2022). Fuel Types of New Cars: Battery Electric 9.9%, Hybrid 22.6% and Petrol 38.5% Market Share in Q2 2022. &gt;https://www.acea.auto/fuel-pc/fuel-types-of-new-cars-battery-electric-9-9-hybrid-22-6-and-petrol-38-5-market-share-in-q2-2022/ 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Brown, R. G. (1956). Exponential Smoothing for Predicting Demand. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 7, 35-42.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Casals, L. C., Martinez-Laserna, E., García, B. A.,&amp;Nieto, N. (2016). Sustainability Analysis of the Electric Vehicle Use in Europe for CO
     <sub>2</sub> Emissions Reduction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 127, 425-437. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.120
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dong, K., Dong, X.,&amp;Jiang, Q. (2020). How Renewable Energy Consumption Lower Global CO
     <sub>2</sub> Emissions? Evidence from Countries with Different Income Levels. The World Economy, 43, 1665-1698. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12898
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Doucette, R. T.,&amp;McCulloch, M. D. (2011). Modeling the Prospects of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles to Reduce CO
     <sub>2</sub> Emissions. Applied Energy, 88, 2315-2323. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.01.045
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     EC (2017). Commission Staff Working Document ‘Impact Assessment Accompanying the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament 279 and of the Council Setting Emission Performance Standards for New Passenger Cars and for New Light Commercial Vehicles as Part of the Union’s Integrated Approach to Reduce CO
     <sub>2</sub> Emissions from Light Duty Vehicles and Amending Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 (recast).
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     EEA (2018). Electric Vehicles as a Proportion of the Total Fleet (IND 108). European Environment Agency.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     EEA (2021). European Environment Agency.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     EP (2022). CO
     <sub>2</sub> Emissions from Cars: Facts and Figures (Infographics). European Parliament. &gt;https://www.eureporter.co/environment/co
     <sub>2</sub>-emissions/2022/06/06/co
     <sub>2</sub>-emissions-from-cars-facts-and-figures-infographics/
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     European Environment Agency (2022). Total Green House Gas Emission Trends Projections in Europe. &gt;https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/greenhouse-gas-emission-trends-6/assessment-3 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fritz, M., Plötz, P.,&amp;Funke, S. A. (2019). The Impact of Ambitious Fuel Economy Standards on the Market Uptake of Electric Vehicles and Specific CO
     <sub>2</sub> Emissions. Energy Policy, 135, Article 111006. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111006
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fuinhas, J. A., Koengkan, M.,&amp;Santiago, R. (2021). Physical Capital Development and Energy Transition in Latin America and the Caribbean (pp. 1-224). Elsevier. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/C2020-0-01491-X 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gimbert, Y. (2022). How Clean Are Electric Cars? Transport&amp;Environment. &gt;https://www.transportenvironment.org/discover/how-clean-are-electric-cars/ 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hofmann, J., Guan, D., Chalvatzis, K.,&amp;Huo, H. (2016). Assessment of Electrical Vehicles as a Successful Driver for Reducing CO
     <sub>2</sub> Emissions in China. Applied Energy, 184, 995-1003. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.042
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hungarian Ministry of Innovation and Technology (2020). Climate and Nature Protection Action Plan Consists of Eight Points. &gt;https://2015-2019.kormany.hu/en/ministry-for-innovation-and-technology/news/climate-and-nature-protection-action-plan-consists-of-eight-points 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kane, M. (2022). Germany: Plug-In Car Sales Continue to Decrease in June 2022. INSIDEEVs. &gt;https://insideevs.com/news/597927/germany-plugin-car-sales-june2022/ 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kawase, R., Matsuoka, Y.,&amp;Fujino, J. (2006). Decomposition Analysis of CO
     <sub>2</sub> Emissions in Long Term Climate Stabilization Scenarios. Energy Policy, 34, 2113-2122. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.02.005
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Küfeoğlu, S.,&amp;Hong, D. K. K. (2020). Emissions Performance of Electric Vehicles: A Case Study from the United Kingdom. Applied Energy, 260, Article 114241. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114241
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lomborg, B. (2013). Green Cars Have A Dirty Little Secret. The Wall Street Journal.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Magazzino, C., Mele, M., Schneider, N.,&amp;Sarkodie, S. A. (2021). Waste Generation, Wealth and GHG Emissions from the Waste Sector: Is Denmark on the Path towards Circular Economy? Science of the Total Environment, 755, Article 142510. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142510
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Medve, F. (2022). Number of Battery Electric Vehicles (BEV) in Hungary from 2016 to 2022. &gt;https://www.statista.com/statistics/1188385/hungary-number-of-battery-electric-vehicles/
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mishina, Y.,&amp;Muromachi, Y. (2017). Are Potential Reductions in CO
     <sub>2</sub> Emissions via Hybrid Electric Vehicles Actualized in Real Traffic? The Case of Japan. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 50, 372-384. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.11.019
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     NEA (2021). Smart and Sustainable Mobility Market in Hungary. Netherlands Enterprise Agency, Deloitte, RVO-072-2021/RP-INT.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Pažun, B., Raketić, O.,&amp;Rašević, I. (2019). Electric Cars—Are They the Best Solution for Sustainable Development? In Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific Conference on Circular and Bioeconomy “CIBEK 2019”.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Plötz, P., Funke, S. Á.,&amp;Jochem, P. (2018). Empirical Fuel Consumption and CO
     <sub>2</sub> Emissions of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 22, 773-784. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12623
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rauf, A., Zhang, J., Li, J.,&amp;Amin, W. (2018). Structural Changes, Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions in China: Empirical Evidence from ARDL Bound Testing Model. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 47, 194-206. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2018.08.010
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sarkodie, S. A.,&amp;Adams, S. (2020). Electricity Access and Income Inequality in South Africa: Evidence from Bayesian and NARDL Analyses. Energy Strategy Reviews, 29, Article 100480. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100480
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Statista (2023). &gt;https://www.statista.com/statistics/1188385/hungary-number-of-battery-electric 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Warsame, A. A., Sheik-Ali, I. A., Ali, A. O.,&amp;Sarkodie, S. A. (2021). Climate Change and Crop Production Nexus in Somalia: An Empirical Evidence from ARDL Technique. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 19838-19850. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11739-3
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Xu, B.,&amp;Lin, B. (2018). Investigating the Differences in CO
     <sub>2</sub> Emissions in the Transport Sector across Chinese Provinces: Evidence from a Quantile Regression Model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 109-122. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.022
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.132975-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Xu, B., Sharif, A., Shahbaz, M.,&amp;Dong, K. (2021). Have Electric Vehicles Effectively Addressed CO
     <sub>2</sub> Emissions? Analysis of Eight Leading Countries Using Quantile-on-Quantile Regression Approach. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1205-1214. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.002
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>