The DIVA 3D virtual dissection table (see Figures 1-3) is an educational tool

combining the 3D reconstruction of the entire body of a 33-year-old Korean man and that of a 25-year-old woman who donated their bodies to science. It was designed at the clinical and digital anatomy laboratory in Paris.

It includes a monitor with multi-point touch frame, a monitor stand on wheels, a Mac mini 8G computer, mounting bracket and connectors and an interactive atlas software suite for men and women (Acrobat 3DPDF files).

This was a cross-sectional and qualitative study. It was carried out from November 1 to December 30, 2023 in the morphological and clinical anatomy laboratory of the Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology (FMOS) of the University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (USTTB).

The target population was composed of students from the Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology of the University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako.

The source population consisted of students enrolled in the second year of medicine at the Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology at the University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako.

Students enrolled in the second year of medicine at the USTTB FMOS were included in this study, having participated in the practical and supervised work sessions and having completely completed the survey sheets.

Students from other FMOS promotions and those from the Faculty of Pharmacy were not included in this study.

Students in the second year of medicine who did not participate in the practical and supervised work sessions and who did not completely complete the survey form were excluded from the study.

We used several variables during our study. The main variables were the advantages of the DIVA 3D virtual dissection table and the limitations of the DIVA 3D virtual dissection table.

The advantages of the DIVA 3D dissection table were judged on the following variables: ease of use of the virtual dissection table, simplicity of the interface of the virtual dissection table and graphic quality of the virtual dissection table DIVA 3D.

The limitations of the DIVA 3D virtual dissection table were judged on the criticisms made by the students against the dissection table, the addition and removal of features to the virtual dissection table proposed by the students and the overall satisfaction level of the students.

The sampling was exhaustive. These were students from the second year of the Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology of the University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako.

The sample size was the number of students enrolled in the second year of medicine. After studying the survey sheets and checking student participation in the practical and tutorial sessions, we retained 130 students.

A standardized questionnaire inspired by several national and international questionnaires on evaluations of educational materials and on opinion surveys was used. This tool was tested and adapted before data collection.

The team was made up of two investigators responsible for explaining the questionnaires to students, monitoring and verifying the completeness of the data. The questionnaires were completed by the students just after the cadaveric and virtual dissection sessions in the anatomy laboratory.

A pretest was carried out on a sample of ten students before the start of the survey and adjustments were made. A finalization at the end of the practical and supervised work was done within the data collection team.

Data analysis was carried out with R.4.0.4 software. The tables and figures were produced with Microsoft Office Word and Excel version 2016 software. The medians were presented with their interquartile ranges and the proportions with their confidence intervals.

Ethical considerations

Informed and free consent from each student subjected to the study was obtained. Students were informed of the confidentiality of the data collected. The data was processed anonymously. The protocol was approved by the Director of the anatomy laboratory of the Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology of the University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako.

We surveyed 130 students enrolled in the second year of medicine on the contribution of the DIVA 3D virtual dissection table to the teaching of anatomy (Figures 4-6).

The average age was 22 ± 0.2 years with extremes of 17 and 29 years.

The sex ratio was 1.9.

The cadaver dissection was carried out by 51 participants or 39.2.

Among the 51 participants who had already performed cadaveric dissection, 60.8% were favorable to the practice of cadaveric dissection and 15.4% were very favorable.

In the study, 43 participants had already used virtual dissection software/application, i.e. 33.1%. The main software/applications used were Anatomie 3D (41.9%), Atlas (27.9%). Smartphones were the medium of use in 83.7% (Figure 9).

Compared to the appreciation of the DIVA3D virtual dissection table, 94.6% of participants found it easy with an average of 7.82 ± 1.4; 95.4% found the interface easy to use (average = 7.90 ± 1.6); a good quality graph (mean ± SD = 8.40 ± 1.4); 93.8% found good anatomical accuracy (mean ± SD = 8.30 ± 1.6); the quiz was well rated by 87.7% (mean ± SD = 8.0 ± 2.0). The overall assessment was well rated by 99.3% of participants with a mean ± SD = 9.0 ± 1.2.

Thirty-six participants (27.7%) expressed criticism against the DIVA 3D virtual dissection table.

The questionnaire was administered by the practical and supervised work supervisors. This would likely have influenced the students’ response.

The study of anatomy is one of the most important steps in the education of medicine and health sciences [5] . Anatomy is difficult for students to learn because teaching is based on visualization and memory [6] . It is generally accepted that teaching on models and cadavers is carried out in the laboratory alongside theoretical teaching in the classroom [7] . Although cadaver dissection is an integral part of anatomy education, some medical schools prefer not to use them for ethical reasons [8] . In countries where cadaver donations are rare [9] , the teaching of anatomy through dissection is not practiced and relies solely on models.

During our survey, 60.8% of second year medical students had not previously performed cadaver dissection. This rate could be explained by the fact that there is no practical and supervised work in the first year of medicine; this is because of the overabundance of more than 3000 first-year students.

With technological advancement, the use of smartphones, tablets and computers has become habitual. Great effort has been made to find innovative methods to create, visualize and animate high-quality content to aid learning. These innovative methods then speak of content personalization, content interaction and movement, as well as immersion or intuitive learning [10] . Students at the Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology in Bamako do not benefit greatly from this technological advance. In fact, only 43 students (33.1%) out of 130 used this technology to learn anatomy. This rate is lower than that reported by Jaffar who found that 98% of students used YouTube as an online platform and this increased their success in anatomy tests by 9%.

The low rate of use of virtual dissection by students at the Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology of Bamako could be explained by the accessibility of connections.

Despite this low rate of use of virtual dissection, 97.7% of students wanted to replace cadaveric dissection with the DIVA 3D virtual dissection table.

Their wish could be explained by their overall appreciation of the DIVA 3 virtual dissection table. Indeed, 94.6% of students found that the DIVA 3D virtual dissection table was easy to use and 95.4% found it Simple to use interface. In addition to these benefits, students rated the anatomical accuracy of the DIVA 3D virtual dissection table at 93.8%. Their overall appreciation of the DIVA 3D virtual dissection table was 99.3%.

However, 13.8% of students found it slow and 1.6% found it difficult to operate. Thus, 12.8% suggested the integration of dissection videos into the DIVA 3D virtual dissection table and 0.8% proposed the addition of anatomical variations. We believe that these suggestions made by students should be taken into account in order to improve the DIVA 3D virtual dissection table.

This new version should aim to be at least equal to the Anatomage table [11] (see Figure 11), a human-scale table allowing interaction with an annotated 3D anatomical model. By using a virtual scalpel and cutting planes, this table makes it possible to isolate anatomical structures and navigate between more or less deep anatomical layers. The model used can be changed depending on educational needs (e.g.: Female model, male model, model with specific health conditions, etc.). The virtual allows the use of an infinite model and allows us to be confronted with varied or even very rare cases.

The literature described a human anatomy teaching (HAE) channel on YouTube to support visualization in anatomy classes with videos, and showed that 98% of students used YouTube as an online information source. The authors said YouTube videos should be included in anatomy teaching [12] .

The increase in digital literature and students’ interest in digital technologies has attracted the attention of researchers. A study showed that teaching digital anatomy could be usefully combined with traditional methods. The authors also believe that teaching digital anatomy combined with traditional teaching is the best alternative [13] . In a SWOT analysis of teaching digital anatomy, the section

on opportunities indicated that digital teaching materials are accessible at any time, open to updating and innovation, and that teaching of Anatomy becomes more interesting with technology [14] . Another study used a blended learning approach including pre-recorded dissection videos, offline cadaver dissection, and 3D anatomy applications. It showed that the best alternative for teaching anatomy is a mixture of 3D and video-assisted education [15] . In our study, we did not compare anatomical dissection by the DIVA 3D virtual dissection table with traditional cadaveric dissection, we wanted to separately study the advantages and limitations of the DIVA 3D virtual dissection table according to the opinions of the students. Some research has produced a free mobile phone application (Qlone) in response to the cost of 3D technology used in online courses. In this study, 53 bones were scanned and converted into 3D software.

A study comparing 3D anatomy teaching with traditional methods used three different approaches: computer-assisted 3D, 3D augmented reality, and 3D virtual reality. The successes of these approaches have been ranked as follows: computer-assisted reality is superior to the augmented-assisted 3D method which is superior to the traditional method.

Other studies [16] indicated that 3D teaching should be included in current anatomy teaching.