<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JBBS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-5866</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jbbs.2024.144009</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JBBS-132797</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Electroencephalogram Signal Correlations between Default Mode Network and Attentional Functioning
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Moemi</surname><given-names>Matsuo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Takashi</surname><given-names>Higuchi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Toranosuke</surname><given-names>Abe</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Takuya</surname><given-names>Ishibashi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ayano</surname><given-names>Egashira</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rio</surname><given-names>Kamashita</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Research Center for Child Mental Development, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Physical Therapy, Osaka University of Human Sciences, Settsu, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Nishi Kyushu University, Kanzaki, Japan</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>26</day><month>04</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>119</fpage><lpage>134</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>14,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2024</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>25,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>28,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Attentional issues may affect acquiring new information, task performance, and learning. Cortical network activities change during different functional brain states, including the default mode network (DMN) and attention network. We investigated the neural mechanisms underlying attentional functions and correlations between DMN connectivity and attentional function using the Trail-Making Test (TMT)-A and -B. Electroencephalography recordings were performed by placing 19 scalp electrodes per the 10 - 20 system. The mean power level was calculated for each rest and task condition. Non-parametric Spearman&amp;#8217;s rank correlation was used to examine the correlation in power levels between the rest and TMT conditions. The most significant correlations during TMT-A were observed in the high gamma wave, followed by theta and beta waves, indicating that most correlations were in the parietal lobe, followed by the frontal, central, and temporal lobes. The most significant correlations during TMT-B were observed in the beta wave, followed by the high and low gamma waves, indicating that most correlations were in the temporal lobe, followed by the parietal, frontal, and central lobes. Frontoparietal beta and gamma waves in the DMN may represent attentional functions.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Cortical Network Activities</kwd><kwd> Electroencephalography</kwd><kwd> Attention</kwd><kwd> Default Mode Network</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Associations between default mode network (DMN) connectivity and attentional functions are still unknown in developmental disorders [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref1">1</xref>] , cerebral disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref2">2</xref>] , and brain injuries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref3">3</xref>] . It is vital to understand changes in the brain’s neural network during attention to comprehend the development of attentional abilities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref4">4</xref>] . Electroencephalography (EEG) has shown great potential for studying brain activities such as cognition, memory, and emotion. It has become an essential measurement for assessing attention status. Thus, EEG signals may be crucial for understanding attentional functions. However, most experiments are time-consuming, and using EEG in daily clinical scenarios is difficult. We hypothesize that specific attentional functions can reflect distinctive EEG signals in particular brain areas.</p><p>Cognition refers to information processing in one’s brain, including the ability to judge and make decisions. Cognition encompasses various domains, including attention, memory, executive planning, insight, and problem-solving [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref5">5</xref>] . Attention is defined as choosing and concentrating on a specific stimulus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref6">6</xref>] . The cognitive process makes it possible to position oneself toward relevant stimuli and respond to them. Attention is not a single process but rather a group of sub-processes and can be divided into the following parts: arousal—our activation level and level of alertness, whether we are tired or energized; focused attention—our ability to focus attention on a stimulus; sustained attention—the ability to attend to a stimulus or activity over a long period; selective attention—the ability to attend to a specific stimulus or activity in the presence of other competing stimuli; alternating attention—the ability to change focus attention between two or more stimuli; and divided attention—the ability to attend different stimuli or attention at the same time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref7">7</xref>] . Attentional processes are conceptualized as a system of anatomical brain areas involving three specialized networks of alerting, orienting, and executive control; each relates to specified time-frequency oscillations through electrophysiological techniques [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref8">8</xref>] . Attention issues may affect the seamless acquisition of new information and consistent performance in learning and tasks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref9">9</xref>] . Attention control, the ability to focus on task-relevant information while blocking out irrelevant information, is crucial for completing tasks throughout development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref10">10</xref>] . Previous studies investigated the behavioral benefits of subjects regarding visuospatial selective attention [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref11">11</xref>] . Spatial attention helps us efficiently localize objects in cluttered environments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref12">12</xref>] . However, the neurodevelopment of attention control during tasks remains underexplored, particularly from an electrophysiological perspective [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref10">10</xref>] , and the neurophysiological characteristics of the brain are unclear [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Cerebral functions control learning processes, thoughts, and cognition, especially higher brain functions. Therefore, the evaluation of intensive cognitive training is usually based on neuropsychological tests and questionnaires [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref13">13</xref>] . Accurate evaluation of attentional functions is necessary to develop more effective treatments for attentional impairment. A highly accurate evaluation method needs to be developed to understand patients’ symptoms and scientifically prove the assessment evidence. EEG, an essential and widely utilized non-invasive technique for measuring the brain response to a given stimulus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref14">14</xref>] , can directly show changes in cerebral function or brain activity with millisecond functional accuracy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref15">15</xref>] and offer a promising approach to studying the development of attention or attention-related processes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref16">16</xref>] . It is sensitive, cost-effective, and demonstrates good temporal resolution. Its portable monitor provides valuable information with data from a brief examination for clinical assessment and other applications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref15">15</xref>] , and it has proven repeatability in all frequency bands [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref17">17</xref>] .</p><p>Cortical network activities include the DMN and attention network changes during various brain functional states, from task-positive to resting states [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref18">18</xref>] . For example, alpha-band activity associated with the thalamocortical default network has been related to relaxation states. In contrast, beta-band activity has been associated with increased vigilance, attention [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref18">18</xref>] , and non-spatially selective suppression during the saccade epoch related to motor preparation and execution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref19">19</xref>] . Theta and delta power are generally increased in wake-sleep transitions with reduced vigilance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref18">18</xref>] . Moreover, changes in EEG signals can help neurologists detect attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), which is a neurodevelopmental disorder that affects a person’s sleep, mood, anxiety, and learning [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref20">20</xref>] . Studies indicate that the brain connectivity patterns of children with ADHD with comorbid reading disability were more abnormal, which supports more disrupted cortical connectivity in the comorbid group [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref21">21</xref>] . As such, early diagnosis and timely medication can help individuals with ADHD perform daily tasks without difficulty. EEG signals can help neurologists detect attentional deficits, including ADHD, by examining their changes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref20">20</xref>] . One study indicated that increased right hemispheric resting-state EEG functional connectivity at high frequencies was correlated with poorer focused attention in patients with schizophrenia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref22">22</xref>] . Changes in DMN connectivity may serve as biomarkers for abnormal neurological conditions like mental illnesses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref24">24</xref>] . Moreover, the observed difference in the anterior DMN may provide a starting point to investigate further if and how motor learning relating to attentional functions may impact physiological and cognitive changes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref25">25</xref>] . DMN may play a role in the formation of these frequency band patterns [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref26">26</xref>] , particularly in how lateralized alpha power bands may be involved in attentional selection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref27">27</xref>] .</p><p>This study aimed to investigate the neural mechanisms underlying different attentional functions using EEG and to determine the possible correlation between their DMN connectivity and attentional functions. Further, we also aimed to learn basic brain mechanisms and detect attentional deficits by measuring the resting state using EEG. This study may contribute to simplifying the evaluation of attentional deficits by offering fresh perspectives on attentional impairments based on the quick evaluation of the DMN.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Participants</title><p>Twelve healthy young adults (seven women, five men; mean age: 21.3 &#177; 0.62 years) participated in the present study. All prospective participants received an explanation regarding the safety regulations related to this research work and were assured that none of their identifying information would be disclosed, following which all participants provided written informed consent for participation in the study. We obtained additional informed consent from all participants whose identifiable information was included in this study. None of the study participants had a history of major physical disorders, including neurological illness, brain injury, or psychiatric illnesses. This research was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nishi Kyushu University (approval No. 22EAB19) and conformed to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref28">28</xref>] and its later amendments.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Task</title><p>The Trail-Making Test (TMT) typically entails two forms. TMT Part A requires the participant to connect through lines sequentially, with 25 encircled numbers pseudo-randomly distributed on a sheet. TMT Part B requires participants to alternate between numbers and letters when connecting the different items in ascending order (for instance, 1, A, 2, B, etc.) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref29">29</xref>] . The tasks were continued until the participants completed them, and the task time was measured with a stopwatch.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Experimental Setup</title><p>The participants sat on a chair with a backrest in a silent room. They placed their forearms in a relaxed position on the table. They were instructed to carry out the TMT without any other movement, like head movement, to maintain the same posture as far as possible, and to remain silent throughout the experiment. Furthermore, they were asked to maintain the same posture, relax without thinking, and look at a cross fixed on a piece of paper in front of them during rest conditions.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Experimental Protocol</title><p>The experiment was performed with the two tasks consecutively executed with rests of 1 min in between (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). EEG measurements were recorded continuously using Polymate Pro MP6100 (Miyuki Giken, Tokyo, Japan). The skin was cleansed with alcohol, and the electrodes were mounted on an elastic cap with a holder. The 19 gold-coated active EEG electrodes were placed following the international 10 - 20 placement system (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Data Analysis</title><p>The EEG data were sampled at 1000 Hz and filtered from 1 - 60 Hz using a bandpass filter with a digital infinite impulse response filter (low end, 1 Hz; high end, 60 Hz), and those containing eye blinks or muscle movement artefacts were excluded. Power spectrum analysis was applied using the Electro Magnetic Source Estimation (EMSE) Data Editor (Cortech Solutions, Wilmington, NC).</p><p>Each electrode’s six EEG datasets (delta, theta, alpha, beta, low gamma, and high gamma) were calculated as 2 s of window duration with compression of measurement data according to the operating instructions of the EMSE Data Editor. The same window duration was used for the task and rest. Furthermore, &lt;4 Hz was categorized as a delta wave, 5 - 8 Hz as theta, 9 - 13 Hz as alpha, 14 - 30 Hz as beta, 31 - 50 Hz as low gamma, and &gt;50 Hz as high gamma, respectively according to the previous study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref30">30</xref>] . All participants’ data were averaged for each rest and task.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Statistical Analysis</title><p>The mean power level of all participants was calculated using each rest and task condition. The non-parametric Spearman’s rank correlation test was used to examine the correlation in power levels between the rest and TMT conditions. Considering the number of participants, we selected a method unaffected by outliers. The results are explained as the strength and direction of association between two ranked variables. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 20.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY). Statistical significance was set at correlations with a P-value &lt; 0.05.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>The superimposed form of the participants’ power spectrum is presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. Most of the wave power during rest and task is gathered between 0 and 100 Hz. The superimposed form of the participants’ power spectrum is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The correlations of EEG power levels between rest and Trail-Making Test (TMT)-A results are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The most significant correlations were observed in high gamma waves (18 electrodes), followed by theta (17 electrodes) and beta waves (16 electrodes). In the electrodes, the most correlations were observed in the parietal (Pz), followed by the frontal (Fp2, F3, F4, F7), central (C3, Cz), and temporal (T5) cortices. The correlations of EEG power levels between rest and TMT-B results are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. The most significant correlations were observed in beta waves (19 electrodes), followed by high (17 electrodes) and low gamma waves (14 electrodes). In the electrodes, the most correlations were observed in the temporal (T6) cortices, followed by the parietal (P3, Pz), frontal (F7), and central (Cz) cortices.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Over the past ten years, breakthroughs in computing innovation and central nervous system bioinformatics have driven significant advancements in brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref31">31</xref>] . EEG is frequently combined with BCIs, and the rhythms are categorized according to their frequency ranges [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref32">32</xref>] . In this EEG study, we investigated the neural mechanisms underlying different attentional functions and their possible correlations with DMN connectivity. The results revealed significant correlations in the parietal, central, and temporal cortices</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation of electroencephalography power levels between rest and Trail-Making Test-A</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Electrodes</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Delta</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Theta</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Alpha</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Beta</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Low gamma</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >High gamma</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(ρ)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fp1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.685*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.510</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.455</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.818**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.727**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.867**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fp2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.399</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.587*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.629*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.615*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.671*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.881**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.601*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.755**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.210</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.685*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.797**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.846**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.483</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.902**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.587*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.846**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.832**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.902**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.741**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.503</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.587*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.664*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.608*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.818**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.476</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.839**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.385</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.608*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.455</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.357</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.259</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.811**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.469</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.643*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.650*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.776**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.937**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.867**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.364</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.497</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.566</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.832**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.706*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.741**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.203</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.594*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.727**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.818**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.881**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.706*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.566</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.517</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.720**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.713**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.755**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.413</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.643*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.594*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.888**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.531</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.650*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.503</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.643*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.587*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.860**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.573</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.650*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.161</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.755**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.804**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.755**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.469</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.916**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.811**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.727**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.524</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.811**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.538</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.713**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.748**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.692*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.664*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.846**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.797**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.713**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.252</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.657*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.573</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.825**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fz</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.517</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.734**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.860**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.832**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.929**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cz</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.601*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.860**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.196</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.811**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.706*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.916**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pz</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.783**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.804**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.622*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.664*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.734**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.860**</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>**P &lt; 0.01, *P &lt; 0.05 by Spearman’s rank correlation.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation of electroencephalography power levels between rest and Trail-Making Test-B</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Electrodes</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Delta</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Theta</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Alpha</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Beta</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Low gamma</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >High gamma</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(ρ)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fp1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.147</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.455</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.755**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.741**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.748**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fp2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.112</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.154</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.168</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.769**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.629*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.951**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.231</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.545</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.133</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.762**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.713**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.713**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.413</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.566</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.469</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.783**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.643*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.874**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.175</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.280</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.531</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.790**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.748**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.783**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.538</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.601*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.636*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.420</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.140</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.329</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.643*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.846**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.825**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.839**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.713**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.413</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.601*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.720**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.483</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.189</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.483</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.252</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.804**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.664*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.664*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.294</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.706*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.406</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.713**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.476</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.776**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.399</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.594*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.147</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.727**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.776**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.832**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.266</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.357</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.545</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.692*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.538</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.909**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.084</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.559</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.629*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.776**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.846**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.497</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.783**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.399</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.643*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.524</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.629*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.308</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.427</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.056</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.832**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.629*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.650*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.636*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.776**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.671*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.629*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.797**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fz</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.182</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.692*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.098</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.720**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.545</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.769**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cz</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.462</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.853**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.720**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.587*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.706*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pz</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.273</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.783**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.182</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.790**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.769**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.811**</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>**P &lt; 0.01, *P &lt; 0.05 by Spearman’s rank correlation.</p><p>during TMT-A, where high gamma, theta, and beta waves were observed. Similarly, during TMT-B, the temporal, parietal, frontal, and central cortices showed correlations with beta, high gamma, and low gamma waves.</p><p>The increased power in the theta band (5 - 8 Hz) is considered a marker of the continuous focused attention required to perform a task [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref33">33</xref>] . Higher frontal theta power indicates stronger attentional engagement than other conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref35">35</xref>] . It represents challenges in allocating attention to a given task [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref36">36</xref>] . The alpha and theta band power correlations remained similarly high for both resting and test states [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref37">37</xref>] . Beta waves (31 - 50 Hz), however, are present during a steady state of the brain, which is considered an optimal state for learning and attention. Mid-frontal beta power predicts the outcome of combined and monotherapy treatments, albeit in different directions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref40">40</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref42">42</xref>] . Additionally, beta modulations have been shown to predict treatment effects in patients with ADHD [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref43">43</xref>] . Although some correlations were found in alpha waves in the present study, the other wave bands during the resting state were more representative of attentional functions. This may reflect task specificity.</p><p>Resting-state networks are characterized by a specific combination of neuronal oscillations in the alpha, beta, and gamma bands, which highly depend on the position of the network nodes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref44">44</xref>] . Particularly, the frequency-dependent connectivity profile between pairs of DMN nodes peaked at 9 - 11 Hz, indicating the alpha band [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref45">45</xref>] , and alpha oscillations correlated with DMN more than any other frequency band [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref46">46</xref>] . Additionally, higher synchronization of the gamma-band activity was found relating to resting-state networks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref47">47</xref>] . Inspecting this underlying rapid activity is paramount for assessing possible alterations related to specific brain disorders.</p><p>Functional connectivity at alpha, beta, and gamma frequencies is associated with visual processing, working memory, and motor suppression, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref48">48</xref>] . The results of EEG rhythm energy on the large-scale brain network showed that the energy in the high-frequency beta band was significantly higher in the visual network under states of decreased neural efficiency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref49">49</xref>] . Furthermore, other research has demonstrated that increased gamma-band activity and decreased alpha-band activity over posterior brain areas are associated with the allocation of attention [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref50">50</xref>] . Stimulus-induced narrow-band gamma oscillations in human EEG have been linked to attentional and memory mechanisms and can be considered abnormal neurological conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref51">51</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref52">52</xref>] . Overall, modulation of theta, alpha, beta, and gamma waves, representing attentional states, may also correlate with the DMN. These results indicate the possibility of detecting attentional deficits at rest.</p><p>Regarding brain regions, the attention tasks had a stronger correlation to right brain wave rhythms, with some cross-over to the left hemisphere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref52">52</xref>] . However, for alertness, the links were stronger on the left side [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref53">53</xref>] . The frontoparietal network might modulate the accuracy of visuospatial attention tasks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref54">54</xref>] . This form of alertness involves long-range interaction among the brain’s prefrontal cortex and posterior cortex [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref5">5</xref>] . The gamma band activity appears with the frontal midline, suggesting that it reflects the function of the prefrontal cortex in executing memory tasks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref55">55</xref>] . Therefore, beta and gamma waves of the frontoparietal regions in the DMN may represent attentional functions.</p><p>Additionally, event-related changes in alpha activity have been observed over primary sensory cortices during the allocation of spatial attention. These changes are particularly prominent during top-down or endogenous attention and nearly absent in bottom-up or exogenous orienting. Further, they are highly lateralized, such that an increase in alpha power is seen ipsilateral to the attended region of space, and a decrease is seen contralaterally [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132797-ref56">56</xref>] . Although previous studies suggested a correlation between the frontoparietal cortices and attentional functions during attentional tasks, the present study suggests the possibility of assessing attentional functions in the parietal, central, and temporal cortices during the resting state. However, the result may differ depending on the induced attentional functions.</p>Limitations<p>First, the participants were all healthy young adults; therefore, it is unclear whether our results are generalizable to older patients or those with neurological disabilities. Second, the attentional task was limited to the TMT; therefore, it is unclear whether brain waves during other attentional tasks are comparable with those observed during the TMT. Third, our sample size was small. Fourth, correction for line noise and local detrending could not be performed with our EEG machine; hence, we could not verify if noise caused by muscle movements, such as those associated with body movement and eye blinks were fully eliminated. Fifth, we analyzed individual electrodes. However, there were many correlations in the results. Thus, it might be better to average across multiple electrodes, such as the frontal, parietal, and occipital electrodes x theta, alpha, beta, and gamma powers. Future studies must be conducted with larger cohorts under various conditions, and brain waves need to be investigated during various attentional tasks. Moreover, more detailed statistical analyses are needed to validate these findings and classify the brain’s attentional functions in a larger number of participants. Indicating DMN connectivity under various brain rhythms is necessary to understand such correlations.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>We investigated the neural mechanisms underlying attentional functions and correlations between DMN connectivity and attentional function. The most significant correlations were observed in high gamma, theta, and beta waves in the parietal, central, and temporal cortices, respectively, during TMT-A and in beta, high gamma, and low gamma waves in the temporal, parietal, frontal, and central cortices during TMT-B. Theta, alpha, beta, and gamma waves of the frontoparietal regions in the DMN may represent attentional functions. Our findings expand the knowledge base of the DMN and provide a further understanding of the advantages of using EEG for evaluating attentional deficits in the DMN within a short period. The advantage of these findings is that the results may contribute to simplifying the method of measuring attentional functions using EEG.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors extend their gratitude to all the study participants.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Funding</title><p>This research received no external funding.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Institutional Review Board Statement</title><p>This research was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nishi Kyushu University (approval No. 22EAB19) and conformed to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (World Medical Association, 2013) and its later amendments.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Informed Consent Statement</title><p>All the participants provided written informed consent.</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Data Availability Statement</title><p>The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.</p></sec><sec id="s11"><title>Author Contributions</title><p>MM: conceptualization and methodology; TH: software, validation, and formal analysis; MM, TA, TI, and AE: investigation, resources, data curation, writing—original draft preparation; MM, and RK: writing—review and editing; MM: visualization and supervision; MM: project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s12"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s13"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Matsuo, M., Higuchi, T., Abe, T., Ishibashi, T., Egashira, A. and Kamashita, R. (2024) Electroencephalogram Signal Correlations between Default Mode Network and Attentional Functioning. Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science, 14, 119-134. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbbs.2024.144009</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.132797-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cong, J., Zhuang, W., Liu, Y., Yin, S., Jia, H., Yi, C., &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2023) Altered Default Mode Network Causal Connectivity Patterns in Autism Spectrum Disorder Revealed by Liang Information Flow Analysis. &lt;i&gt;Human Brain Mapping&lt;/i&gt;, 44, 2279-2293. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26209 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hu, S., Hao, Z., Li, M., Zhao, M., Wen, J., Gao, Y., &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2023) Resting-State Abnormalities in Functional Connectivity of the Default Mode Network in Migraine: A Meta-Analysis. &lt;i&gt;Frontiers in Neuroscience&lt;/i&gt;, 17, Article ID: 1136790. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1136790 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zheng, R.Z., Xu, C.X., Zhou, L.Y. and Feng, D.F. (2023) Default Mode Network Overshadow Executive Control Network in Coma Emergence and Awakening Prediction of Patients with sTBI. &lt;i&gt;Neuroimage. Clinical&lt;/i&gt;, 37, Article ID: 103361. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103361 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ma, H.L., Zeng, T.A., Jiang, L., Zhang, M., Li, H., Su, R., &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2023) Altered Resting-State Network Connectivity Patterns for Predicting Attentional Function in Deaf Individuals: An EEG Study. &lt;i&gt;Hearing Research&lt;/i&gt;, 429, Article ID: 108696. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2023.108696 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pendleton, H.M. and Schultz-Krohn, W. (2006) Pedretti&amp;#8217;s Occupational Therapy. 6th Edition, Mosby, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wu, W., Ling, B.W., Li, R., Lin, Z., Liu, Q., Shao, J., &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2023) Classification Approach for Attention Assessment via Singular Spectrum Analysis Based on Single-Channel Electroencephalograms. &lt;i&gt;Sensors &lt;/i&gt;(&lt;i&gt;Basel&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Switzerland&lt;/i&gt;), 23, Article No. 761. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/s23020761 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sohlberg, M. and Mateer, C.A. (2001) Cognitive Rehabilitation: An Integrative Neuropsychological Approach. 2nd Edition, Guilford Press, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duan, K., Xie, S., Zhang, X., Xie, X., Cui, Y., Liu, R., &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2023) Exploring the Temporal Patterns of Dynamic Information Flow during Attention Network Test (ANT). &lt;i&gt;Brain Sciences&lt;/i&gt;, 13, Article No. 247. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13020247 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nethertom, D.S., Holmes, D. and Walker, C.E. (1999) Child and Adolescent Psychological Disorders. Oxford University Press, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, J., Xiao, Y., Xu, B. and Zhang, D. (2023) The Developmental Trajectory of Task-Related Frontal EEG Theta/Beta Ratio in Childhood. &lt;i&gt;Developmental Cogn&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;i&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;tive Neuroscience&lt;/i&gt;, 60, Article ID: 101233. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101233 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, H., Xu, J., Sheng, J., Zhou, H., Liu, Z., Li, Y., &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2023) An EEG Study of the Influence of Target Appearing in the Upper and Lower Visual Fields on Brain Attention Resource Allocation. &lt;i&gt;Brain Sciences&lt;/i&gt;, 13, Article No. 433. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13030433 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Graumann, M., Wallenwein, L.A. and Cichy, R.M. (2023) Independent Spatiotemporal Effects of Spatial Attention and Background Clutter on Human Object Location Representations. &lt;i&gt;Neuroimage&lt;/i&gt;, 272, Article ID: 120053. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120053 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Markovic, G., Bartfai, A., Ekholm, J., Nilsson, C., Schult, M.L. and L&amp;#246;fgren, M. (2020) Daily Management of Attention Dysfunction Two-Four Years after Brain Injury and Early Cognitive Rehabilitation with Attention Process Training: A Qualitative Study. &lt;i&gt;Neuropsychological Rehabilitation&lt;/i&gt;, 30, 523-544. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2018.1482770 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, J., Pan, W., Huang, H., Pan, J. and Wang, (2023) F. STGATE: Spatial-Temporal Graph Attention Network with a Transformer Encoder for EEG-Based Emotion Recognition. &lt;i&gt;Frontiers in Human Neuroscience&lt;/i&gt;, 17, Article ID: 1169949. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1169949 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wu, J.J., Cui, Y., Yang, Y.S., Kang, M.S., Jung, S.C., Park, H.K., &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2014) Modulatory Effects of Aromatherapy Massage Intervention on Electroencephalogram, Psychological Assessments, Salivary Cortisol and Plasma Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor. &lt;i&gt;Complementary Therapies in Medicine&lt;/i&gt;, 22, 456-462. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2014.04.001 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morales, S., Bowers, M.E., Leach, S.C., Buzzell, G.A., McSweeney, M., Yoder, L., &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2023) Development of Auditory Change-Detection and Attentional Capture, and Their Relation to Inhibitory Control. &lt;i&gt;Psychophysiology&lt;/i&gt;, 60, e14211. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14211 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Domingos, C., Mar&amp;#244;co, J.L., Miranda, M., Silva, C., Melo, X. and Borrego, C. (2023) Repeatability of Brain Activity as Measured by a 32-Channel EEG System during Resistance Exercise in Healthy Young Adults. &lt;i&gt;International Journal of Enviro&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;mental Research and Public Health&lt;/i&gt;, 20, Article No. 1992. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031992 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nishida, K., Razavi, N., Jann, K., Yoshimura, M., Dierks, T., Kinoshita, T. and Koenig, T. (2015) Integrating Different Aspects of Resting Brain Activity: A Review of Electroencephalographic Signatures in Resting State Networks Derived from Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. &lt;i&gt;Neuropsychobiology&lt;/i&gt;, 71, 6-16. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1159/000363342 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sendhilnathan, N., Basu, D. and Murthy, A. (2017) Simultaneous Analysis of the LFP and Spiking Activity Reveals Essential Components of a Visuomotor Transformation in the Frontal Eye Field. &lt;i&gt;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; of America&lt;/i&gt;, 114, 6370-6375. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1703809114 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khare, S.K. and Acharya, U.R. (2023) An Explainable and Interpretable Model for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Children using EEG Signals. &lt;i&gt;Computers in Biology and Medicine&lt;/i&gt;, 155, Article ID: 106676. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106676 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tabiee, M., Azhdarloo, A. and Azhdarloo, M. (2023) Comparing Executive Functions in Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder with or without Reading Disability: A Resting-State EEG Study. &lt;i&gt;Brain and Behavior&lt;/i&gt;, 13, e2951. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2951 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yeh, T.C., Huang, C.C., Chung, Y.A., Park, S.Y., Im, J.J., Lin, Y.Y., &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2023) Resting-State EEG Connectivity at High-Frequency Bands and Attentional Performance Dysfunction in Stabilized Schizophrenia Patients. &lt;i&gt;Medicina &lt;/i&gt;(&lt;i&gt;Kaunas&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Lith&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;u&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;ania&lt;/i&gt;), 59, Article No. 737. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040737 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xue, C., Zhang, X., Cao, P., Yuan, Q., Liang, X., Zhang, D., &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2023) Evidence of Functional Abnormalities in the Default Mode Network in Bipolar Depression: A Coordinate-Based Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis. &lt;i&gt;Journal of A&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;f&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;fective Disorders&lt;/i&gt;, 326, 96-104. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2023.01.088 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nour, M.M., Liu, Y., Higgins, C., Woolrich, M.W. and Dolan, R.J. (2023) Reduced Coupling Between Offline Neural Replay Events and Default Mode Network Activation in Schizophrenia. &lt;i&gt;Brain Communications&lt;/i&gt;, 5, fcad056. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcad056 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gowik, J.K., Goelz, C., Vieluf, S., van den Bongard, F. and Reinsberger, C. (2023) Publisher Correction: Source Connectivity Patterns in the Default Mode Network Differ between Elderly Golf-Novices and Non-Golfers. &lt;i&gt;Scientific Rep&lt;/i&gt;orts, 13, Article No. 7336. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34581-2 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Goodale, S.E., Ahmed, N., Zhao, C., de Zwart, J.A., &amp;#214;zbay, P.S., Picchioni, D., &lt;i&gt;et al. &lt;/i&gt;(2021) fMRI-Based Detection of Alertness Predicts Behavioral Response Variability. &lt;i&gt;Elife&lt;/i&gt;, 10, e62376. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62376 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bacigalupo, F. and Luck, S.J. (2019) Lateralized Suppression of Alpha-Band EEG Activity as a Mechanism of Target Processing. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Neuroscience&lt;/i&gt;, 39, 900-917. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0183-18.2018 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">World Medical Association. (2013) World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. &lt;i&gt;JAMA&lt;/i&gt;, 310, 2191-2194. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vallesi, A. (2020) On the Utility of the Trail Making Test in Migraine with and without Aura: A Meta-Analysis. &lt;i&gt;The Journal of Headache and Pain&lt;/i&gt;, 21, Article No. 63. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01137-y </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Matsuo, M., Higuchi, T., Miyabara, H., Higashijima, M., Oshikawa, T., Nakamura, M&lt;i&gt;.&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; et al.&lt;/i&gt; (2023) Assessing Attentional Task-Related Electroencephalogram Signal Variations by Using Mobile Electroencephalogram Technology: An Experimental Study. &lt;i&gt;Medicine &lt;/i&gt;(&lt;i&gt;Baltimore&lt;/i&gt;), 102, e35801. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035801 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hossain, K.M., Islam, M.A., Hossain, S., Nijholt, A. and Ahad, M.A.R. (2022) Status of Deep Learning for EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interface Applications. &lt;i&gt;Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience&lt;/i&gt;, 16, Article ID: 1006763. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2022.1006763 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chang, W.Y., Lo, M.T. and Huang, C.F. (2019) The Influence of Emotional Environmental Pictures on Behavior Intentions: The Evidence of Neuroscience Technology. &lt;i&gt;International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health&lt;/i&gt;, 16, Article No. 5142. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16245142 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gevins, A., Smith, M.E., McEvoy, L. and Yu, D. (1997) High-Resolution EEG Mapping of Cortical Activation Related to Working Memory: Effects of Task Difficulty, Type of Processing, and Practice. &lt;i&gt;Cerebral Cortex&lt;/i&gt;, 7, 374-385. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/7.4.374 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meyer, M., van Schaik, J.E., Poli, F. and Hunnius, S. (2023) How Infant-Directed Actions Enhance Infants&amp;#8217; Attention, Learning, and Exploration: Evidence from EEG and Computational Modeling. &lt;i&gt;Developmental Science&lt;/i&gt;, 26, e13259. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13259 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Knyazev, G.G., Savostyanov, A.N. and Levin, E.A. (2006) Alpha Synchronization and Anxiety: Implications for Inhibition vs. Alertness Hypotheses. &lt;i&gt;International Journal of Psychophysiology&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;i&gt; Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology&lt;/i&gt;, 59, 151-158. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.03.025 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zivan, M., Vaknin, S., Peleg, N., Ackerman, R. and Horowitz-Kraus, T. (2023) Higher Theta-Beta Ratio during Screen-Based vs. Printed Paper Is Related to Lower Attention in Children: An EEG Study. &lt;i&gt;PLOS ONE&lt;/i&gt;, 18, e0283863. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283863 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, C., Fukuda, K. and Woodman, G.F. (2022) Cross-Frequency Coupling of Frontal Theta and Posterior Alpha Is Unrelated to the Fidelity of Visual Long-Term Memory Encoding. &lt;i&gt;Visual Cognition&lt;/i&gt;, 30, 379-392.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brandes-Aitken, A., Metser, M., Braren, S.H., Vogel, S.C. and Brito, N.H. (2023) Neurophysiology of Sustained Attention in Early Infancy: Investigating Longitudinal Relations with Recognition Memory Outcomes. &lt;i&gt;Infant Behavior &amp; Development&lt;/i&gt;, 70, Article ID: 101807. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2022.101807 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, S.C., Lee, M.H., Jang, C., Kwon, J.W. and Park, J.W. (2013) The Effect of Alpha Rhythm Sleep on EEG Activity and Individuals&amp;#8217; Attention. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Physical Therapy Science&lt;/i&gt;, 25, 1515-1518. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.25.1515 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fell, J., Axmacher, N. and Haupt, S. (2010) From Alpha to Gamma: Electrophysiological Correlates of Meditation-Related States of Consciousness. &lt;i&gt;Medical Hyp&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;o&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;theses&lt;/i&gt;, 75, 218-224. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2010.02.025 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zoefel, B., Huster, R.J. and Herrmann, C.S. (2011) Neurofeedback Training of the Upper Alpha Frequency Band in EEG Improves Cognitive Performance. &lt;i&gt;Neuro&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;I&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;mage.&lt;/i&gt; 54, 1427-1431. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.078 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Plamberger, C.P., Mayer, L.M., Klimesch, W., Gruber, W., Kerschbaum, H.H. and Hoedlmoser, K. (2023) Fronto-Parietal Alpha ERD and Visuo-Spatial Attention in Pregnant Women. &lt;i&gt;Brain Research&lt;/i&gt;, 1798, Article ID: 148130. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2022.148130 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Michelini, G., Lenartowicz, A., Vera, J.D., Bilder, R.M., McGough, J.J., McCracken, J.T., &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2023) Electrophysiological and Clinical Predictors of Methylphenidate, Guanfacine, and Combined Treatment Outcomes in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. &lt;i&gt;Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry&lt;/i&gt;, 62, 415-426. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2022.08.001 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Samogin, J., Marino, M., Porcaro, C., Wenderoth, N., Dupont, P., Swinnen, S. P., &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2020) Frequency-Dependent Functional Connectivity in Resting State Networks. &lt;i&gt;Human Brain Mapping&lt;/i&gt;, 41, 5187-5198. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25184 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Samogin, J., Liu, Q., Marino, M., Wenderoth, N. and Mantini, D. (2019) Shared and Connection-Specific Intrinsic Interactions in the Default Mode Network. &lt;i&gt;Neuro&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;I&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;mage&lt;/i&gt;, 200, 474-481. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.07.007 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marino, M., Arcara, G., Porcaro, C. and Mantini, D. (2019) Hemodynamic Correlates of Electrophysiological Activity in the Default Mode Network. &lt;i&gt;Frontiers in Neuroscience&lt;/i&gt;, 13, Article No. 1060. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01060 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marino, M., Liu, Q., Samogin, J., Tecchio, F., Cottone, C., Mantini, D., &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2019) Neuronal Dynamics Enable the Functional Differentiation of Resting State Networks in the Human Brain. &lt;i&gt;Human Brain Mapping&lt;/i&gt;, 40, 1445-1457. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24458 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aussel, A., Fiebelkorn, I.C., Kastner, S., Kopell, N.J. and Pittman-Polletta, B.R. (2023). Interacting Rhythms Enhance Sensitivity of Target Detection in a Fronto-Parietal Computational Model of Visual Attention. &lt;i&gt;eLife&lt;/i&gt;, 12, e67684. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67684 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, S., Lin, H., Chi, A. and Gao, Y. (2023) Effects of Acute Exercise Fatigue on the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Resting-State Large-Scale Brain Networks. &lt;i&gt;Frontiers in Neuroscience&lt;/i&gt;, 17, Article ID: 986368. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.986368 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Luther, L., Horschig, J.M., van Peer, J.M., Roelofs, K., Jensen, O. and Hagenaars, M.A. (2023) Oscillatory Brain Responses to Emotional Stimuli are Effects Related to Events Rather than States. &lt;i&gt;Frontiers in Human Neuroscience&lt;/i&gt;, 16, Article ID: 868549. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.868549 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pattisapu, S. and Ray, S. (2023) Stimulus-Induced Narrow-Band Gamma Oscillations in Humans Can Be Recorded Using Open-Hardware Low-Cost EEG Amplifier. &lt;i&gt;PLOS ONE&lt;/i&gt;, 18, e0279881. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279881 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wu, Z.M., Wang, P., Liu, J., Liu, L., Cao, X.L., Sun, L., &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2023) The Clinical, Neuropsychological, and Brain Functional Characteristics of the ADHD Restrictive Inattentive Presentation. &lt;i&gt;Frontiers in Psychiatry&lt;/i&gt;, 14, Article ID: 1099882. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1099882 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Klimesch, W., Sauseng, P. and Hanslmayr, S. (2007) EEG Alpha Oscillations: The Inhibition-Timing Hypothesis. &lt;i&gt;Brain Research Reviews&lt;/i&gt;, 53, 63-88. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.06.003 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, D., Hu, Y., Qi, M., Zhao, C., Jensen, O., Huang, J., &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2023) Prioritizing Flexible Working Memory Representations through Retrospective Attentional Strengthening. &lt;i&gt;NeuroImage.&lt;/i&gt; 269, Article ID: 119902. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.119902 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ueno, K., Ishii, R., Ueda, M., Yuri, T., Shiroma, C., Hata, M., &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2023) Frontal Midline Theta Rhythm and Gamma Activity Measured by Sheet-Type Wearable EEG Device. &lt;i&gt;Frontiers in Human Neuroscience&lt;/i&gt;, 17, Article ID: 1145282. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1145282 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132797-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silas, J., Jones, A., Yarrow, K. and Anderson, W. (2023) Spatial Attention Is Not Affected by Alpha or Beta Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation: A Registered Report. &lt;i&gt;Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Beh&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;vior&lt;/i&gt;, 164, 33-50. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2023.03.011</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>