<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JHEPGC</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2380-4327</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jhepgc.2024.102048</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JHEPGC-132601</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The GBR Hypothesis Revisited
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lewis</surname><given-names>Nash</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Marrietta, GA, USA</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>02</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>800</fpage><lpage>809</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>27,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>20,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>23,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The radical hypothesis concerning the physics of gravitational black-body radiation is placed on a more solid statistical mechanics foundation in this study. As the concepts and formalism in the former presentation are only partially developed and furthermore, suffer from an unfortunate misstep regarding Hawking radiation and the hypothetical gravitational black-body temperature of a parcel or distribution of energy; this paper aims to fill in some of the theoretical gaps in the derivation of the Planck radiation formula for gravity (or non-Euclidean space-time), and there by provide a more complete and transparent quantum theory of thermal gravitational radiation.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Gravitational Black Body</kwd><kwd> Gravitons</kwd><kwd> Thermal Gravitational Radiation</kwd><kwd> Spiral Galaxy</kwd><kwd> Rotation Curves</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>It is well known since the 1930s, that the observed rotational velocity of matter and energy in the outer arms of flat spiral (disk) galaxies, such as our own Milky Way Galaxy, is greater than that predicted by the inverse square law of Newton’s law of universal gravitation (1729). This mysterious phenomenon suggests, in general, that the observable energy<sup>1</sup> content of a flat spiral galaxy alone cannot be the total source of the gravitational force holding the massive system of stars, planets, gas, and dust together.</p><p>Generally, a parcel of energy produces a gravitational field. Hypothetical mass less quanta of a gravitational field are called gravitons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132601-ref1">1</xref>] , and their energy, similar to photons, which are quanta of an electromagnetic field<sup>2</sup>, generate packets of coherent oscillations within the Planck lattice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132601-ref3">3</xref>] . However, because gravitons are essentially particles of spacetime itself, then unlike photons, gravitons not only travel at the speed of light but also oscillate along with the internal oscillations of the Planck lattice. As is known from Maxwell’s work on electromagnetism, a moving electric charge radiates electromagnetic waves. Similarly, Einstein’s work on gravity showed that a moving gravitational charge radiates a gravitational wave. Thus, here we imagine the gravitational field of a parcel or distribution of energy to be composed of gravitons jiggling about, coupled to standing wave modes of non-Euclidean (curved) space-time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132601-ref4">4</xref>] . Suppose each standing wave mode of curved space-time is coupled to a harmonic oscillator of the Planck lattice which oscillates at the same frequency as corresponding the standing wave mode of curved space-time. Each oscillator has two degrees of freedom, one for kinetic energy and one for potential energy, so it has an average energy of k B T according to the equipartition theorem. In thermal equilibrium, the average energy of the Planck oscillators and the standing wave mode of curved space-time must be the same for the two to be in thermal equilibrium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132601-ref5">5</xref>] . Hence, each mode of oscillation of the gravitational field has an energy k B T and can be considered as having a temperature T, which is the basis of the Rayleigh-Jeans theory (1900) for the spectral radiance of electromagnetic radiation.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Rotation Curves of Spiral Galaxies</title><p>As in the case of oscillating electrons in a material radiating electromagnetic energy, we have oscillating gravitons radiating gravitational energy in a similar manner. Because oscillating gravitons increase the strength of a gravitational field, which in turn increases the frequency of graviton oscillations, the resulting strength (or energy) of any gravitational field should be infinite. However, this does not agree with observation. Therefore, we propose that the gravitational energy spectrum be discrete. In accordance with Planck’s law [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132601-ref6">6</xref>] , which has proven to be adequate thus far, we conjecture that for a given increase in the curvature of spacetime, the oscillation frequency of the gravitons may increase if the increase in the gravitational field energy is greater than or equal to the fundamental unit of energy, as defined by the Planck-Einstein relation, for that particular frequency. This assumption is essential to prevent the energy of the gravitational field from becoming infinite.</p><p>Now, we proceed under the general assumption that the gravitational field of any parcel or distribution of energy consists of a familiar classical Newtonian component g N that includes all forms of energy not made of space-time and a hypothetical gravitational radiation component g g r . Because the Planck lattice absorbs and re-emits all gravitational energy surrounding a parcel or distribution of energy with no reflection or scattering, space-time at the Planck scale is a perfect “gravitational” blackbody [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132601-ref7">7</xref>] . Analogous to electromagnetic black-body radiation, gravitational black-body radiation (GBR) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132601-ref8">8</xref>] is defined as thermal gravitational radiation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132601-ref9">9</xref>] surrounding a parcel or distribution of energy in thermodynamic equilibrium with the Planck lattice. The radiation component of the gravitational field is presumed to be vanishingly small, except in cases involving large distributions of energy like galaxies, or galaxy clusters. Therefore, the gravitational field of a parcel or distribution of energy is defined here by the following expression<sup>3</sup>:</p><p>g ≡ g N + g g r . (1)</p><p>Let us assume, in accordance with the virial theorem, that the thermal gravitational energy E g r of the spiral galaxy is equal to twice the difference in the rotational kinetic energy (for a solid disk) between the observed rotation speed and the theoretical Newtonian rotation speed. Thus,</p><p>E g r = M g r c 2 = 1 2 M N ( v 2 − v N 2 ) , (2)</p><p>where M N is the observable (or Newtonian) mass of the system, M g r is the relativistic mass of the thermal gravitational radiation, v is the observed rotation speed of the galaxy, and v N = G M N / r is the rotation speed of the galaxy, as predicted by Newton’s law of gravity for a distribution of energy. It follows from Equation (2) that the observed rotational velocity of the system is determined by</p><p>v = G M N r + 4 G M g r R S , (3)</p><p>where r is the radial distance from the center of rotation of the system and R S = 2 G M N / c 2 is the Schwarzschild radius of the gravitational source.</p><p>From the equation for circular motion, we obtain an expression for the gravitational acceleration, as follows:</p><p>g = v 2 r = G M N r 2 + 4 G M g r R S r .</p><p>Hence, from Equation (1) the Newtonian and gravitational radiation components of the gravitational field are, respectively:</p><p>g N = G M N r 2 and g g r = 4 G M g r R S r . (4)</p><p>Let us suppose the energy per graviton is</p><p>ϵ g r = h ν = h c / 2 r , (5)</p><p>where ν = c / λ and λ = 2 r is the fundamental (or zero-point) wavelength of the gravitational field [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132601-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132601-ref11">11</xref>] . The graviton energy can thus be written in terms of R as</p><p>ϵ g r = h c R 2 L , (6)</p><p>where R = 2 L / λ defines a radius in n-space [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132601-ref12">12</xref>] and L is the dimension of the gravitational potential well. The n-space associated with standing wave solutions involves only positive values of n, so the volume must be divided by 8. It then must be multiplied by 2 to account for the two polarization states of the graviton [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132601-ref13">13</xref>] . The number of states is then</p><p>N = ( 2 ) ( 1 8 ) ( 4 π 3 R 3 ) = 8 π 3 ( L r ) 3 .</p><p>The number of states per unit volume is</p><p>n s = N L 3 = 8 π 3 r 3 . (7)</p><p>From the assumption that the Planck oscillators are quantized in energy with the quantum of energy equal to Planck’s constant times the frequency, we shall develop a Planck radiation formula for gravity. The average energy per “mode” or “quantum” is the energy of the quantum E g r , n = n ϵ g r times the probability that it will be occupied [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132601-ref14">14</xref>]</p><p>p n = e n ϵ g r / k B T g r ∑ n = 0 ∞ e n ϵ g r / k B T g r .</p><p>In thermal equilibrium with the Planck oscillators, the average energy has the form</p><p>〈 E g r 〉 = ϵ g r e λ P , t h / r − 1 , (8)</p><p>where λ P , t h = h c / 2 k B T [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132601-ref15">15</xref>] and T = T g r are the thermal wavelength4 and temperature of the Planck lattice, respectively. This average graviton (or Planck oscillator) energy per state (or mode) times the number of states per unit volume times the number of gravitons N g r yields the GBR energy density, which is the Planck radiation formula for gravity:</p><p>u g r ( r ) = N g r n s 〈 E g r 〉 = 8 π 3 r 3 ( E g r e λ P , t h / r − 1 ) , (9)</p><p>where E g r = N g r ϵ g r .</p><p>The thermal Planck wavelength is determined so that the computed rotation speed of the galaxy due to the graviton energy density, as prescribed by the relation above, equals the observed rotation speed of the galaxy. The GBR energy and thermal Planck wavelength of a few spiral galaxies were determined from existing rotation curve data [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132601-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132601-ref17">17</xref>] and are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>The energy is related to the energy density by the following equation:</p><p>E g r = u g r V g r , (10)</p><p>where V g r = V t o t ( 1 − M N / M t o t ) is the gravitational volume<sup>5</sup>, within a region of space V t o t is the bounded by a disk of radius r, and thickness t = 1 kpc centered about the galactic plane and M t o t = v 2 r / G is the total gravitational energy of the spiral galaxy, as determined from its observed rotation speed. From Equations (2) and (10), the relativistic mass of the thermal gravitational radiation is given by</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Galaxy properties</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Galaxy</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >E<sub>gr</sub> (J)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >λ<sub>p</sub><sub>,th</sub> (kpc)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Milky Way</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.52E+51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NGC 1560</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.23E+49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NGC 3198</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.65E+50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NGC 4157</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.54E+51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>M g r = 8 π V g r 3 c 2 r 3 ( E g r e λ P , t h / r − 1 ) . (11)</p><p>Inserting Equation (11) into Equation (3) yields a relation for the theoretical rotation speed of the spiral galaxy. This relation can be used to generate the theoretical rotation curves plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>From these theoretical considerations, one recognizes that as the gravitational volume of a spiral galaxy increases, the number of allowed energy states increases,</p><p>which decreases the spacing between energy levels and subsequently causes the rotation curve of the galaxy to flatten<sup>8</sup>, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. Although this empirical result manifestly contradicts the “behavior” of the typical rotation curve as predicted by Newton’s well-known classical theory of gravitation, it is in complete agreement with the predictions of our non classical Newtonian (or Planckian) theory of gravity.</p><p>By differentiating u g r ( r ) with respect to r, to find the location r m of the maximum energy density, one obtains the following equation:</p><p>λ P , t h r m = 3 ( 1 − e − λ P , t h / r m ) ,</p><p>which can be iteratively solved. After a few iterations, one finds</p><p>λ P , t h r m = 2.821 . (12)</p><p>Once the thermal Planck wavelength is determined from observational rotation curve data, it is a straightforward matter to compute the location of the peak in the energy density distribution. We found that the peak GBR energy density of the Milky Way is approximately 1.29 nJ/m<sup>3</sup> and is located 4.25 kpc from the center of the galaxy.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Gravitational Black-Body Temperature<sup>9</sup></title><p>The GBR of a spiral galaxy consists of gravitational radiation in thermal equilibrium with the harmonic oscillators of the Planck lattice. When they are in thermal equilibrium, the average rate of emission of gravitational radiation by the Planck oscillators equals the average rate of absorption of gravitational radiation. At thermal equilibrium, the temperature T of the Planck lattice is equal to the temperature of the gravitational radiation T g r .</p><p>The black-body temperature of the gravitational field of a parcel or distribution of energy can be found from the wavelength at which the GBR curve peaks. From Equation (12) the relation for the gravitational black-body temperature (GBT) of a parcel or distribution of energy can be written in a form similar to that for Hawking radiation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132601-ref21">21</xref>]</p><p>T = η ℏ c 4 π k B r m (13)</p><p>where η = k P , t h L m with k P , t h = 2 π / λ P , t h and L m = 2 π r m . Hence, the GBT of the Milky Way Galaxy is 0.0194 zK. In accordance with Wien’s displacement law the product of the peak wavelength and the black-body temperature of curved space-time is expected to be a constant, λ<sub>m</sub>T = 0.005103 m∙K. In a similar manner, one may also recognize that the product of the thermal Planck wavelength and the corresponding GBT is also a constant, λ<sub>P</sub><sub>,th</sub>T = 0.007199 m∙K.</p><p>The Planck radiation formula for gravity can be expressed in terms of the wavelength λ , as</p><p>u g r ( λ ) = N g r n s ( λ ) 〈 E g r 〉 = 64 π 3 λ 3 ( E g r e β h c / λ − 1 ) , (14)</p><p>where β = 1 / k B T and n s ( λ ) = 64 π / 3 λ 3 is the number of states per unit volume.</p><p>In general, the GBR spectral density, which is plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> for the Milky Way Galaxy, has the form</p><p>S g r ( λ ) = N g r ρ s ( λ ) 〈 E g r 〉 = 64 π λ 4 ( E g r e β h c / λ − 1 ) , (15)</p><p>where ρ s ( λ ) = | d n s / d λ | = 64 π / λ 4 denotes the density of states per unit wavelength. Similar to electromagnetic black-body radiation, the total energy density</p><p>u g r = ∫ S g r ( λ ) d λ</p><p>is finite and for a constant number of gravitons N g r = β E g r / 2 , varies as T 4 :</p><p>u g r ≈ π 7 50 ( E g r λ P , t h 3 ) = 8 π 7 25 ( k B 4 T 4 h 3 c 3 ) N g r (16)</p><p>where λ P , t h = β h c / 2 . Hence, according to the galactic properties listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, the total GBR energy density of the Milky Way is less than 10 nJ/m<sup>3</sup>.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Interesting Theoretical Results</title><p>The distance R from the Earth to the Moon is approximately 3.84 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup> m. The computed energy density of gravitational radiation that permeates the Solar System is approximately<sup>10</sup> 0.88 nJ/m<sup>3</sup>. The strength of the gravitational field produced by the background GBR [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132601-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132601-ref24">24</xref>] of the Milky Way that slowly pulls the Moon toward the Earth is approximately:</p><p>g g r = 4 G M g r R s , E R = 2 M g r c 2 M E R ≈ 1.82 &#215; 10 − 16 m / s 2 ,</p><p>M g r = u g r V g r c 2 ≈ 2.32   kg ,</p><p>V g r = 4 π 3 R 3 ≈ 2.38 &#215; 10 26   m 3 ,</p><p>M E = 5.972 &#215; 10 24   kg ,</p><p>which is 13 orders of magnitude smaller than the gravitational field of Earth pulling on the Moon ~2.70 mm/s<sup>2</sup>. Here, M g r is the relativistic mass of the GBR contained within a spherical volume centered on Earth with a radius equal to the distance between Earth and Moon. This outcome confirms our earlier claim that the gravitational field generated by GBR is indeed extremely small, except in the case of very large astrophysical sources or events, i.e., galaxies, supermassive black hole collisions, etc.</p><p>At the edge of the Solar System, a distance of 143.7 billion kilometers<sup>12</sup> from the Sun, where the gravitational force of our Sun fades, the additional increase in the Sun’s gravitational pull due to the background GBR of the Milky Wayis approximately:</p><p>g g r = 2 M g r c 2 M ⊙ R ≈ 0.76 &#215; 10 − 10 m / s 2 ,</p><p>M g r = u g r V g r c 2 ≈ 1.21 &#215; 10 17   kg ,</p><p>V g r = 4 π 3 R 3 ≈ 1.24 &#215; 10 43   m 3 ,</p><p>M ⊙ = 1.988 &#215; 10 30   kg , <sup>13</sup></p><p>which is almost one-tenth the magnitude of the anomalous acceleration 8.74 &#215; 10<sup>−</sup><sup>10</sup> m/s<sup>2</sup> towards the Sun experienced by the Pioneer spacecrafts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132601-ref25">25</xref>] (launched in 1972 and 1973) as they moved beyond the orbit of Uranus (approximately 2.8 billion km from the Sun) on their way out of the Solar System.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The author declares that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this study.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Nash, L. (2024) The GBR Hypothesis Revisited. Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology, 10, 800-809. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhepgc.2024.102048</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.132601-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anderson, J., Laing, P., Lau, E., Liu, A., Nieto, M., &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2002) Study of the Anomalous Acceleration of Pioneer 10 and 11. &lt;i&gt;Physical Review D&lt;/i&gt;, 65, Article ID: 082004. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.65.082004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132601-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Agazie, G., &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2023) The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background. &lt;i&gt;The Astrophysical Journal Letters&lt;/i&gt;, 951, L8. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132601-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Michelson, P. (1987) On Detecting Stochastic Background Gravitational Radiation with Terrestrial Detectors. &lt;i&gt;Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society&lt;/i&gt;, 227, 933-941. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/227.4.933</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132601-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barish, B. and Weiss, R. (1999) LIGO and the Detection of Gravitational Waves. &lt;i&gt;Physics Today&lt;/i&gt;, 52, 44-50. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1063/1.882861</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132601-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hawking, S.W. (1975) Particle Creation by Black Holes. &lt;i&gt;Communications in M&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;thematical Physics&lt;/i&gt;, 43, 199-220. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345020 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132601-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Riles, K. (2012) Gravitational Waves: Sources, Detectors and Searches. &lt;i&gt;Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics&lt;/i&gt;, 68, 1-54. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2012.08.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132601-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Capozziello, S. and De Laurentis, M. (2011) Extended Theories of Gravity. &lt;i&gt;Physics Reports&lt;/i&gt;, 509, 167-321. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2011.09.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132601-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sanders, R. (2010) The Dark Matter Problem: A Historical Perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192309</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132601-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sofue, Y. (2015) Dark Halos of M31 and the Milky Way. &lt;i&gt;Publications of the Astr&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;o&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;nomical Society of Japan&lt;/i&gt;, 67, 75. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psv042</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132601-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brownstein, J.R. and Moffat, J.W. (2006) Galaxy Rotation Curves without Non-Baryonic Dark Matter. &lt;i&gt;The Astrophysical Journal&lt;/i&gt;, 636, 721-741. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1086/498208</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132601-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Boltzmann</surname><given-names> L. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1871</year>)<article-title>Some General Statements on Thermal Equilibrium</article-title><source> &lt;i&gt;Wiener &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Berichte&lt;/i&gt;</source><volume> 63</volume>,<fpage> 679</fpage>-<lpage>711</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132601-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Boltzmann</surname><given-names> L. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1868</year>)<article-title>Studies on the Balance of Living Force between Moving Material Points</article-title><source> &lt;i&gt;Wiener &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Berichte&lt;/i&gt;</source><volume> 58</volume>,<fpage> 517</fpage>-<lpage>560</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132601-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Manoukian, E.B. (2016) 45&amp;#730; Relative Orientations of Planes of Polarizations States of Gravitational Waves and the Graviton. &lt;i&gt;International Journal of Theoretical Physics&lt;/i&gt;, 55, 4878-4884. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-016-3111-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132601-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jeans, J. (1905) The Dynamical Theory of Gases and of Radiation. &lt;i&gt;Nature&lt;/i&gt;, 72, 101-102. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/072101d0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132601-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Parikh, M., Wilczek, F. and Zahariade, G. (2021) Signatures of the Quantization of Gravity at Gravitational Wave Detectors. &lt;i&gt;Physical Review D&lt;/i&gt;, 104, Article ID: 046021. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.046021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132601-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cacciatori, S., Preparata, G., Rovelli, S., Spagnolatti, I. and Xue, S.S. (1998) On the Ground State of Quantum Gravity. &lt;i&gt;Physics Letters B&lt;/i&gt;, 427, 254-260. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00349-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132601-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sivaram, C. and Arun, K. (2007) Thermal Gravitational Waves. &lt;i&gt;The Open Astro&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;omy Journal&lt;/i&gt;, 4, 65-71. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.2174/1874381101004010065</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132601-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nash, L. (2022) Gravitational Black-Body Radiation. &lt;i&gt;Journal of High Energy Phy&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;s&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;ics&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; Gravitation and Cosmology&lt;/i&gt;, 8, 527-535. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/jhepgc.2022.83038</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132601-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kirchhoff, G. (1860) On the Relation between the Radiating and Absorbing Powers of Different Bodies for Light and Heat. &lt;i&gt;The London&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; Edinburgh&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; and Dublin Phil&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;o&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;sophical Magazine and Journal of Science&lt;/i&gt;, 20, 1-21. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/14786446008642901</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132601-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Planck</surname><given-names> M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1901</year>)<article-title>On the Law of Energy Distribution in the Normal Spectrum</article-title><source> &lt;i&gt;A&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;nals of Physics&lt;/i&gt;</source><volume> 4</volume>,<fpage> 553</fpage>-<lpage>563</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132601-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bowley, R. and S&amp;#225;nchez, M. (1999) Introductory Statistical Mechanics. 2nd Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 166-169. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/hesc/9780198505761.001.0001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132601-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stephani, H. (2003) Some Remarks on Standing Gravitational Waves. &lt;i&gt;General Rel&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;tivity and Gravitation&lt;/i&gt;, 35, 467-474. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022330218708</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132601-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nash, L. (2022) On the Dynamics of Euclidean Space-Time at the Planck Scale. &lt;i&gt;R&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;e&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;ports in Advances of Physical Sciences&lt;/i&gt;, 6, Article ID: 2250002. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424942422500025</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132601-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Einstein</surname><given-names> A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1905</year>)<article-title>On a Heuristic Point of View about the Creation and Conversion of Light</article-title><source> &lt;i&gt;Annals of Physics&lt;/i&gt;</source><volume> 17</volume>,<fpage> 132</fpage>-<lpage>148</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132601-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schwinger, J. (1968) Sources and Gravitons. &lt;i&gt;Physical Review Journals Archive&lt;/i&gt;, 173, 1264-1272. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.173.1264</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>