<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Surgical Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-9407</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ss.2024.154019</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">SS-132526</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Review of Two Years of Surgical Activities of the General Surgery Department of the Reference Health Center of Commune I of Bamako Mali
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tounkara</surname><given-names>Cheickna</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cisse</surname><given-names>Amadou Beydi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Samake</surname><given-names>Hamidou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Diarra</surname><given-names>Issaka</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sanogo</surname><given-names>Modibo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Diarra</surname><given-names>Bogoba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Doumbia</surname><given-names>Seydou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yena</surname><given-names>Sadio</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Public Health of the Faculty of Medicine and Odontology-Stomatology, Bamako, Mali</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Directorate of Social and Health Services of the Armed Forces of Mali</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of General Surgery of the Reference Health Center of Commune I, Bamako, Mali</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Surgery, Mali Hospital, Bamako, Mali</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>04</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>195</fpage><lpage>206</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>25,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2024</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>19,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The objectives of this work were to evaluate the surgical activities carried out in the general surgery department of the Reference Health Center of Commune I of Bamako, to describe the sociodemographic characteristics of the operated patients, to determine the main pathologies encountered and to evaluate qualitatively the result of the treatment. In order to improve performance, and the quality of care, and to identify common pathologies in the surgical department, we undertook a retrospective study on surgical activities from January 2009 to December 2010. At the end of this study, out of 474 men and 187 women (equal sex ratio 2.53); we were able to determine the frequency of surgical pathologies. Farmers, housewives and pupils/students were the most represented with 25.9% respectively; 20% and 13.3%. The most frequently observed pathologies were wall hernia (44.8%), prostate adenoma (12%) and acute appendicitis (10.5%). The average length of hospitalization was 3.43 days. Infectious complications affected 25 patients (3.8% of cases) and a death rate of 0.45% (&lt;i&gt;i.e.&lt;/i&gt; 3 patients). The average cost of care was 53,500 FCFA. Indeed, the reality of surgical practice in health centers was not the same because of the level of skills of practicing surgeons.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Assessment</kwd><kwd> Surgical Activities</kwd><kwd> 2 Years</kwd><kwd> Reference Health Center of Commune I</kwd><kwd> Bamako</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Surgery is the medical discipline specializing in the treatment of diseases and trauma, which consists of performing operations manually and using instruments on a living body [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref1">1</xref>] . The advent of the sectorial health and population policy in 1990 allowed district health centers to play the role of reference health center (CSREF) around which a certain number of community health centers (CSCOM) revolve [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>The Cs ref has qualified personnel who provide care for surgical emergencies such as wall hernias, hydroceles, prolapse, appendicitis and gynecological surgical pathologies.</p><p>To assess the quality of surgical care activity, it is necessary to establish as faithfully as possible a record of pathologies based on sociodemographic data and the main pathologies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>In Belgium, groin hernia surgery was the most frequent intervention in adult surgery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>In Cameroon, hospital mortality in surgical settings “need for medical audit” was 208 deaths or 3.14% in the retrospective study covering 6615 medical records from 1982 to 1992 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>In Mali, the analysis of the surgical activities of the general surgery department “A” at Point G from January 2005 to January 2006 made it possible to determine the frequency of interventions performed and their immediate results [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref6">6</xref>] . All this work was carried out in central university hospitals.</p><p>The reality of surgical practice in reference health centers differs depending on the level of skills, the experience of the practitioners, the choice of patients due to the lack of intensive care units and the types of equipment.</p><p>We undertook this work on surgical practice in the reference health center of commune I of the Bamako district in order to clarify the diversities by setting ourselves objectives.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Research Methodology</title><p>This work was carried out in the Reference Health Center of Commune I of the District of Bamako which has a general surgery department.</p><p>This was a retrospective and descriptive study of 24 months from January 2009 to December 2010 in the general surgery department of the Reference Health Center of Commune I of the District of Bamako.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Course of the Study</title><p>The method of patient recruitment was carried out through consultations, emergency consultations and patients referred by other health structures.</p><p>The diagnosis of surgical pathologies was made on the basis of a clinical examination. Additional examinations were requested based on the diagnostic suspicion of the pathology and their accessibility. In case of surgical indication, a preoperative assessment was carried out: blood count, rhesus grouping, blood sugar, creatinemia and bleeding and coagulation times.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Sampling and Inclusion Criteria</title><p>We carried out a systematic recruitment of all patients and included any patient seen in surgical consultation and operated on in the general surgery department of the Cs ref of commune I regardless of the surgical pathology presented.</p><p>All cases were subject to a systematic clinical assessment assessment by the surgeon.</p><p>Patients of both sexes and of all ages are seen in consultation in the department and/or hospitalized but not operated on.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. We Studied the Following Variables</title><p>- Sociodemographic (Age, Sex, “Profession, Residence and/or Origin of parents”).</p><p>- Clinical examination: general signs, functional signs and physical signs.</p><p>- Additional examinations: (Biology, Imaging, Radiology, etc.) depending on the pathologies.</p><p>- Treatment: Medications used, surgical technique, type of anesthesia and post-operative follow-up.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. The Supports Used Were</title><p>- Outpatient consultation registers; register recording operating reports; hospitalization; the anesthesia protocol.</p><p>- Patient files.</p><p>- The patient’s investigation sheet.</p><p>Some files were incomplete and were not used.</p><p>The data were entered and analyzed using the EPI INFOS software version 7.2.1.0 and the Chi<sup>2</sup> comparison test was used with a significance threshold of P &lt; 0.05.</p><p>Verbal consent was obtained from each patient before blood samples were taken for preoperative assessment.</p><p>The information collected for each patient was entered in a file bearing an identification number guaranteeing anonymity. For safety reasons in relation to certain communicable diseases, particularly HIV and hepatitis B, when handling blood samples, certain safety measures have been taken: wearing gowns and gloves; decontamination of contaminated products and equipment used; the use of safety boxes and waste incineration.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>From January 2009 to December 2010, we carried out 3312 consultations; 832 hospitalizations and 661 surgical interventions, i.e. 19.95% of consultations and 79.45% of hospitalizations.</p><p>The average age was 39.45 years with extremes of 1 month to 95 years. The sex ratio was 2.53 in favor of men. Married patients were the most represented (429/661 or 64.9% of cases). The most represented socio-professional groups were farmers (25.9%), housewives (20%) and pupils/students (13.3%) of the cases (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The majority of our patients were seen in outpatient consultation, i.e. 79.6% of cases and came from Bamako in 56.60% of cases, of which 79% of cases resided in commune I of the Bamako district.</p><p>Abdominal pain constituted 157 cases or 23.8% of cases. Digestive surgical pathologies were the most observed with 452 cases or 68.4% of cases including 352 cases or 66.9% received in ordinary consultation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Digestive surgical pathologies represented 74.1% of emergency consultations with an age group of 20 - 39 years, i.e. 40% of cases, including 93 men, i.e. 68.9% of patients undergoing emergency surgery.</p><p>The diagnosis of digestive surgical pathologies constituted 68.5% of intraoperative interventions, of which hernia pathology represented 296 cases or 65.3% of all digestive surgical pathologies; gynecological (39.5% of all gynecological pathologies); urological: prostate adenoma was the most operated urological pathology, i.e. 12% of cases and 60.8% of all urological pathologies and osteoarticular pathologies represented 2 cases or 0.3% of cases.</p><p>The majority of our patients were operated on in 2009 (N = 356) or 53.9% of cases including 221 hospitalized or 59.2% of cases (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>General anesthesia was the type of anesthesia commonly used (392/661) or 59.3% and in emergency (116/135) or 86% of cases. The majority of our patients were operated on and hospitalized in 2009 (221/661) or 59.2% of cases. The average length of hospitalization was 3.43 days (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). The postoperative course was simple in 95.8% of cases. Complications were surgical site infections in 8 cases of wall herniation.</p><p>The mortality rate was 0.45% (one case of appendicular peritonitis; one case of small bowel obstruction and one case of gastric tumor). The average cost of care was 53,500 FCFA with extremes ranging from 22,970 FCFA and 154,000 FCFA (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Our study was retrospective, carried out in the general surgery department of the reference health center of commune I of the district of Bamako Mali, ranging from January 2009 to December 2010. We collected 661 cases of surgical pathologies operated on in the department.</p><p>The aim of this work was to understand the problem of surgical pathologies in the surgery department of the Cs ref of commune I. We were not able to explore all the parameters such as the operating technique.</p><p>The maximum number of patients who were operated on was in February with 14.8%. This time of year is at the end of the harvest, hence a greater influx of rural populations to surgical services. Fofana M. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref7">7</xref>] found that the months of August and February were the most frequent with 11.8% and 10% respectively.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Sociodemographic data</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Sociodemographic data</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 9 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 - 19 years old</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 29 years old</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 39 years old</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 - 49 years old</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 - 59 years old</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 years and over</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >178</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >474</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Feminine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >187</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Marital status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bride</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >429</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Child and or single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >197</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Divorced</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Widower widow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >Residence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Municipality I</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >522</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Commune II</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Commune III</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Municipality IV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Municipality V</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Municipality VI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Others</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="11"  >Occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Farmer/Farmer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >171</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Official</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trader</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Household</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Worker</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Student/Pupil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Driver</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Retirement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Breeder</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Others</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >661</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >661</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according to method of recruitment, reason for consultation and types of surgery</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Recruitment method/reason for consultation/Types of surgery</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Method of recruitment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ordinary consultation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >526</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Emergency</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >135</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="20"  >Patterns consultation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acute urine retention</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dysuria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pollakiuria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abdominal pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >157</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anal pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rectorrhagia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shutdown of materials and gases</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pelvic pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Swelling and/or scrotal pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Swelling and/or groin pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hematuria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abdominal mass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Umbilical swelling</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metrorrhagia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wound</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malformation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Desire for a child</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ulcero-necrotizing wound</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pelvic gravity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low back pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Types of surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Digestive surgical pathologies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >452</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gynecological surgical pathologies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Urological surgical pathologies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Surgical trauma pathologies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >661</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Surgical pathologies are seen at all ages. The average age was 39.45 years. In Ouagadougou, Ouiminga R.M. et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref8">8</xref>] , found that the average age was 31.2 years at the Yalgado Ouedrago national hospital center.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according to the type of surgery, the diagnosis chosen and the year of surgical intervention</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Types of surgery, diagnosis made and year of operation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="15"  >Pathologies Surgical Digestives (452)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wall herniation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >296</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acute appendicitis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Peritonitis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bowel obstruction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gastric tumor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-operative eventration</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hemorrhoids</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colon tumor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anal fissure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mesenteric tumor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anal fistula</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Meckel’s diverticulum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colic fistula</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Splenic tumor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Omphalocele</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Surgical Pathologies Gynecological (76)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovarian cyst</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ruptured ectopic pregnancy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uterine prolapse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uterine and ovarian tumors</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aftereffects of excision</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="9"  >Pathologies Surgical Urological (130)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Prostate adenoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hydrocele</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Renal lithiasis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Urethral stricture</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cystocele</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Testicular tumor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bladder tumor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cryptorchidism</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bladder neck sclerosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Surgical Pathologies Traumatological (2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Knee tumor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Palmar fingers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Year of surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >356</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >305</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >661</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according to type of anesthesia, hospitalization and post-operative outcomes</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Type of anesthesia/Hospitalization/Operative follow-up</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Types of anesthesia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Local anesthesia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >177</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Locoregional anesthesia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >General anaesthesia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >392</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Hospitalization</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >373</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >288</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Aftermath of surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Simple</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >633</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wall infection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Deep infection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Death</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >661</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according to the cost of care</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cost of support (Franc CFA)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;50.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >251</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.000 - 75.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >136</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.000 - 100.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.000 - 125.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >106</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;125.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Undetermined</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >661</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>In Bamako in 2005, Demb&#233;l&#233; B.M. reported an average age of 26 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref9">9</xref>] . Our average age is higher than those of the authors mentioned with a fairly significant difference for a Chi<sup>2</sup> = 16.05, P = 0.025. The sex ratio was 2.53 (standard deviation = 2.295). The male gender was significantly more numerous regardless of the type of surgical intervention apart from rare gynecological conditions, as in other series [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>This conformity of results between structures of different levels reflects the orientation of women towards the gynecology department of said structures, the high frequency of hernia pathology in men and prostate adenoma. All socio-professional strata were represented in our series. The cultivators (25.86%), were the most numerous as in the works of Fofana M. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref8">8</xref>] (23.3%) and Diakit&#233; M. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref13">13</xref>] (23%).</p><p>The reason for consultation was abdominal pain (157/661) or 23.8%, linked to the frequency of digestive pathologies. Clot P.H. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref14">14</xref>] as well as Rasmoelina N. and Coll. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref15">15</xref>] also found pain to be a dominant functional sign. Our patients (79.6%) were seen in ordinary consultation, higher than those of Chianakwana et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref16">16</xref>] in 2005, (74.4%) and Fofana M. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref10">10</xref>] in 2006, (63.4%) in the surgery department of the S&#233;gou regional hospital.</p><p>Our patients received in emergency (20.4%) were lower than those of Chianakwana et al. in 2005 (25.6%) and Fofana M. in 2006 (36.6%). We are a Cs ref unlike hospitals according to the health pyramid of Mali.</p><p>Digestive surgical pathologies (68.5%), Mianfoutila S. et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref17">17</xref>] found 62.5% at the Pierre Mobengo central army hospital in Brazzaville. Hernia pathology represented (296/661) or 44.8% of surgical pathologies and 65.3% of digestive interventions. This high prevalence of hernia is found in other series in Mali [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref20">20</xref>] , in Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref22">22</xref>] and in Europe [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>Gynecological surgical pathologies (76/661) or 11.5%, mainly concerned uterine tumors, GEU and uterine prolapse and Diallo S.S. in Mali (26.4%) and Sanou M. J. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref23">23</xref>] (26.6%) in Ouagadougou. Urological surgical pathologies (130/661) or 19.7%; prostate adenoma constituted 12% of interventions compared to 60.8% urological, Dara A.E. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref24">24</xref>] reported 14.9%; Noutacdie K. R. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref25">25</xref>] (30.7%) and Guindo B. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref2">2</xref>] (55.2%). This work was carried out in urology departments unlike ours.</p><p>General anesthesia (59.3%) in our series corroborates with that of Fofana M. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref8">8</xref>] (55%), Chi<sup>2</sup> = 2.62, P = 0.121187. It represented 77% and 86% of cases in other studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref26">26</xref>] .</p><p>The surgical consequences were simple in 95.8% of cases, with infectious postoperative complications (3.8%) including SSI (3.18%). We have identified 21 cases of wall infection, and 4 cases of deep infection, with the hernia pathology having experienced the most complications.</p><p>Coulibaly S. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref26">26</xref>] found a suppuration rate of 6.6% and N’Dayisaba G. et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref27">27</xref>] reported 7% septic complications. They vary from 2.08% to 19% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref27">27</xref>] ; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref28">28</xref>] ; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref29">29</xref>] . We deplored 3 cases of postoperative death, i.e. 0.4% including a case of small bowel obstruction, a case of peritonitis due to appendicular perforation and a case of gastric tumor compared to 0.3% at Diakit&#233; M.L. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><p>Authors found rates of 8% to 16% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132526-ref33">33</xref>] . Our sample size was smaller than the others (hospital structures).</p><p>The average cost of care was 53,500 FCFA, higher than the minimum wage (28,460 FCFA).</p><p>This average cost of care is well above the income of the vast majority of the population.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>This work allowed us to evaluate the performance and inadequacies of the general surgery department of the Reference Health Center of commune I of the Bamako district in Mali.</p><p>Wall hernia constituted the majority of surgical pathologies operated on. Most of our patients were operated on as an outpatient procedure, thereby reducing healthcare costs. The postoperative course was simple in most cases.</p><p>The case fatality rate was low (one case of peritonitis due to appendiceal perforation, one case of small bowel obstruction and one case of gastric tumor). Other studies will complete this work.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>To patients who have given their informed consent, to the staff of the general surgery department of the CS Ref of commune I of the Bamako district.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Cheickna, T., Beydi, C.A., Hamidou, S., Issaka, D., Modibo, S., Bogoba, D., Seydou, D. and Sadio, Y. (2024) Review of Two Years of Surgical Activities of the General Surgery Department of the Reference Health Center of Commune I of Bamako Mali. Surgical Science, 15, 195-206. https://doi.org/10.4236/ss.2024.154019</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.132526-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Windstein, J.-P. (2009)Larousse M&amp;#233;dical. Larousse, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guindo, B. (2008) Etude r&amp;#233;trospective des activit&amp;#233;s du service d&amp;#8217;urologie du CHU Gabriel Tour&amp;#233; 2000-2006. Ph.D. Thesis, Universit&amp;#233; de Bamako, Bamako.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diallo, M. (2008) Evaluation des activit&amp;#233;s de chirurgie au centre de sant&amp;#233; de r&amp;#233;f&amp;#233;rence de Macina. Ph.D. Thesis, Universit&amp;#233; de Bamako, Bamako.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lerut, J., Ciccarelli, O. and Astarci, P. (2000) La chirurgie herniaire. &lt;i&gt;Louvain M&amp;#233;d&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;i&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;cal&lt;/i&gt;, 119, 452-457.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Takongmo, S., Angwafo, F., Binan, F., Afan&amp;#233; Ela, A., Fonkou, A., Gaggini, J., Le Saint, B., Lantum, D. and Malonga, D. (1993) Mortalit&amp;#233; hospitali&amp;#232;re en milieu chirurgical: N&amp;#233;cessit&amp;#233; de l&amp;#8217;audit m&amp;#233;dical. &lt;i&gt;M&amp;#233;decine d&lt;/i&gt;&amp;#8217;&lt;i&gt;Afrique&lt;/i&gt;, 40, 729-733.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diallo, S.S. (2008) Analyse des activit&amp;#233;s du service de chirurgie g&amp;#233;n&amp;#233;rale &amp;#171; A &amp;#187; du CHU du Point G de janvier 2005 &amp;#224; janvier 2006. Ph.D. Thesis, Universit&amp;#233; de Bamako, Bamako.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fofana, M. (2006) Epid&amp;#233;miologie des pathologies chirurgicales dans le service de chirurgie g&amp;#233;n&amp;#233;rale de l&amp;#8217;h&amp;#244;pital r&amp;#233;gional de S&amp;#233;gou. Ph.D. Thesis, Universit&amp;#233; de Bamako, Bamako.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ouiminga, R.M., Testa, J., Sanou, A., Yilboudo, J., Bou-Salah, A. and Richard, J. (1993) Activit&amp;#233; chirurgicale du centre hospitalier national Yalgado Ouedraogo de Ougadougou durant l&amp;#8217;ann&amp;#233;e 1990. &lt;i&gt;M&amp;#233;decine d&lt;/i&gt;&amp;#8217;&lt;i&gt;Afrique Noire&lt;/i&gt;, 40, 112-116.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Demb&amp;#233;l&amp;#233;, B.M. (2005) Etude des p&amp;#233;ritonites g&amp;#233;n&amp;#233;ralis&amp;#233;es dans les services de chirurgie g&amp;#233;n&amp;#233;rale et p&amp;#233;diatrique de l&amp;#8217;h&amp;#244;pital Gabriel Tour&amp;#233;. Ph.D. Thesis, Universit&amp;#233; de Bamako, Bamako.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harouna, Y., Yaya, H., Abdou, I. and Bazira, L. (2000) Pronostic de la hernie inguinale &amp;#233;trangl&amp;#233;e de l&amp;#8217;adulte: Influence de la n&amp;#233;crose intestinale. A propos de 34 cas. &lt;i&gt;M&amp;#233;decine d&lt;/i&gt;&amp;#8217;&lt;i&gt;Afrique Noire&lt;/i&gt;, 935, 317-320.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sanamdou, D. (1986) Chirurgie et sant&amp;#233; publique. Notre point de vue au Burkina Faso. Ph.D. Thesis, Ouagadougou.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Samak&amp;#233;, S., Traor&amp;#233;, S.M., Ba, S., Demb&amp;#233;l&amp;#233;, E., Diop, M., Mariko, S. and Libit&amp;#233;, P.R. (2006) Enqu&amp;#234;te d&amp;#233;mographique et de sant&amp;#233; du Mali 2006. Cellule de Planification et de Statistique, Minist&amp;#232;re de la Sant&amp;#233;, Direction Nationale de la Statistique et de l&amp;#8217;Informatique and Minist&amp;#232;re de l&amp;#8217;&amp;#201;conomie, de l&amp;#8217;Industrie et du Commerce, Bamako.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diakit&amp;#233;, M.L. (2009) Epid&amp;#233;miologie des interventions chirurgicales dans l&amp;#8217;unit&amp;#233; de chirurgie du centre de sant&amp;#233; de r&amp;#233;f&amp;#233;rence de la commune VI. Ph.D. Thesis, Universit&amp;#233; de Bamako, Bamako.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Clot, P.H. (1982) Contusions et plaies de l&amp;#8217;abdomen. Encyclop&amp;#233;die m&amp;#233;dico-chirurgicale et des urgences (Paris), 24039A10, 11-79.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rasmoelina, N., Rajabilson, T., &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2010) Facteur de mortalit&amp;#233; pour les urgences digestives dans le service de r&amp;#233;animation du CHU de Fianarantsoa Madagascar. &lt;i&gt;Revue d&lt;/i&gt;&amp;#8217;&lt;i&gt;Anesth&amp;#233;sie&lt;/i&gt;-&lt;i&gt;R&amp;#233;animation et de M&amp;#233;decine d&lt;/i&gt;&amp;#8217;&lt;i&gt;Urgence&lt;/i&gt;, 2, 10-11.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chianakwana, G.U., Ihegihu, C.C., Okafor, P.I., Anyanwu, S.N. and Mbonu, O.O. (2005) Adult Surgical Emergencies in a Developing Country: The Experience of Nnamdi Azikiwe Universty Teaching Hospital Nnewi Anambra State Nigeria. &lt;i&gt;World Journal of Surgery&lt;/i&gt;, 29, 804-807. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7670-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mianfoutila, S. and Bahamboula Mpassi-Abdelsemed, R. (1993) Anesth&amp;#233;sie locor&amp;#233;gionale en chirurgie g&amp;#233;n&amp;#233;rale &amp;#224; propos de 464 cas. &lt;i&gt;M&amp;#233;decine d&lt;/i&gt;&amp;#8217;&lt;i&gt;Afrique Noire&lt;/i&gt;, 40, 594-596.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Coulibaly, D.K. (1985) Etude statistique sur l&amp;#8217;&amp;#233;volution du nombre d&amp;#8217;interventions chirurgicales dans les h&amp;#244;pitaux de Bamako et kati (a propos de 82987 actes chirurgicaux). Ph.D. Thesis, Ecole Nationale de M&amp;#233;decine et de Pharmacie du Mali, Bamako.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Halidou, A. (2008) Evaluation de la prise en charge des hernies abdominales simples &amp;#224; l&amp;#8217;h&amp;#244;pital de Gao &amp;#224; propos de 103 cas trait&amp;#233;s chirurgicalement dans le service de chirurgie g&amp;#233;n&amp;#233;rale. Ph.D. Thesis, Universit&amp;#233; de Bamako, Bamako.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Timbely, G. (1987) Contribution &amp;#224; l&amp;#8217;&amp;#233;tude comparative des interventions chirurgicales effectu&amp;#233;es dans les centres de sant&amp;#233; p&amp;#233;riph&amp;#233;riques du Mali. Ph.D. Thesis, Ecole Nationale de M&amp;#233;decine et de Pharmacie du Mali, Bamako.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Homawoo</surname><given-names> K.K. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1989</year>)<article-title>R&amp;#233;flexion sur 3101 hernies de l&amp;#8217;aine trait&amp;#233;es au CHU de Lom&amp;#233;-Tokoin</article-title><source> &lt;i&gt;M&amp;#233;decine d&lt;/i&gt;&amp;#8217;&lt;i&gt;Afrique Noire&lt;/i&gt;</source><volume> 36</volume>,<fpage> 917</fpage>-<lpage>924</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diallo, A.B., Tour&amp;#233;, A., &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2003) Hernies inguinales &amp;#233;trangl&amp;#233;es &amp;#224; l&amp;#8217;h&amp;#244;pital de Mamou en Guin&amp;#233;e &amp;#224; propos de 160 cas. &lt;i&gt;Journal Africain de Chirurgie Digestive&lt;/i&gt;, 3, 254-259.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sanou, M.J. (1991) Les abdomens chirurgicaux au centre hospitalier national Yalgado Ouedraogo. Bilan de cinq ann&amp;#233;es d&amp;#8217;activit&amp;#233;s dans le service de chirurgie g&amp;#233;n&amp;#233;rale. Ph.D. Thesis, Ouagadougou.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dara, A.E. (2008) Pathologies chirurgicales de l&amp;#8217;appareil urinaire dans le service de chirurgie &amp;#8220;B&amp;#8221; du CHU du Point G. Ph.D. Thesis, Universit&amp;#233; de Bamako, Bamako.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Noutacdie, K.R. (2000) Evaluation de l&amp;#8217;ad&amp;#233;nomectomie dans le service d&amp;#8217;urologie de l&amp;#8217;h&amp;#244;pital du Point G. Ph.D. Thesis, Universit&amp;#233; de Bamako, Bamako.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Coulibaly, S. (2008) Utilisation des antibiotiques en traitement postop&amp;#233;ratoire &amp;#224; la maternit&amp;#233; du centre de sant&amp;#233; de r&amp;#233;f&amp;#233;rence de la commune V du district de Bamako. Ph.D. Thesis, Universit&amp;#233; de Bamako, Bamako.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ndayisaba, G., Bazira, L., Gahongano, G., Hitimana, A. and Karayuba, R. (1993) Bilan des complications infectieuses en chirurgie g&amp;#233;n&amp;#233;rale: Analyse d&amp;#8217;une s&amp;#233;rie de 2218 interventions. &lt;i&gt;M&amp;#233;decine d&lt;/i&gt;&amp;#8217;&lt;i&gt;Afrique Noire&lt;/i&gt;, 40, 571-573.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berche, P., Ghanassia, J.C., Auryl, J.L., &lt;i&gt;et &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;al&lt;/i&gt;. (1987) Etude quantitative de la flore bact&amp;#233;rienne de l&amp;#8217;air en salle d&amp;#8217;op&amp;#233;ration. &lt;i&gt;La Semaine des H&amp;#244;pitaux&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; de Paris&lt;/i&gt;, 54, 653-657.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olson, M., O&amp;#8217;Connor, M. and Schwartz, M.L. (1984) Surgical Wounds Infections. A 5 Years Prospective Study of 2093 Wounds at Mineanpolis V.A Medical Center. &lt;i&gt;Annals of Surgery&lt;/i&gt;, 199, 253-259. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198403000-00001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soudre, R., Yilboudo, J., Ouedraogo, K. and Ouiminga, R.M. (1987) Aspects &amp;#233;tiologiques des ost&amp;#233;&amp;#239;tes post op&amp;#233;ratoires &amp;#224; l&amp;#8217;h&amp;#244;pital Yalgado Ouedraogo de Ouagadougou, Burkina-Faso. &lt;i&gt;Interfac&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;e&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; Afrique&lt;/i&gt;, No. 3, 29-32.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Serengbe</surname><given-names> B. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2002</year>)<article-title>Acute Abdominal Pain in Children at the Pediatric Hospital of Banqui: Epidemiology, Clinical, Paraclinical, Therapeutic and Evolutive Aspects</article-title><source> &lt;i&gt;Archives de Pediatrie&lt;/i&gt;</source><volume> 9</volume>,<fpage> 136</fpage>-<lpage>141</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eker&amp;#233;, A.U., Yzellowe, B. and Umune, E.S. (2004) Surgical Mortality in the Emergency Room. &lt;i&gt;International Orthopaedics&lt;/i&gt;, 28, 187-190.&lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-004-0548-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132526-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bazira</surname><given-names> L. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2001</year>)<article-title>Deux ann&amp;#233;es de chirurgie digestive d&amp;#8217;urgence &amp;#224; l&amp;#8217;h&amp;#244;pital de Niamey. Etude analytique et pronostique</article-title><source> &lt;i&gt;M&amp;#233;decine d&lt;/i&gt;&amp;#8217;&lt;i&gt;Afrique Noire&lt;/i&gt;</source><volume> 48</volume>,<fpage> 49</fpage>-<lpage>54</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>