<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8792</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2024.144045</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG-132502</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Delay for Performing Laparotomy for Extra Uterine Pregnancy in N&amp;#8217;Djamena Mother and Child University Hospital
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gabkika</surname><given-names>Bray Madou&amp;#233;</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Saleh</surname><given-names>Abdelsalam</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Khadidja</surname><given-names>Mahayadine Salah</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Serfeurbe</surname><given-names>Pefah</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Foumsou</surname><given-names>Lhagadang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>N&amp;amp;#8217;Djamena Mother and Child University Hospital, N&amp;amp;#8217;Djamena, Chad</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Faculty of Human Health Sciences of N&amp;amp;#8217;Djamena, N&amp;amp;#8217;Djamena, Chad</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>04</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>520</fpage><lpage>527</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>7,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2024</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>18,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  &lt;b&gt;Background&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;Ectopic pregnancy is defined as any pregnancy developed outside the uterine cavity.&lt;b&gt; Objective: &lt;/b&gt;to study the relationship between the duration of laparotomy for EP and maternal prognosis. Patients and method. This was a prospective analytical study performed during a period of six (06) months, from May 1st to October 30, 2023, on delay time to perform laparotomy for EP in N&amp;#8217;Djamena Mother and child University hospital (NMCUH). We included in this series all patients admitted for EP managed by laparotomy. Data were collected using Word software and analyzed using SPSS 18.0 version 2018. The p value statistical test was used to compare variables (p significant if &amp;#8804;5%). &lt;b&gt;Results&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;:&lt;/b&gt; We recorded 92 cases of EP out of 5751 pregnancies, giving a frequency of 1.6%. Among patients diagnosed with EP, 76/92 (82.6%) had an indication of laparotomy. In 90.8%, the EP was ruptured. On admission, the diagnosis of EP was made within &lt;15 min in 43.2% of cases. The time between diagnosis and indication for laparotomy was less than 15 minutes in 96% of patients. Blood products caused a delay in 63.1% of cases, with a delay of &gt;1 hour in 15.8% of cases. The time to sign the consent allowing doctor to operate was &gt;1 hour in 14.5% of cases. The operating room was unavailable in 34.2% of cases, with an unavailability of &gt;1 hour in 17.1% of cases. Total salpingectomy was performed in 93.4%. Salpingotomy was performed in 6.6%. The lethality rate was 3.9% with significant value when the delay after indication and admission in the operating room is &gt;1 (p value = 0.03). &lt;b&gt;Conclusion&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;:&lt;/b&gt; Various factors, such as the search for blood products, the time loss to sign the consent form and the unavailability of the operating room, delay the laparotomy, influence maternal prognosis. Anticipation on these factors is necessary in order to limit the proportion of delays.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Delay</kwd><kwd> Laparotomy</kwd><kwd> NMCUH</kwd><kwd> Chad</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Ectopic pregnancy is defined as any pregnancy that developed outside the uterine cavity. The majority of ectopic pregnancies are therefore tubal pregnancies. It is a frequent occurrence due to the resurgence of sexually transmitted infections and smoking [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>It is a serious problem, as it is still the leading cause of maternal death and subsequent infertility in Chad, with up to 50% infertility in nulliparous women in the world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>Much progress has been made in recent years in the management of EP. Treatment modalities depend on the stage of development. Treatment options include abstention, medical treatment and surgery by endoscopy or laparotomy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref7">7</xref>] . Advanced forms often require surgery. However, in developing countries, the practice of endoscopic surgery is not widespread, making laparotomy as the treatment of advanced forms of EP. In Chad, the treatment of EP remains dominated by surgery (laparotomy).</p><p>We therefore initiated this series to study the relationship between the duration of laparotomy for EP and maternal prognosis.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Patients and Method</title><p>This was a prospective analytical study lasting covering a period of six (06) months, from May 1<sup>st</sup> to October 30, 2023, on the delay time to perform laparotomy for EP in N’Djamena Mother and Child University Hospital.</p><p>Patients were recruited in emergency room after diagnosing of the EP. The diagnose was clinic basing on signs like: amenorrhea, metrorrhagia, vagina bleeding, the scan and the pregnancy test. We included in this series all patients admitted for EP surgically managed by laparotomy and who consented to participate. There were followed after surgical during hospitalization.</p><p>Data were collected using a pre-established form containing variables related to the management.</p><p>Data were entered using Word and analyzed using SPSS 18.0 version 2018. p-value statistical tests were used to compare variables (p significant if ≤5%).</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Frequency</p><p>We recorded 92 cases of EP out of 5751 pregnancies, giving a frequency of 1.6%.</p><p>Among patients diagnosed with EP, 76/92 (82.6%) had an indication for laparotomy, including 3 (3.2%) after failure of medical treatment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients by age group</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Age (year)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >n</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 - 25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 - 30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Age</p><p>Patients in the 18 - 25 age group accounted for 50%.</p><p>The mean age was 24.3 &#177; 2.1 years, with extremes of 16 and 35 years.</p><p>Origin</p><p>Patients residing in N’Djamena represented 94.7% (n = 72).</p><p>History</p><p>Ten patients (13.2%) had a history of sexually transmitted infection and 2 (2.6%) had a history of EP. Considering the use of contraceptive method, 13 patients (17.1%) had used a contraceptive method (pill = 1, implant = 1 and injectable = 11).</p><p>Clinical signs</p><p>The symptomatic triad consisted with: amenorrhea, metrorrhagia and pelvic pain was present in 61.8% of cases (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Type of EP</p><p>In 90.8% (n = 69) the EP was ruptured, compared with 9.1% (n = 7) unruptured.</p><p>Time to confirmation of diagnosis</p><p>On admission, the diagnosis of EP was made less than 15 minutes for 48 patients (63.2%). However, 16 patients (21.1%) and 12 patients (15.8%) were diagnosed within 15 - 30 min and &gt;30 min respectively.</p><p>Time between diagnosis and indication for laparotomy</p><p>The time between diagnosis and indication for laparotomy was less than 15 minutes in 96% of patients (n = 73). Three patients (3.9%) who initially benefited a medical treatment had a delay between diagnosis and indication for laparotomy of 5 days.</p><p>Causes of delay and time taken between indication for laparotomy and admission to the operating room</p><p>The blood products caused a delay in 63.1% (n = 48), with a delay time &gt; 1 h in 15.8% (n = 12) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>The time taken to sign the consent file allowing the operation caused a delay &gt; 1 h in 14.5% of cases (n = 11).</p><p>The operating room was unavailable in 34.2%, with unavailability of the operative room &gt; 1 h in 17.1% (n = 13).</p><p>Location of EP</p><p>The EP was ampullary in 94.7% of cases (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Clinical signs</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Clinical aspects</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >n</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metrorrhagia and pelvic pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amenorrhea, metrorrhagia and pelvic pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amenorrhea and metrorrhagia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amenorrhea and pelvic pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Cause of delay and duration</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cause of delay</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >n</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Looking of blood products</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;5 mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 - 10 mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 - 30 mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 1 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;1 heure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Signature of consent file allowing the operation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;5 mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 - 10 mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 - 30 mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 mn et 1 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;1 heure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unavailability of operating room</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;15 mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 - 30 mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 - 45 mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >46 mn - 1 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;1 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> EP localization</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >EP localization</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >n</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ampullary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isthmic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Infundibular</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Surgical procedure</p><p>Total salpingectomy was performed in 93.4% (n = 71). Salpingotomy was performed in 6.6% (n = 5).</p><p>Prognosis</p><p>Obstetrical prognosis was good in 96.1% (n = 73). The lethality rate was 3.9% (n = 3).</p><p>Considering maternal lethality, we noted that the maternal prognose was worse when the delay time from indication for laparotomy to admission in operative room was &gt;1 h (p = 0.03).</p><p>One maternal death was recording (delay between indication and operation was 1 h). The hemodynamic stage of patients with ruptured EP the worse wen the delay to be operated was ≥45 mn.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The frequency of the EP in this study was 1.6% and an indication for laparotomy represented 82.6%. This frequency of EP agrees with data from authors such as Alabong [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref8">8</xref>] in Cameroon in 2020, Charlotte B [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref9">9</xref>] , in Nigeria in 2020 and Suneeta S [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref10">10</xref>] in India in 2019 and Kripa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref11">11</xref>] in Nepal in 2021 ranging between 1.3% - 1.56%. Whatever the frequency of EP, the gold standard for surgical treatment remains laparoscopic surgery. However, the availability of laparoscopy is a serious problem in developing country where laparotomy is the only remains the main surgical management. Certain situations, such as hemodynamic status, previous abdominal surgery and the experience of the surgeon, may justify laparotomy from the outset [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref12">12</xref>] . In our context, the unavailability of the laparoscopic column justifies systematic laparotomy.</p><p>Among the factors influencing the use of the laparotomy, the hemodynamic status is an important one. Blood loss is greater in cases of ruptured ectopic pregnancy. Ruptured EPs are common in developing countries, where patients are seen late [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref13">13</xref>] . This remains true in this series and that of Kripa in Nepal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref11">11</xref>] , with 90.8% and 75% of EPs respectively being ruptured.</p><p>The time taken to diagnose EP varies. The diagnosis is most obvious in patients seen late, in whom the symptomatic triad of amenorrhea, pelvic pain and metrorrhagia is often present. This study confirms this assertion, with 61.8% of patients presenting with the symptomatic triad (amenorrhea, pelvic pain and metrorrhagia). There are disparities in these rates. Charlotte [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref9">9</xref>] in Nigeria noted 71.6%, 89.3% and 96.4% respectively of bleeding, amenorrhea and pelvic pain. Diagnosis was done less than 15 minutes in 63.2% of cases. This time can be considered as time necessary to perform the biological pregnancy test and the echography. Clinical signs such as metrorrhagia and pelvic pain in a context of amenorrhea immediately allow one to the suspect an ectopic pregnancy.</p><p>According to current literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref15">15</xref>] , there should be no delay in performing laparotomy for ruptured EP (unstable patients). This assertion is disturbed in our context by the discovery of factors delaying laparotomy. Gabkika BM [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref16">16</xref>] , in a series on the delay of caesarean section, reported that the main obstacles to caesarean section were: signature of the consent file allowing the operation, the unavailability of blood products. This study confirms with 48 patients (63.1%) that have experienced a delay linked to the unavailability of blood, (15.8% with ≥1 hour). This delay is attributable to the department’s protocol, which assigns the search of blood products in emergency to the patient’s relatives. Blood collection from the National Blood Transfusion Center and the transport to the N’Djamena Mother and Child University Hospital could account for this delay.</p><p>We found that the unavailability of the operating room was the cause of the delay in admission to the operating room in 34.2%, (with unavailability &gt; 1 h in 17.1%). The availability of the operating room is variable, depending on certain periods and considering the status of N’Djamena’s Mother and Child University Hospital, which is recognized as a reference structure for reproductive health. During peak periods, the N’Djamena Mother and Child Hospital’s operating room are also used for emergency procedures (especially Caesarean sections).</p><p>A specific delay met only in our country is the delay to sign the consent file allowing the operation. We noted that the delay to sign the consent file was &gt;1 h in 14.5% of cases (n = 11). This delay is attributable to the attitude of some families, who refuse the surgical procedure. Indeed, the fear of surgical complications justifies these families’ behavior who do not consider laparotomy to be a life-saving procedure.</p><p>Taking into account the location of the EP, the literature shows that there is a high proportion of ampullary extra uterine pregnancies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref17">17</xref>] . This study confirms these findings, with 94.7% of EPs being ampullary. These tubal localizations of EP often require surgical management in the event of rupture. There is no standard surgical treatment for the management of EP. Depending on the operative findings, and taking into account the patient’s history and desire for pregnancy, salpingectomy or salpingotomy may be performed.</p><p>Salpingectomy, which is a radical treatment, alters the subsequent prognosis of patients’ fertility, unlike salpingotomy, which favours the possibility of recurrence. We noted that 93.4% of patients had undergone salpingectomy. The same is true for Alabong [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref8">8</xref>] , Charlotte [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref9">9</xref>] and Kripa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132502-ref11">11</xref>] , who report a high proportion of salpingectomies. We found that the maternal mortality rate was significant for a delay of more than 1 hour between the indication for laparotomy and admission in operating room (p = 0.03). This delay exacerbates the precarious maternal state after blood loss, thus favoring the onset of complications likely to lead to death.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Treatment of EP by laparotomy is common practice in N’Djamena mother and Child University Hospital. Various factors, such as the search for blood products, signature of the consent form and unavailability of the operating room, delay laparotomy, thus influencing maternal prognosis. Anticipation on these factors is necessary in order to limit the proportion of delays.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Madou&#233;, G.B., Abdelsalam, S., Salah, K.M., Pefah, S. and Lhagadang, F. (2024) Delay for Performing Laparotomy for Extra Uterine Pregnancy in N’Djamena Mother and Child University Hospital. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 14, 520-527. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2024.144045</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.132502-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Farquhar, C.M. (2005) Ectopic Pregnancy. Lancet, 366, 583-591. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67103-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132502-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Varma, R. and Gupta, J. (2012) Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy.&lt;i&gt; Clinical Evidence&lt;/i&gt;, 2012, 1406. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132502-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sivalingam, V.N., Duncan, W.C., Kirk, E., Shephard, L.A. and Horne, A.W. (2011) Diagnosis and Management of Ectopic Pregnancy. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care&lt;/i&gt;, 4, 231-240. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2011-0073</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132502-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cai, H., Mol, B.W., Li, P., Liu, X., Watrelot, A. and Shi, J. (2020) Tubal Factor Infertility with Prior Ectopic Pregnancy: A Double Whammy? A Retrospective Cohort Study of 2,892 Women. &lt;i&gt;Fertility and Sterility&lt;/i&gt;, 9, 32688-32693.&lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.12.036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132502-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Udigwe, G.O., Umeononihu, O.S. and Mbachu, I.I. (2010) Ectopic Pregnancy. A 5 Year Review of Cases at Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teach. &lt;i&gt;Nigerian Medical Journal&lt;/i&gt;, 51, 18&amp;#224;-183.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132502-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gabkika, B.M., Saleh, A., Wilfried, I.S.R., Tchari, A. and Kolomso, D. (2015) Grossesse Extra-Ut&amp;#233;rine: Aspects &amp;#201;pid&amp;#233;miologiques et Pronostic Maternel &amp;#224; l&amp;#8217;H&amp;#244;pital de District De N&amp;#8217;djamena Sud (Tchad). &lt;i&gt;Kisangani M&amp;#233;dical&lt;/i&gt;, 1, 111-116. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132502-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kellie, M., Madeline, M., Ryan, M. and Coiado, O.C. (2023) Overview of Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis, Management, and Innovation. &lt;i&gt;Women&lt;/i&gt;&amp;#8217;&lt;i&gt;s Health&lt;/i&gt;, 19, 1-13.&lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057231160349 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132502-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Atabong, S.N.C., Meh, M.G., Mandeng, M.L.E., Claude, N.N., John, P.N.,&lt;i&gt; et al&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;(2020) Incidence, Risk Factors, Clinical Presentation and Treatment of Ectopic Pregnancy in the Limbe and Buea Regional Hospitals in Cameroon.&lt;i&gt; Pan African Medical Journal&lt;/i&gt;, 2, 1-10. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj-cm.2020.2.95.21279</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132502-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oguejiofor, C.B., Ezugwu, C.J., Eleje, G.U., and Emeka, E.A. (2020) Ruptured Ectopic Pregnancy in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital: What Has Changed? &lt;i&gt;Nternational Journal of Gynecological and Obstetrical Research&lt;/i&gt;, 8, 14-19.&lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.31907/2309-4400.2020.08.04</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132502-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Suneeta, S., Namrita, S., Sanjay, S., Praveen, K. and Atiya, A. (2020) Comparison between Laparoscopy and Laparotomy in the Management of Ectopic Pregnancy: A Retrospective Study. &lt;i&gt;International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obst&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;e&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;trics and Gynecology&lt;/i&gt;, 2, 705-709. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20200363</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132502-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kripa</surname><given-names> S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2021</year>)<article-title>Clinical Study of Ectopic Pregnancy in Nepal</article-title><source> &lt;i&gt;Women&lt;/i&gt;&amp;#8217;&lt;i&gt;s Health Car&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;e&lt;/i&gt;</source><volume> 10</volume>,<fpage> 524</fpage>-<lpage>529</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132502-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Edjo Nkilly, G., Okoue Ondo, R., Matsanga, A., Sougou, E., Manli, D., Tchantchou, T.D.D., Mati-Tsonga, S., &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;. (2020) Management of Ruptured Ectopic Pregnancies: Laparosurgery versus Laparotomy. &lt;i&gt;Health Sciences and Diseases&lt;/i&gt;, 6, 21-24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132502-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elsa, T.B., Kalayu, K., Merhawit, G.H., &lt;i&gt;et al.&lt;/i&gt; (2021) Ectopic Pregnancy in Tigray, Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Prevalence, Management Outcomes, and Associated Factors. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Pregnancy&lt;/i&gt;, 2021, Article ID: 4443117. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4443117</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132502-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">UNFPA (2018) Provider Guide. &lt;br&gt;https://gieraf.org/assets/images/article_41/01SONU AFRIQUE 3ème édition 2018.pdff  </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132502-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amanda, P., Lauren, C., Rebecca, C., &lt;i&gt;et al.&lt;/i&gt; (2023) Delays to Surgery in Emergency Department Cases of Ectopic Pregnancy: A Quality Improvement Study. &lt;i&gt;Journal of &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Obstetrics and Gynecology of Canada&lt;/i&gt;, 1, 21-26. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2022.11.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132502-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gabkika, B.M., Lhagadang, F., Mahayadine, K. and Sile, N. (2020) Time from Decision to Completion of Emergency Caesarean Section and Prognosis in N&amp;#8217;Djamena Mother and Child University Hospital. &lt;i&gt;World Journal of Gynecology &amp; Womens Health&lt;/i&gt;, 3, 1-4. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.33552/WJGWH.2020.03.000566</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132502-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Joseph, A.O., Babasola, O.O., Muisi, A.A.A., Okechukwu, U., Gbenga, O. and Osemen, O. (2020) Ectopic Pregnancy at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, South-Western Nigeria: Temporal Trends, Clinical Presentation and Management Outcomes from 2005 to 2014. &lt;i&gt;Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal&lt;/i&gt;, 3, 177-183. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_35_20</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>