<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">NR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Natural Resources</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-706X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/nr.2024.154007</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">NR-132469</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Mapping and Floristic Diversity of the Nakpadjouak Community Forest, Tami Canton, Togo (West Africa)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Senyo</surname><given-names>Kossi Ehlui</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Christian</surname><given-names>Anthony-Krueger</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Edinam</surname><given-names>Kola</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wouyo</surname><given-names>Atakpama</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alagie</surname><given-names>Bah</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Henrik</surname><given-names>von Wehrden</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tchaa</surname><given-names>Boukpessi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7"><sup>7</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Laboratoire de Botanique et &amp;amp;#201;cologie V&amp;amp;#233;g&amp;amp;#233;tale, D&amp;amp;#233;partement botanique, Facult&amp;amp;#233; des sciences, Universit&amp;amp;#233; de Lom&amp;amp;#233;, Lome, Togo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Science Education, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff6"><addr-line>Faculty of Sustainability, Center of Methods, Leuphana University of L&amp;amp;#252;neburg, L&amp;amp;#252;neburg, Germany</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Laboratoire de Recherche sur la Dynamique des Milieux et des Soci&amp;amp;#233;t&amp;amp;#233;s, Department of Geography, University of Lom&amp;amp;#233;, Lome, Togo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff7"><addr-line>Laboratoire de Recherches Biog&amp;amp;#233;ographiques et d&amp;amp;#8217;Etudes Environnementales, Department of Geography, University of Lome, Lome, Togo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>West Africa Science Service Center on Climate Change and Adapted Land Use WASCAL, University of the Gambia, Banjul, Gambia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Center for International Forestry Research and World Agroforestry (CIFOR-ICRAF), Nairobi, Kenya</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>16</day><month>04</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>83</fpage><lpage>105</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>21,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2024</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>17,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Since 2015, community forests have been promoted in Togo as an alternative to protect areas from degradation and as a means of contributing to forest landscape restoration. The study focuses on the &lt;i&gt;Nakpadjouak&lt;/i&gt; Community Forest (NCF) in Tami (Togo, West Africa) which contributes to community forests sustainable management. It aims in (i) mapping forest ecosystems and analysing their dynamic and (ii) characterizing the floristic diversity of the NCF. The ecosystems were mapped and their dynamic was evaluated based on Google Earth images of 2014 and 2020. Floristic and forestry inventories were carried out using the transect technique in a sample of 20 plots of 50 m &amp;#215; 20 m. The NCF was made up mainly by wooded/shrub savannahs (95.37%) and croplands/fallow (4.63%) in 2014. These two land use types undergone changes over the 6 years prior to 2020. By 2020, the NCF had 3 land use types: wooded/shrub savannahs (77.59%), open forest/wooded savannahs (22.23%), and croplands/fallows (0.18%). A total of 89 plant species belonging to 70 genera and 28 families were recorded within the NCF. The dominant species are: &lt;i&gt;Het&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;er&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;opogon c&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;ontortus&lt;/i&gt; (L.) P.Beauv. and &lt;i&gt;Combretum collinum&lt;/i&gt; Fresen. followed by &lt;i&gt;Pteleopsissuberosa&lt;/i&gt; Engl. &amp; Diels, &lt;i&gt;Annona senegalensis&lt;/i&gt; Pers. The most common species are: &lt;i&gt;Lannea acida&lt;/i&gt; A.Rich. s.l., &lt;i&gt;A. senegalensis&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;Vitell&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;ria paradoxa&lt;/i&gt; C.F.Gaertner subsp. &lt;i&gt;paradoxa&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;C. collinum&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Acacia dudge&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;o&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;nii&lt;/i&gt; Craib ex Holland. Due to its small area of just 40 hectares and its diverse plant life, this community forest of Savannahs Region is a significant biodiversity hotspot and warrants conservation efforts.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Community Forest</kwd><kwd> Floristic Diversity</kwd><kwd> Land Use Change</kwd><kwd> Biodiversity Hotspot</kwd><kwd> Tami</kwd><kwd> Savannah Region</kwd><kwd> Togo</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Protected areas, both state-owned and traditional, are essential for the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref1">1</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref6">6</xref>] . In addition to these two most important aspects, protected areas provide a range of other ecosystem services. These include mitigating the effects of climate change, providing timber and non-timber forest products, and generating income for communities, especially in rural areas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref9">9</xref>] . Nowadays, many protected areas, especially those owned by the state, are undergoing a process of anthropisation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref12">12</xref>] . This relates to how they are established and managed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref12">12</xref>] . As a result of socio-cultural upheaval, the resources of traditional protected areas, including forests and sacred groves, have also deteriorated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref14">14</xref>] . In the face of the degradation of state-owned protected areas, there is a growing trend towards the establishment and management of community forests [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref15">15</xref>] . These are forests that are managed by local people. This form of management is beginning to have a greater impact on conserving forest ecosystem goods and services [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref17">17</xref>] .</p><p>Sacred and/or community forests have played a significant role in the socio-cultural live of local communities, assisting in the preservation of biodiversity especially in areas where vegetation has significantly degraded or reduced [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref14">14</xref>] . In Western cultures, the focus on forests has largely shifted towards recreation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref20">20</xref>] . However, traditional societies across the Global South, including Latin America, Asia, Africa, and Oceania, maintain strong cultural connections between communities and specific forests. Initially, these ecosystems serve as sanctuaries for deities, spirits, or ancestors of a community [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><p>In addition to the socio-cultural significance, these forests serve as a significant hotspot of local biodiversity, providing an insight into the floristic history and primary vegetation of the region. The conservation of biodiversity through sacred and community forests has become a matter of growing international concern in Africa and other parts of the world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref22">22</xref>] . In the Savannah Region of Northern Togo, where forest cover, namely the protected areas are remarkably degraded [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref25">25</xref>] , sacred and community forests serve as true sanctuaries for species that have either already disappeared or are in danger of extinction. These small woodlands, ranging from a few acres to several dozen hectares, are dispersed throughout a degraded landscape and remain natural habitats for specific plant and animal species that are threatened. Apart from protecting the biodiversity and cultural significance, community forests also contribute to conserving forest landscape and increasing community resilience against climate change [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref16">16</xref>] . They also serve as a means economic revenues for residents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref27">27</xref>] .</p><p>This study was carried out on the Nakpadjouak Community Forest (NCF) as part of the sustainable management of community forests in Togo. Its aims at: (i) analysing the dynamics of the forest’s ecosystem from the time of its installation (2015) until today, (ii) assessing the diversity of plant species, and (iii) characterizing the demographic structure of woody plants in NCF.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area</title><p>The studied forest, Nakpadjouak Community Forest (NCF) is located in the canton of Tami, prefecture of Tone in Savannahs’ region of Togo (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The NCF is a part of the ecological zone I of Togo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref28">28</xref>] characterized by Soudanian</p><p>Savannahs stands [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref29">29</xref>] . Due to the soaring popularization, the native ecosystems were transformed to croplands and agroforestry parklands [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref30">30</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Data Collection</title><sec id="s2_2_1"><title>2.2.1. Sattelite Image Acquisition</title><p>The NCF map did not exist before this study. Therefore, the first activity was to demarcate the NCF. The mobile application LocustMap was used to record the routes and geographical coordinates. To digitise the land use units, the recorded route and GPS (Global Positioning System) coordinates were projected in Google Earth Pro software. Google Earth images provided by Astrium Service to Google Inc. in 2021 were used to map the land use units. The choice of these images was due to their high resolution (up to 1.5 m) and the small area of the NCF [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref31">31</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_2"><title>2.2.2. Sampling Design</title><p>Field data were collected along three transects 200 m apart. For the inventories, 100 m equidistant sampling points were established along each transect. This sampling method produced a total of 20 throughout the NCF. For phytosociological inventories of woody species, ecological inventories and forest inventories, the plot size was 50 m &#215; 20 m [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref32">32</xref>] . Phytosociological surveys of herbaceous flora were executed within plots of 10 m &#215; 10 m [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref33">33</xref>] . Three diagonally arranged 5 m &#215; 5 m sub-plots, one (1) in the centre and the other two (2) in the opposite corners on either side of the central plot, were defined within each large 50 m &#215; 20 m plot for the regeneration inventory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref35">35</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_3"><title>2.2.3. Phytosociological and Forest Inventories</title><p>Phytosociology surveys were conducted using a standard phytosociology form with following information: plot code, survey date, locality, geographical coordinates of point and type of surface survey. All species (woody and herbaceous) present in the defined inventory areas were listed. They were assigned an abundance/dominance coefficient according to Braun-Blanquet [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref36">36</xref>] . This scale is defined as follows: +: rare species, cover 0 to 1%; 1 = cover 1 to 5%; 2 = cover 5 to 25%; 3 = cover 25 to 50%; 4 = cover 50 to 75%; 5 = cover 75 to 100%.</p><p>Tree diameter, stem height and total height of woody plants with DBH ≥ 5 cm were measured during the forest inventory. Tree diameter was measured at 1.30 m from the ground using a forestry compass. Visual scoring was used to assess the height of the trunk and total height. Crown diameter was assessed in north-south and east-west directions. Potential regeneration was defined as all woody species with a DBH &lt; 5 cm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref37">37</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Data Analysis</title><sec id="s2_3_1"><title>2.3.1. Land Use Unit Mapping</title><p>The different land-use units were digitised using Google Earth Pro software while QGIS software was used to create the maps [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref32">32</xref>] . The coordinates of the points of the different formations were recorded in the field using GPS. These were projected onto the Google Earth image to validate the maps previously produced. After digitisation, the layers generated were saved in KML format. They were then projected onto a background map of Togo, WGS 84_UTM Zone 31N, using QGIS 2.18.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_2"><title>2.3.2. Assessment of the Floristic Diversity</title><p>Microsoft Excel spreadsheets were used to record the data collected in the field. The analysis consisted of compiling a list of the species found. These were then grouped by family and genus. The classification used is that of APG IV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref22">22</xref>] . It can be consulted on the website https://africanplantdatabase.ch/en. The biological and phytogeographical types of these species are identified in the following reference documents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref39">39</xref>] . Phanerophytes (Ph), chamephytes (Ch), hemicryptophytes (He), geophytes (Ge), therophytes (Th) and epiphytes are the categories of biological types considered. Phanerophytes include: megaphanerophytes (MP) (trees over 30 m), mesophanerophytes (mP) (trees 10 to 30 m), microphanerophytes (mp, trees 2 to 10 m), nanophanerophytes (np, trees 0.4 to 2 m), lianaceous forms (Lnp, Lmp, LmP, LMP) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref23">23</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_3"><title>2.3.3. Forest Characteristics Analysis</title><p>Dendrometry parameters such as trees density per hectare (D), mean Lorey height (HL in m), mean diameter (Dm in cm) and basal area (G in m<sup>2</sup>/ha) were calculated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref40">40</xref>] . Tree density (N) is assessed as the number of trees per hectare according to the following formula N = n/s where “n” is the number of trees of DBH ≥ 5 cm on the plot and “s” is the area of the plot in hectares. Basal area (G, m<sup>2</sup>/ha) is the sum of the cross-sections at 1.30 m above the ground of all trees in a plot. It is converted into hectares. It is calculated according to the formula G = Σπd2/4s, where d is the diameter and s is the area of the group. Mean Lorey Height is calculated by averaging tree heights weighted by basal area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref41">41</xref>] .</p><p>The trees are grouped into 10 cm diameter classes and 2 m height classes. Minimum diameter and height are 5 cm and 2 m respectively. The 3 Weibull parameters (a = location parameter, b = scale or size parameter and c = shape parameter related to the diameter or height structure) were used to fit the demographic structures of trees to the theoretical distribution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref37">37</xref>] .</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Land Use Units Dynamic</title><p>Nakpadjouak community forest consisted of two types of land use types in 2014 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Wooded/shrub savannahs is the most common (95.37%). It is followed by croplands/fallows (4.63%). Three types of land use have been identified in 2020. These are wooded/shrub savannahs (77.59%), open forests/wooded savannahs (22.23%) and croplands/fallows (0.18%).</p><p>From 2014 to 2020, the Nakpadjouak community forest was characterised by the emergence of open forests/wooded savannahs. The wooded/shrub savannah</p><p>and the fields/fallows decreased by −17.80% and −4.44% respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Change rate of land use of NCF from 2014 to 2020</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Land use</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2014</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2020</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Change rate</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Area (ha)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Area (ha)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2014-2020</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Croplands/Fallows</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.44</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Open forests/Tree savannahs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wooded/Shrubs savannahs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−17.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The main conversions that took place between 2014 and 2020 are identified by analysing the land use transition matrix for the NCF (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). According to this analysis, 22.22% of wooded savannah/shrubland converted to open forest/wooded savannah and 4.49% of cropland to wooded savannah/shrubland (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Floristic Diversity of NCF</title><p>There are 89 species of plants that have been recorded in the Nakpadjouak community forest (Appendix). These belong to 70 genera and 28 families. The dominant species are: Heteropogon contortus (L.) P.Beauv. and Combretum collinum Fresen., followed by Pteleopsis suberosa Engl. &amp; Diels, Annona senegalensis Pers. (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). The most frequent species are: Lannea acida A.Rich. s.l., A. senegalensis, Vitellaria paradoxa C.F.Gaertner subsp. paradoxa, C. collinum and Acacia dudgeonii Craib ex Holland.</p><p>Fabaceae with 23 species is the most important family. This is followed by Combretaceae (8 species), Rubiaceae (8 species), Poaceae (6 species) and Malvaceae (5 species). Combretaceae, Poaceae and Fabaceae are the most dominant</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Land use transition matrix 2014-2020</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >2020</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >OF/WS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TS/SS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >2014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TS/SS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>C/F: Croplands/Fallows, OF/WS: Open forests/Wooded savannahs, TS/SS: Tree/Shrub savannahs.</p><p>families based on the weighted spectrum (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p><p>Within the NCF, four phytogeographical plant types are represented. Transitional species (GC-SZ, 61.89%) were the most common. They were followed by the Soudano-Zambezian species (SZ, 36.68%). Guineo-Congolese forest and introduced species were rarely present (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). Looking at the raw spectrum based on the number of species per biological type, the trend is the same: 51.81%, 39.33%, 5.62 and 2.25% respectively.</p><p>The weighted as raw spectrum showed that the most represented biological types in the NCF are the microphanerophytes and the nanophanerophytes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). The therophytes are more diversified than the hemicryptophytes. However, they are less abundant than the latter. The other biological types of plants are less abundant and less diversified in the NCF than the hemicryptophytes.</p><p>The NCF floras included one endangered species (Vitellaria paradoxa) and one threatened species (Pterocarpus erinaceus). The IUCN Red List criteria do not apply to almost half of the species (48.31%). A proportion of 43.82% of plants are of low concern.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Description of Plant Communities</title><p>Three plants communities were discriminated in NCF based on the hierarchical ascendant classification (HAC) at 1.3 of Euclidian distance (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>). These are: the plant community of Lannea acida and Combretum collinum (G1), the plant community of Vitellaria paradoxa and Acacia dodgoenii (G2), and the plant community of Vitellaria paraxa and Lannea acida (G3).</p><p>G1 of 5 wooded savannah plots is dominated by Lannea acida and Combretum collinum with IVI 147.15 and 127.28. These are followed by Terminalia avicennioides, Acacia dudgeonii and Combretum molle. A total of 18 species of woody plants were recorded. They belong to 10 families. Anacardiaceae (FIV = 82.80) and Combretaceae (71.67) are the most important families. The family with the greatest diversity is the Fabaceae, with 5 species (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The mean density was 276 stems/ha with a basal area of 3.61 m<sup>2</sup>/ha. The mean height (7.32 m) and mean diameter (12.91 cm) were the lowest.</p><p>G2 included 15 woody plant species recorded in 9 plots of shrub/wood savannahs. With IVI 127.38 and 107.42 respectively, Vitellaria paradoxa and Acacia dudgeonii dominated. Then came Lannea acida. The 15 species are distributed in 6 families. Combretaceae is the most diverse (6 species) and important (FIV, 93.59) family. It is followed by the Fabaceae (FIV, 88.97). The tree density corresponds to 136 stems/ha with 4.00 m<sup>2</sup>/ha. The average total height and diameter are 8.45 m and 19.39 cm respectively.</p><p>There are 6 tree savannah plots in G3. Eight species of woody plants belong to four families in the census. Vitellaria paradoxa and Lannea acida are the</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Importance Value Indices (IVI) of woody species within each plant community</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="11"  >(a)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Groups</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Scientific name</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >DENR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DOM</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >FR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >IVI</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="18"  >G1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Lannea acida A.Rich. s.l.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >22.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >147.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Combretum collinum Fresen.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >15.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Terminalia avicennioides Guill. ex Perr.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >10.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >80.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.98</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Acacia dudgeonii Craib ex Holland</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >13.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >60.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Combretum molle R.Br. ex G.Don</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >8.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >60.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Lannea microcarpa Engl. &amp; K. Krause</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >60.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Vitellaria paradoxa C.F.Gaertner subsp. paradoxa</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >6.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >40.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Sclerocarya birrea (A.Rich.) Hochst.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >5.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >40.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Burkea africana Hook.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >5.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >40.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Boswellia dalzielii Hutch.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >40.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Sterculia setigera Delile</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >20.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Entada abyssinica Steud. ex A.Rich.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >20.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Hexalobus monopetalus (A.Rich.) Engl. &amp; Diels</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >20.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.98</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Strychnos spinosa Lam.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >20.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Prosopis africana (GuilI. &amp; Perr.) Taub.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >20.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Acacia nilotica (L.) Willd. subsp. astringens (Schum. &amp; Thonn.) Rob.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >20.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Bridelia scleroneura M&#252;ll.Arg.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >20.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Azadirachta indica A.Juss.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >20.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="15"  >G2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Vitellaria paradoxa C.F.Gaertner subsp. paradoxa</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >18.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >88.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127.38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Acacia dudgeonii Craib ex Holland</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >20.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >77.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Lannea acida A.Rich. s.l.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >11.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >66.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Combretum molle R.Br. ex G.Don</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >7.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >55.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Terminalia mollis M.A.Lawson</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >10.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >33.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Burkea africana Hook.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >7.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >44.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Prosopis africana (GuilI. &amp; Perr.) Taub.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >11.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Sterculia setigera Delile</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >33.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Anogeissus leiocarpa (DC.) Guill. &amp; Perr.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >9.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >22.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Lannea microcarpa Engl. &amp; K. Krause</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >22.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Terminalia laxifolia Engl.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >22.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Lannea microcarpa Engl. &amp; K. Krause</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >11.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Strychnos spinosa Lam.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >11.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.96</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Combretum collinum Fresen.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >11.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Terminalia avicennioides Guill. ex Perr.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >11.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >G3</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Vitellaria paradoxa C.F.Gaertner subsp. paradoxa</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >44.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >83.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >174.38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Lannea acida A.Rich. s.l.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >25.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >154.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Entada abyssinica Steud. ex A.Rich.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >10.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >50.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Lannea microcarpa Engl. &amp; K. Krause</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >8.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >33.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Pterocarpus erinaceus Poir.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >16.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.27</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Anogeissus leiocarpa (DC.) Guill. &amp; Perr.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >16.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Acacia dudgeonii Craib ex Holland</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >16.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.58</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Terminalia avicennioides Guill. ex Perr.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >16.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="11"  >(b)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Groups</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Families</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DENR</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >DOM</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >DIV</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >FIV</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="10"  >G1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anacardiaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >35.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >16.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >82.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Combretaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >20.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >16.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >71.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fabaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >18.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >27.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >66.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sapotaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >9.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >5.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >21.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sterculiaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >10.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >5.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >17.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Burseraceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >4.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >5.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >11.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Annonaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >5.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >8.54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Loganiaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >5.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >7.37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phyllanthaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >5.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >6.49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Meliaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >5.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >6.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="6"  >G2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Combretaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >20.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >40.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >93.59</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fabaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >40.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >20.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >88.97</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anacardiaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >13.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >20.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >48.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sapotaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >20.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >6.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >45.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sterculiaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >4.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >6.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >13.96</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Loganiaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >6.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >9.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="4"  >G3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sapotaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >46.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >25.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >116.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anacardiaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >40.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >25.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >99.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fabaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >10.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >37.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >64.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Combretaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >12.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >20.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>most important. Their IVI is 174.38 and 154.53 respectively. Sapotaceae (116.01) and Anacardiaceae (99.03) are the most important families. The density is 98 stems/ha. The basal area is 4.08 m<sup>2</sup>/ha. This group has the highest mean total height (9.03 m) and mean diameter (22.99 cm).</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Demographic Structure</title><p>The distribution of trees by diameter class of G1 and G3 has a reversed J-shape, where c &lt; 1 (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>). The distribution is positively asymmetric for G3.</p><p>Young trees are most dominant in these groups. The height distribution of individuals within clusters shows positive asymmetry. The theoretical shape coefficient of the Weibull distribution is between 1 and 3.6. Trees with low height are more represented in this structure.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Land Use Change</title><p>Analysis of Google Earth images of the Nakpadjouak community forest shows a progressive vegetation dynamic between 2014 and 2020. A regression of tree savannah/shrub savannah and fields/fallow land was observed. Tree savannas/shrub savannas have mostly regressed in favour of the open forest/wooded savannah class. Fields and fallows, on the other hand, regressed in favour of wooded savannah/shrub savannah. This result is similar to that of Egbelou et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref31">31</xref>] . He noted a progression of vegetation formations at the expense of fields in the Aboudjokop&#233; forest over the period 2012-2018. The same observation was made by Kombate, B et al. (2023) in the Alibi I community forest. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref16">16</xref>] The appearance of the open forest/forested savannah class in 2020 is due to the conservation measures implemented by the community. These measures have allowed certain parts of the savannah formation to grow and give rise to open forest/wooded savannah. These measures have also allowed certain parts of the fields to be converted to wooded savannah/shrub savannah [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref32">32</xref>] . The result obtained in this study differs from that of Koumoi et al. (2013). They found a regression of vegetation formations in favour of anthropogenic formations. Polo-Akpisso et al. (2015) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref33">33</xref>] also found the same result as Koumoi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref42">42</xref>] in the Oti-Keran-Mandouri National Park.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Floristic Diversity</title><p>The survey of plant life conducted in Nakpadjouak community forest identified a variety of 89 species, classified into 70 genera and 29 families. Similarly, a comparable survey was carried out in a community forest located in the Dankpen prefecture, situated southwards in the same ecological region, yielding 84 species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref32">32</xref>] . The floricule of the NCF is comparatively lower than that of other community forests situated in Togo’s different ecological zones that receive higher amounts of rainfall. In these areas, the NCF’s floricule is only slightly more than double. The Afem-Boussou and Alibi 1 community forests in this ecological zone have a diversity of 163 and 229, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref30">30</xref>] . In ecological zone 4, the floral diversity is lower than what was found by Egbelou et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref31">31</xref>] . Atakpama et al. (2018) recorded diversity of 109, 188, 217 and 264 in the community forests of Edouwossi-Cop&#233;, Agbedougb&#233;, Aboudjokop&#233; and Amav&#233;nou respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref31">31</xref>] . In addition to the more advantageous conditions found in other ecological zones, the size of the forest and the lack of watercourses in the NCF contribute to limited floristic diversity.</p><p>The dominance of Combretaceae followed by Poaceae and Fabaceae characterizes the flora of Nakpadjouak community forest. This tendency points to generally dry climatic conditions in this area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref43">43</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref44">44</xref>] . The prevalence of these families is also documented in numerous studies of the region [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref44">44</xref>] . The prevalence of the Combretaceae family may be attributed to its natural regeneration ability through seedlings, suckering and/or stump sprouting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref45">45</xref>] . Additionally, its abundance highlights the susceptibility of this community forest’s ecosystems to wildfire [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref44">44</xref>] .</p><p>Four biological types were observed, with microphanerophytes being the most common. This prevalence of microphanerophytes has also been recognized by various authors in the same area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref46">46</xref>] . The dominance of microphanerophytes indicates the savannah nature of the vegetation.</p><p>Based on phytogeographic type, the most prominently featured species are the Guineo-Congolese/Sudano-Zamb&#233;zian transition species (61.89%) and Sudano-Zamb&#233;zian species (36.68%). This finding aligns with Atakpama et al. (2021) results and with Dimobe et al.’s (2012) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref23">23</xref>] observation of Sudano-Zambezian species’ dominance in the Oti-Mandouri wildlife reserve.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Demographic Structure</title><p>The horizontal structure in groups G1 and G2 shows an “inverted J” diametric distribution. This result is comparable to that of Kombate et al. (2023) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref47">47</xref>] . This structure reflects the presence of strong anthropogenic pressure in both groups. It also suggests the presence of several future stems to ensure forest reconstitution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref48">48</xref>] . On the other hand, the diametric structure in group G3 shows a positive asymmetric distribution, with a predominance of individuals with diameters between 10 and 20m. This distribution is characteristic of stands with a predominance of small diameter individuals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref49">49</xref>] .</p><p>The distribution is positively asymmetric, with a predominance of individuals between 4 and 6 m tall in groups G1 and G3, and a predominance of individuals between 6 and 8 m tall in group G2. This distribution reflects a strong representation of young, short individuals. This result is similar to that of Kombate, Bimare et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132469-ref47">47</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Spatio-temporal dynamics indicate forest recovery in the Nakpadjouak community forest. A total of 89 plant species, belonging to 70 genera and 29 families, were identified (Appendix). Heteropogon contortus (L.) P.Beauv. and Combretum collinum Fresen, followed by Pteleopsis suberosa Engl. &amp; Diels, Annona senegalensis Pers are the dominant species. Dominant families are Combretaceae, Poaceae and Fabaceae. Nakpadjouak community forest is also home to one endangered (Vitellaria paradoxa) and one threatened (Pterocarpus erinaceus) species. Forest demographic structures indicate a predominance of small-diameter and low-height trees. Protection against pasture use, wood removal and wildfire management are pivotal to forest land sustainability. The promotion of revenue-generating activities will help to the restoration of the forest to its optimal state. The Nakpadjouak community forest is currently undergoing full restoration due to its community management and the support of NGOs. Future studies could assess its carbon storage potential, contribution to mitigating climate change, and ecosystem services provided to the local community.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Author Contributions</title><p>Conceptualization, K.S.E.; methodology, K. S. E., W. A., A. B.; software, K.S.E., W. A.; validation, W.A., E.K., C.A-K.Y. and HvW.; formal analysis, K.S.E., W.A; investigation, K.S.E, W.A.; resources, K.S.E; data curation, K.S.E., W.A.; writing—original draft preparation, K.S.E.; writing—review and editing, K.S.E., HvW, W.A., C.A-K., E.K.; visualization, K.S.E.; supervision, C.A-K, K.E. and H.vW; project administration, K.S.E.; funding acquisition, K.S.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Funding</title><p>This research was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), through the West Africa Science Service Center on Climate change and Adapted Land Use (WASCAL) program.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Data Availability Statement</title><p>WASCAL data is open access and will be made available when a formal request is received by the institution through the Data Administration Unit.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Acknowledgments</title><p>The authors are grateful to the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) for funding this study under the West African Science Service Centre on Climate Change and Adapted Land Use (WASCAL) program. We are grateful to all the stakeholders who invested their time and shared their experiences, and to the anonymous reviewers for their careful reading and comments on this manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s11"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ehlui, S.K., Anthony-Krueger, C., Kola, E., Atakpama, W., Bah, A., von Wehrden, H. and Boukpessi, T. (2024) Mapping and Floristic Diversity of the Nakpadjouak Community Forest, Tami Canton, Togo (West Africa). Natural Resources, 15, 83-105. https://doi.org/10.4236/nr.2024.154007</p></sec><sec id="s12"><title>Appendix: List of Plant Species within Nakpadjouak Community Forest (NCF)</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.132469-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fandjinou, K., Zhang, K., Folega, F., Mukete, B., Yang, X., Wala, K. and Bohnett, E. (2020) Assessment of the Protected Areas Strategy in Togo under Sustainable Management: The Case Study of Oti-Keran, Togodo, and Abdoulaye Faunal Reserve. &lt;i&gt;Open Journal of Ecology&lt;/i&gt;, 10, 141-159. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2020.104010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dudley, N. and Phillips, A. (2006) Forests and Protected Areas&amp;#8239;: Guidance on the Use of the IUCN Protected Area Management Categories. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2006.PAG.12.en</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Atakpama, W., Folega, F., Kpadjao, M.-E. and Amouzou, F.G. (2021) Probl&amp;#233;matique de gestion durable de la biodiversit&amp;#233; des bosquets sacr&amp;#233;s de la R&amp;#233;gion des Savanes au Togo. &lt;i&gt;Synth&amp;#232;se&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;i&gt; Revue des Sciences et de la Technologie&lt;/i&gt;, 27, 22-32. &lt;br&gt;https://www.researchgate.net/profile/wouyo-atakpama/publication/357395577_problematique_de_gestion_durable_de_la_biodiversite_des_bosquets_sacres_de_la_region_des_savanes_au_togo/links/61d360d6b8305f7c4b1edac6/problematique-de-gestion-durable-de-la-biodiv </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adjonou, K., Kpeli Poukpezi, M., Segla, K.N. and Kokou, K. (2021) Impacts of Traditional Practices on Biodiversity and Structural Characteristics of Sacred Groves in Northern Togo, West Africa. &lt;i&gt;Acta Oecologica&lt;/i&gt;, 110, Article ID: 103680. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2020.103680</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sinasson, S., Shackleton, C.M., Teka, O. and Sinsin, B. (2021) Ecological Patterns and Effectiveness of Protected Areas in the Preservation of Mimusops Species&amp;#8217; Habitats under Climate Change. &lt;i&gt;Global Ecology and Conservation&lt;/i&gt;, 27, e01527. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01527</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Agbessi, K.G., Camara, M., Ouedraogo, M., Segniagbeto, H., Houngbedji, M.B., Kabre, A.T. and Abomey-calavi, U. (2017) Spatial Distribution of Primate Species in the Protected Area Togodo in Togo and Threats to Their Sustainable Conservation. &lt;i&gt;International Journal of Current Research&lt;/i&gt;, 9, 61767-61775. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v11i1.13&lt;br&gt;https://www.journalcra.com/sites/default/files/issue-pdf/27368.pdf </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koumantiga, D., Wala, K., Diwediga, B., Kanda, M., Dourma, M., Batawila, K. and Akpagana, K. (2022) Biological Based Ecotourism Potential in the Complex of Protected Areas Oti-Keran-Mandouri (Togo, West Africa). &lt;i&gt;Journal of Ecotourism&lt;/i&gt;, 21, 18-36. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/14724049.2021.1914065</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mbise Franco, P., Moshi, B. and R&amp;#248;skaft, E. (2021) Impact of Protected Areas on the Livelihood of Locals: A Case Study in Saadani National Park, Tanzania. &lt;i&gt;Intern&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;tional Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation&lt;/i&gt;, 13, 98-108. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.5897/IJBC2021.1474</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Badjare, B., Woegan, Y.A., Folega, F. and Atakpama, W. (2021) Vuln&amp;#233;rabilit&amp;#233; Des Ressources Ligneuses En Lien Avec Les Diff&amp;#233;rentes Formes D&amp;#8217;Usages Au Togo: Cas Du Paysage Des Aires Prot&amp;#233;g&amp;#233;es Doungh-Fosse Aux Lions (R&amp;#233;gion Des Savanes). &lt;i&gt;Revue Agrobiologia&lt;/i&gt;, 11, 2552-2565. &lt;br&gt;https://www.asjp.cerist.dz/en/downArticle/255/11/2/173028 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dimobe, K., Goetze, D., Ou&amp;#233;draogo, A., Forkuor, G., Wala, K., Porembski, S. and Thiombiano, A. (2017) Spatio-Temporal Dynamics in Land Use and Habitat Fragmentation within a Protected Area Dedicated to Tourism in a Sudanian Savanna of West Africa. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Landscape Ecology&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;(&lt;i&gt;Czech Republic&lt;/i&gt;), 10, 75-95. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1515/jlecol-2017-0011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Atakpama, W., Badjare, B., Yawo, E., Aladji, K. and Batawila, K. (2023) Alarming Degradation of Forest Resources in the Classified Forest of Doungh Pit in Togo. &lt;i&gt;African Journal on Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences&lt;/i&gt;, 6, 2657-2664.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kokou, K.B., Atakpama, W., Kombate, B., Egbelou, H. and Koffi, N.A. (2023) Dynamique et mod&amp;#233;lisation du stock de carbone de la For&amp;#234;t Class&amp;#233;e d&amp;#8217;Amou-Mono au Togo. &lt;i&gt;Revue Ecosyst&amp;#232;mes et Paysages&lt;/i&gt;, 3, 1-16.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Onyekwelu, J.C., Lawal, A., Mosandl, R., Stimm, B. and Agbelade, A.D. (2021) Understory Species Diversity, Regeneration and Recruitment Potential of Sacred Groves in South West Nigeria. &lt;i&gt;Tropical Ecology&lt;/i&gt;, 62, 427-442. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s42965-021-00157-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Atakpama, W., Badjare, B., Woegan, Y.A., Amouzou, F.G., Kpadjao, M. and Akpagana, K. (2022) Ecologie des bosquets sacr&amp;#233;s de la pr&amp;#233;fecture de Tone dans la R&amp;#233;gion des Savanes au Togo. &lt;i&gt;Revue Espace Geographique et Societe Marocaine&lt;/i&gt;, 56, 23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Atakpama, W., Egbelou, H., Samarou, M. and Fousseni, F. (2023) La foresterie communautaire au Togo: O&amp;#249; en sommes-nous? &lt;i&gt;Revue Marocaine Des Sciences Agronomiques et V&amp;#233;t&amp;#233;rinaires&lt;/i&gt;, 11, 532-543.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kombate, B., Atakpama, W., Egbelou, H., Ahuide, K., Dourma, M., Folega, F. and Akpagana, K. (2023) Dynamique de l&amp;#8217;occupation de sol et mod&amp;#233;lisation du carbone de la For&amp;#234;t Communautaire d&amp;#8217;Alibi 1. &lt;i&gt;Annale de La Recherche Foresti&amp;#232;re En Alg&amp;#233;rie&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;13, 13-26. &lt;br&gt;https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370316919_Dynamique_de_l&amp;#8217;occupation_de_sol_et_modelisation_du_carbone_de_la_Foret_Communautaire_d&amp;#8217;Alibi_1 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mbarga, H.N. (2013) La gestion des for&amp;#234;ts communautaires face au d&amp;#233;fi de la pauvret&amp;#233; et du d&amp;#233;veloppement rural. &lt;i&gt;VertigO&lt;/i&gt;, 13, 60. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.14448</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zandersen, M. and Tol, R.S.J. (2009) A Meta-Analysis of Forest Recreation Values in Europe. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Forest Economics&lt;/i&gt;, 15, 109-130. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2008.03.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Quintano, P.N. and Barredo, J.I. (2015) A Database of the Recreational Value of European Forests.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rametsteiner, E. and Kraxner, F. (2003) Europeans and Their Forests: What do Europeans Think about Forests and Sustainable Forest Management? In: &lt;i&gt;Ministerial &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe&lt;/i&gt; (pp. 1-55). &lt;br&gt;https://foresteurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/LU_Europeans_Forest.pdf  </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kokou, K. and Sokpon, N. (2006) Les for&amp;#234;ts sacr&amp;#233;es du couloir du Dahomey. &lt;i&gt;Bois et For&amp;#234;ts Des Tropiques&lt;/i&gt;, 288, 15-23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Atakpama, W., Egbelou, H., Kombate, B., Biaou, S. and Batawila, K. (2023) Diversit&amp;#233; et structure des formations v&amp;#233;g&amp;#233;tales de la for&amp;#234;t communautaire d&amp;#8217;Alibi-1 au Togo. &lt;i&gt;Synth&amp;#232;se&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;i&gt; Revue des Sciences et de la Technologie&lt;/i&gt;, 29, 6-20. &lt;br&gt;https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376613510
diversit&amp;#233; </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dimobe, K., Wala, K., Batawila, K., Dourma, M., Woegan, Y.A. and Akpagana, K. (2012) Analyse spatiale des diff&amp;#233;rentes formes de pressions anthropiques dans la r&amp;#233;serve de faune de l&amp;#8217;Oti-Mandouri (Togo). &lt;i&gt;VertigO&lt;/i&gt;, 14, 1-22. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.12423</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Folega, F., Marra, D., Wala, K., Batawila, K., Zhang, C., Zhao, X. and Akpagana, K. (2012) Assessment and Impact of Anthropogenic Disturbances in Protected Areas of Northern Togo. &lt;i&gt;Forestry Studies in China&lt;/i&gt;, 14, 216-223. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11632-012-0308-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Polo-Akpisso, A., Folega, F., Soulemane, O., Atakpama, W., Coulibaly, M., Wala, K. and Yao, T. (2018) Habitat Biophysical and Spatial Patterns Assessment within Oti-Keran-Mandouri Protected Area Network in Togo. &lt;i&gt;International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation&lt;/i&gt;, 10, 214-229. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.5897/IJBC2017.1139</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Folega, F., Pereki, H., Woegan, Y. A., Dourma, M., Atakpama, W., Maza, M.S. and Akpagana, K. (2017) Caract&amp;#233;risation &amp;#233;cologique de la Foret Communautaire d&amp;#8217;Edouwossi-Cope (r&amp;#233;gion des Plateaux-Togo). &lt;i&gt;Journal de la Recherche Scientifique de l&lt;/i&gt;&amp;#8217;&lt;i&gt;Universit&amp;#233; de Lom&amp;#233; &lt;/i&gt;(&lt;i&gt;Togo&lt;/i&gt;), 19, 47-61. &lt;br&gt;https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jrsul/article/view/167465/156879 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Atakpama, W., Asseki, E., Kpemissi Amana, E., Koudegnan, C., Batawila, K. and Akpagana, K. (2018) Importance socio-&amp;#233;conomique de la for&amp;#234;t communautaire d&amp;#8217;Edouwossi-cop&amp;#233; dans la pr&amp;#233;fecture d&amp;#8217;Amou au Togo. &lt;i&gt;Revue Marocaine Des Sciences Agronomiques et V&amp;#233;t&amp;#233;rinaires&lt;/i&gt;, 6, 55-63.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ern</surname><given-names> H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1979</year>)<article-title>Die Vegetation Togos. Gliederung, Gef&amp;#228;hrdung, Erhaltung</article-title><source> &lt;i&gt;Willd&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;e&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;nowi&lt;/i&gt;</source><volume> 9</volume>,<fpage> 295</fpage>-<lpage>312</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brunel, J.F., Hiepko, P. and Scholz, H. (1984) Flore analytique du Togo: Phanerogames. &lt;i&gt;Englera&lt;/i&gt;, No. 4, 3-751. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.2307/3776742</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Folega, F., Badjare, B., Tchabi, M., Kamara, M., Atakpama, W., Issifou, A. and Akpagana, K. (2023) Land Use Change and the Structural Diversity of Affem Boussou Community Forest in the Tchamba 1 Commune (Tchamba Prefecture, Togo). &lt;i&gt;Conservation&lt;/i&gt;, 3, 346-362. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation3030024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Egbelou, H., Atakpama, W., Dourma, M. and Akpagana, K. (2021) Dynamique spatio-temporelle et flore de la for&amp;#234;t d&amp;#8217;Aboudjokop&amp;#233; au Togo. &lt;i&gt;Revue des Sciences et de la Technologie&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; Synthese&lt;/i&gt;, 27, 37-50. &lt;br&gt;https://www.ajol.info/index.php/srst/article/view/220712/208259 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Atakpama, W., Egbelou, H., Folega, F., Afo, C., Batawila, K. and Akpagana, K. (2022) Diversit&amp;#233; floristique des for&amp;#234;ts communautaires de la pr&amp;#233;fecture de Dankpen au Togo. &lt;i&gt;Revue Marocaine Des Sciences Agronomiques et V&amp;#233;t&amp;#233;rinaires&lt;/i&gt;, 10, 548-557. &lt;br&gt;https://www.agrimaroc.org/index.php/actes_iavh2/article/download/1222/1675/ </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Polo-Akpisso, A., Wala, K., Ouattara, S., Woegan, Y., Coulibaly, M., Atato, A. and Akpagana, K. (2015) Plant Species Characteristics and Woody Plant Community Types within the Historical Range of Savannah Elephant, &lt;i&gt;Loxodonta africana&lt;/i&gt; Blumenbach 1797 in Northern Togo (West Africa). &lt;i&gt;Annual Research &amp; Review in Biology&lt;/i&gt;, 7, 283-299. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.9734/ARRB/2015/19271</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thiombiano, A., Gl&amp;#232;l&amp;#232;-Kakai, R., Bayen, P., Boussim, J.I. and Mahamane, A. (2015) M&amp;#233;thodes et dispositifs d&amp;#8217;inventaires forestiers en Afrique de l&amp;#8217;Ouest: Etat des lieux et propositions pour une harmonisation. &lt;i&gt;Annales Des Sciences Agronomiques&lt;/i&gt;, 19, 15-31. &lt;br&gt;https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301327616
m&amp;#233;thodes </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Atakpama, W., Agbetanu, K.M.W., Atara, L.L., Biaou, S., Batawila, K. and Akpagana, K. (2021) Biodiversit&amp;#233; et gestion des feux de v&amp;#233;g&amp;#233;tation dans la r&amp;#233;serve de faune d&amp;#8217;Abdoulaye au Togo. &lt;i&gt;Revue des Sciences et de la Technologie&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; Synth&amp;#232;se&lt;/i&gt;, 27, 51-64. &lt;br&gt;https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357407273
Biodiversit&amp;#233; </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Blanquet-Braun, J. (1933) Title: Plant Sociology: The Study of Plant Communities.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Samarou, M., Atakpama, W., Fousseni, F., Dourma, M., Wala, K., Batawila, K. and Akpagana, K. (2022) Caract&amp;#233;risation &amp;#233;cologique et structurale des parcs &amp;#224; tamarinier (&lt;i&gt;Tamarindus indica&lt;/i&gt; L., Fabaceae) dans la zone soudanienne du Togo (Afrique del&amp;#8217;Ouest). &lt;i&gt;Revue Ecosyst&amp;#232;mes et Paysages&lt;/i&gt;, 2, 109-125. &lt;br&gt;https://agrimaroc.org/index.php/actes_iavh2/article/view/1155 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">White, F. (1986) La vegetation de l&amp;#8217;Afrique. ORSTOM-UNESCO, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Assi-Ake, L. (1985) Reviews and Announcements. &lt;i&gt;Taxon&lt;/i&gt;, 34, 739-753. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.2307/1222240</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bawa, D.M., Wala, K., Folega, F. and Akpagana, K. (2022) Caract&amp;#233;ristiques floristiques et structurales de la for&amp;#234;t communautaire d&amp;#8217;Agbandi au centre du Togo (Afrique de l&amp;#8217;ouest). &lt;i&gt;Rev &amp;#201;cosyst&amp;#232;mes et Paysages &lt;/i&gt;(&lt;i&gt;Togo&lt;/i&gt;), 2, 55-74. &lt;br&gt;https://lbev-univlome.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Bawa-et-al21.2022.pdf </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">West, P.W. (2004) Tree and Forest Measurement. Springer, Berlin. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05436-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koumoi, Z., Alassane, A., Djangbedja, M., Boukpessi, T. and Kouya, A.-E. (2013) Dynamique spatio-temporelle de l&amp;#8217;occupation du sol dans le centre-Togo. &lt;i&gt;Revue de G&amp;#233;ographie Du LARDYMES&lt;/i&gt;,&lt;i&gt; Universit&amp;#233; de Lom&amp;#233;&lt;/i&gt;, 7, 163-172.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aubreville, A. (1950) Flore foresti&amp;#232;re foresti&amp;#232;re soudano-guin&amp;#233;enne: A.O.F.-Cameroun-A.E.F. (Societe d&amp;#8217;). Office de la recherche scientifique d&amp;#8217;Outre mer, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Atakpama, W., Amegnaglo, K.B., Afelu, B., Folega, F., Batawila, K. and Akpagana, K. (2019) Biodiversit&amp;#233; et biomasse pyrophyte au Togo. &lt;i&gt;VertigO&lt;/i&gt;, 19, 21. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.27000</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bellefontaine</surname><given-names> R. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2005</year>)<article-title>Pour de nombreux ligneux, la reproduction sexu&amp;#233;e n&amp;#8217;est pas la seule voie analyse de 875 cas</article-title><source> &lt;i&gt;S&amp;#233;cheresse&lt;/i&gt;</source><volume> 16</volume>,<fpage> 315</fpage>-<lpage>317</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdourhamane, H., Morou, B., Rabiou, H. and Amhamane, A. (2013) Caract&amp;#233;ristiques floristiques, diversit&amp;#233; et structure de la v&amp;#233;g&amp;#233;tation ligneuse dans le Centre-Sud du Niger: Cas du complexe des for&amp;#234;ts class&amp;#233;es de Dan kada Dodo-Dan Gado. &lt;i&gt;Intern&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;tional Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences&lt;/i&gt;, 7, 1048. &lt;br&gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v7i3.13</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kombate, B., Atakpama, W., Egbelou, H., Yandja, M., Bawa, A., Dourma, M. and Akpagana, K. (2023) Structure et mod&amp;#233;lisation du carbone de la For&amp;#234;t Class&amp;#233;e de Missahoho&amp;#233; au Togo. &lt;i&gt;African Journal on Land Policy and Geospatial &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Sciences&lt;/i&gt;, 6, 42-61.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tsoumou, B.R., Lumand&amp;#233;, K.J., Kamp&amp;#233;, J.P. and Nzila, J.D. (2016) Estimation de la quantit&amp;#233; de carbone s&amp;#233;questr&amp;#233; par la For&amp;#234;t Mod&amp;#232;le de Dimonika (Sud-ouest de la R&amp;#233;publique du Congo). &lt;i&gt;Revue Scientifique et Technique For&amp;#234;t &amp;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Environnement &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Du Bassin Du Congo&lt;/i&gt;, 6, 39-45. &lt;br&gt;https://dicames.online/jspui/handle/20.500.12177/1902 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132469-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kebenzikato, A.B., Wala, K., Dourma, M., Atakpama, W., Dimobe, K., Pereki, H. and Laboratoire (2014) Distribution et structure des parcs &amp;#224; Adansonia digitata L.(baobab) au Togo (Afrique de l&amp;#8217;Ouest). &lt;i&gt;Afrique SCIENCE&lt;/i&gt;, 10, 434-449. &lt;br&gt;http://www.ajol.info/index.php/afsci/article/view/109682</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>