<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1111332</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-132248</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Determinants of Non-Use of Insecticide-Treated Mosquito Nets among Pregnant Women and Children under Five Years Old at the Dikungu General Reference Hospital
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Antoine</surname><given-names>Dikoke Oleko Djamba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nicolas</surname><given-names>Pengolongo Okitokako</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Louise</surname><given-names>Dikomaki Ohandjo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Oscar</surname><given-names>Milambo Okongeme</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nestor</surname><given-names>Ngoy Kankienza</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Higher Institute of Medical Techniques of Tshumbe (ISTM Tshumbe), Lumumba, Democratic Republic of Congo</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>03</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>11</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>20,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2024</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Objective: The main objective of this study is to identify the determinants of non-use of insecticide-treated mosquito nets among pregnant women and children under five years old at the Dikungu General Reference Hospital. 
  Methods: For this study, we used the cross-sectional correlational method, through an interview questionnaire among pregnant women and children under five years old at the Dikungu HGR. Data analysis was carried out using SPSS Version 25 software. 
  Results: This study found the following results: A predominance (58.1%) of the female sex, married women were in the majority (38.7%), 24% had a secondary education level, while female employees presented 26.7%, the majority (71.3%) were Catholic, 32.7% did not use the insecticide-treated mosquito net and 59.2% said the insecticide-treated mosquito net was unavailable; the most obvious reason (51.7%) is that they don’t like it, the majority (94%) accepted having received information on the importance of insecticide-treated mosquito net, and the most frequent channel (64.1%) was community relays. Finally, a statistically significant difference was revealed between the use of insecticide-treated mosquito net and the level of education (χ2 = 10.9; p &lt; 0.03), and a statistically significant link between the use of insecticide-treated mosquito net and information on the importance of insecticide-treated mosquito net (χ2 = 20; p &lt; 0.000). 
  Conclusion: The following determinants of non-use of insecticide-treated mosquito nets were identified: Low level of education and insufficient information on the usefulness of insecticide-treated mosquito nets. Promoting the education of pregnant women and mothers of children under five years old is essential in resolving the problem of non-use of insecticide-treated mosquito nets at the Dikungu HGR.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Determinants</kwd><kwd> Mosquito Net</kwd><kwd> Pregnant Women and Children</kwd><kwd> Dikungu HGR</kwd><kwd> DRC</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Background</title><p>Malaria (or malaria) is a febrile and haemolysing erythrocytopathy caused by a hematozoan: The female Anopheles of the Culicidae family and the Anopheles genus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132248-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>Today, malaria is the leading parasitic disease worldwide and a public health problem that threatens more than 2.4 billion people, or nearly 40% of the world’s population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132248-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>Malaria infection during pregnancy is one of the most dangerous forms of malaria and threatens pregnant women living in all tropical and subtropical regions. Some 50 million pregnant women are exposed to malaria each year, at least 60% of them in Africa, and falciparum malaria infection during pregnancy causes more than 500,000 infant deaths per year [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132248-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>In Africa, malaria accounts for the vast majority of deaths, south of the Sahara, where this disease also poses a serious obstacle to economic and social development. It is estimated that more than 12 billion dollars are lost annually due to malaria, although a fraction of this sum would be enough to control it. There are at least 300,000 million acute cases of malaria each year. About 90% of deaths occur in Africa, mainly among young children under five years (20%) and it represents 10% of the total disease burden [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132248-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132248-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), every year, malaria claims many victims. Much more than a public health problem, malaria constitutes a significant socio-economic burden in our country, while a large part of the population is deprived. As a result, it contributes to the process of impoverishment of populations but also and above all reduces and deprives productivity and by depriving communities of the means allocated to the care of patients. Malaria kills 180,000 people each year in the DRC and affects nearly a third of the population.</p><p>Despite this worrying panorama, it has taken a long time for a global initiative to be concerned with reducing malaria. Politicians have long remained deaf to the calls of experts who deplored the high mortality, especially before the age of five and the impact of the disease on pregnant women: mortality, abortion, anemia, low birth weight of children, etc. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132248-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132248-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>Since then, the insecticide-impregnated mosquito net has been a simple mechanical protection, very effectively limiting human-vector contact, and therefore transmission when it is at its maximum, that is to say at night. Despite the inconvenience that it can represent in hot and humid regions, its effectiveness has long been recognized, even if it does not prevent all contact between the mosquito and the sleeper, particularly in the event of misuse and tearing. However, an intact mosquito net forces the mosquito to seek its meal elsewhere, most often at home and sometimes on a different host [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132248-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>The Dikungu General Reference Hospital is among the places where malaria is very high, accentuated by the socio-economic crisis having a negative impact on the lives of its inhabitants.</p><p>To this end, we have noticed on the one hand the frequent cases of malaria, anemia, high morbidity in children under five years of age, abortions, situations that can be avoided by promoting the use of mosquito nets and On the other hand, the non-use of mosquito nets in certain families. This is why for this study we set ourselves the objective of identifying the determinants of non-use of mosquito nets among pregnant women and children under five years old at the Dikungu General Reference Hospital. To achieve this, the following specific objectives were defined: determine the rates of availability and use of insecticide-treated mosquito nets among pregnant women and children under five years of age, identify the factors associated with non-use of mosquito nets impregnated with insecticide at the General Reference Hospital of Dikungu and make some suggestions with a view to improving the situation of use of mosquito nets impregnated with insecticide.</p><p>The framework of this paper has four points. The first, the introduction, which demonstrates the interest and objectives of the study, the second, explains the material used and the methodology followed, the third presents the results of the survey carried out in the field, the fourth finally, engages a discussion with a view to making the data in this field of study intelligible. A brief conclusion ends this study.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Framework</title><p>The Dikungu General Reference Hospital (Dikungu HGR) is located in the Dikungu Reference Health Zone in the Katako-Kombe territory, Sankuru province, in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). This leper colony was created in 1979 by Belgian missionaries. In 1989, that is to say 10 years after its creation, it became the Dikungu HGR in the Dikungu Health Zone. Since its creation in 1979, it was prohibited to treat other categories of diseases apart from leprosy, tuberculosis, and trypanosomiasis. From 1988 the Zairian State ceded the management of the latter to a Non-profit Association (ASBL) called “Health for the Well-being of Sankuru (SABSA)” for a renewable 4-year mandate and in the hands of the Catholic Church since 1992 to the present day [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132248-ref9">9</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Type and Period of Study</title><p>The present study was cross-sectional and took place from March 6 to July 28, 2023.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Study Population</title><p>The population for this study consisted of all pregnant women and children under five years old served by the Dikungu HGR and living in the Dikungu Health Zone.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Sampling</title><p>For this study, we opted for the exhaustive sampling technique which consists of counting all individuals meeting the selection criteria. For this study, the sample size was 150 respondents, including 64 pregnant women and 86 children under five years old.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Collection of Data</title><p>The data for this study were collected by a group of 4 nurses from the Dikungu HGR who were previously trained using the data collection instrument. The following variables were taken into account: sex for children, age, level of education, marital status, economic situation, religion, use of insecticide-treated mosquito net, reasons for unavailability of insecticide-treated mosquito net, information on the importance of insecticide-treated mosquito net, the information channel, and other reasons.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Statistical Analysis</title><p>The data collected from this study were entered and analyzed using SPSS Version 25 software. For the search for links between the dependent variable (the use of insecticide-treated mosquito net) and the independent variables, the Pearson Chi-square test has been used.</p><p>For each binary variable retained, the relative risk (RR) with its 95% confidence interval was calculated. The value p &lt; 5% was at the threshold of statistical significance. * = p &lt; 0.05; ** = p &lt; 0.01; *** &lt; 0.001; NS = not significant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132248-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132248-ref11">11</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Ethical Considerations</title><p>For this study, the confidentiality of the responses or information was guaranteed, to reassure that the information was anonymous, we did not provide for the transcription of the names of the respondents on the survey questionnaire, however, an identification number was given to each copy of the survey questionnaire.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>We recall here once again, this study included a total of 150 respondents including 64 pregnant women and 86 children. Below, we present the results of the determinants of non-use of insecticide-treated mosquito nets at the Dikungu General Reference Hospital. It appears from these results that the median age of the respondents was 12.58 years with the extremes of 1 to 45 years.</p><p>The analysis made in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows among the children, a predominance (58.1%) of the female sex, married women were the majority (38.7%) among the women surveyed.</p><p>Reading <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, it is revealed that 24% of the respondents had a secondary level of education, while the employeds presented a proportion of 26.7%, finally the majority of the respondents (71.3%) were Catholics.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of respondents according to socio-demographic characteristics</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >n (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Gender (child)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 (41.9)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 (58.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86 (100.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2. Civil status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (4.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Married</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58 (38.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Children</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86 (57.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150 (100.0)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of respondents according to economic and cultural characteristics</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >n (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Level of education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (1.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Primary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (4.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Secondary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 (24.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Academic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 (12.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Child</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86 (57.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150 (100.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Profession</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Unemployed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 (16.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Employed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 (26.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Child</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86 (57.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150 (100.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3. Religion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Catholic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107 (71.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Protestant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 (20.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Kimbanguiste</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (0.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Others</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (8.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150 (100.0)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> indicates that 32.7% of respondents did not use the insecticide-treated mosquito net and 59.2% of them said that the insecticide-treated mosquito net was unavailable. The most obvious reason (51.7%) is that they don’t like it.</p><p>The analysis carried out in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> reveals that the majority (94%) of respondents accepted having received information on the importance of insecticide-treated mosquito net, and the most frequent channel (64.1%) was the community relays.</p><p>It appears from <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> that there is a statistically significant difference between the use of insecticide-treated mosquito net and the level of studies (χ<sup>2</sup> = 10.9; p &lt; 0.03), it is also established a statistically significant link between the use of insecticide-treated mosquito net and information on the importance of insecticide-treated mosquito net (χ<sup>2</sup> = 20; p &lt; 0.000).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of respondents according to the determinants of non-use of insecticide-treated mosquito net</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >n (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Use of insecticide-treated mosquito net</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101 (67.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49 (32.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150 (100.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2. Reasons for not using insecticide-treated mosquito net</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- insecticide-treated mosquito net unavailable</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29 (59.2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- insecticide-treated mosquito net available</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (40.8)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49 (100.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3. Reasons for the unavailability of insecticide-treated mosquito net</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Lack of resources</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (13.8)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Does not like insecticide-treated mosquito net</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 (51.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Did not receive during distribution</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (24.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Without reason</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (3.5)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Other reasons</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (6.9)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29 (100.0)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of respondents according to the determinants linked to information on insecticide-treated mosquito net</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >n (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Information on the importance of insecticide-treated mosquito net</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 (94.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (6.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64 (100.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2. Information channel</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Media</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (4.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Community relay</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 (64.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Health structure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (25.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Other channel</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (6.2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64 (100.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3. Other reasons for not using insecticide-treated mosquito net</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Tight room</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 (30.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Discomfort</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (16.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Without pattern</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (8.2)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Other reasons</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (44.9)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49 (100.0)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Relationship between insecticide-treated mosquito net use and other variables</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >The use of insecticide-treated mosquito net</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >IC [95%]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >χ<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p&lt;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Level of education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Primary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Secondary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Academic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2. Information on the importance of insecticide-treated mosquito net</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[1.07 - 1.39]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >***</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Resistance against malaria remains a worldwide concern. For this purpose, the mosquito net impregnated with insecticide occupies a noble place, especially among pregnant women and children under five years old.</p><p>This study was carried out at the HGR of Dikungu in the Lokombe Sector, Katako-Kombe territory, in the Democratic Republic of Congo. It affected children under five years old and pregnant women. A total of 150 respondents include 64 pregnant women and 86 children under five years old.</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Economic and Cultural Characteristics</title><p>In this study it was revealed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> that 24% of the respondents had a secondary level of education and that employees presented a proportion of 26.7% and the majority of these respondents (71.3%) were Catholics.</p><p>These results are not surprising because, in the DRC, the population has a precarious economic situation, the majority of the population strives to have at least a state diploma (secondary education). Few people have the means to complete their studies at university level. The majority of Catholics could be explained by the fact that the Catholic Church was the first church to emerge in the DRC, and as there were no other churches, the majority of the population who wanted to worship God did not should only be done by the Catholic Church. These results are contrary to those obtained by Souma&#239;la Abolou Ma&#239;ga (2004), stating that Mali is a developing country with a population level of education that still remains low, particularly with regard to women. During his study, it emerged that mothers or caregivers of children under five years old were mainly illiterate with 66.9%. This illiteracy rate is lower than that obtained by Ma&#239;ga in the Banolangara circle, respectively 92.5% and Saffe, 83% in the Sikasso circle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132248-ref12">12</xref>] . These results are confirmed by other authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132248-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132248-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>This difference could easily be explained by the level of reasoning that in the DRC, many people do not have access to the country’s wealth and therefore to be almost balanced, one must go to school. The Dikungu HGR is in the center which is full of many primary and secondary schools. But above all by the free primary education in the DRC where everyone is supposed to have completed primary studies, to approach secondary studies which currently cost less and less, whereas in Mali these studies would be expensive compared to our study environment.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Determinants Linked to Non-Use of Insecticide-Treated Mosquito Net</title><p>The analysis made in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> showed that 32.7% of respondents do not use the insecticide-treated mosquito net, 59.2% of them affirmed that the insecticide-treated mosquito net was unavailable and 51.7% did not appreciate its use. These results show why some people in the Dikungu Health Zone are wary of using insecticide-treated mosquito net; this is due to insufficient awareness among this population of the importance of insecticide-treated mosquito net in the fight against malaria.</p><p>These results are almost contrary to those of Mohamed Seydou Cisse (2009), during his study, he found that 90.7% of children under five years old would have a mosquito net impregnated with insecticide. We did not find reasons for unavailability in 37.5%, however 31.2% indicated that they did not like mosquito nets impregnated with insecticide and 18.8% cited a lack of resources [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132248-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>This wide availability could be explained by the Government’s policy which consisted of distributing insecticide-treated mosquito nets free of charge to children under five years old during the vaccination campaign, and to pregnant women during prenatal consultations.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Relationship between the Use of Insecticide-Treated Mosquito Nets and Other Variables</title><p>Here, it was revealed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>, that there is a statistically significant difference between the use of insecticide-treated mosquito net and the level of education (χ<sup>2</sup> = 10.9; p &lt; 0.03), a statistically significant link is also established between the use of insecticide-treated mosquito nets and the importance of information on the usefulness of insecticide-treated mosquito nets (χ<sup>2</sup> = 20; p &lt; 0.000).</p><p>These results could be explained by the fact that if people do not have information on the usefulness of insecticide-treated mosquito net, they would be resistant to using it, on the other hand good awareness would be useful to persuade the population of the Dikungu Health Zone to make good use of it. A low level of education would be a determining factor in the non-use of insecticide-treated mosquito nets. The illiterate person would not know the importance of IBD, and is supposed to blame the occurrence of the disease on bad luck or witchcraft.</p><p>These results are entirely consistent with those of Ulrich Thomas Bakedeck (2011), having shown that the level of education is significantly associated with the non-use of insecticide-treated mosquito nets. We note that the prevalence of non-use of insecticide-treated mosquito nets is higher among pregnant women with no education level (92.7%), followed by those with primary education (87%), and finally, secondary level and above (83.7%). To explain this differential, one could think that women without a level of education are less open to modernity, they attend health facilities less for prenatal consultations, and they are less informed about the healthy behaviors to adopt during pregnancy to prevent malaria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.132248-ref2">2</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>The results of this study show that some pregnant women and children do not use the insecticide-treated mosquito net. The determinants identified for the non-use of insecticide-treated mosquito nets in this study are: low level of education, and insufficient information on the usefulness of insecticide-treated mosquito nets.</p><p>The intensification of well-planned and adapted communication sessions for behavior change, the development of literacy programs intended for pregnant women with emphasis on health education which would enable them to adopt behaviors favorable to their survival and that of their children are appropriate measures to overcome the situation of non-use of insecticide-treated mosquito nets.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Here our thanks are particularly addressed to the authorities and health personnel working at the Dikungu General Reference Hospital for the authorizations granted and for the collection of data.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Authors’ Contributions</title><p>DIKOKE OLEKO DJAMBA Antoine the designer of the study, PENGOLONGO OKITOKAKO Nicolas, DIKOMAKI OHANDJO Louise, MILAMBO OKONGEMA Oscar, all scientific staff from the Higher Institute of Medical Techniques of Tshumbe working at the General Reference Hospital of dikungu participated in data collection and each gave a critical opinion on the content of the study. NGOY KANKIENZA Nestor participated in the analysis of the data and in giving the meaning of the results found.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Dikoke Oleko Djamba, A., Pengolongo Okitokako, N, Dikomaki Ohandjo, L., Milambo Okongeme, O. and Ngoy Kankienza, N. (2024) Determinants of Non-Use of Insecticide-Treated Mosquito Nets among Pregnant Women and Children under Five Years Old at the Dikungu General Reference Hospital. Open Access Library Journal, 11: e11332. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1111332</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.132248-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mazier, D. (1991) Plasmodium Cycle and Biology. Malaria Université Franco-UREF, Edition Ellipses Paris, 25-51.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132248-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bakedeck, U.T. (2011) The Explanatory Factors of the Non-Use of the Mosquito Net by Pregnant Women in Cameroon. Institute of Research and Training in Demography, Cameroon.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132248-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Unicef (2007) Malaria and Children. 75. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/619117</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132248-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WHO (2014) World Health Statistics 2011. 177. https://www.who.int/fr/publications/i/item/9789241564199</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132248-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akoto, E., et al. (2002) Treating Yourself Today in West Africa: Therapeutic Pluralism between Tradition and Modernity (Benin, Ivory Coast and Mali). Yaoundé (Cameroon), IFORD Notebook N°27, 169.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132248-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Le Bras, M. and Malvy, D. (2004) Malaria at a Time of Roll Back Malaria. Médecine Tropical, N°64, 576-578.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132248-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Didier, M. (2015) An Introduction to Health Psychology, French Version, Book Edition, 243.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132248-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Darret (2007) Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Populations Facing Malaria in the Health Hour of Finkolo (Sikasso). Thesis of Medicine Bamako, 68.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132248-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dikoke, A. (2015) Epidemiology of Sexually Transmitted Infections at the Dikungu General Reference Hospital, Community Health Memory, ISTM Tshumbe, Sankuru-RDC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132248-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ancelle, T. (2006) Epidemiology Statistics, ed. Maloine-23, Rue de l’école de l’école de santé 75006, Paris-France.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132248-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abbass, H.A. (2015) Computational Red Teaming: Risk Analytics of Big-Data-to-Decisions Intelligent Systems. In: Computational Red Teaming: Risk Analytics of Big-Data-to-Decisions Intelligent Systems, Springer International, New York, 211-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08281-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132248-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maiga, S.A. (2004) Attitudes and Behaviors of Populations towards Malaria in the Kindié Health Hour (Cercle of Bandiagara). Thesis Med Bamako, 84.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132248-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Christian, L., et al. (2015) A Wall against Malaria: Something New in the Prevention of Deaths from Malaria. International Development Research Center, Ottawa, Geneva, Switzerland.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132248-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kiniffi, I.R., et al. (2000) Mothers of Children under Five and Malaria in the Dangbo Valley in Southeastern Benin. Black African Medicine, n°47, 27-33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.132248-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cisse, M.S. (2009) Determinants of the Non-Use of Insecticide-Treated Mosquito Nets among Children under Five Years Old in the District of Bamako. Thesis/University of Bamako, Faculty of Medicine.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>