<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ojas</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Open Journal of Animal Sciences</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2161-7627</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2161-7597</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojas.2024.142006</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ojas-132125</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Biomedical</subject>
          <subject>Life Sciences</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Effects of Fresh Cupressus sempervirens Leaves Infusion on Growth Performance, Intestinal Microbiota and Haemato-Biochemical Parameters in Broilers</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Mikael</surname>
            <given-names>Donfack</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Bertine</surname>
            <given-names>Noumbissi Marie Noël</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Aimee</surname>
            <given-names>Ciemeni Michelle</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Romario</surname>
            <given-names>Tindo Tsamene</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Bih</surname>
            <given-names>Evelyn Ngwa</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Chamberlin</surname>
            <given-names>Djamen Tchantchou</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Camile</surname>
            <given-names>Nyembo Kondo</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Franklain</surname>
            <given-names>Tsafong Jeatsa</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Boris</surname>
            <given-names>Necdem Tsafack</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Raphaël</surname>
            <given-names>Kana Jean</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> Animal Nutrition and Production Research Unit, Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences, University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon </aff>
      <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label> Department of Animal Sciences and Plant Technology, Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, La Sapientia Catholic University of Goma, Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>08</day>
        <month>03</month>
        <year>2024</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>03</month>
        <year>2024</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>02</issue>
      <fpage>70</fpage>
      <lpage>87</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>01</day>
          <month>02</month>
          <year>2024</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>25</day>
          <month>03</month>
          <year>2024</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>28</day>
          <month>03</month>
          <year>2024</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2024 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2024.142006">https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2024.142006</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>The accumulation of growth-promoting antibiotic residues in animal products and the resistance developed by bacteria in poultry farms has led to a search for natural compounds derived from plants. This study was designed to promote the production performance of broiler chickens using fresh <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> leaves infusion. Fresh <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> leaves were harvested, washed, chopped and ground to a paste using a blender and fermented for three days in a closed container at a rate of 500 g/L of water. The solution obtained was filtered and added at the rate of 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 ml/L of drinking water. The chickens fed on the graded level of the solution were compared to a control ration without an additive and positive control group supplemented with 1 g antibiotic/kg feed. At the finisher phase and throughout the study period, water intake increased significantly (P &lt; 0.05) with increasing levels of infusion. Feed intake decreased significantly (P &lt; 0.05) with 2 and 4 ml of infusion/L drinking water. Live weight and weight gain were significantly (P &lt; 0.05) higher with 6 ml/L, while feed conversion significantly (P &lt; 0.05) decreased with the same treatment compared with the control treatment without additives (T0). Carcass characteristics were not significantly (P &gt; 0.05) affected by the inclusion of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> infusion. Haematological parameters significantly (P &lt; 0.05) increase independently of the rate of incorporation of the infusion into the drinking water, with the exception of RBCs, MCHT and PCT. Serum content in total protein, globulins, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides were significantly (P &lt; 0.05) high with 8 and 10 ml <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> infusion<italic>/</italic>litre drinking water as compared to all other treatments. AST, ALT, urea, creatine, albumin, total cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol were not significantly affected. The lactic acid bacteria load increased significantly (P &lt; 0.05) above 4 ml of infusion while <italic>E.</italic><italic>coli</italic> and <italic>salmonella</italic> counts decreased significantly (P &lt; 0.05) with infusion compared to the control without additive. In conclusion, 6 ml of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> infusion can be used as an alternative to antibiotic feed additives to promote growth performance in broilers<italic>.</italic></p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Broilers</kwd>
        <kwd>&lt;i&gt;Cupressus&lt;/i&gt; &lt;i&gt;sempervirens&lt;/i&gt;</kwd>
        <kwd>Growth Performance</kwd>
        <kwd>Haemato-Biochemical Parameters</kwd>
        <kwd>Intestinal Microbiota</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>The livestock industry, and particularly the poultry industry, has been faced with a drop in productivity due to the ban on antibiotics as growth promoters in animal nutrition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]. The use of antibiotics as growth promoters has led not only to the development of resistance in pathogenic microbes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>], but also to health problems linked to the antibiotic residues in livestock products intended for human consumption [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]. This ban has led to a search for natural biodegradable compounds, derived from plants called phytobiotics that can produce the same effects as antibiotics with less or no impact on animal and human health and the environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>]. Studies revealed the presence in phytobiotics of active compounds such as isoprenes, flavonoids, tannins and alkaloids that act on animal growth through their antimicrobial and antioxidant properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. A large number of studies involving phytobiotics have been carried out as feed additives. These include among others plant and spice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>], essential oils [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>] and neem seed oil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>].</p>
      <p><italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic><italic>is</italic><italic>a</italic> tree that can grow up to 30 m tall, with leaves measuring 0.5 to 1 mm, dark green in colour and obtuse [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]. Native to the Mediterranean basin, it is widespread in central and northern Africa, Asia, southern Europe, North America and southern China [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]. In traditional medicine, the leaves of this tree are generally used to relieve pains such as colds, coughs, bronchitis, haemorrhoids, varicose veins, venous diseases and circulatory disorders [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]. Several studies have reported its antibacterial and antifungal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>], antiviral [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>], antiparasitic and insecticidal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>] antioxidant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>], anti-carcinogenic [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>], hypolipidaemic [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>], osteogenic [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>] and antimicrobial [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>] properties. All these properties are based on the presence of compounds such as alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins, saponins, phenols and several other biologically active compounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>] that can act on animal growth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>]. In view of its properties and secondary metabolites, this plant could provide health and well-being, which could positively affect animal growth performance. The general objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of incorporating an infusion of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> fresh leaves as a feed additive to mitigate the effects of antibiotics growth promoters in animal nutrition.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Material and Methods</title>
      <sec id="sec2dot1">
        <title>2.1. Study Area</title>
        <p>This study was carried out at the Teaching and Research Farm (TRF) of the University of Dschang, located at 05˚26' North latitude, 10˚26' East longitude and at an altitude of 1420 m. The prevailing climate is equatorial, characterized by two seasons. A rainy season lasts from March to November and a dry season covers the rest of the year. Rainfall varies between 1500 and 2000 mm per year. The average temperature is around 21˚C, the average annual insolation is 1837 hours and the average relative humidity is 76.8%.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot2">
        <title>2.2. Experimental Birds</title>
        <p>A total of 336 day-old Cobb 500 chicks were used in this study for a period of 49 days. They were randomly assigned following a completely randomized design to 7 treatments replicated 3 times with 16 chicks each (8 males and 8 females). Water and feed were provided <italic>ad</italic><italic>libitum</italic> to the birds. An anti-stress was given in drinking water during the first 3 days after the chicks’ arrival. The latter was equally given before, during and after each handling and transfer of chicks from the brooder to the finishing house. An anti-coccidian [Vetacox®] and vitamins [AMINTOTAL®] were given through drinking water on 3 consecutive days each week, and from the fourth week onwards only anti-coccidian was given. The birds were vaccinated against infectious bronchitis [H120®] and Newcastle disease [Hitchner B1®] at seven days old and against Gumboro disease [IBA Gumboro®] at tenth day old. The vaccination recall was done on the eighteenth day.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot3">
        <title>2.3. Plant Material and Experimental Rations</title>
        <p>Fresh leaves of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> were collected from a mature tree in full bloom in the city of Dschang, washed with water, chopped and then ground with a blender until they were reduced to a paste and soaked in a closed container of water for three days at a rate of 500 g/1liter. The resulting solution was filtered through Whatman paper (3 MM). The filtrate recovered represents the infusion. The antibiotic (Doxycycline) used in the positive control ration was purchased from a local veterinary pharmacy. Phytochemical analysis of the infusion was carried out by the chromatographic methods described by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>]. It revealed the presence of flavonoids, terpenoids, phenols, alkaloids, tannins, anthocyanins and anthraquinones and the absence of steroids and saponins (<bold>Table 1</bold>). The chicks were litter brooded at a density of 20 chicks/m<sup>2</sup> at the starter phase (1 - 21 days) and 10 chicks/m<sup>2</sup> at the finisher phase (22 - 49 days). A negative control ration (T0) without supplement (<bold>Table 2</bold>), and a positive control ration (R0+) containing </p>
        <p><bold>Table 1.</bold> Phytochemical composition of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> infusion.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl1">
          <label>Table 1</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Phytochemicals</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Result</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Alkaloids</td>
                <td>+</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Flavonoids</td>
                <td>+</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Phenols</td>
                <td>+</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Sterols</td>
                <td>-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Tannins</td>
                <td>+</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Terpenoids</td>
                <td>+</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Saponins</td>
                <td>-</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Anthocyanins</td>
                <td>+</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Anthraquinones</td>
                <td>+</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>Present: +; Absent: -.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 2.</bold> Composition of experimental rations.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl2">
          <label>Table 2</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Ingredients</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Start</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Finish</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Maize</td>
                <td>60</td>
                <td>67</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Remoulding</td>
                <td>2</td>
                <td>2</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Cotton cake</td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>5</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Fish meal</td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>5</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Soya meal</td>
                <td>22</td>
                <td>15</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Oeyster</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>CMAV 5%</td>
                <td>5</td>
                <td>5</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Total</td>
                <td>100</td>
                <td>100</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="3">Analysed chemical composition</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Crude protein (%)</td>
                <td>22.40</td>
                <td>19.44</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Crude cellulose (%MS)</td>
                <td>4.00</td>
                <td>4.35</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="3">Calculated chemical composition</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Metabolizable energy (Kcal/kg)</td>
                <td>2956.10</td>
                <td>3014.13</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Crude protein (% DM/kg)</td>
                <td>23.31</td>
                <td>20.48</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Energy/protein</td>
                <td>126.82</td>
                <td>147.16</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Crude fibre (%)</td>
                <td>5.25</td>
                <td>5.38</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Calcium (%)</td>
                <td>1.17</td>
                <td>1.15</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Phosphorus (%)</td>
                <td>0.48</td>
                <td>0.46</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Calcium/phosphorus</td>
                <td>2.44</td>
                <td>2.50</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Lysine (%)</td>
                <td>1.40</td>
                <td>1.19</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Methionine (%)</td>
                <td>0.48</td>
                <td>0.45</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Lys/meth</td>
                <td>2.92</td>
                <td>2.50</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>CMAV 5% meat: Mineral, nitrogen and vitamin complex: Crude protein = 40%, Lysine = 3.3%, Methionine = 2.40%, Calcium = 8%, Phosphorus = 2.05%, Metabolisable energy = 2078 Kcal/kg.</p>
        <p>1 g antibiotic (Doxycycline)/kg feed were formulated, and the other five treatments consisted of incorporating <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> infusion at a rate of 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 ml/L of drinking water and fed with the control ration (R0).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot4">
        <title>2.4. Growth Performance</title>
        <p>Data were collected every 7 days on feed intake, live body weight, weight gain and feed conversion ratio. Feed was weighed and distributed to the birds daily and at the end of each week, the left overs were collected and weighed. Feed intake was calculated as the difference between the quantity served and the left over in each experimental unit. At the beginning of the trial and every 7 days thereafter, birds in each experimental unit were weighed and weekly weight gain was calculated as the difference between two consecutive weights. Feed conversion ratio (FCR) was calculated as the ratio of the amount of feed intake during the week and the weight gain of the same week. </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot5">
        <title>2.5. Carcass Characteristics</title>
        <p>At 49 days old, 10 chickens per treatment (05 males and 05 females) were fasted for 24 hours, weighed, sacrificed, plucked and eviscerated for carcass evaluation as proceeded by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>]. Carcass yield and relative weights of organs were respectively calculated by dividing the weights of carcass and that of organs by the live body weight of the bird. </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot6">
        <title>2.6. Haematological and Serum Biochemical</title>
        <p>From each slaughtered bird, blood was collected in 2 tests tubes, one containing anticoagulant (EDTA). Blood with anticoagulant was used for haematological analysis using a fully automatic blood cell counter (model PCE-210N Hong kong, China). Haematological parameters studied included White blood cell (WBC), Red blood cell (RBC), Haemoglobin (Hgb), Mean cell haemoglobin concentration (MCHC), Mean cell volume (MCV), Mean cell haemoglobin (MCH) and Packed cell volume (PCV). After centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 20 min of blood free from anticoagulant, serum was collected and preserved at −20˚C for the total protein, albumin, globulin, aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT), alanine aminotransferase (ALAT), total cholesterol, high density lipoproteins (HDL), low density lipoprotein (LDL), triglycerides, urea and creatinine quantification, using the colorimetric method as prescribed by the non-specific chickens commercial kits (Spinreactkits)<sup>®</sup>.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot7">
        <title>2.7. Gut Microbiota</title>
        <p>Before the chickens were sacrificed, faeces samples were aseptically collected using sterile swabs from the cloaca of 4 chickens per treatment and immediately transported to the laboratory for the identification and quantification of lactic acid bacteria, Salmonella and <italic>Escherichia</italic><italic>coli</italic> respectively in the specific culture media as described by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>]. The culture medium used was respectively MRS AGAR, SS AGAR and Mac Conkey AGAR.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot8">
        <title>2.8. Statistical Analysis</title>
        <p>All data collected were submitted to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). In case of a significant difference between treatments groups, Duncan’s multiple range test was used to separate mean at the 5% significance level. The statistical software SPSS 20.0 (Statistical Package for Social Science) was used for the analyses.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>3. Results</title>
      <sec id="sec3dot1">
        <title>3.1. Growth Parameters</title>
        <p><bold>Table 3</bold> summarises the overall growth performance of broilers supplemented with increasing levels of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> infusion through the drinking water. No significant difference (P &gt; 0.05) was recorded between treatments at the starter phase, while at the finisher phase and over the whole trial period, water and feed intake were significantly higher with antibiotic supplemented diet compared to the control ration without additive and the other treatments. There was also a significant linear increase (P &lt; 0.05) in water intake with increasing levels of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> infusion over the whole trial periods.</p>
        <p>At the starter phase, the incorporation of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> filtrate into the drinking water induced no significant difference (P &gt; 0.05) between treatments for live weight and weight gain. However, supplemented birds with 2 ml/L of this phytobiotic tend to decrease live weight and weight gain (P &gt; 0.05). At the finisher phase and over the entire study period, chickens supplemented with the antibiotic and with 6 ml/L of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> filtrate in the drinking water recorded the highest live weight and weight gain (P &lt; 0.05) compared to chickens fed on the control ration without additive and the other rations. From 6 ml/L inclusion of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic>, live weight and weight gain decreased linearly with increasing levels of incorporation.</p>
        <p>At the starter phase, analysis of variance revealed no significant effect (P &gt; 0.05) of infusion on feed conversion ratio while at the finisher phase and over the entire duration of the trial, chickens supplemented with the antibiotic and 6 ml/L of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> infusion recorded the lowest feed conversion ratio (P &lt; 0.05).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot2">
        <title>3.2. Carcass Characteristics</title>
        <p>Carcass characteristics expressed as % live weight of chickens supplemented with increasing levels of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> infusion trough drinking water are presented in <bold>Table 4</bold>. It can be seen that the infusion of fresh <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> leaves had no significant effect (P &gt; 0.05) on carcass characteristics and relative weights of organs compared to carcass characteristics of chickens fed on control rations.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot3">
        <title>3.3. Haematological Parameters</title>
        <p>The summary of the effect of the increasing rate of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> infusion in drinking water on the haematological parameters of broilers is </p>
        <p><bold>Table 3.</bold> Variation of broiler’s growth performance with respect to in-water incorporation level of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> infusion.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl3">
          <label>Table 3</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">
                  <bold>Period</bold>
                  <bold>(</bold>
                  <bold>days</bold>
                  <bold>)</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Control</bold>
                  <bold>rations</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="5">
                  <bold>Incorporation</bold>
                  <bold>levels</bold>
                  <bold>(ml/liter</bold>
                  <bold>of</bold>
                  <bold>drinking</bold>
                  <bold>water)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="2">
                  <bold>P</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>T0</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>T0+</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>2</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>4</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>6</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>8</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>10</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="9">
                  <bold>Water</bold>
                  <bold>intake</bold>
                  <bold>(ml)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>01 to 21</td>
                <td>2634.65±146.86</td>
                <td>2702.50±109.77</td>
                <td>2603.71±189.46</td>
                <td>2591.22±165.59</td>
                <td>2690.79±77.60</td>
                <td>2672.19±175.70</td>
                <td>2672.27±94.19</td>
                <td>0.947</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>22 to 49</td>
                <td>
                  8805.04±109.51
                  <sup>d</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  9823.62±139.38
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  8701.88±187.89
                  <sup>d</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  9024.03±194.04
                  <sup>cd</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  9223.47±289.27
                  <sup>bc</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  9300.66±49.03
                  <sup>bc</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  9443.18±171.31
                  <sup>b</sup>
                </td>
                <td>0.000</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>01 to 49</td>
                <td>
                  1439.69±253.18
                  <sup>cd</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  12526.12±217.10
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  11305.59±155.30
                  <sup>d</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  11615.25±353.31
                  <sup>bcd</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  11914.26±349.57
                  <sup>bc</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  11972.85±183.37
                  <sup>b</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  12115.45±244.54
                  <sup>ab</sup>
                </td>
                <td>0.001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="9">
                  <bold>Feed</bold>
                  <bold>intake</bold>
                  <bold>(g)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>01 to 21</td>
                <td>1033.32±62.19</td>
                <td>1018.56±27.54</td>
                <td>1024.75±15.00</td>
                <td>1007.31±19.95</td>
                <td>1042.74±43.21</td>
                <td>1009.29±15.65</td>
                <td>1023.83±24.26</td>
                <td>0.888</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>22 to 49</td>
                <td>
                  4090.62±87.92
                  <sup>cd</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  4426.47±103.38
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  3927.83±60.53
                  <sup>d</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  4063.46±121.08
                  <sup>cd</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  4379.57±126.79
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  4306.90±98.41
                  <sup>ab</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  4180.33±112.21
                  <sup>bc</sup>
                </td>
                <td>0.000</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>01 to 49</td>
                <td>
                  5123.94±127.61
                  <sup>bcd</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  5445.03±82.41
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  4952.58±68.89
                  <sup>d</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  5070.77±104.03
                  <sup>cd</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  5422.31±162.88
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  5316.19±90.13
                  <sup>ab</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  5204.16±133.67
                  <sup>bc</sup>
                </td>
                <td>0.001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="9">
                  <bold>Live</bold>
                  <bold>body</bold>
                  <bold>weight</bold>
                  <bold>(g)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>01 to 21</td>
                <td>733.31±21.44</td>
                <td>766.58±27.55</td>
                <td>711.88±49.45</td>
                <td>724.92±29.43</td>
                <td>778.45±42.67</td>
                <td>733.56±27.31</td>
                <td>732.15±10.28</td>
                <td>0.230</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>22 to 49</td>
                <td>
                  2429.82±88.94
                  <sup>bc</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  2713.33±50.91
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  2326.85±19.82
                  <sup>c</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  2401.03±66.88
                  <sup>bc</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  2625.39±86.35
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  2489.89±70.38
                  <sup>b</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  2447.25±95.00
                  <sup>bc</sup>
                </td>
                <td>0.000</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="9">
                  <bold>Weight</bold>
                  <bold>gain</bold>
                  <bold>(g)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>01 to 21</td>
                <td>689.13±21.44</td>
                <td>722.40±27.55</td>
                <td>667.70±49.45</td>
                <td>680.74±29.43</td>
                <td>734.27±42.67</td>
                <td>689.38±27.31</td>
                <td>687.97±10.28</td>
                <td>0.230</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>22 to 49</td>
                <td>
                  1696.51±81.56
                  <sup>cd</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  1946.75±47.93
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  1614.98±61.41
                  <sup>d</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  1676.11±39.96
                  <sup>cd</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  1846.94±91.15
                  <sup>ab</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  1756.33±43.92
                  <sup>bc</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  1715.11±95.68
                  <sup>cd</sup>
                </td>
                <td>0.001</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>01 to 49</td>
                <td>
                  2385.64±88.94
                  <sup>bc</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  2669.15±50.91
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  2282.68±19.82
                  <sup>c</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  2356.85±66.88
                  <sup>bc</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  2581.21±86.35
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  2445.71±70.38
                  <sup>b</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  2403.08±95.00
                  <sup>bc</sup>
                </td>
                <td>0.000</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>Continued</bold></p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl4">
          <label>Table 4</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td colspan="9">
                  <bold>Feed</bold>
                  <bold>conversion</bold>
                  <bold>ratio</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>01 to 21</td>
                <td>1.50±0.11</td>
                <td>1.41±0.03</td>
                <td>1.54±0.12</td>
                <td>1.48±0.08</td>
                <td>1.42±0.02</td>
                <td>1.47±0.08</td>
                <td>1.49±0.5</td>
                <td>0.527</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>22 to 49</td>
                <td>
                  2.41±0.08
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  2.27±0.01
                  <sup>b</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  2.43±0.05
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  2.42±0.02
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  2.37±0.12
                  <sup>ab</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  2.45±0.04
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  2.44±0.10
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>0.019</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>01 to 49</td>
                <td>
                  2.15±0.03
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  2.04±0.02
                  <sup>b</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  2.17±0.02
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  2.15±0.02
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  2.10±0.07
                  <sup>ab</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  2.17±0.05
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  2.17±0.06
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>0.020</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><sup>a,b,c,d</sup>means bearing the same letter on the same line are not significantly different (P &gt; 0.05). <bold>T0:</bold> control ration with no additives; <bold>T0+</bold>: ration with no additive control + 1 g/L doxycycline; <bold>P</bold>: P-value.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 4.</bold> Variation in relative organ weight and carcass yield as a function of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> infusion rate.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl5">
          <label>Table 5</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">
                  <bold>Characteristics</bold>
                  <bold>(%LBW)</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Control</bold>
                  <bold>rations</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="5">
                  <bold>Incorporation</bold>
                  <bold>levels</bold>
                  <bold>(ml/liter</bold>
                  <bold>of</bold>
                  <bold>drinking</bold>
                  <bold>water)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="2">
                  <bold>P</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>T0</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>T0+</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>2</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>4</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>6</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>8</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>10</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Carcass</bold>
                  <bold>yield</bold>
                  <bold>(%)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>74.31±0.96</td>
                <td>74.91±1.38</td>
                <td>73.47±2.70</td>
                <td>74.84±1.78</td>
                <td>75.08±1.09</td>
                <td>74.78±0.80</td>
                <td>74.53±1.89</td>
                <td>0.370</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Head</bold>
                </td>
                <td>2.18±0.17</td>
                <td>2.08±0.19</td>
                <td>2.19±0.25</td>
                <td>2.11±0.19</td>
                <td>2.17±0.34</td>
                <td>2.15±0.26</td>
                <td>2.11±0.17</td>
                <td>0.875</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Legs</bold>
                </td>
                <td>3.69±0.44</td>
                <td>3.70±0.48</td>
                <td>3.82±0.51</td>
                <td>3.72±0.43</td>
                <td>3.58±0.38</td>
                <td>3.63±0.30</td>
                <td>3.55±0.60</td>
                <td>0.934</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Liver</bold>
                </td>
                <td>1.61±0.19</td>
                <td>1.63±0.15</td>
                <td>1.63±0.14</td>
                <td>1.73±0.19</td>
                <td>1.61±0.10</td>
                <td>1.66±0.15</td>
                <td>1.71±0.21</td>
                <td>0.602</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Heart</bold>
                </td>
                <td>0.51±0.07</td>
                <td>0.46±0.11</td>
                <td>0.48±0.08</td>
                <td>0.50±0.05</td>
                <td>0.47±0.07</td>
                <td>0.45±0.09</td>
                <td>0.52±0.11</td>
                <td>0.561</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Pancreas</bold>
                </td>
                <td>0.23±0.04</td>
                <td>0.21±0.06</td>
                <td>0.20±0.08</td>
                <td>0.23±0.06</td>
                <td>0.23±0.04</td>
                <td>0.19±0.05</td>
                <td>0.23±0.06</td>
                <td>0.579</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Abdominal</bold>
                  <bold>fat</bold>
                </td>
                <td>1.80±0.39</td>
                <td>1.78±0.54</td>
                <td>1.76±0.64</td>
                <td>1.31±0.59</td>
                <td>1.67±0.47</td>
                <td>1.52±0.41</td>
                <td>1.81±0.12</td>
                <td>0.213</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><bold>T0:</bold> control ration with no additives; <bold>T0+</bold>: ration with no additive control + 1 g/L doxycycline, BW: Body Weight; <bold>P</bold>: P-value.</p>
        <p>presented in <bold>Table 5</bold>. The analysis of variance shows that Haematological parameters were significantly (P &lt; 0.05) increase independently of the rate of incorporation of the infusion, with the exception of red blood cells, mean corpuscular haemoglobin content and platelets. Chickens fed with 6 ml of infusion per litre of drinking water had a significantly (P &lt; 0.05) lower white blood cell count compared to chickens in the control group. Furthermore, chickens fed with 4 and 10 ml of infusion per litre of drinking water respectively recorded significantly (P &lt; 0.05) higher mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC) and a blood platelet concentration.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 5.</bold> Effects of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> infusion rate on haematological parameters in broilers.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl6">
          <label>Table 6</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="2">
                  <bold>Paramètres</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Control</bold>
                  <bold>rations</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="5">
                  <bold>Incorporation</bold>
                  <bold>levels</bold>
                  <bold>(ml/liter</bold>
                  <bold>of</bold>
                  <bold>drinking</bold>
                  <bold>water)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="2">
                  <bold>P</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>T0</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>T0+</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>2</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>4</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>6</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>8</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>10</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>WBC</bold>
                  <bold>(10</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>9</sup>
                  </bold>
                  <bold>/L)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  314.29±32.24
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  259.60±9.34
                  <sup>b</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  213.85±33.35
                  <sup>c</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  247.73±32.14
                  <sup>b</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  207.93±11.24
                  <sup>c</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  210.57±34.14
                  <sup>c</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  210.03±24.54
                  <sup>bc</sup>
                </td>
                <td>0.000</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>RBC</bold>
                  <bold>(10</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>12</sup>
                  </bold>
                  <bold>/L)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>4.19±0.94</td>
                <td>5.13±0.24</td>
                <td>5.07±1.28</td>
                <td>5.91±0.27</td>
                <td>5.84±0.16</td>
                <td>4.32±1.65</td>
                <td>4.17±1.53</td>
                <td>0.215</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>HGB</bold>
                  <bold>(g/dL)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  23.18±2.27
                  <sup>c</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  24.45±0.92
                  <sup>bc</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  26.26±2.53
                  <sup>abc</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  29.13±0.64
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  28.53±0.78
                  <sup>ab</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  22.77±5.34
                  <sup>bc</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  25.38±3.65
                  <sup>ab</sup>
                </td>
                <td>0.021</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>HCT</bold>
                  <bold>(%)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  71.90±1.20
                  <sup>d</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  73.70±1.80
                  <sup>cd</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  75.39±2.82
                  <sup>c</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  84.38±1.10
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  81.63±1.71
                  <sup>b</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  75.20±3.14
                  <sup>c</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  82.17±3.18
                  <sup>ab</sup>
                </td>
                <td>0.000</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>M</bold>
                  <bold>C</bold>
                  <bold>V</bold>
                  <bold>(%</bold>
                  <bold>)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  144.18±2.93
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  145.00±2.39
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  137.75±3.82
                  <sup>b</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  138.67±1.50
                  <sup>b</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  139.87±0.95
                  <sup>ab</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  144.10±2.30
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  143.83±2.12
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>0.004</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>MCH</bold>
                  <bold>(pg)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>49.30±3.17</td>
                <td>47.65±0.76</td>
                <td>49.68±3.73</td>
                <td>49.27±1.29</td>
                <td>48.83±0.25</td>
                <td>48.33±2.02</td>
                <td>49.20±1.66</td>
                <td>0.275</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>MCCH</bold>
                  <bold>(g/dL)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  33.30±1.09
                  <sup>c</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  33.13±0.46
                  <sup>c</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  34.98±0.43
                  <sup>ab</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  35.53±1.25
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  34.90±0.35
                  <sup>ab</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  33.93±0.98
                  <sup>bc</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  34.20±1.08
                  <sup>ab</sup>
                </td>
                <td>0.000</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>PLT</bold>
                  <bold>(10</bold>
                  <bold>
                    <sup>9</sup>
                  </bold>
                  <bold>/L)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  72.00±5.76
                  <sup>b</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  42.25±7.91
                  <sup>d</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  59.25±4.79
                  <sup>c</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  70.67±2.52
                  <sup>b</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  70.00±7.00
                  <sup>bc</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  67.67±5.86
                  <sup>bc</sup>
                </td>
                <td>
                  113.67±7.37
                  <sup>a</sup>
                </td>
                <td>0.000</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>PCT</bold>
                  <bold>(%)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>0.03±0.01</td>
                <td>0.05±0.04</td>
                <td>0.04±0.02</td>
                <td>0.10±0.08</td>
                <td>0.06±0.03</td>
                <td>0.27±0.38</td>
                <td>0.06±0.03</td>
                <td>0.412</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p><sup>a,b,c,d</sup>means bearing the same letter on the same line are not significantly different (P &gt; 0.05). <bold>T0:</bold> control ration with no additives; <bold>T0+</bold>: ration with no additive control + 1 g/L doxycycline; P = Probability; WBC = White Blood Cells; RBC = Red Blood Cells; Hgb = Haemoglobin; HCT = Haematocrit; MCV = Mean Corpuscular Volume; MCH = Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin; MCC = Mean Corpuscular haemoglobin Concentration; PCV = Packed Cell Volume; <bold>P</bold>: P-value.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot4">
        <title>3.4. Biochemical Parameters</title>
        <p><bold>Table 6</bold> presents the effects of increasing levels of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> infusion on the biochemical parameters of broilers. Markers of hepatic functions (ALAT and ASAT) and kedneys functions (urea and creatinine) were not significantly (P &gt; 0.05) affected by <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> infusion whatever the rate in drinking water. Feeding broilers with <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> infusion significantly (P &lt; 0.05) increased total protein and globulin content in a linear manner with increasing rate of the infusion.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot5">
        <title>3.5. Intestinal Microbiota</title>
        <p>The results of the bacterial colonies on the intestinal microbiota are summarised in <bold>Table 7</bold>. Broilers fed on the ration without the supplement had a significantly (P &lt; 0.05) lower lactic acid bacterial load compared to all other treatments groups. The increasing rates of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> infusion into the drinking water resulted in a significant (P &lt; 0.05) reduction of <italic>Escherichia</italic><italic>coli</italic> count compared to the control ration without additive. </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>4. Discussion</title>
      <p>The inclusion of large quantities of feed additives is likely to considerably reduce the feed intake in animals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>]. In this study, the reduction in feed intake in broilers fed on rations supplemented with 8 and 10 ml <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic><italic>filtrate/L</italic><italic>drinking</italic> water could be related to the bitterness of the water induced by the presence of alkaloids in the high levels of the infusion. This result is in line with previous research by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>] who reported a significant drop in feed intake with the incorporation of 5 g of <italic>Pentadiplandra</italic><italic>brazzeana</italic> powder/L of drinking water. These authors explain these results by the presence of alkaloids in the spice, which progressively induced a bitter taste in the drinking water that was not appreciated by the chickens, causing a drop in water intake and consequently in feed intake. It was also noted in this study that the feed intake of chickens fed on 6 ml/L of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> infusion was comparable to that of the chickens given the antibiotic, which was significantly higher than that of the control group. This result contradicts the finding of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>] who repported a significant increase in feed intake with the increasing levels of methenamine in drinking water of broilers. </p>
      <p>Live weight and weight gain at the finisher phase and over the entire study period of broilers supplemented with antibiotic and 6 ml of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> filtrate were significantly high as compared to all other treatments groups. These results are in line with the findings of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>] who reported that 50 ml of ginger extract per litre of drinking water significantly improved the final live weight and weekly weight gain of broilers; and the results of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>] who reported a significantly positive effect on the weight gain of rats fed with <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> extaits. This beneficial effect of live weight and weight gain with this phytobiotic in drinking water was explained by the presence of phenolic, terpenoic, and alkaloid compounds that are also present in <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic>. </p>
      <p><bold>Table</bold><bold>6</bold><bold>.</bold> Effects of increasing rate of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> infusion in water on biochemical parameters of broilers.</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl7">
        <label>Table 7</label>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="2">
                <bold>Parameters</bold>
              </td>
              <td colspan="2">
                <bold>Control</bold>
                <bold>rations</bold>
              </td>
              <td colspan="5">
                <bold>Incorporation</bold>
                <bold>levels</bold>
                <bold>(ml/liter</bold>
                <bold>of</bold>
                <bold>drinking</bold>
                <bold>water)</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="2">
                <bold>P</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>T0</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>T0+</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>2</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>4</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>6</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>8</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>10</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>ALAT</bold>
                <bold>(U/I)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>9.38±24.22</td>
              <td>123.80±66.88</td>
              <td>79.92±56.81</td>
              <td>124.69±48.17</td>
              <td>80.35±51.40</td>
              <td>99.60±66.12</td>
              <td>147.66±68.12</td>
              <td>0.515</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>ASAT</bold>
                <bold>(U/I)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>139.71±56.98</td>
              <td>93.00±57.74</td>
              <td>103.83±47.20</td>
              <td>99.31±73.98</td>
              <td>112.88±20.11</td>
              <td>137.81±39.13</td>
              <td>90.23±51.78</td>
              <td>0.439</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Urea</bold>
                <bold>(mg/dl)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>10.89±8.23</td>
              <td>13.14±8.70</td>
              <td>22.67±14.21</td>
              <td>19.25±6.23</td>
              <td>10.61±7.77</td>
              <td>27.00±23.03</td>
              <td>18.42±7.65</td>
              <td>0.258</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Creatinine</bold>
                <bold>(mg/dl)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>0.43±0.13</td>
              <td>0.63±0.44</td>
              <td>0.89±0.92</td>
              <td>0.59±0.33</td>
              <td>0.41±0.23</td>
              <td>0.59±0.37</td>
              <td>0.51±0.20</td>
              <td>0.281</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Total</bold>
                <bold>protein</bold>
                <bold>(mg/dl)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                2.65±1.16
                <sup>d</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                6.05±1.45
                <sup>ab</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                3.24±2.12
                <sup>cd</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                4.56±2.23
                <sup>c</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                5.01±1.59
                <sup>bc</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                7.37±1.69
                <sup>a</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                7.58±1.41
                <sup>a</sup>
              </td>
              <td>0.000</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Albumin</bold>
                <bold>(mg/dl)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>3.03±1.21</td>
              <td>3.11±0.71</td>
              <td>2.84±0.63</td>
              <td>3.06±1.06</td>
              <td>2.50±0.73</td>
              <td>3.49±1.04</td>
              <td>3.61±1.46</td>
              <td>0.182</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Globulin</bold>
                <bold>(mg/dl)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                0.73±0.63
                <sup>c</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                2.94±1.91
                <sup>ab</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                1.91±0.78
                <sup>bc</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                2.44±0.61
                <sup>bc</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                2.52±1.11
                <sup>bc</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                3.88±1,35
                <sup>.</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                3.97±1.42
                <sup>a</sup>
              </td>
              <td>0.000</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Albumin/</bold>
                <bold>globulin</bold>
                <bold>(mg/dl)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>2.60±0.98</td>
              <td>1.09±0.47</td>
              <td>1.62±0.52</td>
              <td>1.34±0.62</td>
              <td>1.37±1.07</td>
              <td>1.04±0.66</td>
              <td>1.12±0.90</td>
              <td>0.696</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Total</bold>
                <bold>cholesterol</bold>
                <bold>(mg/dl)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>106.56±42.36</td>
              <td>141.37±24.15</td>
              <td>132.39±82.53</td>
              <td>135.43±36.66</td>
              <td>124.92±35.21</td>
              <td>172.87±49.04</td>
              <td>138.66±60.30</td>
              <td>0.093</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>HDL</bold>
                <bold>cholesterol</bold>
                <bold>(mg/dl)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>35.76±7.30</td>
              <td>33.01±10.95</td>
              <td>29.02±15.64</td>
              <td>37.88±8.88</td>
              <td>32.47±7.13</td>
              <td>28.94±4.69</td>
              <td>31.65±9.76</td>
              <td>0.474</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>LDL</bold>
                <bold>cholesterol</bold>
                <bold>(mg/dl)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                60.35±36.35
                <sup>b</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                86.73±24.92
                <sup>ab</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                68.68±80.15
                <sup>ab</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                80.54±41.32
                <sup>ab</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                69.89±36.81
                <sup>ab</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                111.11±53.40
                <sup>a</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                84.50±62.57
                <sup>ab</sup>
              </td>
              <td>0.019</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Triglyceride</bold>
                <bold>(mg/dl)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                52.20±7.18
                <sup>c</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                108.15±50.11
                <sup>ab</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                106.17±29.33
                <sup>ab</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                85.02±16.20
                <sup>bc</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                112.81±31.59
                <sup>ab</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                126.57±33.79
                <sup>a</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                112.56±37.72
                <sup>ab</sup>
              </td>
              <td>0.003</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p><sup>a,b,c,d</sup>means bearing the same letter on the same line are not significantly different (P &gt; 0.05). <bold>T0:</bold> control ration with no additives; <bold>T0+</bold>: ration with no additive control + 1 g/L doxycycline; <bold>P</bold>: P-value.</p>
      <p><bold>Table 7.</bold> Variation of broilers intestinal microbial count as affected by the infusion of fresh leaves of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> rate in drinking water.</p>
      <table-wrap id="tbl8">
        <label>Table 8</label>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td rowspan="2">
                <bold>Bacterial</bold>
                <bold>load</bold>
                <bold>log10</bold>
                <bold>(CFU)</bold>
              </td>
              <td colspan="2">
                <bold>Control</bold>
                <bold>rations</bold>
              </td>
              <td colspan="5">
                <bold>Incorporation</bold>
                <bold>levels</bold>
                <bold>(ml/liter</bold>
                <bold>of</bold>
                <bold>drinking</bold>
                <bold>water)</bold>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="2">
                <bold>P</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>T0</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>T0+</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>2</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>4</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>6</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>8</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>10</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Lactic</bold>
                <bold>acid</bold>
                <bold>bacteria</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                6.80±0.16
                <sup>c</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                8.78±0.08
                <sup>a</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                7.72±0.16
                <sup>b</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                8.78±0.30
                <sup>a</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                8.94±0.12
                <sup>a</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                8.77±0.16
                <sup>a</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                9.02±0.17
                <sup>a</sup>
              </td>
              <td>0.000</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <italic>
                  <bold>Escherichia</bold>
                </italic>
                <italic>
                  <bold>coli</bold>
                </italic>
              </td>
              <td>
                8.02±0.10
                <sup>a</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                7.02±0.35
                <sup>bc</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                7.37±0.07
                <sup>b</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                7.12±0.07
                <sup>bc</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                7.40±0.04
                <sup>b</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                6.99±0.36
                <sup>bc</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                6.86±0.24
                <sup>c</sup>
              </td>
              <td>0.000</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Salmonella</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                8.91±0.18
                <sup>ab</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                8.59±0.06
                <sup>cd</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                8.84±0.03
                <sup>abc</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                8.68±0.02
                <sup>bc</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                8.90±0.26
                <sup>ab</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                8.97±0.03
                <sup>a</sup>
              </td>
              <td>
                8.35±0.18
                <sup>d</sup>
              </td>
              <td>0.001</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p><sup>a,b,c,d</sup>means bearing the same letter on the same line are not significantly different (P &gt; 0.05). <bold>T0:</bold> control ration with no additives; <bold>T0+</bold>: ration with no additive control + 1 g/L doxycycline; <bold>P</bold>: P-value.</p>
      <p>These active compounds can reduce host microbial competition for nutrients by reducing pathogenic bacteria. The improvement in live weight and weight gain in broilers fed on antibiotic supplemented feed could be explained by its ability to modulate the microbiota by reducing pathogenic bacteria (<italic>Escherichia</italic><italic>coli</italic> and Salmonella).</p>
      <p>The feed conversion ratio (FCR) at the finisher phase and over the entire trial period was significantly higher than that of chickens supplemented with antibiotics. This result is in agreement with the work of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>] who reported that the feed conversion ratio of broilers on the additive-free ration was significantly higher than that of the positive control batch, but remained comparable to rations fed methenamine in the drinking water. These results contradict those of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>] who reported a decrease in feed conversion in broilers and quail with the inclusion of 0.2%, 0.4%, and 0.6% of <italic>Dichostachys</italic><italic>glomerata</italic> powder in the feed. </p>
      <p>Increasing rates of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> infusion in broiler drinking water, had no significant effect on carcass characteristics and relative weights of organs. This result is in agreement with the results of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>], who recorded no significant effect on carcass yield, gut weight, the relative weight of liver, gizzard, the pancreas of broilers fed Livol (1 ml/2litre water), Livotal (1 ml/4litre water) and hepato promotor (1 ml/4litre water) which are commercial phytobiotics. Similarly, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>] reported that the increasing levels of methenamine in the drinking water of broilers had no significant effect on carcass yield and relative organ weights compared with chickens from control batches. In the same line, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>] found that the inclusion of increasing rates of <italic>Pentadiplandra</italic><italic>brazzeana</italic> powder in the drinking water of broilers significantly affected carcass yield, but not digestive organs. Increasing levels of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> filtrate in the drinking water had no significant effect on abdominal fat. This result corroborates those of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>] who reported that supplementing Japanese quails with gradual levels of <italic>Dichostachys</italic><italic>glomerata</italic> fruit powder indicated no significant effect on relative abdominal fat weight. In contrast, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>] reported that the incorporation of 1.5 g/kg of <italic>Capsicum</italic><italic>annum</italic><italic>into</italic><italic>the</italic><italic>broiler</italic> ration resulted in a 43.4% reduction in abdominal fat compared with the control ration. </p>
      <p>Blood parameters reflect the health status of an organism and any changes in these could indicate a dietary imbalance or microbial attack [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>] and animals with good blood composition are likely to perform well [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>]. In the present study, red blood cell count, mean corpuscular haemoglobin content and platelet counts were not significantly affected by the phytobiotic. The white blood cells of the broilers in the control group without the additive were significantly higher than those of broilers supplemented with antibiotic, while the Hgb, VGM, CCMH and PLT of the chickens in the control ration were significantly lower with <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> infusion. This is different from the finding of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>] which revealed an increase in red blood cell count in broilers receiving ginger extracts, and that of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>] which showed no significant effect on white blood cell count when 0.25% garlic, ginger and the garlic-ginger mixture were incorporated into the broiler feed. The present result corroborates that of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>] who stated that in broilers the haemoglobin level increased with aqueous garlic extracts (20 ml/L) in the drinking water. The present result is different from the findings of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>] who recorded no significant effects on haemoglobin levels in chickens fed different rates of garlic.</p>
      <p>Supplementing broilers with increasing levels of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> had no significant effect on ASAT and ALAT concentrations. This result suggests that the active principles present in this plant have no harmful effect on the liver. This result corroborates the work of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>] who reported that ginger and garlic essential oils administered by gavage at doses of 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg/day had no effect on serum transaminase activity (ALAT and ASAT). This observation contradicts the results of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>] who reported that the addition of 5% ginger, garlic and cinnamon to the turkey ration reduced the concentration of ALAT and ASAT. Serum urea is an index that reflects the status of protein metabolism, renal function and body nutrition. Serum urea and creatinine concentrations were not significantly affected by increasing levels of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> in drinking water. This result is in agreement with that of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>] who reported that the addition of 0.25% ginger, garlic and the ginger-garlic mixture to the broiler ration did not significantly affect creatinine and urea concentrations. Feeding chickens with increasing levels of infusion of this plant through the drinking water did not significantly affect the serum cholesterol profile. This result contradicts the work of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>] who reported that the addition of thyme to the broilers’ ration induced a significant drop in serum levels of HDL, total cholesterol and total lipids. </p>
      <p>The increasing levels of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> in the broiler drinking water induced a significant increase in the Lactobacilli count compared to the negative control ration. The number of <italic>Escherichia</italic><italic>coli</italic> decreased significantly with the increasing levels of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> filtrate in drinking water compared to the negative control ration, while the Salmonella load of the control ration was comparable with the other treatments. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>] reported that when conditions in the intestinal environment become favourable, lactic acid bacteria multiply and selectively eliminate pathogenic bacteria (Salmonella and <italic>Escherichia</italic><italic>coli</italic>) due to their acidifying properties and their ability to produce antibacterial substances such as organic acids. The hydrophobic compounds present in plants that penetrate the bacterial cell membrane disintegrate the membrane structure and cause leaks, making the microbes less virulent. Contrary to the present result, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>] reported a significant increase in the number of Salmonella, unlike the number of <italic>Escherichia</italic><italic>coli</italic>, which was not affected by the supplementation of silver nanoparticles in the drinking water of broilers. Birds supplemented with 10 ml of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> recorded the lowest Salmonella and <italic>Escherichia</italic><italic>coli</italic> loads. This suggests that, at this dose, the concentration of active compounds present in this phytobiotic has a positive effect on the inhibition of pathogenic bacteria. </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5">
      <title>5. Conclusion</title>
      <p>Incorporating 6 ml of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> infusion per litre of drinking water can be used as a substitute for antibiotics to modulate the intestinal microbiota and improve nutrient absorption, with a positive impact on the growth performance of broiler chickens, without any toxic effect on vital organs such as the liver and kidneys.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hashemi, S.R. and Davoodi, H. (2010) Phytogenics as New Class of Feed Additives in Poultry Industry. <italic>Journal of Animal Veterinary Advance</italic>, 9, 2295-2304. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20103320836 https://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2010.2295.2304 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3923/javaa.2010.2295.2304</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2010.2295.2304">https://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2010.2295.2304</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Hashemi, S.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Davoodi, H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2010</year>
            <article-title>Phytogenics as New Class of Feed Additives in Poultry Industry</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Animal Veterinary Advance</source>
            <volume>9</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3923/javaa.2010.2295.2304</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kana, J.R., Defang, F.H., Teguia, A., Takoumbo, T.B., Kana, Y. and Mongo, B. (2012) Growth Activating Effect of <italic>Canarium</italic><italic>schweinfurthii</italic> Engl Stone Charcoal as Antibiotic Replacement in Broiler Feed <italic>.</italic></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kana, J.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Defang, F.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Teguia, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Takoumbo, T.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kana, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mongo, B.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>Growth Activating Effect of Canarium schweinfurthii Engl Stone Charcoal as Antibiotic Replacement in Broiler Feed</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">Chardon, H. and Brugere, H. (2014) Usages des Antibiotiques en ELevage et Filieres Viandes [Antibiotic Use in Livestock and Meat Industries]. Cahiers Securite Sanitaire Sante Animale. Centre D’Information des Viande, 1-34. http://www.gds03.fr/pages/civ.pdf</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Chardon, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Brugere, H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Usages des Antibiotiques en ELevage et Filieres Viandes [Antibiotic Use in Livestock and Meat Industries]</article-title>
            <source>Cahiers Securite Sanitaire Sante Animale. Centre D’Information des Viande</source>
            <volume>1</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mafouo, S.V., Kana, J.R. and Nguepi, D.K. (2019) Preservative Effects of Neem Oil ( <italic>A</italic><italic>zadirachta indica</italic>) on Farm-Mixed Poultry Feed. <italic>International</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Livesto</italic><italic>ck</italic><italic>Research</italic>, 9, 49-61.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Mafouo, S.V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kana, J.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nguepi, D.K.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <article-title>Preservative Effects of Neem Oil (Azadirachta indica) on Farm-Mixed Poultry Feed</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Livestock Research</source>
            <volume>9</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Fankam, A.G., Kuete, V., Voukeng, I.K., Kuiate, J.R. and Pages, J.M. (2011) Antibacterial Activities of Selected Cameroonian Spices and Their Synergistic Effects with Antibiotics against Multidrug-Resistant Phenotypes. <italic>BMC Complementa</italic><italic>ry and Alternative Medicine</italic>, 11, Article No. 140. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-11-104 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1472-6882-11-104</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22044718</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-11-104">https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-11-104</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Fankam, A.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kuete, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Voukeng, I.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kuiate, J.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pages, J.M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2011</year>
            <article-title>Antibacterial Activities of Selected Cameroonian Spices and Their Synergistic Effects with Antibiotics against Multidrug-Resistant Phenotypes</article-title>
            <source>BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine</source>
            <volume>11</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1472-6882-11-104</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22044718</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Toghyani, M., Tohidi, M., Gheisari, A., Ghalamkari, G. and Eghbalsaied, S. (2011) Evaluation of Cinnamon and Garlic as Antibiotic Growth Promoter Substitutions on Performance, Immune Responses, Serum Biochemical and Haematological Parameters in Broiler Chicks. <italic>Journal of Livestock Science</italic>, 138, 167-173. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/s1871141310006335 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.12.018 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.livsci.2010.12.018</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.12.018">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.12.018</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Toghyani, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tohidi, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gheisari, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ghalamkari, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Eghbalsaied, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Performance, I</string-name>
              <string-name>Responses, S</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2011</year>
            <article-title>Evaluation of Cinnamon and Garlic as Antibiotic Growth Promoter Substitutions on Performance, Immune Responses, Serum Biochemical and Haematological Parameters in Broiler Chicks</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Livestock Science</source>
            <volume>138</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.livsci.2010.12.018</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kana, J.R., Mube, K.H., Ngouana, T.R., Tsafong, F., Komguep, R., Yangoue, A. and Teguia, A. (2017) Effect of Dietary Mimosa Small Bell ( <italic>Dichostachys</italic><italic>glomerata</italic>) Fruit Supplement as Alternative to Antibiotic Growth Promoter for Broiler Chicken. <italic>Journal</italic><italic>World</italic><italic>Poultry</italic>, 7, 27-34. https://jwpr.scienceline.com/attachments/article/40/j%20world%20poult%20res%207</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kana, J.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mube, K.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ngouana, T.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tsafong, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Komguep, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yangoue, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Teguia, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2017</year>
            <article-title>Effect of Dietary Mimosa Small Bell (Dichostachys glomerata) Fruit Supplement as Alternative to Antibiotic Growth Promoter for Broiler Chicken</article-title>
            <source>Journal World Poultry</source>
            <volume>7</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Necdem, T.B., Raphaël, K.J., Divine, Y.M., Agwah, E.D., Ruben, N.T., Mikael, D., Gilchrist, T.D., Josiane, K.N. and Alexis, T. (2020) Effects of Graded Levels of Joy Perfume Tree ( <italic>Pentadiplandra brazzeana</italic>) Powder in Drinking Water on Growth Performance, Gut Microbiota and Haemato-Biochemical Parameters of Broiler Chickens. <italic>Open Journal of Animal Sciences</italic>, 10, 514-527. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2020.103032 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojas.2020.103032</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2020.103032">https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2020.103032</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Necdem, T.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Divine, Y.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Agwah, E.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ruben, N.T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mikael, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gilchrist, T.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Josiane, K.N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Alexis, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Performance, G</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Effects of Graded Levels of Joy Perfume Tree (Pentadiplandra brazzeana) Powder in Drinking Water on Growth Performance, Gut Microbiota and Haemato-Biochemical Parameters of Broiler Chickens</article-title>
            <source>Open Journal of Animal Sciences</source>
            <volume>10</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojas.2020.103032</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Khattak, F., Ronchi, A., Castelli, P. and Sparks, N. (2014) Effects of Natural Blend of Essential Oil on Growth Performance, Blood Biochemistry, Cecal Morphology, and Carcass Quality of Broiler Chickens. <italic>Poultry Science</italic>, 93, 132-137. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/s0032579119359917 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03387 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps.2013-03387</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24570432</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03387">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03387</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Khattak, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ronchi, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Castelli, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sparks, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Performance, B</string-name>
              <string-name>Biochemistry, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Effects of Natural Blend of Essential Oil on Growth Performance, Blood Biochemistry, Cecal Morphology, and Carcass Quality of Broiler Chickens</article-title>
            <source>Poultry Science</source>
            <volume>93</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps.2013-03387</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24570432</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ngouana, T.R., Kana, J.R., Tsafack, N.B., Yemdjie, M.D.D., Mube, K.H., Kuiede, S., Teguia, A. and Meimandipour, A. (2017) Performances of Broiler Chickens Fed on Diet Supplemented with Thyme and Oregano Essential Oils Stabilized in a Plant Charcoal Matrix. <italic>Journal of World</italic>’ <italic>s Poultry Research</italic>, 7, 79-87. http://eprints.science-line.com/id/eprint/299/</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ngouana, T.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kana, J.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tsafack, N.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yemdjie, M.D.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mube, K.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kuiede, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Teguia, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Meimandipour, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2017</year>
            <article-title>Performances of Broiler Chickens Fed on Diet Supplemented with Thyme and Oregano Essential Oils Stabilized in a Plant Charcoal Matrix</article-title>
            <source>Journal of World’s Poultry Research</source>
            <volume>7</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tindo, T.R.K., Ngouana, T.R., Kana, S.A.D., Ciza, A.P., Donfack, M., Mouchili, M., Tchakount, F.M., Tchouan, D.G., Edie, N.L.W., Taboumda, E. and Kana, J.R. (2022) Effects of Neem Oil ( <italic>Azadirachta indica</italic>) on Feed Digestibility, Growth Performance and Gut Microbiota of Broiler Chickens. <italic>Scientific Journal of Animal Science</italic>, 10, 767-775.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Tindo, T.R.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ngouana, T.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kana, S.A.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ciza, A.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Donfack, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mouchili, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tchakount, F.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tchouan, D.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Edie, N.L.W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Taboumda, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kana, J.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Digestibility, G</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Effects of Neem Oil (Azadirachta indica) on Feed Digestibility, Growth Performance and Gut Microbiota of Broiler Chickens</article-title>
            <source>Scientific Journal of Animal Science</source>
            <volume>10</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">IUCN (2005) A Guide to Medicinal Plants in North Africa, <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic>. Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation, Cairo, 106.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Africa, C</string-name>
              <string-name>Cooperation, C</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2005</year>
            <article-title>A Guide to Medicinal Plants in North Africa, Cupressus sempervirens</article-title>
            <source>Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation</source>
            <volume>106</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tumen, I., Suntar, I., Keles, H. and Akkol, E.K. (2012) A Therapeutic Approach for Wound Healing by Using Essential Oils of Cupressus and Juniperus Species Growing in Turkey. <italic>Evidence</italic>- <italic>Based</italic><italic>Complementary</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Alternative</italic><italic>Medicine</italic>, 2012, Article ID: 728281. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/728281 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2012/728281</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21941588</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/728281">https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/728281</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Tumen, I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Suntar, I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Keles, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Akkol, E.K.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>A Therapeutic Approach for Wound Healing by Using Essential Oils of Cupressus and Juniperus Species Growing in Turkey</article-title>
            <source>Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine</source>
            <volume>2012</volume>
            <fpage>728281</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2012/728281</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21941588</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Emami, S.A., Khayyat, M.H., Rahimizadeh, M., Fazly-Bazzazb, S. and Assili, J. (2005) Chemical Constituents of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> L cv. Cereiformis Rehd Essential Oils <italic>.</italic><italic>Iranian</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Pharmaceutical</italic><italic>Sciences</italic>, 1, 33-36. https://www.sid.ir/en/vewssid/j_pdf/106720050106.pdf</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Emami, S.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Khayyat, M.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rahimizadeh, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Fazly-Bazzazb, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Assili, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2005</year>
            <article-title>Chemical Constituents of Cupressus sempervirens L cv</article-title>
            <source>Cereiformis Rehd Essential Oils. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences</source>
            <volume>1</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">EL-Sheikh, T.M.Y., Hassan, M.I., Moselhy, W.A., Amer, M.S. and Shehata, A.Z. (2011) Evaluation of the Biological Activity of Some <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>semprevirens</italic> (Cupressaceae) Extracts against the Mosquito Vector <italic>Culex pipiens</italic> L (Diptera: Culicidae). <italic>Egypt</italic><italic>Academy</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>Biology</italic><italic>Sciences</italic>, 4, 33-48. https://eajbsa.journals.ekb.eg/article_15170.html https://doi.org/10.21608/eajbsa.2011.15170 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21608/eajbsa.2011.15170</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.21608/eajbsa.2011.15170">https://doi.org/10.21608/eajbsa.2011.15170</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>EL-Sheikh, T.M.Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hassan, M.I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Moselhy, W.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Amer, M.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Shehata, A.Z.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2011</year>
            <article-title>Evaluation of the Biological Activity of Some Cupressus semprevirens (Cupressaceae) Extracts against the Mosquito Vector Culex pipiens L (Diptera: Culicidae)</article-title>
            <source>Egypt Academy Journal Biology Sciences</source>
            <volume>4</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21608/eajbsa.2011.15170</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Moussa, A.M., Emam, A.M., Diab, Y.M., Mahmoud, M.E. and Mahmoud, A. (2011) Evaluation of Antioxidant Potential of 124 Egyptian Plants with Emphasis on the Action of <italic>Punica</italic><italic>granatum</italic> Leafs Extract on Rats. <italic>International</italic><italic>Food</italic><italic>Research</italic><italic>Journal</italic>, 18, 535-542.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Moussa, A.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Emam, A.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Diab, Y.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mahmoud, M.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mahmoud, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2011</year>
            <article-title>Evaluation of Antioxidant Potential of 124 Egyptian Plants with Emphasis on the Action of Punica granatum Leafs Extract on Rats</article-title>
            <source>International Food Research Journal</source>
            <volume>18</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <label>17.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Asgary, S., Naderi, G.A., Ardekani, M.R.S., Sahebkar, A., Airin, A., Aslani, S., Kasher, T. and Emami, S.A. (2013) Chemical Analysis and Biological Activities of <italic>Cupressus</italic><italic>sempervirens</italic> Horizontalis Essential Oils <italic>.</italic><italic>Pharmaceutical</italic><italic>Biology</italic>, 51, 137-144. https://doi.org/10.3109/13880209.2012.715168 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3109/13880209.2012.715168</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23167275</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3109/13880209.2012.715168">https://doi.org/10.3109/13880209.2012.715168</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Asgary, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Naderi, G.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ardekani, M.R.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sahebkar, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Airin, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Aslani, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kasher, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Emami, S.A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2013</year>
            <article-title>Chemical Analysis and Biological Activities of Cupressus sempervirens Horizontalis Essential Oils</article-title>
            <source>Pharmaceutical Biology</source>
            <volume>51</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3109/13880209.2012.715168</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23167275</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <label>18.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Verma, V., Sharma, V., Singh, V., Kumar, R., Khan, M.F., Singh, A.K., Sharma, R., Arya, K.R., Maikhuri, J.P., Dalela, D., Maurya, R. and Gupta, G. (2014) Labda-8(17),12,14-Trien-19-Oic Acid Contained in Fruits of <italic>Cupressus sempervirens</italic> Suppresses Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Rat and <italic>in Vitro</italic> Human Models through Inhibition of Androgen and STAT-3 Signaling. <italic>Phytotherapy Research</italic>, 28, 1196-1203. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.5114 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ptr.5114</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24399792</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.5114">https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.5114</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Verma, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sharma, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Singh, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kumar, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Khan, M.F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Singh, A.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sharma, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Arya, K.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Maikhuri, J.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dalela, D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Maurya, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Gupta, G.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Labda-8(17),12,14-Trien-19-Oic Acid Contained in Fruits of Cupressus sempervirens Suppresses Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Rat and in Vitro Human Models through Inhibition of Androgen and STAT-3 Signaling</article-title>
            <source>Phytotherapy Research</source>
            <volume>8</volume>
            <issue>17</issue>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ptr.5114</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24399792</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <label>19.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ali, S.A., Rizk, M.Z., Ibrahim, N.A., Abdallah, M.S., Sharara, H.M. and Moustafa, M.M. (2010) Protective Role of <italic>Juniperus</italic><italic>phoenicea</italic> and <italic>Cupressus sempervirens</italic> against CCl <sub>4</sub>. <italic>World</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>Gastrointestinal</italic><italic>Pharmacology</italic>, 1, 123-131. https://doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v1.i6.123 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4292/wjgpt.v1.i6.123</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21577307</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v1.i6.123">https://doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v1.i6.123</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ali, S.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rizk, M.Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ibrahim, N.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Abdallah, M.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sharara, H.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Moustafa, M.M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2010</year>
            <article-title>Protective Role of Juniperus phoenicea and Cupressus sempervirens against CCl4</article-title>
            <source>World Journal Gastrointestinal Pharmacology</source>
            <volume>1</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4292/wjgpt.v1.i6.123</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21577307</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <label>20.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">Ulusal, B.G., Tufan, H., Ulusal, A.E., Haberal, C., Seyhan, T., Borman, H. and Haberal, M. (2009) Pretreatment with Cypress Cones Water Extract Enhances Survival of Ischemically Challenged Skin Flaps a Preliminary Study. <italic>Türk Plastik Rekonstrüktif</italic><italic>Ve Estetik Cerrahi Dergisi</italic>, 17, 25-29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228680629</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ulusal, B.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tufan, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ulusal, A.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Haberal, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Seyhan, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Borman, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Haberal, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>Pretreatment with Cypress Cones Water Extract Enhances Survival of Ischemically Challenged Skin Flaps a Preliminary Study</article-title>
            <source>Türk Plastik Rekonstrüktif Ve Estetik Cerrahi Dergisi</source>
            <volume>17</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <label>21.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Selim, S.A., Adam, M.E., Hassan, S.M. and Albalawi, A.R. (2014) Chemical Composition, Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activity of the Essential Oil and Methanol Extract of the Mediterranean Cypress ( <italic>Cupressus sempervirens</italic> L.). <italic>BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine</italic>, 14, Article No. 179. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1472-6882-14-179 https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-179 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1472-6882-14-179</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24890383</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-179">https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-179</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Selim, S.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Adam, M.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hassan, S.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Albalawi, A.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Composition, A</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Chemical Composition, Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activity of the Essential Oil and Methanol Extract of the Mediterranean Cypress (Cupressus sempervirens L</article-title>
            <source>). BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine</source>
            <volume>14</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1472-6882-14-179</pub-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24890383</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <label>22.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Al-Snafi, A.E. (2016) Medical Importance of <italic>Cupressus sempervirens</italic>—A Review. <italic>IOSR</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Pharmacy</italic>, 6, 66-76. https://doi.org/10.9790/3013-0680176108 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.9790/3013-0680176108</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.9790/3013-0680176108">https://doi.org/10.9790/3013-0680176108</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Al-Snafi, A.E.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Medical Importance of Cupressus sempervirens—A Review</article-title>
            <source>IOSR Journal of Pharmacy</source>
            <volume>6</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.9790/3013-0680176108</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <label>23.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="book">Harborne, J.B. (1973) Methods of Plant Analysis. In: Harborne, J.B., Ed., <italic>Phytochemical Me</italic><italic>thods</italic>, Springer, Dordrecht, 1-32. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-009-5921-7_1 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5921-7_1 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-94-009-5921-7_1</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5921-7_1">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5921-7_1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="book">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Harborne, J.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Harborne, J.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Methods, S</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>1973</year>
            <article-title>Methods of Plant Analysis</article-title>
            <source>In: Harborne</source>
            <volume>1</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-94-009-5921-7_1</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <label>24.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">Kana, J.R., Tadjong, R.N., Kuietche, H.M., Tefack, Y., Zambou, H. and Teguia, A. (2014) Valorisation des residus de manioc en substitution du maïs dans la ration alimentaire du poulet de chair. <italic>Livestock Research for Rural Developmen</italic>t, 26, Article No. 48. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd26/3/kana26048.htm</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kana, J.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tadjong, R.N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kuietche, H.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tefack, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zambou, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Teguia, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Valorisation des residus de manioc en substitution du maïs dans la ration alimentaire du poulet de chair</article-title>
            <source>Livestock Research for Rural Development</source>
            <volume>26</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <label>25.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">CEAEQ (2015) Recherche et denombrement simultane des coliformes fecaux et d’escherichia coli dans l’eau potable avec le milieu de culture mi; methode par filtration sur membrane. Centre D’Expertise en Analyse Environnementale du Quebec, Quebec. https://www.ceaeq.gouv.qc.ca/methodes/pdf/ma700fecec10.pdf</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Quebec, Q</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Recherche et denombrement simultane des coliformes fecaux et d’escherichia coli dans l’eau potable avec le milieu de culture mi; methode par filtration sur membrane</article-title>
            <source>Centre D’Expertise en Analyse Environnementale du Quebec</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <label>26.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Abdel-Fattah, S.A., El-Sanhoury, M.H., El-Mednay, N.M. and Abdel-Azeem, F. (2008) Thyroid Activity, Some Blood Constituents, Organs Morphology and Performance of Broiler Fed Supplemental Organic Acids. <italic>International</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Poultry Science</italic>, 7, 215-222. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.215.222 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3923/ijps.2008.215.222</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.215.222">https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.215.222</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Abdel-Fattah, S.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>El-Sanhoury, M.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>El-Mednay, N.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Abdel-Azeem, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Activity, S</string-name>
              <string-name>Constituents, O</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2008</year>
            <article-title>Thyroid Activity, Some Blood Constituents, Organs Morphology and Performance of Broiler Fed Supplemental Organic Acids</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Poultry Science</source>
            <volume>7</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3923/ijps.2008.215.222</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <label>27.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">Kana, J.R., Teguia, A. and Tchoumboue, J. (2010) Effect of Dietary Plant Charcoal from <italic>Canarium schweinfurthii</italic> Engl. and Maize Cob on Aflatoxin B1 Toxicosis in Broiler Chickens. <italic>Livestock Research for Rural Development</italic>, 22, Article No. 77. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd22/4/kana22077.htm</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kana, J.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Teguia, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tchoumboue, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2010</year>
            <article-title>Effect of Dietary Plant Charcoal from Canarium schweinfurthii Engl</article-title>
            <source>and Maize Cob on Aflatoxin B1 Toxicosis in Broiler Chickens. Livestock Research for Rural Development</source>
            <volume>22</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <label>28.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kengni, N.G.J., Kana, J.R., Ngouana, T.R., Ebile, D.A., Tchouan, D.G., Necdem, T.B.V., Edie, N.L.W., Ngwa, B.E. and Teguia, A. (2020) Effects of Supplementing Graded Levels of Methenamine in Drinking Water on Growth Performance, Gut Microbiota, Organs Histology and Haemato-Biochemical Profile of Broiler Chickens. <italic>Scientific Journal of Animal Science</italic>, 9, 587-598.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kengni, N.G.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kana, J.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ngouana, T.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ebile, D.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tchouan, D.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Necdem, T.B.V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Edie, N.L.W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ngwa, B.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Teguia, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Performance, G</string-name>
              <string-name>Microbiota, O</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2020</year>
            <article-title>Effects of Supplementing Graded Levels of Methenamine in Drinking Water on Growth Performance, Gut Microbiota, Organs Histology and Haemato-Biochemical Profile of Broiler Chickens</article-title>
            <source>Scientific Journal of Animal Science</source>
            <volume>9</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <label>29.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Oleforuh-Okoleh, V.U., Ndofor-Foleng, H.M., Olorunleke, S.O. and Uguru, J.O. (2015) Evaluation of Growth Performance, Haematological and Serum Biochemical Response of Broiler Chickens to Aqueous Extract of Ginger and Garlic. <italic>Journal of Agricultural Science</italic>, 7, 167-173. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v7n4p167 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5539/jas.v7n4p167</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v7n4p167">https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v7n4p167</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Oleforuh-Okoleh, V.U.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ndofor-Foleng, H.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Olorunleke, S.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Uguru, J.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Performance, H</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Evaluation of Growth Performance, Haematological and Serum Biochemical Response of Broiler Chickens to Aqueous Extract of Ginger and Garlic</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Agricultural Science</source>
            <volume>7</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5539/jas.v7n4p167</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <label>30.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Masood, S., Nastaran, S., Omid, K.-H., Maral, M., Saeed, A.-Z. and Mojtaba, F. (2018) Effects of <italic>Cupressus sempervirens</italic> Extract on the Healing of Acetic Acid-Induced Ulcerative Colitis in Rat <italic>.</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Coloproctology</italic>, 38, 309-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcol.2018.07.002 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jcol.2018.07.002</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcol.2018.07.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcol.2018.07.002</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Masood, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nastaran, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Omid, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Maral, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Saeed, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mojtaba, F.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>Effects of Cupressus sempervirens Extract on the Healing of Acetic Acid-Induced Ulcerative Colitis in Rat</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Coloproctology</source>
            <volume>38</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jcol.2018.07.002</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <label>31.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Ebile, D.A., Kana, J.R., Edie, N.L.W., Pimagha, M.H.J., Nguefack, D.G., Ngouana, T.R., Mube, K.H. and Fonteh, A.F. (2018) Growth Performance, Gut Microbiota and Haemato-Biochemical Profile of Quails Fed Diet Supplemented with Graded Levels of <italic>D</italic>. <italic>glomerata</italic> Fruit Powder. <italic>Animal</italic><italic>and</italic><italic>Veterinary</italic><italic>Sciences</italic>, 6, 80-87. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20180605.13 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11648/j.avs.20180605.13</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20180605.13">https://doi.org/10.11648/j.avs.20180605.13</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ebile, D.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kana, J.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Edie, N.L.W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pimagha, M.H.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nguefack, D.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ngouana, T.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mube, K.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Fonteh, A.F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Performance, G</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>Growth Performance, Gut Microbiota and Haemato-Biochemical Profile of Quails Fed Diet Supplemented with Graded Levels of D</article-title>
            <source>glomerata Fruit Powder. Animal and Veterinary Sciences</source>
            <volume>6</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11648/j.avs.20180605.13</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <label>32.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kana, J.R., Doue, M., Kreman, K., Diarra, M., Mube, K.H., Ngouana, T.R. and Teguia, A. (2015) Effect of Raw Sweet Potato ( <italic>Ipomea batatas</italic> L.) Meal Particle Size on Broiler Growth Performance. <italic>Livestock Research for Rural Development</italic>, 27, Article 40.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kana, J.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Doue, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kreman, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Diarra, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mube, K.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ngouana, T.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Teguia, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Effect of Raw Sweet Potato (Ipomea batatas L</article-title>
            <source>) Meal Particle Size on Broiler Growth Performance. Livestock Research for Rural Development</source>
            <volume>27</volume>
            <elocation-id>40</elocation-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <label>33.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">El-DEEK, A.A., Al-Harthi, M.A., Mona, O., Al-Jassas, F. and Rehab, N. (2012) Hot Pepper ( <italic>Capsicum</italic><italic>annum</italic>) as an Alternative to Oxytetracycline in Broiler Diets and Effects on Productive Traits, Meat Quality, Immunological Responses and Plasma Lipids. <italic>Archiv fur Geflugelkunde</italic>, 76, 73-80.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>El-DEEK, A.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Al-Harthi, M.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mona, O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Al-Jassas, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rehab, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Traits, M</string-name>
              <string-name>Quality, I</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>Hot Pepper (Capsicum annum) as an Alternative to Oxytetracycline in Broiler Diets and Effects on Productive Traits, Meat Quality, Immunological Responses and Plasma Lipids</article-title>
            <source>Archiv fur Geflugelkunde</source>
            <volume>76</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <label>34.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Etim, N.N., Williams, M.E., Akpabio, U. and Offiong, E.E.A. (2014) Haematological Parameters and Factors Affecting Their Values. <italic>Agricultural Sciences</italic>, 2, 37-47.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Etim, N.N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Williams, M.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Akpabio, U.</string-name>
              <string-name>Offiong, E.E.A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Haematological Parameters and Factors Affecting Their Values</article-title>
            <source>Agricultural Sciences</source>
            <volume>2</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <label>35.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Issac, L.J., Abah, G., Akpan, B. and Ekaette, I.U. (2013) Haematological Properties of Different Breeds and Sexes of Rabbits. <italic>Proceedings of the</italic>18 <italic>th Annual Conference of Animal Science Associated of Nigeria</italic>, Abuja, 8-12 September 2013, 24-27.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="confproc">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Issac, L.J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Abah, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Akpan, B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ekaette, I.U.</string-name>
              <string-name>Nigeria, A</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2013</year>
            <article-title>Haematological Properties of Different Breeds and Sexes of Rabbits</article-title>
            <source>Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of Animal Science Associated of Nigeria</source>
            <volume>8</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <label>36.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Onu, P.N. (2010) Evaluation of Two Herbal Spices as Feed Additives for Finisher Broilers. <italic>Biotechnology</italic><italic>in</italic><italic>Animal</italic><italic>Husbandry</italic>, 26, 383-392. https://doi.org/10.2298/BAH1006383O <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2298/BAH1006383O</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2298/BAH1006383O">https://doi.org/10.2298/BAH1006383O</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Onu, P.N.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2010</year>
            <article-title>Evaluation of Two Herbal Spices as Feed Additives for Finisher Broilers</article-title>
            <source>Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry</source>
            <volume>26</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2298/BAH1006383O</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <label>37.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yasar, J., Sarzamin, K., Naila, C., Muhammad, M., Asad, S., Rafiullah and Abdul, J.T. (2012) Comparative Efficacy of Different Schedules of Administration of Medicinal Plants Mixed Infusion on Hematology of Broilerchicks. <italic>Sarhad</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>Agricultu</italic><italic>re</italic>, 28, 327-331.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Yasar, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sarzamin, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Naila, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Muhammad, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Asad, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Abdul, J.T.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>Comparative Efficacy of Different Schedules of Administration of Medicinal Plants Mixed Infusion on Hematology of Broilerchicks</article-title>
            <source>Sarhad Journal Agriculture</source>
            <volume>28</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <label>38.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Prasad, R., Rose, M.K., Virmani, M., Garg, S.L. and Puri, J.P. (2009) Lipid Profile of Chiken ( <italic>Gallus domesticus</italic>) in Response to Dietary Supplementation of Garlic ( <italic>Allium sativum</italic>). <italic>International</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Poultry Science</italic>, 8, 270-276. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&amp;type=pdf&amp;doi=42055ef1535d1d0f69f618800540bb11ef746b02 https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2009.270.276 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3923/ijps.2009.270.276</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2009.270.276">https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2009.270.276</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Prasad, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rose, M.K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Virmani, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Garg, S.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Puri, J.P.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>Lipid Profile of Chiken (Gallus domesticus) in Response to Dietary Supplementation of Garlic (Allium sativum)</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Poultry Science</source>
            <volume>8</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3923/ijps.2009.270.276</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <label>39.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Dieumou, F.E., Teguia, A., Kuiate, J.R., Tamokou, J.D., Fonge, N.B. and Dongmo, M.C. (2009) Effects of Ginger ( <italic>Zingiber officinale</italic>) and Garlic ( <italic>Allium sativum</italic>) Essential Oils on Growth Performance and Gut Microbial Population of Broiler Chickens. <italic>Livestock Research for Rural Development</italic>, 21, 23-32.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Dieumou, F.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Teguia, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kuiate, J.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Tamokou, J.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Fonge, N.B.</string-name>
              <string-name>Dongmo, M.C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2009</year>
            <article-title>Effects of Ginger (Zingiber officinale) and Garlic (Allium sativum) Essential Oils on Growth Performance and Gut Microbial Population of Broiler Chickens</article-title>
            <source>Livestock Research for Rural Development</source>
            <volume>21</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B40">
        <label>40.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Al-Shuwaili., M.A., Ibrahim, I.E. and Naqi Al-Bayati, M.T. (2015) Effect of Dietary Herbal Plants Supplement in Turkey Diet on Performance of Some Blood Biochemical Parameters. <italic>Global Journal of Bio</italic>- <italic>Science and Biotechnology</italic>, 4, 85-89.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ibrahim, I.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Al-Bayati, M.T.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Effect of Dietary Herbal Plants Supplement in Turkey Diet on Performance of Some Blood Biochemical Parameters</article-title>
            <source>Global Journal of Bio-Science and Biotechnology</source>
            <volume>4</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B41">
        <label>41.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Elaroussi, M.A., Mohamed, F.R., Elgendy, M.S., El Barkouky, E.M., Abdou, A.M. and Hatab, M.A. (2008) Ochratoxicosis in Broiler Chickens: Functional and Histological Changes in Target Organs. <italic>International Journal of Poultry Science</italic>, 7, 414-422. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.414.422 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3923/ijps.2008.414.422</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.414.422">https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.414.422</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Elaroussi, M.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mohamed, F.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Elgendy, M.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Barkouky, E.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Abdou, A.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hatab, M.A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2008</year>
            <article-title>Ochratoxicosis in Broiler Chickens: Functional and Histological Changes in Target Organs</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Poultry Science</source>
            <volume>7</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3923/ijps.2008.414.422</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B42">
        <label>42.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Pineda, L., Chwalibog, A., Sawosz, E., Lauridsen, C., Engberg, R., Elnif, J., Hotowy, A., Sawosz, F., Yuhong, G., Abdalla, A. and Heshmat, S.M. (2012) Effect of Silver Nanoparticles on Growth Performance, Metabolism and Microbial Profile of Broiler Chickens. <italic>Archives</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Animal</italic><italic>Nutrition</italic>, 66, 416-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2012.710081 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/1745039X.2012.710081</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2012.710081">https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2012.710081</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Pineda, L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Chwalibog, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sawosz, E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lauridsen, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Engberg, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Elnif, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hotowy, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Sawosz, F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Yuhong, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Abdalla, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Heshmat, S.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Performance, M</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>Effect of Silver Nanoparticles on Growth Performance, Metabolism and Microbial Profile of Broiler Chickens</article-title>
            <source>Archives of Animal Nutrition</source>
            <volume>66</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/1745039X.2012.710081</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>