<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Geosciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8359</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ijg.2024.153014</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">IJG-131962</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Structural Controls Analysis and Its Correlation with Geothermal Occurrence at Barrier Volcanic Complex (BVC), Turkana, Kenya
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Philip</surname><given-names>Lomorukai Emekwi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nicholas</surname><given-names>O. Mariita</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Patrick</surname><given-names>Chege Kariuki</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Geothermal Training and Research Institute (GeTRI), Dedan Kimathi University of Technology, Nyeri, Kenya</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>25</day><month>03</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>231</fpage><lpage>245</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>11,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2024</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>25,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Geothermal is a clean energy source that is freely available in the subsurface. The exploitation of this vital resource needs intensive exploration in order to identify and quantify its occurrence. The three parameters considered when assessing the viability of a geothermal system include; heat source, fractures and fluids. Geological structures are important in transportation of fluids to and from the heat source aiding in recharge of the geothermal system and enhancing productivity. Remote sensing method was applied in mapping the structures at Barrier Volcanic Complex (BVC) by using hill shading technique which utilized four illumination angles of the sun (azimuth) 
  i.e
  . 45
  &#176;, 90&#176;, 150&#176;, and 315&#176;, constant elevation of 45&#176; and exaggeration of 10. The data used was Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM) Satellite Imagery. ArcGIS Software was used for lineaments delineation and density mapping, PCI Geomatica was used to generate major faults, while Georose and Rockworks
   
  17 were used to generate the rose diagrams. Geological structural analysis was done by delineating lineaments, determining the density distribution of lineaments and finally determining the structural trends of lineaments. The generated major faults in the area and the location of the occurrence of surface manifestations were compared with the generated lineaments. A total of 260 lineaments were generated whereby at 45
  &#176; there was a total of 60 lineaments, at 90&#176; 95 lineaments, at 150&#176; 61 lineaments, and at 315&#176; 44 lineaments. The results of structural analysis in the area as shown by the rose diagrams indicate an NNE-SSW and N-S trending of structures. In conclusion, the study area is highly fractured as indicated by the presence of numerous lineaments. These lineaments provide good recharge to the geothermal system and enhance the geothermal reservoir in the area.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Geothermal Resource</kwd><kwd> Lineaments</kwd><kwd> Lineaments Density</kwd><kwd> Structural Controls</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Barrier Volcanic Complex (BVC) is a geothermal prospect situated at Turkana, along the East African Rift System (EARS) specifically the Kenyan rift. It is 20 km in length and 15 km wide, and forms a natural dam across the inner trough separating Lake Turkana from Suguta Valley. The prospect covers an area of 380 km<sup>2</sup>. Geographically, it is located at coordinates 2.3192˚N, 36.5879˚E (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>BVC is a composite structure that is made up of four separate volcanic centers. These centers include Barrier, Kalolenyang, Kakorinya, and Likau (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). They are made up of different kinds of lava, namely; basanite, basalt, hawaiite, mugearite, benmorite, trachyte, and phonolite, among others. Kakorinya is the youngest of the volcanic centers. Dindi (2020) reported that the Kenyan rift is an active system with volcanic activities taking place hence surface geothermal manifestations like hot springs, geysers, fumaroles, altered grounds, occurrence at the rift zone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131962-ref1">1</xref>] . This is evident in BVC through occurrence of</p><p>fumaroles and the upper western and southern flanks of the caldera having hot hydrothermally altered grounds. A number of sites on the rim of the caldera have silica veins and sinters, both of which are indicators of the presence of active hot springs in the past.</p><p>Synoptic view in remote sensing enables enhanced visualization and better understanding of the relation between the whole terrain of an area and its features [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131962-ref2">2</xref>] . Several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of remote sensing techniques for identifying the structural controls. Hamimi et al., 2020 applied remote sensing technique in mapping geological structures at Atalla Shear Zone and Environs, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt where band rationing was performed for Landsat images for the true and false color composites which revealed the NE to NNE orientation of the structures in the study area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131962-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>Skakni et al. (2022) used an integrated Geographic Information System (GIS), Remote Sensing and resistivity approach to conduct a structural mapping of initially inaccessible zones in the North-Western Rift Belt in Morocco [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131962-ref4">4</xref>] . The study combined Principal Component Analysis, directional filtering, and Optimal Index Factor to generate images for mapping the lithology of the zone.</p><p>Due to active tectonic setting of a prospect such as BVC, remote sensing approach is essential in order to detect morphological changes by identifying the significant difference between the multi-temporal Landsat images [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131962-ref5">5</xref>] and the elevation changes using Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM). Field mapping of lineaments is expensive and time consuming, hence use of remote sensing has been widely applied [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131962-ref5">5</xref>] in lineaments delineation.</p><p>Geothermal Development Company (GDC) of Kenya did geoscientific studies (geophysics, geology and geochemistry) in 2011 to ascertain the potential of geothermal resource in the study area. They found that the area has a potential of about 700 MWe for electrical generation. Since the potential of the study area was estimated by GDC, there was need to study the structural controls that act as conduits to recharging the geothermal system in the area. This therefore, prompted the application of remote sensing technique in this research to map and analyze the structural controls at Barrier Volcanic complex (BVC). This is because understanding fracture distribution is crucial in siting of exploratory wells, reservoir management, as well as ensuring sustainable geothermal resource production. Presence of water is important to the future exploitation of the geothermal resource in the area to avoid drilling of tight wells. All these needs necessitated the application of remote sensing satellite imagery and Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) in mapping of structural controls in the study area since it has been applied in many geothermal fields for exploration and exploitation expansive purposes.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Geological Setting</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Tectonic and Geological Setting</title><p>BVC is located in the Turkana rift zone which is within the Kenyan Rift system. The Kenya Rift is comprised of both the Turkana Rift Zone and the Kenya Rift Zone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131962-ref6">6</xref>] . It generally follows the boundary between the Proterozoic Mozambique Belt and the Archean Tanzania Craton [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131962-ref7">7</xref>] . The northern, central, and southern segment of the Kenya Rift have half graben geometries due to earlier faulting and pronounced subsidence along the western boundary faults [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131962-ref6">6</xref>] . For most of the structural evolution of the Kenya Rift, faulting has been controlled by an E-W oriented position of minimum stress [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131962-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>Volcanic activity in Turkana rift, which was followed by activity moving southwards, was the initial step in the formation of the Kenya rift during the early Miocene (14 - 23 Ma BP). Faulting that occurred in conjunction with rifting took place in many stages, beginning with faulting on the western side, which was accompanied by basaltic and phonolitic volcanism on the crust of the uplift [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131962-ref9">9</xref>] . Major faults extended along the western side, generating a half graben that was bordered on the eastern side by a monoclinic flexure. At the same time, the development of massive basaltic-trachytic shield volcanoes was taking place. On the eastern side, major faults formed, which resulted in the transformation of the half graben into a complete graben and was followed by basalt-trachyte volcanism.</p><p>Around 5 million years ago (Miocene epoch), the graben structure began to take shape. Subsequently, fissure eruptions in the axis of the rift led to the creation of flood lavas between 2 and 1 million years ago (Quaternary period). Within the axis of the rift, volcanic activity has been growing increasingly intense over the past two million years. Large Quaternary shield volcanoes, notably the Barrier Volcanic Complex, began to form along the Kenya rift axis during this time period. The majority of these volcanoes are geothermal potential areas.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Stratigraphy</title><p>Volcanism in BVC commenced with the eruption of strongly undersaturated flood basalts from a series of fissures along the eastern margin of the trough. Trachyte volcanism commenced with the eruption of lavas and pyroclastic flows from Likaiu East and Kalolenyang volcanoes in the period extending from at least 1.3 Ma to 0.7 Ma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131962-ref10">10</xref>] . These eruptions build up steep sided edifices, the summit of which later collapsed to form craters. Small volumes of basalts were erupted at a late stage. Rejuvenation of rift margin structures faulted and tilted this center before the next phase of activity.</p><p>Likau West (0.5 - 0.2 Ma) is poorly exposed. The summit area is covered by small trachyte and phonolite lava domes and associated pyroclastic deposits. Volcanism on the BVC culminated with the formation of Kakorinya volcano (&gt;0.2 Ma to Recent). The construction of the lava shield was accompanied by the eruption of extensive pyroclastic flow deposit and air-fall tuff on the western flanks of the volcano. Collapse of the summit area of Kakorinya took place in two stages. Two outer ring faults formed immediately after the Upper trachytes were erupted and were associated with limited basaltic activity on the summit area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). These fractures are post-dated by trachyte lava domes and widespread air-fall tuffs, the eruption of which triggered the formation of the caldera at 92 ka [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131962-ref10">10</xref>] , as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> below shows the generalized stratigraphy of the Barrier Volcanic Complex.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Stratigraphy of Barrier Volcanic Complex (BVC) as constructed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131962-ref10">10</xref>] </title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="13"  >1.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >KAKORINYA VOLCANO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Recent Basalts and Mugearites (K<sup>by</sup>, K<sup>my</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 Ka - 1921</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Recent Phonolites (K<sup>py</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Upper Basalts (K<sup>bu</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trachyte lavas and domes (K<sup>t</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58 &#177; 4 ka</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CALDERA FORMATION AND FAULTING</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pyroclastic deposits (K<sup>vu</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92 &#177; 2 Ka</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trachyte lava domes (K<sup>td</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RING FRACTURE AND FAULTING</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lower Basalts (K<sup>bl</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lower Trachytes (K<sup>tu</sup>) including pyroclastic deposits</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >221 &#177; 4 - 97 &#177; 3 Ka</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lower Trachytes (K<sup>tl</sup>) including pyroclastic deposits</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Faulting</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >2.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LIKAIU WEST VOLCANO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hawaiite lavas (LW<sup>h</sup>) and Basalt lavas (LW<sup>b</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trachyte and phonolitic pyroclastic flow and breccia deposits (LW<sup>tv</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Basalts of Namurinyang tuff cone (N<sup>b</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FAULTING</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >3.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KALOLENYANG VOLCANO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mugearite lavas (KLm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Basalt lavas (KLb)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trachyte lavas (KLt) and pyroclastic flow deposits</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >773 &#177; 7 - 707 &#177; 6 Ka</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >4.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LIKAIU EAST</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trachyte lavas (Let) and pyroclastic flow deposits</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.37 - 1.34 Ma</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FOUNDATION ROCKS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Basalt lavas of Logipi and Latarr (B<sup>b</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) Data</title><p>The digital elevation SRTM data was downloaded from Earth Explorer USGS website. The period of the data was 01-01-2000 to 31-12-2020, a range of 20 years. The image with less atmospheric noise was selected and downloaded for processing and analysis using the WGS-84 datum, and 37N UTM zone map projection. The study area was clipped out using the BVC shapefile. The clipped image was double-blurred to smooth it for clear geological structural identity.</p><p>PCI Geomatica was used for generating major geological structures in the area. The digital elevation model of BVC was imported into the software, run it, and the results was generated in terms of a shapefile of major geological structures i.e. faults in the area. ArcGIS was used for drawing the lineaments and generating a structural density map. The lineaments generated from ArcGIS were exported into Rockworks 17 in form of file for generation of a rose diagram.</p><p>The geological structural analysis was done in three steps namely; delineation of lineaments, determination of lineaments density and finally determination of major trends of lineaments. The results of the analyses gave a clear map on the trend of structures that influence the geothermal system in the study area. The steps used are further discussed in the proceeding text.</p><sec id="s3_1_1"><title>3.1.1. Delineation of Lineaments</title><p>Lineaments are surface manifestations of structurally controlled features, such as joints, straight course of streams and vegetation alignments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131962-ref11">11</xref>] . Hill-shading technique was used in delineation of structures. This technique recognizes the use of Digital elevation model (DEM) to generate lineaments by producing a map with different shades of gray [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131962-ref12">12</xref>] . Hill shading map shows the terrain representation and geomorphological tilting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131962-ref13">13</xref>] . The technique has been applied by map users in many fields including Geographic Information Systems (GIS), cartography, and 3D terrain visualization.</p><p>The aim was to map all the possible lineaments that can be recognized on the SRTM Satellite Imagery in the study area by utilizing four illumination directions of 45˚, 90˚, 150˚, and 315˚, a constant elevation of 45˚ and exaggeration of 10. ArcGIS was used in applying this concept.</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_2"><title>3.1.2. Determination of Lineaments Density</title><p>This stage provides the concentration of lineaments delineated from the previous step. The frequency of the lineaments per unit area (pixel) that will result in a lineament density map was determined at this stage. In each pixel grid, the grid sections were measured in length. The calculation’s outcome is then represented by a middle point in the middle of each grid. The output of the representation was contours that display the significant amount of obtained contour based on the concentration of lineaments.</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_3"><title>3.1.3. Determination of Major Trends of Lineaments</title><p>Major trends were determined by use of lineament densities. All delineation step results are collated, and Rose diagrams were created to determine the main direction of the lineaments produced. Major trends show the regional flow of fluids and the occurrence of geothermal resource. The results can be supported by the sites/locations of surface manifestations within the study area.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Ground Truthing</title><p>The GPS was used for collecting coordinates of the structures mapped on-site. The Branton Compass was used for recording the strikes and dips, see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. The data on the location of hot springs and fumaroles was obtained from Ol Suswa Energy Limited which has been licensed to explore the geothermal resource in BVC. The raw data on strikes and dips was input into the Georose Software and the results were the generation of a Rose diagram. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3 shows the distribution and location of the mapped structures.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Lineaments Delineation</title><p>The total number of lineaments generated in the study area were 260; whereby at an azimuth of 45˚ a total of 60 lineaments, at 90˚ was 95 lineaments, at 150˚ was 61, and at 315˚ was 44 lineaments were generated. The lineaments generated for different Azimuths are shown in Figures 4-7. The results were compiled into one map as represented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>.</p><p>The hot springs in the southern part of the area occurring in the East-West direction are evident with results generated by PCI Geomatica but not evident with ArcGIS drawn lineaments. It is also evident that the geothermal manifestations i.e., hot springs and fumaroles (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>) in the area occur along the delineated geological structures. The E-W occurring structures indicated by hot springs can be as a result of folding.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Lineaments Density</title><p>For analysis and construction of lineaments density map the lineaments shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> were used. From the color ramp of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0, the highest density areas are represented in red while low density areas are represented in green, and lowest/no lineament areas are in white color. From the results, there is localised high concentration of lineaments in the four volcanic centers which shows high potential for occurrence of geothermal resource. However, there could be an impermeable layer that separates Kalolenyang to the western part of the area with the other three volcanic centers hence having a separate geothermal system with distinct recharge.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Determination of Major Trends</title><p>The results from the two previous steps were used to determine the major trends in the study area. The delineated lineaments were compiled and processed to generate a Rose diagram that shows the dominant orientation of the lineaments as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1.</p><p>From <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1, the geological structures at BVC are trending in the NNE-SSW, and N-S. These trends of geological structures might have been as a result of faulting towards the east as reported by (10). The North-South trending is associated with the North trending normal faulting at the rift margin that led to the formation of the inner trough of BVC as well basalts of Logipi.</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Ground Truthing</title><p>To ensure the accuracy of the data, ground truthing was necessary for the calibration and validation of remote sensing models. This increased the precision and reliability of the analysis and result in more informed decision-making processes by cross-referencing data from remote sensing with information from the ground (See <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2). Ground truthing was done by measuring the strikes and dips at BVC in order to confirm the major trends (See <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The raw data on strikes and dips was input into the Georose Software and the results were the generation of a Rose diagram shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3.</p><p>This involved collection of on-site data to enhance the accuracy of data obtained remotely and was done by visiting the study area and taking measurements of strikes and dips, coordinates of the mapped structures, and general ground topography (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). 12 accessible structures in the area were mapped and the result was a generation of a rose diagram shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3. The trend of structures is in the NE-SW direction which supports the structural trends in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1. This validated the reliability and legitimacy of information extracted from satellite imagery.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Location data for mapped structures at BVC</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Mapped structures at Barrier volcanic complex</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >S/NO</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Strike angle</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Dip angle</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Coordinates</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Longitudes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Latitudes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >310</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.630609</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.395663</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >285</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.557031</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.391862</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >305</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.657670</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.391638</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >315</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.643581</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.416462</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >312</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.545401</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.394545</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >317</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.609811</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.381127</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >292</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.620993</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.380456</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >280</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.535785</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.388283</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >294</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.624795</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.365248</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.560609</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.363906</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >302</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.645817</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.417133</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >310</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.536455</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.401926</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Coordinates of fumaroles and hot springs at BVC</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Station Name</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Coordinates</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Longitudes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Latitudes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.58538</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.308319</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.592061</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.331877</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.563979</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.337632</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HS1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.541564</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.255656</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HS2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.543037</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.256074</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HS3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.545795</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.256811</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HS4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.548778</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.256653</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The study shows good distribution of lineaments with major trends occurring in the NNE-SSW, and N-S, hence presumed to have been influenced by the east faulting in the area. This is supported by the high density of lineaments in the same direction. Geothermal surface manifestations in the area, fumaroles and hot springs, occur in the NE-SW &amp; E-W direction along the mapped lineaments/faults, which can be used as an effective observatory method for exploring and locating possible drilling locations in future exploitation of geothermal resource in the area.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Emekwi, P.L., Mariita, N.O. and Kariuki, P.C. (2024) Structural Controls Analysis and Its Correlation with Geothermal Occurrence at Barrier Volcanic Complex (BVC), Turkana, Kenya. International Journal of Geosciences, 15, 231-245. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2024.153014</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.131962-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dindi, E.W. (2020) Kenya Rift Valley: Tectonics, Natural Resources, Hazards and Hazard Mitigation. 3rd Annual Science for Sustainable Development Conference, 14-16 October 2020, Nairobi, 1-22.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131962-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mather, P.M. and Koch, M. (2011) Front Matter. Computer Processing of Remotely-Sensed Images. John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd., New York, i-xxv.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131962-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hamimi, Z., Hagag, W., Kamh, S. and El-Araby, A. (2020) Application of Remote-Sensing Techniques in Geological and Structural Mapping of Atalla Shear Zone and Environs, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 13, 414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05324-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131962-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Skakni, O., Hlila, R., Pour, A. B., Martín Martín, M., Maate, A., Maate, S., Muslim, A. M. and Hossain, M. S. (2022) Integrating Remote Sensing, GIS and In-Situ Data for Structural Mapping over a Part of the NW Rif Belt, Morocco. Geocarto International, 37, 3265-3292. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2020.1852611</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131962-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, H. and Shi, Z. (2020) A Spatial-Temporal Attention-Based Method and a New Dataset for Remote Sensing Image Change Detection. Remote Sensing, 12, 1662. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12101662</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131962-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chapman, G.R. and Brook, M. (1978) Chronostratigraphy of the Baringo Basin, Kenya. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 6, 207-223. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1978.006.01.16</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131962-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smith, M. and Mosley, P. (1993) Crustal Heterogeneity and Basement Influence on the Development of the Kenya Rift, East Africa. Tectonics, 12, 591-606. https://doi.org/10.1029/92TC01710</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131962-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bosworth, W., Lambiase, J. and Keisler, R. (1986) A New Look at Gregory’s Rift: The Structural Style of Continental Rifting. EOS Transactions, 67, 577-583. https://doi.org/10.1029/EO067i029p00577</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131962-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bosworth, W. (1987) Off-Axis Volcanism in the Gregory Rift, East Africa: Implications for Models of Continental Rifting. Geology, 15, 397-400. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1987)15&lt;397:OVITGR&gt;2.0.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131962-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dunkley, P., Smith, M., Allen, D.J. and Darling, W.G. (1993) The Geothermal Activity and Geology of the Northern Sector of the Kenya Rift Valley. British Geological Survey, Research Report SC/98/1. https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/507920/1/SC_93_1_Report.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131962-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Joseph Martial, A., Ondoa Joseph, M., Jean Bosco, O., Jean, E. and Paul Kemeng, M. (2013) Utilisation des modèles numériques de terrain (MNT) SRTM pour la cartographie des linéaments structuraux: Application à l’Archéen de Mezesse à l’est de Sangmélima (Sud-Cameroun). Geo-Eco-Trop: International Journal of Tropical Ecology and Geography, 37, 71-80. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286306846_Application_of_MNT_SRTM_numeric_field_models_for_mapping_structural_lineaments_Application_to_the_Mezesse_Archean_East_of_Sangmelima_South_Cameroon</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131962-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zeng, H., Xie, Z., Zhang, J., Zhu, Y., Zhao, F., Yang, S. and Zhao, X. (2021) A Methodology for Producing Realistic Hill-Shading Map Based on Shaded Relief Map, Digital Orthophotographic Map Fusion and IHS Transformation. Annals of GIS, 27, 371-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2021.1921026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131962-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maguire, D.J., Rhind, D.W. and Goodchild, M.F. (1991) Geographical Information Systems: Principles and Applications. Wiley, Hoboken.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>