<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2024.154019</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-131928</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Articles</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
          <subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>


          Electron G-Factor Anomaly and the Charge Thickness

        </article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Arlen</surname>
            <given-names>Young</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
            <sub>1</sub>
          </xref>
          <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">
            <sup>*</sup>
          </xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line>Independent Researcher, Palo Alto, CA, USA</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>18</day>
        <month>03</month>
        <year>2024</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>04</issue>
      <fpage>435</fpage>
      <lpage>447</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>7,</day>
          <month>February</month>
          <year>2024</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="rev-recd">
          <day>19,</day>
          <month>March</month>
          <year>2024</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>22,</day>
          <month>March</month>
          <year>2024</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2014</copyright-year>
        <license>
          <license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <p>


          The electron g-factor relates the magnetic moment to the spin angular momentum. It was originally theoretically calculated to have a value of exactly 2. Experiments yielded a value of 2 plus a very small fraction, referred to as the g-factor anomaly. This anomaly has been calculated theoretically as a power series of the fine structure constant. This document shows that the anomaly is the result of the electron charge thickness. If the thickness were to be zero, g = 2 exactly, and there would be no anomaly. As the thickness increases, the anomaly increases. An equation relating the g-factor and the surface charge thickness is presented. The thickness is calculated to be 0.23% of the electron radius. The cause of the anomaly is very clear, but why is the charge thickness greater than zero? Using the model of the interior structure of the electron previously proposed by the author, it is shown that the non-zero thickness, and thus the g-factor anomaly, are due to the proposed positive charge at the electron center and compressibility of the electron material. The author’s previous publication proposes a theory for splitting the electron into three equal charges when subjected to a strong external magnetic field. That theory is revised in this document, and the result is an error reduced to 0.4% in the polar angle where the splits occur and a reduced magnetic field required to cause the splits.

        </p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Electron G-Factor Anomaly</kwd>
        <kwd> Electron Charge Thickness</kwd>
        <kwd> Electron Positive Charge</kwd>
        <kwd> Electron Mass Thickness</kwd>
        <kwd> Electron Fractionalization</kwd>
        <kwd> Splitting the Electron</kwd>
        <kwd> Electron Compressibility Factor</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="s1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        As Einstein famously said towards the end of his life, “You know, it would be sufficient to really understand the electron.” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131928-ref1">1</xref>]
      </p>
      <p>The electron g-factor g is calculated from the charge and magnetic moment.</p>
      <p>The result shows that B E = g 2 α , where B is the magnetic field at the center of the</p>
      <p>electron, E is the electric field at the electron’s surface due to its charge q, and α is the fine structure constant. The magnetic field B is modeled to be created by many spinning subshells of charge, with the outermost subshell having a radius R, the classical electron radius, and the innermost subshell having a radius of R q i &lt; R . An equation is derived that relates g to the charge shell outer and</p>
      <p>
        inner radii ratio R q i R . The thickness of the outer shell mass was derived in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131928-ref2">2</xref>] . An improvement to that calculation is presented, and the result is a somewhat smaller inner radius R i of the outer shell mass.
      </p>
      <p>The charge shell is assumed to be embedded within the mass at the outer surface of the outer shell mass. A model is presented wherein the charge shell is stretched by the positive charge of the central core, thereby creating the non-zero thickness of the shell and thus the g-factor anomaly. From the anomaly, the compressibility factor of the electron’s outer shell mass is calculated.</p>
      <p>
        The splitting of the electron into three equal charges was modeled in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131928-ref2">2</xref>] . That model is modified in this document, with the result of lower error in the predicted angles at which the splits occur. All of the components of pressure on the electron’s outer surface are calculated. The splits are defined to occur at the polar angles Θ and 180 − Θ , where the total pressure on the surface is outward. The minimum magnetic field for splitting to occur is calculated.
      </p>
      <p>
        <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> contains some constants associated with the electron [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131928-ref3">3</xref>] . Unless otherwise specified, all units are CGS.
      </p>
     </sec></body>
       
         
         <back>
        <ref-list>
          <title>References</title>
          <ref id="scirp.131928-ref1">
            <label>1</label>
            <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mac Gregor, M.H. (2013) The Enigmatic Electron, Chapters 7, 17. 2nd Edition, El Mac Books, Santa Cruz, Reprint of 1992 Original.</mixed-citation>
          </ref>
          <ref id="scirp.131928-ref2">
            <label>2</label>
            <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Young, A. (2023) Journal of Modern Physics, 14, 1563-1577. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2023.1412090</mixed-citation>
          </ref>
          <ref id="scirp.131928-ref3">
            <label>3</label>
            <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Young, A. (2023) Journal of Modern Physics, 14, 553-561. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2023.145031</mixed-citation>
          </ref>
          <ref id="scirp.131928-ref4">
            <label>4</label>
            <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McDonald, K.T. (2008, August 10) Electromagnetic Fields of a Rotating Shell of Charge. Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=&amp;ved=2ahUKEwii0fvEyLb9AhXJiO4BHReXBIEQFnoECCUQAQ&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fkirkmcd.princeton.edu%2Fexamples%2Frotatingshell.pdf&amp;usg=AOvVaw3nuuv3640EW2oztXV2nNdL</mixed-citation>
          </ref>
          <ref id="scirp.131928-ref5">
            <label>5</label>
            <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weisstein, E.W. (2007) Electron Radius. WolframResearch, Champaign, IL.https://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/ElectronRadius.html</mixed-citation>
          </ref>
          <ref id="scirp.131928-ref6">
            <label>6</label>
            <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yavorsky, B. and Detlaf, A. (1975) Handbook of Physics. Mir Publishers, Moscow, 477.</mixed-citation>
          </ref>
          <ref id="scirp.131928-ref7">
            <label>7</label>
            <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Young, A. (2022) Journal of Modern Physics, 13, 1117-1127. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2022.137064</mixed-citation>
          </ref>
        </ref-list>
      </back>
</article>