<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2024.153012</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-131869</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Morphological Characterization of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Associated with the Rhizosphere According to the Age of &lt;i&gt;Xanthosoma sagittifolium&lt;/i&gt; L. Schott Plants in the Field
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Audrey</surname><given-names>Maguy Bengono Nyimiebolo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Astride</surname><given-names>Carole Djeuani</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hermann</surname><given-names>Désiré Mbouobda</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Antoine</surname><given-names>Marie Kevin Tiki</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Theresa</surname><given-names>Akinimbom Moma</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Diobe</surname><given-names>Motassy Manuela</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Samuel</surname><given-names>Brice Adounga</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Christophe</surname><given-names>Fendju Pangueko</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>Nshanji</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Issofa</surname><given-names>Nguetrapouna</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rose</surname><given-names>Theophine Derricka Djem Moutamal</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>A.</surname><given-names>Ziem Amang Amang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nicolas</surname><given-names>Niemenak</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Departments of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, University of Yaoundé 1, Yaoundé, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Plant Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Laboratory of Plant Physiology, Department of Biological Sciences, Higher Teacher Training College (HTTC), University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Biology, Higher Teacher Training College, Bambili (HTTC), The University of Bamenda, Bamenda, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>14</day><month>03</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>161</fpage><lpage>179</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>16,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2024</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>20,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The objective of this work was to carry out a morphological characterization of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the rhizosphere of 
  Xanthosoma sagittifolium L. Schott plants. The plant material used was the white and red cultivars of 
  X. sagittifolium, belonging to age intervals of 3 - 6, 6 - 9, and 9 - 12 months. Three harvest sites were chosen in the Central Region of Cameroon. In each site, soil from the rhizosphere and plant roots was collected in a randomized manner. In the field, the agronomic parameters were evaluated. The physicochemical characteristics of the soils, the mycorrhization index, and the morphological characterization of the mycorrhizal types of each site were carried out. The results obtained show that the agronomic growth parameters varied significantly using the Student Newman and Keuls Test depending on the harvest sites. The soils’ pH in all sites was acidic and ranged between 4.6 and 5.8. The Nkometou site has a loamy texture while the Olembe and Soa sites have loam-clay-sandy and loam-clay textures respectively. The highest 
  mycorrhization frequencies appeared at the Nkometou site, with 75 and 87.33% of the white and red cultivars plant roots at 6 - 9 and 3 - 6 months. The relative abundance of AMF arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal spores in the rhizosphere of 
  X. sagittifolium plants varied with age and cultivar. There were 673 spores between 9 - 12 months in Nkometou in the red cultivar. Six AMF genera were identified in all the different soils collected: 
  Acaulospora sp., 
  Funneliformis sp., 
  Gigaspora sp., 
  Glomus sp., 
  Scutellospora sp., and 
  Septoglomus sp. The genus 
  Glomus sp. was the most present at all age intervals in both cultivars.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Xanthosoma sagittifolium&lt;/i&gt; L. Schott</kwd><kwd> Rhizosphere</kwd><kwd> Harvest Site</kwd><kwd> Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi</kwd><kwd> Diversity</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Xanthosoma sagittifolium L. Schott is ranked among the most important tuberous plants in the world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref1">1</xref>] , Africa is the main source of production through Nigeria, Cameroon, and Ghana [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref2">2</xref>] . This plant is consumed in most African countries and its production is ensured by small farmers with limited resources and mainly women. Formerly classified among neglected plants authors are increasingly giving capital interest to the cultivation of X. sagittifolium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref4">4</xref>] . This speculation is a staple food for populations in tropical and subtropical regions, for human and animal nutrition. The leaves and tubers of the plant are the parts mainly consumed. The tubers are rich in minerals such as calcium, phosphorus, potassium, and magnesium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref6">6</xref>] . Leaves and flowers contain apigenin, which gives to plant anti-cancer and anti-diabetic properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>Mycorrhization tests show that an application of allochthonous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in X. sagittifolium plants contributes to improving not only their growth but also to boosting the production of seed minitubers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref10">10</xref>] . This application of mycorrhizal fungi in propagators also makes it possible to increase the production of PIF seed plants in X. sagittifolium and likewise their growth in the field [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref13">13</xref>] . However, by concluding that X. sagittifolium is a mycotrophic plant, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref9">9</xref>] highlights the hypothesis of calling into question the knowledge of the biodiversity of indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated to the rhizosphere of X. sagittifolium plants. So many questions needed to be answered likewise; are there specific species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with the rhizosphere of X. sagittifolium? Do communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the rhizosphere vary depending on the soil type, plants age, harvest site, etc.? Do the white and red cultivars of X. sagittifolium establish symbiosis with the same types of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi species? Exploring the diversity of indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the rhizosphere of X. sagittifolium can depend on the cultivars. That is why this research work focuses on the determination of the different potential genera of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with the rhizosphere of white and red cultivars in X. sagittifolium. More specifically, the investigations will make it possible to: evaluate the agronomic parameters plants of X. sagittifolium white and red cultivars in the field following the age; the nature of the soils associated with the rhizosphere according to the different harvesting sites; and to determine a morphological characterization of different genus of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi present in the rhizosphere.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study and Sampling Sites</title><p>The soil and root sample collection sites used are located in the Central region of Cameroon. The harvests were carried out in Nkometou, (L&#233;ki&#233; Department, at geographical coordinates; 4˚5'29''N and 11˚36'16''E, with 600 m of altitude), Olembe (Mfoundi Department, at 3˚56'43''N and 11˚31'46''E, with 690 m of altitude), and Soa, (Department of Mefou and Akono at 3˚59'45''N and 11˚36'49''E, with 680 m of altitude) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). These three sites belong to the forest agroecological zone with bimodal rainfall of Cameroon, characterized by a humid equatorial climate.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Evaluation of Agro Morphological Growth Parameters in X. sagittifolium Plants in the Field According to Harvest Sites</title><p>The plant material used consisted of plants of the white and red cultivars of X. sagittifolium with age intervals of 3 - 6, 6 - 9, and 9 - 12 months. These plants were chosen in the field in a randomized manner at each site. The field of each site had a minimum size of 1 ha. For each age group, agronomic growth parameters such as average plant height; the average diameter at the collar of the plants; the average number of leaves, the average leaf area; the average number of roots, and the average weight of the roots [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref14">14</xref>] , were evaluated on 10 X. sagittifolium plants chosen at random in the field following the harvest sites.</p><p>From these same previously selected plants, the soil of the rhizosphere, as well as root fragments were taken for laboratory analyses.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Sampling and Analysis of Physicochemical Soil Parameters</title><p>Each sample of these soils was taken at a depth of 0 - 20 cm using an auger at the level of the rhizosphere of the X. sagittifolium plants. For each age group (3 - 6, 6 - 9, and 9 - 12 months) of the targeted plants in each harvest site, three repetitions were carried out. These soils by age group will then be mixed. 500 g, will be bagged then labeled, and brought back to the laboratory for analysis. Analyzes of the physicochemical characteristics of these soils were carried out at the University of Dschang, by the Soil Analysis and Environmental Chemistry Research Unit of the Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences. The physical parameters of the soil (sand, clay and silt contents) and chemical parameters (pH-H<sub>2</sub>O and pH-KCl), organic carbon (CO) content, total nitrogen content (N), exchangeable base content (Ca, Mg, K and Na), cation exchange capacity (CEC) and assimilable phosphorus content (P Bray II), exchangeable base sum (EBS) and the rate of saturation (V), were determined and analyzed according to the standards of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref17">17</xref>] protocols.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Determination of the Mycorrhizal Status of Plant Root Fragments in X. sagittifolium Histological Analysis and Assessment of Mycorrhizal Status</title><p>The root hairs of X. sagittifolium of the white and red cultivars collected in the field at each site were cleaned, drained, and sectioned to a size of 0.5 to 1.0 cm. The protocol of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref18">18</xref>] was used. These root hairs were soaked in 10 g∙L<sup>−1</sup> KOH for 15 minutes at 90˚C, then rinsed with HCl (10%). The dye used was trypan blue 1 g∙L<sup>−1</sup>. Microscopic observations were carried out using the HYMEN brand optical microscope at 400X. 100 of these fragments were observed for each age group and per site. Mycorrhizal status was calculated following the scale proposed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref18">18</xref>] . The parameters F%, M%, m%, a%, A%, v% and V% were calculated.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Extraction, Enumeration, and Characterization of Spores</title><p>The method of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref19">19</xref>] was used for the extraction and enumeration of spores in the soil. This method is based on sieving the soil through a set of superimposed sieves having different mesh diameters; 0.5; 0.25; 0.125 and 0.0625 &#181;m. 10 mL of pellet from each soil sample sieved according to the age groups (3 - 6, 6 - 9, and 9 - 12 months), will be observed under a binocular magnifying glass with an X40 objective. An exhaustive count of spores for each age group was carried out in the watch glasses. This operation was carried out in 10 fields and an average was calculated based on the number of spores found. Thus, the total number of spores/soil collected was evaluated from the sum of the number obtained in sieves 2, 3, and 4 (0.25; 0.125; 0.0625 &#181;m). Spore density was determined for each soil sample. The different spores resulting from the extraction and enumeration of soils were described morphologically according to the identification keys of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref20">20</xref>] , from the International Culture Collection of Arbuscular and Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref21">21</xref>] , and the European Bank of Glomales. The classification of species was made using the method of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref22">22</xref>] . Species diversity was measured using the species richness of the diversity indices of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref23">23</xref>] . The Shannon index (H) varying from 0 (a single species, or one species very largely dominant over all the others) to log S (when all the species have the same abundance) was calculated according to the following formula:</p><p>H = − ∑ i = 1 S n i / N L o g ( n i / N )</p><p>Where: S = total number of species; Ni = number of individuals of gender (i) in a given category; N = total number of individuals of all genders in a given category; log2 = logarithm to base 2; H = Shannon diversity index.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Statistical Analyzes</title><p>The results obtained were the subject of a descriptive analysis (Mean &#177; standard deviation). The results are represented in the form of graphs and tables (Microsoft Excel 2013 software). The IBM SPSS Version 20.0 software was used to carry out the statistical analyses and to compare the means using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the Student-Newman-Keuls test at the 5% threshold.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Agronomic Parameters Recorded in the White and Red Cultivars of X. sagittifolium in the Field in the Different Harvest Sites Following the Age Month Intervals</title><p>The average plant height varied significantly at P &lt; 0.05 by the Student Newman and Keuls Test in plants of the two cultivars of X. sagittifolium. We see that this height increases depending on the age interval and the site (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Low average height values were recorded for both cultivars between 3 - 6 months of growth. X. sagittifolium plants presented greater average heights at the Nkometou site compared to those of Soa and Olembe. The plants of the white cultivar appear larger than those of the red cultivar. We note significant average values of 133.13 &#177; 040.60 and 158.73 &#177; 007.54 cm, between 6 - 9 and 9 - 12 months respectively in the Nkometou site. The average diameter at the collar showed maximum values greater than 7cm at the age interval of 9 - 12 months, in X. sagittifolium plants from the Nkometou site (07.53 &#177; 01.02 cm) in the cultivar white. In plants of the cultivar, it is 07.74 &#177; 02.66 and 07.65 &#177; 01.35 cm, respectively at the age interval of 9 - 12 months, in Olembe and Soa. The average number of leaves did not vary significantly in the Student Newman and Keul Test in all cultivars (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>Generally speaking, the average leaf area of the leaves increases significantly (P &lt; 0.05) following the age interval for the white and red cultivars (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). At the age interval of 6 - 9 months, this average leaf area of leaves appears very large in both cultivars. A maximum of 1840.52 &#177; 371.41 cm<sup>2</sup> is recorded, at a growth</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Variation in agronomic parameters of white and red cultivars of X. sagittifolium plants in the field following age intervals</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Cultivars</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Harvest sites</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Age month interval</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Growth parameters evaluated</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average plant height (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average collar diameter (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average number of leaves</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average leaf area (cm&#178;)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average number of roots</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average root weight (g)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="9"  >White</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Nkometou</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >062.30 &#177; 18.16bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02.36 &#177; 00.51a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01.66 &#177; 00.57a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >483.59 &#177; 095.12ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.00 &#177; 05.29ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.23 &#177; 01.64b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >133.13 &#177; 40.60e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >05.00 &#177; 00.45b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >03.00 &#177; 01.00a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1534.72 &#177; 237.04cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.66 &#177; 08.14bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.69 &#177; 05.64c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 - 12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >158.73 &#177; 07.54f</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >07.53 &#177; 01.02c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >03.00 &#177; 01.00a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1840.52 &#177; 371.47d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.33 &#177; 09.01d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >186.38 &#177; 26.94c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Olembe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >057.24 &#177; 01.82bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02.06 &#177; 00.98a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02.00 &#177; 01.00a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >406.83 &#177; 093.02ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.80 &#177; 07.00ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01.78 &#177; 00.54a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >038.60 &#177; 09.38ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01.28 &#177; 00.55a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01.60 &#177; 00.57a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >197.53 &#177; 029.77ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.40 &#177; 03.60ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04.24 &#177; 00.34a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 - 12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103.15 &#177; 1.35d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >05.25 &#177; 03.18b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >03.50 &#177; 00.50a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1402.57 &#177; 324.17cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.00 &#177; 49.49bcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.96 &#177; 14.04b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Soa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >024.50 &#177; 10.40a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.96 &#177; 00.17a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01.80 &#177; 00.00a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >137.87 &#177; 019.21ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.20 &#177; 01.73bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >09.79 &#177; 00.92a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >074.66 &#177; 05.68c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04.48 &#177; 00.25b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >03.83 &#177; 00.94a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >758.78 &#177; 143.27abc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.66 &#177; 17.21bcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >316.65 &#177; 27.13e</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 - 12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121.6 &#177; 08.88de</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >05.44 &#177; 00.46b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >03.20 &#177; 00.81a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1091.20 &#177; 25.08bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.60 &#177; 07.09bcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200.69 &#177; 08.73d</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="9"  >Red</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Nkometou</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >062.83 &#177; 07.25bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01.43 &#177; 00.60a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01.66 &#177; 00.57a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >228.01 &#177; 041.73ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.66 &#177; 07.3ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >07.70 &#177; 01.34a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102.76 &#177; 12.91d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04.30 &#177; 01.57b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02.33 &#177; 00.57a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >681.86 &#177; 148.32abc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.33 &#177; 40.06bcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108.91 &#177; 28.75c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 - 12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >118.33 &#177; 04.61de</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >06.93 &#177; 00.05bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04.00 &#177; 01.00a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1294.21 &#177; 289.74bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >106.00 &#177; 12.76f</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >223.59 &#177; 16.14 d</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Olembe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >054.52 &#177; 12.56b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01.80 &#177; 00.45a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01.80 &#177; 00.57a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >293.89 &#177; 074.20ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >09.80 &#177; 01.52 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04.26 &#177; 00.66a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >078.35 &#177; 21.78c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04.05 &#177; 00.66b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01.75 &#177; 00.57a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >500.99 &#177; 167.78ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.75 &#177; 13.22abc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.85 &#177; 04.13b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 - 12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125.24 &#177; 38.58e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >07.74 &#177; 02.66c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >03.20 &#177; 00.88a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1542.34 &#177; 115.29c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.20 &#177; 27.50cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >164.26 &#177; 15.32c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Soa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >026.25 &#177; 02.80a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01.14 &#177; 00.15a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01.85 &#177; 00.47a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >152.91 &#177; 050.93a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.57 &#177; 07.37ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.75 &#177; 00.20a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >070.00 &#177; 05.39bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04.10 &#177; 00.60b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >03.00 &#177; 00.00a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >862.56 &#177; 287.74bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.16 &#177; 09.50abc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >133.25 &#177; 01.82c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 - 12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >133.11 &#177; 05.29e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >07.65 &#177; 01.35c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >03.50 &#177; 00.81a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2564.55 &#177; 417.76d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.00 &#177; 39.87e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >625.42 &#177; 18.86f</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Student Newman Keuls tests.</p><p>Data sharing the same letter in the same column and for each treatment were not significantly different at the 5% level.</p><p>age interval of 9 - 12 months, in plants of the white cultivar of X. sagittifolium, from the Nkometou site. In plants of the red cultivar, it is 3119.33 &#177; 517.76 cm<sup>2</sup> at the age interval of 9 - 12 months at the Soa site. However, the results show an increase in the values of the number and average weight of roots over time (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The average number of roots varies significantly (P &lt; 0.05) with a maximum value of 106.00 &#177; 012.72, recorded in plants of the red cultivar from the Nkometou site. However, for the average weight of fresh roots harvested, although it is low for the age interval of 3 - 6 months, it should be noted that the significant values are 316.65 &#177; 27.13 and 625.42 &#177; 18.86 g, respectively for plants of white and red cultivars from the Soa site at the age interval of 6 - 9 and 9 - 12 months (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Physicochemical Characteristics of the Soil at Different Sites</title><p>The physical properties of the soils studied varied according to the three sites (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). From the analysis triangle of the mineral texture of the soils, we note</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Physicochemical analyses of the soils of X. sagittifolium plant rhizosphere in each harvest site. Sand (S%), clay (L%), and Loam (L%) contents. pH (aqueous (pH-H<sub>2</sub>O) and acid (pH-KCl)), carbon (C), total nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), organic matter (OM). Exchangeable bases (Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup> and Na<sup>+</sup>); Cation exchange capacity (CEC); Assimilable phosphorus content (P Bray II); Exchangeable Base Sum (EBS), Saturation Rate (V)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Harvest sites</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >pH</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >EBS (cmol∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >CEC (cmol∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >K<sup>+</sup> (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Ca<sup>2+</sup> (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Mg<sup>2+</sup> (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Na<sup>+</sup> (%)<sup> </sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >V (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >OM (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >P (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >N (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >C (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >C/N</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Physical analysis</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Texture</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KCl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clay (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Loan (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sand (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nkometou</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Loamy</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Olembe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Loamy-clayey-Sandy</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Soa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >168.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.455</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Loamy-Clayey</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>that the Nkometou site has a loamy texture, with 23.25% clay, 46.75% silt, and 30% sand. The Olembe and Soa sites have respectively loam-clay-sand textures (31.25% clay, 9.5% silt, 59.25% sand) and loamy-clay (35.75%). % clay, 40% silt, and 24.25% sand). The soils of the different study sites showed an acidic character. The pH of water and hydrochloric acid is between 4.6 and 5.8 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The results of these soils from the three X. sagittifolium cultivation sites have an average organic matter content. We record 3.18; 3.54 and 3.89% respectively in Nkometou, Olembe, and Soa. The Nkometou site appears richest in total nitrogen. The C/N ratio is very high at the Soa site with a peak of 4.96 but appears very low in the Nkometou (1.74) and Olembe (1.17) sites. The results also show that assimilable phosphorus was very high in the soil of the Soa site with a value of 168.99%. However, it should be noted that the low value of phosphorus content is recorded at the Nkometou site (5.81%). As for the soil of the Olembe site, it is moderately poor in phosphorus (40.54%). Furthermore, according to the standard proposed by Calvet and Villemin (1986), the three sites have high CEC contents. Furthermore, the sum of exchangeable bases varied very little with normal contents. It is 5.54 (0.03% Na<sup>+</sup>; 3.21% Ca<sup>2+</sup>; 0.98% Mg<sup>2+</sup>; 1.32% K<sup>+</sup>) for the Nkometou site, 5.6 (0.02% Na<sup>+</sup>; 2 .45% Ca<sup>2+</sup>; 1.08% Mg<sup>2+</sup>; 2.05% K<sup>+</sup>) for Olembe and 5.22 (0.01 Na<sup>+</sup>; 2.15% Ca<sup>2+</sup>; 1.21 Mg<sup>2+</sup>; 1.85 K<sup>+</sup>) for Soa.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Mycorrhizal Status of Plant Roots Following Harvest Sites as a Function of Harvest Age Month Interval</title><p>The results of the mycorrhizal status assessed varied according to the three harvest sites for the white and red cultivars (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The value of the percentage of vesicular intensity of AMF appears very low. The highest mycorrhization frequencies (F%) appear at the Nkometou site. The maxima were 75 and 87.33% respectively in the root hairs of plants of white and red cultivars at 6 - 9 and 9 - 12 months. At Nkometou, we note a higher intensity of mycorrhization compared to the Olembe and Soa sites (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The maxima are 40.73% for the mycorrhizal intensity (M%) for Nkometou red cultivar plants of 3 - 6 months, 61.02% for the mycorrhizal intensity in the root system (m%) at age interval of</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Mycorrhizal status of the roots of white and red cultivars X. sagittifolium plants, according to the age interval and according to the harvest site. F%: Frequency of mycorrhizal colonization, M%: Intensity of mycorrhizal colonization, m%: Intensity of mycorrhizal colonization in the root system, a%: Arbuscular content, A%: Arbuscular intensity in the root system, v%: Vesicular intensity of the mycorrhizal part and V%: Vesicular intensity in the root system. Numbers followed by the same letter in the same column are not significantly different in the Newman and Keuls Student Test (5%)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Cultivars</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Harvest sites</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Age month interval</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >Mycorrhizal status of the roots</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >m (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >a (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >v (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="9"  >White</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Nkometou</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 - 12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Olembe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >03.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 - 12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >08.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Soa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >06.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 - 12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="9"  >Red</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Nkometou</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.92</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 - 12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >08.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Olembe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >03.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >03.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 - 12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >03.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Soa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >05.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 - 12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >08.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >09.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00.01</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>3 - 6, and 6 - 9 months in plants from the Olembe site and 13.55% for arbuscular intensity in the root system (A%) at the age interval of 6 - 9 months for plants of the red Nkometou cultivar.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Relative Abundance and Diversity Index of Rhizosphere Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in X. sagittifolium Plants Following Harvest Sites as a Function of Harvest Age Month Interval</title><p>Graphs of the relative abundance of AMF spores in the rhizosphere of plants of X. sagittifolium cultivars white and red following the harvest site, several spores vary from one harvest site to another depending on age and cultivar (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(A) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(B); <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). In the white cultivar, the maxima were observed in plants aged between 9 - 12 months. It is 470,280, and 673 spores respectively at the site of Nkometou, Olembe, and Soa. Likewise, the results also show that the minimums were recorded in plants aged 3 - 6 months in Nkometou with a value of 112 spores in 50 g of soil (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(A)). In the red cultivar, the maxima are</p><p>notably at the age interval of 9 - 12 months (673 spores), 6 - 9 months (331 spores), and 3 - 6 (294 spores) respectively in the plants of X. sagittifolium in Nkometou, Olembe and Soa (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(B)). Low relative abundance was observed in plants aged 9 - 12 in the Soa site (33 spores). The Shannon and Weiner diversity index in the three collection sites presents a specific diversity of AMF of the rhizosphere in the plants of the white and red cultivars of X. sagittifolium in the Soa site compared to the Nkometou and Olembe (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Morphological Appearance of the Spores of AMF Associated with the Rhizosphere of Plants of the White and Red Cultivar of X. sagittifolium Following the Age Month Intervals</title><p>Observations of AMF spores under a microscope at 200 &#181;m showed significant variation between the spores associated with the rhizosphere of plants of white and red cultivars of X. sagittifolium, particularly in terms of shapes, colors, walls, and slits. spores. 6 genera of AMF have been recorded; Glomus sp. Acaulospora sp., Scutellospora sp., Septoglomus sp. Gigaspora sp., and Funneliformis sp (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). In white cultivars, of these six genera, the 5 AMF genera recorded are Acaulospora sp., Glomus sp., Gigaspora sp., Scutellospora sp., and Septoglomus sp. (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). While in the red cultivar, the results present Acaulospora sp., Gigaspora sp. Glomus sp. Funneliformis sp., and Scutellospora sp. (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). Glomus sp. spores were the most abundant genera in the rhizosphere of both cultivars at all ages. It also appears most represented at the rhizosphere of X. sagittifolium at Olembe and Soa, compared to Nkometou at the age interval of 6 - 9 and 9 - 12 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Correlation Study between the Evaluated Parameters</title><p>The factor plot of the principal component analysis of the data confirms a positive correlation between agronomic parameters and mycorrhizal status (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). This linear correlation, thanks to Pearson’s rank coefficient R, indicates a highly significant correlation at 5% at the age interval 9 - 12 months in the three sites, between the parameters; average size of plants, average number of leaves, average leaf surface, average diameter at the collar, average number of roots and average weight of roots, in the white cultivar plants from the Nkometou site and the same in the red cultivar plants from the sites by Olembe and Soa. Furthermore, it appears that all the parameters of the mycorrhization index are significantly correlated with the relative abundance of spores, in white cultivar plants from the Nkometou site, at the age interval, 3 - 6, 6 - 9, and 9 - 12 months. However, the analysis of the Pearson correlation between the physicochemical</p><p>parameters of the soils, the relative abundance of spores, and the Shannon index, presents a contribution from axis 1 (Fact. 1) of 75.23% and axis 2 (Fact. 2) by 24.77%. That is a total of 100% variability (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). It, therefore, appears at the</p><p>Soa site, a positive and significant correlation between the parameter’s assimilable phosphorus content, the abundance of spores, and the Shannon index (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). However, in Olembe, there is a significantly negative correlation for the pH-H<sub>2</sub>O and EBS parameters.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The morphological growth parameters varied significantly by the Student’s and Keuls’ Test at P &lt; 0.05. These parameters increase over time in all sites and are important at the Nkometou site compared to the Olembe and Soa sites. In Nkometou, the average plant sizes, collar diameter, leaf area, and number of plant roots presented higher values in the white cultivar compared to the red cultivar. This increase in growth parameters observed would be the result of the physiological response of the X. sagittifolium plants, to the availability of the nutrients necessary for their growth on one hand in the soils of these sites and on the other hand, the presence of microorganisms in these soils which are in symbiosis with X. sagittifolium plants, would contribute to the improvement of their hydromineral nutrition. These beneficial soil microorganisms provide favorable conditions for plant development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref24">24</xref>] . The very high average number of roots between 9 - 12 months, in both cultivars and all sites, would explain that at this age, X. sagittifolium plants would need more nutrients to ensure not only its hydromineral nutrition but also storage in tubers. Furthermore, this variation in agronomic growth parameters recorded between month intervals in white and red cultivars, at all sites, could also be the result of variation in physicochemical characteristics such as; the pH, the sum of exchangeable bases, the C/N ratio, etc. in the soils of these different sites. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref25">25</xref>] , have also shown that soil pH and hydromineral nutrition significantly influence growth in poplar (Populus tremuloides), jack pine (Pinus banksiana), and white spruce (Picea glauca) seeds grown on sand. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref26">26</xref>] , the nature and properties of the soil play a critical role in plant growth.</p><p>The results of soil analysis present physicochemical characteristics that differ relatively from one site to another. The soils of the Nkometou site have a loamy texture, compared to those of Olembe and Soa, which are loamy-clay-sandy and loamy-clayey respectively. The textures of these three sites appear suitable for the cultivation of X. sagittifolium. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref27">27</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref28">28</xref>] , these soil texture types are easily well-drained and well-aerated. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref29">29</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref30">30</xref>] , showed that growth and optimal tuberization in X. sagittifolium require light soils, rich in organic matter, well-drained, deep, well loosened and having a pH between 5.5 and 6.5. Chemical analyses show that the different soils of the three sites studied have acidic pHs, with values between 5.6 and 5.8 for pH (H<sub>2</sub>O) and 4.6 and 4.8 for pH (HCl). The majority of Cameroonian soils are acidic [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref31">31</xref>] . According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref28">28</xref>] , X. sagittifolium plants exhibit optimum growth and production at a pH varying between 5.5 and 6.5 (pH-H<sub>2</sub>O). However, it has been shown that pH (5.8 to 6.3) is satisfactory for good biological activity and nutritional exchanges in the soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref32">32</xref>] . The soils of these three harvest sites had a C/N ratio &lt; 6, which would reflect the rapid decomposition of organic matter. These soils were very rich in total nitrogen with values all &gt; 0.25. The Olembe site, with a loamy-clayey-sandy texture, had a greater sand richness compared to the other sites and likewise a higher total nitrogen content. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref33">33</xref>] emphasize that, in sandy soils, which are soils with great aeration, the mineralization of nitrogen is very rapid. According to the fertility scale for assimilable phosphorus of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref34">34</xref>] , the assimilable phosphorus contents varied significantly. The values recorded were 5.81 ppm (Nkometou), 40.54 ppm (Olembe), and 168.99 ppm (Soa). The soils of the Nkometou site appeared poor in phosphorus. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref35">35</xref>] , mentioned that the soils poverty in phosphorus and also the impact of acidity on the CEC of the soil are characteristic of tropical soils. In the soils of the different sites studied, the CEC is higher in Olembe compared to Nkometou and Soa. Of the four exchangeable bases determined, the percentage of Potassium (K<sup>+</sup>) is higher compared to Calcium (Ca<sup>2+</sup>), Magnesium (Mg<sup>2+</sup>), and Sodium (Na<sup>+</sup>). These minerals are involved in important physiological processes for plants: photosynthesis, fruitification, cell permeability, and ionic balances [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref36">36</xref>] . This high K<sup>+</sup> content is very beneficial for X. sagittifolium plants. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref36">36</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref37">37</xref>] showed that potassium not only contributes to strengthening cell walls but also to increasing leaf surface area and consequently, the chlorophyll content of leaves in plants.</p><p>The results show that the mycorrhizal status values varied depending on the cultivars and the age range of the plant. The work of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref9">9</xref>] showed that X. sagittifolium is a mycotrophic plant. This variation in mycorrhizal status values would be influenced not only by the root renewal that plants make during their growth but also by the properties of the soil. The high (in Nkometou) or low (in Olembe and Soa) mycorrhization frequencies in the two cultivars at all age intervals could be explained by the fact that the mycorrhizal infection is the result of the AMF response. to the effects of hormones emitted by plants. Generally, the high frequency of mycorrhization in plants from 6 - 9 months can be explained by the fact that at this age, the plants already carry out the physiological phenomenon of tuberization (storage). However, this storage in plants requires good photosynthesis. However, in symbiosis, X. sagittifolium plants should also respond in terms of carbohydrate cost to AMF. In plants of the red cultivar, from the Nkometou site, the highest frequency of mycorrhization was observed in plants aged 3 - 6 months. This could be justified by the fact that these plants were located on an anthill. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref38">38</xref>] , show that the presence of ants in the soil would influence the symbiosis through the process of bioturbation, which, due to the high temperatures in the anthills, would not only lead to the accumulation of mycorrhiza spores. In the soil, ants and termites act like earthworms; they contribute to the establishment of the symbiosis between plants and microorganisms through the release of phytohormones [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref39">39</xref>] .</p><p>Results for relative spore abundance varied from site to site. This relative abundance of spores appears very high in plants of X. sagittifolium, with an age interval of 9 - 12 months in the three sites in plants of the white cultivar. However, we note a value of 673 spores/50g of rhizosphere soil in plants from the NKOMETOU site in plants of the red cultivar. This high abundance observed could be explained by the fact that the lower the phosphorus levels in the soil, the higher the quantity of spores appears. Similar results were obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref40">40</xref>] , with Bambara groundnut plants. The analysis of this abundance made it possible to understand the richness and diversity of the AMF communities present in each site. This variation could also be attributed to environmental conditions. Moreover, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref41">41</xref>] report that this abundance of spores depends on the physicochemical properties of the soil. Likewise, the availability of nutrients in the soil would influence the presence of spores. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref42">42</xref>] , loamy and sandy soils with nutrient deficiency would have a high number of AMF propagules and species. The variation in spore density could also be attributed to the presence of plant cover, which would contribute to the creation of a vast network of hyphae and interconnections with the roots of host plants, improving not only biomass but also the microbial activity of the soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref43">43</xref>] . The soils of Nkometou and Soa showed a higher quantity of spores compared to the soil of Olembe. Additionally, the soil at the Soa site showed a higher amount of assimilable phosphorus and an acidic pH at a value of 5.6. However, at this pH value, the phosphorus in the soil is in dihydrogen phosphate form, which can be assimilated by the plant. The results of this work reveal a spore density estimated at 5457 spores for the total of 150 g of soil for the three collection sites, this density is significantly higher than that obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref44">44</xref>] (around 4045 spores per 100 g of soil) under cowpea cultivation in the different agroecological zones of Benin.</p><p>The six AMF genera were identified in the two cultivars of X. sagittifolium in the three study sites following the age intervals. These were the genera Acaulospora sp., Funneliformis sp., Gigaspora sp., Glomus sp., Scutellospora sp., and Septoglomus sp., belonging to three families; Acaulosporaceae, Gigasporaceae, and Glomeraceae. These different types of AMF identified were not present in all the harvested sites. It is noted that, in the rhizosphere of plants with white cultivars, the AMF genera recorded were Acaulospora sp., Gigaspora sp., Glomus sp., Scutellospora sp., and Septoglomus sp. Whereas, in plants of the red cultivar, these are the genera Acaulospora sp., Gigaspora sp., Glomus sp., Funneliformis sp., and Scutellospora sp. The genus Septoglomus sp., was only present in the rhizosphere of X. sagittifolium plants of the white cultivar while Scutellospora sp. only appeared in the rhizosphere of the red cultivar plants. However, the genus Glomus sp. appeared most in the rhizosphere of X. sagittifolium at the sites of Olembe and Soa, compared to Nkometou at the age intervals of 6 - 9 and 9 - 12. The work of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref45">45</xref>] showed that the soils of Cameroon are richer in AMF of the genus Glomus sp. Similarly, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131869-ref46">46</xref>] highlighted the richness of the AMF of Glomus sp. in the rhizosphere of Gossypium hirsutum L. plants in North Cameroon. This abundance of the Glomus sp. genus could be explained by the fact that this species of AMF can multiply or reproduce and adapt to extreme conditions and acidic soils. Furthermore, the Shannon index greater than 1 obtained at the Soa site explains the diversity of AMF observed associated with the rhizosphere of Xanthosoma sagittifolium plants.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>This pioneering study made it possible to highlight a few genera of AMF associated with the rhizosphere of white and red cultivars of Xanthosoma sagittifolium L. Schott plants in the field. Of the three study sites with different physicochemical properties, it should be noted that the genus of AMF, which was more represent in all age intervals is the genus Glomus sp. The genus Septoglomus sp., was only present in the rhizosphere of X. sagittifolium plants of the white cultivar while Scutellospora sp. only appeared in the rhizosphere of plants of the red cultivar.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgments</title><p>The authors would like to thank the Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry of the Higher Teachers’ Training College of the University of Yaound&#233; 1 and the Laboratory of Parasitology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, University of Yaound&#233; I.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflict and interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Bengono Nyimiebolo, A.M., Djeuani, A.C., Mbouobda, H.D., Tiki, A.M.K., Moma, T.A., Manuela, D.M., Adounga, S.B., Fendju Pangueko, C., Nshanji, J., Nguetrapouna, I., Djem Moutamal, R.T.D., Amang Amang, AZ. and Niemenak, N. (2024) Morphological Characterization of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Associated with the Rhizosphere According to the Age of Xanthosoma sagittifolium L. Schott Plants in the Field. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 15, 161-179. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2024.153012</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.131869-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Otekunrin, A.O., Sawicka, B., Adeyonu, G.A. and Rachon, L. (2021) Cocoyam [Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott]: Exploring the Production, Health and Trade Potentials in Sub-Saharan Africa. Sustainability, 13, Article 4483.  
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084483</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAOSTAT (2021) Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations Statistical Database; Statistical Division. FAO, Rome.  
http://www.fao.org/statistics/en/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gupta, P.P. (1985) Plant Regeneration and Variabilities from Tissue Cultures of Cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium and X. violaceum). Plant Cell Reports Journal, 4, 88-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269214</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Calle, J., Gasparre, N., Benavent-Gil, Y. and Rosell, C.M. (2021) Aroids as Underexplored Tubers with Potential Health Benefits. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research, 97, 319-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.afnr.2021.02.018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sefa-Dedeh, S. and Kofi-Agyir, S.E. (2002) Starch Structure and Some Properties of Cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium and Colocassia esculenta) Starch and Raphides. Food Chemistry, 79, 435-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00194-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Opara, L.U. (2003) Edible Aroids: Post-Harvest Operations. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ukpong, I.J., Abasiekong, B.O. and Etuk, B.A. (2014) Phytochemical Screening and Mineral Elements Composition of Xanthosoma sagittifolium Inflorescence. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences and Research, 4, 32-35.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngwan, M.E., Djeuani, A.C., Boudjeko, T. and Omokolo, N.D. (2019) Different Flavonoid Profiles in Xanthosoma sagittifolium L. Schott Leaves (White and Red CV) during Growth under the Influence of Poultry Manure and NPK Fertilizers. International Journal of Science and Research Methodology Human, 13, 101-117.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Djeuani, A.C. (2018) Les champignons mycorhiziens à arbuscules et la minitubérisation chez Xanthosoma sagittifolium L. Schott: Evolution de quelques paramètres biochimiques au cours de ce processus. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Yaoundé 1, Yaoundé.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Djeuani, A.C., Mbouobda, H.D., Nzie, O., Ngo&amp;#239;, J.K. and Niemenak, N. (2021) Use of Oyster Shell Ash of Crassostrea spp. in Mass Production of Sanitized Seedlings of Colocasia esculenta L. Schott by the PIF Method and Influence of Some Fertilizers during Their Growth in Acclimation. Open Access Library Journal, 8, 1-15.  
https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1108008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amama, A.B. (2022) Production des plants assainis chez Xanthosoma sagittifolium (L.) Schott à partir de la méthode de PIF. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Yaoundé 1, Yaoundé.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Djeuani</surname><given-names> A.C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Mbouobda</surname><given-names> H.D.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Wadawa</surname><given-names> J.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Ngonkeu</surname><given-names> M.E.L.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Metopa</surname><given-names> T.J.D.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Sob</surname><given-names> N.I. and Niemenak N. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2023</year>)<article-title>Mycorrhization of Three Colocasia esculenta L. Schott Cultivars Grown in Cameroon and Evaluation of Their Effect on Resistance to Mildew Caused by Phytophthora colocasiae</article-title><source> Australian Journal of Crop Science</source><volume> 17</volume>,<fpage> 919</fpage>-<lpage>928</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tiki, A.M.K. (2023) Analyse des paramètres agronomiques et biochimiques au cours de la production des plantes de Xanthosoma sagittifolium L. Schott par la méthode de PIF: Utilisation des activateurs de croissance. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Yaoundé 1, Yaoundé.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Champion, J. (1963) ‘Le bananier’. Man&amp;#339;uvre et Kose, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Calvet, G. and Villemin, P. (1986) Interprétation des analyses de terre. SCPA, Singapore.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beernaert, F. and Bitondo, D. (1992) Sample and Practical Methods to Evaluate Analytical Data of Soil Profiles. Belgian Cooperation University of Dschang, Dschang.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duprarque, A. and Rigalle, P. (2011) Composition des Matières organques et turn over; R&amp;#244;les et fonctions des MO. In actes du colloque &amp;#171;Gestion de l’état organique des sols&amp;#187;, 27 janvier 2011, Agrotransfert.  
http://www.agro-transfert-rt.org/publications/colloques/colloque-gestion-etat-organique-des-sols/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Trouvelot, A., Kough, J.L. and Gianazzi-Pearson, V. (1986) Mesure du taux de mycorhization VA d’un système radiculaire. Recherche de méthodes d’estimation ayant une signification fonctionnelle. In: Gianazzi-Pearson, V. and Gianazzi, S., Eds., Physiological and Genetical Aspects of Mycorrhizae, INRA, Paris, 217-221.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gerdemann, J.W. and Nicolson, T.H. (1963) Spores of Mycorrhizal Endogene Species Extracted from Oil by Wet-Sieving and Decanting, Transaction of the British Mycological Society, 46, 235-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(63)80079-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schenck, N.C. and Pérez, Y. (1987) Manual for the Identification of VA Mycorrhizal Fungi. University of Florida, Gainesville.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">INVAM (2023) International Culture Collection of VA Mycorrhizal Fungi.  
https://invam.ku.edu/spores</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Redecker, D., Schü&amp;#223;ler, A., Stockinger, H., Stürmer, S.L., Morton, J.B. and Walker, C. (2013) An Evidence-Based Consensus for the Classification of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (Glomeromycota). Mycorrhiza, 23, 515-531.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-013-0486-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shannon, C.E. and Weaver, W. (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ortiz, A. and Sansinenea, E. (2021) Recent Advancements for Microorganisms and Their Natural Compounds Useful in Agriculture. Journal of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 105, 891-897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-11030-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xu, F., Vaziriyeganeh, M. and Zwiazek, J.J. (2020) Effects of pH and Mineral Nutrition on Growth and Physiological Responses of Trembling Aspen (Populus tremuloides), Jack Pine (Pinus banksiana), and White Spruce (Picea glauca) Seedlings in Sand Culture. Plants, 9, Article 682. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9060682</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Neina, D. (2019) The Role of Soil pH in Plant Nutrition and Soil Remediation. Journal of Applied and Environmental Soil Sciences, 2019, Article ID: 5794869.  
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5794869</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anonymous (2014) Le macabo ou taro (Laurent Page). 
 https://renseigner.com/plantes/legumes/tubercules/macabo</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boakye, A.A., Wireko-Manu, F.D., Oduro, I., Ellis, W.O., Gudjónsdóttir, M. and Chronakis, I.S. (2018) Utilizing Cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium) for Food and Nutrition Security: A Review. Food Science and Nutrition, 6, 703-713.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.602</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lopez, R. (1995) Resource Degradation, Community Controls, and Agricultural Productivity in Tropical Areas. University of Maryland, College Park.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aguegia, F.D.A., Mboua, J.C., Mouen, M., Ndzana, X., Tchuango, M. and Zok, S. (2000) Les plantes à racines et à tubercules en Afrique: Une contribution au developpement des technologies de récolte et après récolte. GTZ, Bonn.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yerima, K.P.D., Tsufac, R.A., Awazi, P.N. and Enang, K.R. (2020) Contribution of Soil Macro-Fauna to Soil Fertility Improvement in Cacao-Based (Theobroma cacao) Agroforestry Systems in Littoral Region of Cameroon: Examining Cacao Farmers’ Indigenous Knowledge. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 17, 522-531.  
https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2020.15394</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fotso, B. (2016) Evaluation de l’efficacité de souches endogènes de champignons mycorhiziens à arbuscules dans la résistance du bananier plantain (Musa sp. Musaceae) au stress hydrique en C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire. Ph.D. or Master’s Thesis, Université de Yaoundé 1, Yaoundé.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N’Dayegamiye, A., Marcel, G. and Gasser, O.M. (2007) La contribution en azote du sol reliée à la minéralisation de la MO: Facteur climatique et régies agricoles influen&amp;#231;ant les taux de minéralisation d’azote. Colloque sur l’Azote.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boyer, J.S. (1982) Plant Productivity and Environment. Science, 218, 443-448.  
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.218.4571.443</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Bationo, A., Mugbogho, S.K. and Mokwunye, A.U. (1986) Agronomic Evaluation of Phosphate Fertilizers in Tropical Africa. In: Mokwunye, A.U. and Vleck, P.L.G., Eds., Management of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizers in Sub-Saharan Africa, Springer, Dordrecht, 283-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4398-8_10</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chaima, N. (2016) Impact de la fertilisation potassique sur le lessivage du potassium sous culture de pomme de terre (Solanum tuberosum). Ph.D. Thesis, Université Laval, Laval.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mankoussou, M., Mialoundama, F. and Diamouangana, J. (2017) Influence du potassium dans la production du ma&amp;#239;s (Zea mays L. variété Espoir) dans la vallée du Niari (Congo). Biosciences, 111, 10882-10893. https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v111i1.5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dauber, J., Niechoj, R., Baltruschat, H. and Wolters, V. (2008) Soil Engineering Ants Increase Grass-Root Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Colonization. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 44, 791-796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-008-0283-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Blanchard, E. and Jouquet, P. (2017) Chapitre 23: Role des vers de terre et des termites pour la restauration de la productivité des sols en milieu tropicaux. In: Restauration de la productivité des sols tropicaux et méditerranéens: Contribution à l’agroécologie, IRD Editions, Marseille, 303-314.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Temegne, N.C., Wakem, G.A., Taffouo, V.D., Mbogne, T.J., Onguene, A.N., Youmbi, E. and Ntsomboh-Ntsefong, G. (2017) Effect of Phosphorus Fertilization on Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in the Bambara Groundnut Rhizosphere. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 11, 1399-1410.  
https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR2017.8680</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Touré, G.P.T., Nandjui, J., Koné, A.W., Kouadjo, A.G.Z., Ebou, A., Tiho, S. and Zézé, A. (2021) Diversité des champignons mycorhiziens a arbuscules et interactions avec le système sol-litière dans une écotone foret-savane; cote d’ivoire. Etude et Gestion des sols, 28, 93-104.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sreevani, A. and Reddy, B.N. (2004) Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Associated with Tomato (Lycopersicom esculentum Mill.) as Influenced by Soil Physico-Chemical Properties. Philippine Journal of Science, 133, 115-129.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Graves, J.D., Watkins, N.K., Fitter, A.H., Robinson, D. and Scrimgeour, C. (1997) Intraspecific Transfer of Carbon between Plants Linked by a Common Mycorrhizal Network. Plant and Soil, 192, 153-159. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004257812555</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Johnson, J.M., Houngnandan, P., Kane, A., Sanon, K. and Neyra, M. (2013) Diversity Patterns of Indigenous Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Associated with Rhizosphere of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) in Benin, West Africa. Pedobiologia, 56, 121-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2013.03.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngonkeu, M.E.L. (2009) Tolérance de certaines variétés de ma&amp;#239;s aux sols à toxicité aluminique et manganique du sud Cameroun et diversités moléculaire et fonctionnelle des mycorhizes à arbuscules. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Yaoundé I, Yaoundé.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131869-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramza, I.H., Koulagna, H.I., Said, A.A., Kosma, P. and Megueni, C. (2020) Diversity of Arbuscular mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) Associated with Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Growing in the Far-North Region of Cameroon. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 14, 211-224.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>