Baringo is one of the 47 counties in Kenya. It is situated in the Rift Valley region. Baringo covers an area of 11,015.3 km² of which 165 km² is covered by surface water from Lake Baringo, Lake Bogoria, and Lake Kamnarok [6] . Lake Bogoria is the deepest alkaline lake in Kenya with numerous alkaline hot springs that contribute significant inflows into the lake. The Lake Bogoria National Reserve which is 107 km² comprises of the lake and the terrestrial portion with various vegetation types depending on soil types and terrain. Lake Bogoria National Game Reserve, lies between 36˚4' and 36˚7' East and 0˚20' North and about 10 km North of the equator in Baringo County (Figure 1). It has an altitude of between 970 m a.s.l at the lake to 1650 m a.s.l on Siracho escarpment. The Reserve lies close to the eastern wall of the Great Rift Valley and has its headquarters at Loboi Gate. Lake Bogoria drainage basin has three major soil types; clay soil, clay loam and silt loam. The climate in the plains is arid to semi-arid regimes except in the moist highlands around Subukia. Temperatures around the Lake range from 18˚C to 39˚C with a daily mean of 25˚C. Mean annual precipitation varies from 500 - 1000 mm and falls in two seasons April-May and October-November [6] [9] . According to the population and housing census conducted in 2019, the population of Baringo County was 666,763 showing positive trend [17] . There are six broad vegetation types in the Reserve: riverine forests, wooded bush land, bushed thicket, bush land, bushed grassland and swamps [10] .

The area is rich in wildlife species characterized by a high diversity at low

densities. Animals found in the plains of LBNGR include the Greater Kudu, impala, vervet monkey, dikdik, warthog, and common jackal, among others. There are several reptiles that include monitor lizard, lizards, tortoise, crocodiles and various species of snakes, and over 373 species of birds [6] .

Field studies to assess spatio-temporal change of dispersal of biodiversity are expensive, time consuming and need to be carried out over many years. However, they have some limitations because of the complexity of interactions and difficulty of generalizing the results. For this study, secondary data for two years was used to supplement primary data collected during the study period. Spatial distribution and dispersal areas of the Kudu were assessed using primary and secondary data of Kudu population count in a Geographic Information System (GIS).

The transect lines had been established in the year 2019 by Friends of Nature Bogoria (a regional wildlife conservation organization) with the aim to have Greater Kudu population counts across the year over different seasons although regular monitoring has been hampered by limited resources—hence census is carried out once every year during the dry season. Secondary data that had been collected by LBNGR since the year 2019 and data collected during the study period (2022) were used to assess the abundance, distribution and trends of Kudu population for the last four (4) years.

The distances of the identified Greater Kudus from the already laid out transect lines were recorded and their geographic positions captured using GPS. During the study period, data was collected during the dry season (December to March) a similar period when the secondary data was collected. For temporal analysis, secondary data from LBNR for years 2019 and 2020 for similar seasons (dry) were compared with the primary data. The data for the year 2021 was missing due to travel and activity restrictions associated with Covid-19 pandemic.

The data collected of Greater Kudu population counts in the year 2022 was used to calculate the average density (number/km²) in a GIS. This data was supplemented by Greater Kudu population secondary data acquired from LBNGR for year 2019 and 2020. The presence of Greater Kudus in a location was digitized as points using GIS software. The measures of dispersion and densities were then applied to the Greater Kudu population to show spatial spread within their range. Further, GIS density-based point pattern analysis (PPA) was used to characterize Greater Kudu distribution in the study area.

Based on transect line counts, the population of Greater Kudu (numbers) from 2019 to 2022 in the Lake Bogoria landscape is presented in Figure 2.

The population increase of Greater Kudu in the year 2022 is attributed to improved conservation campaigns and support by the conservation partners. This

has empowered the community to protect Kudus even when they stray to their farms because they know the benefit of its conservation. On the other hand, there was a decrease in Greater Kudus numbers in 2020. This decline was ascribed to above normal rainfall received in the study area. This may have affected breeding cycle of the Kudus which usually begins at the end of a rainy season or survival rate of the juveniles affected, and/or triggered herbivore migration [18] . Both et al. (2006), indicated that rainfall distribution determines onset of seasons which in turn affect biodiversity at the species level on timing of events like migration, dispersal and breeding habits populations [19] . Other studies have also shown that where there are plenty of food resources with minimum fluctuations between the years as is the case in the study area, the increase in rainfall may suppress Greater Kudu population growth [18] .

The spatial distributions of sighted Kudus for the 3 years are presented in maps showing age and sex structured Greater Kudu population for the three years. According to [20] , for the first two weeks after birth, Kudu calf hides where predators cannot find them. It was evident from this study that most of the calves stayed away from the rest of the group since they were still young to move around with the mother (Figure 3, Figure 4). It was also noted that Kudus were generally concentrated around the Lake. This observation was consistent with the findings of Simpson (1972) that Kudus concentrated around water points during annual dry season [21] . Thus, the sustainability of the Lake Bogoria is vital for the survival of the Greater Kudu. It is also an indication that there could be limited watering points in the landscape.

Comparing the three years, most Kudus were counted in the dense vegetation located more than 5km away from the Lake in 2019 (Figure 5). These numbers appear to have decreased over the years such that by the year 2022 (Figure 3), most Kudus occupied areas not far from the Lake. This implies that their terrestrial habitat could be facing disturbances from socio-economic activities as was also observed by Aduma et al. (2018) that human activities like agriculture and

settlements interfere with migration or dispersal of wildlife [16] .

Point Pattern Analysis showed that for the year 2019, Greater Kudu dispersal map had a high density of between 10 and 40 Kudus/km² on the rangelands around Maji Moto and Koitumet wards (Figure 6). The depressed rainfall for all the seasons in 2019 contributed to this population pattern. Being shy, the Kudus numbers ranging between 1 and 10 Kudus/km² were sparsely spread on the western side of the Lake in the agricultural lands of Molos and Kamar wards. This may lead to Greater Kudu population instability and possibly local extinction due to increase in human-wildlife conflicts. Greater Kudu prefers to inhabit wood and thick bush land, mixed scrub woodland, mopane bush on lowlands, hills and mountains and anywhere with a constant supply of water [22] [23] .

Greater Kudu dispersal map for the year 2020 (Figure 7) shows a high density of between 10 and 40 Kudus/km² in the leafy vegetation located in Maji Ndege and Chibirebei wards. This could be due to above normal rainfall for all the three seasons of the year (2020) in the landscape; most Kudus met their water needs elsewhere other than the Lake. The Kudus were densely populated in vegetated areas. Socio-economic activities tend to reduce the Greater Kudu population spread as was evidenced by low numbers ranging between 1 and 10/km² on the western side of the Lake in the agricultural lands of Koitumet and Kamar wards.

The dispersal map for year 2022 shows dense population of Greater Kudus (ranging between 40 and 50/km²) near the shores of the Lake Bogoria in Koitumet sub-ward (Figure 8). More Kudus were also observed in Chibirebei and Maji Ndege wards in the highly vegetated areas around the Lake. Marginal numbers of Kudus ranging from 1 to 10/km² were seen in Tinosiek Olkokwe and Kamar wards, respectively which further affirms the importance of water sources/watering on dispersal of Greater Kudus [14] [21] .

The ecosystem of the study area is characterized by agricultural lands (crop farming), wetlands, rangelands, grasslands, acacia forest/shrubland, water bodies, shrines, salt lick areas, conservancies, grazing areas, lodges and settlement areas. It is noteworthy that among factors that threaten Greater Kudu existence in the study area are poaching, human population creates pressure on land, scarcity of potable water hence limited watering points for Greater Kudus, habitat/corridors destruction due to agricultural activities, pests and diseases (Greater Kudus tend to be infested with ticks), extreme temperature and rainfall fluctuations, culture/indigenous knowledge erosion, encroachment to conservation areas and lack of ecosystem conservation awareness.

From the findings, it was evident that ecological needs of Greater Kudu affected their dispersal for instance; water requirements as was indicated by high concentration of Kudus around the Lake shores in the year 2019 when rains were depressed; food as the case for high concentration of Kudus in Chebirebei

ward in 2020; breeding behavior as is shown by dispersal of Kudu calves mostly being away from the mature herds; and their seasonal movement patterns or home range. This agrees with what Bennett (2003) indicated as factors to be considered when establishing and managing wildlife corridors [24] .

For adaptive management of Greater Kudu and improved community livelihoods, sustainability is fundamental. Indigenous knowledge informing taboos and culture where only the most mature horn of Kudu is used in sacred rituals should be documented and preserved. Other activities like apiculture, smart agriculture (optimize land production to curb agricultural land expansion), establishment of monitoring transect lines and equitable revenue sharing for bursaries will promote Greater Kudu adaptive management and provide alternative revenue source for the community hence improved livelihoods.

Sustainable conservation of Greater Kudu calls for deliberate efforts by relevant stakeholders to increase in Greater Kudu watering points; identification, mapping and preservation of Greater Kudu corridors to minimize human-wildlife conflicts; pasture production to substitute natural forage for Greater Kudus; pest and disease management to be mainstreamed with Greater Kudu conservation to minimize their spread of ticks ad associated diseases to livestock; revenue sharing policy to be reviewed to ensure more resources generated from tourism is ploughed back for Greater Kudu conservation; regular Kudu census/monitoring; awareness creation through sensitizations and expansion of community conservancies; and beneficiaries of greater Kudu revenue bursaries to organize CSR activities towards adaptive management in the landscape.