<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ABB</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8456</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/abb.2024.153013</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ABB-131787</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Production of Yam Tubers Using Seed Tubers from Vitroplants Regenerated from Aerial Stems in the Yam Species &lt;i&gt;Dioscorea alata&lt;/i&gt; (L.) and &lt;i&gt;Dioscorea cayenensis-rotundata&lt;/i&gt; (L. &amp; P.) in C&#244;te d’Ivoire
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Koffi</surname><given-names>Honoré Kouamé</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kouakou</surname><given-names>Marius Konan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kouadio</surname><given-names>Ignace Kouassi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kouablan</surname><given-names>Edmond Koffi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Assanvo</surname><given-names>Simon-Pierre N’Guetta</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Plant Production Research Unit, Department of Natural Sciences, University Nangui Abrogoua, Abidjan, C&amp;amp;#244;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of des Science and Technology, University Alassane Ouattara of Bouaké, Bouaké, C&amp;amp;#244;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Genetics Laboratory of Bioscience Research Unit, University Félix Houphou&amp;amp;#235;t Boigny (UFHB), Abidjan, C&amp;amp;#244;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Central Biotechnology Laboratory, National Center for Agronomic Research (NCAR), Abidjan, C&amp;amp;#244;te d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>14</day><month>03</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>184</fpage><lpage>194</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>4,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2024</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>18,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The aim of this study is to produce large quantities of yam tubers in the field from seed tubers derived from vitroplants regenerated from aerial stem cuttings and farmers’ tuber seeds. Seed tubers from ten yam cultivars, including five from 
  Dioscorea alata (cDa083, cDa053, cDa115, cDa150 and cDa266) and five from 
  Dioscorea cayenensis-rotundata (cDr015, cDr027, cDr150, cDr206 and cDr148) with distinct agro-morphological characteristics, were used as material. A completely randomized block design with 3 replications was used. In each block, all cultivars and seed types were represented. When put into cultivation, the tubers produced by the vitroplants all germinated and gave 100% healthy plants, compared with 86% to 100% healthy plants for the seed tubers produced by the farmers. Yields per hectare ranged from 10 to 25 tonnes for seed tubers produced by 
  in vitro plants, and from 4 to 9 tons for seed tubers produced by farmers. Seed tubers from vitroplants can therefore be recommended to farmers as a solution to the problem of seed tuber unavailability.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Yams</kwd><kwd> Vitroplants</kwd><kwd> Seed Tubers</kwd><kwd> Yields</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Yam (Dioscorea spp.) is one of the most important food crops in the tropics. It is consumed by thousands of people living in tropical and subtropical regions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131787-ref1">1</xref>] . West and Central Africa constitute the so-called yam belt, accounting for 96% of the world’s cultivated area and supplying 95% of global production, estimated at 71 million tonnes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131787-ref2">2</xref>] . Nigeria is the world’s leading producer, supplying 71.5% of global production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131787-ref2">2</xref>] . With 7853083.92 tonnes, C&#244;te d’Ivoire ranks 3rd worldwide after Ghana [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131787-ref3">3</xref>] . Not only do yams provide important carbohydrates, proteins and vitamins for human consumption, they are also significant sources of income [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131787-ref4">4</xref>] . They also play a decisive role in the socio-cultural relations of many traditional populations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131787-ref5">5</xref>] . The main species cultivated in C&#244;te d’Ivoire are Dioscorea alata and the Dioscorea cayenensis-rotundata complex [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131787-ref6">6</xref>] . The Dioscorea alata species (60% of production) is mainly destined for family consumption, while Dioscorea cayenensis-rotundata (40%) is preferably marketed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131787-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131787-ref8">8</xref>] . Annual yam production exceeds 200 kg per capita, making it C&#244;te d’Ivoire’s leading food crop [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131787-ref9">9</xref>] . Despite this, annual production is still insufficient to meet the food needs of C&#244;te d’Ivoire’s fast-growing population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131787-ref10">10</xref>] . This is because seed requirements considerably reduce the quantity of tubers intended for consumption. In fact, more than 1/3 of the tubers produced for consumption are used as planting material. As a result, after the creation of new yam plantations, the unavailability of edible tubers has led to famine among farmers.</p><p>To solve this problem, several tuber-seed production techniques have been developed, notably vegetative propagation of yam by in vitro culture. This technique offers many advantages and has made it possible to find plant material other than tubers for seed production.</p><p>The aim of this study is to evaluate the tuber yield and health status of yams produced in the field from seed tubers derived from vitro plants regenerated from the aerial stems of several yam species.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Site</title><p>The trials were carried out at the Centre National de Recherche Agronomique (CNRA) located in Abidjan at Km 17 in Adiopodoum&#233;. The geographical coordinates of the center are between 5˚7'N latitude and 3˚31'W longitude. The climate is equatorial. Temperatures vary between 27˚C and 35˚C on average. Annual rainfall is 2000 mm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131787-ref11">11</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Plant Material</title><p>The plant material consisted of seed tubers from vitroplants and seed tubers of ten cultivars belonging to two yam species. Five cultivars (cDa083 or Florido; cDa053 or C18; cDa115; cDa150 and cDa266 or Kanga-nza) belonged to the Dioscorea alata species, and the other five cultivars (cDr015 or C20; cDr027 or Krengl&#232;; cDr150 or Krengl&#232; doko tangbi; cDr206 or Kponan and cDr148 or Lokpa) belong to the Dioscorea cayenensis-rotundata species. These cultivars are the most widely grown and consumed by farmers. Cultivars C18 and C20 are improved varieties. In D. alata, cultivars cDa083, cDa115 and cDa150 belong to the Nza variety, while cultivars cDa053 and cDa266 are of the B&#232;t&#232;-b&#232;t&#232; variety. With regard to D. cayenensis-rotundata, cultivars cDr015, cDr027 and cDr150 are late yams harvested once, while cultivars cDr206 and cDr148 are early yams harvested twice a year. All cultivars have different agro-morphological characteristics that distinguish them from one another. Tubers from these cultivars used for greenhouse stem production come from the research station of the Centre National de Recherche Agronomique (CNRA) in Bouak&#233;.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Methods</title><sec id="s2_3_1"><title>2.3.1. Experimental Design</title><p>Trials were conducted in a randomized complete block design with three replicates. In each block, 10 tubers produced by plants grown from vitroplants of each cultivar and 10 traditional seeds of each cultivar (tubers produced by plants grown from germinated seed tubers) were grown on field mounds. Tubers were harvested 9 to 10 months after planting. Trials were carried out over two growing seasons.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_2"><title>2.3.2. Agronomic Yield Variables Evaluated</title><p>Agronomic yield variables were taken from each yam plant. Growth variables included plant height and number of tillers produced per plant, mean number of tubers per plant.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Data Analysis</title><p>A multivariate variance analysis (MVA) was performed with R software, version 4.1.2. The AMOVAs were supplemented by ANOVA tests when interactions were significant. When a significant difference was observed between the different factors, Least Significant Difference (LSD) multiple range-tests procedure were used to separate the means of the different treatments. Means were given as mean followed by standard deviation (M &#177; SD). Significant differences were determined at P ≤ 0.05 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131787-ref12">12</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Results</title><sec id="s3_1_1"><title>3.1.1. Sprouting Rate of Seed Tubers Produced by in Vitro Plants and by Plants Derived from the Sprouting of Tuber Fragments</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows the germination rates of tuber-seeds from the in vitro plants and those of plants derived from germinating tuber fragments. For all cultivars, all tuber seeds from in vitro plants germinated. In contrast, the germination rate of tuber-seeds from plants derived from tuber fragment germination varied from 86.66% to 100%. In D. alata cultivars, this rate varied from 90% to 100%, while in D. cayenensis-rotundata cultivars, it varied from 86.66% to 100%.</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_2"><title>3.1.2. Anthracnose Infection Rate of Seedlings of Different Yam Varieties</title><p>For both yam species, D. alata and D. cayenensis-rotundata, seedlings derived from germination of seed tubers produced by the in vitro plants of all cultivars were free of symptoms of anthracnose caused by the plant-parasitic fungus Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The rate of healthy plants was 100%. However, plants of some cultivars of D. cayenensis-rotundata derived from sprouted seed tubers produced by plants obtained from tuber fragments were affected by anthracnose. Thus, the rate of healthy plants ranged from 86.66 to 100%. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the appearance of leaves of anthracnose-affected [Figures 1(A)-(C) (1)] and disease-free [<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(C) (2)] plants. Affected leaves show brown necrotic spots surrounded by yellow rings. D. alata cultivars were not affected even when their stems and those of diseased D. cayenensis-rotundata cultivars were carried by the same stake [<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(C) (2)].</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Germination rate in % of seed tubers of different yam varieties</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Types of seeds</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="10"  >Yams varieties</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa 083</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa 053</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa 115</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa 150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa 266</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr 015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr 027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr 150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr 206</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr 148</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Seed tubers of vitro plants</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Seed tubers of plants from fragment of tubers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.66</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Cultuvars of Dioscorea alata (cDa083 or Florido; cDa053 or C18: improved variety, cDa115: Nza variety, cDa150: Nza variety, cDa266 or Kanga-nza). Cultivars Dioscorea cayenensis-rotundata (cDr015 or C20: improved variety, cDr027 or Krengl&#232;; cDr150 or Krengl&#232; doko tangbi; cDr206 or Kponan, cDr148 or Lokpa).</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Rate of healthy seedlings in % from germination of seed tubers of different yam varieties</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Types of plants</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="10"  >Yams varieties</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa 083</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa 053</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa 115</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa 150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa 266</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr 015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr 027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr 150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr 206</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr 148</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plants resulting from the germination of tuber seedlings of vitroplants</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plants obtained from the germination of tuber-seeds of plants obtained from tuber fragments</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Cultuvars of Dioscorea alata (cDa083 or Florido; cDa053 or C18: improved variety, cDa115: Nza variety, cDa150: Nza variety, cDa266 or Kanga-nza). Cultivars Dioscorea cayenensis-rotundata (cDr015 or C20: improved variety, cDr027 or Krengl&#232;; cDr150 or Krengl&#232; doko tangbi; cDr206 or Kponan, cDr148 or Lokpa).</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_3"><title>3.1.3. Yield of Yam Varieties in the Field According to the Type of Seed from Which the Plants Are Derived</title><p>On average for the cultivars of both yam species, there was no significant difference in the number of tubers produced per plant between seed tuber sprouted plants produced by in vitro plants and plants sprouted from tuber fragments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). However, the values of total tuber mass per plant (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>), average tuber mass (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>) and yield per hectare (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>) of the plants derived from sprouted seed tubers produced by the in vitro plants are significantly higher than those of the plants derived from sprouted tuber fragments. These mean data are similar to the results obtained in the overall analysis (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows the difference in size of tubers produced by plants germinated from seed tubers from in vitro plants and plants germinated from tuber fragments. Tubers produced by seed tuber sprouted plants from in vitro plants are generally larger and bigger than those produced by tuber fragment sprouted plants.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Mean number of tubers produced by seedlings of yam varieties in the field according to the type of seed from which they are derived</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Yams cultivars</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Seeds of vitroplants</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Tuber seeds</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Fisher Test</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa053</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00 &#177; 0.00<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00 &#177; 0.00<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2166</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa083</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.40 &#177; 0.60<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3 &#177; 0.57<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4345</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa115</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.60 &#177; 0.68<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.45 &#177; 0.60<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2587</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.75 &#177; 0.55<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.60 &#177; 0.50<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4823</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa266</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.20 &#177; 0.41<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.25 &#177; 0.44<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3278</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15 &#177; 0.37<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05 &#177; 0.22<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0873</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.60 &#177; 0.88<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.40 &#177; 0.68<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0208</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr148</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.30 &#177; 0.47<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.20 &#177; 0.41<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6665</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15 &#177; 0.37<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00 &#177; 0.00<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3431</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr206</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00 &#177; 0.00<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00 &#177; 0.00<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8876</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Values followed by the same superscript in a line were not significantly different P ≥ 0.05. Cultuvars of Dioscorea alata (cDa083 or Florido; cDa053 or C18: improved variety, cDa115: Nza variety, cDa150: Nza variety, cDa266 or Kanga-nza). Cultivars Dioscorea cayenensis-rotundata (cDr015 or C20: improved variety, cDr027 or Krengl&#232;; cDr150 or Krengl&#232; doko tangbi; cDr206 or Kponan, cDr148 or Lokpa).</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Total weights (in kg) of tubers produced by seedlings of yam varieties in the field according to the type of seed from which they were obtained</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Yams cultivars</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Seeds of vitroplants</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Tuber seeds</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Fisher Test</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa053</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.40 &#177; 0.82<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05 &#177; 0.37<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa083</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.33 &#177; 0.47<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59 &#177; 0.33<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa115</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.25 &#177; 1.83<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.94 &#177; 0.53<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.19 &#177; 1.65<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.24 &#177; 0.60<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa266</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.61 &#177; 0.81<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05 &#177; 0.55<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.25 &#177; 0.74<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.22 &#177; 0.40<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50 &#177; 0.62<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.86 &#177; 0.57<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr148</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.32 &#177; 0.47<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80 &#177; 0.46<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.73 &#177; 0.58<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.86 &#177; 0.41<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr206</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43 &#177; 0.22<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22 &#177; 0.14<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2915</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Values followed by the same superscript in a line were not significantly different P ≥ 0.05. Cultuvars of Dioscorea alata (cDa083 or Florido; cDa053 or C18: improved variety, cDa115: Nza variety, cDa150: Nza variety, cDa266 or Kanga-nza). Cultivars Dioscorea cayenensis-rotundata (cDr015 or C20: improved variety, cDr027 or Krengl&#232;; cDr150 or Krengl&#232; doko tangbi; cDr206 or Kponan, cDr148 or Lokpa).</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Average tuber weights produced by yam varieties in the field according to the type of seed from which the plants were derived</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Yams cultivars</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Seeds of vitroplants</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Tuber seeds</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Fisher Test</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa053</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.40 &#177; 0.82<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05 &#177; 0.37<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa083</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05 &#177; 0.46<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48 &#177; 0.23<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa115</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.38 &#177; 0.71<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71 &#177; 0.42<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.03 &#177; 1.14<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83 &#177; 0.44<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa266</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31 &#177; 0.39<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.85 &#177; 0.33<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.03 &#177; 0.55<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.18 &#177; 0.41<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00 &#177; 0.24<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62 &#177; 0.32<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr148</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03 &#177; 0.26<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65 &#177; 0.26<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.54 &#177; 0.43<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88 &#177; 0.41<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr206</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43 &#177; 0.22<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22 &#177; 0.14<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.211</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Values followed by the same superscript in a line were not significantly different P ≥ 0.05. Cultuvars of Dioscorea alata (cDa083 or Florido; cDa053 or C18: improved variety, cDa115: Nza variety, cDa150: Nza variety, cDa266 or Kanga-nza). Cultivars Dioscorea cayenensis-rotundata (cDr015 or C20: improved variety, cDr027 or Krengl&#232;; cDr150 or Krengl&#232; doko tangbi; cDr206 or Kponan, cDr148 or Lokpa).</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Average yields per hectare (in tons) of yam varieties in the field by seed type</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Yams cultivars</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Seeds of vitroplants</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Tuber seeds</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Fisher Test</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa053</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.20 &#177; 7.14<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.40 &#177; 2.94<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >118.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa083</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.64 &#177; 3.75<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.72 &#177; 2.62<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa115</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.00 &#177; 1.46<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.78 &#177; 4.21<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.52 &#177; 1.32<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.88 &#177; 4.89<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >145.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDa266</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.88 &#177; 6.51<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.36 &#177; 4.41<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.16 &#177; 5.95<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.76 &#177; 3.18<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.96 &#177; 4.75<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.88 &#177; 4.53<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr148</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.56 &#177; 3.79<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.40 &#177; 3.68<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.84 &#177; 4.62<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.04 &#177; 3.27<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cDr206</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.44 &#177; 1.78<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.76 &#177; 1.08<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Values followed by the same superscript in a line were not significantly different P ≥ 0.05. Cultuvars of Dioscorea alata (cDa083 or Florido; cDa053 or C18: improved variety, cDa115: Nza variety, cDa150: Nza variety, cDa266 or Kanga-nza). Cultivars Dioscorea cayenensis-rotundata (cDr015 or C20: improved variety, cDr027 or Krengl&#232;; cDr150 or Krengl&#232; doko tangbi; cDr206 or Kponan, cDr148 or Lokpa).</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Yield variables values of yam seedlings in the field by seed type</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Yield variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Seeds of vitroplants</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Seed tubers</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Fisher test</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean number of tubers per plant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31 &#177; 00<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.22 &#177; 00<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.110</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total mass of tubers per plant (kg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.88 &#177; 1.05<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88 &#177; 0.33<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean mass of a tuber (kg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.42 &#177; 0.46<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75 &#177; 0.27<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yield per hectare (tone)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.71 &#177; 3.79<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.06 &#177; 4.13<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Values followed by the same superscript in a line were not significantly different P ≥ 0.05.</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_4"><title>3.1.4. Yield Variables of Germinated Seed Tubers Produced by in Vitro Plants of Different Yam Cultivars in the Field</title><p>The values of the yield variables of the germinated seed tubers produced by the in vitro plants are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>. For all yield variables, there are very highly significant differences between cultivars. For D. alata, the mean number of tubers per plant ranged from 1.00 in cultivar cDa053 to 1.75 in cultivar cDa150. For D. cayenensis-rotundata, the mean number of tubers per plant ranged from 1.00 in cultivar cDr206 to 1.6 in cultivar cDr027. Cultivar cDa150 had the highest total tuber mass per plant (3.185 kg per plant) while cultivar cDr206 had the lowest tuber mass (0.43 kg per plant). The average mass of a tuber ranged from 1.05 kg to 2.40 kg in D. alata and from 0.43 kg to 2.03 kg in D. cayenensis-rotundata. The highest average mass, 2.40 kg and the lowest 0.43 kg were obtained in cultivars cDa053 and cDr206 respectively. Yield per hectare ranged from 25.52 tons/hectare for cultivar cDa150 to 3.44 tons/hectare for cultivar cDr206.</p><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of plant yield variables of different yam cultivars in the field</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Yams cultivars</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean number of tubers per plant</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total mass of tubers per plant (kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean mass of a tuber (kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Yield per hectare (tons)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >cDa053</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.39<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.40<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.20<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >cDa083</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.40<sup>abc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.33<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.64<sup>d</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >cDa115</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.60<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.25<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.38<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.00<sup>bc</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >cDa150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.75<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.18<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.03<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.52<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >cDa266</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.20<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.61<sup>bcd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.88<sup>bcd</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >cDr015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.27<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.03<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.16<sup>bc</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >cDr027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.60<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.49<sup>cd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.06<sup>cd</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >cDr148</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.30<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.56<sup>d</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >cDr150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.73<sup>bcd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.54<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.84<sup>bcd</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >cDr206</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.44<sup>e</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Fisher Test</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Values followed by the same superscript in a column were not significantly different P ≥ 0.05. Cultuvars of Dioscorea alata (cDa083 or Florido; cDa053 or C18: improved variety, cDa115: Nza variety, cDa150: Nza variety, cDa266 or Kanga-nza). Cultivars Dioscorea cayenensis-rotundata (cDr015 or C20: improved variety, cDr027 or Krengl&#232;; cDr150 or Krengl&#232; doko tangbi; cDr206 or Kponan, cDr148 or Lokpa).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Discussion</title><p>The aim of this study was to produce yam tubers in the field using seed tubers from vitroplants regenerated from aerial stem. The results showed that the seeds produced by plants germinated from in vitro plant seed tubers outperformed those produced by plants germinated from seed tubers. In fact, the germination test showed that the seeds produced by plants germinated from tuber-seed in vitro plants all germinated. Analyses also showed that these seed tuber plants from vitroplants were healthy, as diseases caused by fungi such as anthracnose and rots, nematodes, viruses (Yam Mosaic Virus (YMV) and Internal Brown Spot (IBS) were not observed on these plants. The absence of disease in seed tubers grown from in vitro plants could explain the 100% germination rate obtained with these seed tubers. The elimination of these diseases is thought to be due to the cultivars being grown in vitro. The results obtained are similar to those of Ng [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131787-ref13">13</xref>] , who obtained 300 clones free of yam mosaic virus through in vitro culture. The same applies to the results of Saleil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131787-ref14">14</xref>] , who succeeded in ridding affected plants of YMV by in vitro cultivation of the apexes of contaminated nodal cuttings.</p><p>Regarding the average number of tubers per plant, the results showed that there was no difference between the number of tubers produced by the two types of seed, whatever the yam cultivar. As for the average mass of a tuber per plant, the results showed that the average masses of seed tubers from vitroplants were higher than those from germinated seed tubers, with the exception of cultuvars cDr206, whose average masses were statistically identical for both types of seed. Similarly, tables showing the average tuber mass per plant and the yield of fresh yam tubers per hectare showed statistically different results depending on the type of seed used. The average tuber mass per plant and yield of fresh yam tubers for plants germinated from tuber seeds produced by in vitro plants was more than double that of seeds produced from plants germinated from tuber seeds. These results could be explained by the fact that the disinfection achieved by in vitro cultivation improved the performance and vigour of the seeds produced by the vitroplants, and consequently increased production. Similar results were observed by Yao [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131787-ref15">15</xref>] . Indeed, after treating yam seedlings with aqueous extracts plus adjuvant, the author recorded the best yields. This adjuvant improved the efficacy of the aqueous extracts against yam anthracnose. As the yam plants do not show any symptoms of anthracnose, biological functions such as absorption of water and mineral elements by the roots, photosynthesis, and transport and storage of the products of photosynthesis, can be carried out correctly. The nutrient reserves regularly produced by these yam plants during photosynthesis would gradually accumulate in the tubers, boosting production.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The work carried out has made it possible to produce yam tubers in the field from seed tubers derived from votroplants of two yam species. The production of seed tubers in the field from cultivars of the two yam species, D. alata and D. cayenensis-rotundata, has been improved by the use of seeds preserved in the form of vitroplants. Tubers produced by in vitro plants are of very high quality, not only because they are healthy and resistant to the main yam diseases, but also because they produce highly productive plants with a very good yield per hectare, unlike tubers produced by plants grown directly from germinating seed tubers. Thus, the production of seed tubers by in vitro cultivation is far better than that achieved by the traditional method of growing plants directly from the germination of tuber fragments. In vitro cultivation makes it possible to obtain the healthy seeds needed for high yam profitability and to safeguard all genetic resources by conserving them in the form of in vitro plants. It is therefore possible to solve the thorny problem of seed unavailability and satisfy farmers by supplying them with thousands of tons of tubers.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Kouam&#233;, K.H., Konan, K.M., Kouassi, K.I., Koffi, K.E. and N’Guetta, A.S.-P. (2024) Production of Yam Tubers Using Seed Tubers from Vitroplants Regenerated from Aerial Stems in the Yam Species Dioscorea alata (L.) and Dioscorea cayenensis-rotundata (L. &amp; P.) in C&#244;te d’Ivoire. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology, 15, 184-194. https://doi.org/10.4236/abb.2024.153013</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.131787-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Coursey, D.G. (1976) Yams, Dioscorea spp. (Dioscoreaceae). In: Simonds, N.W., Ed., Evolution of Crops Plants, Longma, London, 70-74.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131787-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAO (2020) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistics Division. http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/Q/QC/E</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131787-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAO (2021) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistics Division. Land Use. FAO, Rome. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/RL</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131787-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Babaleye, T. (2003) An Important Success Story of the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) Which Has Existed in Nigeria since Its Inception 36 Years Ago Is That of Raising the Status of the Yam, a Major Food Crop in West Africa. ANB-BIA Nigeria, 1-3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131787-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Degras, L. (1993) The Yam: A Tropical Root Crop. The Macmillan Press, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131787-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Doumbia, S., Tshiunza, M., Tollens, E. and Stessens, J. (2004) Rapid Spread of the Florid Yam Variety (Dioscorea alata) in Ivory Coast: Introduced for the Wrong Reasons and Still a Success. Agriculture, 33, 49-54.  
https://doi.org/10.5367/000000004322877773</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131787-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">IITA (1995) Yam Research. In: Crop Improvement Division, Root and Tuber Improvement Program, IITA, Ibadan, 39 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131787-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stessens, J. (2002) Analyse technique et économique des systèmes de production agricole au nord de la c&amp;#244;te d’ivoire. Thèse de Doctorat, Faculté des Sciences Biologiques Appliquées, Université de Leuven, Belgique.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131787-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAO (2008) Food and Agricultural Organization Statistics Database.  
http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/Desktopdefault.aspx</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131787-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Odunfa, A. (1990) Typologie et stabilité de comportement alimentaire: Une approche par le transfert élargi en C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire. Thèse de 3ème cycle, Université Paris X, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131787-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Toualy, M.N.Y. (2017) Caractérisation et cartographie des virus infectant l’igname (Dioscorea spp.; Dioscoreaceae) et le manioc (Manihot esculenta Crantz; Euphorbiaceae) en C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire. Thèse de doctorat unique, Université Nangui Abrogoua, Abidjan.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131787-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dagnelie, P. (1998) Statistical Theory and Methods. 2nd Edition, Presse agronomique de Gembloux, Gembloux.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131787-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ng, S.Y.C. (1988) In Vitro Tuberization in White Yam (Dioscorea rotundata Poir). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 14, 121-128.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00041185</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131787-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saleil, V., Degras, L., Jonard, R., Hamard, P., Quétin, P. and Bal, P. (1990) Obtention des plantes indemnes du virus de la mosa&amp;#239;que de l’igname (YMV) par la culture in vitro des apex chez l’igname américaine Dioscorea trifida L. Agronomy, 10, 605-615. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:19900801</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131787-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yao, K.F. (2019) épidémiologie et lutte contre l’anthracnose de l’igname (Dioscorea spp.) en C&amp;#244;te d’Ivoire. Thèse de doctorat unique, Université Nangui Abrogoua. Ufr Sciences de la nature, Abidjan.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>