<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Surgical Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-9407</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ss.2024.152005</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">SS-131375</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Study of Hemorrhoid Disease in the Department of General Surgery of the Cs Ref of the Commune I Bamako
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tounkara</surname><given-names>Cheickna</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Diarra</surname><given-names>Issaka</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sanogo</surname><given-names>Modibo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Togola</surname><given-names>Modibo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Camara</surname><given-names>Ladji Soma</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dembele</surname><given-names>Bakary Tientigui</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Traore</surname><given-names>Alhassane</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Togo</surname><given-names>Adégné Pierre</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kante</surname><given-names>Lassana</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ouattara</surname><given-names>Zanafon</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Diallo</surname><given-names>Gangaly</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of General Surgery, The Reference Health Center in Commune I, Bamako, Mali</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of General Surgery, The Gabriel Toure University Hospital, Bamako, Mali</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Urology, The Gabriel Toure University Hospital, Bamako, Mali</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>02</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>36</fpage><lpage>47</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>18,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>27,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This work was a retrospective prospective study carried out in the general surgery department of the Cs ref of commune I from January 2009 to December 2012. Our study aimed to determine the hospital frequency of hemorrhoidal disease, to identify the contributing factors, describe the clinical and therapeutic aspects and analyze the surgical consequences. We collected 73 patients with an average age of 37.8 years (range: 19 years and 77 years) with a sex ratio of 2.5 in favor of men. We operated on 49 patients or 67.1% of cases. 71.2% of our patients were married and lived in Bamako. Schoolchildren and middle managers made up 39.8% of cases. 82.2% of patients were seen in ordinary consultation and 69.9% complained of progressive anal pain in 66.7% of cases. This pain was triggered by defecation in 88.2% of our patients. The contributing factors were dominated by constipation (53.4%), working in a seated position (41.1%) and a sedentary lifestyle (16.4%) of cases. Stage IV external hemorrhoids and hemorrhoidal thrombosis represented 53.8% of surgical indications. The most used surgical technique was that of Milligan-Morgan, i.e. 51.9% of cases and 45.2% of patients treated medically received a combination of transit regulator, venotonics and analgesics. The surgical aftermath was marked by hemorrhage (3 cases), delayed healing (5 cases), urinary retention (1 case) and scarring anal stenosis (1 case). The morbidity rate was 5.48% of cases and a zero mortality rate. The average length of hospitalization was 2 days with extremes of 1 and 5 days.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Hemorrhoid</kwd><kwd> Surgery</kwd><kwd> Cs Ref C I</kwd><kwd> Bamako</kwd><kwd> Mali</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Hemorrhoids from the Greek “Hemorrhoids” are ectasias of the capillaries of the corpus cavernosum recti [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref1">1</xref>] . Hemorrhoidal disease appears to be the most common terminal intestinal pathology but remains difficult to assess [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>In the USA, Hyams and Philpot found a prevalence of 27% of the population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>In France, its prevalence is 25% of the adult population and a hospital frequency of 6 to 18% among HIV patients in 2001 according to the French national society of colo-proctology [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>In Australia, 4 to 34% of the general population according to the Australian National Institute in 2003 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>In the Central African Republic, 58.8% of all Ano-rectal pathologies in 2004 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>In Ivory Coast, 30.5% of lesions observed during colonoscopy in 2006 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>In Mali, 10.7% of outpatient consultations in surgery department “B” at Point G hospital in 2003 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref8">8</xref>] ; 40.15% of lower endoscopies and 6.35% of consultations in the Gastroenterology department of the Gabriel Tour&#233; University Hospital in 1993 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>Hemorrhoidal disease exists physiologically in humans and becomes pathological with the appearance of clinical manifestations, the main ones of which are anal pain, rectal bleeding, and hemorrhoidal prolapse. It is considered by the population as a shameful disease, responsible for school and professional absenteeism, aesthetic discomfort, but with little to no mortality. The contributing factors are multiple and varied, but all have in common the increase, with the most common being constipation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>The confirmatory diagnosis is made by Ano rectoscopy. Complications are thrombosis and hemorrhage. Treatment is medical, instrumental and surgical. The main postoperative complications are anal stenosis, anal incontinence, hemorrhage, acute urinary retention and pain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>Several studies carried out on hemorrhoidal disease in our hospitals have shown a certain mastery of surgical management [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>Our health structure constitutes the first level of patient referral according to the health pyramid in Mali. Hemorrhoidal disease is considered a shameful disease generally treated by traditional therapists or self-medication, factors favoring complications. The frequency was high during our ordinary consultations and surgical emergencies during on-call. No study has been carried out on hemorrhoidal disease in our Cs Ref in Bamako despite the decentralization of skills in the field of surgery. This is why we carried out this work to better understand the management of this proctological pathology at the level of the reference health center of the comme I of the district of Bamako in Mali.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Research Methodology</title><p>This work was carried out in the Reference Health Center of Commune I of the District of Bamako which has a general surgery department. This was a retro-prospective cross-sectional study spanning from January 2009 to December 2012. We collected 73 cases of hemorrhoidal disease. We carried out a systematic recruitment of all patients.</p><p>&#183; Inclusion criteria: Any patient admitted for hemorrhoidal disease, treated and followed in the general surgery department.</p><p>&#183; Non-inclusion criteria: Any patient admitted for other proctological pathologies and/or hemorrhoidal disease not treated and followed in the department.</p><p>The variables studied were sociodemographic (age, sex, profession, residence); physical examination (general, functional, physical signs); additional examinations (systematic rectoscopy except in cases of hemorrhoidal thrombosis); emergency biological assessment (Hemoglobin level, Hematocrit, Rhesus group, TP, TCK, Blood sugar) and surgical treatment: techniques (Milligan Morgan and Thrombectomy) and short and medium term operative consequences.</p><p>Two main techniques were used in our work: hemorrhoidectomy according to Milligan Morgan and simple thrombectomy in cases of hemorrhoidal thrombosis.</p><p>The supports used were the patients’ medical files, the outpatient consultation and hospitalization registers, recording the patients’ reports, the individual investigation sheet and the anesthesia protocol.</p><p>Data entry and analysis were carried out on SPSS version 19.</p><p>The Student’s statistical comparison tests and the Chi square were calculated on Epi info 6.4 with p &lt; 0.05.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>In four years we have carried out 5210 consultations, an average of 1302 consultations per year; 992 surgical interventions or 248 interventions on average per year and 1070 hospitalizations. Hemorrhoidal disease: 1.4% of consultations; 5.2% of interventions and 4.9% of hospitalizations.</p><p>The average age was 37.8 years (extreme 19 years and 77 years) with a sex ratio of 2.5 (52/21) in favor of the male sex (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The reasons for consultation were anal pain, hemorrhoidal prolapse and rectal bleeding, 82% of patients were seen in ordinary consultation and 18% in emergency (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Pain was present in 71.2%, rectal bleeding 23.3% and hemorrhoidal prolapse 56.2%. The pain was moderate without radiation (45.1%), burning (47.1%), intermittent (74.5%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The prolapse was progressive (90.9%), irreducible (63.6%). Comorbidities were hypertension (2.7%), diabetes (5.5%) and sickle cell disease (1.4%).</p><p>Surgical history was hemorrhoidectomy (2.7%). The general condition was maintained in all our patients.</p><p>The contributing factors were constipation (53.4%), diarrhea (15.1%), prostate adenoma (10.9%), sedentary lifestyle (16.4%), working in a sitting position (41.1%), pregnancy (4.1%).</p><p>Inspection of the anal verge found hemorrhoidal prolapse in 47.9% of our patients, hemorrhoidal marisques (19.2%), anal ulceration (1.4%), fistulous orifices (2.7%). and anal fissures (11%). Rectal examination was done in 82.2% of patients, 17.8% not possible due to pain and hemorrhage (1.7%). The anal sphincter</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Sociodemographic data</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Sociodemographic data</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 - 45 years old</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >46 - 60 years old</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Over 60 years old</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Feminine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Marital status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bride)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bachelor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Widower</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Divorced</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="10"  >Occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Senior</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Middle management</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lower frame</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >School</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Peasant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Household</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Military</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Worker</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trader</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Others</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >Origin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kayes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Koulikoro</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sikasso</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Segou</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Timbuktu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kidal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bamako</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Others</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The age group of 19 - 45 years was the most represented, i.e. 49.30% of cases (65% of our patients were under 50 years old). The average age was 37.8 years; the extremes of 19 years and 77 years. The sex ratio was 2.5 with the predominance of males. Married people represented 71.20% of our patients and 71.20% resided in Bamako. Schoolchildren and middle managers made up 39.80% of our patients.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according to recruitment method and work position</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Method of recruitment/Position of work</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Method of recruitment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Emergency</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ordinary consultation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Work position</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Standing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Seated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Standing seated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>82.20% of our patients were seen in ordinary consultation and the sitting position constituted 40.10% of cases.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Characteristics of pain</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Pain characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Installation mode</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Brutal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Progressive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Period of onset of pain in relation to defecation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >During bowel movements</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >After bowel movements</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Outside of the stool</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >During and after bowel movements</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Type of pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Burn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gravity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sting</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tension</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Pain intensity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weak</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strong</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Extreme</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Pain irradiation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Local</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Perineal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Local + Perineal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Local + Pelvic + Perineal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Evolution of pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Permed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intermittent</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>66.70% of pain set in gradually. Anal pain occurred during defecation in 49% of cases. 41.10% of anal pain was burning. 45.10% of anal pain had moderate intensity and radiated locally. Anal pain was intermittent in 74.50% of cases.</p><p>was hypertonic in 53.4% of cases. Internal hemorrhoidal ridges were associated in 65% of cases. Rectal examination was painful in 11.7% and hemorrhagic in 1.7% of cases.</p><p>The diagnostic hypotheses retained: internal hemorrhoids (42.5%), thrombosis (17.8%), hemorrhoid + fissure (11%), hemorrhoid + fistula (2.7%) and internal + external hemorrhoid (6.8%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><p>Our patients benefited from ano-rectoscopy in 82.2% including 2 (2.7%) biopsies. The diagnosis made by anotoscopy was: internal hemorrhoids stage I (5.5%), stage II (6.8%), III (12.3%), IV (20.6%), external hemorrhoids (20.6%), thrombosis (17.8%), internal external hemorrhoids (5.5%), fistula hemorrhoid (2.7%) and fissure hemorrhoid (8.2%).</p><p>45.2% of patients were treated medically with transit regulator, venotonics and analgesics for two weeks in 42.9% of cases (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p><p>Our patients, 52 (71.2%) were operated on, 75% with Karnofsky index of 80%; 86.5% under spinal anesthesia; stage IV external hemorrhoids and thrombosis (53.8%) surgical indications; the Milligan-Morgan technique in 51.9% of operated patients. 96.2% of our operated patients received antibiotic therapy, a mild laxative, an analgesic and an antiseptic in a sitz bath and manual dilation on day 10 in all our operated patients (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>).</p><p>Our operated patients did not present any immediate postoperative complications in 90.4% of cases. The consequences were simple in 92.3% of cases; delayed healing (5.8%) and anal stenosis (1.9%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Characteristics of rectal bleeding</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Characteristics of rectal bleeding</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Recectorgia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Time of occurrence of rectal bleeding</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >During bowel movements</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >After bowel movements</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Outside of the stool</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >During and after bowel movements</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Quantity of rectal bleeding</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Traces</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Drops</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Appearance of rectal bleeding</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Red</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Black</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clot</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Rectory bleeding was observed in 23.30% of patients. Rectory bleeding occurred during bowel movements in 70.50% of cases. 64.70% of the rectal bleedings occurred in the form of traces and 76.50% of the rectal bleedings were made of red blood.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Characteristics of prolapse and accompanying signs</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Hemorrhoidal prolapse and accompanying signs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Hemorrhoidal prolapse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Mode of appearance of prolapse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Brutal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Progressive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Reduction of prolapse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spontaneous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Manual</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Irreducible</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Duration of hemorrhoidal prolapse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Less than 24 hours</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 to 2 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 days to 1 week</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >More than a week</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >Accompanying signs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oozing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Peri-anal irritation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anal pruritus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Epreinte</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tenesmus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oozing + Pruritus + Tenesmus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oozing +Peri-anal irritation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>60.30% of patients presented with hemorrhoidal prolapse. The mode of appearance of the prolapse was progressive in 90.90% of cases. The prolapse was irreducible in 63.60% of cases. 52.30% of prolapses had been evolving for more than a week. Anal oozing was present in 32.90% of cases.</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Surgical treatment</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Surgical treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Surgical treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Operated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not operated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Karnofsky index</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >80%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >70%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Type of anesthesia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spinal anesthesia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Epidural anesthesia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >General anaesthesia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Surgical indications</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Failure of medical treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hemorrhoidal thrombosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >External hemorrhoid stage III</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >External hemorrhoid stage IV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hemorrhoid + Fissure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hemorrhoid + Fistula</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Surgical techniques</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Milligan-Morgan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Simple thrombectomy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hemorrhoidectomy + Fissurectomy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hemorrhoidectomy + Fistulectomy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>71.20% of our patients were operated on. 75% of our patients had a Karnofsky index of 80%. 86.50% of patients were operated on under spinal anesthesia. Stage IV external hemorrhoids and hemorrhoidal thrombosis represented 53.80% of surgical indications. The Milligan-Morgan technique was performed in 51.90 patients.</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution according to post-operative complications</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Postoperative complications</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Immediate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hemorrhage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acute urine retention</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Late</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single suites</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Delayed healing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anal stenosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>90.40% of operated patients had no immediate post-operative complications. 92.30% of operated patients reported no complications after 4 months of follow-up.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>We conducted a retrospective study spanning 4 years and involving 73 patients. We worked with a questionnaire relating to patients suffering from hemorrhoidal disease in addition to data collection supports. However, we encountered a number of problems:</p><p>&#183; The difficulty in collecting data from old files because many files were incomplete.</p><p>&#183; Delay in treatment due to traditional treatment.</p><p>&#183; Some patients lost to follow-up and unreachable by telephone.</p><p>Hemorrhoidal disease is a frequent reason for consultation but certain factors influence its prevalence such as modesty, lack of necessary information for patients, traditional treatment and self-medication.</p><p>It includes internal and external hemorrhoids, hemorrhoidal thrombosis which are among the pathologies most frequently encountered in proctology [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref3">3</xref>] , [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref5">5</xref>] . During our work, hemorrhoidal disease constituted 1.4% of consultations, an average of 18 cases per year. This frequency does not differ from those of Bougouma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref7">7</xref>] , (p = 0.2429) and Dicko ML [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref11">11</xref>] , (p = 0.6822) and lower than that of Yassim Banda [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref6">6</xref>] (p = 0. 0000), explained by the size of the samples. Appearing at all ages, our average age (37.8) years corroborates with the results of African series [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref14">14</xref>] , differs from data in Western literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref16">16</xref>] ; our patients were relatively younger, in Africa in particular.</p><p>Sex is not a risk factor, Picot [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref17">17</xref>] , (1.1%); Al-hadrani [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref18">18</xref>] , (3.69%); NG KH et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref2">2</xref>] , (1.4%) and Dicko ML [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref11">11</xref>] , (2.95%) all had a predominance of men as in our series (sex ratio = 2.47); factors found, greater consumption of stimulants (alcohol, coffee, tobacco), strength work and intense sports (bicycle, motorcycle, dumbbells). The risk factors have a common denominator, the increase in abdominal pressure slowing blood reflux into the upper rectal vein [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref9">9</xref>] , such as constipation, smoking, chronic alcoholism, certain sports [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref19">19</xref>] . Its frequency varies between 27.6% and 54% depending on the authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref20">20</xref>] .</p><p>Anal pain was the main symptom, its frequency (69.9%) in our series does not differ from those of Dicko ML (p = 0.3331) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref11">11</xref>] and Picot (p = 0.2229) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref17">17</xref>] .; higher than that of Pravin (p = 0.0561) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref19">19</xref>] linked to the living conditions of the patients. Rectory bleeding (23.3%) differs from other series (p = 0.0000) through recruitment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref19">19</xref>] . Pruritus and oozing, secondary to hemorrhoidal prolapse [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref4">4</xref>] ; 17.8% of our patients corroborate those of other authors (p = 0.8860) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref17">17</xref>] ; (p = 0.4902) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref19">19</xref>] ; p = 0.7303) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>Rectal examination, a key moment, establishes the diagnosis of hemorrhoidal disease (sphincter hypertonia) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref4">4</xref>] ; 40.6% in our series, poorly evaluated due to lack of pressure gauge. Patients always consulted at advanced stages (stage III + IV); 32.9% in our study compared to more than half of the patients at ROSA in Italy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref2">2</xref>] and at Dicko ML in Mali [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref11">11</xref>] , (p = 0.000).</p><p>The hemorrhoidal pathology respects the vascular anatomy of the anal verge (3 branches of the superior rectal artery; 3 o’clock, 7 o’clock and 11 o’clock). The site of the hemorrhoidal clusters, 60.3% in our series were located at 3 o’clock, 7 o’clock and 11 o’clock [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><p>Classic medical treatment was reserved for stages I and II [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref4">4</xref>] , using a transit regulator; affected 42 (57.5%) of our patients. Venotonics, anti-inflammatories and oral analgesics remain useful. The Milligan and Morgan technique (67.1%) of our patients and 64% of Dicko M.L. was commonly used without complications after six months of follow-up [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref8">8</xref>] ; the Longo technique by many other authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref24">24</xref>] .</p><p>Immediate postoperative complications were dominated by urinary retention, 1 (2%) ranged from 2 to 13.2% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref26">26</xref>] ; influenced by a perfusion volume greater than 1 liter, an age between 40 and 50 years, the performance of an intraductal pressure dressing, a multipedicular hemorrhoidectomy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref8">8</xref>] and hemorrhage (1.9%), between 0 at 4.9% according to the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref27">27</xref>] .</p><p>Late postoperative outcomes (delayed healing = 5.8%) differ from the African (8.2%; p = 0.0000) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref14">14</xref>] and Indian (2%; p = 0.0030) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref28">28</xref>] series; linked to (quality of local care, non-regularization of transit or medical history) and late hemorrhage, none in our series and in those of other authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref29">29</xref>] was 6% at Pravin in India [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref9">9</xref>] , due to the operating technique and the quality of hemostasis during the operation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>Scar stenosis (1.9%) differs from Pravin (p = 0.0852); de Pressaux (p = 0.003) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref29">29</xref>] and zero in the Kouadio series [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref14">14</xref>] . No anal incontinence among several authors was 10.4% among Pravin in India [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131375-ref28">28</xref>] ; following injury to the anal sphincter during the procedure.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Hemorrhoidal disease is the most common anorectal disease with a predilection in young adults. The epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic aspects of this pathology are diverse and varied. Its definitive diagnosis is based on ano-rectoscopy. The main concern must first be the elimination of rectal cancer because most patients with hemorrhoidal disease consult at a late stage.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Cheickna, T., Issaka, D., Modibo, S., Modibo, T., Soma, C.L., Tientigui, D.B., Alhassane, T., Pierre, T.A., Lassana, K., Zanafon, O. and Gangaly, D. (2024) Study of Hemorrhoid Disease in the Department of General Surgery of the Cs Ref of the Commune I Bamako. Surgical Science, 15, 36-47. https://doi.org/10.4236/ss.2024.152005</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.131375-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mihigan, B.J., Monson, J.R.T. and Hartley, J.E. (2000) Stapling Procedure for Haemoohoids versus Milligan-Morgan Haemorrhoidectomy: Randomised Control Trial. Lancet, 355, 782-785. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(99)08362-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ng, K.H., Ho, K.S., Ool, B.S., De Saveur, C.L. and Kilowatt, E. (2006) Experience of 3711 Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy Operations. British Journal of Surgery, 93, 226-230. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5214</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hyams, L. and Philpot, J. (1970) An Epidemiological Investigation of Hemorroids. American Journal of Proctology, 21, 177-193.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laurent, A., Philippe, G., Staumont, G. and Soudan, D. (2001) Recommandation pour la pratique clinique sur le traitement de la maladie h&amp;#233morro&amp;#239daire. Gastroent&amp;#233rologie Clinique et Biologique, 25, 674-702.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Godeberge</surname><given-names> P. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2006</year>)<article-title>La maladie h&amp;#233morro&amp;#239daire</article-title><source> Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association</source><volume> 145</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>4</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yassimbanda, S., Ignaleamoko, A., MBelesso, P., Bobossi, G.S., Boua, N., Camego-Police, S.M., Wabolou, P., Nali, N. and Vohito, M.D. (2004) La pathologie anorectale &amp;#224 Bangui en r&amp;#233publique centrafricaine (RCA). Mali Medical, 19, 12-14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bougouma, A., Drabo, Y.J., Serme, A.K., Zoungrana, S.L., Somblie, A.R., Ilboudo, P.D. and Bonkoungou, P. (2002) Statistiques hospitali&amp;#232res: Analyse des r&amp;#233sultats de 1221 coloscopies en milieu hospitalier au Burkina Faso, 1994-1997. Bulletin de la Soci&amp;#233t&amp;#233 de Pathologie Exotique, 95, 50-52.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diallo, G., Sissoko, F., Ma&amp;#239ga, I., et al. (2003) La maladie h&amp;#233morro&amp;#239daire dans le service de chirurgie &amp;#171B&amp;#187 de l’h&amp;#244pital du Point G.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Couloubaly, A. (2003) H&amp;#233morro&amp;#239de et sexualit&amp;#233 au service de chirurgie g&amp;#233n&amp;#233rale et p&amp;#233diatrique du CHU Gabriel TOURE. Th&amp;#232se de M&amp;#233decine, Bamako.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dembele, K. (1993) Aspects &amp;#233pid&amp;#233miologiques et cliniques des maladies h&amp;#233morro&amp;#239daires au Mali. Th&amp;#232se de M&amp;#233decine, Bamako.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dicko, M.L. (2006) Etude des h&amp;#233morro&amp;#239des au CHU de Gabriel Tour&amp;#233. Th&amp;#232se de M&amp;#233decine, Bamako.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Coulibaly, H. (2008) Prise en charge chirurgicale des h&amp;#233morro&amp;#239des dans le service de chirurgie &amp;#171A&amp;#187 au CHU du Point G. Th&amp;#232se de M&amp;#233decine, Bamako.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elen, J., Okiemy, G., Chocolat, R., et al. (2007) R&amp;#233sultats du traitement chirurgical de la maladie h&amp;#233morro&amp;#239daire selon la technique de Milligan-Morgan &amp;#224 propos de 56 cas CHU Brazzaville (Congo). Chir, 2, 58-60.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kouadio, G.K., Kouao, J.A., Kouadio, L.N. and Turquin, H.T. (2004) Exp&amp;#233rience de l’h&amp;#233morro&amp;#239dectomie selon Milligan-Morgan en C&amp;#244te D’Ivoire, Abidjan. M&amp;#233decine d’Afrique Noire, 51, 385-388.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chew, S.S., Marshall, L., Tham, J., Grieve, D.A., Douglas, P.R. and Newstead, G.L. (2003) Short-Term and Long-Term Results of Combined Sclerotherapy and Rubber Band Ligation of Haemorrhoids and Mucosal Prolapsed. Diseases of the Colon &amp; Rectum, 46, 1232-1237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6720-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dewit, O., Melanger, M. and Vanheuverzwyn, R. (2001) Les urgences en proctologie. Louvain M&amp;#233dical, 120, 43-49.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Picot</surname><given-names> F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2001</year>)<article-title>H&amp;#233morro&amp;#239des et maladie h&amp;#233morro&amp;#239daire</article-title><source> Revue du praticien</source><volume> 51</volume>,<fpage> 21</fpage>-<lpage>25</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Al-Hadrani</surname><given-names> A.M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2002</year>)<article-title>Khat Induced Haemorrhoidal Disease in Yemen</article-title><source> Saudi Medical Journal</source><volume> 21</volume>,<fpage> 475</fpage>-<lpage>577</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pravin, J. and Gupta, M.S. (20005) New Aproch to Advanced Haemorrhoidal Disease. Romanian Journal of Gastroenterology, 14, 361-366.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chan, A.O., Lam, K.F., Hui, W.M., Leung, G., Wong, N.Y., Lam, S.K. and Wong, B.C. (2007) Influence of Positive Family History on Clinical Characteristics of Functional Constipation. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 5, 197-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2006.10.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dewit, O., Melanger, M. and Vanheuverzwyn, R. (2001) Les urgences en proctologie. Louvain M&amp;#233dical, 120, 43-49.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Basdanis, G., Papadopoulos, V.N., Michalopoulos, A., Apostolidis, S. and Harlaftis, N. (2005) Randomized Clinical Trial of Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy vs Open with Ligature for Prolapsed Piles. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 19, 235-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-9098-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bikhchandanis, J., Agarwal, P.N., Kant, R. and Malik, V.K. (2005) Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Early and Mid-Term Results of Stapled versus Open Haemorrhoidectomy. The American Journal of Surgery, 189, 56-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.03.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Racalbuto, A., Aliotta, I., Corsaro, G., Lanteri, R., Dicataldo, A. and Licata, A. (2004) Haemorrhoidal Stapler Prolapsectomy vs Milligan-Morgan Haemorrhoidectomy a Long-Term Randomized Trial. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 19, 239-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-003-0547-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Senejoux</surname><given-names> A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2008</year>)<article-title>Chirurgie des h&amp;#233morro&amp;#239des</article-title><source> Quelles suites op&amp;#233ratoires? Annales de Chirurgie</source><volume> 136</volume>,<fpage> 635</fpage>-<lpage>742</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pyy, L., Meng, W.C.S. and Yip, A.W.C. (2004) Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy in Chinese Patients: A Prospective Randomised Control Study. Hong Kong Medical Journal, 10, 373-377.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Touzin, E., Hegge, S. and Mckinley, C. (2005) Early Experience of Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy in a Community Hospital Sitting. Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association, 45, 154-178.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gupta, P.J., Heda, P.S. and Surkha Kalaskar, B.H.M.S. (2006) Radiofrequency Ablation and Placation—A New Technique for Prolapsing Haemorrhoidal Disease. Current Surgery, 63, 44-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cursur.2005.04.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131375-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pessaux, P., Tuech, J.J., Laurent, B., Regenet, N., Lermite, E., Simone, M., Huten, N., De Manzini, N. and Arnaud, J.P. (2004) Complications apr&amp;#232s anopexie circulaire pour cure d’h&amp;#233morro&amp;#239de: R&amp;#233sultat &amp;#224 long terme d’une s&amp;#233rie de 140 malades et analyse de la litt&amp;#233rature. Annales de Chirurgie, 129, 571-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anchir.2004.05.008</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>