Objective: By the end of 2021, the aging rate of China’s population is 18.9%, and the prevalence rate of chronic diseases in the elderly population is increasing year by year, and chronic diseases have become the main causes of death and health threats of Chinese residents. Therefore, how to manage this huge group well is crucial. This paper analyzes the value of health education in the process of health management for patients with chronic diseases. Methods: 102 patients with chronic diseases treated from January 2021 to December 2021 were divided into control group and experimental group by random number table method. The control group was given routine health management while the experimental group was given health education based on the control group, and the implementation effect was analyzed. Results: After management, the scores of chronic disease knowledge in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group, and the dimensions of ESCA were higher than those in the control group, and P < 0.05; Conclusion: The implementation of health education in the process of chronic disease health management is helpful to improve patients’ self-care ability and better control disease progression.
Chronic diseases refer to a general term encompassing various non-communicable illnesses that can accumulate over an extended period and cause damage to the morphology of the disease. Presently, chronic diseases have emerged as the primary health threat, particularly among the elderly population. The most prevalent chronic diseases include hypertension and diabetes [
Sample Size Calculation Formula:
N = Z2 × [ P × ( 1 − P ) ] / E2
In the formula, Z represents the critical value, calculated as 1.96 for a 95% confidence level; E represents the margin of error, calculated as 10%; and P represents the probability, calculated as 0.5. Therefore
N = 19 . 62 × 0. 5 × 0. 5 / ( 0. 12 ) ≈ 96
Hence, the minimum sample size is approximately 96 cases.
After confirming the research sample, participants with chronic illnesses were recruited from my local community between January 2021 and December 2021. The individuals were informed about the significance and objectives of this study, and their consent was obtained. Following their full understanding and agreement to participate, a total of 102 chronic disease patients were successfully enrolled in the research. The application of a random number table was used to divide the participants into a control group and an experimental group, with each group comprising a total of 51 patients.
Inclusion criteria: All patients were diagnosed based on the corresponding diagnostic criteria for the relevant chronic illness, with an age of 60 years or older. They all possessed normal communication and comprehension abilities, clear consciousness, and engaged in daily activities independently. Additionally, all participants were well-informed about the details of the study and voluntarily signed an informed consent form before the commencement of the research.
Exclusion criteria: Patients with severe complications of chronic diseases, language expression disorders, altered consciousness, hearing impairments, and similar conditions were excluded from the study.
All patients received symptomatic treatment based on the diagnosed type of chronic illness. The control group received routine health management, which included informing patients about medication usage and dosage, scheduling regular check-ups, and advising prompt medical attention in case of any physical discomfort. In contrast, the experimental group underwent health education in addition to the routine health management provided to the control group. The implementation steps were as follows:
The group will be composed of 2 to 3 specialized nurses from our cardiology department, ensuring that all members have years of experience in the health management of chronic cardiovascular diseases.
Members of the health education group will gather basic information about patients and establish individual health records. The contents of the records include basic patient information, time of diagnosis, type of chronic illness, names of medication treatments, etc. Based on these records, the health needs of the patients will be assessed to understand their specific health requirements. Upon this assessment, targeted health education methods and content will be determined to address the identified needs.
Common methods of health education include: 1) Face-to-face guidance: Members of the health education group provide health education to patients in an easily understandable manner. 2) Telephone tracking follow-up refers to the practice of periodically (usually once a month) communicating with patients or their family members via phone to inquire about recent dietary habits, lifestyle, any perceived abnormalities in their health, and other related information. 3) Distributing health education materials involves providing patients with information related to chronic illnesses. This type of health education model is typically suitable for patients with reading abilities. 4) Regularly organizing patient participation in health lectures involves bringing together chronic disease patients from the hospital during a specific period. These health lectures feature experts who explain relevant knowledge. Patients are encouraged to raise their questions, fostering an environment for mutual exchange of experiences among the patients. 5) Participating in self-management groups involves organizing recently diagnosed chronic disease patients into smaller groups of 4 to 6 individuals. Each group is led by a patient with strong communication skills and a relatively younger age. Members of the group mutually supervise each other, working together to effectively manage their chronic conditions. It is important to note that the diverse age and educational backgrounds of patients result in varying levels of understanding and cognitive abilities. Therefore, when implementing health education, it is crucial to tailor the approach to the specific circumstances of each patient, choosing the most effective methods. For instance, for older patients with lower educational levels, prioritizing face-to-face guidance and telephone tracking follow-ups as the primary health education methods may be more suitable. For patients with higher educational levels, distributing promotional materials and participating in self-management groups are examples of health education methods that may be more effective.
1) Behavioral guidance involves inquiring about the lifestyle, dietary habits, and exercise routines of individuals with chronic illnesses. Timely identification of any erroneous behaviors is essential, with the goal of guiding patients to cultivate correct awareness and actions. Encouraging patients to rest on time, emphasizing personal hygiene, and tailoring appropriate exercise programs based on the physical condition of chronic illness patients are crucial aspects. For younger patients, activities like swimming and running may be recommended, while for older individuals, options such as the Eight Brocades or Tai Chi can be suggested. Engaging in regular physical activity aims to enhance the body’s immune system and control the progression of chronic illnesses. 2) Psychological guidance is essential for individuals with chronic illnesses, especially elderly patients who often lack understanding of their conditions and may struggle with emotional control skills. The absence of these skills contributes to significant emotional fluctuations, which, in turn, can impact the management of chronic illnesses and affect the prognosis of patients. Therefore, during the medical examination process, it is crucial for the health awareness and care team to emphasize to patients the importance of emotional control. This involves providing detailed information about the connection between emotions and chronic diseases, aiming to prevent the occurrence of easily angered emotions in daily life. Additionally, patients are encouraged to maintain a positive mindset, learn to approach their medical conditions correctly, and reduce the likelihood of negative emotions. 3) Dietary guidance involves making appropriate adjustments to the dietary structure of patients based on their daily eating habits. For individuals with chronic illnesses, dietary goals should focus on the “three regulars, four highs, three lows, and two abstains.” The three regulars refer to regular timing, quality, and quantity of meals. Nutrient-rich foods, particularly those high in protein, vitamins, fiber, and unsaturated fatty acids, should be emphasized. It is important to prioritize low-fat, low-calorie, and low-sodium foods. For individuals with diabetes, reducing the intake of high-sugar foods is also recommended, while those with high cholesterol should avoid animal fats and increase consumption of legumes, vegetables, and fruits. Patients are advised to quit smoking and limit alcohol intake. The primary objective of dietary structure adjustments is to control the progression of the disease, ensuring a balanced and nutritious diet. This helps patients supplement various nutrients and, when combined with medication, aims to control the development of chronic illnesses. 4) Medication health guidance involves informing patients about the importance of taking medications on time and in the prescribed dosage. To ensure that patients accurately understand the correct usage of various medications, community healthcare professionals can have patients repeat the instructions for each type of medication. Timely reinforcement is necessary if any errors are identified. For older patients, it is crucial to leverage the role of family members in supervision to ensure medication adherence. Patients should be informed about the potential adverse reactions of common medications used in the treatment of chronic illnesses. They should be cautioned to be vigilant about any adverse reactions and seek immediate medical attention if any significant side effects are observed. 5) Disease monitoring guidance involves reminding patients to attend follow-up appointments at the hospital on time and adjusting treatment plans based on clinical examination results.
1) Comparing demographic data between two patient groups.
2) Comparing the self-care abilities of two groups of patients before and after management, with evaluation based on the Chinese version of the Self-Care Ability Scale (ESCA). The scale comprises four dimensions: self-care responsibility (6 items), self-concept (8 items), health knowledge (17 items), and self-care skills (12 items), totaling 43 items. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 to 4, with a maximum total score of 172. The scores are positively correlated with the patient’s self-care ability. The results can be categorized into three levels: high, medium, and low. In this study, the Cronbach’s α coefficient for the scale is 0.929 [
The statistical analysis and data interpretation were conducted using the SPSS 25.0 statistical software. The number of cases for patients is denoted by “n”. Count data is presented as percentages, and the chi-square test (χ2) was employed. Continuous data is expressed as means, and the t-test was used. When the p-value is less than 0.05, it indicates a significant difference.
Control Group: There were 28 male and 23 female participants, aged 44 to 88 years (mean age 71.54 ± 5.47 years). The distribution of chronic diseases in this group included 18 cases of hypertension, 18 cases of diabetes, 4 cases of coronary heart disease, 6 cases of hyperlipidemia, and 5 cases of other conditions.
Experimental Group: There were 27 male and 24 female participants, aged 52 to 93 years (mean age 71.50 ± 5.41 years). The distribution of chronic diseases in this group included 17 cases of hypertension, 18 cases of diabetes, 5 cases of coronary heart disease, 6 cases of hyperlipidemia, and 5 cases of other conditions.
Statistical analysis of basic demographic data for the two groups was conducted using data analysis software, yielding a p-value > 0.05, indicating comparability between the groups, as shown in
Before the intervention, there were no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) between the experimental group and the control group in terms of self-care responsibility, self-concept, health knowledge, and self-care skills. After different health education interventions, the experimental group showed higher scores in the dimensions of self-care responsibility, self-concept, health knowledge, and self-care skills compared to before health education, and this difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). However, the control group exhibited no significant differences (P > 0.05) in the scores for self-care responsibility, self-concept, health knowledge, and self-care skills compared to before health education. As shown in
| General information | Experimental group | Control group | X2/t | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 27 | 28 | 0.124 | >0.05 |
| Female | 24 | 23 | |||
| Average age | 71.50 ± 5.41 | 71.54 ± 5.47 | 0.054 | >0.05 | |
| Types of chronic diseases | Hypertension | 17 | 18 | 0.157 | >0.05 |
| Diabetes | 18 | 18 | |||
| Coronary heart disease | 5 | 4 | |||
| Hyperlipidemia | 6 | 6 | |||
| Other | 5 | 5 | |||
| Dimension | Group | Pre-education | Post-education | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sense of self-care responsibility | Experimental group | 10.21 ± 2.36 | 17.83 ± 3.54 | <0.05 |
| Control group | 10.18 ± 2.31 | 10.51 ± 2.42 | >0.05 | |
| Self-concept | Experimental group | 13.11 ± 4.24 | 23.15 ± 4.24 | <0.05 |
| Control group | 13.08 ± 4.21 | 14.07 ± 3.12 | >0.05 | |
| Health knowledge | Experimental group | 30.05 ± 9.15 | 48.04 ± 8.45 | <0.05 |
| Control group | 30.08 ± 9.11 | 31.54 ± 8.78 | >0.05 | |
| Self-care skills | Experimental group | 72.45 ± 15.24 | 121.54 ± 18.24 | <0.05 |
| Control group | 72.41 ± 15.18 | 73.65 ± 16.21 | >0.05 |
From
Chronic diseases, abbreviated as non-communicable diseases, mainly include diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cardiovascular diseases, malignant tumors, and others. Particularly in recent years, with the intensification of the aging trend in society, the incidence of chronic diseases continues to rise, posing a significant threat to public health [
In the preceding text, the effectiveness of implementing health education in the health management process of patients with chronic diseases was analyzed, and a comparison was made with patients undergoing routine health management. The results revealed that after management, the experimental group’s awareness scores regarding chronic disease knowledge were significantly higher than those of the control group, and the ESCA scores were also higher, with a significance level of P < 0.05. This is primarily attributed to the health education model, which, based on an assessment of patients’ conditions and cultural backgrounds, understands their health needs. Subsequently, flexible application of health education methods is employed to conduct disease-related educational activities for patients. This approach helps patients develop a correct understanding of the fundamental knowledge of chronic diseases, acquire basic self-care skills, correct unhealthy lifestyle habits, and reduce the negative impact of these factors on the disease. Ultimately, it facilitates better promotion of disease recovery [
In summary, in recent years, with the continuous intensification of the aging trend in China, the incidence of chronic diseases has been steadily increasing. The occurrence, progression, and control of chronic diseases are significantly associated with patients’ awareness of relevant chronic diseases and their self-care abilities. Implementing targeted health education for patients with chronic diseases has shown remarkable effects in helping patients develop a correct understanding of chronic diseases and enhancing their self-care abilities. This, in turn, contributes to better control of the progression of diseases.
The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Zhong, W. (2024) Observation on the Effect of Health Education in Health Management of Chronic Disease Patients. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 12, 294-302. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2024.122023