<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Water Resource and Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1945-3094</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jwarp.2024.162010</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP-131308</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Purification of Produced Water from a Sour Oilfield in South Kuwait. 1. Oil-Water Separation and Industrial Salt Production
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Feras</surname><given-names>Al Salem</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hessa</surname><given-names>Al Shamsi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mariam</surname><given-names>Mohammed Abdulla Alaryani</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Basmalah</surname><given-names>Abdelazim Mohamed Khalaf</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Omnia</surname><given-names>Elsheikh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Vijo</surname><given-names>Poulose</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yosef</surname><given-names>Al Jasem</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Thies</surname><given-names>Thiemann</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Biology, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Chemistry, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Process &amp;amp; Design Engineering, Solid Mechanical Equipment Co, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>19</day><month>02</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>16</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>156</fpage><lpage>180</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>31,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>21,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>24,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Produced water from an oil extraction site in South Kuwait was sampled after primary oil – water separation had been carried out. The produced water was filtered through a mixture of activated charcoal and esterified cellulosic material gained from spent coffee grounds as a tertiary adsorption treatment. The earth-alkaline metal ions and heavy metals were separated from the de-oiled produced water by addition of either sodium or potassium hydroxide in the presence of carbon dioxide or by direct addition of solid sodium carbonate. The resulting filtrate gave salt of industrial purity upon selective crystallization on evaporation.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Produced Water</kwd><kwd> Oil and Gas</kwd><kwd> Adsorption Filtration</kwd><kwd> Crystallization</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction (Heading 1)</title><p>Oil and gas reservoirs often contain formation water. The formation water in addition to water injected into the wells comes to the surface in the extraction process as produced water (PW). In fact, PW from oil and gas extraction is known to be one of the largest waste-streams originating from human production, amounting to 250 million barrels per day in 2020 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref1">1</xref>] . The global average PW to oil ratio is 7:1, meaning for every barrel of oil 7 barrels of PW are obtained [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref2">2</xref>] . PW has varying concentrations of salts as well as hydrocarbons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref3">3</xref>] . It is highly corrosive, and exposes pipelines and general infrastructure to significant damage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref4">4</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref11">11</xref>] . Also, it is toxic to the environment when released untreated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref14">14</xref>] . On the other hand, PW can be seen as a significant resource of water, salt and lastly of the remaining hydrocarbons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref15">15</xref>] . For many years, also seawater has been seen as a resource for drinking water and for salt, using different types of desalination methods for the first such as multi-stage flash evaporation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref17">17</xref>] and reverse osmosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref18">18</xref>] , and oftentimes undertaking salt collection from salt pans for the latter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref19">19</xref>] .</p><p>Usually, in oil extraction processes, produced water (PW), oil and gas first are segregated by gravity in a three phase separator [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref20">20</xref>] , before further oil separation from the water is carried out by corrugated plate interceptor (cpi) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref21">21</xref>] , hydrocyclone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref22">22</xref>] , and air flotation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref23">23</xref>] . Membrane filtration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref25">25</xref>] or filtration through a sorbent layer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref26">26</xref>] that may include sand [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref27">27</xref>] can be added to the purification scheme, depending on the further use of the PW. As much of the PW is produced in arid regions, research has focused on utilization of treated PW for purpose such as irrigation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref30">30</xref>] . Thus far, this has been met with limited success [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref31">31</xref>] . For the most part, in regions far from the coast and from water bodies in general, treated PW is either disposed of in sub-surface disposal wells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref32">32</xref>] or re-injected into the production well [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref33">33</xref>] to help maintain the pressure of the reservoir.</p><p>Salt has been produced from sea water going back to the Phoenicians in the 9<sup>th</sup> century BC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref35">35</xref>] . In recent times, desalination to procure fresh water has been combined to obtain salt from the reject brine in evaporation ponds, too [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref38">38</xref>] . The average salt content in produced water from oil and gas is 3 - 4 fold of that of seawater. An example of this is the PW used in this study (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)), Looking at the individual metal cations contributing to the salinity, it can be noted that the calcium content of PW is proportionately much higher than that in seawater. In fact, the Ca/Mg ratio found in the PW under investigation was 4.43, while the Ca/Mg ratio in seawater is 0.32 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)). Also, with the ratio Na/K of 23.4, the average contribution of potassium in the investigated PW was slightly higher than in seawater (ratio Na/K of 27.6) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)). These ratios should be kept in mind when contemplating the use of PW as a source of salt. Industrial salt (10 pound brine) requirements stipulate that the salt should be mostly free of the earth-alkaline metals, especially of calcium and strontium as their salts lead to scaling products [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>The focus of this study was to purify produced water (PW) from an oilfield in South Kuwait that had already undergone a primary oil-water separation process. It is a mature field with a water cut of 1:4. Production from 40 - 60 different wells is combined to supply a central processing substation. The total field is comprised of over 1000 wells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref4">4</xref>] . It must be noted that the composition of PW from an oil field can vary, even over short periods of time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref39">39</xref>] . Average compositions of the two PW samples used in this study can be found in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. Graphically, the composition of PW-1 is also shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b). This communication can be seen as the first part of two and deals with the filtration of PW on cellulose esters gained from spent coffee grounds as the final step of the oil-water separation step and with the production of industrial salt (10 pound brine) from the de-oiled PW after a de-calcification step.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Properties and ion content of PW-1, sourced from an oil production in South Kuwait—this PW was treated with SDG-octanoate (see below)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total dissolved solids</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >132,780 ppm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Chloride (Cl<sup>−</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >75,660 pm</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sodium (Na<sup>+</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35,600 ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sulfate ( SO 4 2 − )</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 pm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Potassium (K<sup>+</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1520 ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bicarbonate ( HCO 3 − )</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140 pm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calcium (Ca<sup>2+</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7670 ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silicon (Si)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.3 ppm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Magnesium (Mg<sup>2+</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1730 ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total Iron (Fe)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.36 ppm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Barium (Ba<sup>2+</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3 ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dissolved oxygen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 ppm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strontium (Sr<sup>2+</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >255 ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH at 25˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.88</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Properties and ion content of PW-2, sourced from the same oil production site in South Kuwait 6 months after PW-1—this PW was treated either with SDG-palmitate or with SDG-acetate (see below)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total dissolved solids</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >193,350 ppm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Chloride (Cl<sup>−</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >110,090 pm</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sodium (Na<sup>+</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51,500 ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sulfate ( SO 4 2 − )</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >355 pm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Potassium (K<sup>+</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1800 ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bicarbonate ( HCO 3 − )</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300 pm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calcium (Ca<sup>2+</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11,200 ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silicon (Si)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Magnesium (Mg<sup>2+</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3050 ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total Iron (Fe)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Barium (Ba<sup>2+</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4 ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dissolved oxygen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ND</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strontium (Sr<sup>2+</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >460 ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH at 25˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.02</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. General</title><p>42 L of produced water (PW) samples, 16L of PW-1 and 26L of PW-2, were obtained from an oil extraction operation in South Kuwait. The PW had been submitted to a three-way separator and corrugated plate interceptors. Nevertheless, it still carried appreciable amounts of hydrocarbons. Spent coffee grounds (SCGs) were obtained from a selection of commercially available coffee brands. Pyridine (BDH) was dried over solid KOH and N,N-dimethylacetamide (Sigma Aldrich) was dried over MgSO<sub>4</sub>. Octanoyl chloride (Sigma Aldrich), acetyl chloride (Sigma Aldrich), and palmitoyl chloride (Sigma Aldrich) were used without further purification. Potassium hydroxide (KOH pellets, Sigma Aldrich), sodium hydroxide (NaOH pellets, BDH Analr), anhydrous sodium carbonate (soda, eurolab), activated charcoal (Sigma Aldrich, acid-washed with hydrochloric acid), hexane (Panreac) and dichloromethane (CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub>, Sigma Aldrich) were used as is.</p><p>Torrefaction of SCGs was carried out in a Carbolite oven. Post-reaction, samples were dried in an MMM Ecocell drying cabinet. Reaction mixtures were stirred on WiseStir magnetic stirrers. The ash contents of SCGs, the hydroxide extracted SCGs as well as the SCG-esters were determined by heating respective samples in crucibles (79C-00, Waldenwanger, Berlin) in a Carbolite oven at 600˚C for 3 h, where the mass of the resulting ash is expressed as weight % of the originally weighed-in sample. The initial produced water analysis was carried out at the CORE labs, Abu Dhabi, UAE. The ICP-OES (Inductively Coupled Plasma - Optical Emission spectroscopy) analyses of the salt crystals were carried out by CCIC Middle East FZE – Fujairah Branch. Both laboratories are accredited. For the ICP-OES measurements, an Agilent ICP-OES Model-5110 was used after digestion of the samples with HNO<sub>3</sub> in a microwave digestor. Infrared spectra of the SCG materials, the derived esterified cellulosic materials as well as of the crystallized calcium salts were carried out as KBr pellets with a Perkin Elmer Spectrum 2 FT-IR spectrometer. TOC measurements were performed with a Shimadzu TOC-4200. For the brine surface temperature readings, a Trister<sup>&#174;</sup> infrared thermometer TS-1/T1 was used with an initial calibration utilizing a normal immersion glass thermometer</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Preparation of Cellulosic Sorbent Material from Spent Coffee Grounds</title><sec id="s2_2_1"><title>2.2.1. Pre-Treatment of the Spent Coffee Grounds (CGS)—Obtaining Cellulosic Material from CGS</title><p>For this study, spent coffee grounds were dried by heating them overnight in a Carbolite oven at 100˚C. Thereafter, the SCG were sieved and then heated at 200˚C for 4 h to break bonds within the material and open up the structure of SCG. Thereafter, much of the lignin present in CGS was extracted with an aq. NaOH solution (3 w%, 66˚C, 3 h). For 4 g dried CGS, 3.6 g NaOH were dissolved in 116.4 g water for a 120 g aq. NaOH solution. The extracted CGS material was filtered in vacuo through a sintered glass filter and dried. Most of the extracted material is cellulosic matter. After drying, it was subjected to torrefaction at 200˚C for 2 h. Thereafter, the material was extracted with hot water (60˚C, 2h), filtered and dried once again (200˚C, 2 h). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows the complete process.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_2"><title>2.2.2. Esterification of the CGS-Derived Cellulose</title><p>For palmitate esterification, coffee grounds (extracted with NaOH, non-sieved, 2.0 g, 12.34 mmol, one cellulose units [calcd.]) were added to a 250 mL round bottom flask, and N,N-dimethylacetamide (100 mL) was added. Thereafter, pyridine</p><p>(5.14 g, 65.0 mmol) and palmitoyl chloride (15.0 g, 55.6 mmol) were added dropwise, and the resulting mixture was kept at 66˚C for 4 days. Then, the mixture was cooled to 0˚C, and 300 ml of cold water was added slowly to the solution (to avoid hydrolysis of the formed esters). The ensuing mixture was separated by vacuum filtration through a sintered glass funnel, then washed with dichloromethane (50 mL) and hexane (50 mL), and thereafter dried in the oven for 1 day at 37˚C. (Yield = 1.70 g)</p><p>For octanoate esterification, spent coffee grounds (extracted with NaOH non-sieved, 2 g, 12.3 mmol, cellulose unit [calcd.]) were added to a 250 mL round bottom flask, and N,N-dimethylacetamide (100 mL) was added. Thereafter, pyridine (dried over KOH, 4.18 g, 52.84 mmol) and octanoyl chloride (7.81 g, 48.01 mmol) were added dropwise, and the resulting mixture was kept at 66˚C for 4 days. Then, the mixture was cooled to 0˚C, and 300 ml of cold water was added slowly to the solution (to avoid hydrolysis of the esters). The ensuing mixture was separated by vacuum filtration through a sintered glass funnel, then washed with dichloromethane (50 mL) and hexane (50 mL), and thereafter dried in the oven for 1 day at 37˚C. (Yield = 2.08 g)</p><p>For acetate esterification, coffee grounds (extracted with NaOH non-sieved, 2.0 g, 12.3 mmol, one cellulose unit) were added to a 250 mL round bottom flask, and dimethylacetamide (70 mL) was added. Thereafter, pyridine (5.14 g, 65.0 mmol) and acetyl chloride (3.93 g, 50.0 mmol) were added dropwise, and the resulting mixture was kept at 66˚C for 4 days. Then, the mixture was cooled to 0˚C, and 300 ml of cold water was added slowly to the solution (to avoid hydrolysis of the esters). The ensuing mixture was separated through a sintered glass funnel by vacuum filtration. The filter cake was then washed with dichloromethane (50 mL) and hexane (50 mL), and thereafter dried in the oven for 1 day at 37˚C. (Yield = 3.68 g).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Oil-Water Separation by Adsorptive Filtration on CGS-Esters</title><p>For the adsorptive filtration of PW, two glass columns, A (length, 35 cm, inner diameter 2.25 cm) and B (length 35 cm, inner diameter 1.70 cm) were used. Both columns have an outflow that is controlled with a Teflon<sup>&#174;</sup> stop-cock. In experiment A, column A was filled with a well-mixed sorbent mixture of cellulose octanoate (2.40 g) and activated carbon (7.20 g, 1:3 w/w). In experiment B, column A was filled with a well-mixed sorbent mixture of cellulose acetate (2.40 g) and activated carbon (7.20 g, 1:3 w/w). In experiment C, column B was filled with a well-mixed sorbent mixture of cellulose palmitate (1.20 g) and activated carbon (3.60 g, 1:3 w/w). In all the experiments, sand (30 g) was added as a protective layer on top of the sorptive material. The columns were run with 1 atm pressure, initially at 1L per day (column A) and 500 mL per day (column B), respectively. The de-oiled water was collected in plastic jerry-cans, which thereafter were closed.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Salt Crystallization from De-Oiled PW</title><p>To the de-oiled PW, solid anhydrous sodium carbonate (Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>, 7.0 g per 200 mL de-oiled PW) was added slowly, and the resulting mixture was allowed to stir for 10 min. at rt. The precipitate was filtered off, utilizing a sintered glass filter. The filtrate was evaporated in a two stage process, one outdoors and one indoors. This option was decided upon due to the simplicity of the experimental set-up, where soil temperature as well as solar irradiation contributed to the evaporation of the majority of the water. The last part of the evaporation was carried out under controlled conditions in a drying oven at 37˚C. PW was placed in open plastic containers and set outside. While experiments were performed from July to December 2023, with different temperatures in summer/autumn/winter leading to different evaporation rates, this paper focuses on work carried out in October and November 2023. Daytime temperatures in October ranged from 20˚C to 34.4˚C, in November from 19.4˚C to 30.2˚C, and in December from 18.7˚C to 28.9˚C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). Typically, experiments were carried out with 500 mL of de-oiled PW. Crystals were collected directly from the evaporation pond and analyzed by ICP-OES (Agilent ICP-OES Model-5110). Alternatively, the crystals were collected by vacuum filtration using a sintered glass funnel, dissolved in a minimal amount of water, and then set for evaporation in a MMM Ecocell drying cabinet at 37˚C. Crystals were collected using a sintered glass funnel. Filtrates obtained from the respective operations were re-added to the evaporation ponds.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Oil-Water Separation by Adsorptive Filtration on CGS-Esters</title><p>Adsorption filtration as a tertiary treatment for PW has been reviewed extensively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref40">40</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref42">42</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref43">43</xref>] . Biomass waste has been recognized as adequate sorption material [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref44">44</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref45">45</xref>] that is often cheaply sourced, if not always easy to be disposed of. Biomass waste can be transformed into activated carbon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref46">46</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref47">47</xref>] , but can also be used largely unprocessed or as a scaffold for chemical transformations leading to materials with a tailored surface. Ground nut-shells, specifically walnut shells and pecan nut shells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref48">48</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref50">50</xref>] are standardly used as sorption material in the treatment of PW, also from oil and gas. Other biomass waste materials that have been investigated include corn cobs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref51">51</xref>] , kapok (Ceiba pentandra) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref52">52</xref>] , sago fronds (Cycas circinalis) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref53">53</xref>] , biomass from the giant false agave (Agave gigantea) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref54">54</xref>] , and empty fruit bunches of the oil palm (Elaeis oleifera) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref55">55</xref>] . In all of these cases, the biomass was processed to obtain the cellulose content. In recent years, the possibility of using spent coffee grounds (SCGs) as biowaste derived sorption material for treating oily water was communicated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref56">56</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref57">57</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref58">58</xref>] . This approach separates the cellulose from the lignin by aq. hydroxide extraction, and then optionally derivatises the so-obtained cellulose by either esterification or silylation. As SCGs are a major accumulating biowaste that is readily available, with globally 6 million tons produced annually</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref59">59</xref>] , we opted to adapt the protocol described in ref. 56 and 57. An additional advantage of SCGs is that it is already in powdered form. After drying at 100˚C, CGS was subjected to extraction with 3w% aq. NaOH solution. It is here that much of the lignin which contains phenolic groups is separated from the remaining material, which is mostly cellulosic, by entering the aqueous phase as lignin salt. In this step, hemicellulose is partially also extracted as hemicellulose can be hydrolyzed by aqueous base more easily than cellulose. The cellulosic material was filtered off and dried. During the extraction process, 37.3% - 44.7% of the mass of the material was lost. The water used in the extraction process can be recycled by distillation. We obviated a bleaching process of the material with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl).</p><p>Analysis of the infrared spectra of the original, dried SCGs and the extracted, dried SCGs reveal a number of differences, one of the main being the disappearance of the IR band at 1744 cm<sup>−1</sup>, which is attributed to ester functions present in the lignin and potentially to polysaccharide pectins, the latter of which are less likely to be present in spent coffee grounds (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). The absorption of the ester carboxyl group has been studied both in lignin isolated from natural sources [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref60">60</xref>] , in synthetically modified, esterified lignins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref61">61</xref>] as well as in esterified lignin components [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref62">62</xref>] and the absorption ranges between 1717 cm<sup>−1</sup> and 1760 cm<sup>−1</sup>, with 1744 cm<sup>−1</sup> signaling an aliphatic ester function. The infrared spectrum shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b) matches infrared spectra of cellulose from the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref63">63</xref>] . Next, the cellulosic material was subjected to esterification reactions to produce a hydrophobic surface of an appreciable thickness. A larger number of procedures are known for the preparation of cellulosic esters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref64">64</xref>] , some of which use N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc) as solvent. The authors opted to use acyl chlorides as reagents in DMAc as solvent and pyridine as catalyst and HCl scavenger (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>), obviating the use of the known DMAc-LiCl system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref65">65</xref>] . The resulting cellulosic esters were filtered, washed with CH<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub> - hexane and dried. IR spectra of the esters (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) showed the characteristic ester carboxyl band at 1748 cm<sup>−1</sup>. A comparison of the IR spectrum of the cellulose acetate (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(a)) obtained showed that it exactly matches the IR spectrum of commercially available cellulose acetate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref66">66</xref>] . The ash (mostly inorganic) content of the sieved and dried SCGs was found to be</p><p>1.11 &#177; 0.06 w%. After the SCGs were extracted with 3w% aq. NaOH to separate out the lignin, the ash content of the remaining cellulosic material was measured at an appreciable 10.96 &#177; 1.23 w%. This value was seen to be significantly decreased upon acylation of CGS, with 4.86 w% ash content for cellulose palmitate and 0.26 w% ash content for cellulose acetate. It is believed that salts including remaining sodium ions were still attached to the extracted CGS, which were then released upon reaction of the hydroxyl groups with the acyl chlorides.</p><p>For the adsorptive filtration (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>), two glass column were used, both 35 cm in length, but one with an inner diameter of 2.25 cm (column A) and the other with an inner diameter of 1.70 cm (column B). Column A was filled with cellulosic ester (octanoate or acetate, 2.40 g) and commercially available activated carbon (7.20 g), column B was filled with cellulose palmitate (1.20 g) and activated carbon (3.60 g). To the sorbent layer was added a layer of sand (30 g/15 g) as protection. Thereafter, PW was subjected to adsorptive filtration on these mixed sorbents, with 15.2 L PW-1 run over the cellulose-octanoate/AC column, 17.1 L PW-2 run over the cellulose-acetate/AC column, and 7.7 L PW-2 run over the cellulose-palmitate/PW column. One reason that a mixture of cellulose-ester and AC was used rather than cellulose-ester alone was the worry that due to the small particle size sole use of cellulose ester might lead to clogging once enough oil had been adsorbed. The small particle size of the sorbent and the use of sand as protective layer made back-washing unsuitable for this set-up, in contrast to using walnut shell granules as sorbent material [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref50">50</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref67">67</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref68">68</xref>] . Thus, clogging, even for the mixed sorbent, limits the amount of PW that can be treated per g sorbent material rather than a perceived concentration of effluent oil at the column outflow in form of an oil effluent breakthrough. The TOC of the effluent water was measured to be below 50 ppm. In the case of using cellulose-octanoate/AC as sorbent for the filtration of 15.2 L of PW 14.2 mL oil could be retained. This oil could be recovered, partly by squeezing out the oil from the sorbent material. The oil showed a density of 0.9586 g/mL corresponding to an API gravity of 16.02. The sulfur content of the recovered oil was found to be 5.42%. While PW is now de-oiled, the salt content has remained the same. This was true for PW-1 filtered over CGS-octanoate and for PW-2 filtered over CGS-acetate or CGS-palmitate.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Salt Crystallization</title><p>After de-oiling the PWs, the salt inherent in PWs was to be precipitated as industrial salt. As the adsorptive filtration of PW does not change its inorganic ion content, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows the approximate ion concentration in the PW under study, after being de-oiled by adsorptive fitration over CGS-octanoate and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows the approximate ion concentration of PW-2 after being de-oiled either by CGS-acetate or CGS-palmitate. The density of PW-2 at this stage was ca. 1.113 g/mL. After de-oiling, PWs maintain high Ca [7670 ppm for PW-1], Mg [1730 ppm for PW-1] and Sr [255 ppm for PW-1] concentrations. All of these divalent earth-alkaline metals form salts that are scalants, and their presence in industrial salt (10 pound brine) is unwanted. Thus, their concentration needs to be reduced significantly. The overall idea was to remove the earth-alkaline ions as carbonates under necessarily basic conditions, acidifiy the filtrate and subject the filtrate to evaporation, first in an outdoor evaporation pond. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> shows the overall process schematically.</p><p>To achieve a carbonate concentration in solution in order to remove the earth-alkaline metal species as carbonates can be achieved principally in two different ways – 1) by saturation of the aq. solution with CO<sub>2</sub> which could be obtained as part of flue gases from a separate process or 2) by the addition of solid, but water-soluble alkali metal carbonates. In both cases, it must be noted that in an equilbrium the carbonate concentration in the aq. solution is pH dependent as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>, with the equlibria shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0 playing a role. In the case of adding solid alkali metal carbonates to the solution it can be expected that the reaction to the little soluble earth alkaline metal carbonates such as calcium carbonate (CaCO<sub>3</sub>) is faster than the carbonic acid/bicarbonate/carbonate equilibrium can establish itself.</p><p>When adding aq.1N KOH to PW, both in presence and in absence of CO<sub>2</sub>, the pH of the analyte moves to about pH 10, where it then remains upon further addition of aq. KOH for a time (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1). It is here that reactions take place with the earth-alkaline metal ions, where metal hydroxides are formed in the absence of CO<sub>2</sub> and a mixture of metal carbonates and metal hydroxides are formed in the presence of CO<sub>2</sub> (see below). The low solubility of both carbonates and hydroxides mean that all added hydroxide ions are bound up in the precipitated metal salts. Only upon reaction completion does the pH increase upon further addition of KOH. It should be noted that the addition of aq. KOH to synthetic aq. sodium chloride solution of a concentration similar to that in PW shows no such buffering zone in respect to change of pH.</p><p>Indeed, adding aq. 1N KOH or aq. 1N NaOH solutions dropwise to the PW in the presence of CO<sub>2</sub> leads to a rapid crystallization of a colorless solid which becomes more pronounced with increased pH. Filtration yields a colorless solid, that is hygroscopic, which indicated that a certain amount of Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> would be found in the mixture. Indeed, the IR spectrum shows a strong band for the OH stretching vibration of Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> at 3700 cm<sup>−1</sup>. The CO stretching vibration of CaCO<sub>3</sub> at 1445 cm<sup>−1</sup> is less in evidence (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2(a)). If the mixture is stirred under CO<sub>2</sub> for a further 6 h, Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> converts to Ca(CO)<sub>3</sub>, driven also by the different solubilities of the salts [solubility product K<sub>sp</sub><sub>(25˚C)</sub> CaCO<sub>3</sub> = 4.96 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup>; K<sub>sp</sub><sub>(25˚C)</sub> Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> = 4.68 &#215; 10<sup>−6</sup>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref72">72</xref>] .</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2(b) shows the IR spectrum of the filtered solid collected afterwards, clearly showing that CaCO<sub>3</sub> is by now the main constituent. The solid was also analyzed by completely dissolving it in HCl and subsequently determining the total hardness of the solution by standard titration with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref73">73</xref>] with the idea that the w% of Ca in Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> is quite different from that in CaCO<sub>3</sub>.</p><p>Well realizing that EDTA also complexes Sr<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup>, the results nevertheless clearly show that Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> comprises less than 5% of the material, although a OH-band is still visible at 3700 cm<sup>−1</sup> in the infrared spectrum. Upon addition of solid Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> to PW (7 g for every 200 mL PW), precipitation is very rapid. In the case of an addition of Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> all at once to PW, the filtered solid shows up to 10.8 w% Na in the sample, in addition, 3.5 w% Mg can be found in the solid as well as Sr (8620 ppm) and K (3050 ppm). Upon a portion-wise addition of Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> to PW, lasting a minute, 2.28 - 2.32 w% of Na were found in the filtered solid, Here, also Mg (3.41 w%) and Sr (1.06 w%) were observed. When the filter cake was washed with a minimum amount of water (20 mL per 50 g precipitate), the amount of Na in the CaCO<sub>3</sub> can be reduced to 1.27 w%. It can be expected that all earth alkaline metals precipitate predominately as carbonates. If this is the case, more than 94% of the precipitated calcium is in form of calcium carbonate. At this point, the spectrum of the solid also lacks the tell-tale absorption band in the infrared at 3700 cm<sup>−1</sup> for Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub>, signaling its absence (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3). In addition, most of the heavy metal content can be removed from PW in this way. In various experiments of adding Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> to de-oiled PW, heavy metals could be noted in the precipitate such as Cu (3.8 - 8.9 ppm), Mn (up to 4.5 ppm), and Ni (up to 6.7 ppm), while the concentrations of these metals in the NaCl crystals gained from the filtered PW were all found to be &lt;0.1 ppm (see below).</p><p>Crystallization of salt by evaporation of the filtered and slightly acidified PW gave sodium chloride (NaCl) crystals in their typical cubic shape (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4). The first harvesting was performed after evaporation of 37.5 vol% of the PW-1, the second harvesting after evaporation of overall 67.5 vol% of PW-1, and the final harvesting was carried out after evaporation of 38.7 vol% of the remaining PW-1, leaving 20 vol% PW-1 at the end. Direct evaporation of PW without removal of calcium ions via the carbonate process gave calcium concentrations in the salt crystals of 200 - 400 ppm and magnesium concentrations of 130 - 150 ppm in the first harvest. The last harvest gave salt crystals with a calcium (Ca) concentration of 5100 pm, a magnesium (Mg) concentration of 1490 ppm and a strontium (Sr) concentration of 185 - 190 ppm. In addition, heavy metals such as copper (Cu, 0.56 ppm) and manganese (Mn, 0.36 ppm) could be found.</p><p>The first harvest of PW-1 where calcium had been removed by the carbonate method showed Ca concentration of 32 - 46 ppm, with potassium (K) at 39 - 105 ppm, Mg at 54 - 95 ppm and Sr at 2.4 ppm and with lead (Pb), Cu, Mn and nickel (Ni) at &lt;0.1 ppm. The purity of NaCl salt obtained was calculated to be 99.2 w%. The final harvest of the decalcified PW-1 gave a Ca concentration of 220 ppm. Also in evidence were Mg (190 ppm), K (123 ppm) and Sr (11.8 ppm). All heavy metal conc. (Cu, Pb, Mn, Ni) were found to be below 0.1 ppm.</p><p>Salt crystals from PW treated with aq. NaOH or aq. KOH in the presence of CO<sub>2</sub>, where the solid precipitate formed was immediately filtered after addition of the base, still showed relatively high values of Ca (up to 420 ppm) even in the first harvest due to the fact that in this case there is still an equilibrium that establishes itself among Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> and CaCO<sub>3</sub> via the species CO<sub>2</sub>, HCO 3 − and CO 3 2 − .</p><p>NaCl production was also carried out with PW-2, de-oiled by adsorptive filtration on CGS-palmitate. Here, de-oiled PW was evaporated in 500 mL batches, Here, the first harvest was taken after the brine was reduced to 50 vol%, the second harvest when it was reduced to 26.0 vol% and the third harvest when it was reduced to 16.0 vol%. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows the content of the obtained salt, where the composition and NaCl purity was calculated upon subtraction of the moisture content of the samples.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Benefits of PW Treatment, Industrial Salt Specifications and Industrial Salt Market</title><p>Untreated PW from oil extraction poses substantial environmental risks, including contaminant discharge with adverse effects on ecosystems, both terrestrial and aquatic, and has potential health risks for humans and wildlife. Especially direct disposal exacerbates soil and water contamination, impacting vegetation, aquatic life, and overall ecosystem health. In contrast, treating PW offers significant environmental and economic advantages. The treatment reduces contaminants, minimizes environmental impact, and transforms a waste product into a valuable resource, aligning with principles of resource efficiency and sustainable industrial practices.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Salt composition of harvests 1-3 of PW-2, de-oiled by adsorptive filtration on CGS-palmitate, subsequent treatment with solid Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> and slow evaporation of the residual brine</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >harvest</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1<sup>st</sup> harvest</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2<sup>nd</sup> harvest</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >3<sup>rd</sup> harvest</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amount of salt harvested</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.7 g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.6 g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.6 g</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amount of residual brine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.0 vol%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.0 vol %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.0 vol%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NaCl (purity)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.73%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.73%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.51%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >693 ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >578 ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >769 ppm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >313 ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >212 ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >426 ppm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sr<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0 ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9 ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0 ppm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.5 ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.8 ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >440 ppm</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>In oil and gas operation where PW is sent into discharge wells or is re-injected into the production zone, non-treated PW corrodes the piping infrastructure. While that is also true for the production tubing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref4">4</xref>] , intermittent treatment of PW before disposal or re-injection can reduce corrosion on that side of the infrastructure, limiting the expensive replacing of the piping infrastructure.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> shows the specifications of industrial salt. It can be noted that the salt obtained from PW of a South Kuwaiti oil and gas operation through gravity oil-water separation, adsorptive filtration and precipitation by evaporation is with the specifications of grade 2 industrial salt. The global industrial salt market has been reported to be worth 14.2 billion USD in 2020 and is expected to reach 19.4 billion USD in 2023. In the GCC region, industrial salt is used in the building material and glass industries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref74">74</xref>] . Therefore, an urgency to further treat the industrial salt to achieve table salt quality for the purpose of product marketing is not present.</p><p>Treating PW appears to be a comprehensive solution, offering substantial economic and environmental benefits. If adopted, Kuwait has the potential to become a significant player in industrial salt production, with an estimated annual output of around 15,666,700 metric tons. However, it must be noted that for the above discussed process, 180 g Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> (soda) are used per 1 kg of industrial salt produced. With a price of US$ 50 per ton of industrial salt and of US$ 150 per ton of soda, the process is economically attractive then, when the calcium carbonate (CaCO<sub>3</sub>) that is precipitated can also be used commercially such as a raw primary substance for building materials, as a constituent of cement, as a component in drilling fluids in the oil and gas industry and as a component in many plastic composites. Currently, the purity of the precipitated CaCO<sub>3</sub> in the here-described process is 87.3%, which is not yet adequate for some of the above named uses.</p><p>In essence, the treatment of PW delivers economic advantages through cost reduction and revenue increase while concurrently fostering both operational efficiency and environmental sustainability. It must be noted that while in this</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Specifications of industrial salt [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref75">75</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref76">76</xref>] </title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Grade 1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Grade 2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Our samples from PW-1</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moisture content (max. w%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >less than 1.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NaCl content (min. w%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sup>2+</sup> content (min. w%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 - 46 ppm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg<sup>2+</sup> content (w%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54 - 95 ppm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water insoluble matter (in w%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>work there was no focus on obtaining purified water from PW as the evaporation was not carried out in closed systems, the here-described process can be integrated into a closed system where apart from industrial salt production purified water would be obtained such as in the combination of the process with a solar still [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref77">77</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref78">78</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131308-ref79">79</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>PW from an oil and gas operation situated in South Kuwait was used to produce industrial salt with a reproducible NaCl purity of at least 99.2 w%, when subjecting PW, which had been submitted previously to gravity oil-gas-water separation, to sorption filtration on a mixture of cellulosic esters derived from spent coffee grounds and commercial activated carbon, subsequently to decalcification using solid sodium carbonate and finally selective crystallization in evaporation process. It could be shown that scale-forming earth-alkaline metals that include strontium and magnesium could be retained in the calcium carbonate precipitated during the decalcification process as could heavy metals present in PW, leaving the remaining salt devoid of these contaminating materials.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Part of this research was supported financially by UAEU grant SDG-G0004110. The authors thank CCIC Middle East FZE – Fujairah Branch for the ICP-OES measurements to determine the cation content of the crystallized salt. Also, the authors are grateful to Tim Thiemann, Hannover, for drawing <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Al Salem, F., Al Shamsi, H., Alaryani, M.M.A., Khalaf, B.A.M., Elsheikh, O., Poulose, V., Al Jasem, Y. and Thiemann, T. (2024) Purification of Produced Water from a Sour Oilfield in South Kuwait. 1. Oil-Water Separation and Industrial Salt Production. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 16, 156-180. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2024.162010</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.131308-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salem, F. and Thiemann, T. (2022) Produced Water from Oil and Gas Exploration—Problems, Solutions and Opportunities. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 14, 142-185. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2022.142009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jiménez, S.B., Micó, M.M., Arnaldos, M., Medina, F. and Contreras, S. (2018) State of the Art of Produced Water Treatment. Chemosphere, 96, 186-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.139</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fakhru’l-Razi, A., Pendashteh, A., Abdullah, L.C., Biak, D.R.A., Madaeni, S.S. and Abidin, Z.Z. (2009) Review of Technologies for Oil and Gas Produced Water Treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 170, 530-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.044</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salem, F., Poulose, V., Kawamura, K., Nakamura, A., Saibi, H. and Thiemann, T. (2023) Effects of the Produced Water from a Sour Oilfield in South Kuwait on the Production Tubing. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 15, 358-375. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2023.157021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kamshad, T., Al-Ghamdi, A.R., Siritri, R.S. and Kellow, D. (2016) Risk Assessment for Implementation of Chemical Treatment Programs on Production Wells within the Wafra Oilfield Partition Zone (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait). CORROSION 2016, Vancouver, 6-10 March 2016, Paper Number: NACE-2016-7115. https://onepetro.org/NACECORR/proceedings/CORR16/All-CORR16/NACE-2016-7115/123448</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al-Hashem, A., Carew, J.A. and Al-Sayegh, A. (2000) The Effects of Water-Cut on the Corrosion Behavior L80 Carbon Steel under Downhole Conditions. CORROSION 2000, Orlando, 10-14 March 2000, Paper Number: NACE-00061. https://onepetro.org/NACECORR/proceedings/CORR00/All-CORR00/NACE-00061/111962</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Scott, P.J.B., Al-Hashem, A. and Carew, J.A. (2007) Experiments on MIC of Steel and FRP Downhole Tubulars in West Kuwait Brines. CORROSION 2007, Nashville, 11-15 March 2007, Paper Number: NACE-07113. https://onepetro.org/NACECORR/proceedings/CORR07/All-CORR07/NACE-07113/126604</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sun, W., Pugh, D.V., Ling, S., Reddy, R.V, Pacheco, J.L., Nisbet, R.S., Nor, N.M., Kersey, M.S. and Morshidi, L. (2011) Understanding and Quantifying Corrosion of L80 Carbon Steel in Sour Environments. CORROSION 2011, Houston, 11-15 March 2011, Paper Number: NACE-11063. https://onepetro.org/NACECORR/proceedings/CORR11/All-CORR11/NACE-11063/120595</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smith, S. (2015) Current Understanding of Corrosion Mechanisms Due to H2S in Oil and Gas Production Environments. CORROSION 2015, Dallas, 15-19 March 2015, Paper Number: NACE-2015-5485. https://onepetro.org/NACECORR/proceedings/CORR15/All-CORR15/NACE-2015-5485/123229</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, Z.Y., Liao, W., Wu, W., Du, C. and Li, X. (2017) Failure Analysis of Leakage Caused by Perforation in an L415 Steel Gas Pipeline. Case Studies in Engineering Failure Analysis, 9, 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csefa.2017.07.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, X.G., Zhang, D.W., Liu, Z.Y., Du, C. and Dong, C. (2015) Materials Science: Share Corrosion Data. Nature, 527, 441-442. https://doi.org/10.1038/527441a</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hedar, Y. and Budiyono. (2018) Pollution Impact and Alternative Treatment for Produced Water. E3S Web of Conferences, 31, Article ID: 03004. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183103004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Neff, J., Lee, K. and DeBlois, E.M. (2011) Produced Water: Overview of Composition, Fates, and Effects. In: Lee, K. and Neff, J., Eds., Produced Water, Springer, New York, 3-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0046-2_1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pichtel, J. (2016) Oil and Gas Production Wastewater: Soil Contamination and Pollution Prevention. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, 2016, Article ID: 2707989. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2707989</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nath, F., Chowdhury, M.O.S. and Rahman, M.M. (2023) Navigating Produced Water Sustainability in the Oil and Gas Sector: A Critical Review of Reuse Challenges, Treatment Technologies, and Prospects Ahead. Water, 15, Article 4088. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15234088</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Castro, P. and Huber, M. (2023) Marine Biology. 12th Edition, McGraw Hill Education, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khawaji, A.D., Kutubkhanah, I.K. and Wie, J.M. (2008) Advances in Seawater Desalination Technologies. Desalination, 221, 47-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.067</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lim, Y.J., Goh, K., Kurihara, M. and Wang, R. (2021) Seawater Desalination by Reverse Osmosis: Current Development and Future Challenges in Membrane Fabrication—A Review. Journal of Membrane Science, 629, Article ID: 119292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119292</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pambudi, N.A., Yusafiadi, J., Biddinika, M.K., Estriyanto, Y. and Sarifudin, A. (2022) An Experimental Investigation of Salt Production Improvement by Spraying and Heating. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 30, Article ID: 101739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2021.101739</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Stewart, M. (2008) Three-Phase Oil and Water Separators. In: Stewart, M. and Arnold, K., Eds., Gas-Liquid and Liquid-Liquid Separators, Gulf Professional Publishing, Houston, 131-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-8979-3.00004-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Han, Y., He, L., Luo, X., Lü, Y., Kaiyue, S., Chen, J. and Huang, X. (2017) A Review of the Recent Advances in Design of Corrugated Plate Packs Applied for Oil-Water Separation. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 53, 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.04.029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Young, G.A.B., Wakley, W.D., Taggart, D.L., Andrews, S.L. and Worrell, J.R. (1994) Oil-Water Separation Using Hydrocyclones: An Experimental Search for Optimum Dimensions. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 11, 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-4105(94)90061-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bennett, G.F. and Peters, R.W. (1988) The Removal of Oil from Wastewater by Air Flotation: A Review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Control, 18, 189-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643388809388348</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mondal, S. and Wickramasinghe, S.R. (2008) Produced Water Treatment by Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis Membranes. Journal of Membrane Separation, 322, 162-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.05.039</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zsirai, T., Qiblawey, H., Buzatu, P., Al-Marri, M. and Judd, S.J. (2018) Cleaning of Ceramic Membranes for Produced Water Filtration. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 166, 283-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.03.036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Youssef, R., Qiblawey, H. and El-Naas, M. (2020) Adsorption as a Process for Produced Water Treatment: A Review. Processes, 8, Article 1657. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8121657</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Choi, Y., Kim, Y., Woo, Y.C. and Hwang, I. (2023) Water Management and Produced Water Treatment in Oil sand Plant: A Review. Desalination, 567, Article ID: 116991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2023.116991</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Suhane, S., Dewan, R. and Mohaimin, R. (2022) Potential Use of Treated Produced Water in Irrigation: A Review. In: Siddiqui, N.A., Tauseef, S.M., Abbasi, S.A., Dobhal, R. and Kansal, A., Eds., Advances in Sustainable Development, Springer, Singapore, 87-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4400-9_6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Echchelh, A., Hess, T. and Sakrabani, R. (2018) Reusing Oil and Gas Produced Water for Irrigation of Food Crops in Drylands. Agricultural Water Management, 206, 124-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.05.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Echchelh, A., Hess, T., Sakrabani, R., Prigent, S. and Stefanakis, A.I. (2021) Towards Agro-Environmentally Sustainable Irrigation with Treated Produced Water in Hyper-Arid Environments. Agricultural Water Management, 243, Article ID: 106449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106449</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Niemeyer, J.C., Medici, L.O., Correa, B., Godoy, D., Ribeiro, G., Lima, S.O.F., Santo, F.B. and Carvalho, D.F. (2020) Treated Produced Water in Irrigation: Effects on Soil Fauna and Aquatic Organisms. Chemosphere, 240, Article ID: 124791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124791</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Skalak, K.J., Engle, M.A., Rowan, E.L., Jolly, G.D., Conko, K.M., Benthem, A.J. and Kraemer, T.F. (2014) Surface Disposal of Produced Waters in Western and Southwestern Pennsylvania: Potential for Accumulation of Alkali-Earth Elements in Sediments. International Journal of Coal Geology, 126, 162-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2013.12.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kothawade, T.R. and Naik, S.J. (2023) Reuse of Produced Water as Injection Water. Materialstoday: Proceedings, 77, 168-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.128</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vieira, M. (1951) Sal comum-a técnica das marinhas, Livraria Sá da Costa. Lisbon Portugal.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rodrigues, C.M., Bio, A., Amat, F. and Viera, N. (2011) Artisanal Salt Production in Aveiro/Portugal—An Ecofriendly Process. Saline Systems, 7, Article No. 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1448-7-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cipollina, A., Misseri, A., D’Alì Staiti, G., Galia, A., Micale, G. and Scialdone, O. (2012) Integrated Production of Fresh Water, Sea Salt and Magnesium from Sea Water. Desalination and Water Treatment, 49, 390-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2012.699340</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al Bazedi, G., Ettouney, R.S., Tewfik, S.R., Sorour, M.H. and El-Rifai, M.A. (2014) Salt Recovery from Brine Generated by Large-Scale Seawater Desalination Plants. Desalination and Water Treatment, 52, 4689-4697. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.810381</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vassallo, F., La Corte, D., Cancilla, N., Tamburini, A., Bevacqua, M., Cipollina, A. and Micale, G. (2021) A Pilot-Plant for the Selective Recovery of Magnesium and Calcium from Waste Brines. Desalination, 517, Article ID: 115231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2021.115231</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salem, F. and Thiemann, T. (2024) Variability in Quantity and Salinity of Produced Water from Oil Production in South Kuwait. Engineering, 16, 8-23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gul Zaman, H., Baloo, L., Pendyala, R., Singa, P.K., Ilyas, S.U. and Kutty, S.R.M. (2021) Produced Water Treatment with Conventional Adsorbents and MOF as an Alternative: A Review. Materials, 14, Article 7607. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247607</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pintor, A.M.A., Vilar, V.J.P., Botelho, C.M.S. and Boaventura, R.A.R. (2016) Oil and Grease Removal from Wastewaters: Sorption Treatment as an Alternative to State-of-the-Art Technologies. A Critical Review. Chemical Engineering Journal, 297, 229-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.03.121</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Emenike, E.C., Adeleke, J., Iwuozor, K.O., Ogunniyi, S., Aeyanju, C.A., Amusa, V.T., Okoro, H.K. and Aeniyi, A.G. (2022) Adsorption of Crude Oil from Aqueous Solution: A Review. Journal of Water Processing, 50, Article ID: 103330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.103330</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sobolciak, P., Popelka, A., Tanvir, A., Al-Maadeed, M.A., Adham, S. and Krupa, I. (2020) Materials and Technologies for the Tertiary Treatment of Produced Water Contaminated by Oil Impurities through Nonfibrous Deep-Bed Media: A Review. Water, 12, Article 3419. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123419</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Doshi, B., Sillanpaa, M. and Kalliola, S. (2018) A Review of Bio-Based Materials for Oil Spill Treatment. Water Research, 135, 262-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.02.034</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vahabisani, A. and An, C. (2021) Use of Biomass-Derived Adsorbents for the Removal of Petroleum Pollutants from Water: A Mini-Review. Environmental Systems Research, 10, Article No. 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-021-00229-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yahya, M.A., Al-Qodah, Z. and Ngah, C.W.Z. (2015) Agricultural Bio-Waste Materials as Potential Sustainable Precursors Used for Activated Carbon Production: A Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 46, 218-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.051</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wong, S., Ngadi, N., Inuwa, I.M. and Hassan, O. (2018) Recent Advances in Applications of Activated Carbon from Biowaste for Wastewater Treatment: A Short Review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 361-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.059</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rawlins, C.H. and Sadeghi, F. (2018) Experimental Study on Oil Removal in Nutshell Filters for Produced-Water Treatment. SPE Production &amp; Operations, 33, 145-153. https://doi.org/10.2118/186104-PA</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Blumenschein, C.D., Severing, K.W. and Boyle, E. (2001) Walnut Shell Filtration for Oil and Solids. AISE Steel Technology, 78, 33-37.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rahman, S.S. (1992) Evaluation of Filtering Efficiency of Walnut Granules as Deep-Bed Filter Media. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 7, 239-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-4105(92)90021-R</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sartika, D., Firmansyah, A.P., Junais, I., Arnata, I.W., Fahma, F. and Firmanda, A. (2023) High Yield Production of Nanocrystalline Cellulose from Corn Cob through a Chemical-Mechanical Treatment under Mild Conditions. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 240, Article ID: 124327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124327</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sartika, D., Syamsu, K., Warsiki, E., Fahma, F. and Arnata, I.W. (2021) Nanocrystalline Cellulose from Kapok Fiber (Ceiba pentandra) and Its Reinforcement Effect on Alginate Hydrogel Bead. Starch, 73, Article ID: 2100033. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.202100033</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arnata, I.W., Suprihatin, S., Fahma, F., Richana, N. and Sunarti, T.C. (2020) Cationic Modification of Nanocrystalline Cellulose from Sago Fronds. Cellulose, 27, 3121-3141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02955-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Syafri, E., Jamaluddin, N.H., Sari, M., Mahardika, Amanda, P. and Ilyas, R.A. (2022) Isolation and Characterization of Cellulose Nanofibers from Agave gigantea by Chemical-Mechanical Treatment. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 200, 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.12.111</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maghfirah, A., Fahma, F., Lisdayana, N., Yunus, M., Kusumaatmaja, A. and Kadja, G.T.M. (2022) On the Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)—Alginate Composite Yarn Reinforced with Nanocellulose from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 22, Article 67881. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.67881</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shi, C., Chen, Y., Yu, Z., Li, S., Chan, H., Sun, S., Chen, G., He, M. and Tian, J. (2021) Sustainable and Superhydrophobic Spent Coffee Ground-Derived Holocellulose Nanofibers Foam for Continuous Oil/Water Separation. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 28, e00277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2021.e00277</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, K.T., Cheng, C.L., Lee, D.S., Chen, W.H., Vo, D.V.N., Ding, L. and Lam, S.S. (2022) Spent Coffee Grounds Biochar from Torrefaction as a Potential Adsorbents for Spilled Diesel Oil Recovery and as an Alternative Fuel. Energy, 239, Article ID: 122467.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122467</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Nasaruddin, N.F.N., Halim, H.N.A., Rozi, S.K.M., Mokhtar, Z., Tan, L.S. and Jusoh, N.W.C. (2022) Potential of Pretreated Spent Coffee Ground as Adsorbent for Oil Adsorption. In: Mohamed Noor, N., Sam, S.T. and Abdul Kadir, A., Eds., Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Green Environmental Engineering and Technology, Springer, Singapore, 427-434. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7920-9_51</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Janissen, B. and Huynh, T. (2018) Chemical Composition and Value-Adding Applications of Coffee Industry by-Products: A Review. Resources, Conservation, and Recycling, 128, 110-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boeriu, C.G., Bravo, D., Gosselink, R.J.A. and van Dam, J.E.G. (2004) Characterisation of Structure-Dependent Functional Properties of Lignin with Infrared Spectroscopy. Industrial Crops and Products, 20, 205-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2004.04.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gordobil, O., Robles, E., Egüés, I. and Labidi, J. (2016) Lignin-Ester Derivatives as Novel Thermoplastic Materials. RSC Advances, 6, Article ID: 86909. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA20238A</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, X., Zhang, Y., Wei, L., Hu, H., Huang, Z., Yang, M., Hwang, A., Wu, J. and Feng, Z. (2017) Esterification Mechanism of Lignin with Different Catalysts Based on Lignin Model Compounds by Mechanical Activation-Assisted Solid-Phase Synthesis. RSC Advances, 7, 52382-52390. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA10482K</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, W., He, H., Zhu, H., Cheng, M., Li, Y. and Wang, S. (2018) Thermo-Responsive Cellulose-Based Material with Switchable Wettability for Controllable Oil/Water Separation. Polymers, 10, Article 592. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10060592</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, Y., Wang, X., Xie, Y. and Zhang, K. (2018) Functional Nanomaterials through Esterification of Cellulose: A Review of Chemistry and Application. Cellulose, 25, 3703-3713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1830-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, C., Liu, R., Xiang, J., Kang, H., Liu, Z. and Huang, Y. (2014) Dissolution Mechanism of Cellulose in N, N-Dimethylacetamide/Lithium Chloride: Revisiting through Molecular Interactions. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 118, 9507-9514. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp506013c</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sudiarti, T., Wahyuningrum, D., Bundjali, B. and Made Arcana, I. (2017) Mechanical Strength and Ionic Conductivity of Polymer Electrolyte Membranes Prepared from Cellulose Acetate—Lithium Perchlorate. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 223, Article ID: 012052. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/223/1/012052</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Srinivasan, A. and Viraraghavan, T. (2008) Removal of Oil by Walnut Shell Media. Bioresource Technology, 99, 8217-8220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.03.072</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gallo-Cordova, A., Silva-Gordillo, M.M., Munoz, G.A., Arboleda-Faini, X. and Streitwieser, D.A. (2017) Comparison of the Adsorption Capacity of Organic Compounds Present in Produced Water with Commercially Obtained Walnut Shell and Residual Biomass. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 5, 4041-4050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.07.052</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aqion. The Open Carbonate System. https://www.aqion.de/site/open-co2-system</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pederson, O., Colmer, T.D. and Sand-Jensen, K. (2013) Underwater Photosynthesis of Submerged Plants—Recent Advances and Methods. Frontiers in Plant Science, 4, Article 140. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00140</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schwarzenbach, G. and Meier, J. (1958) Formation and Investigation of Unstable Protonation and Deprotonation Products of Complexes in Aqueous Solution. Journal of Inorganic Nuclear Chemistry, 8, 302-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1902(58)80195-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lide, D.R. (1990) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 71st Edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ferreira, D., Barros, M., Oliveira, C.M. and Bettencourt da Silva, R.J.N. (2019) Quantification of the Uncertainty of the Visual Detection of the End-Point of a Titration: Determination of Total Hardness in Water. Microchemical Journal, 146, 856-863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2019.01.069</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">(2023) Industrial Salts Market Statistics. Industry Analysis 2030. Allied Market Research. https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/industrial-salts-market-A14208</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">(2023) Tanzania Bureau of Standards, Draft Tanzania Standard, TBS/CDC 7 (5816) (Revision of TZS 134:1981). https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2020/TBT/TZA/20_2923_00_e.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salt Department, Industrial Grade Salt (2023) Common Salt for Chemical Industries under BIS: IS: 797-1982. https://www.saltcomindia.gov.in/IndustrialGrade.html?tp=Salt</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sivakumar, V. and Sundaram, E.G. (2013) Improvement Techniques of Solar Still Efficiency: A Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 28, 246-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.037</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kaushal, A. and Varun (2010) Solar stills: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, 446-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.05.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131308-ref79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elango, C., Gunasekaran, N. and Sampathkumar, K. (2015) Thermal Models of Solar Still—A Comprehensive Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45, 856-911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.054</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>