<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ARSci</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Reproductive Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2330-0744</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/arsci.2024.121004</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ARSci-131274</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Effect of Uterine Artery Occlusion with Tourniquet on Ovarian Reserve during Open Myomectomy at a University Teaching Hospital in Southern Nigeria
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>William</surname><given-names>Amebeobari Mube</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Justina</surname><given-names>Omoikhefe Alegbeleye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ngozi</surname><given-names>Clare Orazulike</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital Rivers State, Port Harcourt, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>27</day><month>12</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>37</fpage><lpage>50</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>28,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>22,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Background: 
  The most common surgical treatment for symptomatic uterine fibroids, particularly in women with fertility concerns, is open myomectomy. Given the high vascularity of the uterus, haemorrhage during the procedure is a serious risk that is often mitigated with a uterine tourniquet. <b>Aim and Objectives: </b>To evaluate the effect of uterine artery occlusion with a tourniquet during open myomectomy on ovarian reserve using serial anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) measurements. <b>Materials and Methods: </b>This was a prospective longitudinal study with a quasi-experimental design and a convenient sampling technique. The study enrolled 47 women who had abdominal myomectomy between September 1, 2021, and March 31, 2022, at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital. Blood samples were collected before anaesthesia was administered in theatre, on day two, and three months after open abdominal myomectomy for anti-Mullerian hormone assay. The data was collected using a semi-structured proforma, entered into an Excel spreadsheet, and analyzed using SPSS version 25.0 with a 95% confidence interval. Statistical significance level was set at 0.05. <b>Results: </b>The pre-surgery AMH mean value was 1.67 &#177; 1.44
   
  ng/ml, while the values after using a uterine tourniquet at myomectomy on the second day and three months later were 1.22 &#177; 1.24
   
  ng/ml and 1.59 &#177; 1.43
   
  ng/ml, respectively. There was no statistically significant change in AMH levels, and there was no statistically significant relationship between blood loss and tourniquet time and AMH after open abdominal myomectomy. <b>Conclusion: </b>
  The use of a uterine tourniquet and blood loss during open myomectomy has no effect on ovarian reserve.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Uterine Tourniquet</kwd><kwd> Open Abdominal Myomectomy</kwd><kwd> Ovarian Reserve</kwd><kwd>  Anti-Mullerian Hormone</kwd><kwd> Nigeria</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Uterine fibroids, also known as uterine leiomyomas, are benign uterine tumours composed primarily of smooth muscles and varying amounts of connective tissue. They have a monoclonal origin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref2">2</xref>] . They have a 20% - 25% incidence and rise to nearly 50% by the fifth decade of life, making them the most common female reproductive tract tumours [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref2">2</xref>] . The prevalence of uterine fibroid varies according to race, tribe, age, family history, and other factors. Black people have higher prevalence rates than Caucasians and Hispanics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>Globally, the prevalence of uterine fibroids range between 4.5% and 9.8% in developed countries. In Nigeria, it is 21.4% in Kano, 13.3% in Ilorin, and 33.3% in Port Harcourt [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>Causes of uterine fibroids are unknown. Nulliparity, advanced maternal age, a family history of myomas, oral contraceptives, hormone replacement therapy, early menarche, a sedentary lifestyle, and obesity are all risk factors for uterine fibroids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref3">3</xref>] . Meanwhile, cigarette smoking, two full-term pregnancies, and increased parity are thought to reduce its occurrence [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>The management options are expectant, medical, surgical, and radiological. This is determined by the patient's age, parity, pregnancy status, reproductive plans, general well-being, and the size and location of the leiomyomas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref7">7</xref>] . Asymptomatic fibroids are usually managed expectantly. The mainstay of treatment for leiomyomas is surgery, and open abdominal myomectomy is the most common surgical management, particularly for women with fertility concerns, whereas hysterectomy is the definitive treatment and is usually offered to women with completed family size [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref10">10</xref>] . In the tropics, other uncommon forms of treatment include uterine artery embolization, myolysis, uterine artery ligation, hysteroscopic myoma resection, and laparoscopic laser treatment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref10">10</xref>] . Prior to surgery, danazol, antiprogesterones, and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and antagonist can be administered to cause endometrial atrophy and shrink the fibroids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref10">10</xref>] .<sup> </sup></p><p>Open abdominal myomectomy, offered to women with symptomatic myomas concerned about their fertility poses a significant challenge of haemorrhage during and after the procedure due to uterus's high vascularity. In the tropics, uterine artery occlusion with a tourniquet is commonly used; it temporarily occludes the uterine arteries, which also supply blood to the ovaries, with the potential of interfering with normal ovarian physiology [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref3">3</xref>] . Although there are some concerns about the use of uterine tourniquets, it is still a valuable tool for many doctors, particularly in the tropics where there are many myomas and cultures that are opposed to blood transfusions because its use temporarily blocks blood flow to the uterus and ovaries, allowing a bloodless surgical site and increasing surgeons’ comfort [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Furthermore, the tourniquet’s arterial ligation causes tissue compression at the tourniquet’s numerous points of passage in addition to temporarily stopping the blood flow downstream. The consequences of ischaemia and reperfusion from this circulatory disruption could include tissue damage, cell necrosis, organ physiological failure, and even a reduction in ovarian reserve. Systemic complications have been reported during various non-gynaecological surgeries involving tourniquets; most of which result from the length of the application and subsequent relaxation. The average time required to apply a tourniquet during uterine surgery is 60 minutes, not including rest intervals. Alternatively, the timing of the onset of ischaemia and reperfusion at the uterine and systemic levels while using tourniquet needs to be better established as several researchers have not documented specifically when the ischaemia first occurred or how they manifested systemically [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>The anti-Mullerian hormone is frequently used to evaluate ovarian reserve. It is secreted by the granulosa cells of small antral and pre-antral follicles. Its function is unknown, but research suggests that it influences ovarian steroidogenesis and follicular recruitment. In contrast to other biochemical indicators, AMH can be detected on any day of the cycle and does not fluctuate between cycles. Poor responders were identified using various threshold values ranging from 0.2 - 1.26 ng/ml, with sensitivity of 80% - 87% and specificity of 64% - 93%. Nomograms are used to detect age-related physiological declines in ovarian reserve and AMH levels, and abnormal deviations can be used to counsel couples concerned about their fertility. The anti-Mullerian hormone is unaffected by gonadotropin, and its value remains relatively constant throughout menstrual cycles. It is simple to measure, minimally intrusive, and offers a high degree of predictability; as a result, it is regarded as the most reliable marker for ovarian reserve or function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref15">15</xref>] .<sup> </sup></p><p>Several studies using AMH found no significant effect on ovarian function after myomectomy when the uterine tourniquet was used; however, other studies revealed a transient or short-term change in ovarian function after myomectomy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref18">18</xref>] .<sup> </sup>Concerns have been raised that the ischaemic reperfusion injury caused by the single tourniquet approach, which is commonly used to limit blood loss during abdominal myomectomy, may diminish or modify ovarian reserve, affecting conception. Furthermore, many of these scientific studies excluded the black race, which is known to have more symptomatic myomas. This study was conceptualized given the premium placed on pregnancy and childbirth in Africa.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area</title><p>The study was carried out at the Gynaecology unit of the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital (UPTH). The UPTH is an 884-bed hospital located at Alakahia in Obio Akpor Local Government Area of Rivers State, South-South Nigeria. It is a tertiary health institution that provides all levels of health care services to Rivers, Bayelsa, Delta, Imo, Abia, and Akwa-Ibom states.</p><p>The gynaecology clinic is open Monday through Friday. Nurses register patients at each clinic, recording their height, weight, and blood pressure. Following that, the patients are seen by doctors who take a detailed history, perform physical examinations, and make a clinical diagnosis. Specific investigations are requested based on the clinical diagnosis, and appropriate treatment is instituted. Patients are then followed up on at various intervals. This process was used to recruit the patients used for this study.</p><p>The patients with uterine fibroids that require surgical treatment are counselled at the clinic before being admitted to the gynaecology ward, where they are reviewed by other relevant specialties and certified fit for surgery. On the average, one hundred and ten (110) open abdominal myomectomies are performed per annum accounting for approximately 40% of major gynaecological surgeries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref19">19</xref>] .<sup> </sup></p><p>The Chemical Pathology department is staffed by consultant chemical pathologists, resident doctors, and laboratory scientists at the hospital. The chemical pathology laboratory is well-equipped and was used for AMH assay.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Study Design</title><p>A prospective longitudinal study with a quasi-experimental design was used for this study. The study included patients who had open abdominal myomectomy and were between the ages of 18 and 40. Patients over the age of 40, use of Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Agonists in the previous 3 months, concurrent ovarian surgery, association with adnexal tumours or previous adnexal surgery, preoperative evidence of ovarian insufficiency, suspicion of gynaecological malignancy, exposure to radiotherapy or chemotherapy, and endometriosis were excluded.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Sampling Technique</title><p>This sample size was calculated with a 95% confidence level using Rosner’s formula [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref20">20</xref>] . The study had a sample size of 52 participants. The convenience sampling technique was used to recruit participants for the study as all patients scheduled for myomectomy at the gynaecology clinic who met the eligibility criteria and provided consent were recruited.</p><p>The purpose and benefits of the study were duly explained to the participants at the gynaecology clinic, and written informed consent was obtained in the ward. All relevant data were obtained from the patient’s case file and entered into the research proforma. Five registrars were recruited as research assistants, and they received extensive training in patient selection and counselling, blood sample collection, and proper data collection sheet completion. Meanwhile, the anaesthetic team at the study centre routinely recorded blood loss, surgery time, and tourniquet time.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Sample Collection and Processing</title><p>The laboratory work of this study was carried out at the Chemical Pathology department of the hospital by trained chemical pathologists. Five millilitres of venous blood were drawn from the patient’s cubital vein using a sterile disposable syringe and needle with a tourniquet after proper aseptic precautions. The blood samples were collected into a plain redtop venepuncture tube without additives or anticoagulants by the principal investigator and research assistants before induction of anaesthesia in the theatre, two days, and three months after open myomectomy. The blood samples were sent immediately to the chemical pathology laboratory, where it was centrifuged for 20 mins at 4000 rpm and 4˚C to obtain sera. The separated sera were collected using a pipette, and the assay was done immediately within 30 minutes of blood collection. However, for the specimen that could not be assayed immediately after blood withdrawal, the samples were stored at a temperature of 2˚C - 8˚C for up to seven days or −20˚C for up to 30 days for later analysis using an enzyme-linked immune-sorbent assay kit (AMH Accubind Test system). The result was calculated and interpreted based on the patients’ age. The reference ranges are 1.57 - 12.41 ng/ml for ages 20 - 29 years, 0.11 - 12.67 ng/ml for 30 - 39 years and 0.02 - 9.77 ng/ml for those between 40 - 49 years.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Ethical Consideration</title><p>Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the research ethics committee of the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital. The ethical clearance certificate number was UPTH/ADM/90/S. II/VOL.XI/1220. All participants were adequately counselled and written consent was obtained, before enrolment. The study was carried out under strict confidentiality.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Data Analysis</title><p>Data were entered into an excel spread sheet and analyzed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 25 at 95% confidence interval. Continuous variables were summarised using means and standard deviations while categorical variables were expressed as proportions and frequencies. The difference in means was compared using the paired t-test (for 2 mean groups) and Analysis of Variance-ANOVA (for 3 mean groups). An observation was said to be statistically significant if the p-value was less or equal to 0.05 (p ≤ 0.05).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>The study enlisted the participation of 52 women who met the inclusion criteria. However, five study participants who had previously lived in the study area relocated and dropped out. As a result, data from 47 women were analysed, yielding a 90% compliance rate. Most of the women 17 (36%) were aged 35 to 39 years, 27 (57%) were single, and 30 (64%) had tertiary education. Many of them 39 (82.9%) were nulliparous, and 23 (49%) had normal body mass index (BMI) of 18.5 - 24.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> demonstrated these findings.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> showed that menorrhagia was the most common symptom 43 (91.5%), followed by abdominal pain 36 (76.6%). The mean preoperative anti-Mullerian hormone assay was 1.67 ng/ml.</p><p>In terms of surgical characteristics, the tourniquet time was 45 - 60 minutes for 21 of the participants (51.1%), while the duration of surgery was 90 - 120 minutes for 27 (57.5%) of the women. The locations of the fibroids were submucous 46 (97.9%), followed by subserous 37 (78.7%) and intramural 36 (76.6%).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Socio-demographic characteristics of patients</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency (n = 47)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percent (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 - 29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 - 39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marital Status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Married</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Divorced</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Educational Status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secondary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tertiary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unemployed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Student</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Civil servant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Business</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BMI (kg/m<sup>2</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.5 - 24.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 - 29.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Pre-surgery characteristics of patients</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency (n = 47)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percent (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >*Fibroid symptoms</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Menorrhagia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pressure symptoms</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Infertility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AMH (ng/ml)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean (SD) [Min, Max]</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.67 &#177; 1.44 [0.26, 7.08]</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>SD = Standard deviation **Multiple responses apply.</p><p>In 21 (44.7%) of the procedures, less than 500 mls of blood was lost, and 35 (74.4%) of the procedures were performed by consultants. The most common skin incision was a transverse suprapubic incision 38 (80.9%), and most patients 29 (61.7%) had combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> showed these results.</p><p>As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, the mean anti-Mullerian Hormone assay for the second postoperative day was 1.22 ng/ml. None of the participants were admitted for more than seven days after the operation. Three months after surgery, the mean anti-Mullerian Hormone assay was 1.59ng/ml. The effect of uterine artery occlusion during open abdominal myomectomy on anti-Mullerian Hormone levels is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> (pre-surgery, second day, and three months post-surgery). The mean pre-surgery AMH level was 1.67 &#177; 1.44 ng/ml, which reduced to 1.22 &#177; 1.24 ng/ml on the second post-surgery day before increasing to 1.59 &#177; 1.43 ng/ml three months later, a value close to the pre-surgery AMH value. However, no statistically significant change in AMH levels was observed across the three time periods.</p><p>The mean pre-surgery AMH level for the &lt; 45 mins group was 1.22 &#177; 1.31 ng/ml, which was significantly lower than the other groups. The mean AMH level decreased on the second post-surgery day across the four tourniquet time groups, returning to near pre-surgery levels three months later. However, there was no statistically significant relationship between tourniquet time and anti-Mullerian hormone levels during open myomectomy (pre-surgery p = 0.802; second day post-surgery p = 0.786; 3 months post-surgery p = 0.831). This was shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>.</p><p>The mean pre-surgery AMH level for the &lt; 500 mls blood group was 1.54 &#177; 1.63 ng/ml, which was slightly lower than the 500 - 1000 mls group and significantly lower than the &gt; l000 mls group. The mean AMH level decreased steadily across the three blood loss groups on the second post-surgery day, corresponding to an increase in blood loss, and returned to nearly pre-surgery levels three months later (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>).</p><p>The mean pre-surgery AMH level was 1.67 &#177; 1.44 ng/ml, dropped to 1.22 &#177;</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Surgical characteristics of patients</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percent (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tourniquet time (mins)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;45 - 60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;60 - 90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;90 - 120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Duration of surgery (mins)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 - 90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;90 - 120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number of fibroids</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;10 - 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;21 - 30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Largest diameter (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 - 10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;10 - 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >*Sites of fibroids (n = 119)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sub-serous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intramural</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sub-mucous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Estimated blood loss</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;500 mls</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;500 mls - 1000 mls</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;1000 mls</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cadre of surgeon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Senior Registrar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Consultant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Type of skin incision</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Midline</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Transverse suprapubic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Type of Anaesthesia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SAB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Epidural and SAB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*SAB: Subarachnoid block *Multiple responses apply.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Post-Surgery characteristics of patients</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency (n = 47)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percent (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2<sup>nd</sup> day Post-Surgery AMH (ng/ml)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean (SD) [Min, Max]</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.22 &#177; 1.24 [0.21, 6.8]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Duration of hospital stay</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;7 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;7 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-operative complications</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anaemia with Blood Transfusion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 months Post-Surgery AMH (ng/ml)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean (SD) [Min, Max]</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.59 &#177; 1.43 [0.24, 6.96]</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*SD = Standard deviation.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of uterine artery occlusion during open abdominal myomectomy on anti-Mullerian Hormone levels</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Group</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean &#177; SD (ng/ml)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ANOVA</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-Surgery AMH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.67 &#177; 1.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2<sup>nd</sup> day Post-Surgery AMH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.22 &#177; 1.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.236</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 months Post-Surgery AMH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.59 &#177; 1.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*ANOVA = Analysis of variance.</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of tourniquet time on anti-Mullerian Hormone levels</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variables Tourniquet time</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >AMH Level</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre Surgery (ng/ml) Mean &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ANOVA (p-value)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2<sup>nd</sup> day post-Surgery (ng/ml) Mean &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ANOVA (p-value)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 months post-Surgery (ng/ml) Mean &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ANOVA (p-value)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤45 mins</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.22 &#177; 1.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.95 &#177; 1.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15 &#177; 1.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;45 - 60 mins</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.78 &#177; 1.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35 (0.802)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.27 &#177; 1.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35 (0.786)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.67 &#177; 1.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29 (0.831)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;60 - 90 mins</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.65 &#177; 1.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17 &#177; 0.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.62 &#177; 1.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;90 - 120 mins</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.14 &#177; 1.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.95 &#177; 1.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.01 &#177; 1.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*ANOVA = Analysis of variance.</p><p>1.24 ng/ml on the second post-surgery day, and slightly decreased to 1.59 &#177; 1.43 ng/ml three months later (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>). <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref> compares the effect of uterine artery occlusion during open myomectomy on anti-Mullerian hormone levels on the</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of blood loss on anti-Mullerian Hormone levels</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variables Estimated blood loss</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >AMH level</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre Surgery (ng/ml) Mean &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ANOVA (p-value)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2<sup>nd</sup> day post-Surgery (ng/ml) Mean &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ANOVA (p-value)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 months post-Surgery (ng/ml) Mean &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ANOVA (p-value)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;500 mls</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.54 &#177; 1.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.13 &#177; 1.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.42 &#177; 1.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;500 - 1000 mls</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.66 &#177; 1.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51 (0.604)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.18 &#177; 0.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48 (0.620)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.59 &#177; 1.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69 (0.508)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;1000 mls</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.21 &#177; 1.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.69 &#177; 1.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.20 &#177; 1.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*ANOVA = Analysis of variance.</p><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of the effect of uterine artery occlusion during open abdominal myomectomy on Pre-surgery and Post-surgery anti-Mullerian Hormone levels</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Group</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean &#177; SD (ng/ml)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >t-test</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-Surgery AMH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.67 &#177; 1.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >1.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2<sup>nd</sup> day Post-Surgery AMH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.22 &#177; 1.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.105</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 months Post-Surgery AMH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.59 &#177; 1.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.778</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*T-test: Student t-test.</p><table-wrap id="table9" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of the effect of uterine artery occlusion during open myomectomy on second day and three months post-surgery Anti-Mullerian Hormone levels</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Group</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean &#177; SD (ng/ml)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >t-test</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2<sup>nd</sup> day Post-Surgery AMH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.22 &#177; 1.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 months Post-Surgery AMH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.59 &#177; 1.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.182</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*T-test: Student t-test.</p><p>second day and three months after surgery. The average second-day post-surgery AMH level was 1.22 &#177; 1.24 ng/ml, rising to 1.59 &#177; 1.43 ng/ml three months later, almost matching the pre-surgery AMH value. However, no statistically significant difference in AMH was observed between the two groups (p = 0.182).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Open abdominal myomectomy is the most common surgical management for symptomatic uterine fibroids in women with fertility concerns; however, it is associated with haemorrhage. A uterine tourniquet is frequently used during myomectomy to reduce blood loss by temporarily occluding the blood supply to the uterus and ovaries. This is thought to result in ischaemic reperfusion injury, which may impair ovarian function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref11">11</xref>] .<sup> </sup></p><p>This study’s mean pre-surgery Anti-Mullerian Hormone assay was 1.67 ng/ml, indicating normal ovarian reserve. The values after using a uterine tourniquet during myomectomy on the second day and three months later were 1.22 ng/ml and 1.59 ng/ml, respectively. The decrease in AMH level on the second post-surgery day could be due to ischaemia caused by the occlusion of blood vessels by the tourniquet. Although the AMH level decreased between pre-surgery and second-day values, this was not statistically significant. Similar findings have been reported by Chen et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref18">18</xref>] ,<sup> </sup>Mehdizadehkash et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref14">14</xref>] , Sander et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref16">16</xref>] , and Farag et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref21">21</xref>] . It did, however, differ from the findings of Aharon et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref15">15</xref>] , Brown et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref19">19</xref>] , Migahed et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref20">20</xref>] , and Wang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref22">22</xref>] , who reported a significant decrease in AMH level. This disparity could be attributed to the earlier anti-Mullerian hormone assays performed on the first postoperative day, as well as the smaller sample sizes in these studies.</p><p>The tourniquet time for most of the participants ranged between 45 - 60 minutes, as advocated by Essone et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref11">11</xref>] . However, there is no standard time for using a tourniquet during a myomectomy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref11">11</xref>] .<sup> </sup>The mean pre-surgery AMH level for the 45 mins group was 1.22 &#177; 1.31, which was significantly lower than the 45 - 60 mins (1.78 &#177; 1.69), 60 - 90 mins (1.65 &#177; 1.05), and 90 - 120 mins (2.14 &#177; 1.60) groups. This significant reduction in the &lt; 45 mins group was because most participants in that category were between 30 - 39 years when AMH values of 0.11 - 12.67 ng/ml are considered normal. Thus the &lt; 45 mins AMH level is within normal limits.</p><p>The mean AMH levels were significantly lower on the second post-surgery day across the four tourniquet time groups, returning to near pre-surgery levels three months later. This could be because restoring blood to ischaemic tissues and recovering from ischaemic reperfusion injury may be insufficient on the second day after surgery but should be nearly complete three months later [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref15">15</xref>] .<sup> </sup></p><p>This study found no statistically significant relationship between tourniquet time during open abdominal myomectomy and anti-Mullerian hormone levels. These results are consistent with Migahed et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref20">20</xref>] , and Aharon et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref15">15</xref>] . This also supports Bulat’s observation that the ovaries are resistant to ischemia-reperfusion damage even after prolonged ischaemia and that follicular reserve can function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref23">23</xref>] .<sup> </sup></p><p>In terms of the effect of blood loss during open abdominal myomectomy on AMH level, the mean pre-surgery AMH level for the 500 mls blood group was slightly lower than for the 500 - 1000 mls group and significantly lower than for the &gt; 1000 mls group. This is because most participants in the &lt; 500 mls and 500 - 1000 mls blood loss groups were between 30 - 39 years when AMH values of 0.11 - 12.67 ng/ml are considered normal. On the second postoperative day, the AMH level was also found to be lower. It was observed that there was a steady decline in AMH levels with increasing blood loss, indicating that increasing blood loss at myomectomy worsens tissue hypoxia and ischaemia and may have an effect on ovarian reserve. However, this relationship was not statistically significant. This is consistent with the findings of Migahed et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref20">20</xref>] , and Aharon et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>The results of the study on the trend in anti-Mullerian hormone levels after open abdominal myomectomy revealed a decrease in the value of AMH on the second post-surgery day compared to the pre-surgery value; however, this difference was not statistically significant. This is similar to the report by Browne et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref19">19</xref>] . It also agrees with Migahed et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref20">20</xref>] . However, in the studies by Wang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref22">22</xref>] , and Aharon et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref15">15</xref>] , the early decline in AMH levels was statistically significant, which may be explained by the smaller sample sizes used.</p><p>Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference in AMH levels before and after surgery at three months. These findings are consistent with reports by previous research [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref22">22</xref>] . However, this did not correlate with the findings of Browne et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131274-ref19">19</xref>] who observed that AMH value decreased up to 18 months after myomectomy. The small sample size may have influenced their results.</p><p>The larger sample size of this study compared to previous studies is its strength. It was, however, a single-centre, quasi-experimental study without a control arm or randomisation. As a result, a larger sample size randomised multi-centre control trial should be conducted, which would be fully representative of the general population.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Although open abdominal myomectomy is a common treatment for symptomatic uterine fibroids, it is associated with haemorrhage. The use of uterine tourniquets during open abdominal myomectomy reduces blood loss significantly. According to the findings of this study, the use of a uterine tourniquet, its duration of use, and blood loss during open myomectomy had no effect on ovarian reserve. As a result, regardless of the duration of application, using a uterine tourniquet during open abdominal myomectomy is recommended.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Mube, W.A., Alegbeleye, J.O. and Orazulike, N.C. (2024) The Effect of Uterine Artery Occlusion with Tourniquet on Ovarian Reserve during Open Myomectomy at a University Teaching Hospital in Southern Nigeria. Advances in Reproductive Sciences, 12, 37-50. https://doi.org/10.4236/arsci.2024.121004</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.131274-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Kwawukume, E.Y. and Ntumy, M.Y. (2017) Uterine Leiomyomas. In: Kwawukume, E.Y., Emuveyan, E.E., Danso, K.A. and Ekele, B.A., Eds., Comprehensive Gynaecology in the Tropics, 2nd Edition, G-Pak Limited, Accra, 173-186.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131274-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Ugwu, G.O. and Obioha, E.P. (2017) Uterine Leiomyoma. In: Umeora, O.U.J., Egbuji, C.C., Onyebuchi, A.K. and Ezeonu, P.O., Eds., Our Teachers: A Comprehensive Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1st Edition, St. Benedict Printing and Publishing, Abakaliki, 444-446.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131274-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zimmermann, A., Bernuit, D., Gerlinger, C., Schaefers, M. and Geppert, K. (2012) Prevalence, Symptoms, and Management of Uterine Fibroids: An International Internet-Based Survey of 21,746 Women. BMC Women’s Health, 12, Article No. 6. 
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-12-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131274-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Garba, I., Ayyuba, R., Adewale, T.M. and Abubakar, I.S. (2016) Surgical Management of Uterine Fibroids at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital. Nigerian Journal of Basic and Clinical Sciences, 13, 50-54.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131274-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Omakanye, L.O., Ibrahim, S., Olatinwo, A.O., Durowade, K.A., Biliaminu, S.A. and Salaudeen, G.A. (2017) Female Factors Infertility: Laparoscopic Evaluation at a Public Health Facility in Ilorin, Nigeria. Indian Journal of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research, 10, 298-302. https://doi.org/10.4103/kleuhsj.ijhs_503_16</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131274-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Awoyesuku, P.A., Macpepple, D.A., Altraide, B.O. and John, D.H. (2020) Reviews of Gynaecological Diagnosis and Surgeries Performed at a Tertiary Health Facility in Niger-Delta of Nigeria from 2012-2017. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research, 32, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.9734/jammr/2020/v32i230361</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131274-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elugwaraonu, O., Okojie, A.I.O., Okhia, O. and Oyadoghan, G.P. (2013) The Incidence of Uterine Fibroid Among Reproductive Age Women: A Five-Year Review of Cases at ISTH, Irrua, Edo, Nigeria. International Journal of Basic, Applied and Innovative Research, 2, 55-60.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131274-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ezeama, C.O., Ikechebelu, J.I., Obiechina, N.J. and Ezeama, N.N. (2012) Clinical Presentation of Uterine Fibroids in Nnewi, Nigeria: A 5-year Review. Annals of Medical and Health Science Research, 2, 114-118.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131274-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yakasai, I.A., Ibrahim, S.A., Abubakar, I.S., Ayyuba, R., Mohammed, A.D. and Gajida, A.U. (2014) Surgical Procedures in Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of a Teaching Hospital in Northern Nigeria: A 5-Year Review. Archives of International Surgery, 4, 104-107. https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-9596.143088</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131274-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ndububa, V.I. (2016) Uterine Fibroids: Experience with 100 Myomectomies in Orlu, Southeast Nigeria. Port Harcourt Medical Journal, 10, 124-129. 
https://doi.org/10.4103/0795-3038.197753</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131274-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nnang Essone, J., Ovono Abessolo, F., Tsagoulela, A., Edjo Nkhilli, G., Assoumou, P., Bang Ntamack, J., Anyunzok, E., Minkobame, U., Meye, J. and Ngou Milama, E. (2019) Uterine Reperfusion Ischemia and Use of Elastic Tourniquet. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 7, 98-119. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2019.72009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131274-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jirge, P. (2011) Ovarian Reserve Tests. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 4, 108-113. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.92283</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131274-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Farag</surname><given-names> M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2020</year>)<article-title>Abdominal Myomectomy and Ovarian Reserve in Women at Childbearing Period</article-title><source> Medical Journal of Cairo University</source><volume> 1</volume>,<fpage> 311</fpage>-<lpage>318</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131274-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mehdizadehkashi, A., Tahermanesh, K., Rokhgireh, S., Astaraei, V., Najmi, Z., Rakhshande, M., et al. (2020) Uterine Isthmus Tourniquet during Abdominal Myomectomy: Support or Hazard? A Randomized Double-Blind Trial. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 85, 396-404. https://doi.org/10.1159/000510512</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131274-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aharon, D., Sekhon, L., Lee, J.A., Naert, M., Kerr, A., Ascher-Walsh, C. and Copperman, A.B. (2019) A Longitudinal Assessment of Ovarian Reserve after Myomectomy. Fertility and Sterility, 112, e83.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.337</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131274-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sanders, A.P., Chan, W.V., Tang, J. and Murji, A. (2019) Surgical Outcomes after Uterine Artery Occlusion at the Time of Myomectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 111, 816-827. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.12.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131274-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Qu, X., Cheng, Z., Yang, W., Xu, L., Dai, H. and Hu, L. (2010) Controlled Clinical Trial Assessing the Effect of Laparoscopic Uterine Arterial Occlusion on Ovarian Reserve. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 17, 47-52. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2009.10.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131274-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, W.H, Huang, K.H. and Kung, F.T. (2020) Effects of Uterine Artery Occlusion during Myomectomy on Ovarian Reserve: Serial Follow-up of Sex Hormone Levels, Ultrasound Parameters and Doppler Characteristics. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 46, 752-758. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.14236</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131274-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Browne, H.N., Nieman, L., Williams, T., Wei, Q., Spies, J. and Armstrong, A. (2008) Myomectomy May Decrease AMH Levels: A Pilot Study. Fertility and Sterility, 90, S473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.172</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131274-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Migahed, L., Himaya, E., Antaki, R., Bissonnette, F., Kadoch, I.J., Menard, S, et al. (2014) Variation of Anti-Mullerian Hormone Levels Following Myomectomy by Laparotomy. Fertility and Sterility, 10, e299.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131274-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Farag, M. (2020) Abdominal Myomectomy and Ovarian Reserve in Women at Childbearing Period. The Medical Journal of Cairo University, 1, 311-318. 
https://doi.org/10.21608/mjcu.2020.93992</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131274-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, H.Y., Quan, S., Zhang, R.L., Ye, H.Y., Bi, Y.L., Jiang, Z.M., et al. (2013) Comparison of Serum Anti-Mullerian Hormone Levels Following Hysterectomy and Myomectomy for Benign Gynaecological Conditions. European Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 171, 368-371.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.09.043</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131274-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bulat</surname><given-names> A.M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2020</year>)<article-title>Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Ovaries</article-title><source> MedEspera</source><volume> 8</volume>,<fpage> 270</fpage>-<lpage>271</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>