Di?erent Ba?e designs usable in cylindrical and elliptical storage tanks carried by trucks often used for transporting inflammable liquid materials in Cameroon are investigated to evaluate their safest fluid sloshing damping response during emergency braking where the magnitude of sloshing waves are the greatest. The uncontrolled fluid sloshing creates thrust on the walls of the tanks usually felt externally on the truck carrying the tank and capable of hindering driver’s effort to maintain steer ability and improve on safety during critical braking moments. The study first passes through COMSOL, to expose the safest margin of each Ba?e type at instantaneous fluid pressure wave propagation initiated at a single phase to reflect sloshing in the storage tank during an emergency braking by the truck carrying the tank. The vivid results can be seen in the domain of Acoustic Iso-surface Pressure response; but also acoustic Pressure and Sound pressure response are seen automatically. Secondly, through an experimental finding in which fluid is forced to pass through each Ba?e and the resistance to fluid flow is a measured as it’s the Ba?e’s damping ability. Either, the fluid is lost through the Ba?e and by determination of the surface load exerted on each Ba?e due to the reaction of the residual fluid acting on the surface of each Ba?e after some of it is Lost, the individual sloshing damping abilities are exposed. By comparing the Experimental outcome with the computational response obtained, an ideal Ba?e design is proposed for cylindrical and elliptical tanks and considered to respond to abrupt braking more e?ciently. The application of the Baffle designs with an average multiple holes rather than the usual face centered proved to be more e?cient in fluid sloshing as they provide a more uniformly distributed damping pressure during fluid sloshing in the tank thereby reducing the magnitude of forward thrust that can be created by the conventional Ba?e type during emergency braking hence contributing to improving safety. Mindful of the human, material and environmental damages that an accident involving mobile petroleum storage tanks can course, this study is therefore of great significance for design optimization by petroleum storage tank manufacturing companies in Cameroon.
The phenomenon of fluid sloshing in mobile storage tanks can be described as a periodic motion of a free surface in partially filled tanks which can be caused by dynamic pitching movements (accelerations and deceleration), rolling seen during cornering or when one side of the vehicle enters a pothole or meet a pump, yawing noticed when a vehicle carrying the storage tank move about the center of gravity may be due to road slip and in a lesser extend Material drainage and cutoff processes. All these phenomena enhance sloshing and this sloshing exerts pressure on the walls of the tank including the baffles such that if enormous, like in the case of an emergency braking, they can create a heavier external thrust on the vehicle which is considered to reduce the ability to maneuvering the vehicle by the driver at that critical moment were safety is needed. The effects of sloshing forces in a tank being towed and on trailers having articulation joints cannot be underestimated. Fluid motion can persist beyond the application of a direct load to the container; the inertial load exerted by the fluid is time-dependent and can be greater than the load exerted by a solid of the same mass. This makes analysis of sloshing very important for mobile storage tanks.
Tanks of different shapes have been used to transport inflammable materials but most common are the cylindrical and elliptical carried horizontally. Be it a truck mounted with an anti-lock braking system (ABS) and electronic stability control system (ESC) working properly, sloshing will still be felt and even more when partially filled. Abrupt deceleration causes the fluid to move to the front of the tank in the direction of forward movement due to momentum. In any unfortunate case of accident, this can be very catastrophic particularly when the tank is occupied by Petroleum volatile inflammable products. History has recorded many accidents linked to trucks carrying tanks in Cameroon. Some include the Yaounde train accidents of 14 February 1998 [
According to the statistics in
| Enrollment in local colleges, 2005 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Year | Number of Cases | Number died |
| 2019 | 165,407 | 1290 |
| 2020 | 162,507 | 930 |
| 2021 | 43,453 | 200 |
| 2022 | 11,622 | 372 |
Source: MINSANTE (Ministry of Public Health).
Source: SED (Ministry of Defense).
Source: DGSN (National Delegation of Security).
security (DGSN and SED) in Cameroon [
Generally, sloshing waves are initiated in storage tanks by responding through a reaction to an action. The intensity of the response is usually directly proportional to the action particularly if nothing is done in the pathway of the volume of fluid to reduce the reaction as it passes through toward the next surrounding walls. On trucks transporting storage tanks incompletely filled with liquid the effects of this phenomenon may increase during abrupt braking or collision. Baffles are placed inside these tanks to dampen sloshing effects of the fluid and minimize the tendency to create unwanted thrust. The greatest dynamic sloshing surging occurs in mobile storage tanks when partially filled with liquid material. In this light the objective of this piece of work is to investigate and propose the ideal Baffle design that will portray the most efficient damping responses in storage tanks carried on trucks used for transporting liquid materials especially petroleum inflammable products across the national roads in Cameroon.
The study of liquid sloshing and Baffles is of great interest to many researchers. Liquid sloshing exploration leads to findings on how the fluid exerts the hydrodynamic forces on the walls of the container and can cause divergence or even damage to the system’s functioning [
Between February 2022 to February 2023, we carried out a vivid investigation during internship and field trips in some major producers of cylindrical and elliptical petroleum tanks in Douala Cameroon where almost all of them are located for data collection and industrial experience in petroleum companies in Cameroon. Some of them include the Cameroon Ship Yard (CHANTIER NAVAL), HORIZONE 7, COMETAL SA and METALUX Sarl. By reviewing the design presentation of the baffle implemented in the interior of the tanks by these companies the results were similar all over and
In this configuration noted how each Baffle has a parabolic shape with one centralized large hole, one rectangular hole at the bottom and sometimes at the top too. In some cases where I was not allowed to take images, the Baffle design was simply plain surfaces having the same hole patterns as the parabolic type.
Much documentation has been recorded concerning Baffles in storage tanks involving analytic, computerized simulations and experimental approaches. Most of the works on horizontal cylinders are focused on the Eigenvalue sloshing problem, [
and elliptical storage tanks used for transporting petroleum products by heavy-duty transport vehicles have been very indispensable ever since petroleum was discovered. A petroleum-carrying storage tank is a medium for storing and transporting materials most often Liquid material. They are a variety of tank shapes but often the circular and elliptical with Baffles insides are commonly mounted on the Automobile chassis to transport liquid materials. The potentials of Baffles in increasing the hydrodynamic damping of sloshing in circular-cylindrical storage tanks has been investigated [
There are usually many regulations applied to the design and operation of storage tanks, often depending on the nature of the material it contains. Based on the widespread use of baffles in moving liquid containers, the ability of Baffles to reduce the sloshing effects in storage tanks that are especially broader than fuel containers was under question.
In a more extended study [
According to Amir and Suhash [
The regenerative braking force according to Martellucci, L. and Giannini, M. [
An estimation on the effect of wheel braking of heavy trucks (13 and 20 tons per axle) on the deformations observed in the braking zones (traffic lights, roundabouts) was conducted by [
Most dynamic sloshing and surging occur in mobile storage tanks carried on Lorries particularly when partially filled with fluid [
The momentum created by these behaviors increases the uncontrollability of the driver thereby increasing the risk of accidents, disasters and failures. Furthermore, Most storage tanks with perforated holes on the Baffle experience some sort of fluid flow phenomenon. The passage of fluid through the Baffles from one compartment to another during sloshing wave is via the hole which leads to the understanding of fluid presentation at a given moving speed after the Baffle in relation to Renaults number.
(Re) given by:
Re = σ v D μ (1)
where:
ρ = Density of Fluid
v = speed of fluid flow
D = Diameter of hole
μ = dynamic viscosity index
A section of a hole viewed at microscopic level is a cylinder or pipe and therefore, depending on the finishing aspect inside the walls of the hole and the speed of fluid flow, it is possible to get turbulence if the Renaults number (Re) is greater than 4000 or Transitional if the Re lies between 2300 - 4000, and laminar if Re is less than 2300 [
While designing any new vessel and equipment, the creators have to keep many things in mind. Before starting the design of these vessels, the engineers have to check their design pressure. After completing the design, they have to check for maximum allowable working pressure (MAWP) and maximum allowable operating pressure (MAOP) [
Before calculating for MAWP, process engineers need to determine the size, shape, and required psi of a vessel, as well as the physical properties of the desired metal alloy. By doing so, the vessel can be constructed with the right structural materials and thickness to meet the calculated MAWP. Alternatively, the MAWP can be calculated for a variety of standard pressure vessels so the right vessel can be selected and added to an industrial facility system.
Once MAWP is determined, the vessel is hydrotested i.e., filled with pressurized water at the established MAWP to verify that the vessel can handle the pressure.
The American Society for Mechanical Engineers [
P = σ t E R s (2)
whereby:
P = Maximum allowable working pressure (in Pa)
σ = tensile strength of the material in the weakest part of the vessel (in psi)
t = Vessel’s wall thickness (in mm)
E = Longitudinal seam efficiency, or efficiency of the weld based on a set rating R = Interior radius of the vessel (in mm)
s = Safety factor
Mindful of the fact that the maximum speed limit for trucks in Cameroon is 60 km/h, it is estimated that a truck carrying a storage tank moving at this speed and carrying its maximum allowable load can take at least 5 seconds to come to a standstill during an emergency braking given that all favorable conditions are applied including good road quality, functional ABS and steadily applied braking. During such instances, fluid sloshing intensifies and the unsafe working pressure in the tank is approached particularly if it is partially filled.
The focus here is to expose the safest margin of each Baffle type at instantaneous fluid pressure wave propagation initiated at a single phase to reflect sloshing in the storage tank during emergency braking where an unsafe working pressure can be experienced by the Truck carrying the tank. The vivid results seen in the domain of Acoustic Iso-surface Pressure response; but also Acoustic Pressure and Acoustic Sound pressure response are seen automatically. Problem of partially filled tank necessity that we have to take the combination of fluid plus the structure in which it is filled thus making the problem purely Fluid and structure interaction. This type of problem can be modeled in basic four approaches [
The application of COMSOL to sort out these findings makes use of the main parametric model of acoustics in the frequency domain the Helmholtz equation. The model involved is the cylindrical and elliptical storage tanks with their geometries presented below (
Because the Helmholtz PDE is a time independent PDE it can be solved more efficiently compared to the time dependent wave equation used for modeling acoustics in the time domain. The Helmholtz equation is, however, only applicable when modeling acoustic systems which have a harmonic time dependency.
All these analyses are based on the Helmholtz PDE model in conjunction with various types of boundary conditions. The provision of a time harmonic analysis let to the computing of the frequency response of an acoustic system over a range of frequencies for different baffle configurations. Note should be taken that an eigenfrequency analysis is applied to solve for the eigenmodes and eigenfrequencies of an acoustic system. The designing of the various Baffles for the cylindrical tank was with respect to a parametric study carried out by Abbas and Ziyaeifar (16) which led to the uprising of the following partitioning on various circular Baffle. (
On the other hand, the various Baffle designs placed under study in the elliptical tank were obtained through design modeling and testing on the software while considering the surface area and structural rigidity performance to obtain optimal performance. The model below was considered, then by eliminating one hole at a time the remaining surface structure was simulated. (
Acoustic pressure is the main quantity that characterizes acoustic fields since most acoustic-sensitive items such as the ear are pressure sensitive. The pressure-wave propagation in a tank is a measure of sloshing dynamics phenomena in the tanks. The approach is general for analysis of damping of harmonic pressure waves. The test model involved here is geometry consisting of three separate chambers divided by Baffles. The inlet and the outlet correspond to the movement of fluid during braking due to the force of inertia and in connection to the direction of movement of the vehicle carrying the tank.
The behavior of an acoustic system in the frequency domain is investigated by repetitively solving the Helmholtz PDE for a specific frequency out of a frequency range of interest. The Helmholtz equation is used for modeling a harmonic sound pressure field at a specific angular frequency ω:
∇ ⋅ { − 1 ρ ( ∇ p ( x ) + F ) } − ω 2 ρ c 2 ( x ) = 0 (3)
The Helmholtz equation is derived from the wave equation with harmonic time-dependence.
Here the terms Q(t, X) and F(t, X) are monopole and dipole sources, respectively.
Thus, if a sound pressure field is assumed to be time-harmonic, the pressure variation in time for a particular frequency ω can be expressed in the complex plane by an amplitude function p(X) such that:
p ( t , X ) = p ( X ) e i w t
Likewise, the monopole and dipole sources can be expressed by amplitude functions Q(X) and F(X), respectively:
p ( t , X ) = Q ( t , X ) e i w t
F ( t , X ) = F ( X ) e i w t
Taking the second order time derivative of (1) gives:
∂ 2 p ( t , X ) ∂ t 2 = ∇ p ( X ) e i w t (4)
Taking the gradient yields to
∇ p ( t , X ) = ∇ p ( X ) e i w t
1 p c 2 ∂ 2 p ( t , X ) ∂ t 2 + ∇ ⋅ { − 1 ρ ( ∇ p ( t , X ) + F ( t , X ) ) } + Q ( t , X ) (5)
Thus inserting the above in the main equations gives
∇ ⋅ { − 1 ρ ∇ p ( X ) e i w t } − ω 2 ρ c 2 ( x ) e i w t = Q ( X ) e i w t (6)
Factor out the common term then the equation simplifies to the time-independent, inhomogeneous Helmholtz equation as follows:
∇ ⋅ { − 1 ρ ( ∇ p ( X ) + F ) } − ω 2 ρ c 2 ( x ) e i w t = Q (7)
The dependent variable in the Helmholtz equation is the sound pressure p. The sound pressure wave is propagating in a medium with density at the speed of sound c. The sound pressure field is modeled in response to a harmonic sound stimulus at a frequency f, which is related to the angular frequency ω by:
p ( X ) = ω 2 π . Sound pressure can be understood as the local pressure deviation
from an ambient reference pressure: p(X) = Pmedium(X) – Preference where X denotes the position vector. Terms Q and F represent monopole and dipole sources, respectively.
In solving problems in the frequency domain using the Pressure Acoustics interface in COMSOL software, the model equation is a slightly modified Helmholtz equation for the acoustic pressure, p
∇ ⋅ ∇ p ρ − ω 2 p c s 2 = 0 (8)
where ρ is the density, cs is the speed of sound, and ω is the angular frequency. The density needs to be included in the equation in cases where variations in density in different materials exist. The model assumes that in the low-frequency range, reactive damping prevails. Resistive damping is therefore not included.
The boundary conditions are of three different types. At all the solid boundaries, which include the outer walls of the tank, the dividing walls between the resonator baffles, and the walls of the perforated holes, sound-hard (wall) boundary conditions are used. This is such that:
( − ∇ p ρ ) ⋅ n = 0 (9)
At the inlet boundary is a combination of incoming and outgoing plane waves
( − ∇ p ρ ) ⋅ n = i ω ρ c s p − 2 i ω ρ c s p 0 = 0 (10)
In this equation, p0 denotes the applied outer pressure and i the imaginary unit. At the outlet boundary, an outgoing plane wave is set.
( − ∇ p ρ ) ⋅ n = i ω ρ c s p (11)
This above scientific analysis has led to many studies to bring about improvement on its development and use. One of them is the following results to amelioration tank interior designs with the target part of the tanks to be studied critically being the baffle designs placed in the tanks to improve on its functionality.
The simulation results presented in this section are based on the solution of the truncated systems built in the air. The same test was conducted for fluids like water and liquid petroleum products embedded in the COMSOL software configuration [
The eigenvalue problem is considered first with respect to Sloshing Frequencies, Modes, and Masses, the frequency is at 1000 Hz. Thus assuming there is no external excitation. The convergence rate and the expected accuracy of the eigenvalues are demonstrated numerically [
The following images (Figures 9-20) are the results of the computerized study.
Here more attention should be on the iso-surface pressure results shown on bottom left hand and the graph of lost with respect to sloshing responds for each configurations of holes on the Baffle shown on the bottom right of each image.
For the cylindrical storage tank, the Baffle with average perforations (4 to 7 holes with respect percentage of material off-cutting recommended in
Mindful of the fact that for every sloshing environment, there is a force exerted on the surface of the Baffle, the aim of this area of study is to experimentally determine the magnitude of sloshing on different Baffle configurations through the measurement of FLUID LOST ability for a given Baffle. Obviously, from a layman’s point of view, if the Baffle is simply made without any hole and placed in a test tunnel or tank where fluid is made to pass, the flow will be blocked completely then they will be no Lost of fluid. But if there is a broken-out section or hole on the Baffle and placed in the same test tank then during functionality, fluid will pass through the hole, hence there will be losses and depending on the type of baffle design the fluid lost will vary. In this line of thoughts the fluid flow ability equated to be sloshing effects can be measured.
The specifications here are for the Storage tanks of inflammable and non-flammable, materials that are harmful to the environment when out of control. The material should have a density of 1.1 kg/dm3 for EN 12285 class A and up to 1.9 kg/dm3 for tanks EN 12285 class B and DIN6616. This extract of information serves as a guide to the realization of a usable storage tank. Other technical specifications include:
– Design according to EN 12285-2 class A or B or according to DIN6616
– Technical documentation approved by Notified Body
– Basic material – S235JR according to EN10025-1
– Single or multi-chamber tank
– Working pressure: max 0.5 bar
– Working temperature: from −20 degrees Celsius to + 50 degrees Celsius
As mentioned earlier, all Tanks must be tested after manufacturing. The values
in
Thus in a more summarize manner, Storage tanks applicable to this domain of study are classified with respect to their Designation, classes and working pressures. The table below (
Abrasive grit-blasted to grade Sa 2.5 according to PN-ISO 8501-1 and painted in C3 standard or higher.
Manhole DN600 with gasket Steel supports for EN-tanks: 1.9 N/mm2 for DIN 6616-tanks 0.15 N/mm2 transport grips ladder, platform, railing Filling pipe, suction pipe, venting pipe
– Overfill valve, venting valve, de-watering pipe
– System and control pipes
– Contents measuring
With the help of a prototype experimental tank with a reduction in scale of up to 0.01 and taking into consideration the corresponding equality of dimensions used the various Baffles used in the computerized studies seen in the chapter above, the evaluation of the sloshing phenomenon in the presence of different Baffles has been reached. The figure below is a representation of the Experimental setup.
The design involves two particular components to facilitate the outcome of the experiment. The first is the prototype tank opened on both ends, having a sit for the baffles to be mounted and a close to frictionless sliding mechanism to facilitate the free longitudinal displacement of the Baffle along the tank.
This mechanism also carries the pulley to relay the slightest displacement of
| Measures & weight [ca] | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Values | Diameters | Length | Manhole | Weights | Supports | Well thickness | Lifting hugs | Strength ring | |||||||||
| Class A | Class B | Class A | Class B | Class A | Class B | ||||||||||||
| V | Or | Lo | DN | G | G | F | N | K | F | N | K | S1 | S2 | S1 | S2 | T80 | |
| [m2] | [mm] | [mm] | [mm] | [kg] | [kg] | [mm] | [mm] | [mm] | [mm] | [mm] | [mm] | [mm] | [mm] | [mm] | [mm] | [pcs] | [pcs] |
| 3 | 1600 | 2040 | 600 | 946 | 1020 | 700 | 150 | 1600 | 950 | 350 | 2 | - | |||||
| 5 | 1600 | 3040 | 1266 | 1340 | 1700 | 1950 | 2 | - | |||||||||
| 7 | 1600 | 3840 | 1518 | 1590 | 2500 | 2750 | 2 | - | |||||||||
| 10 | 1600 | 5540 | 2051 | 2126 | 4200 | 4450 | 2 | - | |||||||||
| 13 | 1600 | 7040 | 2513 | 2592 | 5700 | 5950 | 2 | - | |||||||||
| 16 | 1600 | 8540 | 2992 | 3069 | 7200 | 7450 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |||||
| 10 | 2000 | 3660 | 600 | 2143 | 2335 | 2000 | 200 | 2000 | 2200 | 600 | 2 | 1 | |||||
| 13 | 2000 | 4660 | 2588 | 2780 | 3000 | 3200 | 2 | - | |||||||||
| 16 | 2000 | 5660 | 3044 | 3237 | 4000 | 4200 | 2 | - | |||||||||
| 20 | 2000 | 6810 | 3567 | 3761 | 5150 | 5350 | 2 | - | |||||||||
| 25 | 2000 | 8660 | 4394 | 4588 | 7000 | 7200 | 2 | - | |||||||||
| 30 | 2000 | 10,160 | 5133 | 5328 | 8500 | 8700 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||
| 36 | 2000 | 11,960 | 5943 | 6138 | 10,300 | 10,500 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |||||
| 20 | 2500 | 4800 | 600 | 3838 | 4653 | 2750 | 250 | 2500 | 2850 | 950 | 2 | - | |||||
| 25 | 2500 | 5800 | 4456 | 5335 | 3750 | 3850 | 2 | - | |||||||||
| 30 | 2500 | 6800 | 5068 | 6010 | 4750 | 4850 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||
| 40 | 2500 | 8800 | 6373 | 7442 | 6750 | 6850 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||
| 50 | 2500 | 10,800 | 7599 | 8796 | 8750 | 8850 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||
| 60 | 2500 | 12,800 | 8915 | 10,239 | 10,750 | 10,850 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
| 70 | 2500 | 14,800 | 10,136 | 11,586 | 12,750 | 12,850 | 6 | 4/5 | 7 | 4/5 | 2 | 2 | |||||
| 40 | 2900 | 6900 | 600 | 6722 | 9016 | 4550 | 300 | 2900 | 4450 | 1350 | 2 | 1 | |||||
| 50 | 2900 | 8400 | 7990 | 10,504 | 6050 | 5950 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||
| 60 | 2900 | 9900 | 9175 | 11,909 | 7550 | 7450 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||
| 70 | 2900 | 11,400 | 10,347 | 13,301 | 9050 | 8950 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||
| 80 | 2900 | 12,900 | 11,612 | 14,786 | 10,550 | 10,450 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||
| 100 | 2900 | 15,900 | 13,974 | 17,588 | 13,550 | 13,450 | 7 | 4/5 | 9 | 4/5 | 4 | 2 | |||||
| Designation | Class | Working Pressure |
|---|---|---|
| EN 12285-2 | Class A | 0.3 bar/0.4 bar |
| EN 12285-2 | Class B | 2.0 bar/0.6 bar |
| DIN 6618 | - | 2.0 bar/0.6 bar |
the baffle to a lever articulated at the middle and the other extreme acts on the measuring scale. The second is 230 V a.c ROYAL Fan with speed one set at 600 rpm, speed reaching 1200 rpm and speed at 1800 rpm all at 60 Hz.
NB: For this experiment and for the purpose of accuracy, only speed two and three were used. This is because according to the graph of the fan’s torque characteristics as seen below, while at the first speed, the response was not optimal to be considered (
Generally, the test Baffles samples are of thickness 0.08 mm with an external major diameter of 20.5 mm. Any other section removed from each baffle is in percentage with respect to the total surface area. The functionality of the system is in correspondence to the pictorial view of the final setup as seen below in
During operation, the following step are taken:
1) The baffle is mounted on its sitting while tht making sure it does not touch the walls of the test tank.
2) Carefully verify and adjust the tension of the twin on the pulley.
3) Put on the fan at speed 2 and wait for 10 seconds for it to reach its maximum allowable rotation, then record the corresponding weight exerted on the scale and switch to speed three to record the corresponding weight too.
4) Switch on the fan and repeat the process for every baffle design.
The following cylindrical and elliptical samples presented in
The measurement of the resistance to fluid flow per baffle design is equated at LOSS. Knowing that the purpose of a Baffle in a tank is to dampen sloshing. There
is therefore an ideal baffle design to provide an optimal sloshing response such that it is not too much nor too little. In this elaboration, a sample baffle that has a greater measurement value for LOSS in terms of grams on the scale indicates or means that it acts more like a resistance thus dampening ability is high and when
applicable in the industry the fluid sloshing action will create a high reaction and it is dangerous particularly during Braking.
Conversely, if the sample baffle that has a lesser measurement value in grams on the scale it shows that it has less resistance thus its dampening ability is too low and when put into use, the sloshing action will not be felt leading to unwanted thrust on the baffles or the entire tank walls and still dangerous. The resulting graphs (Figures 26-30) for the various test conducted are as seen below.
Mindful of how dangerous petroleum material can be if poorly handled we are looking at improvement on safety during emergency braking by elaborating on the effectiveness of various Baffle designs usable in storage tanks for transporting petroleum products when it comes to damping sloshing waves. This study therefore compares computerized and experimental investigation for cylindrical and elliptical storage tanks used for transporting petroleum products by trucks. The particular attention here is on vertical placed Baffles with variety of perforated designs placed under pressure acoustic iso-surface loss for the computerized study and hydrodynamic loss of fluid during sloshing with respect to each Baffled for the experimental case study. Both are a check for the effectives of damping during approximated during emergency braking excitation where we have critical fluid sloshing. This is in line with predicting the best design construction suitable for future application. The result obtained within a safe working pressure margin shows that the conventional type with one central large hole and a small opening at the bottom does not prove to be very effective in damping sloshing; neither is the Baffle with many perforations. The designs with an average multiple holes rather than the usual face-centered are more efficient in fluid sloshing particularly during braking. The application of these designs provides a uniformly distributed damping during fluid sloshing in the tank thereby reducing the magnitude of forward thrust that can be created by the conventional Baffle type during emergency braking which sometimes sways the truck carrying the container to unwanted directions against the will of the driver and thus improving on safety.
This research received no external funding.
This research was partly Facilitated by:
– The Management of HORIZONE 7 Bonaberi Douala and
– The Ministry of transport in Partnership with the Ministry National security Yaounde-Cameroon
– The Mechanical Engineering Department of IUT Banjun
All data used in this article are freely available.
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Ayiehfor, C.M. (2024) The Effects of Fluid Sloshing on Different Baffle Configurations in Storage Tanks Transported on Trucks during an Emergency Braking. Open Journal of Fluid Dynamics, 14, 24-63. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojfd.2024.141002