The Protein target of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) type 1 fimbrial (FimH) lectin domain in complex with mannose C-linked to quinolone was retrieved from the Protein Data Bank (PDB ID 8BVD) (https://www.rcsb.org/) (Figure 1) [23] . The targeted macromolecule was obtained using the X-ray diffraction method with a resolution of 3.00 Å, R-value free of 0.303, and R-value work of 0.251, which gives the molecule good quality with high resolution [24] . UPEC type 1 FimH complex molecules are attractive alternatives to antibiotic treatments and preventive measures against acute or recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) [25] [26] . Ucsf Chimera software was used to prepare protein receptors by removing the unwanted ligand and solvent molecules from the 8BVD target, eliminating the alternative location of residues, changing selenomethionines to methionines, adding hydrogen atoms, and assigning charges to

the protein atoms [27] . The ligand coordinates for site-specific docking were assigned, for the center at X: 26, Y: 58, Z: −9, and for a box of dimension X: 13, Y: 7, Z: 10. The prepared protein receptor was saved in a mol 2 file ready for docking.

The natural compounds of aloe vera (aloe barbadensis miller) were retrieved from an accessible commercial PubChem library (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) (Figure 2). Ucsf Chimera software was used to prepare the ligands by optimizing it as equal to the protein was optimized and saved as mol 2 in the working directorate [28] .

Molecular docking was performed in the Ucsf chimera by selecting the protein receptor, minimizing the ligands saved in the mol2 file, and opening them in the Auto Dock Vina window. The receptor and ligand were selected as outputs, and the coordinates for the center and the size for site-specific docking were generated in the boxes. The executable location path for the vina and vina splits was set and docking was performed.

The physicochemical properties of a drug play a significant role in determining its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, which are essential for increasing a drug candidate’s chances of success during the preclinical development process [29] . Drug candidates fail in clinical trials for a variety of reasons, but the two main reasons are undesirable pharmacokinetic characteristics and unacceptable toxicity [30] . Therefore, it is essential for scholars to select candidates with the correct balance of potency, absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) [31] . In contrast, pharmacokinetics are undoubtedly caused in part by the inhibition of these isoenzymes (CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP1A2, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4). Because of the decreased

clearance and accumulation of the drug or its metabolites, related drug-drug interactions may produce toxic or other negative side effects. The compounds used in this study were assessed: pharmacokinetic (pk), physicochemical, drug-Likeness and ADMET prediction using pkCSM and SwissADME web tools [32] [33] .

Drug likenesses are quickly assessed by using bioavailability radar, in this case, six physiochemical parameters like lipophilicity, size, polarity, solubility, flexibility, and saturation were considered [34] . Comprehensive and truthful tests were performed using SwissADME software.

Molecular dynamics (MD) are frequently used to study large molecules like proteins which can be utilized to ascertain conformational space [35] . In this case, molecular dynamics was performed to examine the actual motion of atoms, which aids in understanding the detailed interaction of 8BVD with potential phytochemicals, especially when it binds to a protein target [36] . Several biological activities and intricate dynamic processes have not been identified by observing the internal dynamics of proteins [37] . The GROMACS (gmx 2023. 1) software was used to perform molecular dynamics simulations on 8BVD-CID5318998, 8BVD-CID 5320385, 8BVD-CID 5320386, and 8BVD-CID 33613 at 300 K with a CHARMM27 force field, and the hybrid ligand structure and force field properties of the chosen ligand were determined using SwissParam [38] .

Free 8BVD, 8BVD-CID5318998, 8BVD-CID5320385, 8BVD-CID5320386, and 8BVD-CID 33613 were solvated with water in a cubic box with a basic diameter of 1 nm with all default settings. The temperature of the entire system was increased from 0 to 300 K during the length of the equilibration time (1000ps) while maintaining a steady volume and periodic boundary conditions, and the system was then reduced using the 1000 sharpest decline steps. The generated trajectories were used to assess the behavior of each complex and stability of the overall system. Calculations of the hydrogen bond, root mean square deviation, root mean square fluctuation, radius of gyration, and potential energy were used to examine the variations in the macromolecule and macromolecule-ligand complex system [39] . The number of particles, system volume and temperature (NVT) ensemble, number of particles, system pressure, and temperature (NPT) ensemble were used to separate the equilibration process into two phases. While all the other atoms were allowed to move freely in both NVT and NPT, the C backbone atoms of the original structures were constrained. Molecular dynamics (MD) was then run at 300 K with a 20 ns time frame. The trajectories obtained were examined using the GROMACS analysis modules. UCF Chimera and Maestro were used to visualize MD movies and interaction diagrams, respectively [40] .

Molecular docking scores for licochalcone A, palmidin B, palmidin C and Amoxicillin presented in (Table 1), the scores revealed that licochalcone A ligand has the lowermost binding affinity toward the 8BVD target. A lower docking score indicates that ligand and target binding are more stable. The different structures bound to the target caused variations in ligand-target interactions (Figure 3), which led to different docking scores [41] . Small molecules of licochalcone A have been reported as potential lead drugs for the treatment of bacterial infections [42] .

The poses for each ligand-target interaction were compared to perform visual analysis. The protein-active sites were designed to accommodate ligand interactions. At first, the analysis of the licochalcone-target, in which its 2D projection

interaction is shown in Figure 4(a), was discussed. One OH group in licochalcone A ligand form hydrogen bonds with protein residues Asp47 and Asp54. In this case licochalcone A acts as a hydrogen donor to the polar residues Asp54 whereas it acts as an acceptor to the amino acid residues Asp47.The bond formed here is somewhat complicated, where licochalcone A acts as a hydrogen donor and acceptor simultaneously. It also form hydrophobic interaction with Tyr49 amino acid residues.

The second pose is the palmidin B-target interaction, as shown in Figure 4(b). The figure displays that Palmidin B forms three OH groups in the form of hydrogen bonds with Asp47, Asp54, Asn46, Phe1, G1n33 and Asp140. In this case, the Asp140 and Asn54 polar residues acts as a hydrogen acceptor, while the amino acid residues Asp47, Asn46, Gln33 and Phe1 act as donors to palmidin B oxygen atoms. It is estimated that the docking score of palmidin B is more positive than that of licochalcone A owing to the interaction of two hydrogen bonds with the Asp140 polar residue. On the other hand, palmidin B form hydrophobic interaction with Tyr137polar residue.

The third pose is palmidin C-target interaction, as shown in Figure 4(c). The figure clarifies that palmidin C forms one OH group in the form of a hydrogen bond with Asp140, Asn135 and Gln133. In this case, the Asp140 polar residue acts as a hydrogen bond acceptor, whereas Asn135 and Gln133 acts as a donor to

a palmidin C oxygen atom. The ligand also exhibited hydrophobic interaction with Tyr137 polar residue. Inthis situation, the docking score of palmidin C seems to be more negative than that of palmidin B.

The fourth pose is the amoxicillin-target interaction, as shown in Figure 4(d). This figure indicates that amoxicillin forms one OH group in the form of a hydrogen bond with Asp54, Asn135, Gln133 and an oxygen bond with Tyr137. In this case, the Asn135, and Gln133 polar residue acts as a hydrogen donor while Asp54 act as hydrogen bond acceptor. Similarly, Tyr137 residues act as donor to amoxicillin oxygen atom. In this phenomenon, amoxicillin appears to be less negative than palmidin C compound.

In general, the complexity of protein-ligand interactions determines the strength of molecular docking (Figure 3) [43] . Licochalcone A forms hydrogen bonds with protein residues Asp47 and Asp54 which are more complex than those of palmidin B, which has three hydrogen bonds with Asp47, Asp54, Asn46, Phe1, G1n33, and Asp140, this ligand interacted with many residues compared to licochalcone A, Palmidin C and amoxicillin which formed a single hydrogen bond with Asp140, Asn135, Gln133, Asp54, Asn135 and Gln133, respectively. Nevertheless, the polar residue Tyr137 formed the covalent interaction with oxygen atoms from the amoxicillin drug a situation that made it more complex compared to palmidin C. Therefore, from the visual analysis, the best compound to form a ligand-target interaction was palmidin B, followed by licochalcone A, Palmidin C, and amoxicillin which were endorsed by the protein-ligand interaction docking scores (Table 1).

For a molecule to be considered as a possible therapeutic candidate, it must possess the intended biological functions along with the best possible pharmacokinetics and safety profile [44] . One of the biggest challenges for oral medicine is its ability to cross the intestinal epithelial barrier, which affects the rate and degree of human absorption [45] . The selected compounds have an intestinal absorption rate of more than 89%, which is extremely high (Table 2). The chosen molecules also have non-hepatotoxic qualities, do not act as skin sensitizers, are non-permeable to the Blood Brain Barrier (BBB) and Central Nervous System (CNS), and are negative in AMES toxicity. It can also be reported that all ligands in this assessment permeate colon carcinoma cell 2 (CaCo-2) although Palmidin B, and Palmidin C seems to have a low penetration potential.

For the case of metabolism, the metabolic enzyme cytochrome P450 (CYP450) was tested and analyzed. The results show licochalcone A are potential inhibitors of CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, and CYP1A2 while Palmidin B, and Palmidin C are potential inhibitor of CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 respectively. Toxic risk such as hepatotoxicity was also checked for all ligands, and the results from Table 2 showed that the compounds cannot cause liver injury or impairment. Concerning the assessed results of inhibition of the hERG channel, it was noted that all ligands tested low toxic risk. The drug-likeness and EDMET properties jointly indicated that licochalcone A, Palmidin B, and Palmidin C might be potential candidates for preventing the target related to drug development against UTIs. According to recent data, licochalcone A is a natural flavonoid compound that has demonstrated its potential in the pharmacological aspects, it acts as an antioxidant, antitumor, and anti-inflammatory [46] . It prevents the proliferation

of epithelial carcinoma and mesenchymal sarcoma cells. Palmidin B and palmidin C possess antibacterial, antifungal, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer activities [47] .

The drug-likeness characteristics of an orally accessible, phytochemical medicine are graphically represented by bioavailability radar. The drug-likeness plots are displayed as a hexagon, with each vertex corresponding to a characteristic that describes a bioavailable medication [48] . The comprehensive and truthful tests

of licochalcone A, palmidin B, palmidin C and amoxicillin compounds were performed using swissADMEsoftware [49] .

For a molecule to be classified as drug-like, its radar plot must lie within the colored zone. For each variable, the pink zone indicates the proper range, such as lipophilicity: XLOGP3 range between −0.7 to 5.0, molecular weight (MW) ranges between 150 and 500 g/mol, topological polar surface area (TPSA) ranges between 20 and 130 Ų, solubility: logS less than 6, saturation (INSATU): fraction csp3 hybridization fraction greater than 0.25, and flexibility: less than 9 rotatable bonds (Table 3). Therefore, licochalcone A has oral bioavailability with slight unsaturation, while palmidin B and palmidin C seem to be more unsaturated in sp3 hybridization as a function of the carbon percentage with slight insoluble (Figure 5) [50] .

Molecular dynamics (MD) was performed to examine the actual motion of atoms, which aids in understanding the detailed interaction of 8BVD with potential

phytochemicals, especially when it binds to a protein target [51] . Several non-identified biological activities and intricate dynamic processes can be discovered by observing the internal dynamics of proteins [52] .

The essential component of understanding molecular interactions, especially in biomolecular system, is hydrogen bond investigation. It aids in the comprehension of the nature and strength of hydrogen bonds inside the molecular structures [53] . Hydrogen bond analysis can also be used to examine the strength of the protein-ligand complex to assess the molecular recognition, directionality, and specificity of contacts [54] .

The analysis from Figure 6 showed that licochalcone A formed a maximum of 5-H bonds during the molecular dynamics computation. It formed 1 to 4 hydrogen bonds from 0 to 20 ns. The hydrogen bonds formed between 1 and 3 were the most stable compared with the ones formed between 3 and 5 which had higher fluctuations (Figure 6(a)). The higher electrostatic forces might contribute to the stability of the hydrogen bonds.

Palmidin B formed a maximum of 2 hydrogen bonds during MD simulation. From 0 to 20 ns one (1) hydrogen bond was formed. This was the most stable hydrogen bond of this compound compared with the hydrogen bond formed between 1 and 2 which had higher fluctuations. The fluctuations might be contributed by the high electronegative atoms of this compound (Figure 6(b)).

Palmidin C formed two (2) hydrogen bonds during this computational analysis. In between 0 to 20 ns one (1) hydrogen bond was formed. This hydrogen bond was the most stable compared with the hydrogen bond formed between 1 and 2 which had greater fluctuations (Figure 6(c)).

Amoxicillin formed 7-H bonds during the molecular dynamics computation. 6-H bond was formed from 0 to 5 ns with slight fluctuations while the 4-H bond was formed from 5 to 20 ns with some fluctuations. The hydrogen bond formed from 2 to 3 was the most stable for 20 ns. Principally, all four ligands had good H-bonding with the active pocket 8BVD; however, licochalcone A had the most stable H-bonding compared to other ligands (Figure 6(d)).

The root mean square deviation of each trajectory record for 20000 ps (20 ns) in the MD simulation was calculated with respect to the protein ligand’s initial position to determine the stability of the docked complex [55] .

From the trajectory analysis, licochalcone A appeared to bind more stable with the target molecule at 0.7 nm, although the ligand had slight destabilization at 6.5 ns to 12.5 ns before maintained stability at 0.7 nm from 13 ns up to 20 ns. The mean RMSD for licochalcone A was attained at 0.55 nm. Palmidin B exhibited stability at 1 nm from 0 to 2.5 ns, then fluctuated from 1 up to 5 nm from 2.6 ns to 7.5 ns, then regained stability at 7.5 to 20 ns. The mean value was recorded at 0.83 nm. Palmidin C had better stability compared with Palmidin B, the

ligand binds with the 8BVD target at 1 nm and maintained stability up to 7.5 ns, and then after 7.5 ns the ligand had slight fluctuation from 1 to 0.3 nm and maintained it from 7.5 ns to 17.5 ns. The mean value was observed at 0.53 nm. RMSD for Amoxicillin ligands was stable at 0.75 nm from 0 to 20 ns (Figure 7). Looking at the three ligands, Palmidin C was the most stable compared with other ligands.

RMSF determines the movement of an individual atom or group of atoms from

Figure 7. RMSD for Licochalcone A, Palmidin B, Palmidin C and amoxicillin ligands.

the reference structure across the total number of atoms [55] [56] . It is commonly used to determine if a structure is departing from the initial coordinates or stable within the simulation time scale [56] . It is worthwhile to analyze the time-dependent motions of the structures. To forecast the stable structure, the RMSF was calculated using the GROMACS standard function, and the fluctuations of various atoms were examined for 20 ns.

Analysis of the RMSF shows that the HC5 atom of licochalcone A fluctuated more than the other atoms. The RMSF value of the HC5 atom was 0.25 nm, followed by H22 and HC15, both with RMSF value of 0.23 nm while the H18, atom fluctuated at an RMSF value of 0.22 nm. Those atoms that fluctuated more were at the terminals of the aromatic rings.

The H22 atom of Palmidin B was observed to have the highest fluctuation at an RMSF value of 0.19 nm, followed by HC13 and HC12 with RMSF values of 0.13 and 0.12 nm, respectively while C16, C15, and HC14 exhibited RMSF values of 0.12, nm. The other atoms are stable at an average RMSF value of 0.03 nm.

For the case of Palmidin C, the HC15 atom had a higher fluctuation with an RMSF value of 0.12 nm, followed by HC16, and HC14 atoms with RMSF values of 0.119 nm each. Equally, atoms such as H22, H21, and H19 also fluctuated with RMSF values of 0.10, 0.079 and 0.06 nm, respectively. Other atoms of this ligand were stable at the average RMSF of 0.03 nm.

The HC9 atom of the amoxicillin unveiled higher fluctuation at the RMSF value of 0.14 nm, atoms like HC8, and HC10 had the RMSF value of 0.13 nm each while other atoms such as HC12 and HC19 have an RMSF value of 0.12 nm each. The average RMSF value for the other atoms was recorded at 0.06 nm (Figure 8).

The radius of gyration (Rg) determines the strength of the protein. In the protein-ligand complex, the radius of gyration of a ligand shows the ligand center of gyration to the center of gyration of the protein; therefore, a higher value of the radius of gyration indicates less stability of the structure [57] . The results show

that licochalcone A gyrated at 0.45 nm which is higher compared to the other three ligands. Other ligands like palmidin B, palmidin C, and amoxicillin seem to be stable at the average Rg value of 0.38 nm (Figure 9).

The relative potential energy can be used to compare conformations and configurations of the molecular system. Potential energies of the system of both proteins and ligands were plotted as a function of MD simulation time, and the plots are shown in Figure 10. The results from the plot illustrate that palmidin B is more stable than the other three ligands, with a total energy of −318000 kJ/mol. Licochalcone A, palmidin C and amoxicillin ligands were also stable, with slightly higher energies ranging from −314000 to −308000 KJ/mol (Figure 10).

The lower energy of the trajectory profile indicates that the system was considerably stable throughout the simulation [58] .