<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2024.152008</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-131072</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  How the Flat Space Cosmology Model Correlates the Recombination CMB Temperature of 3000 K with a Redshift of 1100
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Eugene</surname><given-names>Terry Tatum</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>U.</surname><given-names>V. S. Seshavatharam</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>I-SERVE, Hitech City, Hyderabad, India</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Independent Researcher, Bowling Green, Kentucky, USA</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>02</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>174</fpage><lpage>178</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>23,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>3,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2024</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>6,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This paper shows how the Flat Space Cosmology model correlates the recom-bination epoch CMB temperature of 3000 K with a cosmological redshift of 1100. This proof is given in support of the recent publication that the Tatum and Seshavatharam Hubble temperature formulae can be derived using the Stephan-Boltzmann dispersion law. Thus, as explained herein, the era of high precision Planck scale quantum cosmology has arrived.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Hubble Constant</kwd><kwd> Cosmic Microwave Background</kwd><kwd> Quantum Cosmology</kwd><kwd> Stephan-Boltzmann</kwd><kwd> Upsilon Coupling Constant</kwd><kwd> Flat Space Cosmology</kwd><kwd> ΛCDM Cosmology</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction and Background</title><p>It has long been established that the cosmic recombination epoch Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) temperature of 3000 K correlates with a cosmological redshift z value of around 1100. This has been especially true since Fixsen updated his fitting of the CMB black body radiation spectrum with a peak temperature of 2.72548 K [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131072-ref1">1</xref>] . Given the black body nature of the 3000 K universe, it is perhaps not surprising that one can successfully apply the Stephan-Boltzmann dispersion law to derive the Tatum and Seshavatharam Hubble temperature T<sub>H</sub> formulae [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131072-ref2">2</xref>] :</p><p>k B T t ≅ ℏ c 3 8 π G M t M p l ≅ ℏ c 4 π R t R p l { M t ≅ ( ℏ c 3 8 π G k B T t ) 2 1 M p l ( A ) R t ≅ 1 R p l ( ℏ c 4 π k B ) 2 ( 1 T t ) 2 ( B ) R t T t 2 ≅ 1 R p l ( ℏ c 4 π k B ) 2 ( C ) t ≅ R t c ( D ) } (1)</p><p>Proof of the Stephan-Boltzmann derivation was given recently [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131072-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>While the Tatum and Seshavatharam temperature formulae are modeled for a Planck scale quantum cosmology for the entire history of universal expansion, we will specifically show in the present paper the correlation between the CMB temperature of 3000 K and the redshift z value of 1100. Our particular Planck scale quantum cosmology model is called Flat Space Cosmology (FSC) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131072-ref4">4</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Relevant Equations for Our CMB Temperature and Redshift Calculations</title><p>This section provides the relevant FSC equations useful for correlating a given Hubble CMB temperature T<sub>X</sub> with its predicted redshift z and predicted Hubble parameter value H<sub>T</sub>.</p><p>The usual cosmology redshift formula with regard to past and current cosmic temperatures is:</p><p>z ≅ T x T 0 − 1 (2)</p><p>wherein z is the redshift, T<sub>x</sub> is any given Hubble CMB temperature, and T<sub>0</sub> is the 2009 current Fixsen CMB temperature of 2.72548 K.</p><p>To correlate the predicted z value with the predicted temperature-dependent Hubble parameter value H<sub>T</sub>, the following FSC Hubble quantum cosmology formulae [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131072-ref5">5</xref>] are used:</p><p>H ≅ 32 π 2 k B 2 T 2 G 1 / 2 ℏ 3 / 2 c 5 / 2 H 0 ≅ 32 π 2 k B 2 T 0 2 G 1 / 2 ℏ 3 / 2 c 5 / 2 (3)</p><p>wherein the latest NIST 2018 CODATA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131072-ref6">6</xref>] are used for all constants, and T<sub>0</sub> is the 2009 Fixsen CMB temperature, the only observational input to the right-hand equation.</p><p>To correlate the FSC cosmic radius value R<sub>T</sub> at a given CMB temperature, the top equation in formulae (1) is used (see the right-hand term):</p><p>T t ≅ ℏ c 3 8 π G k B M t M p l ≅ ℏ c 4 π k B R t R p l (4)</p><p>Results of calculations made using Equations (2) thru (4) are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Discussion</title><p>Beginning in 2015, FSC has proven to be one of the most successful Planck scale quantum cosmology models to date. In fact, the Hubble parameter quantum cosmology formulae [current Equation (3)] and the top equation of the Tatum and Seshavatharam Hubble temperature T<sub>X</sub> formulae [current Equation (4)] have been used to predict, with high precision, the most recent Hubble parameter values derived from CMB studies published in 2023 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131072-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131072-ref7">7</xref>] mentions a “deeper theoretical understanding” of the relationship between the Hubble parameter and the CMB temperature. One can see in our H X / T X 2 column of <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> that there is an obvious coupling constant linking H<sub>X</sub> and T X 2 . There is slight variation in the value of this coupling constant in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, but this is only because abbreviated numbers are used in order to fit them into the table. This coupling constant first appeared in 2015 in Equation (3) of FSC reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131072-ref2">2</xref>] . It has now been calculated out to 29 decimal places [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131072-ref7">7</xref>] , using Mathematica software and the NIST 2018 CODATA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131072-ref6">6</xref>] . However, the number of decimal places is not nearly as important as the expected reduction in the uncertainty of H<sub>0</sub> in terms of standard deviation. The result of this new coupling constant precision should be high precision in Hubble parameter determinations going forward. Any cosmology formulae using a Hubble parameter value and incorporating this newer and more precise FSC coupling constant (tentatively called “Upsilon”) would be expected to vastly improve cosmological model predictions. Many such “Hubble formulae” are used in standard ΛCDM cosmology, in the same way that they are used in FSC.</p><p>The “deeper theoretical understanding” mentioned above is now revealed to be inherent in the FSC model. As clearly alluded to by Lineweaver and Patel [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131072-ref8">8</xref>] , the modeling of our universe as an expanding black hole-like object is not such an outlandish idea after all.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Correlations between radii, temperatures, redshift and Hubble parameter</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >log ( R 0 R x )</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T x</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T x 2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >H x T x 2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >z</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >H x</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.72548</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.4282412304</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.917245E-19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.167E-18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.049643E-19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.167E-18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.967313E-19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.678E-17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >665.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.955051E-19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.967E-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1102.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.944005E-19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.245E-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1823.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.936998E-19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.355E-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3025</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.920992E-19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.836E-16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5012.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.908647E-19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.458E-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3000.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.918444E-19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1099.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6266E-12</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Summary and Conclusions</title><p>This paper shows the exquisite FSC correlation between a CMB temperature of 3000 K and a cosmological redshift of 1100.</p><p>Furthermore, by revealing the obvious coupling constant linking H<sub>X</sub> and T X 2 , this paper shows the continued value of FSC as an accurate Planck scale quantum cosmology model. Although the most useful FSC quantum cosmology formulae were first published in 2018 (reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131072-ref5">5</xref>] , Section 2.9), they have been inherent in FSC since its 2015 inception. Thus, a theoretical model which is now more than eight years old continues to show its value with respect to observational correlations.</p><p>The “deeper theoretical understanding” mentioned in reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.131072-ref7">7</xref>] comes from the gradual recognition in the astrophysics and cosmology community that modeling our universe as an expanding black hole-like object is likely to be necessary, in order to achieve high precision Hubble cosmology. Such a cosmology, which requires the use of the Hubble parameter in its formulae, also requires an exquisitely high precision in its CMB-derived Hubble parameter determinations. This appears to have now been achieved. FSC provides this “deeper theoretical understanding”.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Both authors would like to acknowledge Sir Roger Penrose and the late Stephan Hawking for the inspiration provided by their enormous contributions to the field of cosmology. U.V.S. Seshavatharam is indebted to professors Madugula Nagaphani Sarma, Chairman, Institute of Scientific Research in Vedas (I-SERVE), Hyderabad, India and Shri K.V.R.S. Murthy, former scientist IICT (CSIR), Govt. of India, Director, Research and Development, I-SERVE, for their valuable guidance and great support in developing this subject. Dr. Tatum would also like to thank Dr. Rudy Schild, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, for his past support and encouragement in developing this subject.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Tatum, E.T. and Seshavatharam, U.V.S. (2024) How the Flat Space Cosmology Model Correlates the Recombination CMB Temperature of 3000 K with a Redshift of 1100. Journal of Modern Physics, 15, 174-178. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2024.152008</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.131072-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fixsen, D.J. (2009) Astrophysical Journal, 707, 916. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/916</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131072-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tatum, E.T., Seshavatharam,U.V.S. and Lakshminarayana, S. (2015) International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 5, 116-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ijaa.2015.52015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131072-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haug, E.G. and Wojnow, S. (2023) How to Predict the Temperature of the CMB Directly Using the Hubble Parameter and the Planck Scale Using the Stephan-Boltz-mann Law. https://hal.science/hal-04269991</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131072-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Tatum, E.T. (2020) A Heuristic Model of the Evolving Universe Inspired by Hawking and Penrose. In: Tatum, E.T., Ed., New Ideas Concerning Black Holes and the Universe, IntechOpen, London, 5-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.87019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131072-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tatum, E.T. (2018) Journal of Modern Physics, 9, 1867-1882. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2018.910118</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131072-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tiesinga, E., et al. (2019) The 2018 CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants (Web Version 8.1). National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg. http://physics.nist.gov/constants</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131072-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tatum, E.T., Haug, E.G. and Wojnow, S. (2023) Predicting High Precision Hubble Constant Determinations Based Upon a New Theoretical Relationship between CMB Temperature and H0. https://hal.science/hal-04268732v2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.131072-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lineweaver, C.H. and Patel, V.M. (2023) American Journal of Physics, 91, 819-825. https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0150209</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>